public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/67967] [5.2/6 Regression] ICE in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-67967-4-jskfx5GMVk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-67967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67967
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-10-14
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 36513
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36513&action=edit
Alternative patch that avoids REG_CFA_EXPRESSION for aligned moves
I'm testing the above patch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-499573-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 14 20:46:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-499573-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98760 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2015 20:46:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98725 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2015 20:46:25 -0000
From: "vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67443] [5/6 regression] DSE removes required store instruction
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67443-4-iFNKZHVXv8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67443-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67443-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01128.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1378
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg443
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Vogt <vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
Almost. Note the strange bit numbering on s390. The highest order bit in any
operation always has the number 0, and the lowest order bit has the highest
number. So the 8-bit-move instruction "mvi" stores a byte into *a (bit 0-7),
then the 32-bit-and instruction "n" reads *a as a 32 bit value. The bits 0-7
are the highest order bits of the result, so the value read is actually
0x03xxxxxx (bits 0-7 have the value 0x03, the rest is random data).
(Actually, I couldn't read this assembly code right without the help of a
debugger.)
# r2 contains the address a at start of function
larl %r5,.L3
mvi 0(%r2),3 # b-byte store of value 3 to the *(a + 0)
# -> memory at a: 03 ** ** ** ** ** ** **
l %r1,.L4-.L3(%r5) # 32-bit-load 0xff000000 to r1
n %r1,0(%r2) # 32-bit "and" of *(a + 0) and $1, result
# stored in r1 -> 0x03000000
oill %r1,5 # 64-bit "or" of r1 with the immediate value
# 0x00000000 00000005
# r1 -> 0x03000005
st %r1,0(%r2) # 32-bit store or r1 to a
# -> memory at a: 03 00 00 05 ** ** ** **
br %r14
.L3:
.L4:
.long -16777216
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 17:14 [Bug c/67967] New: " tprince at computer dot org
2015-10-14 17:15 ` [Bug c/67967] " tprince at computer dot org
2015-10-14 17:19 ` tprince at computer dot org
2015-10-14 18:49 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-10-14 18:52 ` [Bug c/67967] [5.2/6 Regression] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-14 18:55 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-10-14 20:19 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com [this message]
2015-10-14 21:18 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-14 22:30 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-15 9:44 ` [Bug target/67967] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-67967-4-jskfx5GMVk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).