From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 84564 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2015 16:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 84514 invoked by uid 48); 2 Oct 2015 16:55:58 -0000 From: "sss@li-snyder.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/67821] New: [gcc 5 regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sss@li-snyder.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67821 Bug ID: 67821 Summary: [gcc 5 regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sss@li-snyder.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36438 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D36438&action=3Dedit test case hi - I'm testing gcc from the gcc-5-branch svn branch. Using the version as of 2 oct 2015 (svn rev 228385), i get an ICE compiling the attached if -O2 is used. (Reduced from core/clib/src/Demangle.c in root 6.02.08, which appears itself to have been copied from libiberty.) $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=3Dgcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=3D/usr/local/gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5= .2.1/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: /home/sss/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=3D/usr/local/gcc --enable-threads=3Dposix --enable-long-long --enable-languages=3Dc,c++,fort= ran Thread model: posix gcc version 5.2.1 20151002 (GCC)=20 $ gcc -c -O2 x.c x.c: In function =E2=80=98demangle_qualified=E2=80=99: x.c:6:9: warning: implicit declaration of function =E2=80=98isdigit=E2=80=99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (!isdigit (*p)) ^ x.c:1:5: internal compiler error: in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info, at tree-ssanames.c:506 int demangle_qualified (const char* mangled) ^ 0xb29f14 duplicate_ssa_name_range_info(tree_node*, value_range_type, range_info_def*) /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssanames.c:506 0xacdff3 eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children(basic_block_def*) /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4151 0xe9d5e1 dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*) /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/domwalk.c:188 0xacc23b eliminate /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4540 0xad405e execute /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4894 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions. $=20 tree-ssanames.c:506 is this line: gcc_assert (!SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P (name)); The last update i did from gcc-5-branch was about a month ago, and i did not see this crash with that version. thanks, sss >>From gcc-bugs-return-498635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Oct 02 16:58:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93134 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2015 16:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 90902 invoked by uid 48); 2 Oct 2015 16:58:26 -0000 From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/67818] [5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-[23].f90 Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 Content-length: 445 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference. Backtrace for this error: #0 0xF769EB7E #1 0xF769DC7E #2 0xF7798BDF #3 0x8053299 in foo.3532._omp_fn.2 at alloc-comp-2.f90:? #4 0xF760186E #5 0xF75DD34F #6 0xF7502A4D #7 0xFFFFFFFF FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-2.f90 -O0 execution test