From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500258-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4897 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2015 08:47:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4687 invoked by uid 48); 22 Oct 2015 08:47:09 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68046] -ftrapv doesn't catch leaq-based overflows on x86-64
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68046-4-tP57pzfLU3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68046-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68046-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01813.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note that -fsanitize-undefined doesn't properly handle

  volatile int x = __INT_MAX__ + 1;

which is in PR61893, it handles the case in this PR fine and with
trap-on-error more efficiently than -ftrapv:

main:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        movq    i(%rip), %rax
        movq    %rax, %rdx
        addq    $1, %rdx
        jo      .L6
        cmpq    %rdx, %rax
        setg    %al
        movzbl  %al, %eax
        ret
.L6:
        ud2
        .cfi_endproc

of course you simply get a SIGILL (on x86_64), an option to use
abort () would be more "compatible" with how -ftrapv behaves
(abort is also used on targets that do not have a trapping instruction
defined).