public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
[not found] <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-11-23 7:36 ` vvsed at hotmail dot com
2021-12-26 5:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/68484] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: vvsed at hotmail dot com @ 2015-11-23 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Sedach <vvsed at hotmail dot com> ---
It is not just about "long long".
_mm_store_ps() is also wrong, while _mm_store_pd() / _mm_store_si128() are OK:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <emmintrin.h>
int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
{
__attribute__((aligned(16))) int _x[4] = {0};
int * volatile x = _x;
__m128i m = _mm_set1_epi32(1);
_mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); //wrong
// _mm_storel_pi((__m64 *)x, *(__m128 *)&m); //ok
_mm_store_ps((float *)x, *(__m128 *)&m); //wrong
// _mm_store_pd((double *)x, *(__m128d *)&m); //ok
// _mm_store_si128((__m128i *)x, *(__m128i *)&m); //ok
fprintf(stdout, "%d %d \npress Enter", x[0], x[1]);
getc(stdin);
return 0;
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503426-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 07:51:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503426-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59402 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 07:51:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59303 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 07:51:00 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68488] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 07:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68488-4-8HSTOCmpIN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68488-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68488-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02353.txt.bz2
Content-length: 582
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68488
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68432 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503425-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 07:51:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503425-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59387 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 07:51:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59332 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 07:51:01 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 07:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-lnhb2u9LpJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02352.txt.bz2
Content-length: 459
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503427-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:01:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503427-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96689 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:01:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96645 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:01:06 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68484-4-VmH6wbNQ5W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02354.txt.bz2
Content-length: 522
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Sedach from comment #2)
> It is not just about "long long".
It isn't about long long at all, it is about whether your code is valid. In
your latest example, you are casting an int* to a float*, that's pretty much
the definition of an aliasing violation.
The types __m128 etc are documented as allowing aliasing, but I don't think
that extends to other operands of the intrinsics.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503429-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:33:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503429-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35518 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:33:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35326 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 08:33:00 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/56956] [4.9 Regression] ftrapv traps on valid abs-like code
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work short_desc cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-56956-4-R9FKDnEgSE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02356.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56956
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |5.3.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ftrapv |[4.9 Regression] ftrapv
|traps on valid abs-like |traps on valid abs-like
|code |code
Known to fail| |5.2.0
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 23 08:32:28 2015
New Revision: 230736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
2015-10-29 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/56956
* fold-const.c (fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): Do not fold
unsigned conditonal negation to ABS_EXPR.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/pr56956.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr56956.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fold-const.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503428-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:33:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503428-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35508 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:33:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35310 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:33:00 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/56956] [4.9 Regression] ftrapv traps on valid abs-like code
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work short_desc cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-56956-4-JEbv0Ky6lF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02355.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56956
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |5.3.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ftrapv |[4.9 Regression] ftrapv
|traps on valid abs-like |traps on valid abs-like
|code |code
Known to fail| |5.2.0
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 23 08:32:28 2015
New Revision: 230736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
2015-10-29 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/56956
* fold-const.c (fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): Do not fold
unsigned conditonal negation to ABS_EXPR.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/pr56956.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr56956.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fold-const.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503430-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:36:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503430-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41236 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:36:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41183 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:36:06 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68493] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE in copy_loop_phi_args
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68493-4-Eklvhejkhy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02357.txt.bz2
Content-length: 366
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503432-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:37:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503432-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43494 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:37:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43456 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:37:48 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status component assigned_to target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-xF0Nrf70is@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02359.txt.bz2
Content-length: 636
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |i?86-*-*
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503431-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:37:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503431-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42788 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:37:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42722 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 08:37:31 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68445] [6 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68445-4-aK5Y8pUvmE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68445-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68445-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02358.txt.bz2
Content-length: 647
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 23 08:36:59 2015
New Revision: 230737
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230737&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68445
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_create_mask_and_perm): Properly use
two different strides.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503433-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:38:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503433-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44400 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:38:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44231 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:37:58 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68445] [6 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68445-4-6Zcky5DoLg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68445-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68445-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02360.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503434-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:40:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503434-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46352 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:40:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46299 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:40:25 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-jOURicAIsX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02361.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503435-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:47:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503435-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94187 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:47:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94125 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:47:46 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc component everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68484-4-meWBYzYfLt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02362.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Component|c++ |target
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As the summary mentions 'volatile' I'll also point to the implementation of the
intrinsics which have
/* Store four SPFP values. The address must be 16-byte aligned. */
extern __inline void __attribute__((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__,
__artificial__))
_mm_store_ps (float *__P, __m128 __A)
{
*(__v4sf *)__P = (__v4sf)__A;
}
so they are not using a volatile qualified type to access *__P which means
the stores are not considered volatile by GCC.
The arguments about strict-aliasing requirements still hold, only __m128 is
declared as __may_alias__:
/* The Intel API is flexible enough that we must allow aliasing with other
vector types, and their scalar components. */
typedef float __m128 __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16), __may_alias__));
/* Internal data types for implementing the intrinsics. */
typedef float __v4sf __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
so the v4sf store has regular TBAA rules applied (and the __may_alias__ on
the by value passed __A has no effect).
-> target "bug", but I'd say an INVALID one.
HJ, I remember the "master" copy of the intrinsics documentation is somewhere
at Intel - what does that say to the two above issues?
Thus all of this boils down to the question whether the intrinsics are
implemented correctly (as documented). The volatile part of it would
mean to either pessimize all users or that we can't implement the
intrinsics as C functions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503436-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 08:53:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503436-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128932 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 08:53:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128894 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 08:53:17 -0000
From: "sneves at dei dot uc.pt" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68495] Error when expanding nontype variadic argument in trailing return type
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sneves at dei dot uc.pt
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68495-4-LPHy9ISiUm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68495-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68495-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02363.txt.bz2
Content-length: 594
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Neves <sneves at dei dot uc.pt> ---
Minimal example can be further reduced to
template<int> struct int_seq {};
constexpr struct {
constexpr int operator()(int x) const { return x + 1; }
} f1 {};
template<typename F, int A>
auto f2(F f, int_seq<A>) -> int_seq<f(A)> {
return {};
}
int main() {
f2(f1, int_seq<0>{});
}
This suggests that the issue is with GCC not recognizing that `f::operator()`
is constexpr; this information is seemingly lost somewhere along the way.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503437-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:02:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503437-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42202 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:02:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42126 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:02:02 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on component blocked target_milestone short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-Iuf5f5JmW7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02364.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1645
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Component|other |target
Blocks| |53947
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
Summary|gcc 5.2: suboptimal code |[5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2:
|compared to 4.9 |suboptimal code compared to
| |4.9
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hum, on x86_64 I don't see either GCC 4.9 or GCC 5.2 vectorize the function at
all because they fail to analyze the evolution of the dataref for input[j] as
the initial j of the inner loop is not propagated as zero.
With i?86 I can confirm your observation but I don't see it fixed on trunk.
Note that this boils down to vector shift detection of permutes where (IIRC)
some patterns were not properly guarded on SSE3 support previously and a
wrong-code bug was fixed conservatively on the GCC 5 branch while missing
support was only implemented on trunk.
The failure to vectorize on x86_64 isn't a regression.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
>From gcc-bugs-return-503438-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:11:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503438-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83713 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:11:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83609 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:11:07 -0000
From: "ismail at i10z dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68496] New: [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ismail at i10z dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02365.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2456
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68496
Bug ID: 68496
Summary: [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: ismail at i10z dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Getting:
Aborted
reflect.call.N13_reflect.Value
/havana/sources/gcc-trunk/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest32408/test/value.go:450
reflect.Call.N13_reflect.Value
/havana/sources/gcc-trunk/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest32408/test/value.go:300
reflect_test.TestCallWithStruct
/havana/sources/gcc-trunk/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest32408/test/all_test.go:1492
testing.tRunner
../../../libgo/go/testing/testing.go:455
goroutine 16 [chan receive]:
testing.RunTests
../../../libgo/go/testing/testing.go:561
testing.Run.pN9_testing.M
../../../libgo/go/testing/testing.go:493
main.main
/havana/sources/gcc-trunk/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest32408/test/_testmain.go:146
created by main
../../../libgo/runtime/go-main.c:48
goroutine 18 [finalizer wait]:
created by runtime_createfing
../../../libgo/runtime/mgc0.c:2577
goroutine 53 [sleep]:
reflect_test.selectWatcher
/havana/sources/gcc-trunk/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest32408/test/all_test.go:1383
created by reflect_test.$nested2
/havana/sources/gcc-trunk/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo/gotest32408/test/all_test.go:1113
FAIL: reflect
λ ./gcc/gccgo -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./gcc/gccgo
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go --enable-checking=release --enable-ssp
--disable-libssp --disable-libvtv --disable-libmpx --with-system-zlib
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linker-build-id
--disable-plugin --enable-linux-futex --program-suffix=-6
--without-system-libunwind --with-tune=corei7-avx
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --disable-multilib --disable-werror
--disable-nls --with-fpmath=sse --enable-clocale=gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151123 (experimental) (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503439-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:11:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503439-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84271 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:11:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83873 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:11:12 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68482] No vectorization for x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68482-4-C9WYJGuYKx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02366.txt.bz2
Content-length: 482
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68482
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503440-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:11:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503440-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85143 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:11:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85113 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 09:11:32 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68482] No vectorization for x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68482-4-4SxDVI5s6R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02367.txt.bz2
Content-length: 493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68482
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 23 09:11:00 2015
New Revision: 230740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68482
* gcc.dg/vect/pr68482.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68482.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503441-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:17:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503441-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9564 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:17:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9470 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:17:49 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68479] Dynamic loading multiple shared libraries with identical static libstdc++ breaks streams
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68479-4-nmrln8877W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02368.txt.bz2
Content-length: 743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68479
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. I don't think this is intended to work when you re-export the
libstdc++ symbols. Not sure if there is an easy way to make them hidden
with --begin-group/--end-group and a linker flag. So you'd need to provide
a version script to the link of x.so and y.so.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503442-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:20:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503442-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12072 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:20:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12002 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:20:30 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68476] microblaze: compilation of btSoftBody.cpp doesn't terminate with optimisation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68476-4-naIRgJ0AgO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02369.txt.bz2
Content-length: 628
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68476
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |microblaze
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Waiting for at least a preprocessed source file and the compile output with -v
appended.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503444-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:21:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503444-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13943 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:21:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13711 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:21:19 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68474] [6 Regression] ICE: in get_no_error_domain, at tree-call-cdce.c:699 with -funsafe-math-optimizations
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68474-4-0jfOGZWz68@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02371.txt.bz2
Content-length: 370
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68474
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503445-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:21:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503445-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15792 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:21:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15359 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:21:41 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-fLeri6YYSi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02372.txt.bz2
Content-length: 370
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503443-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:21:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503443-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12953 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:21:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12885 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:20:58 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-YyOaa1AaXa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02370.txt.bz2
Content-length: 980
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Hidden behind a -fexternal-blas-n switch might be an option. Including GPUs
> seems even a tad more tricky. We have a paper on GPU (small) matrix
> multiplication, http://dbcsr.cp2k.org/_media/gpu_book_chapter_submitted.pdf
Quite interesting what can be done with GPUs...
> . BTW, another interesting project is the libxsmm library more aimed at
> small (<128) matrices see : https://github.com/hfp/libxsmm . Not sure if
> this info is useful in this context, but it might provide inspiration.
I assume that for small matrices bordering on the silly
(say, a matrix multiplication with dimensions of (1,2) and (2,1))
the inline code will be faster if the code is compiled with the
right options, due to function call overhead. I also assume that
libxsmm will become faster quite soon for bigger sizes.
Do you have an idea where the crossover is?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503446-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:22:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503446-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18321 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:22:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18060 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:22:05 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68477] error: type variant differs by TYPE_STRING_FLAG.
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68477-4-czcNYlm02K@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02373.txt.bz2
Content-length: 610
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68477
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry, the second file isn't necessary at all:
% gccgo -flto foo1.go
go1: error: type variant differs by TYPE_STRING_FLAG.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503447-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:23:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503447-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19506 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:23:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19421 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:23:04 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/68470] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal Compiler Error observed by g++-4.9.2 and a few other versions (reported to Debian)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68470-4-Ul2IpMbLAw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02374.txt.bz2
Content-length: 443
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mliska at suse dot cz
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
>From gcc-bugs-return-503448-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:26:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503448-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23069 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23023 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:25:58 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug driver/68463] Offloading fails when some objects are compiled with LTO and some without
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: driver
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, openacc, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords component
Message-ID: <bug-68463-4-yJBJOnGmv4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68463-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68463-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02375.txt.bz2
Content-length: 719
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68463
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |lto
Component|other |driver
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Or maybe just print an error during linking that offloading doesn't support
> mixing LTO and non-LTO objects (even if some of them doesn't have offload)?
That's the worst solution - having non-LTO objects is the whole point of
linker-plugin support.
I presume the same issue exists for GCC 5.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503449-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:31:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503449-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29096 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:31:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29065 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:31:25 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68462] -fno-strict-aliasing not respected
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68462-4-9jmbT0KsuT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68462-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68462-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02376.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With N_domains non-static GCC has to assume it has its address taken and thus
it thinks that the stores to ->next, .lol and .size can alias it.
So the issue that -fno-strict-aliasing is not "respected" is that type-based
aliasing only matters for memory accesses via pointers and GCC can independelty
prove that N_domains is not pointed-to if it is static.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503450-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:32:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503450-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31027 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:32:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30906 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:32:26 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-hXotHtugba@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02377.txt.bz2
Content-length: 758
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #22 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21)
> I assume that for small matrices bordering on the silly
> (say, a matrix multiplication with dimensions of (1,2) and (2,1))
> the inline code will be faster if the code is compiled with the
> right options, due to function call overhead. I also assume that
> libxsmm will become faster quite soon for bigger sizes.
>
> Do you have an idea where the crossover is?
I agree that inline should be faster, if the compiler is reasonably smart, if
the matrix dimensions are known at compile time (i.e. should be able to
generate the same kernel). I haven't checked yet.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503451-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:46:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503451-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19177 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:46:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18744 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 09:46:11 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68460] ICE in init_stmt_vec_info_vec with -ftree-vectorize and -ftree-parallelize-loops
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68460-4-CJ8adkYTCG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68460-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68460-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02378.txt.bz2
Content-length: 722
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68460
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Nov 23 09:45:38 2015
New Revision: 230742
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230742&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Always call free_stmt_vec_info_vec in gather_scalar_reductions
2015-11-23 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR tree-optimization/68460
* tree-parloops.c (gather_scalar_reductions): Also call
free_stmt_vec_info_vec if simple_loop_info == NULL.
* gcc.dg/autopar/pr68460.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/pr68460.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-parloops.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503452-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 09:53:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503452-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60755 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 09:53:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60188 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 09:53:17 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/66432] [4.9 Regression] libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1.c -O2 -g: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-66432-4-Bx3yNZ6QyN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02379.txt.bz2
Content-length: 727
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|openmp |
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] |[4.9 Regression]
|libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1 |libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1
|.c -O2 -g: type mismatch |.c -O2 -g: type mismatch
|between an SSA_NAME and its |between an SSA_NAME and its
|symbol |symbol
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 5.3+ so far.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503453-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:02:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503453-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92264 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:02:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92173 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 10:02:23 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68327] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8562
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68327-4-prqmdaDgrx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68327-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68327-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02380.txt.bz2
Content-length: 805
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68327
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Nov 23 10:01:51 2015
New Revision: 230743
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230743&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/68327
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_determine_vectorization_factor): Don't
compute vectype for non-relevant mask producers.
* gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_comparison): Check stmt
relevance earlier.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/68327
* gcc.dg/pr68327.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68327.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503454-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:03:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503454-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94688 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:02:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94611 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:02:56 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68327] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8562
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68327-4-rcimZ1lltt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68327-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68327-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02381.txt.bz2
Content-length: 430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68327
Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed
>From gcc-bugs-return-503455-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:04:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503455-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98767 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:04:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97762 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 10:04:37 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68173] gcc takes a long time and a lot of memory with -O0 on source file with very large expression
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: memory-hog, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68173-4-ANchMcDDuP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68173-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68173-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02382.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1141
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
>
> --- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> > callgrind points at bitmap_set_bit called via process_bb_lives ->
> > mark_regno_dead.
> > Maybe some code in that (the DCE code?) can be keyed on if (optimize).
> >
> > in mark_regno_dead callgrind points to
> >
> > bitmap_set_bit (bb_killed_pseudos, regno);
> >
> > being the expensive one.
>
> I've tried to implement bb_killed_pseudos and bb_gen_pseudos as
> sparsesets but it gave nothing in term of compiler speed. I think the
> major problem is in processing too many pseudos in -O0 mode which are
> about 1000 times more than in -O2 mode.
Yeah, but without optimization we can't do sth about that (well, do
more coalescing maybe, but as said coalescing is O(n^2) because of
liveness - so we'd run into the very same issue there).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503456-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:14:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503456-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117096 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:14:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117028 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:14:28 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-PdmfMRmiOS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02383.txt.bz2
Content-length: 514
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On i?86 this regressed with r217509, aka part of VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR removal.
Guess we'll need to have a look at the i?86 vec perm handling.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503457-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:27:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503457-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130710 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:27:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129898 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:27:27 -0000
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-Nc4FLfYXAv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02384.txt.bz2
Content-length: 349
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have a patch series that fixes the bug but I need to make sure
that it works on other targets that use the "enabled" attribute,
and run it through an all-target test. I'm hoping to post the
patches tomorrow.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503458-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:33:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503458-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11730 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:33:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11381 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:33:10 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68455] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68455-4-iriOLoxqsu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02385.txt.bz2
Content-length: 476
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'll have a look then.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503460-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:34:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503460-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15009 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:34:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14948 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:34:33 -0000
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63303-4-A2VfmV90YL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02387.txt.bz2
Content-length: 477
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #14 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Szabolcs Nagy from comment #13)
> if gcc treats p-q as (ssize_t)p-(ssize_t)q and makes
> optimization decisions based on signed int range then
> that's broken and leads to wrong code gen.
Thanks for the test case. I think the remedy proposed so far (glibc should
block allocations sized half of the address space and larger) is insufficient.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503459-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:34:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503459-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13968 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:34:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13919 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:34:07 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-Hz8xTksKtN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02386.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1010
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, no, the problem is not on the backend side, but during veclower2 pass.
Before that pass we after the replacement of v>> 64 or v>>32 shifts we have:
vect_sum_15.12_58 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <vect_sum_15.10_57, { 0, 0, 0, 0 }, { 2, 3,
4, 5 }>;
vect_sum_15.12_59 = vect_sum_15.12_58 + vect_sum_15.10_57;
vect_sum_15.12_60 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <vect_sum_15.12_59, { 0, 0, 0, 0 }, { 1, 2,
3, 4 }>;
vect_sum_15.12_61 = vect_sum_15.12_60 + vect_sum_15.12_59;
but veclower2 for some reason decides to lower the latter VEC_PERM_EXPR into:
_32 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vect_sum_15.12_59, 32, 32>;
_17 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vect_sum_15.12_59, 32, 64>;
_23 = BIT_FIELD_REF <vect_sum_15.12_59, 32, 96>;
vect_sum_15.12_60 = {_32, _17, _23, 0};
The first VEC_PERM_EXPR is kept and generates efficient code. If I manually
disable in the debugger the lowering, the code regression is gone.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503461-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:41:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503461-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118999 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:41:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118006 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:41:40 -0000
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/67999] Wrong optimization of pointer comparisons
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-67999-4-WjQSxcaVws@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67999-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67999-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02388.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1245
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67999
Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #26 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #12)
> (In reply to Daniel Micay from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7)
> > > If this is not a GCC bug and it is the responsibility of allocators not to
> > > produce huge objects, do we also have to make sure that no object crosses
> > > the boundary between 0x7fff_ffff and 0x8000_0000? If pointers are treated
> > > as de-facto signed, this is where signed overflow would occur.
> >
> > No, that's fine.
>
> Is this based on your reading of the standard, the GCC sources, or both?
> (It is unusual to see people making such definite statements about
> middle-end/back-end behavior, that's why I have to ask.)
As I suspect, the claim that this is fine seems to be incorrect, see bug 63303
comment 13.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503462-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 10:58:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503462-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96400 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 10:58:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96183 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 10:58:52 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68494] [ARM] Use vector multiply by lane
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68494-4-QK9no0Wt8B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02389.txt.bz2
Content-length: 641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68494
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
NTAPS is undefined.
What's the current output and what output do you expect ?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503463-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:01:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503463-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101553 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:01:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101431 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:01:48 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68128] A huge regression in Parboil v2.5 OpenMP CUTCP test (2.5 times lower performance)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68128-4-8FU5ZUDnFU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68128-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68128-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02390.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1810
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
.omp_data_i = &PARM_NOALIAS.0+64
PARM_NOALIAS.0+64 = &NONLOCAL
PARM_NOALIAS.64+192 = &NONLOCAL
...
_35 = *.omp_data_i
pg_36 = _35 + UNKNOWN
pg_63 = pg_36
.omp_data_i_12(D), points-to vars: { D.1985 } (nonlocal)
pg_63 = { NONLOCAL }
and we end up with
<bb 9>:
# iftmp.0_7 = PHI <e_45(7), 0.0(8)>
_47 = iftmp.0_7 + _46;
*pg_63 = _47;
i_49 = i_62 + 1;
# PT = nonlocal
pg_50 = pg_63 + 4;
_51 = MEM[(struct .omp_data_s.1 &).omp_data_i_12(D) clique 1 base
1].gridspacing;
dx_52 = _51 + dx_64;
if (ib_28 >= i_49)
goto <bb 7>;
else
goto <bb 6>;
where we consider the load of gridspacing to alias *pg_63. That is because
of the not implemented ??? in
/* Mark "other" loads and stores as belonging to CLIQUE and with
base zero. */
static bool
visit_loadstore (gimple *, tree base, tree ref, void *clique_)
{
unsigned short clique = (uintptr_t)clique_;
if (TREE_CODE (base) == MEM_REF
|| TREE_CODE (base) == TARGET_MEM_REF)
{
tree ptr = TREE_OPERAND (base, 0);
if (TREE_CODE (ptr) == SSA_NAME
&& ! SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (ptr))
{
/* ??? We need to make sure 'ptr' doesn't include any of
the restrict tags we added bases for in its points-to set. */
return false;
}
which would need to look at ptr's points-to solution and intersect that
with a bitmap we'd need to form out of the restrict tags used for the
respective clique (we only use a single one at the moment, thus a
single bit test is enough if you consider properly pt_anything for ptr).
It's not a complicated fix I think so if you have time to play with it...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503464-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:09:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503464-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118042 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:09:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117525 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:09:42 -0000
From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68497] New: ICE: in output_387_binary_op, at config/i386/i386.c:17689 with -fno-checking
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zsojka at seznam dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02391.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2423
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68497
Bug ID: 68497
Summary: ICE: in output_387_binary_op, at
config/i386/i386.c:17689 with -fno-checking
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: zsojka at seznam dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36806
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36806&action=edit
reduced testcase
Compiler output:
$ gcc -fno-checking testcase.c
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
testcase.c:5:1: internal compiler error: in output_387_binary_op, at
config/i386/i386.c:17689
}
^
0xecd4d6 output_387_binary_op(rtx_def*, rtx_def**)
/repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:17689
0x85693b final_scan_insn(rtx_insn*, _IO_FILE*, int, int, int*)
/repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/final.c:2947
0x8584c2 final(rtx_insn*, _IO_FILE*, int)
/repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/final.c:2044
0x858e69 rest_of_handle_final
/repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/final.c:4435
0x858e69 execute
/repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/final.c:4510
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-latest/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-trunk-230738-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /repo/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-checking=yes,rtl,df --without-cloog --without-ppl --without-isl
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-230738-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151123 (experimental) (GCC)
The failing assertion is:
17686: && (STACK_TOP_P (operands[1]) || STACK_TOP_P (operands[2])))
17687: ; /* ok */
17688: else
17689: gcc_checking_assert (is_sse);
17690:
17691: switch (GET_CODE (operands[3]))
17692: {
The above if(flag_checking ... ) is false for -fno-checking, but
gcc_checking_assert() doesn't care about -fno-checking.
Tested revisions:
r230738 - ICE
>From gcc-bugs-return-503465-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:27:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503465-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27699 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:27:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27292 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:27:15 -0000
From: "jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67550] [5/6 regression] Initialization of local struct array with elements of global array yields zeros instead of initializer values
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67550-4-nWSVmI6joJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02392.txt.bz2
Content-length: 496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
--- Comment #4 from Jason Wyatt <jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com> ---
It appears that while parsing the initialiser for the array,
maybe_constant_init switches the var for a constructor. This constructor only
sets the m2 member variable. You can see the result in the gimple it produces:
testValue = 1;
var = {};
var.m2 = 2;
var.m1 = testValue;
array = {};
array[0].m2 = 2;
>From gcc-bugs-return-503466-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:43:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503466-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62048 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:43:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62004 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:43:27 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68465] pass_lim doesn't detect identical loop entry conditions
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68465-4-MkFw8NfDOe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02393.txt.bz2
Content-length: 522
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68465
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think that's LIMs job then. Iterating LIM won't help here w/o
intermediate optimization.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503467-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:45:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503467-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66953 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:45:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66885 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:45:32 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug plugins/54959] current_pass == NULL during invocation of pass->gate within execute_ipa_summary_passes()
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: plugins
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-54959-4-mH7r0PmjPU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02394.txt.bz2
Content-length: 475
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54959
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, 'this' should be used instead of current_pass.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503468-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:50:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503468-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73716 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:50:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73666 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:50:01 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-MVLbWzucI7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02395.txt.bz2
Content-length: 465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like a duplicate of PR68327. r230743 fixed 465.tonto build for me.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503469-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 11:59:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503469-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89070 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 11:59:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88987 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 11:58:58 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-63303-4-sOkFBbZbO2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02396.txt.bz2
Content-length: 998
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note that in practice it needs exposal of the address constant to trigger the
bogus optimization.
Note that the IL from the frontend is indeed the one to blame here:
char * p = (char *) mmap (2147479552B, 8192, 3, 50, -1, 0);
char * q = 2147483647B;
if ((int) (p + 4096) - (int) q > 0)
{
for correctness WRT undefined overflow we need to do the subtraction
in unsigned arithmetic and then interpret the result as signed
(for an eventual division by element size).
Same issue in the C++ frontend btw.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503470-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:01:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503470-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95378 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:01:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95292 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:01:27 -0000
From: "winter-gcc@bfw-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65178] incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized when using nested loops
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: winter-gcc@bfw-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version
Message-ID: <bug-65178-4-KsPpApFaBU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02397.txt.bz2
Content-length: 374
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Leon Winter <winter-gcc@bfw-online.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|5.0 |5.2.1
--- Comment #4 from Leon Winter <winter-gcc@bfw-online.de> ---
Bug still persists.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503471-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:12:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503471-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113027 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:12:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112483 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:12:02 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68498] New: Replace LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES with LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02398.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2600
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68498
Bug ID: 68498
Summary: Replace LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES with
LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider apply_loop_flags:
...
static void
apply_loop_flags (unsigned flags)
{
if (flags & LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES)
{
/* If the loops may have multiple latches, we cannot canonicalize
them further (and most of the loop manipulation functions will
not work). However, we avoid modifying cfg, which some
passes may want. */
gcc_assert ((flags & ~(LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES
| LOOPS_HAVE_RECORDED_EXITS)) == 0);
loops_state_set (LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES);
}
else
disambiguate_loops_with_multiple_latches ();
/* Create pre-headers. */
if (flags & LOOPS_HAVE_PREHEADERS)
{
int cp_flags = CP_SIMPLE_PREHEADERS;
if (flags & LOOPS_HAVE_FALLTHRU_PREHEADERS)
cp_flags |= CP_FALLTHRU_PREHEADERS;
create_preheaders (cp_flags);
}
/* Force all latches to have only single successor. */
if (flags & LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES)
force_single_succ_latches ();
/* Mark irreducible loops. */
if (flags & LOOPS_HAVE_MARKED_IRREDUCIBLE_REGIONS)
mark_irreducible_loops ();
if (flags & LOOPS_HAVE_RECORDED_EXITS)
record_loop_exits ();
}
...
Most properties in there have a handling bit: if property, do something.
The odd one out is LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES, where we have if !property,
do something.
LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES is not really a property, it's the absence of
LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES that's a property, which we might call
LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH).
It would properly be better to replace uses of LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES
with uses of LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH. We would get in apply_loop_flags:
...
if (flags & LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH)
disambiguate_loops_with_multiple_latches ();
else
{
/* If the loops may have multiple latches, we cannot canonicalize
them further (and most of the loop manipulation functions will
not work). However, we avoid modifying cfg, which some
passes may want. */
gcc_assert ((flags & ~(LOOPS_HAVE_RECORDED_EXITS)) == 0);
}
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503474-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:14:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503474-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119923 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:14:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119778 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 12:14:41 -0000
From: "jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68317-4-5DiGrLDY9d@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68317-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68317-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02401.txt.bz2
Content-length: 800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317
--- Comment #11 from Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jiwang
Date: Mon Nov 23 12:14:05 2015
New Revision: 230754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch] Drop constant overflow flag in adjust_range_with_scev when possible
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.com>
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@arm.com>
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/68317
PR tree-optimization/68326
* tree-vrp.c (adjust_range_with_scev): Call drop_tree_overflow if the
final min and max are not infinity.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr68317.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68317.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503472-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:14:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503472-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118976 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:14:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118939 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:14:27 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68497] ICE: in output_387_binary_op, at config/i386/i386.c:17689 with -fno-checking
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68497-4-OLqwJUSltN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02399.txt.bz2
Content-length: 705
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68497
Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
CC| |miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. I have a patch and I'll post it shortly (after regtest).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503473-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:14:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503473-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119832 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:14:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119735 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 12:14:40 -0000
From: "jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68326] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68326-4-PkUA5RTL2A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02400.txt.bz2
Content-length: 799
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68326
--- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jiwang
Date: Mon Nov 23 12:14:05 2015
New Revision: 230754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch] Drop constant overflow flag in adjust_range_with_scev when possible
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.com>
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@arm.com>
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/68317
PR tree-optimization/68326
* tree-vrp.c (adjust_range_with_scev): Call drop_tree_overflow if the
final min and max are not infinity.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr68317.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68317.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503475-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:15:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503475-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122475 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:15:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122415 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:15:18 -0000
From: "jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68317-4-G0dKdmBpVu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68317-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68317-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02402.txt.bz2
Content-length: 428
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317
Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Jiong Wang <jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mark as fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503476-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:18:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503476-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130595 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:18:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130565 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:18:14 -0000
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68499] New: Unclear STDC FP_CONTRACT behavior in non-standard modes
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02403.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1514
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68499
Bug ID: 68499
Summary: Unclear STDC FP_CONTRACT behavior in non-standard
modes
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36807
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36807&action=edit
example of C program based on the STDC FP_CONTRACT pragma
The following applies to:
gcc (Debian 20151030-1) 6.0.0 20151031 (experimental) [trunk revision 229615]
When I compile a C program like the attached one with
#pragma STDC FP_CONTRACT OFF
in a standard mode, the pragma is now taken into account as expected (see
PR37845 / r204460). However, in a non-standard mode such as the default gnu99
(?), it is not taken into account (a FMA is generated for an operation like
x*y+z), but one gets no warnings either. One should have one of the following
behaviors in non-standard modes:
1. The pragma is taken into account.
2. The pragma is not taken into account, but one gets a warning (making it
unknown in non-standard modes is OK).
If possible, (1) is probably the best choice, at least in gnu99 and gnu11
modes, as the user may want to disable contraction for some floating-point
algorithms while still being able to use specific GNU extensions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503477-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:20:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503477-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21331 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:20:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21269 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 12:20:02 -0000
From: "ch3root at openwall dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ch3root at openwall dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63303-4-vadr7KfAtG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02404.txt.bz2
Content-length: 880
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root at openwall dot com> ---
On 2015-11-23 14:58, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Note that in practice it needs exposal of the address constant to trigger the
> bogus optimization.
No. The program:
#include <stdint.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
// make sure our allocation will cross 0x80000000 boundary
// but still will not violate limits of gcc
size_t len = 0x7fffffff;
char *p1 = malloc(len);
char *volatile v = p1 + len;
char *p2 = v;
long l1 = (long)(uintptr_t)p1;
long l2 = (long)(uintptr_t)p2;
if (l2 < l1) {
long z = p2 - p1;
if (z < 0)
printf("%ld\n", z);
}
}
prints a positive number for me even though it guards against it. gcc
5.2 with -m32 -O2.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503479-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:36:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503479-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31433 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:36:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29887 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:36:16 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68500] New: Remove in_loop_pipeline usage
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02406.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1080
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
Bug ID: 68500
Summary: Remove in_loop_pipeline usage
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider pass_slp_vectorize::execute
...
pass_slp_vectorize::execute (function *fun)
{
basic_block bb;
bool in_loop_pipeline = scev_initialized_p ();
if (!in_loop_pipeline)
{
loop_optimizer_init (LOOPS_NORMAL);
scev_initialize ();
}
...
if (!in_loop_pipeline)
{
scev_finalize ();
loop_optimizer_finalize ();
}
...
It uses an in_loop_pipeline variable, initialized using scev_initialized_p to
detect whether the pass is run in the loop pipeline, to allow different
behaviour inside and outside the loop pipeline.
We want a cleaner way to allow passes to run correctly inside and outside the
loop pipeline.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503478-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:36:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503478-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29520 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:36:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18633 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:36:11 -0000
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68499] Unclear STDC FP_CONTRACT behavior in non-standard modes
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68499-4-vXoEtlDXJm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02405.txt.bz2
Content-length: 308
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68499
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> ---
Well, actually the pragma is ignored in all cases. The fix was to set the
default to OFF in the standard modes. So, currently, one should get a warning
in non-standard modes.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503480-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:37:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503480-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83676 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:37:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83603 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:37:21 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68484-4-0iEUxxwrCX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02407.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> As the summary mentions 'volatile' I'll also point to the implementation of
> the intrinsics which have
>
> /* Store four SPFP values. The address must be 16-byte aligned. */
> extern __inline void __attribute__((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__,
> __artificial__))
> _mm_store_ps (float *__P, __m128 __A)
> {
> *(__v4sf *)__P = (__v4sf)__A;
> }
>
> so they are not using a volatile qualified type to access *__P which means
> the stores are not considered volatile by GCC.
>
> The arguments about strict-aliasing requirements still hold, only __m128 is
> declared as __may_alias__:
>
> /* The Intel API is flexible enough that we must allow aliasing with other
> vector types, and their scalar components. */
> typedef float __m128 __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16), __may_alias__));
>
> /* Internal data types for implementing the intrinsics. */
> typedef float __v4sf __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
>
> so the v4sf store has regular TBAA rules applied (and the __may_alias__ on
> the by value passed __A has no effect).
>
> -> target "bug", but I'd say an INVALID one.
>
> HJ, I remember the "master" copy of the intrinsics documentation is
> somewhere at Intel - what does that say to the two above issues?
>
> Thus all of this boils down to the question whether the intrinsics are
> implemented correctly (as documented). The volatile part of it would
> mean to either pessimize all users or that we can't implement the
> intrinsics as C functions.
_mm_store_ps is documented in Intel SDM for movaps. It doesn't say
anything about aliasing.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503482-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:38:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503482-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116305 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:38:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113089 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:38:43 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68500] Remove in_loop_pipeline usage
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68500-4-kqzWvKXGfu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02409.txt.bz2
Content-length: 234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36809
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36809&action=edit
Tentative patch: Add PROP_scev
>From gcc-bugs-return-503481-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:38:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503481-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88724 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:38:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85906 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:38:14 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68500] Remove in_loop_pipeline usage
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68500-4-gYuSkXGJKF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02408.txt.bz2
Content-length: 286
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36808&action=edit
Tentative patch: "Don't reapply loops flags if unnecessary in
loop_optimizer_init"
>From gcc-bugs-return-503483-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:39:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503483-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124552 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:39:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124525 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:39:21 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68500] Remove in_loop_pipeline usage
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68500-4-m1xzcHl6zd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02410.txt.bz2
Content-length: 251
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36810
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36810&action=edit
Tentative patch: Add PROP_loops_normal_re_lcssa
>From gcc-bugs-return-503484-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:39:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503484-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125361 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:39:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125302 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:39:44 -0000
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/20785] Pragma STDC * (C99 FP) unimplemented
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-20785-4-JI79BQGLSr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-20785-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-20785-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02411.txt.bz2
Content-length: 783
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> ---
For the STDC FENV_ACCESS pragma specifically, there is PR34678.
For the STDC FP_CONTRACT pragma, there is PR37845, which was fixed by r204460,
though things could be improved in the future as the pragma is actually
ignored: it's just that the default is now OFF in standard modes to be C99/C11
conforming. In the non-standard modes, one now misses the warning: PR68499.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503485-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:40:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503485-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13918 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:40:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10153 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 12:40:55 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68500] Remove in_loop_pipeline usage
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68500-4-7JIe2X28Un@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02412.txt.bz2
Content-length: 277
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02634.html
Last two patches fyi-posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02688.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-503486-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 12:58:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503486-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116994 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 12:58:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116966 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 12:58:45 -0000
From: "kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68001] [cilkplus] ICE in cp_gimplify_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:760
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68001-4-idAFBb8Y8O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02413.txt.bz2
Content-length: 891
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68001
--- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Nov 23 12:58:12 2015
New Revision: 230755
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230755&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68001
gcc/c-family
PR c++/68001
* c-gimplify.c (c_gimplify_expr): Stop the process if see an error.
* cilk.c (recognize_spawn): Determine location in a more precise
way.
gcc/cp
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_expr): Stop the process if see an error.
gcc/testsuite
* g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/pr68001.cc: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/pr68001.cc
Modified:
trunk/gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.c
trunk/gcc/c-family/cilk.c
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503487-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:00:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503487-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120529 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:00:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120432 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:00:23 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68484-4-xvhxMR58qt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02414.txt.bz2
Content-length: 540
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
clang has:
static __inline__ void __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS
_mm_storel_epi64(__m128i *__p, __m128i __a)
{
struct __mm_storel_epi64_struct {
long long __u;
} __attribute__((__packed__, __may_alias__));
((struct __mm_storel_epi64_struct*)__p)->__u = __a[0];
}
It doesn't prove anything, this is just a point of comparison.
(I haven't checked, but I suspect that they have an implicit may_alias on all
vector types)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503488-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:08:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503488-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109237 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:08:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108981 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 13:08:51 -0000
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68499] Unclear STDC FP_CONTRACT behavior in non-standard modes
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68499-4-xSGtKXTL9b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02415.txt.bz2
Content-length: 214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68499
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
Unknown pragmas are diagnosed with -Wunknown-pragmas (part of -Wall).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503489-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:23:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503489-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32021 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:23:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31956 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:23:06 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68221-4-czYAmFFG7r@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02416.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c (revision 230671)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c (working copy)
@@ -750,8 +750,11 @@ copy_reference_ops_from_ref (tree ref, v
case MEM_REF:
/* The base address gets its own vn_reference_op_s structure. */
temp.op0 = TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1);
- if (tree_fits_shwi_p (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1)))
- temp.off = tree_to_shwi (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 1));
+ {
+ offset_int off = mem_ref_offset (ref);
+ if (wi::fits_shwi_p (off))
+ temp.off = off.to_shwi ();
+ }
temp.clique = MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE (ref);
temp.base = MR_DEPENDENCE_BASE (ref);
temp.reverse = REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER (ref);
>From gcc-bugs-return-503490-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:25:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503490-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104621 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:25:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104522 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:25:29 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68221-4-k91wtQ16p7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02417.txt.bz2
Content-length: 494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503491-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:26:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503491-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105746 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:26:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105702 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:26:23 -0000
From: "boger at us dot ibm.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/66574] Time is provided in millisecond precision instead of nanoseconds as described in go documentation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: boger at us dot ibm.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66574-4-AFSzsRpcwY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02418.txt.bz2
Content-length: 215
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66574
--- Comment #6 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #5)
> Fixed on mainline.
Can this be backported to the gcc 5 branch?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503492-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:39:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503492-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26829 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:39:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26768 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:39:29 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/68470] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal Compiler Error observed by g++-4.9.2 and a few other versions (reported to Debian)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68470-4-L2fCeoVdTk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02419.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3671
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #3)
> A bit simplified testcase:
>
> void deallocate(void *);
> void *a;
>
> struct C {
> virtual void m_fn1();
> };
>
> struct D {
> C *m_fn2() {
> if (a)
> __builtin_abort();
> }
> };
> D getd();
>
> struct vec_int {
> int _M_start;
> ~vec_int() {
> if (_M_start)
> deallocate(&_M_start);
> }
> };
> vec_int *b;
>
> struct I {
> virtual void m_fn3();
> };
>
> void I::m_fn3() {
> if (a)
> getd().m_fn2()->m_fn1();
> b->~vec_int();
> }
>
> $ cc1plus -O2 test.cc - ICE after fnsplit
> $ cc1plus -O2 test.cc -fno-checking - ICE in IPA-ICF (like in the original
> bug report)
> $ cc1plus -O2 test.cc -fno-devirtualize - OK
> $ cc1plus -O2 test.cc --param partial-inlining-entry-probability=0 - OK
>
> ISTM, this is some IPA-related issue:
> D::m_fn2 and vec_int::~vec_int are inlined into I::m_fn3.
> D::m_fn2 (D::operator-> in previous comments) does not return any value
> (undefined behavior), so gimple_fold_call devirtualizes
> getd().m_fn2()->m_fn1() into __builtin_unreachable during fwprop1.
> fnsplit then tries to split I::m_fn3. This is how the function looks before
> fnsplit:
>
> ;; Function virtual void I::m_fn3() (_ZN1I5m_fn3Ev, funcdef_no=4,
> decl_uid=2299, cgraph_uid=4, symbol_order=6)
>
> virtual void I::m_fn3() (struct I * const this)
> {
> struct C * D.2356;
> void * a.0_3;
> void * a.2_5;
> struct vec_int * b.1_12;
> int _14;
> int * _15;
>
> <bb 2>:
> a.0_3 = a;
> if (a.0_3 != 0B)
> goto <bb 3>;
> else
> goto <bb 6>;
>
> <bb 3>:
> getd ();
> a.2_5 = a;
> if (a.2_5 != 0B)
> goto <bb 4>;
> else
> goto <bb 5>;
>
> <bb 4>:
> __builtin_abort ();
>
> <bb 5>:
> __builtin_unreachable ();
>
> <bb 6>:
> b.1_12 = b;
> _14 = b.1_12->_M_start;
> if (_14 != 0)
> goto <bb 7>;
> else
> goto <bb 8>;
>
> <bb 7>:
> _15 = &b.1_12->_M_start;
> deallocate (_15);
>
> <bb 8>:
> MEM[(struct &)b.1_12] ={v} {CLOBBER};
> return;
>
> }
>
> The splitting pass tries to do this:
>
> Splitting function at:
> Split point at BB 6
> header time: 19646 header size: 10
> split time: 2491 split size: 6
> bbs: 6, 7
> SSA names to pass:
> Introduced new external node (void __builtin_unreachable()/18).
>
> ICE probably happens in this part:
>
> virtual void I::m_fn3() (struct I * const this)
> {
> struct C * D.2356;
> void * a.0_3;
> void * a.2_5;
>
> <bb 2>:
> a.0_3 = a;
> if (a.0_3 != 0B)
> goto <bb 3>;
> else
> goto <bb 6>;
>
> <bb 3>:
> getd ();
> a.2_5 = a;
> if (a.2_5 != 0B)
> goto <bb 4>;
> else
> goto <bb 5>;
>
> <bb 4>:
> __builtin_abort ();
>
> <bb 5>:
> __builtin_unreachable ();
>
> <bb 6>:
> I::_ZN1I5m_fn3Ev.part.1 ();
> MEM[(struct &)_12] ={v} {CLOBBER};
> return;
>
> }
Hi.
The problem is really in <bb 6>, which contains definition of 'b.1_12' that is
used in return_bb (<bb 8>). The return_bb is eventually merged with <bb 6>.
I'm not sure about proper fix, I would expect that return_bb must be pruned of
all unused stmts (that would be moved to newly created function). Any ideas?
Martin
>From gcc-bugs-return-503493-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:41:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503493-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42471 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:41:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42435 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:41:25 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-2a5crNLcZP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02420.txt.bz2
Content-length: 578
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36811
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36811&action=edit
gcc6-pr68483.patch
Untested fix.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503495-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:59:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503495-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10385 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:59:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10295 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 13:59:54 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65908] [5 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-65908-4-Xj2OZvISBo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02422.txt.bz2
Content-length: 450
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in gcc-5-branch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503494-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 13:59:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503494-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8861 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 13:59:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6997 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 13:59:12 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65908] [5 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65908-4-v2lx7ahHa8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02421.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1356
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 23 13:58:40 2015
New Revision: 230756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65908
* ipa-icf.c (sem_item::target_supports_symbol_aliases): Remove
construction of arg_types.
(sem_function::sem_function): Likewise.
(sem_function::~sem_function): Remove destruction of arg_types.
(sem_function::compatible_parm_types_p): New function.
(sem_function::equals_wpa): Reorg matching of return values
and parameter types.
(sem_function::equals_private): Reorg mathcing of argument types.
(sem_function::parse_tree_args): Remove.
(sem_function::param_used_p): New function.
* ipa-icf.h (init_wpa): Do not call it.
(parse_tree_args): Remove.
(compatible_parm_types_p): Declare.
(result_type): Remove.
(arg_types): Remove.
(param_used_p): Declare.
* g++.dg/ipa/pr65908.C: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr65908.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ipa-icf.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ipa-icf.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503496-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:26:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503496-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128845 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:26:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128779 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:26:54 -0000
From: "gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63326-4-nqffW640p1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02423.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1145
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #19 from Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> (In reply to Chen Gang from comment #17)
> > I guess the diff below should be OK, I shall give a make check test.
>
> I would rather have the C front-end behavior for C++ rather than the
> opposite way around. Because _Pragma are considered statements.
For me, this bug is related with the demands (language definition), and C need
not be part of C++.
- For me, what cc1plus has done is OK: C++ looks that it always 'likes' more
new features, and want to let the users (C++ programmer) use the language
freely and in common sense.
- But for C, if one feature is in discussing, it should not be treated as a
common features (C standard is more stricter than C++). So we need not care
about this 'bug' quite much (In real world, C programmers need not use #pragma
in this way).
In our case (this cc1 'bug'), Instead of returning the 'anbisous' result (it
may cause misunderstanding for C/C++ programmers more or less), cc1 need report
error during compiling.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503498-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:27:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503498-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5305 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:27:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5253 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:27:54 -0000
From: "gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63326-4-fkpkzidsOP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02425.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1145
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #20 from Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> (In reply to Chen Gang from comment #17)
> > I guess the diff below should be OK, I shall give a make check test.
>
> I would rather have the C front-end behavior for C++ rather than the
> opposite way around. Because _Pragma are considered statements.
For me, this bug is related with the demands (language definition), and C need
not be part of C++.
- For me, what cc1plus has done is OK: C++ looks that it always 'likes' more
new features, and want to let the users (C++ programmer) use the language
freely and in common sense.
- But for C, if one feature is in discussing, it should not be treated as a
common features (C standard is more stricter than C++). So we need not care
about this 'bug' quite much (In real world, C programmers need not use #pragma
in this way).
In our case (this cc1 'bug'), Instead of returning the 'anbisous' result (it
may cause misunderstanding for C/C++ programmers more or less), cc1 need report
error during compiling.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503497-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:27:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503497-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4499 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:27:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4405 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:27:40 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-ILIrLhOj3Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02424.txt.bz2
Content-length: 328
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #3)
> Looks like a duplicate of PR68327. r230743 fixed 465.tonto build for me.
r230743 still fails for me. Can you show me your linking command line
for 465.tonto build?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503499-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:42:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503499-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77928 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:42:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77895 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:42:05 -0000
From: "vvsed at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: vvsed at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68484-4-3HS8VswfkU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02426.txt.bz2
Content-length: 214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Sedach <vvsed at hotmail dot com> ---
The "store" pointer could be not only volatile, but also static or global with
same error.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503500-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:43:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503500-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82314 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:43:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82190 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:43:12 -0000
From: "afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68501] New: [6 Regression] sqrt builtin is not used anymore
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcctarget attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02427.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2208
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68501
Bug ID: 68501
Summary: [6 Regression] sqrt builtin is not used anymore
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
CC: izamyatin at gmail dot com, rsandifo at redhat dot com,
ysrumyan at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-*-*
Created attachment 36812
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36812&action=edit
A reproducer
For the attached reproducer compiled with g++ -mavx -Ofast we do not use IA
sqrt builtin since r230492 thus emitting more insns.
r230491
.L8:
vmovaps (%r14,%rax), %ymm0
addl $1, %r12d
vmovups 0(%r13,%rax), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $0x1, 16(%r13,%rax), %ymm1, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm1, %ymm1, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
vaddps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm1
vrsqrtps %ymm1, %ymm2
vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm0
vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
vaddps %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
vmovups %xmm0, (%r10,%rax)
vextractf128 $0x1, %ymm0, 16(%r10,%rax)
addq $32, %rax
cmpl %r12d, %r9d
ja .L8
r230492
.L8:
.L8:
vmovaps (%r14,%rax), %ymm0
addl $1, %r12d
vmovups 0(%r13,%rax), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $0x1, 16(%r13,%rax), %ymm1, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm1, %ymm1, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
vaddps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm1
vcmpneqps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm5
vrsqrtps %ymm1, %ymm0
vandps %ymm5, %ymm0, %ymm0
vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
vaddps %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
vmulps %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
vaddps %ymm1, %ymm1, %ymm1
vsubps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
vmovups %xmm0, (%r10,%rax)
vextractf128 $0x1, %ymm0, 16(%r10,%rax)
addq $32, %rax
cmpl %r12d, %r9d
ja .L8
>From gcc-bugs-return-503501-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:43:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503501-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82715 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:43:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82300 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:43:15 -0000
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68499] Unclear STDC FP_CONTRACT behavior in non-standard modes
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68499-4-eboTY3Jv06@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68499-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02428.txt.bz2
Content-length: 752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68499
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> ---
Sorry, I forgot that I had an alias gcc='gcc -Wall', so that I got a warning
for gcc, but not for gcc-snapshot. I've now changed by config to define such an
alias for each GCC command found in $PATH.
I'm closing this bug since nothing has changed concerning the warnings compared
to old GCC versions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503502-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:47:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503502-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91579 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:47:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90371 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:47:47 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66721] [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66721-4-1QOeU0ykWh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02429.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So I have a "solution" that I hope to prettify a bit still. The basic issue
is that SLP is "broken" in that it builds a tree of operations instead of a
graph.
That is, it un-CSEs all n in the testcase:
for (i = 0; i < size; ++i)
{
float n = sqrt (in[i].x * in[i].x + in[i].y * in[i].y + in[i].z *
in[i].z);
out[i].x = in[i].x / n;
out[i].y = in[i].y / n;
out[i].z = in[i].z / n;
}
which results in bloat in the SLP tree and initial vectorized code and also
cost which is good in this case. Usually with nicely vector-size aligned
things later passes can CSE all the mess again and the generated code isn't
so bad (so the costs are overly conservative). But in this case with an
"interleaving size" of 3 we end up with three vectors containing 4 groups
we'd want to CSE.
sqrt { in[0].x * in[0].x + in[0].y * in[0].y + ...,
in[0].x * ....
in[0].x * ...,
in[1].x * in[1].x + in[1].y * ... }
sqrt { ... }
sqrt { ... }
this way we avoid the permutes on the stores of course, but the lack of
CSE here makes the generated code worse (when you look at it with
-fno-vect-cost-model, the cost-model rejects the code even though it
might be profitable at a slightly larger theshold in practice).
.L5:
movups (%r8), %xmm8
addl $1, %r10d
addq $48, %r8
addq $48, %rax
movups -16(%r8), %xmm6
movups -32(%r8), %xmm7
movaps %xmm8, %xmm13
movdqa %xmm6, %xmm11
movdqa %xmm6, %xmm10
movaps %xmm6, %xmm1
movdqa %xmm7, %xmm9
movdqa %xmm7, %xmm0
movaps %xmm7, %xmm12
shufps $252, %xmm6, %xmm1
palignr $8, %xmm7, %xmm11
shufps $175, %xmm7, %xmm13
mulps %xmm1, %xmm1
movaps %xmm7, %xmm2
palignr $12, %xmm7, %xmm10
shufps $252, %xmm11, %xmm11
mulps %xmm11, %xmm11
shufps $240, %xmm7, %xmm12
shufps $252, %xmm10, %xmm10
mulps %xmm10, %xmm10
palignr $4, %xmm8, %xmm9
shufps $5, %xmm6, %xmm2
shufps $192, %xmm9, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm9
palignr $8, %xmm8, %xmm0
shufps $192, %xmm0, %xmm0
mulps %xmm0, %xmm0
mulps %xmm13, %xmm13
addps %xmm10, %xmm11
mulps %xmm12, %xmm12
movaps %xmm8, %xmm10
shufps $192, %xmm8, %xmm10
mulps %xmm10, %xmm10
mulps %xmm2, %xmm2
addps %xmm11, %xmm1
addps %xmm13, %xmm12
addps %xmm10, %xmm9
movaps %xmm3, %xmm10
addps %xmm12, %xmm2
addps %xmm9, %xmm0
rsqrtps %xmm0, %xmm9
cmpneqps %xmm0, %xmm10
andps %xmm10, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm0
movaps %xmm3, %xmm10
cmpneqps %xmm2, %xmm10
mulps %xmm0, %xmm9
mulps %xmm4, %xmm0
addps %xmm5, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm0
rsqrtps %xmm2, %xmm9
andps %xmm10, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm2
movaps %xmm3, %xmm10
cmpneqps %xmm1, %xmm10
mulps %xmm2, %xmm9
mulps %xmm4, %xmm2
addps %xmm5, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm2
rsqrtps %xmm1, %xmm9
andps %xmm10, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm1
mulps %xmm1, %xmm9
mulps %xmm4, %xmm1
addps %xmm5, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm1
rcpps %xmm0, %xmm9
mulps %xmm9, %xmm0
mulps %xmm9, %xmm0
addps %xmm9, %xmm9
subps %xmm0, %xmm9
rcpps %xmm2, %xmm0
mulps %xmm9, %xmm8
mulps %xmm0, %xmm2
movups %xmm8, -48(%rax)
mulps %xmm0, %xmm2
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
subps %xmm2, %xmm0
mulps %xmm7, %xmm0
movups %xmm0, -32(%rax)
rcpps %xmm1, %xmm0
mulps %xmm0, %xmm1
mulps %xmm0, %xmm1
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
subps %xmm1, %xmm0
mulps %xmm6, %xmm0
movups %xmm0, -16(%rax)
cmpl %r10d, %r9d
ja .L5
of course it doesn't use any blend instruction. The testcase was to
test interleaving of size 3 support which should better have used
different operations to make SLP impossible (of course the testcase
is also from real-world code which means it is a relevant regression).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503503-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:56:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503503-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127167 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:56:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127113 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 14:56:09 -0000
From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/66574] Time is provided in millisecond precision instead of nanoseconds as described in go documentation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66574-4-6TFSyNYEMG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02430.txt.bz2
Content-length: 384
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66574
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
I'm a little worried because I'm not 100% confident that clock_gettime is
available in the standard library on all systems. I don't want to break GCC 5
is that is the case. Admittedly I haven't seen any bug reports on mainline
yet, but it's only been a few days.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503504-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 14:56:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503504-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10282 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 14:56:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6494 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 14:56:38 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68363] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in recog_memoized, at recog.h:167 with RTL checking with -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 @ aarch64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68363-4-i5iv473F8b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02431.txt.bz2
Content-length: 691
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68363
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Nov 23 14:56:03 2015
New Revision: 230760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/68363 Check that argument is real INSN in
aarch64_madd_needs_nop
PR target/68363
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_madd_needs_nop): Reject arguments
that are not INSN_P.
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr68363_1.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr68363_1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503505-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:18:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503505-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59671 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:18:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59613 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 15:18:28 -0000
From: "nsz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68059] [arm] libgcc uses __write to report error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68059-4-6SInZf22Br@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02432.txt.bz2
Content-length: 553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68059
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Mon Nov 23 15:17:55 2015
New Revision: 230762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/68059 libgcc should not use __write for printing fatal error
libgcc/
PR target/68059
* config/arm/linux-atomic-64bit.c (__write): Rename to...
(write): ...this and fix the return type.
Modified:
trunk/libgcc/ChangeLog
trunk/libgcc/config/arm/linux-atomic-64bit.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:19:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66346 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:19:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65867 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:19:04 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-rpF1ZXacVM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02433.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2030
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> r230743 still fails for me. Can you show me your linking command line
> for 465.tonto build?
