public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/68003] New: Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon
@ 2015-10-17 13:08 gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
2015-10-17 13:52 ` [Bug c++/68003] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net @ 2015-10-17 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Bug ID: 68003
Summary: Variable declared in condition in for loop is
destroyed too soon
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
Target Milestone: ---
Consider:
#include <cassert>
#include <iostream>
struct X
{
bool alive = true;
~X() { alive = false; }
explicit operator bool() const { return true; }
} ;
int main()
{
for(int i = 0; X x = X(); assert(x.alive))
if (++i == 3)
break;
else
std::cout << i << std::endl;
}
When compiled with gcc trunk, the program outputs:
1
a.out: t.cpp:14: int main(): Assertion `x.alive' failed.
When compiled with clang trunk, the program outputs:
1
2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/68003] Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon
2015-10-17 13:08 [Bug c++/68003] New: Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
@ 2015-10-17 13:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 15:35 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
2020-10-28 15:38 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-17 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-10-17
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/68003] Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon
2015-10-17 13:08 [Bug c++/68003] New: Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
2015-10-17 13:52 ` [Bug c++/68003] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-28 15:35 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
2020-10-28 15:38 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com @ 2020-10-28 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> ---
Confirmed. https://godbolt.org/z/MfbrcG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769 is a duplicate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/68003] Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon
2015-10-17 13:08 [Bug c++/68003] New: Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
2015-10-17 13:52 ` [Bug c++/68003] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 15:35 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
@ 2020-10-28 15:38 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-28 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68003
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PR86769 has a nicer test, so closing this one. Thanks for finding the dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 86769 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-28 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-17 13:08 [Bug c++/68003] New: Variable declared in condition in for loop is destroyed too soon gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
2015-10-17 13:52 ` [Bug c++/68003] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 15:35 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
2020-10-28 15:38 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).