public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
       [not found] <bug-67901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-06-08 13:00 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-11-11 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-08 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
      Known to fail|                            |11.0
   Last reconfirmed|2019-10-15 00:00:00         |2020-6-8

--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reconfirmed on mainline.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
       [not found] <bug-67901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-06-08 13:00 ` [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-11 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-11-12 18:52 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-11-12 21:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-11 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I needed one slight change to get the code to compiler (I needed this change
even for clang and MSVC):
Change:
requires sizeof...(ArgumentsRest) % 2 == 0   
to:
requires (sizeof...(ArgumentsRest) % 2 == 0)

With that change GCC 10.2.0 and GCC 11+ were able to compile the code just fine
(GCC 10.1.0 does reject it though).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
       [not found] <bug-67901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-06-08 13:00 ` [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-11-11 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-12 18:52 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-11-12 21:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-12 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needs-bisection             |
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on master with r11-1571-g57b4daf8dc4ed7b6.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
       [not found] <bug-67901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-11-12 18:52 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-12 21:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-12 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.2
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Fixed on master with r11-1571-g57b4daf8dc4ed7b6.

Which was also committed on the GCC 10 branch with r10-8343-gc3d4dbc68be14842 .

So fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-12 21:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-67901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-06-08 13:00 ` [Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-11 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 18:52 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 21:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).