Here it is. Works OK for today's trunk (revision 230759).
gfortran -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto -m64 -flto=16 -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64
-march=core-avx2 -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 types.fppized.o system.fppized.o
str.fppized.o int.fppized.o real.fppized.o intvec.fppized.o realvec.fppized.o
binmat.fppized.o cpxvec.fppized.o realmat.fppized.o parallel.fppized.o
intmat.fppized.o buffer.fppized.o intvecvec.fppized.o strvec.fppized.o
binvec.fppized.o unitnumber.fppized.o textfile.fppized.o opvector.fppized.o
file.fppized.o cpxmat.fppized.o opmatrix.fppized.o archive.fppized.o
diis.fppized.o reflection.fppized.o cif.fppized.o cpxmat3.fppized.o
realmat3.fppized.o spacegroup.fppized.o slatershell.fppized.o
slatershellvec.fppized.o interpolator.fppized.o slaterbasis.fppized.o
shell1.fppized.o unitcell.fppized.o shell.fppized.o shellvec.fppized.o
basis.fppized.o coppensorbital.fppized.o coppensorbitalvec.fppized.o
coppensbasis.fppized.o atom.fppized.o reflectionvec.fppized.o rys.fppized.o
cpxmat4.fppized.o gaussian.fppized.o gaussian2.fppized.o realmat4.fppized.o
intmat3.fppized.o shell2.fppized.o atomvec.fppized.o crystal.fppized.o
scfdata.fppized.o basisvec.fppized.o realmat5.fppized.o gaussian4.fppized.o
shell4.fppized.o time.fppized.o colour.fppized.o colourfunction.fppized.o
intvecmat3.fppized.o intvecintvechash.fppized.o marchingcube.fppized.o
plotgrid.fppized.o isosurface.fppized.o realmat3vec.fppized.o cluster.fppized.o
cpxmat5.fppized.o shellpair.fppized.o shellpairvec.fppized.o
coppensbasisvec.fppized.o irrep.fppized.o irrepvec.fppized.o
pointgroup.fppized.o slaterbasisvec.fppized.o shell1quartet.fppized.o
roby.fppized.o dftgrid.fppized.o mol.fppized.o mol_main.fppized.o
run_mol.fppized.o blas.o lapack.o -o tonto
>From gcc-bugs-return-503507-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:21:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503507-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78942 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:21:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78840 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 15:21:14 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68363] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in recog_memoized, at recog.h:167 with RTL checking with -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 @ aarch64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68363-4-70TkD4Y7l9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02434.txt.bz2
Content-length: 848
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68363
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Nov 23 15:20:42 2015
New Revision: 230763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/68363 Check that argument is real INSN in
aarch64_madd_needs_nop
Backport from mainline
2015-11-23 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR target/68363
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_madd_needs_nop): Reject arguments
that are not INSN_P.
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr68363_1.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr68363_1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503508-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:22:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503508-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86827 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:22:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86546 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 15:22:04 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68465] pass_lim doesn't detect identical loop entry conditions
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68465-4-fV1kFXqU1C@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02435.txt.bz2
Content-length: 736
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68465
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 23 15:21:32 2015
New Revision: 230764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68465
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (sccvn_dom_walker::before_dom_children):
Also record equalities from multiple predecessor blocks if
only one non-backedge exists.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-52.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-52.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503509-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:24:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503509-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94464 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:24:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94427 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:24:22 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68465] pass_lim doesn't detect identical loop entry conditions
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68465-4-tHkL8xDzo7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02436.txt.bz2
Content-length: 197
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68465
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed the issue where this originally was observed in (oacc-kernel passes)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503510-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:25:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503510-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96345 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:25:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96229 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:25:18 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68498] Replace LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES with LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68498-4-Ex7xRHlshG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02437.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68498
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503511-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:26:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503511-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98674 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:26:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98628 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 15:26:08 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68363] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in recog_memoized, at recog.h:167 with RTL checking with -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 @ aarch64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68363-4-AKld0pcTPK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02438.txt.bz2
Content-length: 857
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68363
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Nov 23 15:25:36 2015
New Revision: 230765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230765&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/68363 Check that argument is real INSN in
aarch64_madd_needs_nop
Backport from mainline
2015-11-23 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR target/68363
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_madd_needs_nop): Reject arguments
that are not INSN_P.
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr68363_1.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr68363_1.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503512-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:26:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503512-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99473 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:26:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99442 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:26:31 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68363] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in recog_memoized, at recog.h:167 with RTL checking with -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 @ aarch64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68363-4-xfH1OYPqlp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02439.txt.bz2
Content-length: 419
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68363
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on all active branches
>From gcc-bugs-return-503513-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:27:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503513-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102480 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:27:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102407 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:26:57 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68501] [6 Regression] sqrt builtin is not used anymore
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68501-4-GVev9LwaHl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02440.txt.bz2
Content-length: 594
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68501
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yep, I also saw this. IIRC the recip pass is responsible for this.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503514-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:29:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503514-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109070 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:29:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109014 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:29:39 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-8DgizkkCnL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02441.txt.bz2
Content-length: 781
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for filing; I can reproduce.
Failing assertion at line 340:
337 bool
338 layout_range::contains_point (int row, int column) const
339 {
340 gcc_assert (m_start.m_line <= m_finish.m_line);
>From gcc-bugs-return-503515-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:40:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503515-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39565 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:40:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39393 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:40:37 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-gjoGtuRuJL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02442.txt.bz2
Content-length: 998
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's attempting to print this source range:
(gdb) p *range
$8 = {m_start = {m_line = 13, m_column = 12},
m_finish = {m_line = 6, m_column = 26},
m_show_caret_p = true,
m_caret = {m_line = 13, m_column = 12}}
i.e. (after dealing with tabs):
0000000001111111111222222222233333333334444444444555555555566666666667
1234567890123456879012345687901234568790123456879012345687901234568790
1 /* { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret -mno-fp-ret-in-387" } */
2
3 #include <math.h>
4
5 #define TEST_EQ(FUNC) do { \
6 if ((long)FUNC##l(xl,xl) != (long)xl) \
^FINISH
7 return; \
8 } while (0)
9
10 void
11 foo (long double xl)
12 {
13 TEST_EQ (fmin);
^
START&CARET
14 }
>From gcc-bugs-return-503516-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:42:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503516-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47249 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:42:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47197 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:42:26 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-kFpK2b0ga7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02443.txt.bz2
Content-length: 256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oops; I think line 6 above should read:
6 if ((long)FUNC##l(xl,xl) != (long)xl) \
^FINISH
>From gcc-bugs-return-503517-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:48:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503517-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96565 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:48:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96447 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:48:11 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-W2JvWEzHxY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02444.txt.bz2
Content-length: 613
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > r230743 still fails for me. Can you show me your linking command line
> > for 465.tonto build?
>
> Here it is. Works OK for today's trunk (revision 230759).
>
> gfortran -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto -m64 -flto=16 -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64
> -march=core-avx2 -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 types.fppized.o system.fppized.o
It is different from my bug report. Please use the same command line as
mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503518-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:53:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503518-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129507 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:53:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129011 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:53:04 -0000
From: "izamyatin at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68502] New: [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: izamyatin at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02445.txt.bz2
Content-length: 888
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
Bug ID: 68502
Summary: [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after
r222914
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: izamyatin at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
There is a segmentation fault during execution
r222914 is:
r222914 | rguenth | 2015-05-08 18:13:55 +0300 (Fri, 08 May 2015) | 15 lines
Changed paths:
M /trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
M /trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
A /trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-41.c
M /trunk/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
M /trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
Options I used - -m32 -static -O3 -mfpmath=sse -march=core-avx2
-m64 is ok
>From gcc-bugs-return-503519-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:56:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503519-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4451 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:56:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4398 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 15:56:30 -0000
From: "rth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67089] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Integer overflow checks not optimized on x86/x86_64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: rth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67089-4-rxllstVYma@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02446.txt.bz2
Content-length: 856
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Nov 23 15:55:58 2015
New Revision: 230767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add uaddv4_optab and usubv4_optab
PR target/67089
* optabs.def (uaddv4_optab, usubv4_optab): New.
* internal-fn.c (expand_addsub_overflow): Use uaddv4_optab
and usubv4_optab in the u +- u -> u case.
* doc/md.texi (Standard Names): Document addv{m}4, subv{m}4,
mulv{m}4, uaddv{m}4, usubv{m}4, umulv{m}4.
* config/i386/i386.md (uaddv<SWI>4, usubv<SWI>4): New.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
trunk/gcc/doc/md.texi
trunk/gcc/internal-fn.c
trunk/gcc/optabs.def
>From gcc-bugs-return-503520-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 15:57:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503520-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5352 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 15:57:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5311 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 15:57:03 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-PRnNw3p0aD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02447.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1543
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, I was wrong again.
The locus and start of the range are here:
(gdb) call
inform(line_table->location_adhoc_data_map.data[0x17].src_range.m_start,
"m_start")
pr68473-1.c:13:12: note: m_start
TEST_EQ (fmin); /* { dg-error "x87 register return with x87 disabled" } */
^
pr68473-1.c:6:13: note: in definition of macro ‘TEST_EQ’
if ((long)FUNC##l(xl,xl) != (long)xl) \
^~~~
and the finish of the range is here:
(gdb) call
inform(line_table->location_adhoc_data_map.data[0x17].src_range.m_finish,
"m_finish")
pr68473-1.c:6:26: note: m_finish
if ((long)FUNC##l(xl,xl) != (long)xl) \
^
pr68473-1.c:13:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘TEST_EQ’
TEST_EQ (fmin); /* { dg-error "x87 register return with x87 disabled" } */
^~~~~~~
via:
Breakpoint 2, error (gmsgid=0x1897930 "x87 register return with x87 disabled")
at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:1153
1153 rich_location richloc (line_table, input_location);
(gdb) p /x input_location
$2 = 0x80000017
(gdb) p line_table->location_adhoc_data_map.data[0x17]
$3 = {locus = 2147442627, src_range = {m_start = 2147442627, m_finish =
2147442633}, data = 0x0}
(gdb) p /x line_table->location_adhoc_data_map.data[0x17].src_range.m_start
$5 = 0x7fff5fc3
(gdb) p /x line_table->location_adhoc_data_map.data[0x17].src_range.m_finish
$6 = 0x7fff5fc9
>From gcc-bugs-return-503521-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 16:27:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503521-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10385 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 16:27:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10308 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 16:27:14 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66573] Unexpected change in static, branch-prediction cost from O1 to O2 in if-then-else.
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66573-4-JxKfes4BFp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02448.txt.bz2
Content-length: 454
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC thinks bar2 will be executed more often that bar1; the code
it generates is perfectly fine for that.
If you think GCC's heuristics for branch prediction are no good,
could use some improvement, you'll have to come up with more
evidence than just a single artificial testcase. Sorry. These
things were tuned on real code.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503522-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 16:45:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503522-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11038 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 16:45:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10992 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 16:45:47 -0000
From: "vvsed at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: vvsed at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68484-4-um6zLCM7IR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02449.txt.bz2
Content-length: 381
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Sedach <vvsed at hotmail dot com> ---
Adding "static" to "volatile" "solves" the problem:
static int * volatile x = _x;
I'm using this trick to avoid aggressive optimization when measuring the time
of execution. The compiler does not skip calculations leading to saving the
result in a loop.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503523-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:11:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503523-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80911 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:11:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80835 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:11:34 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority
Message-ID: <bug-67714-4-mARvGbHOOV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02450.txt.bz2
Content-length: 391
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Changing to P1 as it is a wrong-code regression affecting arm
>From gcc-bugs-return-503524-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:17:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503524-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118565 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:17:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118512 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:17:33 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68279] ICE: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:836
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68279-4-UxKr3MKs3Q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02451.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1568
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
After fixing the graphite fail, I get these warnings from the testcase in
comment4:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:21:19: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:22:25: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:22:41: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:22:29: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:22:75: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:22:86: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:24:27: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:24:36: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:25:16: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
/work/spop/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:25:34: Warning:
Legacy Extension: REAL array index at (1)
Is there a flag I can set to avoid these warnings?
Thanks!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503526-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:19:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503526-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122773 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:19:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122710 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:19:27 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68455] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68455-4-Yj8fUw9Vpj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02453.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503525-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:19:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503525-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121929 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:19:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121896 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 17:19:08 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68455] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68455-4-R41kVEFk3D@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68455-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02452.txt.bz2
Content-length: 634
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 23 17:18:36 2015
New Revision: 230768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68455
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_binary_expr_1): Don't call
extract_range_from_multiplicative_op_1 on symbolic ranges.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68455.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68455.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503527-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:21:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503527-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125353 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:21:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125297 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:21:53 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68279] ICE: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:836
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68279-4-LfXNfWaTup@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02454.txt.bz2
Content-length: 428
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #5)
> After fixing the graphite fail, I get these warnings from the testcase in
thanks, these are due to reducing the testcase stripping variable definitions.
> Is there a flag I can set to avoid these warnings?
gfortran -c -std=legacy t.f90
>From gcc-bugs-return-503528-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:32:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503528-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57232 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:32:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57144 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:32:05 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68493] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE in copy_loop_phi_args
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68493-4-XPRIyqohyD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02455.txt.bz2
Content-length: 655
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Passes on ISL 0.14, fails with 0.15.
This patch fixes it: we will bootstrap and commit.
diff --git a/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
b/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
index 30c3a21..2783ac4 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
@@ -2760,6 +2760,8 @@ translate_isl_ast_to_gimple::translate_pending_phi_nodes
()
fprintf (dump_file, "[codegen] to new-phi: ");
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, new_phi, 0, 0);
}
+ if (codegen_error)
+ return;
}
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503529-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:44:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503529-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79577 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:44:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79519 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:44:50 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68314] [6 Regression] Invalid read in build_pbb_minimal_scattering_polyhedrons (graphite-sese-to-poly.c:148)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68314-4-8LkvmQYYY6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02456.txt.bz2
Content-length: 427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with ISL 0.15.
I'm looking at it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503530-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:54:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503530-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104955 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:54:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101668 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:54:18 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-2SQtWRddNi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02457.txt.bz2
Content-length: 217
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've posted a candidate patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02771.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-503531-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:58:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503531-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84206 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 17:58:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77285 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 17:58:46 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-hoktu4CCSv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02458.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1240
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21)
> > Hidden behind a -fexternal-blas-n switch might be an option. Including GPUs
> > seems even a tad more tricky. We have a paper on GPU (small) matrix
> > multiplication, http://dbcsr.cp2k.org/_media/gpu_book_chapter_submitted.pdf
>
> Quite interesting what can be done with GPUs...
>
Run of the mill graphics processing units have many floating point compute
cores. 128 cores is not unusual, usually a lot more. These cores perform basic
things like a + b * c on scalars. and other useful functions. Softwares like
OpenCL will compile compute kernels which will run efficiently in parallel on
these GPU architectures. clBLAS is a runtime library which encapsulates this
capability with a BLAS compatible API. Conceptually you initialize for
particular matrices and hand of the work to the GPU.
My low end laptop (300 dollar variety) is running an nbody 3D model with
several thousand masses without even pressing the CPU as an example. MATMUL
should be doable.
The main GPU competitors are Nvidia, AMD. and Intel. OpenCL is supported on all
three.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503532-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 18:01:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503532-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2053 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 18:01:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1978 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 18:01:45 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-48298-4-GyfGTcZEK4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48298-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48298-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02459.txt.bz2
Content-length: 661
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 08:10:19PM +0000, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Attached is an expanded test case. Could someone review and confirm this is
> valid. I need to work some code in interface.c to eliminate an error I am
> getting and want to make sure the error is valid or not.
>
I don't know DTIO, so can't be of much help. You amy want to
post the example to comp.lang.fortran. You'll likely get more
then enough opinions on the code. Posters in clf may even give
you some difficult testcases.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503533-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 18:07:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503533-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15493 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 18:07:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15458 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 18:07:32 -0000
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55077] implement and enable by default -Wliteral-conversion
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55077-4-M18Ujhtt4Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02460.txt.bz2
Content-length: 933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55077
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5)
> Created attachment 33637 [details]
> untested patch
>
> Untested patch. Bonus points if we show the value before and after
> conversion like clang does.
I tried out the patch by building a test compiler and
then building the current Linux kernel.
Trivial problem with doubled tokens (&& &&), but the main problem is that the
patch doesn't fix the problem I described of double and float literals
into integral types.
Also, plenty of false positives for integer into smaller integral types,
for example integer into short or integer into char.
For example, the patch warns for this reasonable code:
charVariable = 0x80;
As is, I would not use the patch, but maybe with some further work,
it might be suitable for future use.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503534-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 18:12:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503534-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28531 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 18:12:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28297 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 18:12:16 -0000
From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68496] [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68496-4-aO10dwq9YU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02461.txt.bz2
Content-length: 675
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68496
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
I can not recreate this problem. It works fine for me.
The stack trace is incomplete for some reason so I don't know what is going
wrong.
If you cd into x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo, you can run
make GOTESTFLAGS="--keep" reflect/check
Presumably that will fail. It will leave behind a gotestNNNN directory. In
that directory you will find an a.out executable. Running that executable runs
the test (you may have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that it finds libgo.so). Try
running that executable under gdb and see if you can get a better backtrace.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503535-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 18:27:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503535-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64498 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 18:27:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64131 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 18:27:09 -0000
From: "jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67550] [5/6 regression] Initialization of local struct array with elements of global array yields zeros instead of initializer values
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67550-4-J0Av6DzLhq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02462.txt.bz2
Content-length: 821
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
--- Comment #5 from Jason Wyatt <jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com> ---
When parsing the initialisation of const TestStruct var:
store_init_value ends up calling split_nonconstant_init, so that only the
constant part of the initialisation of var is stored in DECL_INITIAL(t).
Then when parsing the initialisation of the array, maybe_constant_init
eventually calls through to decl_constant_value(t), i.e. constant_value_1(t,
false, true). That then uses DECL_INITIAL(t) as if it were the whole
initialisation, rather than just the constant part, hence all the non constant
parts aren't initialised correctly.
I've got no idea how this is supposed to work though, presumably at some point
in the chain of calls it's supposed to realise this is not a constant?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503536-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 18:34:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503536-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73750 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 18:34:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73641 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 18:34:06 -0000
From: "ismail at i10z dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68496] [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ismail at i10z dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68496-4-lhCL4og3wQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02463.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2047
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68496
--- Comment #2 from İsmail Dönmez <ismail at i10z dot com> ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1)
> I can not recreate this problem. It works fine for me.
>
> The stack trace is incomplete for some reason so I don't know what is going
> wrong.
>
> If you cd into x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgo, you can run
> make GOTESTFLAGS="--keep" reflect/check
> Presumably that will fail. It will leave behind a gotestNNNN directory. In
> that directory you will find an a.out executable. Running that executable
> runs the test (you may have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that it finds
> libgo.so). Try running that executable under gdb and see if you can get a
> better backtrace.
Try export MALLOC_CHECK_=2 before testing. Backtrace shows an invalid free:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f8d36c51d38 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:55
#1 0x00007f8d36c5318a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:78
#2 0x00007f8d36c960b0 in malloc_printerr (action=<optimized out>,
str=0x7f8d36d840fa "free(): invalid pointer", ptr=<optimize
d out>, ar_ptr=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:5004
#3 0x0000000000433298 in reflect.call.N13_reflect.Value
(pointer=pointer@entry=0xc2080c56a0, op=..., param=...) at value.go:4
50
#4 0x00000000004328d4 in reflect.Call.N13_reflect.Value
(pointer=pointer@entry=0x7f8d33da0c40, in=...) at value.go:300
#5 0x000000000044ec3a in reflect_test.TestCallWithStruct (t=<optimized out>)
at all_test.go:1492
#6 0x00007f8d37e6f71c in testing.tRunner (test=0xc20807a318, param=<optimized
out>) at ../../../libgo/go/testing/testing.go:4
55
#7 testing.$thunk15 (__go_thunk_parameter=<optimized out>) at
../../../libgo/go/testing/testing.go:560
#8 0x00007f8d37d8fa9c in kickoff () at ../../../libgo/runtime/proc.c:235
#9 0x00007f8d3812a135 in __morestack () at
../../../libgcc/config/i386/morestack.S:544
#10 0x00007f8d36c62900 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>From gcc-bugs-return-503537-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:07:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503537-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92295 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:07:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92073 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:07:18 -0000
From: "lvqcl.mail at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lvqcl.mail at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-gLsPSnX6oq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02464.txt.bz2
Content-length: 422
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
--- Comment #6 from lvqcl.mail at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> With i?86 I can confirm your observation but I don't see it fixed on trunk.
Sorry, the GCC 6.x compiler that I downloaded was built with --with-arch=core2
option, so it implicitely enables ssse3. That's why I incorrectly thought that
the regression was fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503538-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:26:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503538-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24733 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:26:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23382 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 19:26:06 -0000
From: "meissner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67808] LRA ICEs on simple double to long double conversion test case
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67808-4-nKq1g7aAlf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02465.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1797
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67808
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner <meissner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Nov 23 19:25:32 2015
New Revision: 230769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-11-23 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Backport from mainline
2015-10-05 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/67808
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (extenddftf2): In the expander, only
allow registers, but provide insns for the combiner to create for
loads from memory. Separate VSX code from non-VSX code. For
non-VSX code, combine extenddftf2_fprs into extenddftf2 and rename
externaldftf2_internal to externaldftf2_fprs. Reorder constraints
so that registers come before memory operations. Drop support from
converting DFmode to TFmode, if the DFmode value is in a GPR
register.
(extenddftf2_fprs): Likewise.
(extenddftf2_internal): Likewise.
(extenddftf2_vsx): Likewise.
(extendsftf2): In the expander, only allow registers, but provide
insns for the combiner to create for stores and loads.
[gcc/testsuite]
2015-11-23 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-05 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/67808
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr67808.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr67808.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503539-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:32:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503539-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64361 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:32:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64291 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:32:40 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68493] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE in copy_loop_phi_args
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68493-4-9Nvs5o89mH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02466.txt.bz2
Content-length: 432
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed in r230772.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503540-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:34:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503540-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90345 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:34:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90202 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:34:02 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68279] ICE: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:836
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68279-4-W4mADLTCzx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02467.txt.bz2
Content-length: 431
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in r230771
>From gcc-bugs-return-503541-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:36:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503541-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94895 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:36:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94824 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:36:42 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/59828] Broken assembly on ppc* with two -mcpu= options
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-59828-4-KC7JVUhatL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59828-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59828-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02468.txt.bz2
Content-length: 589
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|5.3 |6.0
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed; no backport to 5 planned.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503542-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:43:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503542-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118018 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:43:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117928 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:43:05 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/59302] tsan: Unexpected mmap in InternalAllocator!
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-59302-4-JMqy5u9CWA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02469.txt.bz2
Content-length: 509
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59302
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
I suppose this is fixed by now, haven't seen it again.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503543-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:45:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503543-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122338 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:45:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122272 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:45:39 -0000
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67071] GCC misses an optimization to load vector constants
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67071-4-UZwC3yjEGH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67071-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67071-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02470.txt.bz2
Content-length: 493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67071
David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503544-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 19:59:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503544-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21478 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 19:59:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21446 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 19:59:27 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/36358] -mvrsave / -mno-vrsave ignored
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-36358-4-FMKZTrxHuR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-36358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-36358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02471.txt.bz2
Content-length: 547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36358
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is long fixed. Thanks for the report.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503545-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:02:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503545-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30921 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:02:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30861 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:02:34 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68314] [6 Regression] Invalid read in build_pbb_minimal_scattering_polyhedrons (graphite-sese-to-poly.c:148)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68314-4-Obx4kHdqIk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02472.txt.bz2
Content-length: 742
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This patch exposes the problem without valgrind:
diff --git a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
index 2054fad..b932dae 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ build_pbb_minimal_scattering_polyhedrons (isl_aff
*static_sched, poly_bb_p pbb,
/* False for loop dimension. */
sequence_and_loop_dims[i + j] = false;
}
+
+ gcc_assert (nb_sequence_dim > j);
+
/* Fake loops make things shifted by one. */
if (sequence_dims && sequence_dims[j] == i)
sequence_and_loop_dims[i + j] = true;
>From gcc-bugs-return-503546-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:10:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503546-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41564 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:10:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41499 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:10:12 -0000
From: "arnout at mind dot be" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68476] microblaze: compilation of btSoftBody.cpp doesn't terminate with optimisation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: arnout at mind dot be
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68476-4-FziTJwk2lA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02473.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2661
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68476
--- Comment #2 from Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout at mind dot be> ---
Created attachment 36813
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36813&action=edit
Preprocessed source file that exposes the bug
Attached preprocessed source file.
Compilation output (with gcc 4.9.3; I also tried with 5.2.0 with the same
result):
$
../../../../host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu-g++.br_real
-O1 -g -c -v btSoftBody.ii
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=../../../../host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu-g++.br_real
Target: microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu
Configured with: ./configure
--prefix=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/usr
--sysconfdir=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/etc --enable-static
--target=microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu
--with-sysroot=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/usr/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot
--disable-__cxa_atexit --with-gnu-ld --disable-libssp --disable-multilib
--with-gmp=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/usr
--with-mpfr=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/usr
--with-pkgversion='Buildroot 2015.11-git-00647-gc356fb2'
--with-bugurl=http://bugs.buildroot.net/ --disable-libquadmath --enable-tls
--disable-libmudflap --enable-threads
--with-mpc=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/usr --without-isl
--without-cloog --disable-decimal-float --enable-languages=c,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/opt/br-microblaze-full-2015.08-647-gc356fb2/usr/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/bin
--enable-shared --disable-libgomp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.3 (Buildroot 2015.11-git-00647-gc356fb2)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O1' '-g' '-c' '-v' '-shared-libgcc'
/gentoo/home2/arnout/br-out/bullet/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../libexec/gcc/microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu/4.9.3/cc1plus
-fpreprocessed btSoftBody.ii -quiet -dumpbase btSoftBody.ii -auxbase btSoftBody
-g -O1 -version -o /tmp/ccHn1vcs.s
GNU C++ (Buildroot 2015.11-git-00647-gc356fb2) version 4.9.3
(microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.4.5, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version 3.1.3,
MPC version 1.0.3
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
GNU C++ (Buildroot 2015.11-git-00647-gc356fb2) version 4.9.3
(microblazeel-buildroot-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.4.5, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version 3.1.3,
MPC version 1.0.3
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: a3940dfdf166fdf4d5b4711c8bdc0b77
>From gcc-bugs-return-503547-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:16:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503547-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52329 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:16:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52291 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:16:44 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/33236] -mminimal-toc register should be psedu-register
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc
Message-ID: <bug-33236-4-krzSaqMkSo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-33236-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-33236-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02474.txt.bz2
Content-length: 465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33236
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2007-08-30 21:15:01 |2015-11-23
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Still happens.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503548-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:18:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503548-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54903 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:18:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54818 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:18:55 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-ld6z37D4cW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02475.txt.bz2
Content-length: 653
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> For what its worth:
>
> $ gfc pr51119.f90 -lblas -fno-external-blas -Ofast -march=native
> $ ./a.out
> Time, MATMUL: 21.2483196 21.254449646000001 1.5055670945599979
>
> Time, dgemm: 33.2441711 33.243087289000002 .96260614189671445
>
Running a sample matrix multiply program on this same platform using the
default OpenCL (Mesa on Fedora 22) the machine is achieving:
64 x 64 2.76 Gflops
1000 x 1000 14.10
2000 x 2000 24.4
>From gcc-bugs-return-503550-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:22:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503550-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60166 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:22:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59955 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:22:41 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-bDnROFPcW5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02477.txt.bz2
Content-length: 179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
*** Bug 68328 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503549-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:22:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503549-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60012 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:22:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59902 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:22:40 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68328] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68328-4-eahnB299uw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02476.txt.bz2
Content-length: 571
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Same issue as 68194.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68194 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503551-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:25:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503551-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64652 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:25:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64511 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:25:24 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68185-4-HZtDvwSbWt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02478.txt.bz2
Content-length: 570
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Same issue as 68194.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68194 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503552-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 20:25:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503552-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64832 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 20:25:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64569 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 20:25:25 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-KH2ylnRJjO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02479.txt.bz2
Content-length: 179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
*** Bug 68185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503553-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:00:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503553-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58392 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:00:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58301 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 21:00:46 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc/68438] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in location_adhoc_data_eq (line-map.c:89)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: objc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68438-4-9ra3mTAN1H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02480.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1079
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Nov 23 21:00:13 2015
New Revision: 230775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230775&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR objc/68438 (uninitialized source ranges)
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
PR objc/68438
* c-parser.c (c_parser_postfix_expression): Set up source ranges
for various Objective-C constructs: Class.name syntax,
@selector(), @protocol(), @encode(), and [] message syntax.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR objc/68438
* objc.dg/plugin: New subdirectory.
* objc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-test-expressions-1.m: New test file.
* objc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: New file, based on
gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/plugin/
trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-test-expressions-1.m
trunk/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp
Modified:
trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503554-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:02:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503554-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60085 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:02:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60025 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:02:23 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc/68438] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in location_adhoc_data_eq (line-map.c:89)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: objc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68438-4-XODiHcjyUY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02481.txt.bz2
Content-length: 462
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should be fixed on trunk as of r230775.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503555-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:18:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503555-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 978 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:18:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 713 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 21:18:18 -0000
From: "ian at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68496] [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68496-4-T0oCinBRGn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02482.txt.bz2
Content-length: 819
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68496
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org <ian at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Nov 23 21:17:45 2015
New Revision: 230776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/68496
reflect: Allocate space for FFI functions returning a zero-sized type.
The libffi library does not understand zero-sized types. We represent
them as a struct with a single field of type void. If such a type is
returned from a function, libffi will copy 1 byte of data. Allocate
space for that byte, although we won't use it.
Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/PR68496.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17175
Modified:
trunk/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
trunk/libgo/runtime/go-reflect-call.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503556-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:18:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503556-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2202 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:18:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1964 invoked by uid 55); 23 Nov 2015 21:18:37 -0000
From: "ian at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68496] [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68496-4-UJhIjugi5L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02483.txt.bz2
Content-length: 801
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68496
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org <ian at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Nov 23 21:18:03 2015
New Revision: 230777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/68496
reflect: Allocate space for FFI functions returning a zero-sized type.
The libffi library does not understand zero-sized types. We represent
them as a struct with a single field of type void. If such a type is
returned from a function, libffi will copy 1 byte of data. Allocate
space for that byte, although we won't use it.
Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/PR68496.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17175
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/libgo/runtime/go-reflect-call.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503557-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:19:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503557-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4465 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:19:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4400 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:19:33 -0000
From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68496] [libgo] reflect test fails on Linux x86-64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68496-4-D9RgsREVOi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68496-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02484.txt.bz2
Content-length: 479
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68496
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
Thanks for the tip. Should be fixed on mainline and GCC 5 branch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503559-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:36:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503559-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31388 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:36:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31328 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:36:08 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68322] -Wodr warning on templates should list the instantiation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68322-4-atKccD6Ze3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02486.txt.bz2
Content-length: 454
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68322
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 67677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503558-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:36:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503558-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31374 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:36:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31297 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:36:07 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67677] [6 Regression] r226005 causes "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67677-4-q6ZEBnDsa4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02485.txt.bz2
Content-length: 553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67677
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is the same as PR68332, which is easier to reproduce.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68322 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503560-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:39:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503560-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37758 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:39:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37665 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:39:08 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67677] [6 Regression] r226005 causes "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67677-4-eyLYaN1ieL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02487.txt.bz2
Content-length: 188
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67677
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68332 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:39:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38056 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:39:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37699 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:39:09 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68332] [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68332-4-HgHvcbipzH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02488.txt.bz2
Content-length: 454
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 67677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:41:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44202 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:41:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44164 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:41:42 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68322] -Wodr warning on templates should list the instantiation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68322-4-0mOWLWr92o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02489.txt.bz2
Content-length: 438
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68322
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please ignore that "dup" notice, I cannot type.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 21:49:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65328 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 21:49:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65273 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 21:49:48 -0000
From: "dd0t at users dot sourceforge.net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68479] Dynamic loading multiple shared libraries with identical static libstdc++ breaks streams
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dd0t at users dot sourceforge.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68479-4-A1EPzfXGNo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02490.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1003
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68479
--- Comment #2 from Stefan H. <dd0t at users dot sourceforge.net> ---
Interesting. So this breakage is expected behavior? I wasn't sure as there were
so many ways to load it differently that didn't seem to exhibit the problems. I
assume the ones I listed (except linking libstdc++ dynamically everywhere to
begin with) are equally forbidden?
Or in other words: Never use -static-libstdc++ in combination with -shared if
you actually need C++ objects shared between the so's and hence cannot hide or
version the symbols?
Would be very useful if libstdc++ could somehow make such conflicts more
explicit when they occur (e.g. ideally making the dynamic linker fail or even
terminating the program outright). I naively assumed I would be fine as long as
I didn't start mixing libstdc++ versions and all I would incur was some
duplicate code that simply wouldn't be used and did so until I starting seing
very strange runtime breakages.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503564-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 22:11:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503564-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20565 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 22:11:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20523 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 22:11:48 -0000
From: "geir at cray dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68261] GCC needs to use optimized version of memcpy
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: geir at cray dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68261-4-NtGx8os2mc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02491.txt.bz2
Content-length: 290
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68261
--- Comment #4 from Geir Johansen <geir at cray dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note glibc does provide a memcpy which is optimized for each target via
> ifuncs. What version of glibc are you running.
2.11.3
>From gcc-bugs-return-503565-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 22:15:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503565-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23211 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 22:15:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23163 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 22:15:06 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68261] GCC needs to use optimized version of memcpy
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68261-4-HB0yV7TR4b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02492.txt.bz2
Content-length: 494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68261
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Geir Johansen from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Note glibc does provide a memcpy which is optimized for each target via
> > ifuncs. What version of glibc are you running.
>
> 2.11.3
That is a very old release which was released before most of the modern v2/v3
were relased so no wonder you are having performance issues.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503566-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 22:18:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503566-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27229 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 22:18:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27108 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 22:18:38 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/67984] [GRAPHITE] internal compiler error: isl_ctx freed, but some objects still reference it
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67984-4-TEuVNM3Z5A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02493.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1258
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-23
CC| |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I cannot reproduce the error on GCC 6.0 trunk.
Also, please provide a reduced testcase, the attached testcase fails with:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include/immintrin.h:43:0,
from /usr/include/CL/cl_platform.h:441,
from /usr/include/CL/cl.h:30,
from /usr/include/CL/opencl.h:42,
from dcttest.c:61:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include/avx2intrin.h: In function
‘_mm256_mpsadbw_epu8’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/include/avx2intrin.h:46:12: error: can’t
convert a value of type ‘int’ to vector type ‘__vector(4) long long int’ which
has different size
>From gcc-bugs-return-503567-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 22:33:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503567-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65371 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 22:33:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65331 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 22:33:39 -0000
From: "michael.hudson at canonical dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/68503] New: [powerpc64le] miscompilation of composite literal
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: michael.hudson at canonical dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68503-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02494.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2488
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68503
Bug ID: 68503
Summary: [powerpc64le] miscompilation of composite literal
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: michael.hudson at canonical dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Running commands like this on Ubuntu trusty ppc64le:
$ go get github.com/juju/juju/...
$ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/juju/juju
$ git checkout 1.25
$ git apply << EOF
diff --git a/state/filesystem_test.go b/state/filesystem_test.go
index a7113bc..e0b20dd 100644
--- a/state/filesystem_test.go
+++ b/state/filesystem_test.go
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ func (s *FilesystemStateSuite) TestFilesystemInfo(c *gc.C)
{
// Explicitly set both MountPoint and ReadOnly to work around
// bug #1517611
- filesystemAttachmentInfo := state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo{MountPoint:
"/srv", ReadOnly: false}
+ filesystemAttachmentInfo := state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo{MountPoint:
"/srv"}
err = s.State.SetFilesystemAttachmentInfo(machineTag, filesystemTag,
filesystemAttachmentInfo)
c.Assert(err, jc.ErrorIsNil)
s.assertFilesystemAttachmentInfo(c, machineTag, filesystemTag,
filesystemAttachmentInfo)
EOF
$ go test -c -v ./state && ./state.test -gocheck.v -gocheck.f
TestFilesystemInfo
Leads to a failure along the lines of
... obtained state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo =
state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo{MountPoint:"", ReadOnly:true}
... expected state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo =
state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo{MountPoint:"", ReadOnly:true}
What's going on appears to be that the line "filesystemAttachmentInfo :=
state.FilesystemAttachmentInfo{MountPoint: "/srv"}" is copying from the wrong
place in .rodata (the part that should be a pointer to string data is actually
the string data "action-9", which is part of a composite literal in a different
file).
This error appears to be present in the GIMPLE already.
The bug does not manifest on ppc64le with a newer gccgo or on arm64 at all, so
it's probably been fixed by now -- but it also disappears if I delete seemingly
irrelevant code, so it would be nice to know how this was fixed, and that it's
not just disappeared by luck. But only nice: we don't expect to use gccgo on
ppc64le for much longer.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503568-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 22:34:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503568-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86028 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 22:34:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85991 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 22:34:44 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68460] ICE in init_stmt_vec_info_vec with -ftree-vectorize and -ftree-parallelize-loops
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68460-4-PIDRBWmxjE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68460-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68460-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02495.txt.bz2
Content-length: 438
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68460
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch and test-case committed, marking resolved-fixed
>From gcc-bugs-return-503570-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 23:25:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503570-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4213 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 23:25:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3790 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 23:25:05 -0000
From: "geir at cray dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68261] GCC needs to use optimized version of memcpy
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: geir at cray dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68261-4-zQev7y868Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02497.txt.bz2
Content-length: 630
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68261
--- Comment #6 from Geir Johansen <geir at cray dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Geir Johansen from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > Note glibc does provide a memcpy which is optimized for each target via
> > > ifuncs. What version of glibc are you running.
> >
> > 2.11.3
>
> That is a very old release which was released before most of the modern
> v2/v3 were relased so no wonder you are having performance issues.
Okay, tried GLIBC 2.19 and that version appears to have addressed the issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503569-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 23:25:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503569-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3797 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 23:25:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3583 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 23:25:01 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68479] Dynamic loading multiple shared libraries with identical static libstdc++ breaks streams
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68479-4-B8ppGli7Ec@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68479-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02496.txt.bz2
Content-length: 262
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68479
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think there is another bug about this that was closed as invalid as you need
to use the version script to hide all of libstdc++ symbols.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503571-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 23:29:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503571-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21170 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 23:29:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21107 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 23:29:29 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68314] [6 Regression] Invalid read in build_pbb_minimal_scattering_polyhedrons (graphite-sese-to-poly.c:148)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68314-4-4LTlKYFTl2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02498.txt.bz2
Content-length: 431
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed in r230778
>From gcc-bugs-return-503572-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 23 23:59:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503572-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121534 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2015 23:59:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121493 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2015 23:59:24 -0000
From: "su at cs dot ucdavis.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68506] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02499.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2380
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
Bug ID: 68506
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
Target Milestone: ---
The current gcc trunk miscompiles the following code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3
in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
This is a regression from 5.2.x.
It is likely to do with VRP as -fno-tree-vrp seems to fix the miscompilation.
It also seems difficult to further reduce the code.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151122 (experimental) [trunk revision 230719] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.2 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -fno-tree-vrp small.c
$ ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$
------------------------------------------------
int a, b, m, n, o, p, s, u, i;
char c, q, y;
short d;
unsigned char e;
static int f, h;
static short g, r, v;
unsigned t;
void __assert_fail ();
int
fn1 (int p1)
{
return a ? p1 : p1 + a;
}
unsigned char
fn2 (unsigned char p1, int p2)
{
return p2 >= 2 ? p1 : p1 >> p2;
}
static short
fn3 ()
{
int w, x = 0;
for (; p < 31; p++)
{
s = fn1 (c | ((1 && c) == c));
t = fn2 (s, x);
c = (unsigned) c > -(unsigned) ((o = (m = d = t) == p) <= 4UL) && n;
v = -c;
y = 1;
for (; y; y++)
e = v == 1;
d = 0;
for (; h != 2;)
{
for (;;)
{
if (!m)
__assert_fail ();
r = 7 - f;
x = e = i | r;
q = u * g;
w = b == q;
if (w)
break;
}
break;
}
}
return x;
}
int
main ()
{
fn3 ();
return 0;
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503573-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 00:23:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503573-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73796 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 00:23:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73753 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 00:23:32 -0000
From: "daniel.santos at pobox dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68507] New: attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping xmm6-15 needlessly
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.santos at pobox dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02500.txt.bz2
Content-length: 964
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68507
Bug ID: 68507
Summary: attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping
xmm6-15 needlessly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: daniel.santos at pobox dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36814
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36814&action=edit
simple test case
When a function declared ms_abi calls a function not (and thus, implicitly
sysv_abi on Linux) then the ms_abi function saves & restores xmm6-16 needlessly
causing quite a lot of bloat in wine.
I'm still on 4.9.3, so building (gentoo) 5.2.0 now to see if the bug is still
there. When debian released the wine 1.8-rc1 today, all of the code was bloated
like this too.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503574-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 00:26:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503574-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78684 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 00:26:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78643 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 00:26:53 -0000
From: "daniel.santos at pobox dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68507] attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping xmm6-15 needlessly
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.santos at pobox dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68507-4-mCpmGuC8LX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02501.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2088
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68507
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Santos <daniel.santos at pobox dot com> ---
Correction: xmm6-15, I can't type today. And here is the output on gcc 4.9.3:
$ objdump -dSr test_case.o
test_case.o: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <why_the_little_piggie_cried>:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4: 57 push %rdi
5: 56 push %rsi
6: 48 81 ec a0 00 00 00 sub $0xa0,%rsp
d: 0f 29 34 24 movaps %xmm6,(%rsp)
11: 0f 29 7c 24 10 movaps %xmm7,0x10(%rsp)
16: 44 0f 29 44 24 20 movaps %xmm8,0x20(%rsp)
1c: 44 0f 29 4d 80 movaps %xmm9,-0x80(%rbp)
21: 44 0f 29 55 90 movaps %xmm10,-0x70(%rbp)
26: 44 0f 29 5d a0 movaps %xmm11,-0x60(%rbp)
2b: 44 0f 29 65 b0 movaps %xmm12,-0x50(%rbp)
30: 44 0f 29 6d c0 movaps %xmm13,-0x40(%rbp)
35: 44 0f 29 75 d0 movaps %xmm14,-0x30(%rbp)
3a: 44 0f 29 7d e0 movaps %xmm15,-0x20(%rbp)
3f: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 44 <why_the_little_piggie_cried+0x44>
40: R_X86_64_PC32 wool_sweaters-0x4
44: 0f 28 34 24 movaps (%rsp),%xmm6
48: 0f 28 7c 24 10 movaps 0x10(%rsp),%xmm7
4d: 44 0f 28 44 24 20 movaps 0x20(%rsp),%xmm8
53: 44 0f 28 4d 80 movaps -0x80(%rbp),%xmm9
58: 44 0f 28 55 90 movaps -0x70(%rbp),%xmm10
5d: 44 0f 28 5d a0 movaps -0x60(%rbp),%xmm11
62: 44 0f 28 65 b0 movaps -0x50(%rbp),%xmm12
67: 44 0f 28 6d c0 movaps -0x40(%rbp),%xmm13
6c: 44 0f 28 75 d0 movaps -0x30(%rbp),%xmm14
71: 44 0f 28 7d e0 movaps -0x20(%rbp),%xmm15
76: 48 81 c4 a0 00 00 00 add $0xa0,%rsp
7d: 5e pop %rsi
7e: 5f pop %rdi
7f: 5d pop %rbp
80: c3 retq
>From gcc-bugs-return-503575-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 00:54:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503575-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102678 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 00:54:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102395 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 00:54:52 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68507] attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping xmm6-15 needlessly
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68507-4-IaN4reGM5d@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02502.txt.bz2
Content-length: 267
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68507
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think there is an ABI difference with respect of xmm6-16 between sysv ABI and
windows ABIs. Can you provide why you think this is not a bug?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503576-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 01:14:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503576-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130600 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 01:14:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130471 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 01:14:19 -0000
From: "daniel.santos at pobox dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68507] attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping xmm6-15 needlessly
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.santos at pobox dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68507-4-z2hvwfVQB2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02503.txt.bz2
Content-length: 523
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68507
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Santos <daniel.santos at pobox dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I think there is an ABI difference with respect of xmm6-16 between sysv ABI
> and windows ABIs. Can you provide why you think this is not a bug?
Ehem, uh no. I was recently informed that sysv_abi treats xmm registers as
temp, but I need to read up on this topic. If this is really true then this bug
report would be invalid (but still very sad).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503577-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 01:14:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503577-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 342 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 01:14:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130721 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 01:14:24 -0000
From: "nenad at intrepid dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nenad at intrepid dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-FtMqaSBC3p@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02504.txt.bz2
Content-length: 983
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #3 from Nenad Vukicevic <nenad at intrepid dot com> ---
We are getting a similar issue while linking a program with GCC and without
'-flto' switch. We enable 'lto' when configuring languages, which in turn
enables post ld processing inside collect2. This was done as part of the bug
#61352 patch.
As mentioned, Apple switched to LLVM based dsymtool (see tools/dsymutil on
llvm) in newer Darwins, and we did not see failures on the older systems where
I suspect some other version of dsymutil is used. Also, worth mentioning, is
that we do not get these warnings if we use Apple's LLVM based compiler, as
Clang driver does not execute dsymutil on link only jobs:
gcc -o t t.c (will execute dsymutil)
gcc -o t t.o (will NOT execute dsymutil)
On the other hand GCC always execute dsymutil.
Looking at symbols that dsymutil complains it looks like they are complaining
on local symbols with the same name.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503578-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 01:18:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503578-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4363 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 01:18:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4305 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 01:18:26 -0000
From: "arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/51494] Legal program rejection - capturing "this" when using static method inside lambda
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-51494-4-XhAn3yUZ18@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02505.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1279
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com> ---
Is there a workaround available for GCC 4.6.3?
That is, I have some code that looks like
class A {
static A *unwrap(void *p);
static void api_helper(void *p) { A *a = unwrap(p); ... }
void init() { register_with_api(&api_helper); }
};
where "api_helper" exists only to conform to the requirements of the external
API.
To reduce the surface area of the class, I'd like to refactor this into
something like
class A {
static A *unwrap(void *p);
void init() {
auto api_helper = [](void *a) { A *a = unwrap(p); ... };
register_with_api(api_helper);
}
};
but at the moment I'm hitting this bug in gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)
4.6.3 because "api_helper" happens to also want to use some static members of
A.
I understand if there's no workaround (beyond "upgrade to gcc 4.8"), but if
there IS one, I'd like to know it!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503579-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 01:23:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503579-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8373 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 01:23:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8310 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 01:23:27 -0000
From: "kainjow at kainjow dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] New: Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kainjow at kainjow dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02506.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1062
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
Bug ID: 68508
Summary: Internal compiler error with parentheses around return
value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kainjow at kainjow dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Using latest i386 ArchLinux with GCC 5.2, I am able to generate an internal
compiler error with this code:
class A {
public:
A() {}
static const A& a() {
static A _a = A();
return (_a);
}
virtual A& operator= (const A&) {
return *this;
}
};
int main() {
return 0;
}
Compile it with:
g++ -std=c++14 -fsanitize=undefined test.cpp
This will generate:
test.cpp: In static member function ‘static const A& A::a()’:
test.cpp:7:19: internal compiler error: in check_return_expr, at
cp/typeck.c:8682
return (_a);
>From gcc-bugs-return-503580-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 02:38:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503580-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88645 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 02:38:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88621 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 02:38:39 -0000
From: "daniel.santos at pobox dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68507] attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping xmm6-15 needlessly
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 02:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.santos at pobox dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68507-4-gZf02G1Win@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02507.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1021
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68507
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Santos <daniel.santos at pobox dot com> ---
According to § 3.2.1 "Registers and the Stack Frame" of the System V
Application Binary Interface for AMD64
Registers %rbp, %rbx and %r12 through %r15 “belong” to the calling function and
the called function is required to preserve their values. In other words, a
called function must preserve these registers’ values for its caller. Remaining
registers “belong” to the called function.5 If a calling function wants to
preserve such a register value across a function call, it must save the value
in its local stack frame.
And for microsoft's "x64" calling convention
(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9z1stfyw.aspx), the xmm registers are
considered non-volatile, so it would appear that this is the correct behaviour,
barring some extensive whole-program analysis that can guarantee that the xmm
registers are not destroyed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503581-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 02:42:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503581-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91377 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 02:42:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91342 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 02:42:02 -0000
From: "daniel.santos at pobox dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68507] attribute ms_abi (on Linux) bloats by pushing/popping xmm6-15 needlessly
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 02:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.santos at pobox dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68507-4-Bz8NFeEiBs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02508.txt.bz2
Content-length: 438
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68507
Daniel Santos <daniel.santos at pobox dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Santos <daniel.santos at pobox dot com> ---
closing
>From gcc-bugs-return-503582-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 03:10:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503582-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14782 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 03:09:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14596 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 03:09:55 -0000
From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.9/5/6 regression] Performance regression of 410.bwaves on x86.
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-52272-4-uY6Xfn2Tjb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52272-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52272-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02509.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #29 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think this is fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503583-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 03:10:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503583-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14919 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 03:10:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14672 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 03:09:57 -0000
From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/50955] [4.7 Regression] IVopts incorrectly rewrite the address of a global memory access into a local form.
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-50955-4-YnQnYRl8IW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02510.txt.bz2
Content-length: 493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955
Bug 50955 depends on bug 52272, which changed state.
Bug 52272 Summary: [4.9/5/6 regression] Performance regression of 410.bwaves on x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503584-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 03:10:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503584-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15121 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 03:10:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14730 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 03:09:58 -0000
From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/52868] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.6 is faster on Atom
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-52868-4-ILzDK1rLeu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02511.txt.bz2
Content-length: 493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52868
Bug 52868 depends on bug 52272, which changed state.
Bug 52272 Summary: [4.9/5/6 regression] Performance regression of 410.bwaves on x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503585-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 03:42:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503585-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128163 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 03:42:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128116 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 03:42:22 -0000
From: "lucdanton at free dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68509] New: [6 regression][C++1z] ICE: in check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lucdanton at free dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02512.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68509
Bug ID: 68509
Summary: [6 regression][C++1z] ICE: in check_return_expr, at
cp/typeck.c:8635
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lucdanton at free dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
Testcase compiles fine in C++11 and C++14 modes, ICE is in C++1z mode only.
$ g++-trunk --version
g++-trunk (GCC) 6.0.0 20151124 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
$ cat main.cpp
constexpr auto foo(int i)
{
if(i == 0) {
return 0;
} else {
return 'a';
}
}
int main()
{
using X = decltype( foo(0) );
return X {};
}
$ g++-trunk -std=c++1z main.cpp
main.cpp: In function 'constexpr auto foo(int)':
main.cpp:6:16: internal compiler error: in check_return_expr, at
cp/typeck.c:8635
return 'a';
^~~
0x66f5b3 check_return_expr(tree_node*, bool*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c:8635
0x68fa5e finish_return_stmt(tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c:867
0x6584e8 cp_parser_jump_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11414
0x6584e8 cp_parser_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10035
0x658bac cp_parser_statement_seq_opt
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10426
0x658ce6 cp_parser_compound_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10380
0x65fb0c cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11520
0x658a01 cp_parser_selection_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10555
0x658a01 cp_parser_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10010
0x658bac cp_parser_statement_seq_opt
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10426
0x658ce6 cp_parser_compound_statement
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10380
0x658e3b cp_parser_function_body
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:20192
0x658e3b cp_parser_ctor_initializer_opt_and_function_body
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:20228
0x6599e8 cp_parser_function_definition_after_declarator
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:24836
0x65a93f cp_parser_function_definition_from_specifiers_and_declarator
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:24748
0x65a93f cp_parser_init_declarator
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:17972
0x65ac3d cp_parser_simple_declaration
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11980
0x65b0d3 cp_parser_block_declaration
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11854
0x662d35 cp_parser_declaration
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11751
0x661328 cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt
../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11630
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503586-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 05:12:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503586-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6921 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 05:12:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6836 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 05:12:08 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-OIKB4JXFMj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02513.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2174
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36815
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36815&action=edit
simple version in python
This implements the basics of the checker using the gcc python plugin.
A few notes on this:
There didn't seem to be a great way to insert __context__ into the IR.
I ended up making a const function with a special attribute. I used a function
to
get it into the IR, const so that it would be optimized away later, and
an attribute so we could recognize it.
The attribute syntax in the test case doesn't work with gcc. The attributes
on the function definitions can't appear at the end.
I didn't handle the version of __context__ or the attribute that takes
an explicit lock. For __context__ this can be done (varargs function maybe);
but for the attribute I am not so sure, because I don't think the
function parameters are in scope when the attribute is parsed. (Not sure,
maybe there's some way.)
The upstream sparse validation/context.c has a bug where _ca is declared
returning void (though this is fixed in the version attached here).
One further issue is that I chose to implement this relatively early in
the pipeline. I did it after gimplification and after the cfg is built
(these both make it simpler to implement); but before most optimizations
are done. This is the uninitialized warning situation again, I think,
where exactly when the pass is invoked will affect the results. It also
brings up the question of what exactly the semantics are; for example
whether code like this is valid:
if (cond)
lock();
blah;
if (cond)
unlock();
This plugin will warn about this code; but maybe it should not.
Python might be too slow for your taste, but it was easy to write :) and
I think the IR and syntax issues above are problems for any approach.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503587-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 06:43:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503587-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21219 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 06:43:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21156 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 06:43:53 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68381-4-cE36D7Qalh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02514.txt.bz2
Content-length: 863
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 06:43:20 2015
New Revision: 230786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Handle aborts in is_parallel_of_n_reg_sets (PR68381)
Some users of is_parallel_of_n_reg_sets disregard the clobbers in a
parallel after it has returned "yes, this is a parallel of N sets and
maybe some clobbers". But combine uses a clobber of const0_rtx to
indicate substitution failure, so this leads to disaster.
Fix this by checking for such special clobbers in is_parallel_of_n_reg_sets.
PR rtl-optimization/68381
* combine.c (is_parallel_of_n_reg_sets): Return false if the pattern
is poisoned.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/combine.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503588-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 06:44:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503588-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22154 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 06:44:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22114 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 06:44:28 -0000
From: "inferrna at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/67984] [GRAPHITE] internal compiler error: isl_ctx freed, but some objects still reference it
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: inferrna at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-67984-4-MhHjhpbKny@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02515.txt.bz2
Content-length: 517
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984
inferrna <inferrna at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #36523|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #3 from inferrna <inferrna at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 36816
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36816&action=edit
Same, without OpenCL
>From gcc-bugs-return-503589-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 06:46:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503589-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24045 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 06:46:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23926 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 06:46:25 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-OF9YsFWSBg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02516.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #2 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #1)
> Created attachment 36815 [details]
> simple version in python
>
> This implements the basics of the checker using the gcc python plugin.
Awesome!
> A few notes on this:
>
> There didn't seem to be a great way to insert __context__ into the IR.
> I ended up making a const function with a special attribute. I used a
> function to
> get it into the IR, const so that it would be optimized away later, and
> an attribute so we could recognize it.
That sounds completely sensible.
> The attribute syntax in the test case doesn't work with gcc. The attributes
> on the function definitions can't appear at the end.
Placing attributes at the end of the function definition works with Sparse, and
as far as I can tell with GCC as well. The Linux kernel uses trailing
attributes on functions (both prototypes and definitions) fairly frequently,
including with the context attribute.
> I didn't handle the version of __context__ or the attribute that takes
> an explicit lock. For __context__ this can be done (varargs function maybe);
> but for the attribute I am not so sure, because I don't think the
> function parameters are in scope when the attribute is parsed. (Not sure,
> maybe there's some way.)
As mentioned, Sparse doesn't currently pay attention to that argument either,
for much the same reason. As a result, users of that argument currently don't
always pass something sensible. I'd love to see a solution that makes it
possible to detect things like "foo_lock(&foo); foo_unlock(&foo2);", but the
first pass can just ignore those arguments (though it needs to parse and ignore
them for compatibility).
In general, it seems useful to have the ability to reference argument names in
attributes on a function. For instance, imagine using argument names rather
than indexes for the printf attribute or another attribute like it.
The context attribute, though, wants something more complex than that: the
ability to provide expressions based on those arguments, such as arg->lock.
That does seem like a tall order.
> The upstream sparse validation/context.c has a bug where _ca is declared
> returning void (though this is fixed in the version attached here).
>
> One further issue is that I chose to implement this relatively early in
> the pipeline. I did it after gimplification and after the cfg is built
> (these both make it simpler to implement); but before most optimizations
> are done. This is the uninitialized warning situation again, I think,
> where exactly when the pass is invoked will affect the results. It also
> brings up the question of what exactly the semantics are; for example
> whether code like this is valid:
>
> if (cond)
> lock();
> blah;
> if (cond)
> unlock();
>
> This plugin will warn about this code; but maybe it should not.
One of the reasons I wanted to see this in GCC, in addition to making it more
widely available, was to take advantage of GCC's better (or rather *existent*)
optimization and simplification passes. While I don't necessarily think
conditional locks like the above should work (it seems easy enough to rework
that code into something more obvious that doesn't require the compiler to know
if blah can affect cond), I *do* think a GCC-based plugin has the potential to
infer more information without as many annotations. For instance, consider a
function which calls a function annotated as __must_hold, but only if passed a
given flag. GCC could then know that the function only needs the lock *if*
passed that flag (or if it can't tell until runtime). (Going too far in that
direction leads to algebraic evaluators, but still...)
