From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EFD67385781B; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 10:22:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EFD67385781B From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/68081] Cygwin GCC cannot compile program that uses __builtin_ia32_rdseed64_step Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 10:22:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 10:22:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68081 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Can this be closed as invalid? The program can't compile because it tries to use something that doesn't exist, which is not a GCC bug. (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #7) > I thought I was allowed to use documented functions; and I was not suppos= ed > to use undocumented ones. Yeah, this seems to be turned on its head :) Many built-in functions are documented so that authors of other compilers a= nd other tools (like static analysis checkers) can implement the same thing in= a compatible way. That doesn't mean users are supposed to use them directly.=