From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B05DF3858D39; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:03:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B05DF3858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663570998; bh=cgNsgtGmaENxxnT5yx3VkX8XQlzPQL0YBqBnL2FcfWE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ccqsnt2aLGZV37yjXhAXeouUcleDKIEdr1K5lqQyJYB02Ab50n1voTrcSqTZrSuEk DTqh/m199r9bYhDIkecVy7ukmTIiLAN++llFOyOJ8njkuy5UXOYDFeMn4XA+qVAQse ZejbWd4O8C41KM/FB0gSIMHMhXtyGuxt/zK2lm4c= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68097] We should track ranges for floating-point values too Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:03:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68097 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |compile-time-hog --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Yes, I think fixed in that we can now record info on FP SSA names. There a= re other bugs for specific things. What's not fixed is that we still recurse to SSA defs in gimple_assign_nonnegative_warnv_p and friends. We might think to fix that = now, so I'm leaving this bug open for this particular issue, it's a good thing to try for GCC 13.=