From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-499856-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24461 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2015 12:00:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23960 invoked by uid 48); 18 Oct 2015 12:00:08 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68009] New: [6 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with inline matmul
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68009-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01411.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009

            Bug ID: 68009
           Summary: [6 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error
                    with inline matmul
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

A discussion from the gfortran mailing list that never made it into Bugzilla...

See the thread at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-07/msg00079.html .

The declaration of gfortran_runtime_error as emitted by the FE is incorrect,
it does not take into account that it is variadic. This is incorrect,
and causes actual problems on nvptx.

A simplistic solution which sets resolved_isym on the symbol introduces even
stranger behavior: The function call is optimized away completele
(see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-07/msg00127.html ).