public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/67893] New: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)
@ 2015-10-08 10:22 doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 10:25 ` [Bug other/67893] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-08 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893

            Bug ID: 67893
           Summary: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on
                    x86_64-linux-gnu)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: other
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 36462
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36462&action=edit
preprocessed source

this is one file from the insighttoolkit software, a swig generated source
file.

built with -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing
trunk needs -fpermissive in addition.

memory usage with the 4.9 branch peaks at 2.5G, with the 5 branch at 3.3G, with
trunk at 2.3G.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/67893] [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)
  2015-10-08 10:22 [Bug other/67893] New: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu) doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-08 10:25 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 11:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 11:44 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-08 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893

--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36463
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36463&action=edit
preprocessed source


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/67893] [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)
  2015-10-08 10:22 [Bug other/67893] New: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu) doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 10:25 ` [Bug other/67893] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-08 11:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 11:44 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-08 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-10-08
            Version|6.0                         |5.2.1
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.3
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can't yet confirm the regression (need to look for a bigger box...) but I can
confirm it uses >2GB even with plain -O2.  Note that -O2 has quite some
quadratic algorithms.

As even plain -O1 goes up to 2GB my usual suspect would be DF.

Note that with -O1 frontend processing peaks at 600MB and after gimplification
and lowering we are at 1GB - so this is a huge CU in the first place.  Early
opts plus IPA get us to 2GB already (same at -O2).

What's the second preprocessed source from?

Confirmed as memory-hog though.

Unfortunately as the testcase is so large it's hard to work with it but it
looks
like we gradually leak memory during late optimization/expansion, there are no
"big" functions in the end it seems.

Btw, the gcc 5 branch at r228565 peaks at 2.3GB with -O2, -g adds that other
1.2GB (hello var-tracking and VTA).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/67893] [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)
  2015-10-08 10:22 [Bug other/67893] New: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu) doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 10:25 ` [Bug other/67893] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-10-08 11:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-08 11:44 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-08 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893

--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> What's the second preprocessed source from?

the same .cpp file built with gcc-4.9.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-08 11:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-08 10:22 [Bug other/67893] New: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu) doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-08 10:25 ` [Bug other/67893] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-08 11:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-08 11:44 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).