public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anton at samba dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68140] New: ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1413
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-68140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68140
Bug ID: 68140
Summary: ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1413
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anton at samba dot org
Target Milestone: ---
I'm seeing an ICE on powerpc64le with a checkout from last night:
# cat testcase.c
int a, b, d, e, f;
static int c;
static void fn1(void)
{
int b = 3;
for (; b >= 0; b--) {
e ^= f;
d = 0;
for (; d <= 3; d++) {
e |= f;
for (; c;)
for (;;) ;
}
}
}
int main(void)
{
if (a)
fn1();
return 0;
}
# gcc -O3 testcase.c -Wall
testcase.c: In function ‘main’:
testcase.c:18:5: internal compiler error: in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1413
int main(void)
^
0x10aed307 vect_get_vec_def_for_operand(tree_node*, gimple*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:1413
0x10aedab7 vect_get_vec_defs(tree_node*, tree_node*, gimple*, vec<tree_node*,
va_heap, vl_ptr>*, vec<tree_node*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*, _slp_tree*, int)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:1574
0x10af441b vectorizable_operation
../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:4894
0x10b0420f vect_transform_stmt(gimple*, gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*,
_slp_tree*, _slp_instance*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:7693
0x10b0bedf vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:6452
0x10b2c70b vectorize_loops()
../../gcc/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:512
0x10a0c6fb execute
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c:278
>From gcc-bugs-return-500861-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:28:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500861-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95003 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:28:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94971 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:28:25 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68040] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68040-4-CyZfS8HZfV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02416.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1180
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is this configured with --enable-checking=release ? This is probably an ICE
that occurs earlier than reported with --enabled-checking=release. Configure
with --enable-checking=yes.
It should be possible to get a more precise revision. Those two do not look
like the cause of the problem.
My guess is that Fortran is calling into the middle-end without calling
gfc_diagnostics_finish(). The format decoder gfc_format_decoder does not
support %E, thus either Fortran adds support for %E or it calls
gfc_diagnostic_finish before reaching this point.
However, I would argue that this precise warning does not need to use %E and it
could simply use %s, which will make it less dependent on trees and fix this
bug without further changes in Fortran.
>From gcc-bugs-return-500863-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:45:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500863-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6747 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:45:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6683 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:45:38 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68119] GCC diagnostic push/pop interfere with control flow statements
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68119-4-xXSX6XC4Gu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02418.txt.bz2
Content-length: 943
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68119
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I really don't think this should be invalid. What is the benefit of treating
pragmas as statements?
Moreover, I would argue that the diagnostic pragmas in particular should be
handled by the preprocessor and behave like any other preprocessor directive.
Otherwise, they are not effective for controlling diagnostics that come from
the preprocessor.
At the very least, this is a documentation bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 41517 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-500862-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:45:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500862-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6733 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:45:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6706 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:45:39 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-41517-4-wZDES78pnh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-41517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-41517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02417.txt.bz2
Content-length: 488
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jbrandmeyer at google dot com
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-500865-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:49:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500865-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39181 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:49:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39129 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:49:20 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63326-4-FHPQfewOUw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02420.txt.bz2
Content-length: 163
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Related bug: PR42979
>From gcc-bugs-return-500864-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:49:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500864-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38427 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:49:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38393 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:48:59 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cc cf_gcchost cf_gccbuild
Message-ID: <bug-41517-4-D4cKt7ESWx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-41517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-41517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02419.txt.bz2
Content-length: 589
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Build|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Related bug: PR63326
>From gcc-bugs-return-500867-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:50:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500867-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40635 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:50:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40557 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:50:44 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/42979] OpenMP #pragma omp taskwait after a label is not permitted - should fail at compile time
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-42979-4-xQYWAsd9Pc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-42979-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-42979-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02422.txt.bz2
Content-length: 491
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42979
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |felix.abecassis at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 59367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-500866-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 00:50:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500866-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40626 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 00:50:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40532 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 00:50:43 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59367] Syntax error with #pragma message before "else"
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-59367-4-6eo1wFOk1v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02421.txt.bz2
Content-length: 623
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59367
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of PR42979 or PR63326
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42979 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-500868-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 29 02:03:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-500868-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30153 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 02:03:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30107 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2015 02:03:44 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/51993] Erroneous type component initialization leads to internal compiler error
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 02:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-51993-4-UF3YeMympC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02423.txt.bz2
Content-length: 564
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idQ993
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Changing the gcc_assert to an early return gives
% gfc6 -c h6.f90
h6.f90:3:27:
character(len=3) :: a = .true.
1
Error: Can't convert LOGICAL(4) to CHARACTER(1) at (1)
troutmask:sgk[219]
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-29 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-29 0:06 anton at samba dot org [this message]
2015-10-29 7:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/68140] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-68140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).