So I suspect it may make sense to run this after inlining, specialization,
dead-code elimination, and similar.
> Python might be too slow for your taste, but it was easy to write :) and
> I think the IR and syntax issues above are problems for any approach.
I don't mind the use of Python, though I wonder how easily such a script could
work by default. Given this script, how do you invoke GCC and run it? How
much stability does this interface provide? Could the Linux kernel ship such a
script and invoke it as part of the compile, given some dependency checks (and
likely a Kconfig option if it increases build time significantly)?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503590-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 06:58:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503590-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83478 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 06:58:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83425 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 06:58:13 -0000
From: "lucdanton at free dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68510] New: [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1827
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lucdanton at free dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68510-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02517.txt.bz2
Content-length: 914
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510
Bug ID: 68510
Summary: [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at
gimplify.c:1827
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lucdanton at free dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36817
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36817&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Using g++-trunk (GCC) 6.0.0 20151124 (experimental). The testcase was
mechanically reduced. An older snapshot used to be able to compile the original
unreduced program, according to the reflog:
commit c66cf0b787e892170f4981e8473aab601610a630
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@229691
138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
>From gcc-bugs-return-503591-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 07:00:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503591-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91776 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 07:00:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91662 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 07:00:16 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc++/68511] New: FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line 51,59)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: objc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02518.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1146
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68511
Bug ID: 68511
Summary: FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm
-fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line 51,59)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
obj-c++.log:
...
src/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm: In function
'-[MySubClass testMe]':
src/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm:48:13: error: no 'count'
getter found
compiler exited with status 1
PASS: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line
48)
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line
51)
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line
56)
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line
59)
PASS: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for excess
errors)
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503592-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 07:02:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503592-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94107 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 07:02:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94074 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 07:02:15 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc++/68511] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line 51,59)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: objc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68511-4-bF7ynqIAQ6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02519.txt.bz2
Content-length: 507
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68511
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
confirmed: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-11/msg02507.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-503593-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 07:03:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503593-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95202 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 07:03:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95150 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 07:03:10 -0000
From: "y.gribov at samsung dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: y.gribov at samsung dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-thYfFHtJu0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02520.txt.bz2
Content-length: 516
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |polacek at redhat dot com,
| |y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> ---
Correction - this is not ASan but UBSan. Summoning Marek.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503594-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 07:35:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503594-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86667 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 07:35:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86597 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 07:35:29 -0000
From: "odell.wood at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68512] New: Non-deterministic behavior from gcc
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: odell.wood at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02521.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3368
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68512
Bug ID: 68512
Summary: Non-deterministic behavior from gcc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: odell.wood at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I've been struggling with bugs in gcc that cause non-reproducible errors for a
while now, pretty much every time I try to build a project from source. The
latest error is coming up when I try to build cutorch.
Command which causes non-reproducible bug:
/usr/local/cuda-7.0/bin/nvcc
/home/thomas/documents/code/torch/extra/cutorch/lib/THC/THCTensorMathPointwise.cu
-c -o
/home/thomas/documents/code/torch/extra/cutorch/build/lib/THC/CMakeFiles/THC.dir//./THC_generated_THCTensorMathPointwise.cu.o
-ccbin /usr/bin/cc -m64 -DTHC_EXPORTS -Xcompiler
,\"-fPIC\",\"-O3\",\"-DNDEBUG\" -gencode arch=compute_52,code=sm_52 -gencode
arch=compute_50,code=sm_50 -DNVCC -I/usr/local/cuda-7.0/include
-I/home/thomas/documents/code/torch/install/include
-I/home/thomas/documents/code/torch/install/include/TH
-I/usr/local/cuda-7.0/include
-I/home/thomas/documents/code/torch/extra/cutorch/lib/THC/CUDA_SDK_ROOT_DIR-NOTFOUND/common/inc
-I/home/thomas/documents/code/torch/extra/cutorch/build/lib/THC
In file included from
tmpxft_00003a7f_00000000-7_THCTensorMathPointwise.compute_52.cudafe1.stub.c:1:0:
/tmp/tmpxft_00003a7f_00000000-7_THCTensorMathPointwise.compute_52.cudafe1.stub.c:
In function ‘void
__sti____cudaRegisterAll_69_tmpxft_00003a7f_00000000_10_THCTensorMathPointwise_compute_50_cpp1_ii_f2e6419b()’:
/tmp/tmpxft_00003a7f_00000000-7_THCTensorMathPointwise.compute_52.cudafe1.stub.c:4257:361:
internal compiler error: in schedule_block, at haifa-sched.c:6296
static void
__sti____cudaRegisterAll_69_tmpxft_00003a7f_00000000_10_THCTensorMathPointwise_compute_50_cpp1_ii_f2e6419b(void){__cudaRegisterBinary(__nv_cudaEntityRegisterCallback);}
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.8/README.Bugs> for instructions.
The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
If I try it again, it works fine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503595-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 07:52:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503595-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58626 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 07:52:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57101 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 07:52:50 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68512] Non-deterministic behavior from gcc
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component version bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-68512-4-43qb9N3VB2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02522.txt.bz2
Content-length: 576
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68512
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |middle-end
Version|unknown |4.8.0
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Have you checked to make sure the memory you is using is fine? How about your
CPU overheating?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503596-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 07:54:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503596-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68133 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 07:54:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68109 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 07:54:30 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc++/68511] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/dotsyntax-11.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for errors, line 51,56,59)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: objc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68511-4-iicCgjFev7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02523.txt.bz2
Content-length: 615
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68511
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
regression between https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-11/msg00711.html:
between r230767 and r230734.
r230755 looks like it could be related:
...
gcc/c-family
PR c++/68001
* c-gimplify.c (c_gimplify_expr): Stop the process if see an error.
* cilk.c (recognize_spawn): Determine location in a more precise
way.
gcc/cp
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_expr): Stop the process if see an error.
gcc/testsuite
* g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/pr68001.cc: New test.
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503597-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 08:57:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503597-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87515 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 08:57:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87466 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 08:57:46 -0000
From: "vaalfreja at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68456] UINT32_TYPE has different type for i586-elf and for i586-unknown-linux
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vaalfreja at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68456-4-BisMImLevH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68456-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68456-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02524.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Yulia Koval <vaalfreja at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |---
Summary|UINT32_TYPE is long |UINT32_TYPE has different
|unsigned for 32bit targets |type for i586-elf and for
| |i586-unknown-linux
--- Comment #6 from Yulia Koval <vaalfreja at gmail dot com> ---
> The types used in GCC are intended to be consistent with what the libc's
> own headers do (lots of problems will arise if they aren't). Newlib's
> headers, as of when this support was added to GCC, used long in that case,
> a use introduced by <https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2005/msg00824.html>,
> apparently because it was convenient for the newlib implementation at that
> time.
And why newlib-stdint header is used in this case? I haven't used any
newlib-related options in configure. These targets still have different types
for UINT32_TYPE.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503598-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:02:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503598-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102109 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:02:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102037 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:02:37 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65980] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure building Linux kernel
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-65980-4-gLurjl6JpO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65980-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65980-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02525.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1558
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36818
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36818&action=edit
unreduced testcase
The reduced testcase doesn't reproduce the issue anymore.
I've attached a new unreduced testcase.
markus@x4 linux % gcc --save-temps -fcompare-debug -O3 -c api.i
gcc: error: api.i: -fcompare-debug failure
markus@x4 linux % diff -u api.gkd api.gk.gkd
--- api.gkd 2015-11-24 10:00:40.063801541 +0100
+++ api.gk.gkd 2015-11-24 10:00:40.460459460 +0100
@@ -941,7 +941,7 @@
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 672 (nil)))
-> 106)
-(code_label # 0 0 6 104 "" [2 uses])
+(code_label # 0 0 6 105 "" [2 uses])
(note # 0 0 [bb 6] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(note # 0 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(note # 0 0 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@
(pc))) crypto/api.c:181# {*jcc_1}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CCGOC 17 flags)
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 3900 (nil)))
- -> 41)
+ -> 48)
(note # 0 0 [bb 10] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn:TI # 0 0 10 (set (reg/v/f:DI 41 r12 [orig:99 alg ] [99])
(mem/f:DI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 6 bp [orig:144 <retval> ] [144])
@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@
(pc))) crypto/api.c:185# {*jcc_1}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 3900 (nil)))
- -> 68)
+ -> 74)
(code_label # 0 0 13 49 "" [1 uses])
(note # 0 0 [bb 13] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn:TI # 0 0 13 (parallel [
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503599-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:04:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503599-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104941 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:04:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104853 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:04:43 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-x2PwU28ern@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02526.txt.bz2
Content-length: 632
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.4
Summary|[6 Regression] wrong code |[4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong
|at -O2 and -O3 on |code at -O2 and -O3 on
|x86_64-linux-gnu |x86_64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
One of the dups also fails on the 4.9 and 5 branches.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503600-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:07:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503600-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4505 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:07:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4321 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:07:32 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68502] [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68502-4-gYsxMBKRXo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02527.txt.bz2
Content-length: 622
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503601-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:08:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503601-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6705 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:08:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6531 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:08:51 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68509] [6 regression][C++1z] ICE: in check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68509-4-RKwSScDAq7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02528.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68509
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503602-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:14:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503602-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44614 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:14:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44541 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:14:01 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68506] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-LGLslBkVYF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02529.txt.bz2
Content-length: 537
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503603-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:18:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503603-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62398 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:18:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62307 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 09:18:13 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68221-4-nR05dq9lL1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02530.txt.bz2
Content-length: 502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:17:40 2015
New Revision: 230793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/68221
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (copy_reference_ops_from_ref): Properly
use mem_ref_offset.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503604-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:26:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503604-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97981 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:26:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97853 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:26:41 -0000
From: "jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] New: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02531.txt.bz2
Content-length: 591
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Bug ID: 68513
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36819
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36819&action=edit
testcase
Test case attached. Simply compile without any optimizations.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503605-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:31:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503605-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103724 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:31:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103632 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:31:17 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_known_to_work keywords cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed short_desc target_milestone cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4-J8unNdKP6q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02532.txt.bz2
Content-length: 926
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work| |4.9.3
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|ICE in gimplify_expr, at |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
|gimplify.c:8832 |gimplify_expr, at
| |gimplify.c:8832
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
Known to fail| |5.1.0, 5.2.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503607-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:32:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503607-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107059 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106886 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:30 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-LwWyD80jSk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02534.txt.bz2
Content-length: 869
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:31:57 2015
New Revision: 230795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ree.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503609-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:32:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503609-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107350 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106972 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:32 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68328] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68328-4-j6htisvbzB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02536.txt.bz2
Content-length: 869
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:31:57 2015
New Revision: 230795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ree.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503606-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:32:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503606-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105499 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105453 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:08 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4-Jkv7BrmfN0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02533.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1091
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
|gimplify_expr, at |gimplify_expr, at
|gimplify.c:8832 |gimplify.c:8832,
| |c_maybe_const_expr in IL
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
#1 0x0000000000adeb18 in gimplify_expr (expr_p=0x7ffff6a05400,
pre_p=0x7fffffffd190, post_p=0x7fffffffb9e8, gimple_test_f=
0xa8b7a8 <is_gimple_val(tree_node*)>, fallback=1)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/gimplify.c:10620
10620 gcc_unreachable ();
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (*expr_p)
<<< Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr
someFuncX ((someFuncY ((void *) (somePtr + 4352)) - (someVar == 2 ? 218103808
: 33554432)) / 2097152 + 1) >>>
$1 = void
>From gcc-bugs-return-503608-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:32:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503608-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107257 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106959 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 09:32:31 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68185-4-3KWtohfvGc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02535.txt.bz2
Content-length: 868
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:31:57 2015
New Revision: 230795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ree.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503610-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:33:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503610-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112738 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:33:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 110691 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:33:05 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-OO1rj6ftld@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02537.txt.bz2
Content-length: 182
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk.
Will test the patch on 4.9 and GCC 5 and propose backports
>From gcc-bugs-return-503611-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:35:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503611-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124037 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:35:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123999 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:35:35 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4-YIbq1eCtyO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02538.txt.bz2
Content-length: 831
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat ice.i
int a;
unsigned b, c;
void fn1() { (short)(((0, 0) ? *(volatile *)4 * b : 0) & ~c | a & c); }
markus@x4 tmp % gcc -c ice.i
ice.i: In function ‘fn1’:
ice.i:3:1: warning: type defaults to ‘int’ in type name [-Wimplicit-int]
void fn1() { (short)(((0, 0) ? *(volatile *)4 * b : 0) & ~c | a & c); }
^
ice.i:3:47: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832
>From gcc-bugs-return-503612-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:45:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503612-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18169 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:45:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18119 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 09:45:55 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68337] [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in huge resource usage and binaries
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68337-4-BgrnHEkkWx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02539.txt.bz2
Content-length: 819
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Nov 24 09:45:20 2015
New Revision: 230796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR c/68337
* gimple-fold.c: Include ipa-chkp.h.
(gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op): Don't fold call if we
are going to instrument it and it may copy pointers.
gcc/testsuite/
PR c/68337
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-2.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/gimple-fold.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503613-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:48:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503613-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23369 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:48:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22824 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:48:43 -0000
From: "matthias at goldhoorn dot eu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68195] gcc//ld produces invalid ABI results (cxx11 problem?)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: matthias at goldhoorn dot eu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68195-4-29UoE5vHm5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68195-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68195-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02540.txt.bz2
Content-length: 310
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68195
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Goldhoorn <matthias at goldhoorn dot eu> ---
Tested gcc6 (daily bump 20151124 (638a694865e4ad7d35397526251f1401e01afb54)
from git, branch master) same problem the binary for testcase1 segfaults, the
other ones running fine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503614-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 09:55:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503614-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86313 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 09:55:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85910 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 09:55:02 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4-FjWnXnSeoK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02541.txt.bz2
Content-length: 580
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've seen some c_maybe_const_expr so likely mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503615-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:36:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503615-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58945 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:36:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58879 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 10:36:19 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c (internal compiler error)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68403-4-GHB47mEH4b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68403-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68403-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02542.txt.bz2
Content-length: 999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems to have been fixed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-11/msg00601.html :
...
Regressions on trunk at revision 230597 vs revision 230463
...
New passes:
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 compilation failed to produce
executable
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503616-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:37:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503616-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60360 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:37:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60274 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 10:37:11 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68506] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-j5ndXESwKW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02543.txt.bz2
Content-length: 575
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r230014 - [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67749: Do not emit
separate SET insn in IF-ELSE case.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503617-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:42:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503617-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20704 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:42:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14809 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 10:42:13 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4-ZbOXMHzlXW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02544.txt.bz2
Content-length: 536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r218816:
commit 277f7164f168a399312b5871323c7de0990ef85b
Author: mpolacek <mpolacek@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Wed Dec 17 11:48:33 2014 +0000
PR middle-end/63568
* match.pd: Add (x & ~m) | (y & m) -> ((x ^ y) & m) ^ x pattern.
* gcc.dg/pr63568.c: New test.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@218816
138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
>From gcc-bugs-return-503618-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:46:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503618-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51868 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:46:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51814 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 10:46:25 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-feegE4N5qr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02545.txt.bz2
Content-length: 934
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 24 10:45:52 2015
New Revision: 230797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68483
* tree-vect-generic.c (lower_vec_perm): If VEC_PERM_EXPR
is valid vec_shr pattern, don't lower it even if can_vec_perm_p
returns false.
* optabs.c (shift_amt_for_vec_perm_mask): Return NULL_RTX
whenever first is nelt or above. Don't mask expected with
2 * nelt - 1.
* gcc.target/i386/pr68483-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/pr68483-2.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68483-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68483-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/optabs.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503619-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:47:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503619-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52992 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:47:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52956 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 10:47:01 -0000
From: "rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68514] New: [6 Regression] ICE in tr1/5_numerical_facilities libstdc++ test cases
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68514-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02546.txt.bz2
Content-length: 10495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514
Bug ID: 68514
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tr1/5_numerical_facilities
libstdc++ test cases
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de
Target Milestone: ---
I get a lot of new failures for the tr1/5_numerical_facilities test cases of
the libstdc++ testsuite compared to a gcc trunk version dated 3 weeks back, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-11/msg00244.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-11/msg02553.html
All like the following:
FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/random/minstd_rand.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:135:5:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
libbacktrace could not find executable to open
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
UNRESOLVED: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/random/minstd_rand.cc compilation failed
to produce executable
extra_tool_flags are:
-include bits/stdc++.h
Executing on host:
/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc
-B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib
-L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/mingw/lib
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/mingw/include
-B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/
-B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-include
-B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -O2
-DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-w64-mingw32
-I/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/random/minstd_rand0.cc
-include bits/stdc++.h -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never ./libtestc++.a -Wl,--gc-sections -liconv
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/.libs
-lm -o ./minstd_rand0.exe (timeout = 600)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc
-B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib
-L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/mingw/lib
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/mingw/include
-B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/
-B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include
-isystem
/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-include
-B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -O2
-DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-w64-mingw32
-I/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/random/minstd_rand0.cc
-include bits/stdc++.h -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never
./libtestc++.a -Wl,--gc-sections -liconv
-L/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/.libs
-lm -o ./minstd_rand0.exe
In file included from
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/cmath:1023:0,
from
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/random:46,
from
D:/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/random/minstd_rand0.cc:23:
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:
In instantiation of '_Tp std::tr1::__detail::__beta_lgamma(_Tp, _Tp) [with _Tp
= long double]':
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:189:29:
required from '_Tp std::tr1::__detail::__beta(_Tp, _Tp) [with _Tp = long
double]'
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/cmath:1089:50:
required from here
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:135:5:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
libbacktrace could not find executable to open
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
In file included from
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/cmath:1023:0,
from
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/random:46,
from
D:/opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-6.0.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/random/minstd_rand0.cc:23:
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:
In instantiation of '_Tp std::tr1::__detail::__beta_lgamma(_Tp, _Tp) [with _Tp
= long double]':
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:189:29:
required from '_Tp std::tr1::__detail::__beta(_Tp, _Tp) [with _Tp = long
double]'
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/cmath:1089:50:
required from here
D:/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/gcc-6.0.0/gcc-6.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/beta_function.tcc:135:5:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
libbacktrace could not find executable to open
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Used trunk revision:
Compiler version: 6.0.0 20151123 (experimental) [trunk revision 230759] (GCC)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32
configure flags:
--prefix=/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0
--with-gnu-as
--with-as=/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/bin/as
--with-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0/bin/ld
--build=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --enable-threads=posix
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,lto,objc,obj-c++
--with-gmp-include=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/include
--with-gmp-lib=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/lib64
--with-mpfr-include=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/include
--with-mpfr-lib=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/lib64
--with-mpc-include=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/include
--with-mpc-lib=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/lib64
--with-isl-include=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/include
--with-isl-lib=/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.1q8vvgkTb5/install/lib64
--with-local-prefix=/opt/devel/tec/devel/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-6.0.0
--enable-libgomp --enable-fully-dynamic-string --disable-multilib
--enable-checking=release --disable-werror --with-sysroot=/x86_64-w64-trunk
Last working version I have:
Compiler version: 6.0.0 20151102 (experimental) [trunk revision 229656] (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503620-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:50:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503620-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59087 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:50:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59039 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 10:50:12 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-EPjy8nnZCM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02547.txt.bz2
Content-length: 727
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r219695 aka SANITIZE_VPTR addition.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503621-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 10:56:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503621-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66814 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 10:56:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66775 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 10:56:10 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68509] [6 regression][C++1z] ICE: in check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68509-4-zNKFNLfCyb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02548.txt.bz2
Content-length: 780
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68509
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r229629:
commit 433fc17c1863c9dbdf232263785d144f50a480ff
Author: jason <jason@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Sat Oct 31 16:20:05 2015 +0000
Implement multiple 'auto' feature from Concepts TS.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503622-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:00:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503622-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75518 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:00:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75287 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:00:23 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68506] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status component assigned_to short_desc cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-3cnSwjguuL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02549.txt.bz2
Content-length: 719
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|wrong code at -O3 on |[6 Regression] wrong code
|x86_64-linux-gnu |at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Known to fail| |6.0
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed as well and mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503623-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:02:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503623-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81012 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:02:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80929 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:02:26 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68510] [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1827
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68510-4-nVzahiE0OX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68510-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68510-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02550.txt.bz2
Content-length: 659
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r230365: Merge C++ delayed folding branch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503624-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:04:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503624-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83426 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:04:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83361 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 11:04:24 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68375] [6 Regression] ICE in get_loop_body_in_bfs_order when dumping cfg with -fdump-tree-optimized-graph
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68375-4-KFWhyFYaUY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68375-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68375-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02551.txt.bz2
Content-length: 667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68375
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 11:03:51 2015
New Revision: 230798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[cfgloop] PR middle-end/68375: Restructure get_loop_body_in_bfs_order to handle
loops with only a header
PR middle-end/68375
* cfgloop.c (get_loop_body_in_bfs_order): Restructure loop to avoid
bogus assertion.
* gcc.dg/pr68375.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68375.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cfgloop.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503625-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:05:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503625-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93892 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:05:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93816 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:05:03 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68375] [6 Regression] ICE in get_loop_body_in_bfs_order when dumping cfg with -fdump-tree-optimized-graph
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68375-4-GqDZO5QJ1W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68375-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68375-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02552.txt.bz2
Content-length: 406
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68375
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503626-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:06:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503626-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 110504 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:06:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 110246 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:06:32 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68357] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/other/darwin-cfstring1.C -std=* (internal compiler error) on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|4)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68357-4-VBBBunJj6U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68357-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68357-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02553.txt.bz2
Content-length: 277
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68357
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
This PR seems to have been fixed(?) between revisions r230734 (FAIL) and
r230777 (PASS). Without objection in the coming days I'll close it as FIXED.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503628-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:11:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503628-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128372 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:11:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128320 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:11:55 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc component bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-pSEzYPatp1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02555.txt.bz2
Content-length: 593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c |target
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can't reproduce with "-g -O2" on x86_64-linux (tried 4.9/5/trunk). Maybe
some target issue?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503627-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:11:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503627-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127192 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:11:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127110 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 11:11:17 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-9bdLqC6z1g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02554.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1030
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 24 11:10:45 2015
New Revision: 230799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230799&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68483
* tree-vect-generic.c (lower_vec_perm): If VEC_PERM_EXPR
is valid vec_shr pattern, don't lower it even if can_vec_perm_p
returns false.
* optabs.c (shift_amt_for_vec_perm_mask): Return NULL_RTX
whenever first is nelt or above. Don't mask expected with
2 * nelt - 1.
* gcc.target/i386/pr68483-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/pr68483-2.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68483-1.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68483-2.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/optabs.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503630-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:16:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503630-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8386 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:16:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8121 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:16:25 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-53947-4-US85jNo5oH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53947-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53947-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02557.txt.bz2
Content-length: 483
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 68483, which changed state.
Bug 68483 Summary: [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503629-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:16:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503629-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8190 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:16:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8090 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:16:24 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68483] [5/6 Regression] gcc 5.2: suboptimal code compared to 4.9
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68483-4-7ZoJ78CvEk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02556.txt.bz2
Content-length: 432
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68483
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 5.3+.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503631-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:18:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503631-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15477 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:18:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15343 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:18:02 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68329] [4.8 4.9]gcc using array index to accelerate loop running , why turn off at gcc 5.X
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc component
Message-ID: <bug-68329-4-faTZEniPRz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68329-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68329-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02558.txt.bz2
Content-length: 527
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68329
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c |tree-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Not sure if there's anything wrong but doesn't look a C FE-related stuff.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503632-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:23:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503632-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54955 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:23:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54665 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:23:27 -0000
From: "naupacte at sfr dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68515] New: std::result_of<F(X)> doesn't work when F is abstract (with pure virtual functions)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: naupacte at sfr dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02559.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2154
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68515
Bug ID: 68515
Summary: std::result_of<F(X)> doesn't work when F is abstract
(with pure virtual functions)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: naupacte at sfr dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
I had to replace 'typename std::result_of<F(X)>::type' by
'decltype(std::declval<F>()(X()))'
All is in the title. Here is an example:
template <class T, class F, class R=typename result_of<F(T)>::type> vector<R>
make_result(const vector<T>& x, const F& f)
{
auto n = x.size();
vector<R> y(n);
for (uint i=0; i<n; i++) y[i] = f(x[i]);
return y;
}
template <class R, class T> struct virtual_func
{
R operator()(T x) const { return _get(x);}
virtual R _get(T) const = 0;
}
template <class R, class T> struct virtual_sqrt : virtual_func<R,T>
{
virtual R _get(T x) const { return std::sqrt(x);}
}
std::vector<double> sqrt(const std::vector<double>& v)
{
return make_result(v,virtual_sqrt{});
}
/opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-5 --version
gcc-mp-5 (MacPorts gcc5 5.2.0_0) 5.2.0
/opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-5 -x c++ -m64 -std=gnu++14 -c foo.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>
error: no matching function for call to 'make_result(const vector<double>&,
const virtual_func<double,double>&)'
note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
error: invalid abstract return type 'virtual_func<double>'
template <class T, class F, class R=Result_of<F(T)>> vector<R>
make_result(const vector<T>& x, const F& f) { auto n = x.size(); vector<R>
y(n); for (uint i=0; i<n; i++) y[i] = f(x[i]); return y;}
^
note: because the following virtual functions are pure within
'virtual_func<double>':
template <class R, class T> struct virtual_func
^
note: R virtual_func<R,T>::_get(T) const [with R = double; T = double]
virtual R _get(T) const = 0;
NB: here are the implementation details:
>From gcc-bugs-return-503633-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:28:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503633-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72036 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:28:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71340 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:28:00 -0000
From: "nickc at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/54882] build fails for rl78-elf building libstdc++
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nickc at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-54882-4-QkzXYIQBSa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02560.txt.bz2
Content-length: 459
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54882
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
I just tried building the toolchain with r230800 and it worked without any
problems...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:31:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75420 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:31:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75307 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:31:01 -0000
From: "jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67550] [5/6 regression] Initialization of local struct array with elements of global array yields zeros instead of initializer values
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67550-4-zCAYXxp0nF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02561.txt.bz2
Content-length: 912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
--- Comment #6 from Jason Wyatt <jwyatt at feralinteractive dot com> ---
Adding a TREE_READONLY (to match TREE_READONLY being unset in
split_nonconstant_init) check seems to fix the generated gimple. This is total
guesswork though - I have no idea what side effects this change might have.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c
index ac11224..ee0405d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
@@ -2038,7 +2038,8 @@ constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool strict_p, bool
return_aggregate_cst_ok_p)
|| (strict_p
? decl_constant_var_p (decl)
: (VAR_P (decl)
- && CP_TYPE_CONST_NON_VOLATILE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)))))
+ && CP_TYPE_CONST_NON_VOLATILE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl))
+ && TREE_READONLY (decl))))
{
tree init;
/* If DECL is a static data member in a template
>From gcc-bugs-return-503635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:48:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103035 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:48:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102976 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:48:45 -0000
From: "jay.foad at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jay.foad at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68473-4-tJhqd4WYEn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02562.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2833
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jay.foad at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail dot com> ---
FYI here's another test case that seems to trigger the same bug. Your candidate
patch fixes it.
$ cat x.c
#define P(b) b&&4
int a[]=0;
int f() { X||P(d); }
$ ~/gcc/build/gcc/cc1 -quiet -Wall x.c
[...]
x.c:3:1: internal compiler error: in contains_point, at
diagnostic-show-locus.c:335
int f() { X||P(d); }
^~~
0x1268fc9 contains_point
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic-show-locus.c:335
0x1268fc9 get_state_at_point
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic-show-locus.c:612
0x12696e2 print_source_line
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic-show-locus.c:533
0x12696e2 diagnostic_show_locus(diagnostic_context*, diagnostic_info const*)
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic-show-locus.c:710
0x69b210 c_diagnostic_finalizer
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:167
0x1267220 diagnostic_report_diagnostic(diagnostic_context*, diagnostic_info*)
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:800
0x1267b07 warning_at(unsigned int, int, char const*, ...)
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1029
0x607e58 parser_build_binary_op(unsigned int, tree_code, c_expr, c_expr)
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-typeck.c:3514
0x61855a c_parser_binary_expression
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:6539
0x618a18 c_parser_conditional_expression
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:6182
0x619100 c_parser_expr_no_commas
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:6099
0x6198d2 c_parser_expression
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:8230
0x61a3a9 c_parser_expression_conv
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:8263
0x633431 c_parser_statement_after_labels
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:5172
0x635065 c_parser_compound_statement_nostart
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:4757
0x6358ae c_parser_compound_statement
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:4594
0x6314e3 c_parser_declaration_or_fndef
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:2015
0x63d31d c_parser_external_declaration
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:1459
0x63dbe9 c_parser_translation_unit
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:1346
0x63dbe9 c_parse_file()
/home/jay/svn/gcc/trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c:17622
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503636-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:57:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503636-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90091 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 11:57:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90052 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 11:56:57 -0000
From: "wdv4758h+gcc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68516] New: ICE: OpenMP with simd collapse
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wdv4758h+gcc at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68516-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02563.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3250
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68516
Bug ID: 68516
Summary: ICE: OpenMP with simd collapse
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wdv4758h+gcc at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /build/gcc-multilib/src/gcc-5.2.0/configure --prefix=/usr
--libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=https://bugs.archlinux.org/
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-libmpx --with-system-zlib --with-isl
--enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-clocale=gnu
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libssp --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-lto --enable-plugin
--enable-install-libiberty --with-linker-hash-style=gnu
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-multilib --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC)
========================================
$ cat test1.c
int a[100];
int main()
{
#pragma omp simd collapse(2)
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
for (int k = a[i]; k < 0; k++) {
a[i] = a[i] - 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
========================================
$ gcc -O3 -fopenmp test1.c
test1.c: In function ‘main’:
test1.c:7:23: warning: ‘i’ is used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
for (int k = a[i]; k < 0; k++) {
^
test1.c:3:5: internal compiler error: in expand_one_var, at cfgexpand.c:1339
int main()
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <https://bugs.archlinux.org/> for instructions.
========================================
$ cat test2.c
int a[100];
int main()
{
#pragma omp for simd collapse(2)
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
for (int k = a[i]; k < 0; k++) {
a[i] = a[i] - 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
========================================
$ gcc -O3 -fopenmp test2.c
test2.c: In function ‘main’:
test2.c:7:23: internal compiler error: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at
gimplify.c:1801
for (int k = a[i]; k < 0; k++) {
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <https://bugs.archlinux.org/> for instructions.
========================================
>From gcc-bugs-return-503637-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:01:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503637-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98906 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:01:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98875 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:01:30 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68517] New: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02564.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1492
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
Bug ID: 68517
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
The below testcases ICEs on arm and x86 at -O3:
typedef struct
{
} st1;
typedef struct
{
volatile int c;
} __attribute__ ((aligned (4))) st2;
struct s4
{
st1 f1;
st2 f2;
st1 f3;
};
void
foo (struct s3 *arg, struct s4 *arg1)
{
arg1->f1 = (st1)
{
};
arg1->f3 = (st1)
{
};
}
internal compiler error: Floating point exception
foo (struct s3 *arg, struct s4 *arg1)
^~~
0xae59df crash_signal
gcc/toplev.c:334
0x1230091 vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses(vec_info*)
gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
0xd3bca0 vect_slp_analyze_bb_1
gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2435
0xd3bca0 vect_slp_bb(basic_block_def*)
gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2608
0xd3e2b5 execute
gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:753
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
I haven't yet bisected to the revision
>From gcc-bugs-return-503638-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:01:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503638-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99746 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:01:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99706 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:01:47 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68517-4-Zbm8etpyBl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02565.txt.bz2
Content-length: 277
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503639-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:18:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503639-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 856 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:18:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 809 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 12:18:54 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68497] ICE: in output_387_binary_op, at config/i386/i386.c:17689 with -fno-checking
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68497-4-dhLsbl4kGy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02566.txt.bz2
Content-length: 677
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68497
--- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: miyuki
Date: Tue Nov 24 12:18:21 2015
New Revision: 230803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR68497 (ICE with -fno-checking)
gcc/
PR target/68497
* config/i386/i386.c (output_387_binary_op): Fix assertion for
-fno-checking case.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/68497
* gcc.target/i386/pr68497.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr68497.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503641-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:21:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503641-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6650 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:21:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6598 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:21:49 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68506] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-nVMDE466LS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02568.txt.bz2
Content-length: 479
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm testing a fix, but there's a slight issue with the testcase.
__assert_fail () doesn't exist for non-glibc libraries i.e. newlib so the
testcase fails to link there.
I tried replacing the __assert_fail with __builtin_abort but the bug doesn't
trigger then. Any ideas on how to make this portable?
If not, do we have any dejagnu directives that check for a glibc target?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503640-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:21:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503640-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5805 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:21:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5761 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:21:27 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68497] ICE: in output_387_binary_op, at config/i386/i386.c:17689 with -fno-checking
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68497-4-GrzT4xL5GM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02567.txt.bz2
Content-length: 439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68497
Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 6.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503642-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:22:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503642-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8311 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:22:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7896 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:22:49 -0000
From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-QkBznqFne1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02569.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1462
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #25 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #24)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> > For what its worth:
> >
> > $ gfc pr51119.f90 -lblas -fno-external-blas -Ofast -march=native
> > $ ./a.out
> > Time, MATMUL: 21.2483196 21.254449646000001 1.5055670945599979
> >
> > Time, dgemm: 33.2441711 33.243087289000002 .96260614189671445
> >
>
> Running a sample matrix multiply program on this same platform using the
> default OpenCL (Mesa on Fedora 22) the machine is achieving:
>
> 64 x 64 2.76 Gflops
> 1000 x 1000 14.10
> 2000 x 2000 24.4
But, that is not particularly impressive, is it? I don't know about current low
end graphics adapters, but at least the high end GPU cards (Tesla) are capable
of several Tflops. Of course, there is a non-trivial threshold size to amortize
the data movement to/from the GPU.
With the test program from #12, with OpenBLAS (which BTW should be available in
Fedora 22 as well) I get 337 Gflops/s, or 25 Gflops/s if I restrict it to a
single core with the OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 environment variable. This on a machine
with 20 2.8 GHz Ivy bridge cores.
I'm not per se against using GPU's, but I think there's a lot of low hanging
fruit to be had just by making it easier for users to use a high performance
BLAS implementation.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503643-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:29:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503643-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126679 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:29:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126562 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:29:46 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68506] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-RU401lMyil@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02570.txt.bz2
Content-length: 210
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Replacing __assert_fail () with abort () and compiling with -fno-builtin-abort
works, so I'll do that
>From gcc-bugs-return-503644-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:30:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503644-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128807 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:30:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128562 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:30:42 -0000
From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-jpOuCODO8a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02571.txt.bz2
Content-length: 638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #26 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15)
> Another issue: What should we do if the user supplies an external
> subroutine DGEMM which does something unrelated?
>
> I suppose we should then make DGEMM (and SGEMM) an intrinsic subroutine.
Indeed, this is a potential problem.
Another related problem is that, apparently, framework Accelerate on OSX uses
the f2c ABI. This at least can be worked around by instead using the cblas API
(and hence the C ABI), which most BLAS implementations provide anyway.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503645-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:38:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503645-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66117 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:38:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66032 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:38:04 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68502] [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68502-4-q5VdiusPsq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02572.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3348
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0804a482 in train_match (spot=0) at scanner.c:407
407 f1_layer[ti].W = f1_layer[ti].I[cp] + a*(f1_layer[ti].U);
(gdb) l
402
403 /* Compute F1 layer - W values */
404 tnorm = 0;
405 for (ti=0;ti<numf1s;ti++)
406 {
407 f1_layer[ti].W = f1_layer[ti].I[cp] + a*(f1_layer[ti].U);
408 tnorm += f1_layer[ti].W * f1_layer[ti].W;
409 }
410 tnorm = sqrt((double)tnorm);
411 /* Compute F1 layer - X values */
(gdb) disassemble
...
0x0804a478 <+568>: fldl 0x1c(%eax)
0x0804a47b <+571>: mov (%eax),%ecx
0x0804a47d <+573>: add $0x3c,%eax
0x0804a480 <+576>: fmul %st(2),%st
=> 0x0804a482 <+578>: faddl (%ecx,%esi,1)
0x0804a485 <+581>: fstl -0x38(%eax)
0x0804a488 <+584>: fmul %st(0),%st
0x0804a48a <+586>: faddp %st,%st(1)
0x0804a48c <+588>: cmp %eax,%ebx
0x0804a48e <+590>: jne 0x804a478 <train_match+568>
even without -mfpmath=sse here. ecx and esi are 0. This is the load
f1_layer[ti].I[cp] where f1_layer[ti].I is NULL (%ecx) and cp is 0 (%esi).
We vectorize the loop in reset_nodes()
for (i=0;i<numf1s;i++)
{
f1_layer[i].W = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].X = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].V = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].U = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].P = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].Q = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].R = 0.0;
}
which does not clear .I but the vectorized variant does:
0x0804a28a <+74>: vxorpd %xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0
0x0804a28e <+78>: add $0x1,%esi
0x0804a291 <+81>: vmovupd %ymm0,(%edx)
0x0804a295 <+85>: add $0xe0,%edx
0x0804a29b <+91>: vmovupd %ymm0,-0xc0(%edx)
0x0804a2a3 <+99>: vmovupd %ymm0,-0xa0(%edx)
0x0804a2ab <+107>: vmovupd %ymm0,-0x80(%edx)
0x0804a2b0 <+112>: vmovupd %ymm0,-0x60(%edx)
0x0804a2b5 <+117>: vmovupd %ymm0,-0x40(%edx)
0x0804a2ba <+122>: vmovupd %ymm0,-0x20(%edx)
0x0804a2bf <+127>: cmp %ebx,%esi
0x0804a2c1 <+129>: jb 0x804a28e <train_match+78>
testcase:
typedef struct {
double *I;
double W;
double X;
double V;
double U;
double P;
double Q;
double R;
} f1_neuron;
f1_neuron *f1_layer;
int numf1s = 1000;
void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
reset_nodes()
{ int i;
for (i=0;i<numf1s;i++)
{
f1_layer[i].W = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].X = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].V = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].U = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].P = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].Q = 0.0;
f1_layer[i].R = 0.0;
}
}
int main ()
{
int i;
f1_layer = (f1_neuron *)malloc (numf1s * sizeof (f1_neuron));
for (i = 0; i < numf1s; i++)
f1_layer[i].I = (double *)-1;
reset_nodes ();
for (i = 0; i < numf1s; i++)
if (f1_layer[i].I != (double *)-1)
abort ();
return 0;
}
The AVX2 dependence is just a cost model issue, -fno-vect-cost-model makes it
fail with SSE2 (but only -m32 still).
Ah, it depends on a GAP that is not a multiple of the vector element size!
32bit pointer gap but 64bit vector element. Which can also only happen
because double is aligned to 32bits only.
Interesting case ;)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503646-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:54:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503646-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22286 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:54:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22254 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:54:43 -0000
From: "odell.wood at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68512] Non-deterministic behavior from gcc
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: odell.wood at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68512-4-L9lvw9ox9E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02573.txt.bz2
Content-length: 439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68512
Thomas Wood <odell.wood at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Wood <odell.wood at gmail dot com> ---
That was it. Thanks!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503647-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 12:55:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503647-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23748 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 12:55:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23695 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 12:55:45 -0000
From: "Caspar at Kielwein dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68518] New: ICE on invalid code using lambda in variadic template in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12997
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Caspar at Kielwein dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02574.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4572
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Bug ID: 68518
Summary: ICE on invalid code using lambda in variadic template
in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12997
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Caspar at Kielwein dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36820
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36820&action=edit
preprocessed code that triggers the ice
The following code (with invalid use of constexpr) causes an internal compiler
error.
#include <type_traits>
template<class... dummy> constexpr bool void_check(dummy...) {return 0;}
template<class source_t,class sink_t>
struct connection {
source_t source;
sink_t sink;
template<class param>
auto operator()(const param& p)
-> typename std::enable_if<void_check(source, sink) == 0,
decltype(sink(source(p)))>::type {
return sink(source(p));
}
};
template<class source_t,class sink_t>
auto connect(const source_t& source, const sink_t& sink){
return connection<source_t, sink_t>{source, sink};
}
auto increment = [](int i) -> int {return i+1;};
auto give_one = [](void) ->int {return 1;};
auto one_plus_one = connect(give_one, increment);
I could reproduce it with 4.8, 4.9, 5.2.1 and development snapshot:
gcc version 5.2.1 20151117 (GCC)
both locally and on https://gcc.godbolt.org/
clang rejects the code: error: non-type template argument is not a constant
expression
gcc "-std=gnu++14" -save-temps gcc_bug_check.cpp
gcc_bug_check.cpp: In instantiation of ‘struct connection<<lambda()>,
<lambda(int)> >’:
gcc_bug_check.cpp:20:50: required from ‘auto connect(const source_t&, const
sink_t&) [with source_t = <lambda()>; sink_t = <lambda(int)>]’
gcc_bug_check.cpp:25:48: required from here
gcc_bug_check.cpp:12:40: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c:12997
-> typename std::enable_if<void_check(source, sink) == 0,
^
0x657131 tsubst_copy
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:12997
0x647f68 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:15741
0x6483e1 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:14791
0x648c28 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:14772
0x648831 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:15523
0x649185 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:15234
0x649047 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:14931
0x650562 tsubst_expr
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:14553
0x6514ec tsubst_template_arg
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:9811
0x655b99 tsubst_template_args
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:10372
0x6560c4 tsubst_aggr_type
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:10569
0x64ad69 tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:12543
0x65549b tsubst_function_type
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:11739
0x64b174 tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:12482
0x6578de tsubst_decl
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:10960
0x64b484 tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:11955
0x6582cf tsubst_decl
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:10807
0x64b484 tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:11955
0x662db1 instantiate_class_template_1
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:9470
0x662db1 instantiate_class_template(tree_node*)
../../gcc-5-20151117/gcc/cp/pt.c:9792
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
>From gcc-bugs-return-503648-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:03:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503648-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41060 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:03:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41005 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:03:17 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-bIAoTR2szO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02575.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1517
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 still fails:
Breakpoint 1, gfc_simplify_cshift (array=0x2042670, shift=0x2042880,
dim=<optimized out>) at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/simplify.c:1824
1824 gcc_unreachable ();
(gdb) p array->expr_type
$1 = EXPR_FUNCTION
(gdb) bt
#0 gfc_simplify_cshift (array=0x2042670, shift=0x2042880, dim=<optimized out>)
at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/simplify.c:1824
#1 0x000000000060c252 in do_simplify (specific=specific@entry=0x1ff9c98,
e=e@entry=0x20414d0) at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c:4150
#2 0x0000000000615b4d in gfc_intrinsic_func_interface (
expr=expr@entry=0x20414d0, error_flag=error_flag@entry=1)
at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c:4499
#3 0x000000000065a1ab in resolve_unknown_f (expr=0x20414d0)
at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:2707
#4 resolve_function (expr=0x20414d0)
at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:3002
#5 gfc_resolve_expr (e=0x20414d0)
at ../../src-trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:6334
#6 0x0000000000657aa6 in resolve_operator (e=0x2043020)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503649-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:15:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503649-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105302 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:15:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105217 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 13:15:30 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68221-4-8RGvhOb9nN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02576.txt.bz2
Content-length: 534
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 24 13:14:58 2015
New Revision: 230806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230806&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/68221
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (copy_reference_ops_from_ref): Properly
use mem_ref_offset.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503650-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:17:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503650-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122308 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:17:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121781 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:17:19 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-sCHSfedRVu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02577.txt.bz2
Content-length: 259
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36821&action=edit
gcc5-pr68508.patch
Untested GCC 5 fix.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503651-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:17:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503651-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22476 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:17:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22066 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:17:46 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority
Message-ID: <bug-67714-4-u37uj7vvGE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02578.txt.bz2
Content-length: 398
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Changing back to P3 as it's not my call to make on second thought...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503652-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:23:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503652-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35172 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:23:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34659 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:23:22 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-52BZgktnVL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02579.txt.bz2
Content-length: 934
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36822
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36822&action=edit
gcc6-pr68508.patch
Untested GCC 6 fix.
So, my first patch for this was the gcc5-* one, just let the code ignore the
instrumentation. But the second question is why are we actually instrumenting
this, the cast in that case is from A * to A &, so it is the same class.
And here it seems that DERIVED_FROM_P returns true even for the same type used
as type and base, plus in one of the two cases where the downcast routine is
called the caller already adjusts the op through build_base_path and we already
don't have the original type. My understanding has been that we want to
instrument only downcasts, and A * to A & is not a downcast IMHO. Though,
perhaps for GCC 5.x backport the first patch is safer.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503653-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:36:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503653-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84914 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:36:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84856 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 13:36:28 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68381-4-Pe4Z9EJnrE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02580.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 13:35:56 2015
New Revision: 230809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Testcase for PR rtl-optimization/68381
PR rtl-optimization/68381
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68381.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68381.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503654-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:37:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503654-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86811 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:37:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86735 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:37:08 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68381-4-KE80AdfVkl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02581.txt.bz2
Content-length: 211
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The correctness issue has been fixed.
I'll keep this open for now to investigate the missed optimisation
>From gcc-bugs-return-503655-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:49:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503655-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123391 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:49:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123351 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:49:07 -0000
From: "jbellon at bsc dot es" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68519] New: condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly with float duration
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jbellon at bsc dot es
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02582.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1989
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Bug ID: 68519
Summary: condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly
with float duration
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jbellon at bsc dot es
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36823
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36823&action=edit
preprocessed source file that reproduces the bug
If std::chrono::duration<float> is used as timeout datatype for
std::condition_variable::wait_for, then the thread, apparently, does not become
blocked.
Correct result is got by changing timeout type to
std::chrono::duration<double>.
Expected output:
{{{
Do something...
Do something...
Do something...
Do something...
Exit...
}}}
G++ version and configuration:
Usando especificaciones internas.
COLLECT_GCC=/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/5.1.1/lto-wrapper
Objetivo: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configurado con: ../configure --enable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,ada,go,lto --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
--with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --enable-multilib
--with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions
--enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id
--with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin --enable-initfini-array
--disable-libgcj --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98 --with-isl --enable-libmpx
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --with-tune=generic --with-arch_32=i686
--build=x86_64-redhat-linux
Modelo de hilos: posix
gcc versión 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4) (GCC)
Note: installed in Fedora 22 using official repositories.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503656-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:50:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503656-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124733 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:50:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124659 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:50:09 -0000
From: "jbellon at bsc dot es" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68519] condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly with float duration
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jbellon at bsc dot es
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68519-4-F5dqCTREVo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02583.txt.bz2
Content-length: 502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jorge Bellon <jbellon at bsc dot es> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jbellon at bsc dot es
--- Comment #1 from Jorge Bellon <jbellon at bsc dot es> ---
Created attachment 36824
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36824&action=edit
source file that reproduces the bug
>From gcc-bugs-return-503657-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:55:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503657-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38022 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:55:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37626 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:55:46 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-a4SjXyIBOD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02584.txt.bz2
Content-length: 5959
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed btw. have yet to reduce to sth meaningful (read: hopefully w/o LTO).
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=gmsgid@entry=0x183b3b7 "in %s, at %s:%d")
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1256
#1 0x00000000011c07d4 in fancy_abort (
file=file@entry=0x12deb38
"/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c", line=line@entry=8610,
function=function@entry=0x12dfe30 <vect_is_simple_use(tree_node*,
vec_info*, gimple**, vect_def_type*, tree_node**)::__FUNCTION__>
"vect_is_simple_use")
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1332
#2 0x0000000000c43691 in vect_is_simple_use (operand=<optimized out>,
vinfo=<optimized out>, def_stmt=0x7fffffffd9a0, dt=0x7fffffffd9b0,
vectype=0x7fffffffd998)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:8610
#3 0x0000000000c4fec6 in vectorizable_operation (
stmt=stmt@entry=0x7ffff68b5bb0, gsi=gsi@entry=0x0,
vec_stmt=vec_stmt@entry=0x0, slp_node=slp_node@entry=0x1fd8390)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:4788
#4 0x0000000000c58a03 in vect_analyze_stmt (stmt=0x7ffff68b5bb0,
need_to_vectorize=need_to_vectorize@entry=0x7fffffffda5f,
node=node@entry=0x1fd8390)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:7950
#5 0x0000000000c6fc03 in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations (node=0x1fd8390)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2215
#6 0x0000000000c6fb5f in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations (node=0x1d7ac60)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2206
#7 0x0000000000c744e2 in vect_slp_analyze_operations (slp_instances=...,
data=0x1e02ca0) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2238
#8 0x0000000000c78c95 in vect_slp_analyze_bb_1 (fatal=<synthetic pointer>,
n_stmts=<optimized out>, datarefs=..., region_end=..., region_begin=...)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2522
#9 vect_slp_bb (bb=bb@entry=0x7ffff65dd5b0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2608
(gdb) p expand_location (vect_location)
$2 = {file = 0x1d7e750 "mol.fppized.f90", line = 8342, column = 0,
data = 0x7ffff62e8d20, sysp = false}
The BB part in question is
_1280 = REALPART_EXPR <_380>;
_254 = IMAGPART_EXPR <_380>;
ft_ab2$real_1281 = _1280 * prephitmp_2576;
ft_ab2$imag_258 = _254 * prephitmp_2576;
parm.3489 ={v} {CLOBBER};
_383 = _191 * k_375;
_384 = _383 - _191;
x_385 = MEM[(double[0:D.9712] *)k_pts.0_181][_384];
_388 = _383 + _2591;
y_389 = MEM[(double[0:D.9712] *)k_pts.0_181][_388];
...
REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]> = _834;
IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]> = _1273;
k_468 = k_375 + 1;
if (_366 == k_375)
goto <bb 59>;
else
goto <bb 66>;
thus corresponding roughly to
x = k_pts(k,1) ! SBh_x
y = k_pts(k,2) ! SBh_y
z = k_pts(k,3) ! SBh_z
tmp1 = ft_ab2 * x
tmp2 = ft_ab2 * y
res(basea+1,k) = res(basea+1,k) + tmp1 * x
res(basea+2,k) = res(basea+2,k) + tmp1 * y
res(basea+3,k) = res(basea+3,k) + tmp1 * z
res(basea+4,k) = res(basea+4,k) + tmp2 * y
res(basea+5,k) = res(basea+5,k) + tmp2 * z
res(basea+6,k) = res(basea+6,k) + ft_ab2 * z * z
res(baseb+1,k) = res(baseb+1,k) + tmp1 * x
res(baseb+2,k) = res(baseb+2,k) + tmp1 * y
res(baseb+3,k) = res(baseb+3,k) + tmp1 * z
res(baseb+4,k) = res(baseb+4,k) + tmp2 * y
res(baseb+5,k) = res(baseb+5,k) + tmp2 * z
res(baseb+6,k) = res(baseb+6,k) + ft_ab2 * z * z
and the SLP instance that fails analyzing has the root
REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]> = _962;
IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]> = _852;
and thus corresponds to
_1280 = REALPART_EXPR <_380>;
_254 = IMAGPART_EXPR <_380>;
ft_ab2$real_1281 = _1280 * prephitmp_2576;
ft_ab2$imag_258 = _254 * prephitmp_2576;
...
z_393 = MEM[(double[0:D.9712] *)k_pts.0_181 clique 12 base 2][_392];
...
_1637 = REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]>;
_1645 = IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]>;
_1205 = z_393 * ft_ab2$real_1281;
_1188 = z_393 * ft_ab2$imag_258;
_1171 = z_393 * _1205; <--- this is the def missing a vector type
_1057 = z_393 * _1188;
_962 = _1171 + _1637;
_852 = _1057 + _1645;
REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]> = _962;
IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]> = _852;
the stmt misses a vector type because it is supposed to be built up from
scalars.
And this likely fails to be detected in vect_is_simple_use because of some
issue I waited to have a testcase for ... a case where we have two
SLP instances with conflicting ideas of whether a DEF is to be built from
scalars or not (and thus the "trick" of using STMT_VINFO_VECTORIZABLE
to mark vect_external_defs falls apart).
So maybe I should just try harder to create an artificial testcase for this.
Here some aliasing probably forces both ops to be built from scalar which
then makes us instead build the def from scalars.
The other SLP instance is likely
_1225 = REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]>;
_151 = IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]>;
_834 = _1171 + _1225;
_1273 = _1057 + _151;
REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]> = _834;
IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]> = _1273;
>From gcc-bugs-return-503658-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:56:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503658-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39477 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:56:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39410 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:56:20 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-O3Juvqyx5U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02585.txt.bz2
Content-length: 153
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Is this still a problem?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503659-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 13:59:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503659-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42459 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 13:59:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42432 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 13:59:37 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68517-4-OwNP7mfpPy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02586.txt.bz2
Content-length: 328
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The x86_64 compiler was configured simply with --disable-multilib
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
arm cross compiler configured with:
--without-isl --with-cpu=cortex-a15 --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4 --with-float=hard
>From gcc-bugs-return-503660-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:00:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503660-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43779 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:00:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43663 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-oWCoZD6Rez@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02587.txt.bz2
Content-length: 300
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #20)
> Is this still a problem?
I don't believe so - I've bootstrapped 5.2.1(r230380) all langs incl. Ada and
Java.
Likewise 4.9.3
>From gcc-bugs-return-503661-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:01:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503661-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70366 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:01:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65441 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:01:23 -0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-GZm0vJzDcF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02588.txt.bz2
Content-length: 621
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Is this still a problem?
I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fine. The
only problem I'm seeing for quite a while is that i386-apple-darwin
bootstrap is failing since mid-August (i386-apple-darwin14.4.0 at that
time). Don't have the exact link failure handy, and it certainly
warrants its own bug, if we want to deal with 32-bit bootstrap at all.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-503662-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:04:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503662-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76767 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:04:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76632 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:04:45 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68332] [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68332-4-F0sJivHD8S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02589.txt.bz2
Content-length: 795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs6000_is_valid_and_mask on a reg instead of on a const_int is
not a good idea, as PR68332 and PR67677 as well as testing with
--enable-checking=yes,rtl show. Fix this.
PR target/66217
PR target/67677
PR target/68332
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (and_operand): Check that the operand
is a const_int before calling rs6000_is_valid_and_mask.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
>From gcc-bugs-return-503663-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:04:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503663-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76836 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:04:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76629 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:04:45 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67677] [6 Regression] r226005 causes "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)"
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67677-4-oRxcnKIMj6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02590.txt.bz2
Content-length: 795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67677
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs6000_is_valid_and_mask on a reg instead of on a const_int is
not a good idea, as PR68332 and PR67677 as well as testing with
--enable-checking=yes,rtl show. Fix this.
PR target/66217
PR target/67677
PR target/68332
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (and_operand): Check that the operand
is a const_int before calling rs6000_is_valid_and_mask.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
>From gcc-bugs-return-503664-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:04:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503664-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76933 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:04:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76626 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:04:45 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66217] PowerPC rotate/shift/mask instructions not optimal
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66217-4-JQul2BAL81@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66217-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66217-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02591.txt.bz2
Content-length: 795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:04:11 2015
New Revision: 230811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for and_operand oversight (PR68332, PR67677)
Calling rs6000_is_valid_and_mask on a reg instead of on a const_int is
not a good idea, as PR68332 and PR67677 as well as testing with
--enable-checking=yes,rtl show. Fix this.
PR target/66217
PR target/67677
PR target/68332
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (and_operand): Check that the operand
is a const_int before calling rs6000_is_valid_and_mask.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
>From gcc-bugs-return-503665-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:06:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503665-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79517 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:06:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79428 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:06:23 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-gRJNIsOkWB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02592.txt.bz2
Content-length: 885
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #22)
> > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > Is this still a problem?
>
> I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fine. The
> only problem I'm seeing for quite a while is that i386-apple-darwin
> bootstrap is failing since mid-August (i386-apple-darwin14.4.0 at that
> time). Don't have the exact link failure handy, and it certainly
> warrants its own bug, if we want to deal with 32-bit bootstrap at all.
>
> Rainer
We do - for darwin9/10 at least (perhaps it's not a drama for 11+ .. but a
bootstrap fail indicates something to be looked at IMO).
I will be trying 10.5/6 this week for 5.2.1 (at least) in the run up to the rc
spin.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503666-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:10:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503666-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82254 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:10:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82190 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:10:03 -0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-z5t8O1tHyv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02593.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1058
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #22)
>> > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
>> > Is this still a problem?
>>
>> I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fine. The
>> only problem I'm seeing for quite a while is that i386-apple-darwin
>> bootstrap is failing since mid-August (i386-apple-darwin14.4.0 at that
>> time). Don't have the exact link failure handy, and it certainly
>> warrants its own bug, if we want to deal with 32-bit bootstrap at all.
>>
>> Rainer
>
> We do - for darwin9/10 at least (perhaps it's not a drama for 11+ .. but a
> bootstrap fail indicates something to be looked at IMO).
