From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 44046 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2015 17:52:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44000 invoked by uid 48); 16 Oct 2015 17:52:49 -0000 From: "nacitar at ubercpp dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/67991] New: Pointer to function with internal linkage not being allowed, when it should be Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nacitar at ubercpp dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01327.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991 Bug ID: 67991 Summary: Pointer to function with internal linkage not being allowed, when it should be Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nacitar at ubercpp dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36528 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36528&action=edit test driver Returning a function pointer from a constexpr function is leading to an error, in a context where using the function pointer directly does in fact work. I don't see why it should be different. I already asked the isocpp group about this: https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/embed/?place=forum/std-discussion&showsearch=true&showpopout=true&parenturl=https://isocpp.org/forums/iso-c-standard-discussion#!topic/std-discussion/OKfPmu95en4 They stated: "This is a GCC bug. Pointers to functions with internal linkage are fine since C++11."