Ok, I'll dig up the details later today. It may well be related to a
command line tools upgraded corresponding to Xcode 7.x.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-503667-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:10:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503667-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83137 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:10:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83104 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:10:22 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68498] Replace LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES with LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68498-4-zesDlYHBDt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02594.txt.bz2
Content-length: 219
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68498
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36825&action=edit
Tentative patch
>From gcc-bugs-return-503668-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:14:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503668-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93166 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:14:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93118 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:14:41 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68332] [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68332-4-yXyJjRCRMY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68332-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02595.txt.bz2
Content-length: 435
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503670-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:18:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503670-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97155 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:18:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96895 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:18:26 -0000
From: "su at cs dot ucdavis.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68520] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in quick_push, at vec.h:845
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02597.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2216
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Bug ID: 68520
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in
quick_push, at vec.h:845
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
Target Milestone: ---
The following code causes an ICE when compiled with the current gcc trunk at
-O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
It is a regression from 5.2.x.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151122 (experimental) [trunk revision 230719] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
$ gcc-5.2 -O3 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn2’:
small.c:10:1: internal compiler error: in quick_push, at vec.h:845
}
^
0xac60d2 vec<basic_block_def*, va_heap, vl_embed>::quick_push(basic_block_def*
const&)
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/vec.h:845
0xac60d2 vec<basic_block_def*, va_heap, vl_ptr>::quick_push(basic_block_def*
const&)
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/vec.h:1503
0xac60d2 try_shrink_wrapping(edge_def**, bitmap_head*, rtx_insn*)
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/shrink-wrap.c:714
0x870058 thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns()
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/function.c:6021
0x870a92 rest_of_handle_thread_prologue_and_epilogue
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/function.c:6543
0x870a92 execute
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/function.c:6585
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$
------------------------------
int a, b, c, d;
void
fn2 ()
{
if (c)
for (; d; d = a+b)
for (c = 0; c < 2; c++)
fn2 ();
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503669-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:18:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503669-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96462 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:18:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95652 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:18:18 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-DJaBmnZRNa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02596.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3221
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #2)
> > The attribute syntax in the test case doesn't work with gcc. The attributes
> > on the function definitions can't appear at the end.
>
> Placing attributes at the end of the function definition works with Sparse,
> and as far as I can tell with GCC as well. The Linux kernel uses trailing
> attributes on functions (both prototypes and definitions) fairly frequently,
> including with the context attribute.
Experimentally it works with function declarations but not function
definitions.
There was some reason for this (ambiguity with K&R style?), but I forget
exactly.
void declaration(void) __attribute__((const));
void definition(void) __attribute__((const))
{
}
pokyo. gcc --syntax-only q.c
q.c:3:1: error: attributes should be specified before the declarator in a
function definition
void definition(void) __attribute__((const))
^
> In general, it seems useful to have the ability to reference argument names
> in attributes on a function. For instance, imagine using argument names
> rather than indexes for the printf attribute or another attribute like it.
Yeah, I agree.
> The context attribute, though, wants something more complex than that: the
> ability to provide expressions based on those arguments, such as arg->lock.
> That does seem like a tall order.
Ok, it wasn't clear to me exactly what the meaning of that argument was.
>From the original text here it seemed like it would just be a plain name.
So, that's something to nail down. I looked at sparse's test suite but
it doesn't test this construct.
> So I suspect it may make sense to run this after inlining, specialization,
> dead-code elimination, and similar.
One difficulty in this case is choosing how to represent __context__.
My hack makes it a const function, and the value is never used, so gcc
is free to just drop all the calls to it. But the further back in
the pipeline the new pass is added, the harder it is to preserve this.
It would be simpler for the plugin if __context__ were instead another
attribute on a different set of functions. I don't know how hard this
is on the kernel end though.
> I don't mind the use of Python, though I wonder how easily such a script
> could work by default. Given this script, how do you invoke GCC and run it?
> How much stability does this interface provide? Could the Linux kernel ship
> such a script and invoke it as part of the compile, given some dependency
> checks (and likely a Kconfig option if it increases build time
> significantly)?
One nice thing about Python is that because it is so dynamic, it's reasonably
easy to make it adapt to different versions of gcc-python-plugin, if needed.
Running it is easy. The "gcc-with-python2" wrapper script is just a
single line:
${CC:-gcc} -fplugin=python2 -fplugin-arg-python2-script=$@
So, it's really just adding a couple of options to the command line.
It wouldn't be completely nuts to just put the whole gcc-python-plugin source
into the tree. It also wouldn't be too hard to just recode this plugin
in C++.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503671-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:21:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503671-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116235 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:21:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116182 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:21:53 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68520] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in quick_push, at vec.h:845
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68520-4-2WZaOfdki4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02598.txt.bz2
Content-length: 898
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|ICE on valid code at -O3 on |[6 Regression] ICE on valid
|x86_64-linux-gnu in |code at -O3 on
|quick_push, at vec.h:845 |x86_64-linux-gnu in
| |quick_push, at vec.h:845
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503672-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:23:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503672-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77054 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:23:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67658 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:23:00 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-zp254Lplxp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02599.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2455
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sounds like a RA issue to me.
In *.ira we have:
(jump_insn 175 174 176 26 (parallel [
(set (pc)
(if_then_else (lt (plus:SI (reg/v:SI 134 [ runCount ])
(const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff]))
(const_int 0 [0]))
(label_ref 105)
(pc)))
(set (reg/v:SI 152 [ runCount ])
(plus:SI (reg/v:SI 134 [ runCount ])
(const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff])))
(clobber (scratch:SI))
]) pr67954.i:89 759 {*addsi3_cbranch}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 134 [ runCount ])
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 900 (nil)))
-> 105)
and then in *.reload we have:
Choosing alt 4 in insn 175: (0) *?m (1) &l (2) 1 (3) lIJ {*addsi3_cbranch}
...
Choosing alt 1 in insn 175: (0) l (1) X (2) l (3) lL {*addsi3_cbranch}
...
Choosing alt 1 in insn 175: (0) l (1) X (2) l (3) lL {*addsi3_cbranch}
...
Choosing alt 1 in insn 175: (0) l (1) X (2) l (3) lL {*addsi3_cbranch}
...
(jump_insn 175 548 176 26 (parallel [
(set (pc)
(if_then_else (lt (plus:SI (reg:SI 3 r3 [374])
(const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff]))
(const_int 0 [0]))
(label_ref 105)
(pc)))
(set (reg/v:SI 2 r2 [orig:152 runCount ] [152])
(plus:SI (reg:SI 3 r3 [374])
(const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff])))
(clobber (mem/c:SI (reg:SI 2 r2 [437]) [6 %sfp+-32 S4 A32]))
]) pr67954.i:89 759 {*addsi3_cbranch}
(int_list:REG_BR_PROB 900 (nil))
-> 105)
The pattern has
(clobber (match_scratch:SI 1 "=X,X,l,l,&l,&l"))]
If LRA really chooses the alt 1, then the match_scratch has =X constraint, but
I would expect that it would not leave in complete garbage like the memory
dereference that doesn't pass scratch_operand. Vlad?
Note I could only reproduce this on the 5 branch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503673-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:24:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503673-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94976 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92152 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:27 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/63997] gcc.dg/lto/pr61526 failing on darwin
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63997-4-lIkC7l2BDR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02600.txt.bz2
Content-length: 650
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Any objection to apply the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c 2014-08-21
21:02:16.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c 2015-01-15 12:35:36.000000000
+0100
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
/* { dg-lto-do link } */
/* { dg-lto-options { { -fPIC -flto -flto-partition=1to1 } } } */
/* { dg-extra-ld-options { -shared } } */
+/* { dg-extra-ld-options "-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" { target *-*-darwin*
} } */
static void *master;
void *foo () { return master; }
?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503674-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:24:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503674-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95357 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92194 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:28 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68520] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in quick_push, at vec.h:845
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68520-4-XufTHEuEVa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02601.txt.bz2
Content-length: 581
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r227775:
commit 5c2b6d9bed3b944469ab387325476d1188000f46
Author: segher <segher@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Tue Sep 15 00:38:21 2015 +0000
shrink-wrap: Rewrite
>From gcc-bugs-return-503677-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:25:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503677-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97897 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:25:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97250 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:56 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68185-4-804eme9NRc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02604.txt.bz2
Content-length: 947
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:24:24 2015
New Revision: 230812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ree.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503675-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:25:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503675-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97806 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:25:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97229 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:56 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-moV7kAoKxk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02602.txt.bz2
Content-length: 948
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:24:24 2015
New Revision: 230812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ree.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503676-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:25:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503676-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97821 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:25:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97298 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:24:57 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68328] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68328-4-zEd0tseQFl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02603.txt.bz2
Content-length: 948
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:24:24 2015
New Revision: 230812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ree.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503678-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:28:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503678-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103023 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:28:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102833 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:28:23 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-pVp6PRzuu3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02605.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:27:51 2015
New Revision: 230813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
Backport from mainline
2015-11-24 Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ree.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503680-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:28:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503680-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103347 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:28:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102940 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:28:26 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68328] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68328-4-Nr7wQLUANa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02607.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:27:51 2015
New Revision: 230813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
Backport from mainline
2015-11-24 Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ree.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503679-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:28:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503679-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103053 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:28:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102894 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:28:25 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68185-4-Wdxk4pSqq1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02606.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1106
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 24 14:27:51 2015
New Revision: 230813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ree] PR rtl-optimization/68194: Restrict copy instruction in presence of
conditional moves
Backport from mainline
2015-11-24 Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR rtl-optimization/68194
PR rtl-optimization/68328
PR rtl-optimization/68185
* ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Reject copy_needed case if
copies_list is not empty.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c: Likewise.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68185.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68328.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ree.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503681-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:29:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503681-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107247 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:29:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107085 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:29:43 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-IAXODgbisS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02608.txt.bz2
Content-length: 421
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on all active branches.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503682-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:29:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503682-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107405 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:29:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107119 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:29:45 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68321-4-dUvGWu1miy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02609.txt.bz2
Content-length: 494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
Bug 68321 depends on bug 68194, which changed state.
Bug 68194 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503683-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:34:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503683-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56061 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:34:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55995 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:34:49 -0000
From: "nickc at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nickc at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-67702-4-92oVQ8iS9J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02610.txt.bz2
Content-length: 881
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 36826
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36826&action=edit
Workaround
This patch avoids the problem. Not sure if it is the correct fix though.
There is a comment in mangle.c:decl_mangling_context() which says "template
type parms have no mangling context." and it is this which is causing
write_template_prefix() to crash - it assumes that there is always a context
available. But maybe template type parameters should never be passed to
template_write_prefix ?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503684-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:38:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503684-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61984 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:38:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61441 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 14:38:17 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-L0fgiNYLbz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02611.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:03:16PM +0000, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
> 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 still fails:
>
Need an example the code causing the problem. I don't have
access to SPEC CPU 2000.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503685-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:41:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503685-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69536 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:41:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69453 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:41:13 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/63997] gcc.dg/lto/pr61526 failing on darwin
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63997-4-PbeovVSp6r@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02612.txt.bz2
Content-length: 840
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> Any objection to apply the following patch
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c 2014-08-21
> 21:02:16.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr61526_0.c 2015-01-15 12:35:36.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* { dg-lto-do link } */
> /* { dg-lto-options { { -fPIC -flto -flto-partition=1to1 } } } */
> /* { dg-extra-ld-options { -shared } } */
> +/* { dg-extra-ld-options "-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" { target
> *-*-darwin* } } */
>
> static void *master;
> void *foo () { return master; }
>
> ?
This seems reasonable and produces the expected output (an undefined external
_master which is dynamically looked up).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503686-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:45:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503686-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74813 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:45:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74678 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68519] condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly with float duration
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68519-4-2uWMcSRwvW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02613.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4232
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Build with -fsanitize=thread:
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=15270)
Write of size 1 at 0x000000403540 by main thread:
#0 main /var/tmp/t.cc:32 (a.out+0x0000004016d4)
Previous read of size 1 at 0x000000403540 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M10):
Do something...
#0 void thread_loop<std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >
>(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >) /var/tmp/t.cc:17
(a.out+0x000000401ad3)
Do something...
#1 void std::_Bind_simple<void (*(std::chrono::duration<float,
std::ratio<1l, 1l> >))(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l>
>)>::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>)
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/functional:1430
(a.out+0x00000040193e)
#2 std::_Bind_simple<void (*(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l,
1l> >))(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >)>::operator()()
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/functional:1419
(a.out+0x00000040193e)
Do something...
#3 std::thread::_State_impl<std::_Bind_simple<void
(*(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l>
>))(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >)> >::_M_run()
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/thread:186
(a.out+0x00000040193e)
#4 execute_native_thread_routine <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x0000000d082e)
Location is global 'finish' of size 1 at 0x000000403540
(a.out+0x000000403540)
Mutex M10 (0x0000004035a0) created at:
#0 pthread_mutex_lock <null> (libtsan.so.0+0x000000042be0)
Do something...
#1 __gthread_mutex_lock
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bits/gthr-default.h:748
(a.out+0x0000004019ee)
#2 std::mutex::lock()
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/bits/mutex.h:103
(a.out+0x0000004019ee)
#3 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::lock()
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/bits/mutex.h:254
(a.out+0x0000004019ee)
#4 std::unique_lock<std::mutex>::unique_lock(std::mutex&)
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/bits/mutex.h:184
(a.out+0x0000004019ee)
Do something...
#5 void thread_loop<std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >
>(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >) /var/tmp/t.cc:16
(a.out+0x0000004019ee)
#6 void std::_Bind_simple<void (*(std::chrono::duration<float,
std::ratio<1l, 1l> >))(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l>
>)>::_M_invoke<0ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul>)
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/functional:1430
(a.out+0x00000040193e)
#7 std::_Bind_simple<void (*(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l,
1l> >))(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >)>::operator()()
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/functional:1419
(a.out+0x00000040193e)
#8 std::thread::_State_impl<std::_Bind_simple<void
(*(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l>
>))(std::chrono::duration<float, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >)> >::_M_run()
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/include/g++-v6/thread:186
(a.out+0x00000040193e)
Do something...
#9 execute_native_thread_routine <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0x0000000d082e)
Thread T1 (tid=15272, running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create <null> (libtsan.so.0+0x00000002bdd8)
#1 std::thread::_M_start_thread(std::unique_ptr<std::thread::_State,
std::default_delete<std::thread::_State> >, void (*)()) <null>
(libstdc++.so.6+0x0000000d0b34)
Do something...
#2 __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:289 (libc.so.6+0x00000002062f)
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race /var/tmp/t.cc:32 in main
==================
>From gcc-bugs-return-503687-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:49:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503687-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126132 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:49:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126077 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:49:38 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-1IPg1VdN01@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02614.txt.bz2
Content-length: 456
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #22)
> I agree that inline should be faster, if the compiler is reasonably smart,
> if the matrix dimensions are known at compile time (i.e. should be able to
> generate the same kernel). I haven't checked yet.
If the compiler turns out not to be reasonably smart, file a bug report :-)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503688-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 14:56:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503688-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6906 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 14:56:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6838 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 14:56:39 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68520] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in quick_push, at vec.h:845
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68520-4-iE36kMHU7O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02615.txt.bz2
Content-length: 474
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503689-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:13:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503689-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64594 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:13:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64536 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:13:32 -0000
From: "jbellon at bsc dot es" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68519] condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly with float duration
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jbellon at bsc dot es
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68519-4-rA8VRdnXNk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02616.txt.bz2
Content-length: 759
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Jorge Bellon <jbellon at bsc dot es> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #36824|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #3 from Jorge Bellon <jbellon at bsc dot es> ---
Created attachment 36827
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36827&action=edit
source file that reproduces the bug (data race fixed)
I've uploaded again the source file with the fixed data race (typo when
writting the example, sorry).
Now it passes both -fsanitize=thread and -fsanitize=address (but still does not
work as expected).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503690-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:15:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503690-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66894 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:15:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66617 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:15:03 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-h5IC4SPlnu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02617.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2228
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: Final SLP tree for instance:
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]> = _834;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]> = _1273;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 _834 = _1171 + _1225;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 _1273 = _1057 + _151;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 _1171 = z_393 * _1205;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 _1057 = z_393 * _1188;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 _1225 = REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]>;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 _151 = IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_465]>;
and
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: Final SLP tree for instance:
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]> = _962;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]> = _852;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 _962 = _1171 + _1637;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 _852 = _1057 + _1645;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: node
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 0 _1637 = REALPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]>;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: stmt 1 _1645 = IMAGPART_EXPR <MEM[(complex
double[0:D.9703] *)res.0_195][_433]>;
shows that we indeed build _1171 from scalars in one instance but not in
the other.
Ah, so it's because we do
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: Re-trying with swapped operands of stmts 1
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: Build SLP for _1171 = z_393 * _1205;
mol.fppized.f90:8342:0: note: Build SLP for _1057 = z_393 * _1188;
in one case and that one doesn't do the "all operands are built from scalars
thus promote myself". I have a patch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503691-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:16:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503691-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68205 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:16:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67949 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:16:21 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68221-4-8thVa4v7t2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02618.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503692-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:19:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503692-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102509 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:19:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102430 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:19:52 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68517-4-QKC51ju5GE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02619.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
0x00000000017b6b84 in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses (vinfo=0x26aa9f0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
2751 if ((init_b - init_a) % type_size_a != 0)
Missing separate debuginfos, use: zypper install
libgmp10-debuginfo-6.0.0-71.1.x86_64 libisl13-debuginfo-0.14-25.2.x86_64
libmpc3-debuginfo-1.0.2-38.2.x86_64 libmpfr4-debuginfo-3.1.2-3.1.2.x86_64
(gdb) p type_size_a
$1 = 0
(gdb) p debug_data_reference (dra)
#(Data Ref:
# bb: 2
# stmt: arg1_2(D)->f1 = {};
# ref: arg1_2(D)->f1;
# base_object: arg1_2(D)->f1;
#)
Mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503693-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:20:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503693-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103601 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:20:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103577 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:20:39 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68514] [6 Regression] ICE in tr1/5_numerical_facilities libstdc++ test cases
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68514-4-ZAC6YiGK60@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68514-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68514-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02620.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503694-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:23:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503694-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123511 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:23:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123134 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:23:37 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68519] condition_variable::wait_for does not work properly with float duration
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc resolution everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68519-4-lozp42czFr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02621.txt.bz2
Content-length: 985
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68519
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jorge Bellon from comment #3)
> Created attachment 36827 [details]
> source file that reproduces the bug (data race fixed)
>
> I've uploaded again the source file with the fixed data race (typo when
> writting the example, sorry).
>
> Now it passes both -fsanitize=thread and -fsanitize=address (but still does
> not work as expected).
OK. Thanks.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503695-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:33:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503695-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24148 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:33:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24087 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:33:23 -0000
From: "luser.droog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luser.droog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-tE7hvVV3Le@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02622.txt.bz2
Content-length: 374
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #8 from M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog at gmail dot com> ---
Yes, I think it must be something unique to cygwin over windows 10. This code
compiles fine with gcc on cygwin/win8, mingw, linux, suncc on solaris, and even
MSVC. I suppose it could even be something in the POSIX emu layer, and not gcc
per se.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503697-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:35:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503697-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79918 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:35:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73084 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:35:37 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68337] [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in huge resource usage and binaries
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68337-4-8jNcUc10nl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02624.txt.bz2
Content-length: 430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed
>From gcc-bugs-return-503696-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:35:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503696-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68888 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:35:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68864 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 15:35:01 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68337] [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in huge resource usage and binaries
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68337-4-2BWAeqlLKW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02623.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Nov 24 15:34:29 2015
New Revision: 230817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r230796.
2015-11-24 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
PR c/68337
* gimple-fold.c: Include ipa-chkp.h.
(gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op): Don't fold call if we
are going to instrument it and it may copy pointers.
gcc/testsuite/
Backport from mainline r230796.
2015-11-24 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
PR c/68337
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-2.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-1.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68337-2.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/gimple-fold.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503698-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:35:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503698-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80043 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:35:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76000 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:35:39 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-65530-4-N2StL7t70L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65530-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65530-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02625.txt.bz2
Content-length: 520
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug 65530 depends on bug 68337, which changed state.
Bug 68337 Summary: [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in huge resource usage and binaries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503699-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:41:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503699-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56003 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:41:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55969 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:41:30 -0000
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68521] New: [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02626.txt.bz2
Content-length: 871
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
Bug ID: 68521
Summary: [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36828
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36828&action=edit
Code that triggers the ICE.
I got an ICE on the following valid code (this is a 6.0 regression). It was
broken at least since r229945.
gfortran -O2 -fPIC -c avh_olo_qp.f90
avh_olo_qp.f90:99:0:
function r1fun( zz,y1,y2,fy1y2 ) result(rslt)
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
avh_olo_qp.f90:99:0: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6
>From gcc-bugs-return-503700-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:42:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503700-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56849 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:42:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56769 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:41:56 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67226-4-B7ySgqzrNH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02627.txt.bz2
Content-length: 179
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02923.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-503701-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 15:53:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503701-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3154 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 15:53:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3075 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 15:53:35 -0000
From: "izamyatin at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: izamyatin at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-5Ru5Pide3G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02628.txt.bz2
Content-length: 655
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com> ---
This one fails for me with -O2
Subroutine Foo ()
Real(4), Allocatable, Save :: tmp (:, :)
Real(4), Pointer, Save :: arr (:, :, :)
Integer :: l, m, n
tmp = (CSHIFT(CSHIFT(arr (:,:,l),m,2),n,1))
End Subroutine Foo
>From gcc-bugs-return-503702-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:01:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503702-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81686 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:01:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81587 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 16:01:24 -0000
From: "matz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68392] ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: matz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68392-4-BI0LbwT3kP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02629.txt.bz2
Content-length: 421
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: matz
Date: Tue Nov 24 16:00:51 2015
New Revision: 230818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68392
* g++.dg/pr68392.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr68392.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503703-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:03:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503703-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97275 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:03:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97135 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:03:06 -0000
From: "matz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68392] ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: matz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68392-4-g2KTKhtAE1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68392-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02630.txt.bz2
Content-length: 446
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392
Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz <matz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Makes sense, added the test case.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503704-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:11:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503704-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125848 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:11:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125804 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 16:11:29 -0000
From: "nsz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68059] [arm] libgcc uses __write to report error
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68059-4-XKAEjfHChW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02631.txt.bz2
Content-length: 642
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68059
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Nov 24 16:10:55 2015
New Revision: 230820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Backport from mainline
2015-11-23 Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
PR target/68059
* config/arm/linux-atomic-64bit.c (__write): Rename to...
(write): ...this and fix the return type.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/libgcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/libgcc/config/arm/linux-atomic-64bit.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503705-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:23:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503705-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53416 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:23:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53379 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:23:17 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68518] ICE on invalid code using lambda in variadic template in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12997
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68518-4-paryaHIRLV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02632.txt.bz2
Content-length: 477
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503706-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:24:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503706-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58762 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:23:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58640 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:23:54 -0000
From: "afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68522] New: [6 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 435.gromacs miscomparison
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02633.txt.bz2
Content-length: 665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68522
Bug ID: 68522
Summary: [6 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 435.gromacs miscomparison
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
CC: izamyatin at gmail dot com, law at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i686-*-*
There is a miscomparison between actual and reference data after r230364 for
435.gromacs benchmark from SPEC CFP006.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503707-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:24:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503707-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66747 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:24:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66697 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:24:47 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68515] std::result_of<F(X)> doesn't work when F is abstract (with pure virtual functions)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc component
Message-ID: <bug-68515-4-WsntPS07Mr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02634.txt.bz2
Content-length: 481
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68515
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Jon can you have a look?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503708-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:31:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503708-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11363 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:31:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7170 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:31:26 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68495] Error when expanding nontype variadic argument in trailing return type
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68495-4-nCr39FLchM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68495-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68495-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02635.txt.bz2
Content-length: 659
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
Blocks| |55004
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
[Bug 55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503709-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:37:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503709-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1704 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:37:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1613 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:37:06 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68475] ICE: in merge_exception_specifiers, at cp/typeck2.c:2115 with -fno-exceptions on invalid code
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68475-4-bwvvaqPCMR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02636.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68475
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503710-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:38:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503710-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3669 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:38:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3518 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:38:19 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68469] warn_unused_result attribute ignored for templates return templates
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68469-4-mhkQbYjhch@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68469-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68469-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02637.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68469
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503711-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:40:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503711-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18392 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:40:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18327 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:40:39 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-URrkApSgKA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02638.txt.bz2
Content-length: 249
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> This one fails for me with -O2 ...
You don't need any optimization to reproduce. The ICE comes from the nested
CSHIFT.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503712-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:53:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503712-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63397 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:53:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63333 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:53:26 -0000
From: "ysrumyan at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67438] [6 Regression] ~X op ~Y pattern relocation causes loop performance degradation on 32bit x86
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ysrumyan at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67438-4-vo5jXbLKeA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02639.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1680
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438
--- Comment #11 from Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan at gmail dot com> ---
In fact, the problem is quite different although it is caused by non-profitable
pattern matching ~X CMP ~Y -> Y CMP X. In general this pattern may be helpful
if we can delete not operation, e.g.
x1 = ~x;
y1 = ~y;
if (x1 <cmp> y1) ... and there no any other uses of x1 and y1, i.e. x1 and y1
have single use. But if this is not truth we will increase register pressure
since we can not use the same register for x,x1 and y,y1.
Richard proposed to use the same simplification for min/max operations but
in original test-case nested min/max operation (min(x,min(y,z)) or multi
operand min/max (min(x,y,z)) are not recognized by gcc (Note that icc does such
transformation) and so this won't help since we have the same register pressure
issue:
c = ~r;
m = ~g;
y = ~b;
k = min(c, m, y);
*out++ = c - k;
*out++ = m - k;
*out++ = y - k;
*out++ = k;
and we can see that value of 'c' is used in min computation and resulting
store, so if we will use r <cmp> g comparison we will increase live range for
r, g, b variables and additional registers will require for them (till
comparison).
Note also that there exists another issue with path-splitting (aka tail
duplication) which duplicate loop back edge and in fact move tail block to
hammock. This transformation does not loop useful (at least at given stage of
design) but this is another topic for discussion.
I'd like to propose to introduce new predicate for pattern matching which tells
us how much uses have left-hand side of ~x.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503713-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 16:59:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503713-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34841 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 16:59:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34789 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 16:59:08 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/52251] Nonadvancing I/O and the t edit descriptor
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52251-4-wm1SkHcAoN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02640.txt.bz2
Content-length: 171
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk. Should we backport to 5 branch?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503714-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:03:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503714-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43677 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:03:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43602 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:03:02 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68515] std::result_of<F(X)> doesn't work when F is abstract (with pure virtual functions)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68515-4-FuBdK4OAOr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02641.txt.bz2
Content-length: 390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68515
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think it's a front-end problem, it (rightly) says that F(X) is not a valid
function type, because functions can't return abstract types. The problem is
that we don't really have (or want) a function of that type, it's just the
notational trick used by result_of.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503715-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:11:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503715-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55242 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:11:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55046 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:11:15 -0000
From: "guille at cal dot berkeley.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/66214] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with -O0 -g via gen_type_die_with_usage's dwarf2out.c:20250
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: guille at cal dot berkeley.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66214-4-sR17uxhxkp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02642.txt.bz2
Content-length: 721
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
--- Comment #26 from Guille <guille at cal dot berkeley.edu> ---
In the case below (fails to compile ssl.h on OSX 10.9.5),
I could simply go to ssl.h lines 337 and 339 and comment out the
'DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER'..
then it compiled no problem.
(In reply to Guille from comment #24)
> Yes, just checked that.
> 'gcc -g file_that_include_ssl_h.cpp' builds fine, but
> 'g++ -g file_that_include_ssl_h.cpp' ICEs.
>
>
> (In reply to Magnus Fromreide from comment #23)
> > One more question - you are using the command
> >
> > g++ -g file_that_include_ssl_h.cpp
> >
> > right? Building it as C works for me as well.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503716-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:11:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503716-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55948 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:11:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55772 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:11:28 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68464] [6 Regression] ICE in valid constexpr function: ../../src/gcc/tree.c:11497
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68464-4-haPFti9yhi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02643.txt.bz2
Content-length: 697
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68464
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Summary|ICE in valid constexpr |[6 Regression] ICE in valid
|function: |constexpr function:
|../../src/gcc/tree.c:11497 |../../src/gcc/tree.c:11497
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503717-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:13:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503717-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58818 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:13:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58426 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:13:29 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68451] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using decltype with friend inside a class template
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68451-4-ExeucUDYJ5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68451-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68451-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02644.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503718-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:14:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503718-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63250 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:14:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62741 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:14:47 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68487] [concepts] bad "invalid reference to variadic concept" error
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68487-4-xNMDZibKrp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68487-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68487-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02645.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68487
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503719-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:18:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503719-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70197 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:18:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70133 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:18:45 -0000
From: "guille at cal dot berkeley.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/66214] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with -O0 -g via gen_type_die_with_usage's dwarf2out.c:20250
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: guille at cal dot berkeley.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66214-4-c80WJARVEZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02646.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1821
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
--- Comment #27 from Guille <guille at cal dot berkeley.edu> ---
(In reply to Guille from comment #26)
> In the case below (fails to compile ssl.h on OSX 10.9.5),
> I could simply go to ssl.h lines 337 and 339 and comment out the
> 'DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER'..
> then it compiled no problem.
I tested that again. Ignore the above comment.
One can make it compile as follows.
This is the *original* relevant part of ssl.h:
330: struct bn_gencb_st
{
unsigned int ver; /* To handle binary (in)compatibility */
void *arg; /* callback-specific data */
union
335: {
/* if(ver==1) - handles old style callbacks */
void (*cb_1)(int, int, void *)
DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER;
/* if(ver==2) - new callback style */
int (*cb_2)(int, int, BN_GENCB *)
DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER;
340: } cb;
};
take the union outside the struct and give it a name:
union bn_gencb_st__cb_t
{
void (*cb_1)(int, int, void *)
DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER;
int (*cb_2)(int, int, BN_GENCB *)
DEPRECATED_IN_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_7_AND_LATER;
};
struct bn_gencb_st
{
unsigned int ver;
void *arg;
bn_gencb_st__cb_t cb;
};
then it compiles fine.
>
>
> (In reply to Guille from comment #24)
> > Yes, just checked that.
> > 'gcc -g file_that_include_ssl_h.cpp' builds fine, but
> > 'g++ -g file_that_include_ssl_h.cpp' ICEs.
> >
> >
> > (In reply to Magnus Fromreide from comment #23)
> > > One more question - you are using the command
> > >
> > > g++ -g file_that_include_ssl_h.cpp
> > >
> > > right? Building it as C works for me as well.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503720-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:22:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503720-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75237 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:21:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75151 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:21:55 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-fmXyGjLtEC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02647.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #25)
>
> But, that is not particularly impressive, is it? I don't know about current
> low end graphics adapters, but at least the high end GPU cards (Tesla) are
> capable of several Tflops. Of course, there is a non-trivial threshold size
> to amortize the data movement to/from the GPU.
Not even a graphics card, just the on system chip on a low end laptop. Not
trying to impress, just pointing out that the hardware acceleration is fairly
ubiquitous these days, so why not just use it. Maybe not important for serious
computing where users already have things like your 20 core machine.
>
> With the test program from #12, with OpenBLAS (which BTW should be available
> in Fedora 22 as well) I get 337 Gflops/s, or 25 Gflops/s if I restrict it to
> a single core with the OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 environment variable. This on a
> machine with 20 2.8 GHz Ivy bridge cores.
>
> I'm not per se against using GPU's, but I think there's a lot of low hanging
> fruit to be had just by making it easier for users to use a high performance
> BLAS implementation.
I agree, if available external BLAS does what is needed very good, What I am
exploring is one of those external BLAS libraries that uses GPU. Maybe the
answer to this PR is "use an external BLAS" and close this PR.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503721-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:23:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503721-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78520 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:23:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77913 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:23:15 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-1iNd3Unah6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02648.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2049
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Created attachment 36829
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36829&action=edit
Reduced test case for gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90
With the attached test the warnings with '-g -flto' are
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.28.3542
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.36.3560
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.44.3580
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.50.3594
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.56.3608
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.62.3622
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.68.3636
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.74.3650
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.80.3664
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.86.3678
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.92.3690
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.102.3710
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.123.3779
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.131.3805
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.154.3862
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.164.3882
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.174.3905
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.190.3938
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.206.3971
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.222.4004
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.238.4034
warning: (x86_64) could not find object file symbol for symbol _A.250.4057
These warnings disappear if I remove a single 'if'.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503722-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:27:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503722-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85067 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:27:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84988 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:27:45 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-6WlFQSHkXm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02649.txt.bz2
Content-length: 563
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> We are getting a similar issue while linking a program with GCC and
> without '-flto' switch. We enable 'lto' when configuring languages,
> which in turn enables post ld processing inside collect2. This was done
> as part of the bug #61352 patch.
I am not sure to understand the comment. Do you mean that your build is
configured to use '-flto' by default? Do you have a non-fortran reproducer? If
yes, could you please post it?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503723-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:30:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503723-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89058 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:30:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88982 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:30:19 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68513-4-MUovtpT9PL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02650.txt.bz2
Content-length: 274
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A slightly different, but equivalent testcase:
int i;
unsigned u;
volatile unsigned int *e;
void
fn1 (void)
{
(short) ((i ? *e : 0) & ~u | i & u);
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503724-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:31:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503724-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97448 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:31:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97345 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:31:53 -0000
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-qScKgvs15f@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02651.txt.bz2
Content-length: 253
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Just as an update: the series is now tested and hopefully ready to post. I
just need to clear a few things first.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503725-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:35:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503725-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109853 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:35:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109818 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:35:37 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68512] Non-deterministic behavior from gcc
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68512-4-bw20mjl77J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68512-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02652.txt.bz2
Content-length: 368
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68512
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503726-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:43:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503726-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18861 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:43:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18817 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:43:29 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68449] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on atomic_load in C++
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68449-4-vKijZZRFB2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68449-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68449-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02653.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503727-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:45:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503727-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23676 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:45:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23374 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:45:29 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-ZsHTZnHHJ7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02654.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1623
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #29 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #27)
> (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #22)
> If the compiler turns out not to be reasonably smart, file a bug report :-)
what is needed for large matrices (in my opinion) is some simple loop tiling,
as can, in principle, be achieved with graphite : this is my PR14741
Good vectorization, which gcc already does well, just requires the proper
compiler options for the matmul implementation, i.e. '-O3 -march=native
-ffast-math'. However, this would require the Fortran runtime to be compiled
with such options, or at least a way to provide specialized (avx2 etc)
routines.
There is however the related PR (inner loop of matmul) : PR25621, where some
unusual flag combo helps (-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -funroll-loops)
I think external blas and inlining of small matmuls are good things, but I
would expect the default library implementation to reach at least 50% of peak
(for e.g. a 4000x4000 matrix), which is not all that hard. Actually, would be
worth an experiment, but a Fortran loop nest which implements a matmul compiled
with ifort would presumably reach that or higher :-).
These slides show how to reach 90% of peak:
http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/
the code actually is not too ugly, and I think there is no need for the
explicit vector intrinsics with gcc.
I believe I had once a bug report open for small matrices, but this might have
been somewhat fixed in the meanwhile.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503728-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:46:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503728-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24648 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:46:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24557 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:46:03 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68437] [concepts] fold expression, pack expansion, and deduced constraint requirement
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68437-4-NuDgiJuXfz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02655.txt.bz2
Content-length: 575
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68437
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Blocks| |67491
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503729-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:48:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503729-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78167 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:48:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78075 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:48:23 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68434] [concepts] ICE: same canonical type node for different types
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68434-4-3vQvLg9poN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02656.txt.bz2
Content-length: 575
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Blocks| |67491
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503730-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:49:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503730-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89293 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:49:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89184 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:49:53 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68429] [concepts] ICE in in placeholder_extract_concept_and_args, at cp/constraint.cc:1401
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68429-4-XXY8oTCKEO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02657.txt.bz2
Content-length: 658
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68429
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
Blocks| |67491
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503731-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:52:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503731-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97655 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:52:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97611 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:52:00 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68411] Error in template instantiation, cause recursive template reference.
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-68411-4-GqfbacVCLI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02658.txt.bz2
Content-length: 300
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68411
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
>From gcc-bugs-return-503733-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:53:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503733-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107976 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:53:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107858 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:53:23 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68394] [concepts] segfault in valid code
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68394-4-kte7jrDIgF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02660.txt.bz2
Content-length: 575
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68394
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Blocks| |67491
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503732-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 17:53:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503732-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106959 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 17:53:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106857 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 17:53:00 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68395] [concepts] segfault in valid code
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68395-4-1LDm9JQHQx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68395-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68395-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02659.txt.bz2
Content-length: 575
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68395
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
Blocks| |67491
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503736-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:02:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503736-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3599 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:02:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3518 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:02:22 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/67984] [GRAPHITE] internal compiler error: isl_ctx freed, but some objects still reference it
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_known_to_work resolution cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-67984-4-i3AkEEc8ex@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02663.txt.bz2
Content-length: 557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work| |6.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail| |5.2.1
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in trunk gcc 6.0 at r230826.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503737-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:02:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503737-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4316 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:02:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3905 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:02:28 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68388] incomplete type bug when using decltype
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68388-4-Z4Jw4bgibL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02664.txt.bz2
Content-length: 199
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68388
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
This again compiles fine. I'm going to add a testcase and close the bug.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503734-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:02:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503734-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1844 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:02:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1732 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:01:58 -0000
From: "nsz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68059] [arm] libgcc uses __write to report error
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68059-4-55df15bube@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02661.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68059
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
--- Comment #5 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed in r230820 (branch 5) and r230762 (mainline)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503735-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:02:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503735-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1996 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:02:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1770 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 18:01:58 -0000
From: "nenad at intrepid dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nenad at intrepid dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-mrOVOGivCH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02662.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2268
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #6 from Nenad Vukicevic <nenad at intrepid dot com> ---
On 11/24/15 9:27 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
>
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
>> We are getting a similar issue while linking a program with GCC and
>> without '-flto' switch. We enable 'lto' when configuring languages,
>> which in turn enables post ld processing inside collect2. This was done
>> as part of the bug #61352 patch.
>
> I am not sure to understand the comment. Do you mean that your build is
> configured to use '-flto' by default? Do you have a non-fortran reproducer? If
> yes, could you please post it?
>
No, we configured for 'lto' with '--enable-languages' option, but do not
use it, no '-flto' on any of the compiled objects.
However, collect2 tries to find all the objects compiled with lto, it
does not find any, and calls 'post_ld_pass (true)' which executes
'dsymutil'. This was the code that was added in the specified patch,
lines 819-820 of collect2.c. If you configure without LTO you will not
see the problem as 'dsymutil' is not getting called.
If you look at the calls of procedure 'post_ld_pass()' (which calls
dsymutil), I think it calls dsymutil only if true is passed in and
debugging is enabled:
807: post_ld_pass (true); <--- LTO enabled, has LTO compiled objects
(Fortran test issue)
814: post_ld_pass (false); <--- LTO enabled, no LTO objects, force
linking
820: post_ld_pass (true); <--- LTO enabled, NO LTO objects
(My issue)
post_ld_pass (false);
post_ld_pass (false);
post_ld_pass (false);
Maybe line 820 should pass 'false' as this is the case similar to LTO
not being enabled?
I think the problem is in the symbols we generate, or the tool itself,
and this issue shows up only if you have LTO enabled. I can provide the
object file that has problems and this might be enough if someone builds
LLVM on Apple and tries llvm-dsymutil tool on it. This should be the
same tool as Apple's dsymutil, if we can duplicate the problem then we
can debug it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503739-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:17:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503739-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68147 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:17:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68116 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:17:43 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68388] incomplete type bug when using decltype
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68388-4-0zAZkocHGQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02666.txt.bz2
Content-length: 489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68388
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Done.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503738-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:17:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503738-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66564 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:17:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66353 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 18:16:58 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68388] incomplete type bug when using decltype
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68388-4-Vfl9nFJBnP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02665.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68388
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 24 18:16:26 2015
New Revision: 230827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/68388
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68388.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68388.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503740-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:30:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503740-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100261 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:30:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100082 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 18:30:35 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68278] internal compiler error with C++14 polymorphic lambda and type alias
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68278-4-6gBI5VVM9Q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02667.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68278
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 24 18:30:02 2015
New Revision: 230828
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230828&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/68278
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68278.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68278.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503741-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:31:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503741-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101688 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:31:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101588 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:31:22 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68278] internal compiler error with C++14 polymorphic lambda and type alias
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68278-4-oaS3PVeqth@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02668.txt.bz2
Content-length: 489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68278
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Done.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503742-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:38:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503742-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120745 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:38:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120656 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:38:24 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68252] [5 regression] left operand of shift expression, while we shift > 0 integer
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68252-4-3H2Q6LqVEl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68252-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02669.txt.bz2
Content-length: 629
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|wrong-code |rejects-valid
Summary|regiression left operand of |[5 regression] left operand
|shift expression, while we |of shift expression, while
|shift > 0 integer |we shift > 0 integer
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Mainline is fine, anyway.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503743-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:43:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503743-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34500 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:43:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34437 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:43:28 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67089] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Integer overflow checks not optimized on x86/x86_64
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-67089-4-kQ7M8Hjszl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02670.txt.bz2
Content-length: 385
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36830
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36830&action=edit
gcc6-pr67089.patch
Untested patch for matching hand written unsigned addition/subtraction overflow
checks as {ADD,SUB}_OVERFLOW if target has u{add,sub}v4 optabs.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503744-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 18:59:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503744-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11809 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 18:59:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11744 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 18:59:00 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-Pkm2G6TF1w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02671.txt.bz2
Content-length: 724
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Nov 24 18:58:28 2015
New Revision: 230832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68486
* simplify.c (gfc_simplify_cshift): Allow all EXPR_*.
2015-11-24 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68486
* gfortran.dg/simplify_cshift_3.f90
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/simplify_cshift_3.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503745-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:00:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503745-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14054 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:00:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13957 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 18:59:57 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-5xgRY7l7Mw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02672.txt.bz2
Content-length: 114
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unreopen.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503746-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:07:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503746-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41258 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:07:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41192 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 19:07:44 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-UKKbLgniwg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02673.txt.bz2
Content-length: 204
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Added:
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
Is it intended?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503747-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:21:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503747-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20451 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:21:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20389 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 19:21:39 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68416] [MPX] GCC emits a lot of redundant bndmov instructions
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68416-4-3v0vYqTwgU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02674.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1705
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first I thought it is a LRA inheritance bug but after more thorough
analysis I found that the problem comes from IRA. IRA never assigns BND hard
registers to pseudos because it never assigns BNDREGS class to pseudos. After
some investigation I found that ALL_REGS does not contain BNDREGS. IRA starts
with ALL_REGS and uses narrow reg class if the mode is prohibited for some hard
registers. That is why class BNDREGS is never used for pseudos.
The following patch solves the problem:
Index: config/i386/i386.h
===================================================================
--- config/i386/i386.h (revision 230664)
+++ config/i386/i386.h (working copy)
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ enum reg_class
{ 0x1ff1ffff,0xffffffe0, 0x1f }, /* FLOAT_INT_SSE_REGS */ \
{ 0x0, 0x0, 0x1fc0 }, /* MASK_EVEX_REGS */ \
{ 0x0, 0x0, 0x1fe0 }, /* MASK_REGS */ \
-{ 0xffffffff,0xffffffff, 0x1fff } \
+{ 0xffffffff,0xffffffff,0x1ffff } \
}
/* The same information, inverted:
Please, submit the patch to the trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503748-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:24:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503748-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39027 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:24:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38967 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 19:24:48 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc component everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68521-4-4gNhazj55F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02675.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3197
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|fortran |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
The ICE appeared between revisions r228586 (2015-10-07, compiles) and r228678
(2015-10-10, ICE). The test compiles with -O1 but not with -O2.
Backtrace
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (stmt=<optimized out>,
strict_overflow_p=<optimized out>, depth=<optimized out>)
at ../../_clean/gcc/gimple-fold.c:6251
6251 switch (gimple_code (stmt))
(gdb) bt
#0 gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (stmt=<optimized out>,
strict_overflow_p=<optimized out>, depth=<optimized out>)
at ../../_clean/gcc/gimple-fold.c:6251
#1 0x000000010068ee65 in tree_expr_nonnegative_p (t=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/fold-const.c:13182
#2 0x00000001001e4948 in generic_simplify (loc=<optimized out>,
code=<optimized out>, type=<optimized out>, op0=<optimized out>)
at generic-match.c:6639
#3 0x000000010069f244 in fold_unary_loc (loc=<optimized out>, code=<optimized
out>, type=<optimized out>, op0=<optimized out>)
at ../../_clean/gcc/fold-const.c:7625
#4 0x00000001006a072a in fold_build1_stat_loc (loc=<optimized out>,
code=<optimized out>, type=<optimized out>, op0=<optimized out>)
at ../../_clean/gcc/fold-const.c:12288
#5 0x00000001009c7aaf in gimplify_build1 (gsi=<optimized out>, code=<optimized
out>, type=<optimized out>, a=<optimized out>)
at ../../_clean/gcc/tree-cfg.c:8475
#6 0x00000001009d7ca0 in tree_lower_complex () at
../../_clean/gcc/tree-complex.c:1113
#7 0x00000001009d8b62 in ?? () at ../../_clean/gcc/tree-complex.c:1723
#8 0x00000001008c390f in execute_one_pass (pass=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/passes.c:2335
#9 0x00000001008c3f28 in execute_pass_list_1 (pass=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/passes.c:2408
#10 0x00000001008c3f3a in execute_pass_list_1 (pass=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/passes.c:2409
#11 0x00000001008c3f8d in execute_pass_list (fn=<optimized out>,
pass=<optimized out>) at ../../_clean/gcc/passes.c:2419
#12 0x000000010057a266 in cgraph_node::expand (this=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1965
#13 0x000000010057ba0f in symbol_table::compile (this=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2101
#14 0x000000010057daa4 in symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit
(this=<optimized out>) at ../../_clean/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2514
#15 0x000000010098fb4e in compile_file () at ../../_clean/gcc/toplev.c:489
#16 0x0000000100d8b983 in ?? ()
#17 0x0000000100d8d349 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff5fbff300) at
../../_clean/gcc/main.c:39
Revision r228614?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503749-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:40:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503749-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113877 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:40:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113776 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 19:40:40 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-zwfs9GM8Xs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02676.txt.bz2
Content-length: 708
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:07:44PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
>
> --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > Added:
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
>
> Is it intended?
>
Of course, not. Hmmm, seems I fat-fingered commit.
% svn commit gcc/fortran/ChangeLog gcc/fortran/simplify.c \
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/simplify_cshift_3.f90 gcc/testsuite/
Not sure how the gcc/testsuite got on the end. Oh well, the
testcase won't hurt anything.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503750-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:43:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503750-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128364 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:43:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128300 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 19:43:18 -0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-CTk4hUwJSX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02677.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1295
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> Ok, I'll dig up the details later today. It may well be related to a
> command line tools upgraded corresponding to Xcode 7.x.
Here's what I found: in stage2, linking gcj fails with
ld: in ../libiberty/libiberty.a(make-temp-file.o), in section __TEXT,__text
reloc 17: unsupported r_length=0 for scattered vanilla reloc for architecture
i386
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [gcj] Error 1
ld is
@(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-253.6
configured to support archs: armv6 armv7 armv7s arm64 i386 x86_64 x86_64h
armv6m armv7k armv7m armv7em (tvOS)
LTO support using: Apple LLVM 7.0.0 (clang-700.1.76)
on
Darwin llaima.fritz.box 15.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.2.0: Fri Nov 13
19:43:59 PST 2015; root:xnu-3248.20.55~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
otool -r shows
build/libiberty/make-temp-file.o:
Relocation information (__TEXT,__text) 54 entries
address pcrel length extern type scattered symbolnum/value
[...]
00000257 0 0 n/a 0 1 0x000003c0
which is (with -rv)
00000257 False byte n/a VANILLA True 0x000003c0
No idea what ld is complaining about here, though.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-503751-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:48:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503751-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21179 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:48:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21077 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 19:48:20 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-Eviz9T0aRz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02678.txt.bz2
Content-length: 503
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Not sure how the gcc/testsuite got on the end. Oh well, the
> testcase won't hurt anything.
[Book15] f90/bug% gfca /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90:21:0:
forall (i=1:n) y(i)%a = x
internal compiler error: in gfc_do_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:3130
without your fix for pr68227.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503752-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 19:51:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503752-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25822 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 19:51:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25396 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 19:51:50 -0000
From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-B3FwFxr3Fr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02679.txt.bz2
Content-length: 676
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Are there any symbols in .text? If so, this is wrong. All symbols have to
have 1 or more bytes after them. This is just how the ABI is. The creator of
a symbol with no content after is needs to be fixed, if so. gcc_unreablable is
one way to zap things so that there is no nop.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:07:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61351 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:07:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61295 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 20:07:34 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-eDEvbxsh6R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02680.txt.bz2
Content-length: 909
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:48:19PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
>
> --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > Not sure how the gcc/testsuite got on the end. Oh well, the
> > testcase won't hurt anything.
>
> [Book15] f90/bug% gfca /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90:21:0:
>
> forall (i=1:n) y(i)%a = x
>
>
> internal compiler error: in gfc_do_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:3130
>
> without your fix for pr68227.
>
Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything.
FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The
issue with EXPR_FUNCTION and cshift is a problem.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503754-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:07:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503754-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62115 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:07:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61752 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 20:07:41 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-Hkf5CKxAwN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02681.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2481
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nenad Vukicevic from comment #6)
> On 11/24/15 9:27 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
I suspect we have two issues here:
> Maybe line 820 should pass 'false' as this is the case similar to LTO
> not being enabled?
That seems reasonable a first blush, we should _not_ call dsymutil for
gcc foo.o bar.o -g -o t
And we plainly do..
The purpose of dsymutil on the link line is to preserve debug info from
temporary files.
so for:
gcc foo.c -g -o t
/tmp/blah-foo.o is created and used to link "t"
... but t doesn't contain the debug info (only references to the .o files) and
the (/tmp) .o files will be deleted at the end of the link. Step in dsymutil
which links the debug info into a t.dSYM .. and we're all happy.
Normally for
gcc foo.o bar.o -g -o t
there is no need for dsymutil because foo.o and bar.o (which contain the debug
data) will be available after the link.
In the case of an lto link:
gcc foo.o bar.o -flto -g -o t
now we have a situation where, if foo.o, bar.o (or both) contain lto data this
will be linked - and then the compiler will run generating a /tmp/lto-blah.o
based on the lto'd input. This temp file will be deleted one the final link is
done - and we'd be back to losing debug info.
So we have it run dsymutil if we're doing lto, and a temporary file is created.
We seem to have the logic wrong / insufficient so that it is getting run when
there is no (apparent) need.
----
I's not immediately obvious that clang is DTRT if it doesn't run dsymutil for
the same scenario (but let's leave that to one side for now).
----
> I think the problem is in the symbols we generate, or the tool itself,
> and this issue shows up only if you have LTO enabled. I can provide the
> object file that has problems and this might be enough if someone builds
> LLVM on Apple and tries llvm-dsymutil tool on it. This should be the
> same tool as Apple's dsymutil, if we can duplicate the problem then we
> can debug it.
So I agree, the root problem is that we are creating something that the newer
version of dsymutil doesn't understand - it could be we're making a mistake or
new dsymutil could be still green.
I've got a TOT clang build and will investigate a bit.
What happens if you do a clang link and then do "dsymutil result"?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:10:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70516 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:09:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70442 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 20:09:53 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-Bcr0dsNBkE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02682.txt.bz2
Content-length: 5777
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #4 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #3)
> (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #2)
>
> > > The attribute syntax in the test case doesn't work with gcc. The attributes
> > > on the function definitions can't appear at the end.
> >
> > Placing attributes at the end of the function definition works with Sparse,
> > and as far as I can tell with GCC as well. The Linux kernel uses trailing
> > attributes on functions (both prototypes and definitions) fairly frequently,
> > including with the context attribute.
>
> Experimentally it works with function declarations but not function
> definitions.
> There was some reason for this (ambiguity with K&R style?), but I forget
> exactly.
>
> void declaration(void) __attribute__((const));
>
> void definition(void) __attribute__((const))
> {
> }
>
> pokyo. gcc --syntax-only q.c
> q.c:3:1: error: attributes should be specified before the declarator in a
> function definition
> void definition(void) __attribute__((const))
> ^
OK, that explains a lot. The kernel extensively uses trailing attributes on
declarations, but a more careful look shows that the *only* trailing attributes
used in definitions appear via macros that only have non-empty definitions for
Sparse. And Sparse parses those just fine.
Unfortunate, and I'd love to see GCC handle trailing attributes (does a bug
already exist for that somewhere?), but not something that should block *this*
feature.
(As a vaguely related aside, how does GCC disambiguate whether an attribute
preceding the function declaration or definition applies to the return type or
to the function? I really hope that doesn't depend on the specific attribute.)
> > In general, it seems useful to have the ability to reference argument names
> > in attributes on a function. For instance, imagine using argument names
> > rather than indexes for the printf attribute or another attribute like it.
>
> Yeah, I agree.
>
> > The context attribute, though, wants something more complex than that: the
> > ability to provide expressions based on those arguments, such as arg->lock.
> > That does seem like a tall order.
>
> Ok, it wasn't clear to me exactly what the meaning of that argument was.
> From the original text here it seemed like it would just be a plain name.
> So, that's something to nail down. I looked at sparse's test suite but
> it doesn't test this construct.
Because Sparse doesn't actually do anything with that argument yet other than
parse it. :)
The theory was that Sparse would associate locks with actual objects, and match
them up. (And/or feed that information into a runtime checker.) But since
Sparse doesn't have the necessary semantic analysis to check if two expressions
refer to the same object, and probably never will, that didn't happen.
GCC, on the other hand, has alias analysis and similar. It doesn't seem too
ridiculous for GCC to detect that arg->lock in two successive function calls
refers to the same location.
> > So I suspect it may make sense to run this after inlining, specialization,
> > dead-code elimination, and similar.
>
> One difficulty in this case is choosing how to represent __context__.
> My hack makes it a const function, and the value is never used, so gcc
> is free to just drop all the calls to it. But the further back in
> the pipeline the new pass is added, the harder it is to preserve this.
>
> It would be simpler for the plugin if __context__ were instead another
> attribute on a different set of functions. I don't know how hard this
> is on the kernel end though.
Well, on the one hand, the compiler-specific header files could easily enough
provide a different definition for Sparse and GCC. On the other hand, it seems
unfortunate if the syntax doesn't actually match Sparse. On the third hand,
very few users exist *outside* the kernel, and Sparse could potentially support
a new syntax as well.
Could you represent __context__ as a new GCC builtin? Would that make this any
easier?
Sparse actually tracks context as a property of basic blocks.
> > I don't mind the use of Python, though I wonder how easily such a script
> > could work by default. Given this script, how do you invoke GCC and run it?
> > How much stability does this interface provide? Could the Linux kernel ship
> > such a script and invoke it as part of the compile, given some dependency
> > checks (and likely a Kconfig option if it increases build time
> > significantly)?
>
> One nice thing about Python is that because it is so dynamic, it's reasonably
> easy to make it adapt to different versions of gcc-python-plugin, if needed.
>
> Running it is easy. The "gcc-with-python2" wrapper script is just a
> single line:
>
> ${CC:-gcc} -fplugin=python2 -fplugin-arg-python2-script=$@
>
> So, it's really just adding a couple of options to the command line.
>
> It wouldn't be completely nuts to just put the whole gcc-python-plugin source
> into the tree. It also wouldn't be too hard to just recode this plugin
> in C++.
I don't think it makes sense to put all of gcc-python-plugin into Linux. And
from what I can tell, distribution packages typically ship this separately (if
they ship it at all; AFAICT Debian only ships gcc-python3-plugin).
So, I suspect the unfortunate answer is that Linux would probably want to ship
the plugin as C/C++ and build it at build time if enabled. (Or we could
integrate this functionality into GCC itself.) But despite that, Python seems
like a great way to prototype it while we nail down the semantics more
precisely.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:31:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85804 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:31:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85711 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 20:31:02 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-Cobgl3kKCO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02683.txt.bz2
Content-length: 511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > Maybe line 820 should pass 'false' as this is the case similar to LTO
> > not being enabled?
>
> That seems reasonable a first blush, we should _not_ call dsymutil for
I made this change on gcc-5.2.1 and it appears to DTRT (I think we need to find
the original PR that got this introduced, and check we're not missing some
corner-case tho).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:37:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107472 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:37:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107387 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 20:37:08 -0000
From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-KC44UlRmAZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02684.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1469
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #5 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #4)
> (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #3)
> (As a vaguely related aside, how does GCC disambiguate whether an attribute
> preceding the function declaration or definition applies to the return type
> or to the function? I really hope that doesn't depend on the specific
> attribute.)
AFAIK, you can't put an attribute on the return type, it'll be interpreted as a
function attribute instead (and on definitions you can't place them after the
function arguments). the only way to put attrs on the return type is via a
typedef.
> Could you represent __context__ as a new GCC builtin? Would that make this
> any easier?
it can be a builtin or just a regular function declaration, the latter is easy
to create from a plugin too.
> So, I suspect the unfortunate answer is that Linux would probably want to
> ship the plugin as C/C++ and build it at build time if enabled. (Or we could
> integrate this functionality into GCC itself.)
since PaX already has a checker plugin i subscribed to this bug a while ago but
completely forgot about it until now ;P. in any case, i've begun to work on
this along a somewhat different angle: instead of adding completely new
machinery to detect context imbalances i'd like to reuse existing gcc passes to
compute this property, we'll see how it goes.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503758-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:38:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503758-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109496 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:38:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109470 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 20:38:49 -0000
From: "kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68523] New: CFG Expansion Computes Incorrect Block Frequencies for Nested Loops
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02685.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2170
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68523
Bug ID: 68523
Summary: CFG Expansion Computes Incorrect Block Frequencies for
Nested Loops
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With a debug version of gcc, compile the following program with the
command-line options:
-S -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -da
void foo(double *d, unsigned long int n) {
unsigned long int i, j;
for (j = 0; j < 10000002; j++) {
for (i=0;i<n;i++) {
d[i*2] = 0.0;
}
}
}
Note that the outer-loop iteration count is a compile-time constant and the
inner-nested loop's iteration count is determined at run time.
The dump file with .expand file name extension that is produced by the gcc
compiler represents the inner-nested loop as block B5, and the outer-nested
loop as blocks B7, B5, and B6.
As reported by the dump file, the complete function, following control-flow
graph expansion, is represented by the following control-flow graph:
ENTRY:9 -> B2(100%)
B2:9 -> B4(100%)
B4:9 -> B7(100%)
B7:900 -> B5(100%)
B5:9100 -> B5(91%); B6(9%)
B6:900 -> B7(99%); B9(1%)
B9:9 -> EXIT(100%)
EXIT:9
There are several inconsistencies in the reported frequencies.
Note that the predecessors of B5 have combined frequency 900 + 91% of 9100 =
900 + 8281 = 9181 which does not equal the frequency of B5 (9100).
Also, note that predecessors of B6 have combined frequency 9% of 9100 = 819,
which does not equal 900, the frequency of B6.
To correct the error, block B5 should have frequency 10,000. The value 10,000
can be computed by dividing 900, the combined frequency of edges entering this
run-time bounded loop, by 0.09. Dividing by this magic number 0.09 corresponds
to the heuristic that each conditional exit from a loop whose iteration bounds
are determined at run-time has probability 9% of exiting the loop and 91% of
remaining inside the loop.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503759-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:40:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503759-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111562 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:40:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111489 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 20:40:42 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68196] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68196-4-wQXu9I36iV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02686.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Nov 24 20:40:10 2015
New Revision: 230839
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230839&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* class.c (has_finalizer_component): Prevent infinite recursion
through this function if the derived type and that of its
component are the same.
* trans-types.c (gfc_get_derived_type): Do the same for proc
pointers by ignoring the explicit interface for the component.
PR fortran/66465
* check.c (same_type_check): If either of the expressions is
BT_PROCEDURE, use the typespec from the symbol, rather than the
expression.
2015-11-24 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90: New test.
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/66465
* gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/check.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/class.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503760-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:40:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503760-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111573 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:40:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111492 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 20:40:42 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66465] Procedure pointer component & non-component interpreted as different type or kind
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66465-4-QBwdKzirM9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02687.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Nov 24 20:40:10 2015
New Revision: 230839
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230839&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-24 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* class.c (has_finalizer_component): Prevent infinite recursion
through this function if the derived type and that of its
component are the same.
* trans-types.c (gfc_get_derived_type): Do the same for proc
pointers by ignoring the explicit interface for the component.
PR fortran/66465
* check.c (same_type_check): If either of the expressions is
BT_PROCEDURE, use the typespec from the symbol, rather than the
expression.
2015-11-24 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90: New test.
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/66465
* gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/check.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/class.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503761-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:56:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503761-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120866 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 20:56:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120787 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 20:56:10 -0000
From: "nenad at intrepid dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nenad at intrepid dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-Duiv0Kkk2L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02688.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1309
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #9 from Nenad Vukicevic <nenad at intrepid dot com> ---
On 11/24/15 12:07 PM, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So I agree, the root problem is that we are creating something that the newer
> version of dsymutil doesn't understand - it could be we're making a mistake or
> new dsymutil could be still green.
I tried to run Clang's llvm-dsymutil form the locally built clang tools.
Fails the same way. And the error is coming from this routine:
124 /// Interpret the STAB entries to fill the DebugMap.
125 void MachODebugMapParser::handleStabSymbolTableEntry(uint32_t
> What happens if you do a clang link and then do "dsymutil result"?
Linking with clang and "dsymutil result" produces similar results -
'failed to insert symbol' messages. But then it complains on lots of
object files as it cannot find them.
I checked the clang code (and some logs) and clang does NOT call
dsymutil for our case.
Note that we are compiling through a fairly complex UPC driver, part of
Berkeley UPC toolset, and we get this warnings only if our back-end
compiler is GCC from our GNU UPC branch (which is in sync with the
trunk). Using Clang as back-end compiler does not produce warning as
they do not run the tool at the and - linking phase.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503762-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:10:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503762-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10313 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:10:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10238 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 21:10:37 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-JJnpQSQVby@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02689.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2056
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #4)
> Unfortunate, and I'd love to see GCC handle trailing attributes (does a bug
> already exist for that somewhere?), but not something that should block
> *this*
> feature.
Offhand I don't know if there is a bug covering this.
> (As a vaguely related aside, how does GCC disambiguate whether an attribute
> preceding the function declaration or definition applies to the return type
> or
> to the function? I really hope that doesn't depend on the specific
> attribute.)
It does, see the various *_required fields in struct attribute_spec
(tree-core.h). It's worse than you think, as I believe a given
attribute handler can decide where to put the attribute based on any
criteria it likes.
> Could you represent __context__ as a new GCC builtin? Would that make this
> any
> easier?
It's basically the same thing.
One idea might be not to make the function const; then have the pass
rip out the calls to it.
However then you might have a situation where these calls formerly
interfered with some optimization, meaning that their presence did
affect code generation. I don't really know if this is possible.
> Sparse actually tracks context as a property of basic blocks.
I was thinking this might be doable but I don't really know how
gcc handles basic block coalescing -- if two blocks are merged
we'd want to ensure that the resulting block ends up with the
correct context property.
It might help to see exactly where __context__ is used in real code.
> (if
> they ship it at all; AFAICT Debian only ships gcc-python3-plugin).
The version of python doesn't matter much.
For people whose distro doesn't package gcc-python-plugin, it is simple
to build; just git clone + make.
> So, I suspect the unfortunate answer is that Linux would probably want to
> ship
> the plugin as C/C++ and build it at build time if enabled.
That's also fine, it's easy(-ish) to rewrite.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503763-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:15:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503763-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21282 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:15:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19232 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 21:15:04 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-uBN8WSZs1m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02690.txt.bz2
Content-length: 234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to PaX Team from comment #5)
> since PaX already has a checker plugin
Why not just contribute that then?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503764-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:24:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503764-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38118 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:24:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38053 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2015 21:23:57 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68520] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in quick_push, at vec.h:845
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68520-4-K76cd1qdEb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02691.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1678
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 24 21:23:25 2015
New Revision: 230843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
shrink-wrap: Fix thinko (PR68520)
Part of the shrink-wrapping algorithm has this comment:
/* Now see if we can put the prologue at the start of PRO. Putting it
there might require duplicating a block that cannot be duplicated,
or in some cases we cannot insert the prologue there at all. If PRO
wont't do, try again with the immediate dominator of PRO, and so on.
The blocks that need duplicating are those reachable from PRO but
not dominated by it. We keep in BB_WITH a bitmap of the blocks
reachable from PRO that we already found, and in VEC a stack of
those we still need to consider (to find successors). */
Two of the cases that push to that stack do not actually check the
bitmap first. Either I thought those blocks could not be on the stack
already, or more likely I didn't think and it just didn't crash during
any testing. But of course those blocks *can* already be on the stack
(if you have a hideous loop structure), and then we end up with the
same block on the stack more than once. This is harmless, except that
(like in the PR) this can overflow the stack.
This fixes it, by doing the necessary bitmap checks before pushing.
PR rtl-optimization/68520
* shrink-wrap.c (try_shrink_wrapping): Don't push a block to VEC if
its bit was already set in BB_WITH.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/shrink-wrap.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503766-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:29:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503766-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51957 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:29:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51889 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 21:29:55 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68520] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in quick_push, at vec.h:845
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68520-4-LQ8czQEBWB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02693.txt.bz2
Content-length: 459
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68520
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed. Thanks for the report!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503765-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:29:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503765-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51167 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:29:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51087 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 21:29:35 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-MI3GNIM5Xn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02692.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1189
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #8 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to PaX Team from comment #5)
> (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #4)
> > Could you represent __context__ as a new GCC builtin? Would that make this
> > any easier?
>
> it can be a builtin or just a regular function declaration, the latter is
> easy to create from a plugin too.
Except as Tom noted, GCC will throw away a regular function declaration early
on, whereas it can handle a builtin differently.
> > So, I suspect the unfortunate answer is that Linux would probably want to
> > ship the plugin as C/C++ and build it at build time if enabled. (Or we could
> > integrate this functionality into GCC itself.)
>
> since PaX already has a checker plugin i subscribed to this bug a while ago
> but completely forgot about it until now ;P. in any case, i've begun to work
> on this along a somewhat different angle: instead of adding completely new
> machinery to detect context imbalances i'd like to reuse existing gcc passes
> to compute this property, we'll see how it goes.
Interesting idea. What'd you have in mind?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503767-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:36:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503767-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64361 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:36:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64329 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 21:36:01 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68524] New: Please support attributes between function definition and opening brace
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02694.txt.bz2
Content-length: 984
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68524
Bug ID: 68524
Summary: Please support attributes between function definition
and opening brace
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: josh at joshtriplett dot org
Target Milestone: ---
GCC supports placing attributes after the closing parenthesis of a function
declaration and before the semicolon. However, GCC produces an error on
attributes between the closing parenthesis of a function definition and the
opening brace; for instance:
void f(void) __attribute__((const))
{
}
test.c:1:1: error: attributes should be specified before the declarator in a
function definition
void f(void) __attribute__((const))
^
Sparse's C parser supports this. Could GCC support this syntax as well?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503768-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 21:46:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503768-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130012 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 21:46:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129910 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 21:46:48 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-6YL0UWD5Zy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02695.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2467
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #9 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #6)
> (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #4)
> > Unfortunate, and I'd love to see GCC handle trailing attributes (does a bug
> > already exist for that somewhere?), but not something that should block
> > *this*
> > feature.
>
> Offhand I don't know if there is a bug covering this.
Filed as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68524 .
> > Sparse actually tracks context as a property of basic blocks.
>
> I was thinking this might be doable but I don't really know how
> gcc handles basic block coalescing -- if two blocks are merged
> we'd want to ensure that the resulting block ends up with the
> correct context property.
Right; this would need specific handling when manipulating basic blocks.
> It might help to see exactly where __context__ is used in real code.
A few patterns:
First, you can use __context__(some_lock, 1, 1) to assert that you hold
some_lock.
Second, you can use __context__(some_lock, 0, 1) to note that you have acquired
some_lock; that may make sense within the definition of a lock acquisition
function, since the function's declaration will have a context attribute saying
it returns with the lock held, and the body needs to match that. It also makes
sense in the body of a lock acquisition macro.
Third, ditto for __context__(some_lock, 1, 0) and lock release functions.
And fourth, see the definition of __cond_lock:
# define __acquire(x) __context__(x,1)
# define __release(x) __context__(x,-1)
# define __cond_lock(x,c) ((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0)
You can then define a wrapper for a trylock function:
#define trylock(l) __cond_lock(l, trylock(l))
If you then use this in an if, the compiler can know that one path has a
different context than the other:
/* l has context 0 */
if (trylock(l)) {
/* l has context 1 */
} else {
/* l still has context 0 */
}
> > (if
> > they ship it at all; AFAICT Debian only ships gcc-python3-plugin).
>
> The version of python doesn't matter much.
>
> For people whose distro doesn't package gcc-python-plugin, it is simple
> to build; just git clone + make.
Sparse requires exactly the same, but even that level of difficulty means a
tiny fraction of people building kernels actually use it. Integrating it with
GCC means it could work automatically for everyone.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503769-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 22:26:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503769-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90101 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 22:26:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89911 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 22:26:18 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 22:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-xjsUKk1f0d@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02696.txt.bz2
Content-length: 797
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #10 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #9)
> > It might help to see exactly where __context__ is used in real code.
>
> A few patterns:
Sorry, I wasn't very clear.
It seems to me that __context__ must be used as a kind of annotation
alongside some effect-ful statement. I'm curious what those statements
are; and whether we could somehow annotate them directly.
(I presume not since sparse didn't go that route, but I figured I'd ask.)
> Sparse requires exactly the same, but even that level of difficulty means a
> tiny fraction of people building kernels actually use it. Integrating it
> with GCC means it could work automatically for everyone.
Yeah, makes sense.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503770-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 22:36:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503770-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62111 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 22:36:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62020 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 22:36:40 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 22:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-SLdHEz4fE0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02697.txt.bz2
Content-length: 931
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #11 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #10)
> (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #9)
>
> > > It might help to see exactly where __context__ is used in real code.
> >
> > A few patterns:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't very clear.
> It seems to me that __context__ must be used as a kind of annotation
> alongside some effect-ful statement. I'm curious what those statements
> are; and whether we could somehow annotate them directly.
> (I presume not since sparse didn't go that route, but I figured I'd ask.)
Such statements could potentially consist of inline assembly implementing a
lock. __context__ potentially helps when implementing things as a macro.
That said, if absolutely necessary, I could imagine using exclusively the
context attribute and appropriate static inlines with that attribute.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503771-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 23:04:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503771-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21105 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 23:04:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21064 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 23:04:22 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55606] sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not supported
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: FIXME, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc
Message-ID: <bug-55606-4-tw2p40V4fH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02698.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2012-12-09 00:00:00 |2015-11-24
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A similar test case not involving arrays:
$ cat z.c && /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc -S -Wall
-Wextra -o/dev/null -xc++ z.c
typedef struct A {
int i;
struct { int a, b; } s;
} A;
A a = { 1, .s = { 2, 3 } };
A b = { .i = 1, .s = { 2, 3 } };
A c = { .s = { 2, 3 }, .i = 1 };
z.c:8:31: sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not
supported
A c = { .s = { 2, 3 }, .i = 1 };
^
z.c:8:31: sorry, unimplemented: non-trivial designated initializers not
supported
>From gcc-bugs-return-503772-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 23:24:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503772-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66690 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 23:24:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66651 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 23:24:04 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68523] CFG Expansion Computes Incorrect Block Frequencies for Nested Loops
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc component everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68523-4-z5eVrrpfod@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02699.txt.bz2
Content-length: 699
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68523
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-24
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|rtl-optimization |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. The loops start out just fine, but tree-ssa-loop-ch
messes it up.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503773-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 23:27:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503773-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70103 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 23:27:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70042 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 23:27:09 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68358] Some tests in gfortran.dg fail when compiled with '-g -flto' and Xcode 7
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68358-4-IEXTSeRp7K@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02700.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2417
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68358
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nenad Vukicevic from comment #9)
> On 11/24/15 12:07 PM, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > So I agree, the root problem is that we are creating something that the newer
> > version of dsymutil doesn't understand - it could be we're making a mistake or
> > new dsymutil could be still green.
>
> I tried to run Clang's llvm-dsymutil form the locally built clang tools.
> Fails the same way. And the error is coming from this routine:
>
> 124 /// Interpret the STAB entries to fill the DebugMap.
> 125 void MachODebugMapParser::handleStabSymbolTableEntry(uint32_t
>
>
> > What happens if you do a clang link and then do "dsymutil result"?
>
> Linking with clang and "dsymutil result" produces similar results -
> 'failed to insert symbol' messages. But then it complains on lots of
> object files as it cannot find them.
>
> I checked the clang code (and some logs) and clang does NOT call
> dsymutil for our case.
>
> Note that we are compiling through a fairly complex UPC driver, part of
> Berkeley UPC toolset, and we get this warnings only if our back-end
> compiler is GCC from our GNU UPC branch (which is in sync with the
> trunk). Using Clang as back-end compiler does not produce warning as
> they do not run the tool at the and - linking phase.
OK so it appears that we do have two issues;
1. that we're (incorrectly) calling dsymutil for "link only" cases where
there's no LTO involved (and that seems to be a typo in the argument to
post_ld_pass() on line 820). We located the PR that gave rise to the change
(61352) and will just double-check that we do not regress that with the change.
Could you make the change locally and see if it makes the problem "go away"?
(I note that it doesn't in any way fix #2).
2. Some as yet unexplained issue with new dsymutil
it's probable that if you can do something like:
clang a.o b.o .... z.o -g -o t
dsymutil t
and get errors - then the right thing is to file a radar (since that's really
only using ld64 and dsymutil - which are both outside the GCC source base).
It's possible that there's some fault with symbols in the object files that
doesn't somehow affect linking and doesn't trip up nm .. but adversely affects
dsymutil - not sure I can exactly envision that right now.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503774-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 23:37:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503774-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76456 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 23:37:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76427 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 23:37:41 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68525] New: bogus use of deleted function error on a template with a flexible array member
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02701.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1682
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68525
Bug ID: 68525
Summary: bogus use of deleted function error on a template with
a flexible array member
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Recent trunk gets confused by the program below into issuing a rather
mysterious error. Both Clang and Gcc 5.1 compile the code without an error.
$ cat z.cpp && /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc -Wall
-Wextra -Wpedantic -O2 -S -o/dev/tty -xc++ z.cpp
template <class T>
struct A {
int n;
T a[];
};
struct B { B (int); };
A<B> ab;
.file "z.cpp"
z.cpp:4:9: warning: ISO C++ forbids zero-size array ‘a’ [-Wpedantic]
T a[];
^
z.cpp:9:6: error: use of deleted function ‘A<B>::A()’
A<B> ab;
^~
z.cpp:2:8: note: ‘A<B>::A()’ is implicitly deleted because the default
definition would be ill-formed:
struct A {
^
z.cpp:2:8: error: no matching function for call to ‘B::B()’
z.cpp:7:12: note: candidate: B::B(int)
struct B { B (int); };
^
z.cpp:7:12: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 provided
z.cpp:7:8: note: candidate: constexpr B::B(const B&)
struct B { B (int); };
^
z.cpp:7:8: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 provided
z.cpp:7:8: note: candidate: constexpr B::B(B&&)
z.cpp:7:8: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 provided
>From gcc-bugs-return-503775-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 24 23:52:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503775-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36413 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2015 23:52:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36346 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2015 23:52:26 -0000
From: "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68526] New: [6 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/recip-4.c fails starting with r230492
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget cf_gccbuild
Message-ID: <bug-68526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02702.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
Bug ID: 68526
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/recip-4.c fails
starting with r230492
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dje at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,
wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Subject testcase starts failing with stated revision, is now generating
separate sqrt/recip instructions instead of combined insn (along with ancillary
insns which also fail to match).
Before:
xvrsqrtedp 0,12
After:
xvsqrtdp 12,0
xvredp 0,12
>From gcc-bugs-return-503776-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 00:10:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503776-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61494 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 00:10:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61472 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 00:10:47 -0000
From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug inline-asm/61692] ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-61692-4-A32HILqsxn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02703.txt.bz2
Content-length: 470
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This test case isn't portable. If upped to 40 then it would be more portable.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503777-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 00:24:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503777-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82520 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 00:24:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68604 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 00:24:27 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] New: ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02704.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2488
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Bug ID: 68527
Summary: ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Recent trunk (but not 5.1) crashes while compiling the invalid program below
(derived from g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-union6.C with the -fdump-ada-spec option.
$ cat x.cpp && /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc -Wall
-Wextra -Wpedantic -fdump-ada-spec -std=c++11 -xc++ z.cpp
struct S {
S s[1];
};
z.cpp:4:18: error: field ‘s’ has incomplete type ‘S [1]’
S s[1] = { 0 };
^
z.cpp:3:8: note: definition of ‘struct S’ is not complete until the closing
brace
struct S {
^
z.cpp:5:2: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have
‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in dump_nested_types, at c-family/c-ada-spec.c:2467
};
^
0x131c5d6 tree_class_check_failed(tree_node const*, tree_code_class, char
const*, int, char const*)
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/tree.c:9657
0x72a567 tree_class_check(tree_node*, tree_code_class, char const*, int, char
const*)
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/tree.h:3115
0xa86977 dump_nested_types
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:2467
0xa88411 print_ada_declaration
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:2777
0xa80b4c print_generic_ada_decl
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:735
0xa808ce dump_ada_nodes
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:667
0xa8ab2a dump_ads
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:3389
0xa8acf4 dump_ada_specs(void (*)(char const*), int (*)(tree_node*,
cpp_operation))
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:3457
0x86c424 c_parse_final_cleanups()
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4539
0xa6fb0b c_common_parse_file()
/home/msebor/scm/fsf/gcc-svn/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1091
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503778-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 00:34:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503778-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84723 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 00:34:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84670 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 00:34:33 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68449] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on atomic_load in C++
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-68449-4-AcQwYmtIMm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68449-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68449-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02705.txt.bz2
Content-length: 420
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 5.1 also crashes so this is not a regression.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503779-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 00:48:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503779-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109039 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 00:48:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108957 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 00:48:18 -0000
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-nLB7CsJnxa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02706.txt.bz2
Content-length: 739
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #29)
> These slides show how to reach 90% of peak:
> http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/
> the code actually is not too ugly, and I think there is no need for the
> explicit vector intrinsics with gcc.
The 90% of peak is achieved using SSE registers. I went ahead and built the
example and on my laptop (the slow machine) I get about 4.8 gflops with a
single core. So we could use this example and back-off from the SSE
optimizations to get an internal MATMUL that is not architecture dependent and
perhaps leave the rest to external optimized BLAS.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503780-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 01:07:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503780-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68409 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 01:07:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68294 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 01:07:34 -0000
From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 01:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-LIScVpNMs7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02707.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1475
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #12 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
1. there's a (linux) kernel-hardening effort of late that among others will try
to upstream the PaX gcc plugin infrastructure along with some plugins, so the
checker one could be added to that list (but it wasn't part of the initial
plan). you should probably continue this thread on that list instead as i doubt
many kernel devs follow the gcc bugzilla ;).
2. as for my idea, it's simple: track the context via an artificially injected
local integer variable (one per context if you want context sensitivity) and
initialize it to the 'in' attr parameter or 0 otherwise then adjust its value
on function calls that affect it based on the callee's context attribute. at
the end compare the variable against the 'out' attr parameter (or 0) and
complain on a mismatch (in my proof-of-concept i just called builtin_trap on a
mismatch). now where gcc comes in is that it'll do constant propagation, DCE,
etc for free so the final check either gets removed by dead code elimination
(the locking is correct) or we detected a locking problem and can even
determine the bad path(s). using this simple method on Josh's test file
there're no false positives or false negatives. i'll work it into something
usable (actual reports instead of having to check for leftover builtin_traps)
and release it in PaX then linux can pick it up when the time comes.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 01:17:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105480 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 01:17:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105439 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 01:16:56 -0000
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68456] UINT32_TYPE has different type for i586-elf and for i586-unknown-linux
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 01:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68456-4-JPVYw89bLN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68456-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68456-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02708.txt.bz2
Content-length: 693
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, vaalfreja at gmail dot com wrote:
> And why newlib-stdint header is used in this case? I haven't used any
> newlib-related options in configure. These targets still have different types
> for UINT32_TYPE.
Bare-metal targets such as i586-elf are presumed to use newlib. If you
require something incompatible with newlib's choice of types, you'll need
a separate GCC configuration using a different choice of these types (or
replace GCC's <stdint.h> wrapper, though that won't affect built-in uses
of the types).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503782-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 02:17:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503782-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25549 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 02:17:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25479 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 02:17:04 -0000
From: "jvg1981 at aim dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66573] Unexpected change in static, branch-prediction cost from O1 to O2 in if-then-else.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvg1981 at aim dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66573-4-kEVS7YZbNZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02709.txt.bz2
Content-length: 630
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573
--- Comment #11 from Joshua Green <jvg1981 at aim dot com> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #10)
> GCC thinks bar2 will be executed more often that bar1; the code
> it generates is perfectly fine for that.
>
> If you think GCC's heuristics for branch prediction are no good,
> could use some improvement, you'll have to come up with more
> evidence than just a single artificial testcase. Sorry. These
> things were tuned on real code.
If gcc's heuristic is indeed optimal when tested over a reasonable sample of
real code, then I withdraw my objection.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503783-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 02:42:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503783-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41343 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 02:42:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41312 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 02:42:41 -0000
From: "ishiura-compiler at ml dot kwansei.ac.jp" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68528] New: Wrong constant folding
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ishiura-compiler at ml dot kwansei.ac.jp
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02710.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1191
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528
Bug ID: 68528
Summary: Wrong constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ishiura-compiler at ml dot kwansei.ac.jp
Target Milestone: ---
GCC-6.0 for x86_64 miscompiles the following code.
$ cat test.c
#define INT_MIN ( -2147483647 - 1 )
int main (void)
{
int x0 = INT_MIN;
long x1 = 0L;
int x2 = 0;
int t = ( 0 || ( INT_MIN - (int) ( x0 - x1 ) ) );
if ( t != 0 ) { x2 = t; __builtin_abort(); }
return 0;
}
$ gcc-6.0 test.c -O2
$ ./a.out
zsh: abort ./a.out
$ gcc-6.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-6.0
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/ishiuraken/opt/gcc-6.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/ishiuraken/opt/gcc-6.0
--program-suffix=-6.0 --enable-laungages=c --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151112 (experimental) (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503784-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 03:02:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503784-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50581 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 03:02:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50555 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 03:02:25 -0000
From: "majun4950646 at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] New: scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02711.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1934
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
Bug ID: 68529
Summary: scev failed for while(i--)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
Target Milestone: ---
loop distribution failed to generate memset library call for the following
example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(){
char c[10000]={};
unsigned int nchar=9999;
while(nchar--!=0)
{
c[nchar]='A';
}
printf("%s\n",c);
return 0;
}
Compiled with
gcc -O3 -march=core2 -fdump-tree-ldist-details t.c -o t
From the ldist dump:
...
Creating dr for c[nchar_24]
analyze_innermost: failed: evolution of offset is not affine.
base_address:
offset from base address:
constant offset from base address:
step:
aligned to:
base_object: c
Access function 0: {9998, +, 4294967295}_1
...
and it failed to transform the while loop to memset
=====
However, it successed by change while(nchar--!=0) to for(;nchar !=0;nchar--):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(){
char c[10000]={};
unsigned int nchar=9999;
for(;nchar!=0;nchar--)
{
c[nchar]='A';
}
printf("%s\n",c);
return 0;
}
...
Creating dr for c[nchar_21]
analyze_innermost: success.
base_address: &c
offset from base address: 0
constant offset from base address: 9999
step: -1
aligned to: 128
base_object: c
Access function 0: {9999, +, 4294967295}_1
...
and generate memset library call stmt:
__builtin_memset (&MEM[(void *)&c + 1B], 65, 9999);
I also testd in gcc4.8.4 and trunk, both failed.
--Jun
>From gcc-bugs-return-503785-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 03:26:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503785-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26799 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 03:26:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26475 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 03:26:46 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/67106] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED. with -g -fpack-struct
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67106-4-C8j8k4rbkd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02712.txt.bz2
Content-length: 604
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67106
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with today's top of trunk (version 6.0.0 20151125).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503786-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 03:32:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503786-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31794 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 03:32:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31584 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 03:32:43 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68474] [6 Regression] ICE: in get_no_error_domain, at tree-call-cdce.c:699 with -funsafe-math-optimizations
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68474-4-GacC9FtjNr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02713.txt.bz2
Content-length: 589
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68474
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with today's trunk (6.0.0 20151125).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503787-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 03:42:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503787-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50752 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 03:42:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50698 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 03:42:16 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67778-4-dCQjBWhufU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02714.txt.bz2
Content-length: 790
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can't reproduce this error with today's trunk (6.0.0 20151125) on x86_64. I
see a similar stack trace in bug 60598 but that was fixed over a year ago. Can
you confirm that trunk compiles the test case as expected in your environment?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503788-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 03:45:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503788-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54288 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 03:45:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53577 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 03:45:20 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66131] [6 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 03:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66131-4-eLZ5CnsBdP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02715.txt.bz2
Content-length: 584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66131
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I also cannot reproduce the failure with today's trunk (6.0.0 20151125).
Resolving as fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503789-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 04:20:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503789-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28670 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 04:20:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28637 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 04:20:28 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68387] [c++1z] gcc hangs forever on this code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68387-4-P7iGEA4gj9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68387-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68387-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02716.txt.bz2
Content-length: 572
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68387
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with today's trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503790-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 04:24:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503790-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51297 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 04:24:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51235 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 04:24:24 -0000
From: "timshen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68450] regex matching different from ECMAScript?
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68450-4-IKEpFyzY2x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02717.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1089
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68450
Tim Shen <timshen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Tim Shen <timshen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think I unintentionally fixed this problem in my refactoring branch:
https://github.com/innocentim/gcc/commits/master
I ran this branch and get the result:
"Field": "Value"
"Field": "Value"
Each line has two trailing spaces, which is the same as my boost output.
I'm not sure when this branch may get reviewed checked in (it involves a lot of
changes), but I personally hope it's before the next big release.
Alternatively I can find the commit that fixes this issue, cherry pick it to
the trunk, and rebase my branch; but I know that rebasing is gonna be super
painful, so I'd rather wait for a while.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503791-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 04:37:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503791-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12411 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 04:37:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12272 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 04:37:02 -0000
From: "luser.droog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luser.droog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-nE0yq2TDBa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02718.txt.bz2
Content-length: 502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #9 from M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog at gmail dot com> ---
Investigated the offending source line a little deeper. It now looks to me like
it has to do with mixed floating/integer arithmetic, especially with bizarre
types like `time_t`. Changing the source to use all integer arithmetic allows
the compiler to complete.
gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
_xpost_start_time = (((long)tv.tv_sec) * 1000) + ((long)tv.tv_usec / 1000);
>From gcc-bugs-return-503792-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 04:41:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503792-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17114 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 04:41:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17066 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 04:41:32 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-46QVuzDAA5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02719.txt.bz2
Content-length: 180
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This sounds related to GMP/MPFR, can you recompile those?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503793-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 04:52:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503793-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36530 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 04:52:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36495 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 04:52:48 -0000
From: "lucdanton at free dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68530] New: [C++14] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lucdanton at free dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68530-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02720.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1789
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68530
Bug ID: 68530
Summary: [C++14] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind
loop_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lucdanton at free dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
Possibly related to PR c++/68206, which could also be exhibiting both this and
a potentially unrelated ICE.
$ g++-trunk --version
g++-trunk (GCC) 6.0.0 20151125 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
$ cat main.cpp
struct thing {
void foo() {}
};
template<typename>
constexpr int count()
{
auto item = thing {};
for(; (item.foo(), false););
return 0;
}
int main()
{
static_assert( count<int>() == 0, "" );
}
$ g++-trunk -std=c++14 main.cpp
main.cpp: In function 'int main()':
main.cpp:15:5: error: non-constant condition for static assertion
static_assert( count<int>() == 0, "" );
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
main.cpp:15:30: error: 'constexpr int count() [with <template-parameter-1-1> =
int]' called in a constant expression
static_assert( count<int>() == 0, "" );
^
main.cpp:6:15: note: 'constexpr int count() [with <template-parameter-1-1> =
int]' is not usable as a constexpr function because:
constexpr int count()
^~~~~
main.cpp:6:15: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr
main.cpp:6: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
>From gcc-bugs-return-503794-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:00:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503794-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104821 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:00:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104642 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 04:59:59 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/67755] [5 Regression] Bad edge probability/block freqency for tree jump threading
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67755-4-nCA2M1fMsO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02721.txt.bz2
Content-length: 490
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is caused by r215739, "Redesign jump threading profile updates
to avoid introducing insanities".
>From gcc-bugs-return-503795-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:09:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503795-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113836 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:09:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113783 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 05:09:42 -0000
From: "lcoquelle at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68450] regex matching different from ECMAScript?
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: lcoquelle at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68450-4-7T6Qkov62n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02722.txt.bz2
Content-length: 849
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68450
--- Comment #2 from Ludo <lcoquelle at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Tim Shen from comment #1)
> I think I unintentionally fixed this problem in my refactoring branch:
> https://github.com/innocentim/gcc/commits/master
>
> I ran this branch and get the result:
> "Field": "Value"
> "Field": "Value"
>
> Each line has two trailing spaces, which is the same as my boost output.
>
> I'm not sure when this branch may get reviewed checked in (it involves a lot
> of changes), but I personally hope it's before the next big release.
>
> Alternatively I can find the commit that fixes this issue, cherry pick it to
> the trunk, and rebase my branch; but I know that rebasing is gonna be super
> painful, so I'd rather wait for a while.
Nice! thanks for looking at it!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503796-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:18:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503796-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128108 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:18:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128063 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 05:18:33 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68531] New: incorrect code for VLA in C++
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02723.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1448
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68531
Bug ID: 68531
Summary: incorrect code for VLA in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
G++ accepts variable length arrays as an extension but generates the wrong code
for some basic uses cases of such arrays: it allows changes in the value of a
variable that determines the number of elements in a VLA type to affect the
bound of the VLA after it has been defined.
When compiled with gcc (in C mode), or by Clang in either C or C++ modes, the
following program compiles and runs successfully to completion. However, when
compiled with g++, either today's trunk or as far back as 4.5.3 (the oldest I
tested), it aborts.
$ cat x.c && /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc -Wall
-Wextra -Wpedantic -xc++ x.c && ./a.out
int main ()
{
int nelems = 7;
typedef char A [nelems];
nelems = 2;
A a;
if (sizeof (A) != 7 || sizeof a != 7) __builtin_abort ();
}
x.c: In function ‘int main()’:
x.c:5:27: warning: ISO C++ forbids variable length array ‘A’ [-Wvla]
typedef char A [nelems];
^
Aborted (core dumped)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503797-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:21:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503797-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130328 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:20:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129795 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 05:19:57 -0000
From: "luser.droog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luser.droog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-WlPBQVD2Ul@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02724.txt.bz2
Content-length: 788
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #11 from M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 36831
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36831&action=edit
additional source triggering same error
Having successfully compiled the other file, I have received the same error on
a different file. Again it appears to involve mixing floating-point types.
CC src/lib/src_lib_libxpost_la-xpost_op_math.lo
src/lib/xpost_op_math.c: In function ‘Ratan’:
src/lib/xpost_op_math.c:341:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
real ang = atan2((num.real_.val * RAD_PER_DEG),
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
`real` is a typedef for float.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503798-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:28:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503798-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44397 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:28:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44322 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 05:28:43 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68196] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68196-4-tWLD6r6pzI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02725.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1510
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 25 05:28:10 2015
New Revision: 230852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* class.c (has_finalizer_component): Prevent infinite recursion
through this function if the derived type and that of its
component are the same.
* trans-types.c (gfc_get_derived_type): Do the same for proc
pointers by ignoring the explicit interface for the component.
PR fortran/66465
* check.c (same_type_check): If either of the expressions is
BT_PROCEDURE, use the typespec from the symbol, rather than the
expression.
2015-11-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90: New test.
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/66465
* gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/check.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/class.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503799-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:28:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503799-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44405 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:28:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44325 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 05:28:43 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66465] Procedure pointer component & non-component interpreted as different type or kind
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66465-4-QawuDKv2cU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02726.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1510
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 25 05:28:10 2015
New Revision: 230852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* class.c (has_finalizer_component): Prevent infinite recursion
through this function if the derived type and that of its
component are the same.
* trans-types.c (gfc_get_derived_type): Do the same for proc
pointers by ignoring the explicit interface for the component.
PR fortran/66465
* check.c (same_type_check): If either of the expressions is
BT_PROCEDURE, use the typespec from the symbol, rather than the
expression.
2015-11-25 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/68196
* gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90: New test.
Backport from trunk.
PR fortran/66465
* gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr66465.f90
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_47.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/check.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/class.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503800-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:39:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503800-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57240 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:39:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55791 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 05:37:39 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66465] Procedure pointer component & non-component interpreted as different type or kind
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66465-4-gSFVf2tQmP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02727.txt.bz2
Content-length: 547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on 4.9, 5 and 6 branches.
Thanks for the report
Paul
>From gcc-bugs-return-503801-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:39:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503801-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57829 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 05:39:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55506 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 05:36:58 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68196] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68196-4-izGkYLua9h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68196-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02728.txt.bz2
Content-length: 473
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on 4.9, 5 and 6 branches.
Thanks for the report
Paul
>From gcc-bugs-return-503802-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 06:56:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503802-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70455 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 06:56:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70368 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 06:56:36 -0000
From: "michael.collison at linaro dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68494] [ARM] Use vector multiply by lane
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 06:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: michael.collison at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68494-4-HUNkucu53C@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02729.txt.bz2
Content-length: 733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68494
--- Comment #2 from Michael Collison <michael.collison at linaro dot org> ---
Sorry here is the updated test case.
#define NTAPS 4
short taps[NTAPS];
void fir_t5(int len, short * __restrict p, short *__restrict x, short
*__restrict taps)
{
len = len & ~31;
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
int tmp = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < NTAPS; j++)
{
tmp += x[i - j] * taps[j];
}
p[i] = tmp;
}
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We currently generate a vdup of the scalar taps[j] in the inner loop. Ideally
we do not use the vdup and insted use a vmul using a lane.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503803-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 07:11:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503803-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119852 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 07:11:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119832 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 07:11:18 -0000
From: "michael.collison at linaro dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68532] New: [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: michael.collison at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68532-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02730.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1060
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532
Bug ID: 68532
Summary: [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: michael.collison at linaro dot org
Target Milestone: ---
The following test case produces the incorrect answer on arm big endian with
the following options: -O2 -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model
-mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon
Result should be '960', armbe generate '992' as the result.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdalign.h>
#define SIZE 128
unsigned short alignas(16) in[SIZE];
__attribute__ ((noinline)) int
test (unsigned short diff, unsigned short *in, int x)
{
for (int j = 0; j < SIZE; j+=8)
diff += in[j] * x;
return diff;
}
int main()
{
for (int i = 0; i<SIZE; i++) in[i] = i;
printf("%d\n", test(0, in, 1));
return 0;
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503804-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 07:27:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503804-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49586 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 07:27:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49520 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 07:27:14 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-SOPolE0Nyl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02731.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2185
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #13 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to PaX Team from comment #12)
> 2. as for my idea, it's simple: track the context via an artificially
> injected local integer variable (one per context if you want context
> sensitivity) and initialize it to the 'in' attr parameter or 0 otherwise
> then adjust its value on function calls that affect it based on the callee's
> context attribute. at the end compare the variable against the 'out' attr
> parameter (or 0) and complain on a mismatch (in my proof-of-concept i just
> called builtin_trap on a mismatch). now where gcc comes in is that it'll do
> constant propagation, DCE, etc for free so the final check either gets
> removed by dead code elimination (the locking is correct) or we detected a
> locking problem and can even determine the bad path(s). using this simple
> method on Josh's test file there're no false positives or false negatives.
> i'll work it into something usable (actual reports instead of having to
> check for leftover builtin_traps) and release it in PaX then linux can pick
> it up when the time comes.
That sounds really plausible to me. GCC's constant propagation seems likely to
do *at least* as well as Sparse does, if not better. (As long as you have
optimizations turned on, anyway.)
Note that in addition to complaining if *any* exit to the function doesn't have
the correct "out" value, you also need to complain if calls to functions with
the context attribute don't have the necessary "in" value. You may want to
make that a separate warning option, though, as that option tends to force
adding annotations to far more functions.
This approach won't necessarily provide the "different contexts for basic
block" warning that Sparse has, but I don't necessarily think we need that; we
only care about running a block with different locks if that block actually
wants a lock. (Some prototypes in Sparse once provided a separate attribute
for use on structure fields, that specified the lock you have to hold to touch
that field; that could act as another assertion on the context.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503805-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:04:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503805-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66755 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:04:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66602 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 08:04:41 -0000
From: "gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug inline-asm/61692] ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61692-4-ZK2IqsDTi5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02732.txt.bz2
Content-length: 548
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #4 from David <gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com> ---
(In reply to mrs@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> This test case isn't portable. If upped to 40 then it would be more
> portable.
What platform supports more than 30 operands?
As near as I can see, MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS always resolves to 30. Testing the
difference between 30 and 31 is the edge case.
So yeah, we could also try 40, but that seems like an arbitrary number. Why
not 50? 150?
What am I missing here?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503806-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:04:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503806-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67542 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:04:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67449 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 08:04:53 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/65874] [5 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure (gcc/ira.o) on ia64-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-65874-4-D9nB7jR3Y6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65874-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65874-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02733.txt.bz2
Content-length: 447
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Not reproducible.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503807-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:37:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503807-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128501 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:37:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128007 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 08:37:44 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67438] [6 Regression] ~X op ~Y pattern relocation causes loop performance degradation on 32bit x86
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67438-4-0QM6u5J5bx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02734.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2894
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #11)
> In fact, the problem is quite different although it is caused by
> non-profitable pattern matching ~X CMP ~Y -> Y CMP X. In general this
> pattern may be helpful if we can delete not operation, e.g.
> x1 = ~x;
> y1 = ~y;
> if (x1 <cmp> y1) ... and there no any other uses of x1 and y1, i.e. x1 and
> y1 have single use. But if this is not truth we will increase register
> pressure since we can not use the same register for x,x1 and y,y1.
>
> Richard proposed to use the same simplification for min/max operations but
> in original test-case nested min/max operation (min(x,min(y,z)) or multi
> operand min/max (min(x,y,z)) are not recognized by gcc (Note that icc does
> such transformation)
Can you file an enhancement bug for this? Best with a testcase. AFAICS
a full solution will have pieces in phi-opt and reassoc at least.
> and so this won't help since we have the same register
> pressure issue:
> c = ~r;
> m = ~g;
> y = ~b;
> k = min(c, m, y);
> *out++ = c - k;
> *out++ = m - k;
> *out++ = y - k;
> *out++ = k;
> and we can see that value of 'c' is used in min computation and resulting
> store, so if we will use r <cmp> g comparison we will increase live range
> for r, g, b variables and additional registers will require for them (till
> comparison).
> Note also that there exists another issue with path-splitting (aka tail
> duplication) which duplicate loop back edge and in fact move tail block to
> hammock. This transformation does not loop useful (at least at given stage
> of design) but this is another topic for discussion.
>
> I'd like to propose to introduce new predicate for pattern matching which
> tells us how much uses have left-hand side of ~x.
There are examples in match.pd that use single_use () in conditions, doing
that would fix this issue.
Note that generally constraining patterns to "single-use" operands misses
the case where applying (the same) pattern(s) at multiple locations may
effectively make operands "single-use". Currently match.pd patterns
are applied one-by-one (without fully cleaning up dead stmts) in
tree-ssa-forwprop.c which will miss opportunities because of this. Thus
there is no "global" analysis done to determine whether an operand becomes
dead after applying (multiple) pattern(s) (which is the point of single-use
checks).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503808-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:47:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503808-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49810 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:47:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49753 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 08:47:06 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68502] [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68502-4-wmVu3S6dy0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02735.txt.bz2
Content-length: 782
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 25 08:46:34 2015
New Revision: 230854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68502
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_group_access_1): Restore
check that the step is a multiple of the type size.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr68502-1.c: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr68502-2.c: Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68502-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68502-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503809-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:53:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503809-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66381 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:53:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66336 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 08:53:55 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-Y3bbDrkLK2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02736.txt.bz2
Content-length: 532
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 25 08:53:22 2015
New Revision: 230855
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230855&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68492
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_build_slp_tree): Consistently build up
op from scalars after operand swapping.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503810-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:56:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503810-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75762 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:56:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74878 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 08:56:54 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68525] [6 Regression] bogus use of deleted function error on a template with a flexible array member
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68525-4-21ICf6JTHT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02737.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68525
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503811-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:59:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503811-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81259 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:59:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80356 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 08:59:07 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67089] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Integer overflow checks not optimized on x86/x86_64
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67089-4-GPE4WulrJv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02738.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1158
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 25 08:58:32 2015
New Revision: 230856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/67089
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (uaddsub_overflow_check_p,
match_uaddsub_overflow): New functions.
(pass_optimize_widening_mul::execute): Call match_uaddsub_overflow.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-2.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-3.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-4.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-5.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-6.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr67089-7.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-3.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-4.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-5.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-6.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr67089-7.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503812-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 08:59:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503812-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104728 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 08:59:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101510 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 08:59:36 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68530] [C++14] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 08:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68530-4-OmSVwxZa6Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68530-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68530-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02739.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68530
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503813-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:00:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503813-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106156 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:00:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106088 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:00:39 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68206] ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68206-4-Zdf4hWnGF7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02740.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68206
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503814-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:02:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503814-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61171 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:02:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55040 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:01:58 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68533] New: bogus location for "warning:=?UTF-8?Q? ‘struct s3’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration?="
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68533-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02741.txt.bz2
Content-length: 889
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Bug ID: 68533
Summary: bogus location for "warning: ‘struct s3’ declared
inside parameter list will not be visible outside of
this definition or declaration"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
> ./cc1 -quiet t.c -O3 -fdump-tree-slp-details
t.c:18:29: warning: ‘struct s3’ declared inside parameter list will not be
visible outside of this definition or declaration
foo (struct s3 *arg, struct s4 *arg1)
^~
for the testcase in PR68517
>From gcc-bugs-return-503816-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:08:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503816-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94863 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:08:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93402 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:08:39 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68188] Ambiguous code gets compiled successfully when class and its namespace have the same name
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68188-4-Q6mzvivzl3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68188-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68188-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02743.txt.bz2
Content-length: 188
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68188
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
*** Bug 60025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503815-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:08:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503815-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94850 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:08:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93362 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:08:38 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60025] Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-60025-4-moWhpv02vg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60025-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60025-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02742.txt.bz2
Content-length: 501
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60025
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68188 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503817-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:10:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503817-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101294 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:10:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101251 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:10:29 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68180] [ICE] at cp/constexpr.c:2768 in initializing __vector in a loop
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68180-4-Nu1395Y0V6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68180-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02744.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68180
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503818-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:15:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503818-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123062 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:15:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122998 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:15:07 -0000
From: "jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-6IbXylUv4S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02745.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1643
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #15)
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:48:19PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
> >
> > --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > > Not sure how the gcc/testsuite got on the end. Oh well, the
> > > testcase won't hurt anything.
> >
> > [Book15] f90/bug% gfca /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90
> > /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90:21:0:
> >
> > forall (i=1:n) y(i)%a = x
> >
> >
> > internal compiler error: in gfc_do_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:3130
> >
> > without your fix for pr68227.
> >
>
> Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything.
> FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The
> issue with EXPR_FUNCTION and cshift is a problem.
The hurt is for those of us investigating the new regressions... That was 10
minutes of my time to investigate, multiply that by the number of people
watching for FAILs on their favourite targets (particularly with trunk as it is
at the end of stage 1) there is certainly enough hurt to go round.
Please revert the broken testcase and leave it for when you fix pr68227.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503820-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:16:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503820-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126632 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:16:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126583 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:16:29 -0000
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68535] New: arm.c: 5 * set but not used
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68535-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02747.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1241
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68535
Bug ID: 68535
Summary: arm.c: 5 * set but not used
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
1.
[trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:14167]: (style) Variable 'base_reg' is assigned a
value that is never used.
Possible candidate for deletion.
2.
[trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:14723]: (style) Variable 'i' is assigned a value
that is never used.
Strange looking for loop. Maybe rewrite it ?
3.
[trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:21716]: (style) Variable 'insn' is assigned a value
that is never used.
Not sure if the instruction should be used someplace later.
4.
[trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:23772]: (style) Variable 'pushed_words' is assigned
a value that is never used.
Candidate for deletion.
5.
[trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:24059]: (style) Variable 'regs_to_pop' is assigned
a value that is never used.
The code that uses the variable is in a comment. Suggest either reinstate
the commented out code or remove the variable.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503819-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:16:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503819-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125735 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:16:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125677 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:16:02 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68534] New: No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68534-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02746.txt.bz2
Content-length: 842
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534
Bug ID: 68534
Summary: No error on mismatch in number of arguments between
submodule and module interface
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As reported by FortranFan on clf, the following does not produce an error:
module m
implicit none
interface
module subroutine foo()
end subroutine foo
end interface
end module m
submodule(m) sm
contains
module subroutine foo(i)
integer, intent(inout) :: i
i = 42
return
end subroutine foo
end submodule sm
Paul
>From gcc-bugs-return-503821-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:17:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503821-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127500 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:17:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127456 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:17:04 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4-xdC8VQ9BSV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02748.txt.bz2
Content-length: 803
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, mine. This happens because get_inner_reference converts nchar_14
to sizetype and thus we analyze the evolution of (uint64_t) nchar_14 which
isn't affine unless we can prove nchar_14 will never wrap in its type (unsigned
int).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503822-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:18:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503822-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128834 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:18:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128769 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:18:11 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68534] No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68534-4-YjDWlNoRRZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68534-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68534-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02749.txt.bz2
Content-length: 873
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |damian at sourceryinstitute dot or
| |g,
| |kargl at apl dot washington.edu,
| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed on FC21/x86_64
Paul
>From gcc-bugs-return-503824-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:19:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503824-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130216 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:19:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130073 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:19:34 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/65091] decltype(~arg) fails for template functions
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-65091-4-1rcL5WvT69@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02751.txt.bz2
Content-length: 454
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65091
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joel.falcou at lri dot fr
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
*** Bug 68144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503823-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:19:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503823-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130116 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:19:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130047 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:19:33 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68144] operator~ in trailing return type leads to spurrious error
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68144-4-JQGJUJcrZ0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68144-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68144-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02750.txt.bz2
Content-length: 501
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68144
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65091 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503825-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:21:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503825-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13625 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:21:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13587 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:21:41 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68096] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault(program cc1plus)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-68096-4-Co2I4h2Qn8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68096-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68096-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02752.txt.bz2
Content-length: 506
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68096
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Severity|critical |normal
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Let's close this.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503826-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:22:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503826-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14384 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:22:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14337 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:22:00 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68528] Wrong constant folding
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68528-4-krpBnG5ejF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02753.txt.bz2
Content-length: 613
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.3.5, 4.8.5, 5.2.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503827-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:22:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503827-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15183 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:22:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15140 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:22:28 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68161] Inconsistent behaviour of unnamed field with inheritance.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-68161-4-CS7cq1JIay@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68161-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02754.txt.bz2
Content-length: 305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68161
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
>From gcc-bugs-return-503830-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:23:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503830-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18508 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18431 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:31 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68502] [6 Regression][i686] spec2000/179.art runfails after r222914
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68502-4-FzE2EuRfHx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02757.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68502
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503829-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:23:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503829-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17750 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17367 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:19 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68517-4-zczytDmoxK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02756.txt.bz2
Content-length: 668
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 25 09:22:47 2015
New Revision: 230858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68517
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses):
Properly handle zero-sized types.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr68517.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr68517.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503828-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:23:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503828-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16995 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16935 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:12 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68517] [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vect-data-refs.c:2751
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68517-4-KgLobWfpLx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68517-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02755.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503831-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:23:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503831-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19366 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19289 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:23:49 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68526] [6 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/recip-4.c fails starting with r230492
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68526-4-Q1yPDY9pVf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02758.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503832-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:26:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503832-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23214 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:26:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23173 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:26:01 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68522] [6 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 435.gromacs miscomparison
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68522-4-5VlyTk90Fv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02759.txt.bz2
Content-length: 353
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68522
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503833-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:28:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503833-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26226 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:28:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26142 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:28:44 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68521-4-Plp32xp1Ps@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02760.txt.bz2
Content-length: 463
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36832
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36832&action=edit
unrelated(?) patch
Yeah, note that tree-complex.c is structured in a way that exposes SSA name
uses without actually having built the defs...
I've run into this for some unrelated work (not finished) and produced the
attached to fix that.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503834-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:30:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503834-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32446 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:30:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32293 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:30:45 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68521-4-l4GnhVlf7e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02761.txt.bz2
Content-length: 236
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I get some (unrelated) ICE in my heavily patched dev tree with that patch so
cannot verify it does anything good.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503835-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:31:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503835-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33361 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:31:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33317 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:31:18 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68521-4-dg8J4ZV0RG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02762.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503836-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:33:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503836-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39365 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:33:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39253 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:33:02 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67983] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67983-4-SFDUnw47Tv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02763.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67983
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503837-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:36:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503837-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46233 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:36:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46166 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:36:03 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68521] [6.0 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68521-4-q3eCUUHOYk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02764.txt.bz2
Content-length: 398
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68521
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I get some (unrelated) ICE in my heavily patched dev tree with that patch so
> cannot verify it does anything good.
Ah, it's the patch itself not working (domwalk being confused because the
pass splits blocks during the walk)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503838-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:49:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503838-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72586 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:49:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72509 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 09:49:03 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68435-4-mMccAcNgDf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02765.txt.bz2
Content-length: 662
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Nov 25 09:48:29 2015
New Revision: 230859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68435 Allow (c ? x++ : x--) form
PR rtl-optimization/68435
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_cmove_arith): Skip final insn when checking
for conflicts between a, b and the set destinations.
* gcc.dg/pr68435.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68435.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ifcvt.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503839-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:50:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503839-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76149 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:50:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76092 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:50:22 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68435-4-HFtSwH9Zd7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02766.txt.bz2
Content-length: 204
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The RTL if-conversion issue should be fixed now.
So now only the path-splitting problem remains?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503840-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:53:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503840-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78631 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:53:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78581 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:53:22 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68528] Wrong constant folding
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68528-4-J6keOJY6aM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02767.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2306
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
at -O0 we have in .original
int t = 1;
because when we fold INT_MIN - (int) ((unsigned int) x0 - (unsigned int) x1)
we go through
/* A - B -> A + (-B) if B is easily negatable. */
if (negate_expr_p (arg1)
&& !TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED (type)
&& ((FLOAT_TYPE_P (type)
/* Avoid this transformation if B is a positive REAL_CST. */
&& (TREE_CODE (arg1) != REAL_CST
|| REAL_VALUE_NEGATIVE (TREE_REAL_CST (arg1))))
|| INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)))
return fold_build2_loc (loc, PLUS_EXPR, type,
fold_convert_loc (loc, type, arg0),
fold_convert_loc (loc, type,
negate_expr (arg1)));
resulting in
(int) ((unsigned int) x1 - (unsigned int) x0) + -2147483648
after canonicalization which can never be zero (considering undefined overflow)
and we determine that from
/* Transform comparisons of the form X +- C1 CMP C2 to X CMP C2 -+ C1. */
if ((TREE_CODE (arg0) == PLUS_EXPR || TREE_CODE (arg0) == MINUS_EXPR)
&& (equality_code
|| (ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (TREE_TYPE (arg0))))
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)) == INTEGER_CST
&& !TREE_OVERFLOW (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1))
&& TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST
&& !TREE_OVERFLOW (arg1))
{
const enum tree_code
reverse_op = TREE_CODE (arg0) == PLUS_EXPR ? MINUS_EXPR : PLUS_EXPR;
tree const1 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1);
tree const2 = fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (const1), arg1);
tree variable = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0);
tree new_const = int_const_binop (reverse_op, const2, const1);
/* If the constant operation overflowed this can be
simplified as a comparison against INT_MAX/INT_MIN. */
if (TREE_OVERFLOW (new_const)
&& !TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (arg0)))
{
...
/* We now can look at the canonicalized case
VARIABLE + 1 CODE2 INT_MIN
and decide on the result. */
>From gcc-bugs-return-503841-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:53:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503841-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79569 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:53:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79517 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:53:49 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58910] std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58910-4-QMmU6TVVXc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02768.txt.bz2
Content-length: 211
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Indeed. Let's play safe and add a testcase before closing the bug as fixed for
5+.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503842-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 09:58:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503842-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105317 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 09:58:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104288 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 09:58:51 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68528] Wrong constant folding
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status component assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68528-4-gB55KV4z48@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02769.txt.bz2
Content-length: 779
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The bug is that we call negate_expr_p on arg1 instead of op1 which does not
preserve the sign of the operand properly. Unfortunately we do this in a lot
of places.
And again a TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED check was "wrong" (should have fixed
the bogus case properly).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503843-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:00:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503843-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109613 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:00:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109553 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 10:00:35 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58910] std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58910-4-SQap8k5kfT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02770.txt.bz2
Content-length: 502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 25 10:00:02 2015
New Revision: 230860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230860&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/58910
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-tuple2.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-tuple2.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503844-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:02:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503844-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111157 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:02:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111104 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:02:14 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58910] std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_known_to_work resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-58910-4-SwXab7xzQ9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58910-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02771.txt.bz2
Content-length: 549
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work| |5.1.0, 6.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Done.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503845-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:02:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503845-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111249 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:02:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111129 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:02:15 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-55004-4-b3vGka7skK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55004-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55004-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02772.txt.bz2
Content-length: 518
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58910, which changed state.
Bug 58910 Summary: std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical userdefined structs as template-args
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503846-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:04:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503846-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113396 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:04:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113355 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:04:21 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68492] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8266
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68492-4-plSRdSNpvj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02773.txt.bz2
Content-length: 430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68492
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503847-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:15:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503847-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15290 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:15:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15163 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:15:32 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68535] arm.c: 5 * set but not used
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68535-4-NZ1cEIO1Xv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68535-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68535-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02774.txt.bz2
Content-length: 582
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68535
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed, those cases do look weird and could use some cleanup
>From gcc-bugs-return-503848-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:22:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503848-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27731 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:22:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27327 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:22:25 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67824-4-BjdSnwo7jn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67824-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02775.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-503849-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:31:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503849-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80656 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:31:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80118 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:31:41 -0000
From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-vOqHyI3iMb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02776.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2387
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #14 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #13)
> That sounds really plausible to me. GCC's constant propagation seems likely
> to do *at least* as well as Sparse does, if not better. (As long as you
> have optimizations turned on, anyway.)
note that optimizations are not actually necessary for the scheme to work, it
just means that the check(s) will have to do more work as you'll get a phi and
have to traverse back the data flow to see if any unexpected values can end up
there (optimizations basically do this data flow tracking for free and result
in dead code elimination thus making it easier on the checks). in fact i expect
that this will already happen on real linux code so the plugin will have to
handle this case anyway.
> Note that in addition to complaining if *any* exit to the function doesn't
> have the correct "out" value, you also need to complain if calls to
> functions with the context attribute don't have the necessary "in" value.
sure, it's easy enough to inject more checks than just at the function return
sites, i just wanted to validate my idea first then do the make-it-usable part
which includes increased coverage too.
> You may want to make that a separate warning option, though, as that option
> tends to force adding annotations to far more functions.
actually one idea for the future is to extend the plugin to be IPA then LTO
aware so that it can discover the acquire/release properties itself based on an
initial set of 'seed' functions that have to be marked by hand (and which
already are i guess, all the direct callers of __context__ basically). we have
experience in this area with the size overflow and other plugins, so the
infrastructure is there already (albeit the LTO part is held up by PR61311).
> This approach won't necessarily provide the "different contexts for basic
> block" warning that Sparse has, but I don't necessarily think we need that;
can you give me an example of this? the thing is, my approach tracks the
context with statement granularity so if you can tell the compiler where you
expect specific states (such as the context attr on callees) checks can be
inserted there easily, down to individual statements (say, the structure field
accesses you mentioned).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503850-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:34:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503850-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83037 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:34:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82981 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:34:14 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] New: LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc blocked target_milestone cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02777.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2550
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
Bug ID: 68536
Summary: LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: vmakarov at redhat dot com
Blocks: 49526
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm
I'm trying to add support in arm for the smmlar instruction from ARMv6.
The pattern for it looks like this:
(define_insn "*mulsidi3siaddsi_round_v6"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
(plus:SI
(match_operator:SI 3 "subreg_highpart_operator"
[(plus:DI
(mult:DI
(sign_extend:DI
(match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "%r"))
(sign_extend:DI
(match_operand:SI 2 "s_register_operand" "r")))
(const_int 2147483648))])
(match_operand:SI 4 "s_register_operand" "r")))]
"TARGET_32BIT && arm_arch6"
"smmlar%?\\t%0, %1, %2, %4"
[(set_attr "type" "smmla")
(set_attr "predicable" "yes")
(set_attr "predicable_short_it" "no")]
)
However, if I add it to arm.md I get the following ICE during register
allocation:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
}
^
0xa9a432 crash_signal
$SRC/gcc/toplev.c:334
0x930f61 lra_emit_add(rtx_def*, rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
$SRC/gcc/lra.c:389
0x93130b lra_emit_move(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
$SRC/gcc/lra.c:495
0x939fc9 insert_move_for_subreg
$SRC/gcc/lra-constraints.c:1353
0x9416ce simplify_operand_subreg
$SRC/gcc/lra-constraints.c:1489
0x9416ce curr_insn_transform
$SRC/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3416
0x94437d lra_constraints(bool)
$SRC/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4406
0x933d75 lra(_IO_FILE*)
$SRC/gcc/lra.c:2267
0x8ef845 do_reload
$SRC/gcc/ira.c:5383
0x8ef845 execute
$SRC/gcc/ira.c:5554
Just add this pattern to gcc/config/arm.md and try to compile the testcase:
int
smmlar (int a, int b, int c)
{
return c + (((long long)a * b + 0x80000000) >> 32);
}
with -O2 and -mcpu=cortex-a15 or something
Is there something wrong with the way I defined the pattern/constraints
or is this an LRA bug?
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49526
[Bug 49526] extra move instruction for smmul
>From gcc-bugs-return-503851-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 10:55:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503851-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58293 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 10:55:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58217 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 10:55:34 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68537] New: Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_file_loc bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02778.txt.bz2
Content-length: 5857
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
Bug ID: 68537
Summary: Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with
-O3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19289
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36833
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36833&action=edit
unreduced testcase
Since r230091 gcc apparently miscompiles the glibc dynmanic linker when using
-O3:
markus@x4 glibc-build % gdb --args
/var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /home/markus/bin/xmonad
Reading symbols from /var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /var/tmp/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
/home/markus/bin/xmonad
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
_dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff75cb3c5 "__gmpn_invert_limb",
undef_map=0x7ffff76494d0, ref=ref@entry=0x7fffffffa170,
symbol_scope=0x7ffff7649828, version=0x0,
type_class=type_class@entry=1, flags=1, skip_map=0x0) at dl-lookup.c:809
809 struct sym_val current_value = { NULL, NULL };
(gdb) bt
#0 _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff75cb3c5 "__gmpn_invert_limb",
undef_map=0x7ffff76494d0, ref=ref@entry=0x7fffffffa170,
symbol_scope=0x7ffff7649828, version=0x0,
type_class=type_class@entry=1, flags=1, skip_map=0x0) at dl-lookup.c:809
#1 0x0000555555564413 in _dl_fixup (l=<optimized out>, reloc_arg=<optimized
out>) at ../elf/dl-runtime.c:111
#2 0x000055555556ce1f in _dl_runtime_resolve_sse () at
../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-trampoline.h:112
#3 0x00007ffff762093a in __gmpn_divrem_1 () from /usr/lib/libgmp.so.10
#4 0xee6b280000000000 in ?? ()
#5 0x00007ffff6b0b138 in ?? ()
#6 0x00007ffff6b057d0 in ?? ()
#7 0x00000000ffffffe2 in ?? ()
#8 0x00007ffff6b057b8 in ?? ()
#9 0x00007ffff6b051b0 in ?? ()
#10 0x00007ffff6b0b1b0 in ?? ()
#11 0x00000000006b47d8 in ?? ()
#12 0x00000000006142a9 in ?? ()
#13 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) disass
Dump of assembler code for function _dl_lookup_symbol_x:
...
0x000055555555e915 <+117>: jne 0x55555555e900 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+96>
0x000055555555e917 <+119>: mov %eax,%eax
0x000055555555e919 <+121>: mov %rax,-0xb0(%rbp)
0x000055555555e920 <+128>: pxor %xmm0,%xmm0
0x000055555555e924 <+132>: mov $0xffffffff,%eax
0x000055555555e929 <+137>: incq 0x21d048(%rip) # 0x55555577b978
<_rtld_local+2424>
0x000055555555e930 <+144>: test %r12,%r12
0x000055555555e933 <+147>: mov %rax,-0xa0(%rbp)
=> 0x000055555555e93a <+154>: movaps %xmm0,-0x90(%rbp)
0x000055555555e941 <+161>: je 0x55555555e950 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+176>
rax 0xffffffff 4294967295
rbx 0x7ffff763c360 140737343898464
rcx 0x7ffff75cb3d7 140737343435735
rdx 0x0 0
rsi 0x33f9b936d4fb49a0 3745228210287888800
rdi 0x7ffff75cb3c5 140737343435717
rbp 0x7fffffffa148 0x7fffffffa148
rsp 0x7fffffffa058 0x7fffffffa058
r8 0x0 0
r9 0x1 1
r10 0x7ffff76494d0 140737343952080
r11 0x7ffff7620840 140737343785024
r12 0x0 0
r13 0x0 0
r14 0x7ffff76494d0 140737343952080
r15 0x7fffffffa170 140737488331120
rip 0x55555555e93a 0x55555555e93a <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+154>
eflags 0x10246 [ PF ZF IF RF ]
cs 0x33 51
ss 0x2b 43
ds 0x0 0
es 0x0 0
fs 0x0 0
gs 0x0 0
Comparison of disassembly of the function in question left with __attribute__
((__target__ ("no-mmx,no-sse"))) right without (segfaulting).
add %rsi,%rax | add %rsi,%rax
add %rdx,%rax | add %rdx,%rax
movzbl (%rcx),%edx | movzbl (%rcx),%edx
test %dl,%dl | test %dl,%dl
jne da0 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x60> | jne da0
<_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x60>
mov %eax,%ebx | mov %eax,%ebx
mov $0xffffffff,%eax | pxor %xmm0,%xmm0
test %r13,%r13 | mov $0xffffffff,%eax
movq $0x0,-0x80(%rbp) | test %r13,%r13
| mov %rax,-0x88(%rbp)
mov %rax,-0x88(%rbp) | movaps %xmm0,-0x80(%rbp)
movq $0x0,-0x78(%rbp) | je ddf
<_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x9f>
| testl $0xfffffffa,0x10(%rbp)
je de7 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0xa7> | jne 18e4
<_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0xba4>
testl $0xfffffffa,0x10(%rbp) | mov -0xb8(%rbp),%rax
jne 196c <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0xc2c> | test %r14,%r14
mov -0xb8(%rbp),%rax | mov (%rax),%r9
test %r14,%r14 | jne 1000
<_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x2c0>
mov (%rax),%r9 | test %r9,%r9
jne 1040 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x300> | movq $0x0,-0xc0(%rbp)
markus@x4 elf % gcc -O3 -c dl-lookup.i
markus@x4 elf % objdump -dr dl-lookup.o | grep movaps
14f4: 0f 29 45 80 movaps %xmm0,-0x80(%rbp)
163b: 0f 29 45 90 movaps %xmm0,-0x70(%rbp)
With -fno-vect-cost-model even 4.9 generates the segfaulting instruction.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503852-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:19:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503852-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8667 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:19:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8583 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 11:19:39 -0000
From: "majun4950646 at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4-xGLaUQTiGG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02779.txt.bz2
Content-length: 740
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
--- Comment #2 from majun <majun4950646 at 163 dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed, mine. This happens because get_inner_reference converts nchar_14
> to sizetype and thus we analyze the evolution of (uint64_t) nchar_14 which
> isn't affine unless we can prove nchar_14 will never wrap in its type
> (unsigned int).
how does scev handle type conversion now ?
I see many type conversion in ev function,And I think this may casue vect/para
failed for some loops.
I hit a parallel problem caused by scev type conversion handle in spec2k6 410.
for now I have no idea with this problem,I will open a new bug to report this.
thanks!
---Jun
>From gcc-bugs-return-503853-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:34:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503853-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63129 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:34:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63078 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 11:34:18 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4-agaLihubvQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02780.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1263
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, majun4950646 at 163 dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
>
> --- Comment #2 from majun <majun4950646 at 163 dot com> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Confirmed, mine. This happens because get_inner_reference converts nchar_14
> > to sizetype and thus we analyze the evolution of (uint64_t) nchar_14 which
> > isn't affine unless we can prove nchar_14 will never wrap in its type
> > (unsigned int).
>
> how does scev handle type conversion now ?
Correctly, but not optimally in this case.
> I see many type conversion in ev function,And I think this may casue vect/para
> failed for some loops.
One issue is that we ask SCEV about (uint64_t) nchar_14 in the first place
(of course data-ref users expect DR_OFFSET to be of sizetype). This is
an "artifact" of get_inner_reference. But as soon as you get a size
multiplier != 1 you'd need the cast anyway.
> I hit a parallel problem caused by scev type conversion handle in
> spec2k6 410. for now I have no idea with this problem,I will open a new
> bug to report this.
Thanks.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503854-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:39:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503854-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75435 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:39:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75378 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 11:39:03 -0000
From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4-3JYUXDVjJ5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02781.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to majun from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Confirmed, mine. This happens because get_inner_reference converts nchar_14
> > to sizetype and thus we analyze the evolution of (uint64_t) nchar_14 which
> > isn't affine unless we can prove nchar_14 will never wrap in its type
> > (unsigned int).
>
> how does scev handle type conversion now ?
Not very different to before actually. Only scev now is more aggressive when
determining overflow-ness in type conversion. It's still safe, the original
implementation is too conservative.
>
> I see many type conversion in ev function,And I think this may casue
> vect/para failed for some loops.
This is kind of expected because scev now understands that some type conversion
doesn't introduce overflow, so it creates SCEV for it.
>
> I hit a parallel problem caused by scev type conversion handle in spec2k6
> 410. for now I have no idea with this problem,I will open a new bug to
> report this.
Please, I'd like to look into more cases where scev fails.
Thanks,
bin
>From gcc-bugs-return-503855-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:40:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503855-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77329 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:40:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77296 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 11:40:52 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/62661] digit separator warning in if'ed out code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on resolution everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-62661-4-zTE4mwSKT0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-62661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02782.txt.bz2
Content-length: 788
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is correct tokenization has to happen in #if code.
But in C++14 tokenization should handle digit separators, see the definition of
pp-number in 2.9 [lex.ppnumber], which allows single quotes in a pp-number.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503856-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:47:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503856-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101611 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:47:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101563 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 11:47:52 -0000
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-oC2HCPSo3U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02783.txt.bz2
Content-length: 522
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You have left out bits of the disassembly which would show if the stack is
misaligned on entry of the function. (This would be a bug in GHC, not GCC.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503857-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:57:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503857-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113713 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:57:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113665 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 11:57:53 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-HWRFeeAvOK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02784.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2300
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
0000000000001470 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x>:
1470: 55 push %rbp
1471: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
1474: 41 57 push %r15
1476: 41 56 push %r14
1478: 41 55 push %r13
147a: 41 54 push %r12
147c: 49 89 d5 mov %rdx,%r13
147f: 53 push %rbx
1480: 49 89 f7 mov %rsi,%r15
1483: 4d 89 c6 mov %r8,%r14
1486: 48 81 ec a8 00 00 00 sub $0xa8,%rsp
148d: 0f b6 17 movzbl (%rdi),%edx
1490: 48 89 bd 68 ff ff ff mov %rdi,-0x98(%rbp)
1497: 48 89 8d 50 ff ff ff mov %rcx,-0xb0(%rbp)
149e: 44 89 8d 5c ff ff ff mov %r9d,-0xa4(%rbp)
14a5: 4c 8b 65 18 mov 0x18(%rbp),%r12
14a9: 84 d2 test %dl,%dl
14ab: 0f 84 cb 02 00 00 je 177c <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x30c>
14b1: 48 89 f9 mov %rdi,%rcx
14b4: b8 05 15 00 00 mov $0x1505,%eax
14b9: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
14c0: 48 89 c6 mov %rax,%rsi
14c3: 48 83 c1 01 add $0x1,%rcx
14c7: 48 c1 e6 05 shl $0x5,%rsi
14cb: 48 01 f0 add %rsi,%rax
14ce: 48 01 d0 add %rdx,%rax
14d1: 0f b6 11 movzbl (%rcx),%edx
14d4: 84 d2 test %dl,%dl
14d6: 75 e8 jne 14c0 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+0x50>
14d8: 89 c0 mov %eax,%eax
14da: 48 89 85 60 ff ff ff mov %rax,-0xa0(%rbp)
14e1: 66 0f ef c0 pxor %xmm0,%xmm0
14e5: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
14ea: 4d 85 f6 test %r14,%r14
14ed: 48 89 85 78 ff ff ff mov %rax,-0x88(%rbp)
14f4: 0f 29 45 80 movaps %xmm0,-0x80(%rbp)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503858-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 11:59:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503858-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122804 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 11:59:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122748 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 11:59:54 -0000
From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug plugins/61176] plugin builds including gimple.h not building
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: plugins
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61176-4-KZqf1a8XIb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61176-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61176-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02785.txt.bz2
Content-length: 214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #20 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
update for gcc-6: <build_dir>/gcc/params.list is also needed now as it gets
included by params.h.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:02:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130684 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:02:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130628 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:02:50 -0000
From: "dhowells at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68538] New: ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dhowells at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02786.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1130
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68538
Bug ID: 68538
Summary: ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when
cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dhowells at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36834
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36834&action=edit
Test program
I'm getting the following when compiling for a cris-linux-gnu target with
gcc-5.2.1:
warthog>cris-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -c output.c
output.c: In function ‘cfq_completed_request’:
output.c:51:1: internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027
}
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/> for instructions.
Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/cc89FntN.out file, please attach this to
your bugreport.
A testcase is attached.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503860-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:06:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503860-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48139 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:06:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48053 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:06:36 -0000
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-fcuypfF1Pm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02787.txt.bz2
Content-length: 713
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0)
> rbp 0x7fffffffa148 0x7fffffffa148
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> 0000000000001470 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x>:
> 1470: 55 push %rbp
> 1471: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 14f4: 0f 29 45 80 movaps %xmm0,-0x80(%rbp)
If I'm reading this correctly, %rsp was a multiple of 16 when the function is
entered, but this is not correct, it has to be congruent 8 modulo 16.
This looks like a GHC or GHCi bug (which may already have been fixed).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503861-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:08:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503861-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50893 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:08:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50850 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:08:43 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66112] __builtin_mul_overflow for int16_t emits poor code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-66112-4-sXqQymuWLH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02788.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1211
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
r223115 caused a code quality regression that I'm seeing on aarch64 with PR
68381.
We have
int
foo (unsigned short x, unsigned short y)
{
int r;
if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, &r))
__builtin_abort ();
return r;
}
and before the commit we used to generate:
foo:
uxth x0, w0
uxth x1, w1
mul x0, x0, x1
cmp x0, x0, sxtw
bne .L9
ret
.L9:
stp x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
add x29, sp, 0
bl abort
but after r223115 at -O3 on an aarch64 toolchain we generate:
foo:
uxth w0, w0
uxth w1, w1
stp x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
umull x0, w0, w1
add x29, sp, 0
tbnz w0, #31, .L6
mov w2, 0
cbnz w2, .L6
ldp x29, x30, [sp], 16
ret
.L6:
bl abort
>From gcc-bugs-return-503862-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:14:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503862-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72408 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:14:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72361 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:14:27 -0000
From: "afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68435-4-sUY0xWe0JW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02789.txt.bz2
Content-length: 511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
Alexander Fomin <afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Fomin <afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com> ---
Thanks, it works now.
I'll file another bug to track path splitting issues.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503863-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:25:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503863-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112648 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:25:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112590 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:25:36 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget component version
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-slD5VCjEd5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02790.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Version|unknown |6.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We vectorize zeroing of protected_value and current_value which both are
analyzed as being properly aligned. They are of type
struct sym_val
{
const Elf64_Sym *s;
struct link_map *m;
};
which would have natural alignment of 8 bytes only. The actual decls look
like
arg 0 <var_decl 0x7ffff62d4e10 current_value
type <record_type 0x7ffff67b2690 sym_val sizes-gimplified type_0 TI
size <integer_cst 0x7ffff68cccf0 constant 128>
unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff68ccd08 constant 16>
align 64 symtab 0 alias set 44 canonical type 0x7ffff67b2690 fields
<field_decl 0x7ffff6873098 s> context <translation_unit_decl 0x7ffff671dbb8
D.10151>
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff64dd5e8> chain <type_decl
0x7ffff6873000 D.9849>>
addressable used TI file dl-lookup.c line 810 col 18 size <integer_cst
0x7ffff68cccf0 128> unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff68ccd08 16>
align 128 context <function_decl 0x7ffff6a968c0 _dl_lookup_symbol_x>
and thus indeed have a DECL_ALIGN of 16 bytes. expand_one_var computes align
as
else
align = MINIMUM_ALIGNMENT (var, DECL_MODE (var), DECL_ALIGN (var));
128 as well and registers that with the output machinery.
Partition 2: size 64 align 16
all protected_value all
Partition 1: size 16 align 16
current_value
Partition 0: size 8 align 8
old_hash
which looks ok as well.
Breakpoint 11, expand_one_stack_var_at (
decl=<var_decl 0x7ffff62ddc60 protected_value>, base=0x7ffff68cc3a8,
base_align=128, offset=-64)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/cfgexpand.c:978
978 gcc_assert (offset == trunc_int_for_mode (offset, Pmode));
Breakpoint 11, expand_one_stack_var_at (
decl=<var_decl 0x7ffff62d4e10 current_value>, base=0x7ffff68cc3a8,
base_align=128, offset=-80)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/cfgexpand.c:978
978 gcc_assert (offset == trunc_int_for_mode (offset, Pmode));
ok as well. So does the intitial RTL (well, still virtual-stack-vars is life).
So this is an RTL optimization or target issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503864-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:30:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503864-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122096 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:30:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121467 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:30:01 -0000
From: "dhowells at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68538] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dhowells at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68538-4-jPLACqdJwA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02791.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3129
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68538
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com <dhowells at redhat dot com> ---
The cross-compiler was built from unpatched gcc sources produced from a gcc SVN
branch with the following parameters:
DATE 20151104
SVNREV 229753
gcc_version 5.2.1
The compiler was configured as:
CXXFLAGS=' -O2 -g -Wformat-security -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -mtune=generic ' \
CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET='-g -O2 -Wall -fexceptions' \
AR_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ar \
AS_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-as \
DLLTOOL_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-dlltool \
LD_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ld \
NM_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-nm \
OBJDUMP_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-objdump \
RANLIB_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ranlib \
READELF_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-readelf \
STRIP_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-strip \
WINDRES_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-windres \
WINDMC_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-windmc \
LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro ' \
../gcc-5.2.1-20151104/configure --bindir=/usr/bin
--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --datadir=/usr/share --disable-decimal-float
--disable-dependency-tracking --disable-gold --disable-libgcj --disable-libgomp
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libquadmath --disable-libssp
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-nls --disable-plugin --disable-shared
--disable-silent-rules --disable-sjlj-exceptions --disable-threads
--with-ld=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ld --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function
--enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-nls --enable-obsolete --enable-plugin
--enable-targets=all --exec-prefix=/usr --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--includedir=/usr/include --infodir=/usr/share/info --libexecdir=/usr/libexec
--localstatedir=/var --mandir=/usr/share/man --prefix=/usr
--program-prefix=cris-linux-gnu- --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sharedstatedir=/var/lib
--sysconfdir=/etc --target=cris-linux-gnu
--with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ --with-isl
--with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-newlib
--with-sysroot=/usr/cris-linux-gnu/sys-root --with-system-libunwind
--with-system-zlib --without-headers
And built with:
AR_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ar \
AS_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-as \
DLLTOOL_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-dlltool \
LD_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ld \
NM_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-nm \
OBJDUMP_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-objdump \
RANLIB_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-ranlib \
READELF_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-readelf \
STRIP_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-strip \
WINDRES_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-windres \
WINDMC_FOR_TARGET=/usr/bin/cris-linux-gnu-windmc \
make -C cris-linux-gnu -j5 tooldir=/usr all-gcc
make -C cris-linux-gnu -j5 tooldir=/usr all-target-libgcc
The binutils was 2.25.1 built as a cross for cris-linux-gnu.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503865-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:33:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503865-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69257 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:33:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63787 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:33:51 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-8KPUw0yAPC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02792.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1229
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0)
> > rbp 0x7fffffffa148 0x7fffffffa148
>
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > 0000000000001470 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x>:
> > 1470: 55 push %rbp
> > 1471: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>
> > 14f4: 0f 29 45 80 movaps %xmm0,-0x80(%rbp)
>
> If I'm reading this correctly, %rsp was a multiple of 16 when the function
> is entered, but this is not correct, it has to be congruent 8 modulo 16.
>
> This looks like a GHC or GHCi bug (which may already have been fixed).
Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest.
(Not sure how to report this issue to the ghc folks).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503866-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:35:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503866-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 697 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:35:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 131065 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:35:51 -0000
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-kIkuL355Df@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02793.txt.bz2
Content-length: 415
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
> Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest.
> (Not sure how to report this issue to the ghc folks).
To be honest, if Richard thinks there is a GCC bug here (and I read comment #4
this way), he's likely right and I'm wrong.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503867-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:40:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503867-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11921 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:40:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11834 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:39:57 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-WprwEGMJGb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02794.txt.bz2
Content-length: 550
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
>
> > Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest.
> > (Not sure how to report this issue to the ghc folks).
>
> To be honest, if Richard thinks there is a GCC bug here (and I read comment
> #4 this way), he's likely right and I'm wrong.
Well, only Haskell programs crash. So I think you're right.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503868-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:42:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503868-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32548 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:42:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32485 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:42:49 -0000
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-KLyAISp1lB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02795.txt.bz2
Content-length: 325
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7)
> Well, only Haskell programs crash.
This is a valid point. You can open a GHC ticket in Trac, after registering:
<https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/>
>From gcc-bugs-return-503869-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:43:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503869-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33317 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:43:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33221 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:43:00 -0000
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-qg0G9xAU0P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02796.txt.bz2
Content-length: 656
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2015-11/msg03020.ht
| |ml
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Series finally posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03020.html
Sorry for the delay.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503870-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:49:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503870-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50946 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:49:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50902 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:49:24 -0000
From: "martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] New: 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02797.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3068
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
Bug ID: 68540
Summary: 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential
include ordering problem
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de
Target Milestone: ---
Currently, compiling trunk on Linux Mint 17.2 fails. I'm configuring with
--disable-multilib --enable-gold --enable-plugins --disable-bootstrap
--prefix=$DESTDIR --enable-languages=c++,fortran --enable-target=all
--enable-checking=release, and "make" fails with
g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I. -I/home/martin/gcc/gcc -I/home/martin/gcc/gcc/.
-I/home/martin/gcc/gcc/../include -I/home/martin/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/home/martin/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I/home/martin/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/bid -I../libdecnumber
-I/home/martin/gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o graphite.o -MT graphite.o -MMD -MP
-MF ./.deps/graphite.TPo /home/martin/gcc/gcc/graphite.c
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/basic_ios.h:37:0,
from /usr/include/c++/4.8/ios:44,
from /usr/include/c++/4.8/ostream:38,
from /usr/include/c++/4.8/iostream:39,
from /usr/include/isl/int.h:17,
from /usr/include/isl/ctx.h:16,
from /usr/include/isl/list.h:13,
from /usr/include/isl/aff_type.h:4,
from /usr/include/isl/local_space.h:4,
from /usr/include/isl/constraint.h:13,
from /home/martin/gcc/gcc/graphite.c:56:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/locale_facets.h:240:53: error: macro "toupper" passed
2 arguments, but takes just 1
toupper(char_type *__lo, const char_type* __hi) const
^
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/locale_facets.h:269:53: error: macro "tolower" passed
2 arguments, but takes just 1
tolower(char_type* __lo, const char_type* __hi) const
^
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/locale_facets.h:812:53: error: macro "toupper" passed
2 arguments, but takes just 1
toupper(char_type *__lo, const char_type* __hi) const
^
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/locale_facets.h:845:53: error: macro "tolower" passed
2 arguments, but takes just 1
tolower(char_type* __lo, const char_type* __hi) const
[...]
I manage to bootstrap successfully on other (homegrown) distributions, but
since other gcc branches build OK, I suspect a problematic change on trunk
regarding the inclusion order of headers.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503871-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 12:50:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503871-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52585 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 12:50:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52530 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 12:50:12 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-YzSu5Z7zmj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02798.txt.bz2
Content-length: 374
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10)
> Series finally posted here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03020.html
>
> Sorry for the delay.
Many thanks for fixing this seemingly non-trivial issue!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503872-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:06:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503872-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129555 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:06:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129504 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:05:56 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-mc4lpzYQpG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02799.txt.bz2
Content-length: 191
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For the curious:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11133
>From gcc-bugs-return-503873-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:06:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503873-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130546 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:06:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130480 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:06:42 -0000
From: "afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68541] New: [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcctarget attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02800.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541
Bug ID: 68541
Summary: [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion
miss
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
CC: izamyatin at gmail dot com, law at redhat dot com,
ysrumyan at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i686-*-*
Created attachment 36835
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36835&action=edit
A reproducer
Due to path splitting on SSA trees introduced in r230364, we miss an
if-conversion opportunity for (cond ? s++ : s--) expressions.
As for now (r230865), when compiling the attached testcase with -O2, after RTL
ce1 pass we have
3 possible IF blocks searched.
1 IF blocks converted.
2 true changes made.
while compiling it with -O2 -fno-split-paths results in
1 possible IF blocks searched.
0 IF blocks converted.
0 true changes made.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503874-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:10:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503874-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2601 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:10:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2500 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:10:14 -0000
From: "afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68435] [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68435-4-DduNeGMasG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68435-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02801.txt.bz2
Content-length: 143
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Fomin <afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com> ---
Filed PR68541
>From gcc-bugs-return-503875-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:16:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503875-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93603 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:16:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93552 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:16:40 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68087-4-kbyGPl8BWt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02802.txt.bz2
Content-length: 505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Testing variants of Markus' suggestion.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503876-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:18:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503876-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15731 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:18:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10355 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:18:04 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68537] Vectorizer possibly miscompiles dynamic linker with -O3
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68537-4-Tbqk7fA60T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02803.txt.bz2
Content-length: 656
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68537
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
>
> > Ok. Well, I'm running GHC version 7.10.2, which is the latest.
> > (Not sure how to report this issue to the ghc folks).
>
> To be honest, if Richard thinks there is a GCC bug here (and I read comment
> #4 this way), he's likely right and I'm wrong.
No, I just assumed it is a bug because Markus inspected the assembler and
analyzed it to be broken. I just verified it is all well from vectorization to
RTL expansion.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503877-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:31:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503877-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48938 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:31:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48898 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:31:28 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68541] [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68541-4-pkjkg40qpO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02804.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1712
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. I don't understand why we split the path here. The condition is
_9 = MEM[base: _13, offset: 0B];
if (_9 >= 0)
goto <bb 5>;
else
goto <bb 6>;
;; succ: 5 [73.0%] (TRUE_VALUE,EXECUTABLE)
;; 6 [27.0%] (FALSE_VALUE,EXECUTABLE)
and thus has only a slight bias to true (73% vs. 27%). Path splitting,
if I understood correctly, only makes sense if the most taken path can be
made an inner loop using more optimal BB placement. Or if splitting the
path enables followup optimization in the duplicated tail - but then
this would fit more into DOM which actually does this kind of optimizations.
So - what for do we have this optimization again?
There is no check on kind of optimization / block frequency of any kind
in the pass, even optimize_*_for_size will happily duplicate all loop
tails if the CFG pattern matches.
Is this just for fun? Or why doesn't this have any kind of cost-model?
I'd have expected that it at least honors sth like
--param max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts or so.
It also looks like it duplicates the block twice and throws away the
original (via making it unreachable). Clearly wasteful.
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503878-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:36:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503878-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74094 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:36:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74039 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:36:42 -0000
From: "cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68532-4-PUWR8YLLOW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68532-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68532-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02805.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4762
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
CC| |cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is a simplified test case, which shows the incorrect way elements are
being read from the vector loads done in the vectorized loop.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdalign.h>
#define SIZE 128
unsigned short alignas(16) in[SIZE];
unsigned short alignas(16) out[SIZE];
__attribute__ ((noinline)) void
test (unsigned short *restrict out, unsigned short *restrict in)
{
int i;
for (int j = 0; j < SIZE; j+=8)
out[i++] = in[j];
}
int main()
{
for (int i = 0; i<SIZE; i++) in[i] = i;
test(out,in);
for (int i = 0; i<SIZE/8; i++) printf("result: %d, expect %d\n",out[i],
i*8);
return 0;
}
Results with armeb-unknown-linux-gnueabihf:
result: 36, expect 0 <- incorrect results from vectorized loop...
result: 44, expect 8
result: 52, expect 16
result: 60, expect 24
result: 4, expect 32
result: 12, expect 40
result: 20, expect 48
result: 28, expect 56
result: 64, expect 64 <- correct results come from fixup loop
result: 72, expect 72
result: 80, expect 80
result: 88, expect 88
result: 96, expect 96
result: 104, expect 104
result: 112, expect 112
result: 120, expect 120
The vectorized loop gives incorrect results, because it is compiled into a
sequence of vector loads with VUZP operations to extract every 8th element.
Looking at the generated assembly for test()
$ armeb-unknown-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -O1 -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model
-mfpu=neon tvuzp2.c -S
test:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
orr r2, r1, r0
tst r2, #15
bne .L2
vld1.64 {d16-d17}, [r1:64]
vldr d18, [r1, #16]
vldr d19, [r1, #24]
vuzp.16 q9, q8
vldr d18, [r1, #32]
vldr d19, [r1, #40]
vldr d20, [r1, #48]
vldr d21, [r1, #56]
vuzp.16 q10, q9
vuzp.16 q9, q8
vldr d18, [r1, #64]
vldr d19, [r1, #72]
vldr d20, [r1, #80]
vldr d21, [r1, #88]
vuzp.16 q10, q9
vldr d20, [r1, #96]
vldr d21, [r1, #104]
vldr d22, [r1, #112]
vldr d23, [r1, #120]
vuzp.16 q11, q10
vuzp.16 q10, q9
vuzp.16 q9, q8
vst1.64 {d16-d17}, [r0:64]
We see that the 128 bit vectors are loaded either with vld1.64 or a pair of
vldr instructions if the addressing mode requires an additional index. This
means the vectors are loaded thus:
layout of input array in memory:
<in> : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
<in+16>: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
<in+32>: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
<in+48>: 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
layout of q8 after vld1.64 {d16-d17}, [r1:64] (showing architectural lanes 0 to
7, in ascending order)
q8 = { 3, 2, 1, 0, 7, 6, 5, 4 }
So, the first 64 bits are loaded into lanes 0-3, but in big endian order, and
the 2nd 64 bits are loaded into lanes 4-7, also in big endian order.
The vectorizer expects that the result of loading a 128-bit vector into memory,
should be:
q8 = { 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 }
but the back end does not do that, in an attempt to support the EABI memory
ordering for 128 bit vectors. The behaviour of 128-bit vector loads/stores is
defined by output_move_neon(). There is a large comment in arm.c above
output_move_neon ("WARNING: The ordering of elements is weird in big-endian
mode...") which explains this.
The ARM back-end already uses a strategy of representing lane numbers in a "GCC
numbering", and transforming them to architectural numbering when generating
assembly. This is currently a simple reversal in big-endian mode, and a 1:1 map
in little endian.
I think this bug could be fixed by using a mapping lane numbers so that the
behaviour of output_move_neon() is taken into account. This would prevent the
vectorizer from using VUZP for the VEC_PERM_EXPR() in big-endian mode, because
the lanes specified would not match the behaviour of VUZP on 128 bit vectors.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503879-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 13:46:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503879-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55625 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 13:46:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55558 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 13:46:15 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68541] [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68541-4-9VPdtdrbd9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02806.txt.bz2
Content-length: 914
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It also looks like the "inner loop" will always have two exits now, one to
the outer loop and one to the original exit block. That doesn't sound like
sth desirable in any way (unless we can jump-thread one of the exits).
The single testcase added points at followup transforms in the duplicated tail
which would again mean that having the CFG transform separate from any
analysis and actual optimization is bad. In this case it fits more into
FSM "threading" territorry.
Not yet suggesting to remove this pass again, but close... at _least_
suggesting to limit it to -O3, optimize_function_for_speed (),
the duplication to the existing DOM threading param.
Btw, the added testcase doesn't show any difference in generated assembly
that looks like an improvement vs. -fno-split-paths.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:01:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503880-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15430 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:01:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15387 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:01:30 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68542] New: [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02807.txt.bz2
Content-length: 808
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
Bug ID: 68542
Summary: [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-*-*
We have two recent performance regressions on corei-avx2, the first with
-Ofast -march=native between r230066 (last good) and r230138 (first bad)
and the second with -flto added between r230277 (last good) and r230367 (first
bad).
http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CFP/sb-czerny-head-64-2006/recent.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-503881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:09:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503881-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77613 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:09:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77549 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:09:36 -0000
From: "su at cs dot ucdavis.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67778-4-IZkU2jPv21@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02808.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2350
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su <su at cs dot ucdavis.edu> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> I can't reproduce this error with today's trunk (6.0.0 20151125) on x86_64.
> I see a similar stack trace in bug 60598 but that was fixed over a year ago.
> Can you confirm that trunk compiles the test case as expected in your
> environment?
Martin, the originally reported test doesn't seem to crash the current trunk,
but the original test I have still fails. I reduced it again, and below is the
new test (note that the new test causes an ICE at both -O2 and -O3, and in both
32-bit and 64-bit modes):
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151122 (experimental) [trunk revision 230719] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:28:1: internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2284
}
^
0x78a2e6 maybe_record_trace_start
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2284
0x78a613 create_trace_edges
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2376
0x78c6ea scan_trace
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2590
0x78d3ea create_cfi_notes
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2616
0x78d3ea execute_dwarf2_frame
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2974
0x78d3ea execute
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:3454
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$
------------------------------------------------
int printf (const char *, ...);
int a, b, c;
int
fn1 (int p1, int p2)
{
return p1 > 2147483647 - p2 ? p1 : p1 + p2;
}
int
main ()
{
a = 0;
for (; a != 2; a = fn1 (a, 1))
{
if (b)
{
int d[1], e = 0, f;
for (; e != 3; e = fn1 (e, 1))
b = 0;
c = f = d[0];
}
b = 0;
}
printf ("%d\n", c);
return 0;
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-503882-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:13:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503882-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130472 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:13:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130421 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:13:05 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68534] No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68534-4-xnHNarkry3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68534-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68534-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02809.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1515
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36836
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36836&action=edit
Draft patch for the PR
The attached bootstraps and regtests OK on a tree heavily polluted by the
recursive allocatable component patch. I had to break this chunk out be hand
and so the patch might not apply cleanly. I'll do a proper job tonight.
Neither case of no dummies matching a finite number works correctly: neither
none in the interface nor none in the procedure declaration.
! { dg-do compile }
!
! Checks the fix for PR68534 in which checks for the number
! failed if either the interface or the module procedure had
! no dummies.
!
! Reported on clf at:
! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/-ZgbM5qkFmc
!
module m
implicit none
interface
module subroutine foo()
end subroutine foo
module subroutine bar(i)
integer, intent(inout) :: i
end subroutine bar
end interface
end module m
submodule(m) sm
contains
module subroutine foo(i) ! { dg-error "without matching arguments in
INTERFACE" }
integer, intent(inout) :: i
i = 42
end subroutine foo
module subroutine bar ! { dg-error "Mismatch in number of MODULE PROCEDURE
formal" }
print *, "bar"
end subroutine bar
end submodule sm
Annoyingly, the second test fails. Although the message is omitted, for some
reason the current locus is lost.
Paul
>From gcc-bugs-return-503883-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:20:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503883-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122202 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:20:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122123 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 14:20:15 -0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-wjGtW7ehWH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02810.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1150
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Are there any symbols in .text? If so, this is wrong. All symbols have to
> have 1 or more bytes after them. This is just how the ABI is. The creator of
Not AFAICS: otool -rv has
make-temp-file.o:
Relocation information (__TEXT,__text) 54 entries
address pcrel length extern type scattered symbolnum/value
[...]
00000257 False byte n/a VANILLA True 0x000003c0
which corresponds to this in the disassembly (otool -tv):
00000253 addb %al,%cl
00000255 sbbl $0xc3,%esi
00000258 leal 0x02(%esi),%eax
In the .s file, we have
addb %al, %cl
sbbl $3+_vartmp, %esi
leal 2(%esi), %eax
and
.zerofill __DATA,__bss2,_memoized_tmpdir,4,2
.const
.align 2
_vartmp:
.byte 47
[...]
So no zero-size symbol in sight.
I'm attaching preprocessed input, .s and .o files so you can see for
yourself.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-503884-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:21:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503884-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123521 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:21:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123440 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:21:20 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-kACzv2oCwM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02811.txt.bz2
Content-length: 248
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #28 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36837&action=edit
.i/.s/.o for 32-bit link failure
>From gcc-bugs-return-503887-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:22:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503887-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126171 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:22:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125950 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:22:10 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68528] Wrong constant folding
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work
Message-ID: <bug-68528-4-Qnlhhzhgtn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02813.txt.bz2
Content-length: 384
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |6.0
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk sofar.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503886-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:22:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503886-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124832 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:22:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124743 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 14:21:57 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68528] Wrong constant folding
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68528-4-mvN3b8KtUo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02814.txt.bz2
Content-length: 642
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 25 14:21:25 2015
New Revision: 230870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/68528
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Do not call negate_expr_p
on stripped operands.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr68528.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr68528.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503885-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:22:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503885-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124790 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:22:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124724 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:21:56 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68542-4-LF53fMTqj6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02812.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I was looking into 481.wrf degradation caused by r230309 on Haswell (-Ofast
-flto). I found this patch caused many loops in 'sint' function to be
vectorized. All these loops have form:
DO 1 II=N1STAR,N1END
IF ( icmask(II,JJ) ) THEN
...
ENDIF
1 CONTINUE
Where icmask is two-dimensional array of logicals. The problem is that only
35% of icmask values are .TRUE. and these values are not sparse.
This means in vectorized loop we usually have either all 0s or all 1s vector
mask and therefore perform many iterations with zero mask. Zero check for
vector mask patch by Yuri should (at least partly) resolve this issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503888-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:31:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503888-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54802 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:31:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54753 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:31:15 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68542-4-AAL2cGM4a2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02815.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-503889-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:36:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503889-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92955 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88915 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 14:35:57 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68385] [6 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68385-4-WdkFvN1410@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02816.txt.bz2
Content-length: 605
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 25 14:35:24 2015
New Revision: 230871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68385
* tree.c (integer_zerop, integer_onep, integer_each_onep)
(integer_all_onesp, integer_minus_onep, integer_pow2p)
(integer_nonzerop, integer_truep, tree_log2, tree_floor_log2)
(real_zerop, real_onep, real_minus_onep): Remove STRIP_NOPS.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503890-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:38:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503890-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111487 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:38:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111431 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 14:38:09 -0000
From: "cesar at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/63858] fixed form OpenACC directive ICE with -fopenacc -fopenmp
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63858-4-Loh23F4YTD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02817.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1216
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63858
--- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Nov 25 14:37:36 2015
New Revision: 230872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230872&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/63858
gcc/fortran/
* scanner.c (skip_oacc_attribute): Remove continue_flag parameter.
Rename as ...
(skip_free_oacc_sentinel): ... this.
(skip_omp_attribute): Remove continue_flag parameter. Rename as ...
(skip_free_omp_sentinel): ... this.
(skip_free_comments): Update to call skip_free_oacc_sentinel and
skip_free_omp_sentinel.
(skip_fixed_omp_sentinel): New function.
(skip_fixed_oacc_sentinel): New function.
(skip_fixed_comments): Fix mix of OpenACC and OpenMP sentinels in
continuation.
gcc/testsuite/
* goacc/omp-fixed.f: New test.
* goacc/omp.f95: Add check for mis-matched omp and acc continuations.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/omp-fixed.f
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/scanner.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/omp.f95
>From gcc-bugs-return-503891-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:39:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503891-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113955 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:39:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113901 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:39:01 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68542-4-fY7C0YrC7h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02818.txt.bz2
Content-length: 697
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, so previously we if-converted but with versioning and thus the if-converted
loop was not vectorized and thrown away?
So yes, for such cases we'd ideally have vector control-flow
if (!all-zero)
{
...
}
but best by not if-converting this in the first place. Note that the
above also applies to "regular" vectorization of if-converted code,
not only to 'masks' as with Yuris patch. I wonder if we can extend
that to re-introduce control flow. A vector == 0 check should be
fairly cheap and the transform keyed on how much code we can execute
conditionally.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503892-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:40:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503892-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6818 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:40:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6746 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 14:40:48 -0000
From: "cesar at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/63858] fixed form OpenACC directive ICE with -fopenacc -fopenmp
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-63858-4-vcY8Cqn9uo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02819.txt.bz2
Content-length: 519
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63858
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is fixed with an updated version of Ilmir's patch, which I posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03075.html.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503893-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 14:55:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503893-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92992 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 14:55:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92890 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 14:55:10 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-9KKFf2v6ms@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02820.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1012
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:15:04AM +0000, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything.
> > FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The
> > issue with EXPR_FUNCTION and cshift is a problem.
>
> The hurt is for those of us investigating the new regressions... That was 10
> minutes of my time to investigate, multiply that by the number of people
> watching for FAILs on their favourite targets (particularly with trunk as it is
> at the end of stage 1) there is certainly enough hurt to go round.
>
> Please revert the broken testcase and leave it for when you fix pr68227.
>
It took you 10 minutes to type 68227 into bugzilla's search feature?
I intend to commit the fix today. Unfortunately, I have a real job
and fixing gfortran is a hobby. Unnecessary code churn in the
repo is well unnecessary.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503894-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 15:05:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503894-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6030 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 15:05:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5974 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 15:05:05 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68227-4-Aps1jFaF6Q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02821.txt.bz2
Content-length: 506
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Nov 25 15:04:33 2015
New Revision: 230873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68227
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_do_allocate): Convert gcc_assert argument into
into part of conditional statement.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503896-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 15:12:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503896-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117389 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 15:12:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117356 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 15:12:46 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68227-4-fpDQ8h0nne@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02823.txt.bz2
Content-length: 404
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Placate the masses.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503895-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 15:12:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503895-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115909 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 15:12:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109733 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 15:12:13 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68227-4-p0l80GQKRU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02822.txt.bz2
Content-length: 368
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed of trunk. Thanks for he bug reports.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503897-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 15:37:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503897-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63073 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 15:37:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63030 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 15:37:37 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/66214] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with -O0 -g via gen_type_die_with_usage's dwarf2out.c:20250
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-66214-4-yi3IBZzi5X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02824.txt.bz2
Content-length: 452
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
>From gcc-bugs-return-503898-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 15:39:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503898-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64836 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 15:39:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64769 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 15:39:42 -0000
From: "ismail at i10z dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ismail at i10z dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68227-4-nKelQMH9dK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02825.txt.bz2
Content-length: 642
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
İsmail Dönmez <ismail at i10z dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ismail at i10z dot com
--- Comment #9 from İsmail Dönmez <ismail at i10z dot com> ---
This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a
better debug output for the failure. For now I see:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503899-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 15:50:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503899-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108951 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 15:50:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108899 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 15:50:13 -0000
From: "amker.cheng at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker.cheng at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4-zTvEpfetMz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02826.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
--- Comment #5 from bin.cheng <amker.cheng at gmail dot com> ---
The dump before ldist is as below:
foo1 ()
{
unsigned int nchar;
char c[10000];
<bb 2>:
c = {};
<bb 3>:
# nchar_14 = PHI <nchar_5(4), 9998(2)>
c[nchar_14] = 65;
nchar_5 = nchar_14 + 4294967295;
if (nchar_14 != 0)
goto <bb 4>;
else
goto <bb 5>;
<bb 4>:
goto <bb 3>;
<bb 5>:
bar (&c);
c ={v} {CLOBBER};
return 0;
}
Apparently, nchar_14 iterates from 9998 to 0 in the loop and it doesn't
overflow, while nchar_5 does overflow for the last iterations. It's true
&c[n_char_14] is an affine since the index doesn't overflow.
When I introduced the change computing non-overlfow control-iv in loop niter
analysis, I only did it for the simplest case, ie, loop exit condition with LT
comp code. This case falls in another case, ie, NE as the comp code. I think
this can be fixed in the same framework. Actually it's easy to enable
non-overflow control-iv computation in this case, then we can use the recorded
control-iv to prove that (sizetype)nchar_14 doesn't overflow and &c[nchar_14]
is an affine.
I will dig deeper and test a patch for this.
Thanks,
bin
>From gcc-bugs-return-503900-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:12:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503900-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121576 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:12:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120886 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 16:12:13 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/56158] bad enum values computed by operator~ in ios_base.h
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56158-4-6c78yf1Xeb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56158-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56158-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02827.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 25 16:11:40 2015
New Revision: 230884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230884&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Extend valid values of iostream bitmask types
Backport from mainline
2015-11-12 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/56158
* include/bits/ios_base.h (_Ios_Fmtflags, _Ios_Openmode, _Ios_Iostate):
Define enumerators to ensure all values of type int are valid values
of the enumeration type.
* testsuite/27_io/ios_base/types/fmtflags/case_label.cc: Add new cases.
* testsuite/27_io/ios_base/types/iostate/case_label.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/27_io/ios_base/types/openmode/case_label.cc: Likewise.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ios_base.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/types/fmtflags/case_label.cc
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/types/iostate/case_label.cc
branches/gcc-5-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/ios_base/types/openmode/case_label.cc
>From gcc-bugs-return-503901-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:17:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503901-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82735 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:17:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82643 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 16:17:46 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68227-4-lQU6YUkfBI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02828.txt.bz2
Content-length: 423
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a
> better debug output for the failure. For now I see:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
It should be fixed after r230873.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503902-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:20:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503902-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88072 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:20:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88017 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 16:20:37 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68486] [6 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68486-4-LSwLDqVeud@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02829.txt.bz2
Content-length: 458
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Unreopen.
Doing so;-)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503903-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:34:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503903-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3373 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:34:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3292 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 16:34:37 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-67778-4-XA6oifkHCU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02830.txt.bz2
Content-length: 440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ICE on the test case from comment #2 confirmed with today's trunk (6.0.0
20151125).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503904-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:40:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503904-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31222 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:40:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31154 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 16:40:48 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68087-4-hC6ukINGEm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02831.txt.bz2
Content-length: 884
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 25 16:40:16 2015
New Revision: 230886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-11-25 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/68087
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): Use tree_fits_shwi_p before
tree_to_shwi to avoid ICEs.
/testsuite
2015-11-25 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/68087
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503905-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:42:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503905-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41663 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:42:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41598 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 16:42:50 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68087-4-tttOJeTmJz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02832.txt.bz2
Content-length: 948
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 25 16:42:18 2015
New Revision: 230887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-11-25 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/68087
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): Use tree_fits_shwi_p before
tree_to_shwi to avoid ICEs.
/testsuite
2015-11-25 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/68087
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503907-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:44:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503907-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49333 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:44:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48020 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 16:44:33 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-55004-4-C2ACoTNzNv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55004-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55004-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02834.txt.bz2
Content-length: 492
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 68087, which changed state.
Bug 68087 Summary: [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-503906-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 16:44:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503906-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49211 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 16:44:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47991 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 16:44:33 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68087-4-QZfV8xRV9N@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02833.txt.bz2
Content-length: 474
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed. Thanks for handling this, Paolo.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503908-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:00:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503908-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31255 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:00:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31074 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:00:22 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68066] [6 Regression]: ICE in max_value, at wide-int.cc
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68066-4-bLb9ZgJEXh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68066-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68066-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02835.txt.bz2
Content-length: 439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68066
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Confirmed fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503909-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:03:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503909-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36606 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:03:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36510 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:03:33 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68128] A huge regression in Parboil v2.5 OpenMP CUTCP test (2.5 times lower performance)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68128-4-g9QjHYdXB0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68128-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68128-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02836.txt.bz2
Content-length: 866
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36838
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36838&action=edit
gcc6-pr68128.patch
Untested optimization to turn shared clauses of scalar vars into firstprivate
if quickly determined not to be written into in the body (during gimplification
plus tree-nested follow-up).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503910-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:09:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503910-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43132 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:09:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43078 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:09:47 -0000
From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68368] [6 regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68368-4-7CcKgYK0gf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02837.txt.bz2
Content-length: 213
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've noticed that this has just been fixed by r230871, so it was in fact a dup
of pr68385
>From gcc-bugs-return-503912-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:11:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503912-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44606 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:11:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44343 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:11:02 -0000
From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68385] [6 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68385-4-AeAT8N1K2q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02839.txt.bz2
Content-length: 443
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385
Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503911-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:11:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503911-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44386 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:11:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44312 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:11:01 -0000
From: "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68368] [6 regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68368-4-KOuwNlRDa3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02838.txt.bz2
Content-length: 504
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by r230871.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68385 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503913-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:17:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503913-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51634 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:17:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51574 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:17:08 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66112] __builtin_mul_overflow for int16_t emits poor code
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66112-4-z53t3iLi4f@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66112-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02840.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1081
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #12)
> r223115 caused a code quality regression that I'm seeing on aarch64 with PR
> 68381.
>
> We have
> int
> foo (unsigned short x, unsigned short y)
> {
> int r;
> if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, &r))
> __builtin_abort ();
> return r;
> }
>
> and before the commit we used to generate:
> foo:
> uxth x0, w0
> uxth x1, w1
> mul x0, x0, x1
> cmp x0, x0, sxtw
> bne .L9
> ret
> .L9:
> stp x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
> add x29, sp, 0
> bl abort
>
> but after r223115 at -O3 on an aarch64 toolchain we generate:
> foo:
> uxth w0, w0
> uxth w1, w1
> stp x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
> umull x0, w0, w1
> add x29, sp, 0
> tbnz w0, #31, .L6
> mov w2, 0
> cbnz w2, .L6
> ldp x29, x30, [sp], 16
> ret
> .L6:
> bl abort
You really should consider adding {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4<mode> and/or negv3<mode>
expanders if you have some better sequences you can generate over the generic
ones on some target.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503914-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:26:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503914-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80743 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:26:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80712 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:26:03 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68543] New: Implement overflow arithmetic standard names {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4<mode> and/or negv3<mode>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68543-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02841.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1292
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
Bug ID: 68543
Summary: Implement overflow arithmetic standard names
{u,}{add,sub,mul}v4<mode> and/or negv3<mode>
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66112#c13
we should consider implementing the various overflow arithmetic standard name
expanders that take a label argument and emit a jump to it if the operation
overflows.
A motivational example is the code quality regression from PR 68381:
int
foo(unsigned short x, unsigned short y)
{
int r;
if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, &r))
__builtin_abort ();
return r;
}
which for aarch64 at -O3 generates:
foo:
uxth w0, w0
uxth w1, w1
umull x0, w0, w1
tbnz w0, #31, .L6
mov w2, 0
cbnz w2, .L6
ret
.L6:
stp x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
add x29, sp, 0
bl abort
which could be improved
>From gcc-bugs-return-503915-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:27:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503915-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83005 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:27:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82943 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:27:18 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68381-4-vKTTA5a94X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02842.txt.bz2
Content-length: 262
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For the code quality regression Jakub recommends implementing an aarch64
expander for the overflow arithmetic standard names.
I've filed PR 68543 for that
>From gcc-bugs-return-503916-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:35:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503916-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96053 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:35:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96016 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:34:59 -0000
From: "jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68544] New: ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a function
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68544-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02843.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3147
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68544
Bug ID: 68544
Summary: ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a
function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36839
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36839&action=edit
Minimal test case
The attached code causes an internal compiler error with the latest source from
git master (commit 9c822ac) and 5.2.0. It attempts to pass the implicit
constructor for a derived type as an argument to a subroutine.
I don't know if this is valid code. I haven't found anything in the standards
which suggest either way yet. Sun's F90 compiler rejects it, but gives a useful
error message.
gfortran -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/jimmacarthur/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall/bin/gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/jimmacarthur/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-5.2.0/configure --with-languages=fortran
--prefix=/home/jimmacarthur/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC)
Compiler command line:
~/gcc-5.2.0/gccinstall/bin/gfortran -Wall -Wextra
pass-type-constructor-as-function.f
output:
pass-type-constructor-as-function.f:1:23:
SUBROUTINE sub (f)
1
Warning: Unused dummy argument ‘f’ at (1) [-Wunused-dummy-argument]
pass-type-constructor-as-function.f:7:0:
TYPE t
1
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xa20cdf crash_signal
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/toplev.c:383
0x67b990 gfc_sym_identifier
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:347
0x67c38a build_function_decl
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:2057
0x682fa5 gfc_get_symbol_decl(gfc_symbol*)
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:1487
0x693537 gfc_conv_variable
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:2312
0x690c8a gfc_conv_expr(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:7219
0x696048 gfc_conv_expr_reference(gfc_se*, gfc_expr*)
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:7319
0x68d3ff gfc_conv_procedure_call(gfc_se*, gfc_symbol*, gfc_actual_arglist*,
gfc_expr*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>*)
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:4831
0x6be024 gfc_trans_call(gfc_code*, bool, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c:419
0x66539c trans_code
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1743
0x685e54 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:5841
0x622648 translate_all_program_units
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5340
0x622648 gfc_parse_file()
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5537
0x6613e5 gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc-5.2.0/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:229
>From gcc-bugs-return-503917-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:39:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503917-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101047 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:39:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100963 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:39:17 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/67941] [5/6 Regression] calls on function pointer from a captureless lambda cause ubsan warning
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67941-4-mwVzYTmzLa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02844.txt.bz2
Content-length: 378
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67941
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
>From gcc-bugs-return-503918-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:46:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503918-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117889 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:46:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117844 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:46:17 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-sRQA97PXIC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02845.txt.bz2
Content-length: 539
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #15 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #13)
> Note that in addition to complaining if *any* exit to the function doesn't
> have the correct "out" value, you also need to complain if calls to
> functions with the context attribute don't have the necessary "in" value.
You also need to have checks to ensure that the value doesn't drop below 0.
Anyway given that this is happening, I suggest closing this gcc bug.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503919-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:50:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503919-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15018 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:50:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14937 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:50:51 -0000
From: "luser.droog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luser.droog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-jmnzkB0hbp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02846.txt.bz2
Content-length: 277
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #12 from M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> This sounds related to GMP/MPFR, can you recompile those?
Downloading the src packages now. Will update.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503920-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:56:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503920-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43270 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:56:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43214 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 17:56:38 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68544] ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a function
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68544-4-P1A0A6Dchl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68544-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68544-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02847.txt.bz2
Content-length: 611
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68544
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Confirmed from 4.8 up to trunk (6.0).
> Sun's F90 compiler rejects it, but gives a useful error message.
What is the message?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503921-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:57:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503921-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44836 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:57:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44740 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 17:57:47 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-m2V27u0mWi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02848.txt.bz2
Content-length: 588
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 25 17:57:15 2015
New Revision: 230893
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230893&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/67954
* lra-constraints.c (curr_insn_transform): Add check on scratch
pseudo when change class to NO_REGS. Add an assert.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/lra-constraints.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503922-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 17:59:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503922-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47016 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 17:59:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46953 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 17:59:07 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-Qa3TuhbXRG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02849.txt.bz2
Content-length: 556
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 25 17:58:35 2015
New Revision: 230894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/67954
* lra-constraints.c (curr_insn_transform): Add check on scratch
pseudo when change class to NO_REGS. Add an assert.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 18:03:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72200 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 18:03:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72138 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 18:03:37 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-e33pOGyhll@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02850.txt.bz2
Content-length: 345
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The problem occurred in rare cases when a pseudo created from a scratch was
reloaded and assigned to reg and memory back again. The new reload pseudo
loses "created from clobber" mark and occurs more once in insns.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 18:04:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503924-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73632 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 18:04:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73582 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 18:04:26 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-lJbz2pwMdt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02851.txt.bz2
Content-length: 441
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Assuming fixed for 5.3+.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503925-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 18:06:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503925-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85989 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 18:06:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85936 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 18:06:24 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/68545] New: gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp hides compiler error
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68545-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02852.txt.bz2
Content-length: 579
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68545
Bug ID: 68545
Summary: gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp hides compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When check in gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp fails due to compiler error,
guality.exp is skipped without any error messages, which hides compiler
error.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503926-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 18:54:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503926-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102535 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 18:54:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102487 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 18:54:51 -0000
From: "jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68544] ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a function
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68544-4-4ISh8zkrUp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68544-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68544-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02853.txt.bz2
Content-length: 309
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68544
--- Comment #2 from Jim MacArthur <jim.macarthur at codethink dot co.uk> ---
Sun f90 output:
CALL sub(t)
^
"pass-type-constructor-as-function.f", Line = 10, Column = 16: ERROR: This use
of derived type "T" is not valid.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 18:56:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503927-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104234 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 18:56:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 104183 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 18:56:00 -0000
From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug inline-asm/61692] ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61692-4-osXz7p7B3X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02854.txt.bz2
Content-length: 282
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine. Mine supports 33. Don't expect it to go past 40. Most folks won't. In
10-30 years, maybe we might need to update to 50, but we can do that then.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503928-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 18:58:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503928-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108942 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 18:58:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108852 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 18:58:44 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/67941] [5/6 Regression] calls on function pointer from a captureless lambda cause ubsan warning
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67941-4-I86tiJZJFR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02855.txt.bz2
Content-length: 488
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67941
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 25 18:58:11 2015
New Revision: 230897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230897&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67941
* lambda.c (maybe_add_lambda_conv_op): Mark _FUN as
no_sanitize_undefined.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/null-6.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/lambda.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503929-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 19:37:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503929-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66951 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 19:37:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66909 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 19:37:19 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-owxuedb82R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02856.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1402
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #16 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to PaX Team from comment #14)
> (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #13)
> > This approach won't necessarily provide the "different contexts for basic
> > block" warning that Sparse has, but I don't necessarily think we need that;
>
> can you give me an example of this?
Sparse warns if you can reach the same basic block with different context
values (for instance, with or without a lock held). That warning *may*
indicate a problem, but it can also just indicate code too intricate for Sparse
to understand.
> the thing is, my approach tracks the
> context with statement granularity so if you can tell the compiler where you
> expect specific states (such as the context attr on callees) checks can be
> inserted there easily, down to individual statements (say, the structure
> field accesses you mentioned).
Sounds good to me.
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #15)
> Anyway given that this is happening, I suggest closing this gcc bug.
Have we completely ruled out the possibility of a native GCC implementation?
This really doesn't seem specific to the Linux kernel in any way; it'd be nice
if this could work in most programs. We could add annotations to pthread
locking functions, and any program using locking would benefit.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503930-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 19:42:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503930-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123461 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 19:42:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123397 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 19:42:08 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68087-4-kGeSd1xfQm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02857.txt.bz2
Content-length: 963
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The testcase fails on i686-linux:
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C:6:26: error:
array subscript out of bound
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C:6:26: error:
array subscript out of bound
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C -std=c++11 (test for errors, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array13.C:6:26: error:
array subscript out of bound
>From gcc-bugs-return-503931-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 19:56:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503931-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29020 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 19:56:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28950 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 19:56:38 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67813] [C++14] copy-initialization of object with pointer member fails in constexpr function
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67813-4-UIcPhCAcaC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02858.txt.bz2
Content-length: 542
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67813
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 25 19:56:06 2015
New Revision: 230899
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230899&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67813
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Always use *valp if
set.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-copy1.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503933-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 19:56:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503933-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30361 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 19:56:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29874 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 19:56:50 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/67941] [5/6 Regression] calls on function pointer from a captureless lambda cause ubsan warning
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67941-4-oOPpWOIrpT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02859.txt.bz2
Content-length: 537
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67941
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 25 19:56:18 2015
New Revision: 230901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67941
* lambda.c (maybe_add_lambda_conv_op): Mark _FUN as
no_sanitize_undefined.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/null-6.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/lambda.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503932-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 19:56:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503932-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29774 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 19:56:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29369 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 19:56:44 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68422] compile-time cost of sizeof... is quadratic
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68422-4-imnv2Ow3mG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02860.txt.bz2
Content-length: 682
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68422
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 25 19:56:12 2015
New Revision: 230900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68422
* cp-tree.h (PACK_EXPANSION_SIZEOF_P): New.
* parser.c (cp_parser_sizeof_pack): Set it.
* pt.c (tsubst_copy) [SIZEOF_EXPR]: Likewise.
(tsubst_pack_expansion): Improve T... shortcut when set.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503934-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 20:38:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503934-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102640 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 20:38:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102473 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 20:38:16 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68087] [5/6 Regression] ICE with constexpr in array with negative index
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68087-4-kPphQLibTG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68087-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02861.txt.bz2
Content-length: 184
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
I see, thanks. I'm going to trivially tweak the dg-error.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503935-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 20:45:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503935-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114226 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 20:45:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114183 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 20:45:21 -0000
From: "klindsay at ucar dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68546] New: passing non-contiguous associated array section garbles results
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: klindsay at ucar dot edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02862.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1518
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Bug ID: 68546
Summary: passing non-contiguous associated array section
garbles results
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: klindsay at ucar dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36840
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36840&action=edit
program demonstrating problem
Hi,
I've associated a non-contiguous array section to a name.
I.e. A2=>A(2,:)
When I pass A2 to a subroutine, the contents are garbled (see below).
When I compile and run the attached program, I expect the output to be
write statement with fixed i section
201.0 202.0 203.0
----------
calling foo with fixed i section
201.0 202.0 203.0
----------
write statement with associated fixed i section
201.0 202.0 203.0
----------
calling foo with associated fixed i section
201.0 202.0 203.0
----------
Instead, with gfortran v5.2.0, the last 4 lines are
----------
calling foo with associated fixed i section
201.0 301.0 102.0
----------
If the contents of the associate construct are (A2=>A(:,2)), then the output
from the program is as I would expect it to be. So the problem seems to be
related to the non-contiguous nature of the array section.
Could this be looked into please?
Thank you,
Keith Lindsay
>From gcc-bugs-return-503936-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:09:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503936-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85179 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:09:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85154 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:09:15 -0000
From: "jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68547] New: incorrect optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02863.txt.bz2
Content-length: 963
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68547
Bug ID: 68547
Summary: incorrect optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36841
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36841&action=edit
test case
$ g++ test.cc -o test -O2 -Wall && ./test
DEL element[1]=200 volatile
DEL element[1]=200 last_element_index=2 (should be 2) volatile
DEL element[1]=200
DEL element[1]=200 last_element_index=1 (should be 2)
$ g++ test.cc -o test -O0 -Wall && ./test
DEL element[1]=200 volatile
DEL element[1]=200 last_element_index=2 (should be 2) volatile
DEL element[1]=200
DEL element[1]=200 last_element_index=2 (should be 2)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503938-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:13:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503938-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92086 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:13:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91907 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 21:13:35 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67354] [5 regression] internal compiler error: in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:421
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67354-4-zAsDxn11bv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02865.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1809
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 25 21:13:00 2015
New Revision: 230905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-11-20 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/67354
* cp-tree.h (defer_mangling_aliases): Declare.
(generate_mangling_aliases): New prototype.
* decl2.c (defer_mangling_aliases): New variable.
(note_mangling_alias): Use !defer_mangling_aliases
instead of at_eof.
(generate_mangling_aliases): No longer static. Clear
defer_mangling_aliases.
* optimize.c (maybe_thunk_body): Defer emitting mangling aliases
if !defer_mangling_aliases until the fns are put into the same
comdat group.
* g++.dg/abi/mangle67.C: New test.
2015-05-09 Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
PR bootstrap/66085
* decl2.c (note_mangling_alias): Declare arguments as unused.
2015-05-08 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* decl2.c (mangling_aliases): New variable.
(note_mangling_alias, generate_mangling_aliases): New.
(cp_write_global_declarations): Call generate_mangling_aliases.
(generate_mangling_alias): Split out from...
* mangle.c (mangle_decl): ...here.
* cp-tree.h: Declare note_mangling_alias.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle67.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/decl2.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/optimize.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503937-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:13:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503937-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91995 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:13:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91844 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 21:13:34 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/66085] [6 Regression] Revision r222934 breaks bootstrap on darwin.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66085-4-lgNGNSXha1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66085-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66085-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02864.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1808
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66085
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 25 21:13:00 2015
New Revision: 230905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-11-20 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/67354
* cp-tree.h (defer_mangling_aliases): Declare.
(generate_mangling_aliases): New prototype.
* decl2.c (defer_mangling_aliases): New variable.
(note_mangling_alias): Use !defer_mangling_aliases
instead of at_eof.
(generate_mangling_aliases): No longer static. Clear
defer_mangling_aliases.
* optimize.c (maybe_thunk_body): Defer emitting mangling aliases
if !defer_mangling_aliases until the fns are put into the same
comdat group.
* g++.dg/abi/mangle67.C: New test.
2015-05-09 Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
PR bootstrap/66085
* decl2.c (note_mangling_alias): Declare arguments as unused.
2015-05-08 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* decl2.c (mangling_aliases): New variable.
(note_mangling_alias, generate_mangling_aliases): New.
(cp_write_global_declarations): Call generate_mangling_aliases.
(generate_mangling_alias): Split out from...
* mangle.c (mangle_decl): ...here.
* cp-tree.h: Declare note_mangling_alias.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle67.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/decl2.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/mangle.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/optimize.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503939-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:14:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503939-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93777 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:14:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93700 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:14:37 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/67089] [4.9/5 Regression] Integer overflow checks not optimized on x86/x86_64
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-67089-4-uuXnGLj1As@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02866.txt.bz2
Content-length: 590
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] |[4.9/5 Regression] Integer
|Integer overflow checks not |overflow checks not
|optimized on x86/x86_64 |optimized on x86/x86_64
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on the trunk so far. Wonder if this is desirable to backport.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503940-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:20:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503940-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99791 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:20:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99721 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:20:14 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67354] [5 regression] internal compiler error: in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:421
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67354-4-0F9ffd9h8G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02867.txt.bz2
Content-length: 516
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 5.3+.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503941-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:21:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503941-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101795 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:21:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101769 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:21:33 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68547] incorrect optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68547-4-KBi42CGuUk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02868.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68547
Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You invoke undefined behavior (out-of-bounds array access):
$ g++ -fsanitize=undefined ./test.cc
$ ./a.out
DEL element[1]=200 volatile
./test.cc:17:57: runtime error: index 3 out of bounds for type 'unsigned int
[3]'
./test.cc:17:57: runtime error: load of address 0x000000601a3c with
insufficient space for an object of type 'unsigned int'
0x000000601a3c: note: pointer points here
2c 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00
^
DEL element[1]=200 last_element_index=2 (should be 2) volatile
DEL element[1]=200
./test.cc:26:57: runtime error: index 3 out of bounds for type 'unsigned int
[3]'
./test.cc:26:57: runtime error: load of address 0x000000601a3c with
insufficient space for an object of type 'unsigned int'
0x000000601a3c: note: pointer points here
2c 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>From gcc-bugs-return-503942-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:38:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503942-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12802 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:38:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12730 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:38:03 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67876] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67876-4-mg77OYOM4V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02869.txt.bz2
Content-length: 511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is crashing in Martin's new reject_gcc_builtin code.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503943-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:39:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503943-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55171 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:39:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45979 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:39:23 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68509] [6 regression][C++1z] ICE: in check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68509-4-MMei9OHAtg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02870.txt.bz2
Content-length: 561
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68509
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68396 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503944-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:39:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503944-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56590 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:39:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49039 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:39:24 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68396] function auto-deduced return types get incorrectly classified as parameter packs
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68396-4-k7Gn8pohUD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68396-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68396-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02871.txt.bz2
Content-length: 439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503945-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:42:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503945-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28388 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:42:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28342 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:42:37 -0000
From: "sje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68400] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2125
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68400-4-WAVhqZdYyv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68400-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68400-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02872.txt.bz2
Content-length: 578
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68400
Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Felix, I wasn't able to reproduce this with GCC 5.2 or with top-of-tree GCC
when compiling libpcap. Can you include a preprocessed source file (cut down
if possible) and list exactly what options you used.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503946-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:52:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503946-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40800 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:52:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40725 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:52:45 -0000
From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-709Xyk7O9z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02873.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2554
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #17 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #16)
> (In reply to PaX Team from comment #14)
> > can you give me an example of this?
>
> Sparse warns if you can reach the same basic block with different context
> values (for instance, with or without a lock held). That warning *may*
> indicate a problem, but it can also just indicate code too intricate for
> Sparse to understand.
i see, so this would basically trigger every time a lock is taken/released
based on a condition as in the example in comment #1? or is there some deeper
analysis done to avoid at least some false positives?
in any case, with my method this checking is pretty easy too since the SSA
representation ensures that we get a phi for the local context tracking
variable if different paths produce different values when a given basic block
is reached. it also seems that gcc can eliminate at least some trivial false
reports since none of your conditional locking examples produce a false
positive or negative (however i expect real linux code to do worse).
> (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #15)
> > Anyway given that this is happening, I suggest closing this gcc bug.
>
> Have we completely ruled out the possibility of a native GCC implementation?
> This really doesn't seem specific to the Linux kernel in any way; it'd be
> nice if this could work in most programs. We could add annotations to
> pthread locking functions, and any program using locking would benefit.
i agree, this context attribute based invariant verification is very generic
and could be worked into a general gcc feature. the plugin approach is a good
way to prototype it and get it some real life use before it'd make into the
compiler.
speaking of generalization, the encoding of the lock expression (e.g., lock
ptr) will have to change as it really doesn't seem feasible to refer to
function arguments from an attribute. as long as we expect to feed the compiler
only manual annotations, the only thing that matters is that the lock
expression be something unique, so as a compromise i suggest to simply make it
a string constant, which would both preserve context for a human programmer and
be also easy for the compiler to derive a unique name from for the local
variable tracking the given context. i.e., instead of
__attribute__((context(lock_expr, in, out))) we'd have
__attribute__((context("lock_expr", in, out))) and ditto for calling
__context__().
>From gcc-bugs-return-503947-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:57:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503947-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57286 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 21:57:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57242 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 21:57:52 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68547] incorrect optimization
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68547-4-M64TrPE6hZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68547-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02874.txt.bz2
Content-length: 584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68547
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That is:
(array_of_elements[last_element_index] != 0) && (last_element_index <
TEST_ARRAY_SIZE)
You should swap those two expressions to get correct behavior.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503948-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:00:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503948-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59955 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:00:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59892 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 22:00:54 -0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-x4W5AQAIcv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02875.txt.bz2
Content-length: 648
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
> Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
I've done some more digging and found that the switch from a gas-derived
as in Xcode 6.4 to the LLVM-based one in Xcode 7 caused this: assembling
the exact same .s file with both assemblers introduces the difference in
relocations causing ld to choke and the 32-bit bootstrap to break.
Command line is
as -arch i386 -force_cpusubtype_ALL -o make-temp-file.o make-temp-file.s
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-503949-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:01:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503949-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60770 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:01:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60716 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 22:01:11 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68523] CFG Expansion Computes Incorrect Block Frequencies for Nested Loops
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68523-4-RFFUY7eYxj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02876.txt.bz2
Content-length: 392
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68523
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Scratch that, ch changes the loop but is not the culprit.
Note there is one further edge at expand time: 2->9 with prob 0%.
This is created by unswitch. The transform is fine afaics, but it
doesn't update the execution freqs properly, giving the wrong
counts here.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503950-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:10:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503950-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103497 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:10:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102923 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 22:10:22 -0000
From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-sCinHYNDpX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02877.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #18 from Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett dot org> ---
(In reply to PaX Team from comment #17)
> (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #16)
> > (In reply to PaX Team from comment #14)
> > > can you give me an example of this?
> >
> > Sparse warns if you can reach the same basic block with different context
> > values (for instance, with or without a lock held). That warning *may*
> > indicate a problem, but it can also just indicate code too intricate for
> > Sparse to understand.
>
> i see, so this would basically trigger every time a lock is taken/released
> based on a condition as in the example in comment #1?
Yes.
> or is there some
> deeper analysis done to avoid at least some false positives?
Nope. Sparse always generates a warning in such a case. Usually you can work
around that by simplifying your locking, which seems like a good idea
regardless.
> in any case, with my method this checking is pretty easy too since the SSA
> representation ensures that we get a phi for the local context tracking
> variable if different paths produce different values when a given basic
> block is reached. it also seems that gcc can eliminate at least some trivial
> false reports since none of your conditional locking examples produce a
> false positive or negative (however i expect real linux code to do worse).
I don't think it makes sense to issue "differing contexts for basic block"
warnings at all.
> > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #15)
> > > Anyway given that this is happening, I suggest closing this gcc bug.
> >
> > Have we completely ruled out the possibility of a native GCC implementation?
> > This really doesn't seem specific to the Linux kernel in any way; it'd be
> > nice if this could work in most programs. We could add annotations to
> > pthread locking functions, and any program using locking would benefit.
>
> i agree, this context attribute based invariant verification is very generic
> and could be worked into a general gcc feature. the plugin approach is a
> good way to prototype it and get it some real life use before it'd make into
> the compiler.
>
> speaking of generalization, the encoding of the lock expression (e.g., lock
> ptr) will have to change as it really doesn't seem feasible to refer to
> function arguments from an attribute.
Doesn't seem too unreasonable to handle, actually. When parsing an attribute,
refer back to the function arguments; the context expression must either use
those or globals.
> as long as we expect to feed the
> compiler only manual annotations, the only thing that matters is that the
> lock expression be something unique, so as a compromise i suggest to simply
> make it a string constant, which would both preserve context for a human
> programmer and be also easy for the compiler to derive a unique name from
> for the local variable tracking the given context. i.e., instead of
> __attribute__((context(lock_expr, in, out))) we'd have
> __attribute__((context("lock_expr", in, out))) and ditto for calling
> __context__().
That fails for a really common case that should generate a warning:
spin_lock(&some_lock);
/* Piles of code */
spin_unlock(&some_other_lock);
I don't think stringizing the lock argument and using that as the context makes
sense, either, as it need not textually match to semantically match.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503951-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:10:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503951-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103588 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:10:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103457 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 22:10:25 -0000
From: "sje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68302-4-rTEamSNijd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02878.txt.bz2
Content-length: 894
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Aurelien,
I could not reproduce this on today’s top-of-tree or the top of the
gcc-5-branch.
Did you use any configure options when building GCC?
When you say 'compiled with debugging enabled' are you talking about just using
-g when compiling the test program or are you talking about something else?
I built a cross compiler on my x86 linux system targeting mips-linux-gnu and
used '-g -O2 -march=mips32r2' when compiling the test program but I did not get
a seg fault or an ICE or any other type of error.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503952-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:13:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503952-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108189 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:13:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108152 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 22:13:55 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68434] [concepts] ICE: same canonical type node for different types
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68434-4-cuGR3jK2R6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02879.txt.bz2
Content-length: 505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 25 22:13:23 2015
New Revision: 230909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68434
* pt.c (tsubst): Set PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS before
calling canonical_type_parameter.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr68434.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503953-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:21:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503953-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118206 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:21:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118156 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 22:21:23 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67876] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67876-4-TeVvzg5a2E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02880.txt.bz2
Content-length: 463
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'll take a look.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503954-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:52:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503954-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24464 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 22:52:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24366 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 22:52:49 -0000
From: "pageexec at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59856] Support sparse-style context checking, used to validate locking correctness
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pageexec at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59856-4-vuEicM5gdN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02881.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1788
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59856
--- Comment #19 from PaX Team <pageexec at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #18)
> (In reply to PaX Team from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #16)
> > speaking of generalization, the encoding of the lock expression (e.g., lock
> > ptr) will have to change as it really doesn't seem feasible to refer to
> > function arguments from an attribute.
>
> Doesn't seem too unreasonable to handle, actually. When parsing an
> attribute, refer back to the function arguments; the context expression must
> either use those or globals.
the problem is that gcc itself refuses to parse an expression that wants to
refer to a function argument (global variables work fine). this is something
that changed with gcc-5, previously such a reference would at least produce an
identifier_node (basically just the name of the referenced parameter but
without any reference to the parm_decl itself, so not too useful), now it's a
compile error:
error: 'p' undeclared here (not in a function)
so getting this to work would require frontend patches at least (and is beyond
what a plugin can do but see below for an idea).
> That fails for a really common case that should generate a warning:
>
> spin_lock(&some_lock);
> /* Piles of code */
> spin_unlock(&some_other_lock);
hmmm, true, so some parsing is inavoidable. the stringification idea may still
be viable however as the attribute parsing code runs as part of the frontend so
technically it has access to the parsing machinery and could perhaps extract at
least simple expressions (or just a function argument) from the string. i'll
make some experiments and see if i can get back a reference to a parm_decl at
least.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503955-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 23:05:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503955-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43023 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 23:05:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42968 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 23:05:40 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/67548] [5/6 Regression] LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 23:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67548-4-52Kdjxbrdt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02882.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1341
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Nov 25 23:05:07 2015
New Revision: 230915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/67548
* lto-plugin.c (linker_output, linker_output_set): New statics.
(all_symbols_read_handler): Add -flinker-output option.
(onload): Record linker_output info.
* ipa-visibility.c (cgraph_externally_visible_p,
varpool_node::externally_visible_p): When doing incremental linking,
hidden symbols may be still used later.
(update_visibility_by_resolution_info): Do not drop weak during
incremental link.
(function_and_variable_visibility): Fix formating.
* flag-types.h (lto_linker_output): Declare.
* common.opt 9flag_incremental_link): New flag.
* lto-lang.c (lto_post_options): Process flag_lto_linker_output.
* lang.opt (lto_linker_output): New enum.
(flinker_output): New flag.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/common.opt
trunk/gcc/flag-types.h
trunk/gcc/ipa-visibility.c
trunk/gcc/lto/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/lto/lang.opt
trunk/gcc/lto/lto-lang.c
trunk/lto-plugin/ChangeLog
trunk/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503956-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 23:18:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503956-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79510 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 23:18:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79480 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 23:18:53 -0000
From: "mattst88 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68548] New: gcc wrongly warns about uninitialized data
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 23:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mattst88 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02883.txt.bz2
Content-length: 725
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68548
Bug ID: 68548
Summary: gcc wrongly warns about uninitialized data
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mattst88 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36842
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36842&action=edit
u.c
gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized wrongly warns about data0 being uninitialized in the
attached test case.
This may be a duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
>From gcc-bugs-return-503957-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 23:30:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503957-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122048 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 23:30:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122013 invoked by uid 55); 25 Nov 2015 23:30:30 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/66516] missing diagnostic on taking the address of a builtin function
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 23:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66516-4-hWcnhMzKGH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66516-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66516-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02884.txt.bz2
Content-length: 621
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66516
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Nov 25 23:29:57 2015
New Revision: 230916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/66516 - missing diagnostic on taking the address of a builtin function
* g++.dg/addr_builtin-1.C: New test (accidentally omitted from
initial commit).
* gcc.dg/addr_builtin-1.c: Same.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/addr_builtin-1.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/addr_builtin-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503958-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 23:47:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503958-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83475 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2015 23:47:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 83448 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2015 23:47:43 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68546] passing non-contiguous associated array section garbles results
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 23:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68546-4-aGTYMMfeRd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02885.txt.bz2
Content-length: 674
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Confirmed from 4.8 up to trunk (6.0). BLOCK is not implemented in 4.6. 4.6 and
4.7 gives
calling foo with associated fixed i section
***** 0.0 NaN
Related to/Duplicate of PR64773.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503959-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 00:25:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503959-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44880 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 00:25:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44441 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 00:24:57 -0000
From: "ian at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/61303] gccgo: segfault, regression since 4.8.2
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61303-4-SQ5ZKuKSN1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02886.txt.bz2
Content-length: 665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61303
--- Comment #10 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org <ian at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Nov 26 00:24:21 2015
New Revision: 230922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61303
runtime: don't overallocate in select code
If we've already allocated an fd_set, don't allocate another one.
Also, don't bother to read from rdwake if it wasn't returned in select.
Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/PR61303.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17243
Modified:
trunk/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
trunk/libgo/runtime/netpoll_select.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503961-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 00:25:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503961-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47356 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 00:25:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47295 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 00:25:44 -0000
From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/61303] gccgo: segfault, regression since 4.8.2
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-61303-4-bRZa58tU10@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02888.txt.bz2
Content-length: 553
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61303
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
This seems to have been due to a bug in the select support, which is only used
on Solaris. Should be fixed on mainline and GCC 5 branch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503960-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 00:25:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503960-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46189 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 00:25:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45780 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 00:25:05 -0000
From: "ian at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/61303] gccgo: segfault, regression since 4.8.2
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61303-4-VpRL8K6z1x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02887.txt.bz2
Content-length: 647
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61303
--- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org <ian at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Nov 26 00:24:33 2015
New Revision: 230923
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230923&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61303
runtime: don't overallocate in select code
If we've already allocated an fd_set, don't allocate another one.
Also, don't bother to read from rdwake if it wasn't returned in select.
Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/PR61303.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17243
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/libgo/runtime/netpoll_select.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-503962-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:00:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503962-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52542 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 00:59:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52461 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 00:59:54 -0000
From: "majun4950646 at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68529-4-Shug7WUNss@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02889.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1613
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529
--- Comment #6 from majun <majun4950646 at 163 dot com> ---
(In reply to bin.cheng from comment #5)
> The dump before ldist is as below:
>
> foo1 ()
> {
> unsigned int nchar;
> char c[10000];
>
> <bb 2>:
> c = {};
>
> <bb 3>:
> # nchar_14 = PHI <nchar_5(4), 9998(2)>
> c[nchar_14] = 65;
> nchar_5 = nchar_14 + 4294967295;
> if (nchar_14 != 0)
> goto <bb 4>;
> else
> goto <bb 5>;
>
> <bb 4>:
> goto <bb 3>;
>
> <bb 5>:
> bar (&c);
> c ={v} {CLOBBER};
> return 0;
>
> }
>
> Apparently, nchar_14 iterates from 9998 to 0 in the loop and it doesn't
> overflow, while nchar_5 does overflow for the last iterations. It's true
> &c[n_char_14] is an affine since the index doesn't overflow.
> When I introduced the change computing non-overlfow control-iv in loop niter
> analysis, I only did it for the simplest case, ie, loop exit condition with
> LT comp code. This case falls in another case, ie, NE as the comp code. I
> think this can be fixed in the same framework. Actually it's easy to enable
> non-overflow control-iv computation in this case, then we can use the
> recorded control-iv to prove that (sizetype)nchar_14 doesn't overflow and
> &c[nchar_14] is an affine.
>
> I will dig deeper and test a patch for this.
>
> Thanks,
> bin
Does https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02317.html describe your
framework ?
it seems for now loop_exits_before_overflow should only handle th LT and GT
case ?
I'll see how does this framework do.
Thanks,
Jun
>From gcc-bugs-return-503963-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:32:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503963-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91802 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 01:32:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91722 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 01:32:05 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68548] bogus "may be used uninitialized" (predicate analysis)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc version blocked short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68548-4-uUBIJlbEsm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02890.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1569
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68548
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|unknown |6.0
Blocks| |24639
Summary|gcc wrongly warns about |bogus "may be used
|uninitialized data |uninitialized" (predicate
| |analysis)
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Matt Turner from comment #0)
> Created attachment 36842 [details]
> u.c
>
> gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized wrongly warns about data0 being uninitialized in
> the attached test case.
>
> This may be a duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
No, it is not. This is just that the uninit predicate analysis is not powerful
enough. It sees that the DEF is guarded by writemask_3(D) & 1, but it sees that
the use is guarded by remaining_8 == 0, and it doesn't seem to analyse further
than that.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
[Bug 24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues
>From gcc-bugs-return-503964-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:33:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503964-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93090 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 01:33:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93061 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 01:33:46 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/41868] cell microcode instruction (addic.) is generated for a trivial loop with -O2 optimizations, hurting performance badly
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-41868-4-N5ESI0e2jc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-41868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-41868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02891.txt.bz2
Content-length: 656
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41868
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As Andrew notes in comment #3, "addic." is not microcoded on Cell BE.
I fixed this misclassification about a year ago (it used to be type
"compare", now is "add").
Current trunk also does not do a load/store; all is good now.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503965-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:41:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503965-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97501 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 01:41:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97407 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 01:41:16 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/48001] inconsistent warning within loop always taken and outside the loop
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-48001-4-Um41KqIxsj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-48001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-48001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02892.txt.bz2
Content-length: 847
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to jerome.borme from comment #3)
> The initialization of sum_f has been forgotten, but no warning is issued,
> although sum_f is used in the loop.
I get in 6.0 even with -O1:
test.c:12:3: error: ‘sum_f’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
so it seems this got fixed somehow. Please reopen if this is not the case.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503966-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:41:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503966-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97510 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 01:41:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97435 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 01:41:17 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-24639-4-9ZsvLlug2m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-24639-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-24639-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02893.txt.bz2
Content-length: 499
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 48001, which changed state.
Bug 48001 Summary: inconsistent warning within loop always taken and outside the loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48001
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
>From gcc-bugs-return-503967-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:52:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503967-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25690 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 01:52:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25602 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 01:52:38 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67876] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67876-4-kpGMMfgc2W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02894.txt.bz2
Content-length: 665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Nov 26 01:52:04 2015
New Revision: 230924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67876 - [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
gcc/cp
* pt.c (convert_template_argument): Make sure number of tree
operands is greater than zero before attempting to extract one.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/pr67876.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-503968-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 01:53:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503968-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26500 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 01:53:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26424 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 01:53:07 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67876] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67876-4-LVSJJnJiE2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02895.txt.bz2
Content-length: 436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed with r230924.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503969-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 02:02:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503969-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120857 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 02:02:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119360 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 02:02:28 -0000
From: "dbaryshkov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dbaryshkov at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-ubSPl657P7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02896.txt.bz2
Content-length: 223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail dot com> ---
This also needs to be applied to the 4.9 branch -- it also contains an
offending commit.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503970-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 02:13:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503970-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70123 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 02:13:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69297 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 02:13:00 -0000
From: "luser.droog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luser.droog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-wHmwJFRYbQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02897.txt.bz2
Content-length: 20369
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #13 from M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog at gmail dot com> ---
I get the same error compiling GMP.
Following instructions from http://stackoverflow.com/a/9450422/733077
josh@LAPTOP-ILO10OOF /tmp
$ cd gmp-4.3.2
josh@LAPTOP-ILO10OOF /tmp/gmp-4.3.2
$ mkdir ../gcc
josh@LAPTOP-ILO10OOF /tmp/gmp-4.3.2
$ ./configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-cygwin
checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-cygwin
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking ABI=64
checking compiler gcc -O2 -pedantic -m64 ... yes
checking compiler gcc -O2 -pedantic -m64 -mtune=k8... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.exe
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... .exe
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C99... none needed
checking for gcc option to accept ISO Standard C... (cached) none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking build system compiler gcc... yes
checking for build system preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for build system executable suffix... .exe
checking whether build system compiler is ANSI... yes
checking for build system compiler math library... -lm
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep
checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E
using ABI="64"
CC="gcc"
CFLAGS="-O2 -pedantic -m64 -mtune=k8"
CPPFLAGS=""
MPN_PATH=" x86_64 generic"
checking for function prototypes... yes
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking whether assembler supports --noexecstack option... no
checking for ar... ar
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe
checking if the linker (/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe) is GNU ld... yes
checking for /usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe option to reload object files...
-r
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking how to recognize dependent libraries... file_magic ^x86 archive
import|^x86 DLL
checking for dlltool... dlltool
checking for as... as
checking for objdump... objdump
checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 8192
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for ar... (cached) ar
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for strip... strip
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -DDLL_EXPORT
checking if gcc PIC flag -DDLL_EXPORT works... yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe) supports
shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... Win32 ld.exe
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... no
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
configure: creating libtool
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking fcntl.h usability... yes
checking fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking float.h usability... yes
checking float.h presence... yes
checking for float.h... yes
checking invent.h usability... no
checking invent.h presence... no
checking for invent.h... no
checking langinfo.h usability... yes
checking langinfo.h presence... yes
checking for langinfo.h... yes
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking nl_types.h usability... no
checking nl_types.h presence... no
checking for nl_types.h... no
checking sys/attributes.h usability... no
checking sys/attributes.h presence... no
checking for sys/attributes.h... no
checking sys/iograph.h usability... no
checking sys/iograph.h presence... no
checking for sys/iograph.h... no
checking sys/mman.h usability... yes
checking sys/mman.h presence... yes
checking for sys/mman.h... yes
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking sys/processor.h usability... no
checking sys/processor.h presence... no
checking for sys/processor.h... no
checking sys/pstat.h usability... no
checking sys/pstat.h presence... no
checking for sys/pstat.h... no
checking sys/sysinfo.h usability... yes
checking sys/sysinfo.h presence... yes
checking for sys/sysinfo.h... yes
checking sys/syssgi.h usability... no
checking sys/syssgi.h presence... no
checking for sys/syssgi.h... no
checking sys/systemcfg.h usability... no
checking sys/systemcfg.h presence... no
checking for sys/systemcfg.h... no
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking sys/times.h usability... yes
checking sys/times.h presence... yes
checking for sys/times.h... yes
checking for sys/resource.h... yes
checking for sys/sysctl.h... no
checking for machine/hal_sysinfo.h... no
checking whether fgetc is declared... yes
checking whether fscanf is declared... yes
checking whether optarg is declared... yes
checking whether ungetc is declared... yes
checking whether vfprintf is declared... yes
checking whether sys_errlist is declared... yes
checking whether sys_nerr is declared... yes
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking for intmax_t... yes
checking for long double... yes
checking for long long... yes
checking for ptrdiff_t... yes
checking for quad_t... no
checking for uint_least32_t... yes
checking for preprocessor stringizing operator... yes
checking for working volatile... yes
checking for C/C++ restrict keyword... restrict
checking whether <stdarg.h> exists and works... yes
checking whether gcc __attribute__ ((const)) works... yes
checking whether gcc __attribute__ ((malloc)) works... yes
checking whether gcc __attribute__ ((mode (XX))) works... yes
checking whether gcc __attribute__ ((noreturn)) works... yes
checking for inline... inline
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca (via gmp-impl.h)... yes
checking how to allocate temporary memory... alloca
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking format of `double' floating point... IEEE little endian
checking for alarm... yes
checking for attr_get... no
checking for clock... yes
checking for clock_gettime... yes
checking for cputime... no
checking for getpagesize... yes
checking for getrusage... yes
checking for gettimeofday... yes
checking for getsysinfo... no
checking for localeconv... yes
checking for memset... yes
checking for mmap... yes
checking for mprotect... yes
checking for nl_langinfo... yes
checking for obstack_vprintf... no
checking for popen... yes
checking for processor_info... no
checking for pstat_getprocessor... no
checking for raise... yes
checking for read_real_time... no
checking for sigaction... yes
checking for sigaltstack... yes
checking for sigstack... no
checking for syssgi... no
checking for strchr... yes
checking for strerror... yes
checking for strnlen... yes
checking for strtol... yes
checking for strtoul... yes
checking for sysconf... yes
checking for sysctl... no
checking for sysctlbyname... no
checking for times... yes
checking for vsnprintf... yes
checking whether vsnprintf works... yes
checking whether sscanf needs writable input... no
checking for struct pst_processor.psp_iticksperclktick... no
checking for suitable m4... m4
checking if m4wrap produces spurious output... no
checking how to switch to text section... .text
checking how to switch to data section... .data
checking for assembler label suffix... :
checking for assembler global directive... .globl
checking for assembler global directive attribute...
checking if globals are prefixed by underscore... no
checking how to switch to read-only data section... .section .rdata,"dr"
checking for assembler .type directive...
checking for assembler .size directive...
checking for assembler local label prefix... L
checking for assembler byte directive... .byte
checking how to define a 32-bit word... .long
checking if .align assembly directive is logarithmic... no
checking if the .align directive accepts an 0x90 fill in .text... yes
checking for unsigned short... yes
checking size of unsigned short... 2
checking for unsigned... yes
checking size of unsigned... 4
checking for unsigned long... yes
checking size of unsigned long... 8
checking for mp_limb_t... yes
checking size of mp_limb_t... 8
checking for stack_t... yes
checking for tputs in -lncurses... yes
checking for readline in -lreadline... no
checking readline detected... no
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... no
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
creating config.m4
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating demos/pexpr-config.h
config.status: creating demos/calc/calc-config.h
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating mpbsd/Makefile
config.status: creating mpf/Makefile
config.status: creating mpn/Makefile
config.status: creating mpq/Makefile
config.status: creating mpz/Makefile
config.status: creating printf/Makefile
config.status: creating scanf/Makefile
config.status: creating cxx/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/devel/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/mpbsd/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/mpf/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/mpn/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/mpq/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/mpz/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/rand/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/misc/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/cxx/Makefile
config.status: creating doc/Makefile
config.status: creating tune/Makefile
config.status: creating demos/Makefile
config.status: creating demos/calc/Makefile
config.status: creating demos/expr/Makefile
config.status: creating gmp.h
config.status: creating mp.h
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/add.c to mpn/add.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/add_1.c to mpn/add_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/aors_n.asm to mpn/add_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sub.c to mpn/sub.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sub_1.c to mpn/sub_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/aors_n.asm to mpn/sub_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/neg_n.c to mpn/neg_n.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/mul_1.asm to mpn/mul_1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/aorsmul_1.asm to mpn/addmul_1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/aorsmul_1.asm to mpn/submul_1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/lshift.asm to mpn/lshift.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/rshift.asm to mpn/rshift.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/dive_1.asm to mpn/dive_1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/diveby3.c to mpn/diveby3.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/divis.c to mpn/divis.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/divrem.c to mpn/divrem.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/divrem_1.asm to mpn/divrem_1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/divrem_2.asm to mpn/divrem_2.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/fib2_ui.c to mpn/fib2_ui.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mod_1.c to mpn/mod_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/mod_34lsub1.asm to mpn/mod_34lsub1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/mode1o.asm to mpn/mode1o.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/pre_mod_1.c to mpn/pre_mod_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dump.c to mpn/dump.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mod_1_1.c to mpn/mod_1_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mod_1_2.c to mpn/mod_1_2.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mod_1_3.c to mpn/mod_1_3.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mod_1_4.c to mpn/mod_1_4.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mul.c to mpn/mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mul_fft.c to mpn/mul_fft.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mul_n.c to mpn/mul_n.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/mul_basecase.asm to mpn/mul_basecase.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/sqr_basecase.asm to mpn/sqr_basecase.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/random.c to mpn/random.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/random2.c to mpn/random2.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/pow_1.c to mpn/pow_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/rootrem.c to mpn/rootrem.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sqrtrem.c to mpn/sqrtrem.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/get_str.c to mpn/get_str.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/set_str.c to mpn/set_str.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/scan0.c to mpn/scan0.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/scan1.c to mpn/scan1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/popham.asm to mpn/popcount.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/popham.asm to mpn/hamdist.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/cmp.c to mpn/cmp.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/perfsqr.c to mpn/perfsqr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/bdivmod.c to mpn/bdivmod.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcd_1.c to mpn/gcd_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcd.c to mpn/gcd.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcdext_1.c to mpn/gcdext_1.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcdext.c to mpn/gcdext.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcd_lehmer.c to mpn/gcd_lehmer.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcd_subdiv_step.c to mpn/gcd_subdiv_step.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcdext_lehmer.c to mpn/gcdext_lehmer.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/gcdext_subdiv_step.c to
mpn/gcdext_subdiv_step.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/tdiv_qr.c to mpn/tdiv_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dc_divrem_n.c to mpn/dc_divrem_n.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sb_divrem_mn.c to mpn/sb_divrem_mn.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/jacbase.c to mpn/jacbase.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/get_d.c to mpn/get_d.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/matrix22_mul.c to mpn/matrix22_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/hgcd2.c to mpn/hgcd2.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/hgcd.c to mpn/hgcd.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mullow_n.c to mpn/mullow_n.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mullow_basecase.c to mpn/mullow_basecase.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom22_mul.c to mpn/toom22_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom33_mul.c to mpn/toom33_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom44_mul.c to mpn/toom44_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom32_mul.c to mpn/toom32_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom42_mul.c to mpn/toom42_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom62_mul.c to mpn/toom62_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom53_mul.c to mpn/toom53_mul.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom2_sqr.c to mpn/toom2_sqr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom3_sqr.c to mpn/toom3_sqr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom4_sqr.c to mpn/toom4_sqr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom_interpolate_5pts.c to
mpn/toom_interpolate_5pts.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/toom_interpolate_7pts.c to
mpn/toom_interpolate_7pts.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/invert.c to mpn/invert.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/binvert.c to mpn/binvert.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sb_div_qr.c to mpn/sb_div_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sb_divappr_q.c to mpn/sb_divappr_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sb_div_q.c to mpn/sb_div_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dc_div_qr.c to mpn/dc_div_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dc_divappr_q.c to mpn/dc_divappr_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dc_div_q.c to mpn/dc_div_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mu_div_qr.c to mpn/mu_div_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mu_divappr_q.c to mpn/mu_divappr_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mu_div_q.c to mpn/mu_div_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sb_bdiv_q.c to mpn/sb_bdiv_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/sb_bdiv_qr.c to mpn/sb_bdiv_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dc_bdiv_q.c to mpn/dc_bdiv_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/dc_bdiv_qr.c to mpn/dc_bdiv_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mu_bdiv_q.c to mpn/mu_bdiv_q.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/mu_bdiv_qr.c to mpn/mu_bdiv_qr.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/divexact.c to mpn/divexact.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/bdiv_dbm1c.asm to mpn/bdiv_dbm1c.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/redc_1.asm to mpn/redc_1.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/redc_2.c to mpn/redc_2.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/powm.c to mpn/powm.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/powlo.c to mpn/powlo.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/powm_sec.c to mpn/powm_sec.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/subcnd_n.c to mpn/subcnd_n.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/copyi.asm to mpn/copyi.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/copyd.asm to mpn/copyd.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/com_n.asm to mpn/com_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/and_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/andn_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/nand_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/ior_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/iorn_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/nior_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/xor_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/logops_n.asm to mpn/xnor_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/invert_limb.asm to mpn/invert_limb.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/mul_2.asm to mpn/mul_2.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/addmul_2.asm to mpn/addmul_2.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/addlsh1_n.asm to mpn/addlsh1_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/sublsh1_n.asm to mpn/sublsh1_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/rsh1add_n.asm to mpn/rsh1add_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/rsh1sub_n.asm to mpn/rsh1sub_n.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/generic/addsub_n.c to mpn/addsub_n.c
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/addaddmul_1msb0.asm to
mpn/addaddmul_1msb0.asm
config.status: linking ./mpn/x86_64/gmp-mparam.h to gmp-mparam.h
josh@LAPTOP-ILO10OOF /tmp/gmp-4.3.2
$ make && make check && make install
gcc `test -f 'gen-fac_ui.c' || echo './'`gen-fac_ui.c -o gen-fac_ui.exe
./gen-fac_ui 64 0 >mpz/fac_ui.h || (rm -f mpz/fac_ui.h; exit 1)
gcc `test -f 'gen-fib.c' || echo './'`gen-fib.c -o gen-fib.exe
./gen-fib header 64 0 >fib_table.h || (rm -f fib_table.h; exit 1)
./gen-fib table 64 0 >mpn/fib_table.c || (rm -f mpn/fib_table.c; exit 1)
gcc `test -f 'gen-bases.c' || echo './'`gen-bases.c -o gen-bases.exe -lm
./gen-bases header 64 0 >mp_bases.h || (rm -f mp_bases.h; exit 1)
./gen-bases table 64 0 >mpn/mp_bases.c || (rm -f mpn/mp_bases.c; exit 1)
gcc `test -f 'gen-psqr.c' || echo './'`gen-psqr.c -o gen-psqr.exe -lm
gen-psqr.c: In function ‘print’:
gen-psqr.c:443:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(1.0 - sq_res_0x100_fraction) * 100.0,
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Makefile:1349: recipe for target 'gen-psqr.exe' failed
make: *** [gen-psqr.exe] Error 1
josh@LAPTOP-ILO10OOF /tmp/gmp-4.3.2
$
>From gcc-bugs-return-503971-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 02:39:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503971-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39710 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 02:39:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39652 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 02:39:07 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/54303] -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections and -fmerge-constants do not work well together
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-54303-4-vtHogNmyle@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02898.txt.bz2
Content-length: 448
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is fixed now.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503972-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 03:00:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503972-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59261 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 03:00:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59107 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 02:59:59 -0000
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/192] String literals don't obey -fdata-sections
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.95.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-192-4-4bPp8Fn8G6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02899.txt.bz2
Content-length: 625
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm closing this bug. If there is some other (still supported) case we
do not support well, please open a new bug report.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503973-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 03:17:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503973-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122852 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 03:17:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122759 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 03:17:01 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64860] [5/6 Regression] multiple definition of typeinfo in 5.0 (4.9.2 works)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-64860-4-9tQO13SSr9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64860-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64860-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02900.txt.bz2
Content-length: 971
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is another bug related to incremental linking and LTO. I will redirect
them all to PR67548. The testcase now works on mainline GCC in a sense that the
duplicate is gone and we get missing typeinfo:
lib1.lib:<artificial>:typeinfo for CDialogBase: error: undefined reference to
'vtable for __cxxabiv1::__class_type_info'
/usr/bin/ld: the vtable symbol may be undefined because the class is missing
its key function
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
that seems intended.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 67548 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503974-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 03:17:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503974-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122922 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 03:17:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122833 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 03:17:05 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/67548] [5/6 Regression] LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67548-4-KCkZxiLl6L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67548-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02901.txt.bz2
Content-length: 439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 64860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-503975-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 05:58:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503975-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116765 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 05:58:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 116677 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 05:58:21 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67581] [6 Regression] ICE on transparent union with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_type failed)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67581-4-TjVREa2PPO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02902.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1587
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67581
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The following should fix it:
Index: c-family/c-common.c
===================================================================
--- c-family/c-common.c (revision 230924)
+++ c-family/c-common.c (working copy)
@@ -7787,7 +7787,8 @@ handle_transparent_union_attribute (tree
*node = type = build_duplicate_type (type);
}
- TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (type) = 1;
+ for (tree t = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type); t; t = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (t))
+ TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (t) = 1;
return NULL_TREE;
}
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr67581.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr67581.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr67581.C (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+union U
+{
+ int x;
+ float y;
+} __attribute__ ((__transparent_union__));
>From gcc-bugs-return-503976-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 06:12:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503976-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19626 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 06:12:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19560 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 06:12:51 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/67106] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED. with -g -fpack-struct
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc component
Message-ID: <bug-67106-4-iGuMC3eE1c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02903.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67106
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joseph at codesourcery dot com
Component|debug |c
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here start_struct set TYPE_PACKED in:
start_struct (loc=8576, code=RECORD_TYPE, name=0x7ffff6beeaf0,
enclosing_struct_parse_info=0x7fffffffe848) at ../../gcc/c/c-decl.c:7218
7218 *enclosing_struct_parse_info = struct_parse_info;
(gdb) l
7213 }
7214
7215 C_TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (ref) = 1;
7216 TYPE_PACKED (ref) = flag_pack_struct;
7217
7218 *enclosing_struct_parse_info = struct_parse_info;
7219 struct_parse_info = XNEW (struct c_struct_parse_info);
7220 struct_parse_info->struct_types.create (0);
7221 struct_parse_info->fields.create (0);
7222 struct_parse_info->typedefs_seen.create (0);
(
normally the TYPE_PACKED is copied to variants in finish_record_layout but in
this testcase the structure is never finished:
typedef struct S S;
struct S
{
struct
{
S *s;
};
int a;
};
<record_type 0x7ffff6bdb1f8 S packed type_0 VOID
align 8 symtab -155260016 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff6bdb1f8
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff6bdb5e8> chain <type_decl
0x7ffff6afbd10 D.1755>>
<record_type 0x7ffff6bdb2a0 S VOID
align 8 symtab -155260096 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff6bdb1f8
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff6bdb540> chain <type_decl
0x7ffff6afbd10 D.1755>>
I see three options
1) make start_struct to copy the flag to variants
2) drop verify_type checking for incomplette structures as TYPE_PACKED on
these is irrelevant
3) make C FE to set the flag only on functions being completed somewhere in
finish_struct.
I would preffer 1 or 3. Joseph, what would be best?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503977-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 06:17:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503977-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24895 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 06:17:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24826 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 06:17:01 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/67106] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED. with -g -fpack-struct
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67106-4-TA7CwBZvzv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02904.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1751
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67106
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Actually in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66325 I already went
for variant walk. Will thus test:
Index: c/c-decl.c
===================================================================
--- c/c-decl.c (revision 230924)
+++ c/c-decl.c (working copy)
@@ -7213,7 +7213,8 @@ start_struct (location_t loc, enum tree_
}
C_TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (ref) = 1;
- TYPE_PACKED (ref) = flag_pack_struct;
+ for (tree v = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (ref); v; v = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (v))
+ TYPE_PACKED (v) = flag_pack_struct;
*enclosing_struct_parse_info = struct_parse_info;
struct_parse_info = XNEW (struct c_struct_parse_info);
Index: testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr67106.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr67106.c (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr67106.c (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-options "-g -fpack-struct" } */
+typedef struct S S;
+
+struct S
+{
+ struct
+ {
+ S *s;
+ };
+ int a;
+};
+
>From gcc-bugs-return-503978-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 06:17:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503978-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25829 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 06:17:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25753 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 06:17:41 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/66325] [6 Regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/930408-1.c, verify_type fails with --enable-checking=yes on arm-none-eabi
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66325-4-J7X4TktCKS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02905.txt.bz2
Content-length: 461
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66325
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I believe this was fixed by the patch above.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503979-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 06:19:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503979-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27539 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 06:19:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27479 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 06:19:40 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/66269] Issues with mixing strict aliasing (verify_type ICE with Ada)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66269-4-wqhiF9gYPD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66269-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66269-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02906.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1332
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66269
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This was fixed (well masked) by:
2015-11-24 Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
* alias.c (get_alias_set): Before checking TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P
double check that type is main variant.
* tree.c (build_variant_type_copy): Clear TYPE_ALIAS_SET when producing
variant.
(verify_type_variant): Verify that variants have no
TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P set
* tree-streamer-out.c (pack_ts_type_common_value_fields): Reorder
streaming so constant fields come first; stream TYPE_ALIAS_SET==0
only for main variants; stream TYPE_ALIAS_SET as a bit.
* tree-streamer-in.c (unpack_ts_type_common_value_fields): Update
accordingly.
the underlying issue that -fstrict-aliasing does not work correctly across
different units or with optimization attribute remains. I will open
independent bug for this. At least here was nothing Ada specific.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503980-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 06:36:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503980-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47347 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 06:36:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47271 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 06:36:54 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/66103] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with LTO and "-g -O0" via dwarf2out.c's gen_type_die_with_usage
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66103-4-lzTjnA1X5Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02907.txt.bz2
Content-length: 506
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66103
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This testcase seems to work now even with -ffat-lto-objects, so I am closing
the PR.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503981-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 07:09:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503981-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94066 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 07:09:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94006 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 07:09:18 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/67289] ICE in ipa-devirt.c
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67289-4-Gh5iUx15qP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02908.txt.bz2
Content-length: 365
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
gnat1 build works for me, but similar problem reproduces for me during Firefox
build. Apparently we manage to set TREE_PUBLIC of TYPE_STUB_DECL of an
anonymous type. I will try to track down where it hapepns (probably before LTO
streaming)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503982-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 07:27:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503982-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68539 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 07:27:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68493 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 07:27:42 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68546] passing non-contiguous associated array section garbles results
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc dependson
Message-ID: <bug-68546-4-FEaGDKYWZl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02909.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1544
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends on| |64773
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We're missing an internal_pack here.
This works, as expected:
module x
contains
subroutine foo(A_sect)
real :: A_sect(:)
write(*, '(3(1x,f5.1))') A_sect(:)
end subroutine foo
end module x
program assoc
use x
integer :: i, j
real :: A(3,3)
do j = 1, 3
do i = 1, 3
A(i,j) = 100.0*i + j
end do
end do
write(*,'(a)') 'write statement with fixed i section'
write(*, '(3(1x,f5.1))') A(2,:)
write(*,'(a)') '----------'
write(*,'(a)') 'calling foo with fixed i section'
call foo(A(2,:))
write(*,'(a)') '----------'
write(*,'(a)') 'write statement with associated fixed i section'
associate( A2 => A(2,:) )
write(*, '(3(1x,f5.1))') A2
end associate
write(*,'(a)') '----------'
write(*,'(a)') 'calling foo with associated fixed i section'
associate( A2 => A(2,:) )
call foo(A2)
end associate
write(*,'(a)') '----------'
end program assoc
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64773
[Bug 64773] [F2008] Not packing arrays with changing variable used for size in
block
>From gcc-bugs-return-503983-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 07:54:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503983-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31436 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 07:54:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31369 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 07:54:46 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68549] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02910.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1548
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Bug ID: 68549
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at
cfgloop.c:1669
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
During final Firefox libxul LTO link:
...
/home/trippels/gecko-dev/layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp: In member function
‘_ZN8nsIFrame10PeekOffsetEP18nsPeekOffsetStruct.part.253.constprop’:
/home/trippels/gecko-dev/layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:6332:0: error: loop 17’s
latch is missing
nsIFrame::PeekOffset(nsPeekOffsetStruct* aPos)
/home/trippels/gecko-dev/layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:6332:0: internal compiler
error: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
0x1020444b verify_loop_structure()
../../gcc/gcc/cfgloop.c:1669
0x10507417 checking_verify_loop_structure
../../gcc/gcc/cfgloop.h:325
0x10507417 loop_optimizer_init(unsigned int)
../../gcc/gcc/loop-init.c:106
0x108fb3d3 execute
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4777
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make: *** [/home/trippels/tmp/ccuTrM43.ltrans34.ltrans.o] Error 1
Reducing...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503984-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 07:56:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503984-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33303 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 07:56:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33220 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 07:56:28 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64773] [F2008] Not packing arrays with changing variable used for size in block
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-64773-4-WPsgxEeN7p@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02911.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1032
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64773
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I just realized that gfortran actually does the Right Thing here.
We pass the array to baz using seqence association, so the first 16
elements of a are set to one. This is what is supposed to happen.
When we use
program main
integer :: n
n = 5
block
integer, dimension(n, n) :: a
a = 0
n = n - 1
call baz(a)
print '(5I2)',a
end block
contains
subroutine baz(a)
integer, dimension(:,:), intent(inout) :: a
a = 1
end subroutine baz
end program main
everything works perfectly.
Resolving as invalid (and grumbling about the pitfalls of sequence
association).
>From gcc-bugs-return-503985-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 07:56:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503985-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33311 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 07:56:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33228 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 07:56:29 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68546] passing non-contiguous associated array section garbles results
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68546-4-bQvDWbObWi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02912.txt.bz2
Content-length: 502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Bug 68546 depends on bug 64773, which changed state.
Bug 64773 Summary: [F2008] Not packing arrays with changing variable used for size in block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64773
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
>From gcc-bugs-return-503986-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:02:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503986-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57619 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:02:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57542 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:02:28 -0000
From: "ismail at i10z dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ismail at i10z dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68227-4-mG0Ccf3gXf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02913.txt.bz2
Content-length: 516
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
--- Comment #11 from İsmail Dönmez <ismail at i10z dot com> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a
> > better debug output for the failure. For now I see:
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr68227.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
>
> It should be fixed after r230873.
Indeed it is, thanks!
>From gcc-bugs-return-503987-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:28:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503987-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82719 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:28:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82659 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:28:02 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/67289] ICE in ipa-devirt.c
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67289-4-BGCilf8rzD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02914.txt.bz2
Content-length: 7232
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |jason at redhat dot com,
| |rguenther at suse dot de
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I reproduced the problem on firefox. What happens is that we call
DECL_ASSEMBER_NAME on TYPE_DECL before its visibility is finalized. This means
that the name "<anon>" is produced and we never revisit it to real assembler
name.
The DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME on the TYPE_DECL is triggered by:
#0 contains_struct_check (__g=0x169b10a
<mangle_decl(tree_node*)::__FUNCTION__> "mangle_decl", __l=3602, __f=0x1592b00
"../../gcc/cp/mangle.c", __s=TS_DECL_MINIMAL, __t=0x7fffe53e17b8)
at ../../gcc/tree.h:3105
#1 mangle_decl (decl=0x7fffe53e17b8) at ../../gcc/cp/mangle.c:3602
#2 0x0000000000fb64f4 in decl_assembler_name (decl=0x7fffe53e17b8) at
../../gcc/tree.c:670
#3 0x00000000009ca36e in add_linkage_attr (die=0x7fffe5393be0, decl=<optimized
out>) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:17255
#4 0x00000000009edb45 in gen_typedef_die (context_die=0x7fffe5393b90,
decl=0x7fffe53e17b8) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20633
#5 gen_typedef_die (decl=0x7fffe53e17b8, context_die=0x7fffe5393b90) at
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20569
#6 0x00000000009d4c76 in gen_decl_die (decl=0x7fffe53e17b8, origin=<optimized
out>, context_die=0x7fffe5393b90) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21522
#7 0x00000000009d87f7 in gen_type_die_with_usage (type=0x7fffe53e0b28,
context_die=0x7fffe5393b90, usage=DINFO_USAGE_DIR_USE) at
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20780
#8 0x00000000009d9f47 in gen_type_die (type=0x7fffe53e0b28,
context_die=<optimized out>) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20932
#9 0x00000000009d483e in gen_decl_die (decl=0x7fffe53e12f8, origin=<optimized
out>, context_die=0x7fffe5393b90) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21519
#10 0x00000000009d6d1b in gen_member_die (context_die=0x7fffe5393b90,
type=0x7fffe53e09d8) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20411
#11 gen_struct_or_union_type_die (usage=<optimized out>,
context_die=0x7ffff6b01000, type=0x7fffe53e09d8) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20516
#12 gen_tagged_type_die (usage=<optimized out>, context_die=0x7ffff6b01000,
type=0x7fffe53e09d8) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20717
#13 gen_tagged_type_die (type=0x7fffe53e09d8, context_die=<optimized out>,
usage=<optimized out>) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20658
#14 0x00000000009d8d9a in gen_type_die_with_usage (type=0x7fffe53e09d8,
context_die=0x7ffff6b01000, usage=DINFO_USAGE_DIR_USE) at
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20877
#15 0x00000000009d9f47 in gen_type_die (type=0x7fffe53e09d8,
context_die=<optimized out>) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:20932
#16 0x00000000009d483e in gen_decl_die (decl=0x7fffe5392390, origin=<optimized
out>, context_die=0x7ffff6b01000) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21519
#17 0x00000000009d5bbd in dwarf2out_decl (decl=0x7fffe5392390) at
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21978
#18 0x00000000009d5eb3 in dwarf2out_type_decl (decl=<optimized out>,
local=<optimized out>) at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21688
#19 dwarf2out_type_decl (decl=<optimized out>, local=<optimized out>) at
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21683
#20 0x0000000000c582fc in rest_of_type_compilation (type=0x7fffe53e09d8,
toplev=1) at ../../gcc/passes.c:335
#21 0x00000000006d161f in finish_struct_1 (t=0x7fffe53e09d8) at
../../gcc/cp/class.c:6776
This happens by:
type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
if (type == error_mark_node)
return;
if (is_naming_typedef_decl (TYPE_NAME (type)))
{
/* Here, we are in the case of decl being a typedef naming
an anonymous type, e.g:
typedef struct {...} foo;
In that case TREE_TYPE (decl) is not a typedef variant
type and TYPE_NAME of the anonymous type is set to the
TYPE_DECL of the typedef. This construct is emitted by
the C++ FE.
TYPE is the anonymous struct named by the typedef
DECL. As we need the DW_AT_type attribute of the
DW_TAG_typedef to point to the DIE of TYPE, let's
generate that DIE right away. add_type_attribute
called below will then pick (via lookup_type_die) that
anonymous struct DIE. */
if (!TREE_ASM_WRITTEN (type))
gen_tagged_type_die (type, context_die, DINFO_USAGE_DIR_USE);
/* This is a GNU Extension. We are adding a
DW_AT_linkage_name attribute to the DIE of the
anonymous struct TYPE. The value of that attribute
is the name of the typedef decl naming the anonymous
struct. This greatly eases the work of consumers of
this debug info. */
add_linkage_attr (lookup_type_die (type), decl);
}
lookup_type_die does:
static void
add_linkage_attr (dw_die_ref die, tree decl)
{
const char *name = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl));
/* Mimic what assemble_name_raw does with a leading '*'. */
if (name[0] == '*')
name = &name[1];
if (dwarf_version >= 4)
add_AT_string (die, DW_AT_linkage_name, name);
else
add_AT_string (die, DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name, name);
}
I wonder what that GNU extensionis about. Clearly attributing the types with
assembler name <anon> is not going to win anything. Moreover I think with early
debug we now apparently manage to consider typedefs anonymous when they really
are not. The TREE_PUBLIC is later revisited by:
#0 set_linkage_according_to_type (decl=0x7fffe53e12f8) at
../../gcc/cp/class.c:757
#1 0x00000000006d4fbf in reset_type_linkage_1 (type=0x7fffe53e0b28) at
../../gcc/cp/decl2.c:2632
#2 0x00000000007efa08 in binding_table_foreach (table=0x7fffe53b2f00,
proc=0x6d5090 <bt_reset_linkage_1(binding_entry, void*)>, data=0x0) at
../../gcc/cp/name-lookup.c:258
#3 0x00000000006e1b19 in reset_type_linkage (type=0x7fffe53e09d8) at
../../gcc/cp/decl2.c:2700
#4 0x0000000000628374 in grokdeclarator (declarator=0x219ff00,
declspecs=<optimized out>, decl_context=NORMAL, initialized=0,
attrlist=0x7fffffffd618) at ../../gcc/cp/decl.c:10700
#5 0x000000000062b606 in start_decl (declarator=0x219ff00,
declspecs=0x7fffffffd730, initialized=0, attributes=0x0, prefix_attributes=0x0,
pushed_scope_p=0x7fffffffd6b0)
at ../../gcc/cp/decl.c:4788
#6 0x0000000000706fff in cp_parser_init_declarator (parser=0x7ffff1f87f30,
decl_specifiers=0x7fffffffd730, checks=0x0, function_definition_allowed_p=22,
member_p=false,
declares_class_or_enum=0, function_definition_p=0x7fffffffd7cf,
maybe_range_for_decl=0x0, init_loc=0x7fffffffd7c8) at
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:18070
>From gcc-bugs-return-503988-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:30:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503988-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85555 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:30:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 85468 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:29:58 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-HgyZVAZPnj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02915.txt.bz2
Content-length: 202
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This will take a while: 8 input files required, 46MB preprocessed code...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503989-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:40:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503989-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109852 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:40:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109589 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:40:16 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/67289] ICE in ipa-devirt.c
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67289-4-FDKhvXfrMO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02916.txt.bz2
Content-length: 336
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am reducing testcase. BTW it seems wasteful to build all the dwarfs we are
going to throw away for slim LTO -g. Can't we just disable the dwarf production
at slim LTO build time until early dwarf materializes?
>From gcc-bugs-return-503990-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:43:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503990-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115589 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:43:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114493 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:43:05 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-jdy73LhUKu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02917.txt.bz2
Content-length: 486
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Interesting, I hit number of other ICEs before getting to final build. I have
old firefox tree however.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503991-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:44:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503991-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119762 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:44:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119176 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:44:32 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68453] [6 Regression] graphite ICE: segfault
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68453-4-kk7LuNUAwz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02918.txt.bz2
Content-length: 335
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
at r230923 this testcase seems not to fail anymore. Should this be closed as
fixed (maybe after adding the testcase ?)
I ran into a new ICE however, but I'll open a PR once I have this reduced.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503992-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:48:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503992-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7264 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:48:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7219 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:48:54 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-1KMgbSt6FX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02919.txt.bz2
Content-length: 242
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
My Firofox tree is quite old, too: Oct 15 2014
But it is good enough as a guinea pig for finding compiler bugs...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503993-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:50:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503993-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11325 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:50:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11285 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 08:50:42 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68550] New: [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error: missing PHI def
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02920.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3080
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Bug ID: 68550
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error:
missing PHI def
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
graphite-triggered ICE in current trunk.
> cat bug.f90
SUBROUTINE integrate_core_1(grid,coef_xyz,pol_x,pol_y,&
pol_z,map,sphere_bounds,cmax,gridbounds)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: sphere_bounds(*), cmax, &
map(-cmax:cmax,1:3), &
gridbounds(2,3)
REAL(dp), INTENT(IN) :: grid(gridbounds(1,1):gridbounds(2,1), &
gridbounds(1,2):gridbounds(2,2),&
gridbounds(1,3):gridbounds(2,3))
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: lp = 1
REAL(dp), INTENT(IN) :: pol_x(0:lp,-cmax:cmax), &
pol_y(1:2,0:lp,-cmax:0), &
pol_z(1:2,0:lp,-cmax:0)
REAL(dp), INTENT(OUT) :: coef_xyz(((lp+1)*(lp+2)*(lp+3))/6)
INTEGER :: i, ig, igmax, igmin, j, j2, &
jg, jg2, jgmin, k, k2, kg, &
kg2, kgmin, lxp, sci
REAL(dp) :: coef_x(4,0:lp), &
coef_xy(2,((lp+1)*(lp+2))/2), &
s(4)
DO kg=kgmin,0
DO jg=jgmin,0
coef_x=0.0_dp
DO ig=igmin,igmax
DO lxp=0,lp
coef_x(:,lxp)=coef_x(:,lxp)+s(:)*pol_x(lxp,ig)
ENDDO
END DO
coef_xy(:,3)=coef_xy(:,3)+coef_x(3:4,0)*pol_y(2,1,jg)
END DO
coef_xyz(3)=coef_xyz(3)+coef_xy(1,3)*pol_z(1,0,kg)
END DO
END SUBROUTINE integrate_core_1
> gfortran -c -O2 -floop-nest-optimize bug.f90
bug.f90:1:0:
SUBROUTINE integrate_core_1(grid,coef_xyz,pol_x,pol_y,&
Error: missing PHI def
bug.f90:1:0: Error: missing PHI def
prephitmp_133 = PHI <(8), (16)>
bug.f90:1:0: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
0xbab969 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:5082
0xa92b8c execute_function_todo
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1958
0xa9361b execute_todo
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:2010
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151126 (experimental) [trunk revision 230923] (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-503994-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:53:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503994-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35637 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:53:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35605 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 08:53:41 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/67289] ICE in ipa-devirt.c
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67289-4-7rS82da2GH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02921.txt.bz2
Content-length: 616
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I am reducing testcase. BTW it seems wasteful to build all the dwarfs we are
> going to throw away for slim LTO -g. Can't we just disable the dwarf production
> at slim LTO build time until early dwarf materializes?
You could do that by adjusting debug hooks to the _none variants for
slim LTO.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503995-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 08:56:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503995-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51873 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 08:56:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47524 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 08:56:30 -0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-8mW19o4M1o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02922.txt.bz2
Content-length: 326
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
I've filed bug
23669324 Xcode 7 as creates relocation ld cannot handle
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-503996-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:09:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503996-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77922 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:09:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77669 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 09:09:24 -0000
From: "aurelien at aurel32 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aurelien at aurel32 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68302-4-zPbtmg76GH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02923.txt.bz2
Content-length: 696
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net> ---
I built GCC with the following options:
configure --enable-languages=c --prefix=/usr --target=mipsel-linux-gnu
--includedir=/usr/mipsel-linux-gnu/include
Then I build the file with -O2 -g -o test.o -c test.c -march=mips32r2.
The ICE disappears when I don't use -g.
All that said, I am still able to reproduce the issue with the gcc-5-branch,
but not with trunk. I start to wonder if I correctly tested trunk or if the
problem has been fixed in the meantime. Anyway if it's not reproducible with
trunk, that's something that can be bisected. I'll do that.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503997-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:11:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503997-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80220 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:11:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80165 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 09:11:37 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68550] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error: missing PHI def
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68550-4-n2V0dWToAC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02924.txt.bz2
Content-length: 477
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-503998-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:12:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503998-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81403 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:12:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81343 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 09:12:48 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cc component version target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-epoQB1OLZH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02925.txt.bz2
Content-length: 674
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |lto
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|lto |tree-optimization
Version|lto |6.0
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Heh, at least I hoped that the checking code would find sth...
>From gcc-bugs-return-503999-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:17:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-503999-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13361 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:17:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13287 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 09:16:56 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-88tSAFZmlZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02926.txt.bz2
Content-length: 572
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #31 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #30)
> With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
>
> I've filed bug
>
> 23669324 Xcode 7 as creates relocation ld cannot handle
Thanks!
The .s file in your attachment crashes TOT llvm/clang (clang -target
i686-apple-darwin12 xxxx.s -o t.o ) with an assertion "Value does not fit in
Fixup field". Will try to investigate if I have any spare cycles today.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504000-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:53:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504000-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44305 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:53:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44246 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 09:53:20 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-DmPTp4jdtv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02927.txt.bz2
Content-length: 944
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 09:52:48 2015
New Revision: 230928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68508
* cp-tree.h (cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_downcast): Add INTYPE argument.
* cp-ubsan.c (cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_downcast): Likewise. Use
it instead of or in addition to TREE_TYPE (op). Use
is_properly_derived_from, return NULL_TREE if TREE_TYPE (intype) and
TREE_TYPE (type) are the same type minus qualifiers.
* typeck.c (build_static_cast_1): Adjust callers.
* g++.dg/ubsan/pr68508.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr68508.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-ubsan.c
trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504001-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:56:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504001-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51198 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:56:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50886 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 09:56:04 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67239-4-EJv0xDSZwC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67239-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67239-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02928.txt.bz2
Content-length: 519
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ABI
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thus not mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504002-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 09:59:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504002-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56875 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 09:59:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56823 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 09:59:00 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67226-4-zyw7jb6Ps7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02929.txt.bz2
Content-length: 938
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 26 09:58:28 2015
New Revision: 230929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[calls.c] PR rtl-optimization/67226: Take into account pretend_args_size when
checking stack offsets for sibcall optimisation
2015-11-26 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/67226
* calls.c (store_one_arg): Take into account
crtl->args.pretend_args_size when checking for overlap between
arg->value and argblock + arg->locate.offset during sibcall
optimization.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67226.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67226.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/calls.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504003-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:00:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504003-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70771 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:00:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70707 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:00:41 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-67226-4-R5SD9w1LoQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02930.txt.bz2
Content-length: 496
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.5
Known to fail| |4.9.4
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk.
This occurs on 4.9 as well (and earlier too from what I can tell).
I'm testing the backports
>From gcc-bugs-return-504004-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:02:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504004-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77918 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:02:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77827 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:02:05 -0000
From: "schwab@linux-m68k.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67876] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: schwab@linux-m68k.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67876-4-L2DwigTmvL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02931.txt.bz2
Content-length: 776
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
FAIL: g++.dg/pr67876.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:23:8: error:
redefinition of 'struct S<T, F>'
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:7:8: error: previous
definition of 'struct S<T, F>'
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:28:6: error:
redefinition of 'template<class T, void (& F)(T*)> void bar(S<T, F>&)'
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:30:13: error:
redefinition of 'S<int, foo> s'
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:32:6: error:
redefinition of 'void foobar(S<int, foo>&)'
>From gcc-bugs-return-504005-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:19:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504005-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80104 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:19:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79998 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 10:19:24 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68128] A huge regression in Parboil v2.5 OpenMP CUTCP test (2.5 times lower performance)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68128-4-hZMqfEoSeS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68128-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68128-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02932.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2656
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 10:18:50 2015
New Revision: 230932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68128
* tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED_READONLY): Define.
* gimplify.c: Include gimple-walk.h.
(enum gimplify_omp_var_data): Add GOVD_WRITTEN.
(omp_notice_variable): Set flags to n->value if n already
exists in target region, but we need to jump to do_outer.
(omp_shared_to_firstprivate_optimizable_decl_p,
omp_mark_stores, omp_find_stores_op, omp_find_stores_stmt): New
functions.
(gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1): Set OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED_READONLY
on OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED if it is a scalar non-addressable that is
not modified in the body. Call omp_mark_stores for outer
contexts on OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED clauses if they could be written
in the body or on OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE.
(gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses): Add body argument, call
omp_find_stores_{stmt,op} on the body through walk_gimple_seq.
Set OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED_READONLY
on OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED if it is a scalar non-addressable that is
not modified in the body. Call omp_mark_stores for outer
contexts on OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED clauses if they could be written
in the body or on OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE or on OMP_CLAUSE_LINEAR
without OMP_CLAUSE_LINEAR_NO_COPYOUT or on OMP_CLAUSE_REDUCTION.
(gimplify_oacc_cache, gimplify_omp_parallel, gimplify_omp_task,
gimplify_omp_for, gimplify_omp_workshare, gimplify_omp_target_update,
gimplify_expr): Adjust gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses callers.
* tree-nested.c (convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses,
convert_local_omp_clauses): Clear OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED_READONLY on
non-local vars or local vars referenced from nested routines.
* omp-low.c (scan_sharing_clauses): For OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED_READONLY
attempt to optimize it into OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE. Even for
TREE_READONLY, don't call use_pointer_for_field with non-NULL
second argument until we are sure we are keeping OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED.
* gcc.dg/gomp/pr68128-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/gomp/pr68128-2.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/pr68128-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/pr68128-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/gimplify.c
trunk/gcc/omp-low.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-nested.c
trunk/gcc/tree.h
>From gcc-bugs-return-504006-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:20:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504006-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 117264 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:20:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113101 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:20:38 -0000
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-1XUQumgaYO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02933.txt.bz2
Content-length: 601
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 36843
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36843&action=edit
gzipped C source code
Might be a simpler test case.
Found on gcc trunk dated 20151126. Compiler flag -O3 required.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504007-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:22:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504007-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119351 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:22:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119311 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:22:02 -0000
From: "tan.dejun.alvin at dhs dot sg" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68551] New: GCC 5.2 build broken on arm/rasbian
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tan.dejun.alvin at dhs dot sg
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02934.txt.bz2
Content-length: 504
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
Bug ID: 68551
Summary: GCC 5.2 build broken on arm/rasbian
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tan.dejun.alvin at dhs dot sg
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling OpenWRT on my raspberry pi throws me this error:
http://pastebin.com/5aXUjKVR
>From gcc-bugs-return-504008-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:22:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504008-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120254 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:22:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 120171 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 10:22:14 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-cmTij5JQmC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02935.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1040
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 10:21:42 2015
New Revision: 230933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68508
* cp-tree.h (cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_downcast): Add INTYPE argument.
* cp-ubsan.c (cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_downcast): Likewise. Use
it instead of or in addition to TREE_TYPE (op). Use
is_properly_derived_from, return NULL_TREE if TREE_TYPE (intype) and
TREE_TYPE (type) are the same type minus qualifiers.
* typeck.c (build_static_cast_1): Adjust callers.
* g++.dg/ubsan/pr68508.C: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr68508.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/cp-ubsan.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cp/typeck.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504009-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:24:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504009-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124476 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:24:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124403 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:24:18 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68551] GCC 5.2 build broken on arm/rasbian
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68551-4-dRIqqFIO7H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02936.txt.bz2
Content-length: 501
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you please provide a preprocessed testcase and, the gcc configure options
and the compilation command line as per:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
>From gcc-bugs-return-504010-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:24:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504010-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125271 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:24:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125164 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:24:31 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67313] [6 Regression] ICE: in vague_linkage_p, at cp/decl2.c:1878 with -fno-weak and variadic template
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67313-4-J0TjsHFDyt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02937.txt.bz2
Content-length: 194
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67313
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
This is already fixed, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504011-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:26:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504011-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49265 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:26:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49200 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:26:43 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68508] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error with parentheses around return value in C++14 with ASan enabled
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68508-4-qAmLONhcac@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02938.txt.bz2
Content-length: 432
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 5.3+.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504012-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:26:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504012-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49986 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:26:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49909 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:26:53 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68551] GCC 5.2 build broken on arm/rasbian
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68551-4-KB1zglZfZk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02939.txt.bz2
Content-length: 623
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note the error is from the installed host cross-compiler which we'd need
version
info for. Not sure why you build a native GCC for raspi though.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504014-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:38:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504014-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92140 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:38:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91759 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:38:36 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67313] [6 Regression] ICE: in vague_linkage_p, at cp/decl2.c:1878 with -fno-weak and variadic template
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67313-4-TbIyKBX8qL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02941.txt.bz2
Content-length: 436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67313
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Done.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504013-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:38:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504013-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90533 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:38:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90432 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 10:38:05 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67313] [6 Regression] ICE: in vague_linkage_p, at cp/decl2.c:1878 with -fno-weak and variadic template
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67313-4-fXalkRuwPt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02940.txt.bz2
Content-length: 486
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67313
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 26 10:37:33 2015
New Revision: 230934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/67313
* g++.dg/cpp0x/no-weak1.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/no-weak1.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504015-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:46:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504015-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98462 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:46:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98404 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:46:24 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-JleEeGJC98@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02942.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1620
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's a different cause though as it is from rtl_loop_init checking for
the case LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP is not set. Thus a pass preceeding isn't
updating loop->latch.
I think that was by design (LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES was supposed
to be "->latch doesn't matter, only keep header correct" which is what
we require from passes not having initialized loops).
Of course that's a somewhat conflicting requirement and thus the cleanest
approach would be to split the latch flags even more. LOOPS_HAVE_LATCHES
(otherwise ->latch cannot be relied on), LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES
(->latch may be NULL and do not disambiguate such loops),
~LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES (disambiguate, all loops have ->latch
non-NULL), LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES (latches are forwarders).
The current state is really broken though in case we have
LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES users that rely on ->latch reflecting
reality. The flag is not explicitely requested by any pass though
so a simple option would be to revert the checking bits for now
and revisit the whole issue in stage1.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504016-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 10:56:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504016-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30430 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 10:56:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26324 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 10:56:19 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-j5tYncVVtk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02943.txt.bz2
Content-length: 439
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Rough reduction:
a;
fn1() {
int b = 0;
char *c;
unsigned d, e = &d;
for (; a; a++)
if (*c) {
char **f = &c;
lbl72855FC2:
c = b > (**f = c && b);
d = 2;
lbl4BD212AD:
for (; d; d++)
;
goto lbl72855FC2;
}
c = &b;
goto lbl4BD212AD;
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-504017-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:07:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504017-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102285 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:07:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102254 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:07:45 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67249] [concepts] ICE parsing f(pair<auto, concept>)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67249-4-qFkf2nG1uj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02944.txt.bz2
Content-length: 194
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
This is already fixed. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504018-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:32:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504018-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60595 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:32:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60269 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:32:11 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61034] Optimizing takes too many passes
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61034-4-fvLd7uQXF6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61034-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61034-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02945.txt.bz2
Content-length: 813
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We arrive at different final optimizations depending on PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED
(see PR67203). Current (GCC 6) final state is either 3 or 4 calls depending
on that. And this is only because the final DCE (which removes malloc/free
pairs) needs some more DSE (which only follows DCE). The late dce/dse
passes are the only ones with this particular odering, all other pairs
come the other way around which would end up removing all malloc/free pairs
in this (finally).
Of course DSE and DCE depend on each other so exchanging the last two
isn't a trivial surgery. Ideally DSE would have at least a basic
DCE embedded or we'd finally merge both passes (given that DSE is quite
ad-hoc anyway).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504019-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:37:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504019-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67188 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:37:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67146 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:37:12 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67226-4-1fbTAmqxJl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02946.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1049
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:36:40 2015
New Revision: 230936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230936&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[calls.c] PR rtl-optimization/67226: Take into account pretend_args_size when
checking stack offsets for sibcall optimisation
Backport from mainline
2015-11-26 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/67226
* calls.c (store_one_arg): Take into account
crtl->args.pretend_args_size when checking for overlap between
arg->value and argblock + arg->locate.offset during sibcall
optimization.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67226.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67226.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/calls.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504020-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:40:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504020-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78719 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:40:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78676 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:40:48 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67226-4-edgiHpOq1o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02947.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1057
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:40:16 2015
New Revision: 230937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[calls.c] PR rtl-optimization/67226: Take into account pretend_args_size when
checking stack offsets for sibcall optimisation
Backport from mainline
2015-11-26 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/67226
* calls.c (store_one_arg): Take into account
crtl->args.pretend_args_size when checking for overlap between
arg->value and argblock + arg->locate.offset during sibcall
optimization.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67226.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67226.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/calls.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504021-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:41:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504021-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79915 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:41:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79780 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:41:28 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67226-4-hOLefHG7Zg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02948.txt.bz2
Content-length: 420
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on all active branches
>From gcc-bugs-return-504022-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:41:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504022-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80210 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:41:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79839 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:41:30 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-65358-4-g8YCCv9l3c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02949.txt.bz2
Content-length: 544
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
Bug 65358 depends on bug 67226, which changed state.
Bug 67226 Summary: Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-504023-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:48:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504023-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88726 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:48:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88619 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:48:04 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68416] [MPX] GCC emits a lot of redundant bndmov instructions
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68416-4-nBjj8RCCuL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02950.txt.bz2
Content-length: 718
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3)
> The first I thought it is a LRA inheritance bug but after more thorough
> analysis I found that the problem comes from IRA. IRA never assigns BND
> hard registers to pseudos because it never assigns BNDREGS class to pseudos.
> After some investigation I found that ALL_REGS does not contain BNDREGS.
> IRA starts with ALL_REGS and uses narrow reg class if the mode is prohibited
> for some hard registers. That is why class BNDREGS is never used for
> pseudos.
Thanks a lot for the patch! It significantly improves MPX code quality.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504024-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:49:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504024-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92713 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:49:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92286 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:49:52 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68416] [MPX] GCC emits a lot of redundant bndmov instructions
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68416-4-5aet9UOo0H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02951.txt.bz2
Content-length: 747
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:49:20 2015
New Revision: 230938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-11-26 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR target/68416
* config/i386/i386.h (enum reg_class): Add
bounds registers to ALL_REGS.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-11-26 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
PR target/68416
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68416.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68416.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504025-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:52:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504025-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98376 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:52:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98264 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:52:43 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68249] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68249-4-gNapjDoPvr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02952.txt.bz2
Content-length: 597
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:52:11 2015
New Revision: 230939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504026-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:52:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504026-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98534 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:52:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98267 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:52:43 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68321-4-2E4sLVLP4n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02953.txt.bz2
Content-length: 597
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:52:11 2015
New Revision: 230939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504028-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:53:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504028-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108453 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:53:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107888 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:53:51 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/67203] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times fre2 "free" 10
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67203-4-nX969epwjw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67203-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67203-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02955.txt.bz2
Content-length: 455
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67203
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by adjusting the testcase.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504027-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:53:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504027-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107813 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:53:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107328 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:53:46 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/67203] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times fre2 "free" 10
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67203-4-nqxsWb2UI7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67203-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67203-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02954.txt.bz2
Content-length: 624
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67203
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:53:13 2015
New Revision: 230940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR testsuite/67203
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C: Make expected optimization result
dependent on PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED. Drop optimization level and
also monitor final optimization result.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C
>From gcc-bugs-return-504030-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:54:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504030-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111976 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:54:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111912 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:54:54 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-xFwS8GE8Xb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02957.txt.bz2
Content-length: 464
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixing.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504029-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:54:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504029-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111218 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:54:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111176 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:54:28 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-5tDlafBuwu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02956.txt.bz2
Content-length: 615
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Curious to know under what circumstances you ran into this?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504032-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:55:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504032-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114267 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:55:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113598 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:55:46 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68249] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68249-4-KQmjpodNt1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02959.txt.bz2
Content-length: 645
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:55:14 2015
New Revision: 230941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504031-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:55:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504031-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113686 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:55:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113601 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 11:55:46 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68321-4-ABzzSFO63d@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02958.txt.bz2
Content-length: 645
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:55:14 2015
New Revision: 230941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c: New test.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68249.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68321.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504034-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:58:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504034-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126191 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125952 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:05 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-buyowkxxng@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02961.txt.bz2
Content-length: 182
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504033-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:58:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504033-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126027 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125908 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:03 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68321-4-BylMez3Tt7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02960.txt.bz2
Content-length: 561
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68194 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504035-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:58:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504035-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127604 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127506 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:33 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68249] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68249-4-2fuUlFz2YD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02962.txt.bz2
Content-length: 487
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68194 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504036-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 11:58:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504036-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127682 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127543 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 11:58:34 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-svDrUUv9t3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02963.txt.bz2
Content-length: 182
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504037-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:05:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504037-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7076 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:05:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6609 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 12:05:22 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-b8H5HlOfsL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02964.txt.bz2
Content-length: 486
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 26 12:04:50 2015
New Revision: 230942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68527
* c-ada-spec.c (dump_nested_types): Add guard for error_mark_node.
(print_ada_struct_decl): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504038-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:06:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504038-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9003 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:06:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8945 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:06:51 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-wFIJCfRpuc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02965.txt.bz2
Content-length: 536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed (but please avoid throwing junk at -fdump-ada-spec).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504039-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:09:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504039-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10811 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:09:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10710 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:09:20 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-l00N8ebLMh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02966.txt.bz2
Content-length: 644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
reduced testcase:
.text
.align 4,0x90
.globl _choose_tmpdir
_choose_tmpdir:
sbbl $3+_vartmp, %esi
ret
.space 254
.const
.align 2
_vartmp:
.byte 47
===
It seems that the reloc length is expected to be 1 (which will not, indeed,
accommodate the offset).
cctools (877.5) using -Q and my local port of GAS both produce;
address pcrel length extern type scattered symbolnum/value
00000002 False long n/a VANILLA True 0x00000108
>From gcc-bugs-return-504040-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:11:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504040-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22858 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:11:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22789 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:11:51 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/66799] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status component
Message-ID: <bug-66799-4-6sJyPYSi1P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02967.txt.bz2
Content-length: 957
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, sorry for responding so late. The testcase has aligned accesses only
and we now might be able to propagate simply via IPA alignment propagation.
Not sure why it started to "work" in the revision range but the vectorizer
indeed analyzes all accesses to be aligned.
I think fixing the testcase is best (not align the source array) as only
that triggers a runtime error if we get things wrong (and miss the
versioning check). The testcase was made to align that array with r104445
but I don't see a good reason for this today.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504041-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:12:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504041-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24403 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:12:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24375 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:12:45 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] New: [6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02968.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2313
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Bug ID: 68552
Summary: [6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2
-ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: alpha-linux-gnu
Recent regression on alpha-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr52255.c -O3
This ICE can be triggered with a crosscompiler to alpha-linux-gnu with '-O2
-ftree-vectorize':
Starting program: /home/uros/gcc-build-alpha/gcc/cc1 -O2 -ftree-vectorize
-quiet -fpreprocessed pr52255.c
Breakpoint 1, internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a0c4c "in %s, at %s:%d") at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1255
1255 internal_error (const char *gmsgid, ...)
(gdb) bt
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a0c4c "in %s, at %s:%d") at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1255
#1 0x00000000010bf6cc in fancy_abort (file=<optimized out>, line=9260,
function=0x1185a40 <expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*,
machine_mode, expand_modifier)::__FUNCTION__> "expand_expr_real_2")
at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1332
#2 0x0000000000790930 in expand_expr_real_2 (ops=0x7fffffffbdb0,
target=<optimized out>, tmode=<optimized out>, modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL)
at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/expr.c:9260
#3 0x0000000000685b5f in expand_gimple_stmt_1 (stmt=0x2aaaae88e300) at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3628
#4 0x0000000000685e87 in expand_gimple_stmt (stmt=0x2aaaae88e300) at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3688
(gdb) f 2
#2 0x0000000000790930 in expand_expr_real_2 (ops=0x7fffffffbdb0,
target=<optimized out>, tmode=<optimized out>, modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL)
at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/expr.c:9260
9260 gcc_assert (temp);
(gdb) list
9255 }
9256 else
9257 gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (op2)) ==
MODE_VECTOR_INT);
9258
9259 temp = expand_vec_perm (mode, op0, op1, op2, target);
9260 gcc_assert (temp);
9261 return temp;
9262
9263 case DOT_PROD_EXPR:
9264 {
>From gcc-bugs-return-504043-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:16:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504043-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50669 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:16:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50503 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 12:16:15 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/66799] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66799-4-TEkVl48KCC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02970.txt.bz2
Content-length: 556
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 12:15:43 2015
New Revision: 230943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230943&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR testsuite/66799
* gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c (main): Do not align Kernel, do not
vectorize init loop and adjust expected outcome.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504042-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:16:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504042-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49731 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49427 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:15:57 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/66799] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66799-4-92OX6kUaxb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02969.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504044-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:19:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504044-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68985 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:19:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68332 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:19:46 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66678] loop counter not accurately described by vrp
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-66678-4-fWQ8tzDoVh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66678-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66678-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02971.txt.bz2
Content-length: 610
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|minor |enhancement
>From gcc-bugs-return-504045-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:23:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504045-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74714 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:23:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74665 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:23:26 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66598] [4.9/5 Regression] With -O3 gcc incorrectly assumes aligned SSE instructions (e.g. movapd) can be used
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work target_milestone short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-66598-4-DJlWEBdeNp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02972.txt.bz2
Content-length: 649
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |4.8.5
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
Summary|With -O3 gcc incorrectly |[4.9/5 Regression] With -O3
|assumes aligned SSE |gcc incorrectly assumes
|instructions (e.g. movapd) |aligned SSE instructions
|can be used |(e.g. movapd) can be used
>From gcc-bugs-return-504046-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:27:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504046-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78263 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:27:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78238 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:27:30 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66379] SCCVN doesn't handle aggregate array element accesses very well
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-66379-4-aPo576vBVT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02973.txt.bz2
Content-length: 628
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Works now with -fno-tree-sra as the patch was committed but SRA still confuses
FRE so this is a testcase for the "stupid address-forwarding" issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504047-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:29:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504047-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81323 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:29:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81199 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 12:29:30 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68416] [MPX] GCC emits a lot of redundant bndmov instructions
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68416-4-r3k7ZujTqF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02974.txt.bz2
Content-length: 907
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Nov 26 12:28:57 2015
New Revision: 230945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r230938.
2015-11-26 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR target/68416
* config/i386/i386.h (enum reg_class): Add
bounds registers to ALL_REGS.
gcc/testsuite/
Backport from mainline r230938.
2015-11-26 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
PR target/68416
* gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68416.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr68416.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504048-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:34:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504048-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99933 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:34:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99758 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:34:03 -0000
From: "ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68416] [MPX] GCC emits a lot of redundant bndmov instructions
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68416-4-r0xh1eEutf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68416-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02975.txt.bz2
Content-length: 430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed
>From gcc-bugs-return-504049-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 12:54:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504049-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37348 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 12:54:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37297 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 12:54:49 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66598] [4.9/5 Regression] With -O3 gcc incorrectly assumes aligned SSE instructions (e.g. movapd) can be used
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66598-4-kiwHcwg8CI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02976.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2132
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The relevant hunk is the following but as it requires us to know the
final vectorization factor it requires us to re-order (and split)
the pipeline quite a bit. r223670 has bits of the prerequesites but not all
and r224598 has the fix below (and some unrelated bits).
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 230924)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (working copy)
@@ -701,21 +701,22 @@ vect_compute_data_ref_alignment (struct
}
}
- /* Similarly, if we're doing basic-block vectorization, we can only use
- base and misalignment information relative to an innermost loop if the
- misalignment stays the same throughout the execution of the loop.
- As above, this is the case if the stride of the dataref evenly divides
- by the vector size. */
- if (!loop)
+ /* Similarly we can only use base and misalignment information relative to
+ an innermost loop if the misalignment stays the same throughout the
+ execution of the loop. As above, this is the case if the stride of
+ the dataref evenly divides by the vector size. */
+ else
{
tree step = DR_STEP (dr);
- HOST_WIDE_INT dr_step = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (step);
+ unsigned vf = loop ? LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo) : 1;
- if (dr_step % GET_MODE_SIZE (TYPE_MODE (vectype)) != 0)
+ if (tree_fits_shwi_p (step)
+ && ((tree_to_shwi (step) * vf)
+ % GET_MODE_SIZE (TYPE_MODE (vectype)) != 0))
{
if (dump_enabled_p ())
dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
- "SLP: step doesn't divide the vector-size.\n");
+ "step doesn't divide the vector-size.\n");
misalign = NULL_TREE;
}
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-504050-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:07:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504050-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94297 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:07:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93988 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:07:28 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68553] New: gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget cf_gccbuild attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02977.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Bug ID: 68553
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Created attachment 36844
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36844&action=edit
pr68445.c.134t.vect
The new gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c testcase FAILs on Solaris/SPARC
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect
"vectorizing stmts using SLP"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP"
for both 32 and 64-bit.
I'm attaching the dump.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-504051-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:07:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504051-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95123 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:07:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95027 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:07:42 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68553] gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68553-4-7WvNlCHRzq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02978.txt.bz2
Content-length: 285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504052-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:12:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504052-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59232 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:12:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59181 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:12:52 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68554] New: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget cf_gccbuild attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02979.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1328
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Bug ID: 68554
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: alan.lawrence at arm dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Created attachment 36845
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36845&action=edit
bb-slp-subgroups-2.c.144t.slp2
The new gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c testcase FAILs on Solaris/SPARC
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "Basic block will be vectorized using SLP" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "basic block vectorized" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "Basic block
will be vectorized using SLP" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "basic block
vectorized" 1
for both 32- and 64-bit.
I'm attaching the dump.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-504053-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:13:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504053-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61142 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:13:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61095 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:13:21 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68554] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68554-4-d0qvKT0d4m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02980.txt.bz2
Content-length: 285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504054-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:15:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504054-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63796 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:15:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63747 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 13:15:18 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67249] [concepts] ICE parsing f(pair<auto, concept>)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67249-4-D3jpdTjmUA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02981.txt.bz2
Content-length: 490
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:14:45 2015
New Revision: 230947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/67249
* g++.dg/concepts/pr67249.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr67249.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504055-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:15:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504055-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64707 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:15:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64603 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:15:46 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67249] [concepts] ICE parsing f(pair<auto, concept>)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-67249-4-WniIC0j4bY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67249-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02982.txt.bz2
Content-length: 489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Done.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504056-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:15:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504056-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64925 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:15:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64643 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:15:47 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67491-4-W588WslmRP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67491-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67491-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02983.txt.bz2
Content-length: 471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67249, which changed state.
Bug 67249 Summary: [concepts] ICE parsing f(pair<auto, concept>)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-504057-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:17:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504057-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76830 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:17:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76784 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:17:15 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66598] [4.9/5 Regression] With -O3 gcc incorrectly assumes aligned SSE instructions (e.g. movapd) can be used
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66598-4-ImjO99NJn1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02984.txt.bz2
Content-length: 148
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh, and it needs r223798.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504059-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:20:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504059-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87946 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:20:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87918 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:20:50 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68555] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68555-4-QsFMJ2B2VG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02986.txt.bz2
Content-length: 285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504058-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:20:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504058-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87189 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:20:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87118 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:20:29 -0000
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68555] New: [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget cf_gccbuild attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02985.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1064
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Bug ID: 68555
Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Created attachment 36846
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36846&action=edit
bb-slp-10.c.144t.slp2
Between 20151111 (r230155) and 20151113 (r230309), the gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c
testcase started to FAIL on Solaris/SPARC, both 32 and 64-bit:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump slp2
"unsupported alignment in basic block."
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "unsupported alignment in
basic block."
I'm attaching the dump.
Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-504060-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:25:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504060-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105128 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:25:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105039 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:25:34 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68556] New: [6 Regression] -r -flto test failures
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02987.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1336
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556
Bug ID: 68556
Summary: [6 Regression] -r -flto test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
On Linux/x86, r230922 gave
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081118 cp_lto_20081118_0.o-cp_lto_20081118_1.o link, -fPIC
-flto -flto-partition=1to1 -r -nostdlib (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081204-1 cp_lto_20081204-1_0.o-cp_lto_20081204-1_1.o link,
-flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fPIC -r -nostdlib (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20081219 cp_lto_20081219_0.o-cp_lto_20081219_1.o link, -fPIC
-flto -flto-partition=1to1 -O2 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090302 cp_lto_20090302_0.o-cp_lto_20090302_1.o link, -fPIC
-flto -flto-partition=1to1 -r -nostdlib (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20091002-1 cp_lto_20091002-1_0.o-cp_lto_20091002-1_0.o link,
-fPIC -flto (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65193 cp_lto_pr65193_0.o-cp_lto_pr65193_0.o link, -fPIC -r
-nostdlib -flto -O2 -g (internal compiler error)
r230910 is OK.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504061-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:28:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504061-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108400 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:28:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 108292 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:28:24 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68556] [6 Regression] -r -flto test failures
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68556-4-4T1QF7vv6y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02988.txt.bz2
Content-length: 528
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
r230915 is bad.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504062-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:35:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504062-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129003 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:35:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128934 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:35:04 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-00dzlkLK3J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02989.txt.bz2
Content-length: 999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Caused by r230797:
2015-11-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/68483
* tree-vect-generic.c (lower_vec_perm): If VEC_PERM_EXPR
is valid vec_shr pattern, don't lower it even if can_vec_perm_p
returns false.
* optabs.c (shift_amt_for_vec_perm_mask): Return NULL_RTX
whenever first is nelt or above. Don't mask expected with
2 * nelt - 1.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504063-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:45:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504063-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49617 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:45:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49543 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:45:20 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68553] gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68553-4-6mI1zcPkYD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02990.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c:7:3: note: Load
permutation 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c:7:3: note: no
vect permute for _13 = *p1f_35;
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c:7:3: note:
Build SLP failed: unsupported load permutation *destf_33 = _13;
and then
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c:7:3: note:
extract even/odd not supported by target
so it hits the missed "optimization" of simply omitting a 1:1 permutation.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504065-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:47:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504065-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54334 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:47:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54263 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:47:22 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/67323] Use non-unit stride loads by preference when applicable
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67323-4-LYmxNqu1q1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67323-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67323-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02992.txt.bz2
Content-length: 472
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
Bug 67323 depends on bug 66721, which changed state.
Bug 66721 Summary: [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-504066-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:47:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504066-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55431 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:47:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55069 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 13:47:31 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66721] [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66721-4-yCHmP65m58@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02993.txt.bz2
Content-length: 619
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:46:59 2015
New Revision: 230956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/66721
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_2): Compute scalar
iteration cost earlier. Re-do analysis without SLP when
vectorization using SLP fails and without has a chance to succeed.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504064-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:47:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504064-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54326 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:47:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54241 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:47:22 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66721] [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66721-4-4AdMDu9eyW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66721-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02991.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504067-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:49:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504067-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59130 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:49:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59066 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:49:55 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68554] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68554-4-edaSpRnTy4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02994.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1117
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c:20:1:
note: Load permutation 3 0 2 1
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c:20:1:
note: no vect permute for _13 = b[3];
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c:20:1:
note: unsupported load permutation
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c:20:1:
note: Build SLP failed: unsupported load permutation a[4] = _14;
The testcase needs vect_perm effective target
>From gcc-bugs-return-504068-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:51:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504068-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74897 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:51:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74839 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:51:44 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68554] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68554-4-9L5rw0G7s6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02995.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504069-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:52:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504069-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77655 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:52:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77004 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 13:52:13 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68554] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68554-4-wzoeHFChpo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02996.txt.bz2
Content-length: 505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:51:40 2015
New Revision: 230961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR testsuite/68554
* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c: Require vect_perm.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504070-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:55:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504070-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119315 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:55:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119261 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:55:44 -0000
From: "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-lkGSAIfoGY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02997.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1787
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here's another testcase, reduced from value.c in gdb - ICEs at -O2 on (at
least) x86_64 and AArch64:
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
extern void *xmalloc (size_t) __attribute__ ((__malloc__)) __attribute__
((__returns_nonnull__));
struct __jmp_buf_tag
{
};
extern int __sigsetjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag __env[1], int __savemask)
__attribute__ ((__nothrow__));
typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag sigjmp_buf[1];
extern sigjmp_buf *exceptions_state_mc_init (void);
extern int exceptions_state_mc_action_iter (void);
extern void printf_unfiltered (const char *, ...)
;
extern struct gdbarch *get_current_arch (void);
struct internalvar
{
struct internalvar *next;
};
static struct internalvar *internalvars;
struct internalvar *
create_internalvar (const char *name)
{
struct internalvar *var = ((struct internalvar *) xmalloc (sizeof (struct
internalvar)));
internalvars = var;
}
void
show_convenience ()
{
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_current_arch ();
int varseen = 0;
for (struct internalvar *var = internalvars; var; var = var->next)
{
if (!varseen)
varseen = 1;
sigjmp_buf *buf = exceptions_state_mc_init ();
__sigsetjmp ( (*buf), 1);
while (exceptions_state_mc_action_iter ())
while (exceptions_state_mc_action_iter ())
;
}
if (!varseen)
printf_unfiltered ( "" );
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-504071-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 13:59:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504071-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127188 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 13:59:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127146 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 13:59:31 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68555] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68555-4-h0SJBsL4vB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02998.txt.bz2
Content-length: 891
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, that's expected now after my re-orgs
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c:30:6: note:
not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store.MEM[(unsigned int *)&out + 4B]
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c:30:6: note:
not vectorized: bad data alignment in basic block.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504072-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:00:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504072-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129926 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:00:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 128865 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:00:40 -0000
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68557] New: Missed x86 peephole optimization for multiplying by a bool
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg02999.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1036
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Bug ID: 68557
Summary: Missed x86 peephole optimization for multiplying by a
bool
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
On x86 the following code
void bar (int x);
void
baz (int x, bool b)
{
bar (x * b);
}
is compiled to
bar:
movzbl %sil, %esi
imull %esi, %edi
jmp baz
when it could instead be compiled to
bar:
movzbl %sil, %esi
negl %esi
andl %esi, %edi
jmp baz
On modern processors the "neg" and "and" instructions takes a minimum of one
cycle each, whereas the "imul" instruction takes a minimum three cycles. So
transforming "x * (int)b" to "x & -(int)b" would save one cycle in the best
case.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504073-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:02:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504073-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2923 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:02:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2865 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 14:01:58 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68555] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68555-4-bfs7EZ5KZl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03000.txt.bz2
Content-length: 527
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:01:26 2015
New Revision: 230963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR testsuite/68555
* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c: Adjust pattern, use target selector
and not XFAIL.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504074-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:08:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504074-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30128 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:08:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30064 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 14:08:29 -0000
From: "edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67037] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above on ARM
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67037-4-OknB457pSs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67037-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67037-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03001.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1010
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger <edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:07:55 2015
New Revision: 230964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230964&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Backport from mainline
2015-09-30 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
PR rtl-optimization/67037
* lra-constraints.c (process_addr_reg): Use copy_rtx when necessary.
testsuite:
2015-11-26 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Backport from mainline
2015-09-30 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
PR rtl-optimization/67037
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67037.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr67037.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/lra-constraints.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504075-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:12:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504075-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52076 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:12:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52026 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:12:35 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68555] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68555-4-fMHxLl73i3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03002.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504076-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:21:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504076-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 87206 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:21:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86777 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:21:26 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66238] C/Fortran interoperability broken with -flto
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66238-4-exyc938Tpr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03003.txt.bz2
Content-length: 517
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66238
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
This PR has been fixed between revisions r230847 (FAIL) and r230925 (PASS),
closing.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504078-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:44:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504078-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36925 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:44:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36883 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:44:28 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68558] Fails to SLP loop
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68558-4-N7XcnObYVg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03005.txt.bz2
Content-length: 569
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504077-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:44:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504077-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36196 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:44:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36145 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:44:15 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68558] New: Fails to SLP loop
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter blocked target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03004.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Bug ID: 68558
Summary: Fails to SLP loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 53947
Target Milestone: ---
void IMB_double_fast_x (int *destf, int *dest, int y, int *p1f)
{
int i;
for (i = y; i > 0; i--)
{
*dest++ = 0;
destf[0] = p1f[0];
destf[1] = p1f[1];
destf[2] = p1f[2];
destf[3] = p1f[3];
destf[4] = p1f[8];
destf[5] = p1f[9];
destf[6] = p1f[10];
destf[7] = p1f[11];
destf += 8;
p1f += 12;
}
}
fails to SLP because of
t.c:4:3: note: Detected interleaving store of size 8 starting with *destf_37 =
_13;
t.c:4:3: note: Detected interleaving load of size 12 starting with _13 =
*p1f_39;
t.c:4:3: note: Data access with gaps requires scalar epilogue loop
...
t.c:4:3: note: Build SLP failed: the number of interleaved loads is greater
than the SLP group size _13 = *p1f_39;
splitting the load group doesn't help because then we'll hit
t.c:4:3: note: Build SLP failed: differen interleaving chains in one node
splitting the store group to vector-size pieces would generally make sense
but may have interesting effects on SLP discovery like w/o also splitting
loads will hit the first issue above.
The best fix would be to lift the above restrictions and let permutation
support decide whether it can create the required loads or not.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
>From gcc-bugs-return-504079-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:50:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504079-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47635 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:50:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47198 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:50:34 -0000
From: "jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68551] GCC 5.2 build broken on arm/rasbian
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68551-4-3osNyb9PDE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03006.txt.bz2
Content-length: 944
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC| |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Either the log file on the pastebin has been changed since this bug was opened,
or this bug has nothing to do with GCC? At the time I closed this bug as
invalid the pastebin link said:
fatal: unable to access 'https://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git/': SSL
certificate problem: Invalid certificate chain
make[3]: ***
[/Volumes/OpenWrt/openwrt/dl/mtd-utils-1.5.1-92686f212c9a4e16891c6a3c57629cbf4f0f8360.tar.gz]
Error 128
>From gcc-bugs-return-504080-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:51:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504080-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50040 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:51:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50003 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 14:51:47 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68557] Missed x86 peephole optimization for multiplying by a bool
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68557-4-5jX3fYFvvo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03007.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1067
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Target| |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
it's larger though (so not -Os). If 'b' is already available as condition code
then a conditonal move from zero would also work.
So I wonder how to represent this on the GIMPLE level.
_2 = COND_EXPR <b_3 ? x_4 : 0>;
is a possibility and of course
_2 = COND_EXPR <b_3 ? -1 : 0>;
_5 = x_4 & _2;
or
_3 = (int) b_2;
_4 = -_3; // only if bool is unsigned
_5 = x_6 & _4;
the latter rely on the bool having only a the LSB set.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504081-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 14:57:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504081-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67195 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 14:57:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66812 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 14:56:58 -0000
From: "pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/53927] wrong value for DW_AT_static_link
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53927-4-cOxa9Ko5Sy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03008.txt.bz2
Content-length: 696
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #24 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:56:24 2015
New Revision: 230968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DWARF: fix loc. descr. generation for DW_AT_static_link
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/53927
* tree-nested.c (finalize_nesting_tree_1): Append a field to
hold the frame base address.
* dwarf2out.c (gen_subprogram_die): Generate for
DW_AT_static_link a location description that computes the value
of this field.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c
trunk/gcc/tree-nested.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504082-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:09:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504082-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94482 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:09:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94439 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:09:01 -0000
From: "chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68368] [6 regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68368-4-oBRyk9Xm3i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03009.txt.bz2
Content-length: 712
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed @r230871 with:
r230871 | jason | 2015-11-25 15:35:24 +0100 (Wed, 25 Nov 2015) | 6 lines
PR c++/68385
* tree.c (integer_zerop, integer_onep, integer_each_onep)
(integer_all_onesp, integer_minus_onep, integer_pow2p)
(integer_nonzerop, integer_truep, tree_log2, tree_floor_log2)
(real_zerop, real_onep, real_minus_onep): Remove STRIP_NOPS.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504083-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:10:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504083-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98272 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:10:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98189 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:10:52 -0000
From: "chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68368] [6 regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68368-4-5Lac8TLO4Q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03010.txt.bz2
Content-length: 393
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68385 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504084-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:10:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504084-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98443 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:10:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98230 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:10:53 -0000
From: "chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68385] [6 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68385-4-gpvJySlLFU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03011.txt.bz2
Content-length: 165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385
--- Comment #5 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 68368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504085-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:24:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504085-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1160 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:24:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1101 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:24:37 -0000
From: "linux at carewolf dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/51509] Inefficient neon intrinsic code sequence
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linux at carewolf dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-51509-4-2wvIpZPZ2E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51509-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03012.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
Allan Jensen <linux at carewolf dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #6 from Allan Jensen <linux at carewolf dot com> ---
I have run into a similar problem with vld3 and vst4.
uint8x16x3_t tmp = vld3q_u8(src);
vst4q_u8((uint8_t *)dst, {tmp.val[2], tmp.val[1], tmp.val[0], fullVector});
produces:
70: 4cdf4061 ld3 {v1.16b-v3.16b}, [x3], #48
74: 4e083c04 mov x4, v0.d[0]
78: 4e183c05 mov x5, v0.d[1]
7c: 6f000400 mvni v0.4s, #0x0
80: 4e083c4a mov x10, v2.d[0]
84: 4e183c4b mov x11, v2.d[1]
88: aa0403e2 mov x2, x4
8c: aa0503e1 mov x1, x5
90: 4e083c24 mov x4, v1.d[0]
94: 4e183c25 mov x5, v1.d[1]
98: a90007e2 stp x2, x1, [sp]
9c: 3d800fe0 str q0, [sp,#48]
a0: a9012fea stp x10, x11, [sp,#16]
a4: aa0403e6 mov x6, x4
a8: a90217e6 stp x6, x5, [sp,#32]
ac: 4c4023e0 ld1 {v0.16b-v3.16b}, [sp]
b0: 4c9f0000 st4 {v0.16b-v3.16b}, [x0], #64
But if I add -fno-split-wide-types it compiles to:
68: 4cdf4064 ld3 {v4.16b-v6.16b}, [x3], #48
6c: 4f000400 movi v0.4s, #0x0
70: 6f000403 mvni v3.4s, #0x0
74: 4ea51ca1 mov v1.16b, v5.16b
78: 4ea41c82 mov v2.16b, v4.16b
7c: 4c9f0000 st4 {v0.16b-v3.16b}, [x0], #64
This happens with both 4.9 and 5.1 that I have tried.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504087-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:34:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504087-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34270 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:34:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34211 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:34:29 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68559] Excessive peeling for gaps
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68559-4-PE92zQowBI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03014.txt.bz2
Content-length: 569
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504086-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:34:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504086-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33392 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:34:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33333 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:34:17 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68559] New: Excessive peeling for gaps
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter blocked target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03013.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2051
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Bug ID: 68559
Summary: Excessive peeling for gaps
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 53947
Target Milestone: ---
With N == 20 gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c only contains the peeling-for-gap copy
because of the following premature check which doesn't consider the
group being vectorized using SLP (or three-element interleaving).
SLP will never require gap peeling for exact_log2 (groupsize) == -1
and three-element interleaving neither.
The LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS analysis should be postponed (apart from
the single-element interleaving case).
static bool
vect_analyze_group_access_1 (struct data_reference *dr)
{
...
/* If there is a gap in the end of the group or the group size cannot
be made a multiple of the vector element count then we access excess
elements in the last iteration and thus need to peel that off. */
if (loop_vinfo
&& (groupsize - last_accessed_element > 0
|| exact_log2 (groupsize) == -1))
{
if (dump_enabled_p ())
dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
"Data access with gaps requires scalar "
"epilogue loop\n");
if (loop->inner)
{
if (dump_enabled_p ())
dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
"Peeling for outer loop is not supported\n");
return false;
}
LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo) = true;
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
>From gcc-bugs-return-504088-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:38:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504088-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41860 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:38:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41821 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:38:44 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68560] New: [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68560-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03015.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1197
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Bug ID: 68560
Summary: [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now
fails when compiled with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now (between r230703 and r230726) fails when
compiled with -flto
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90:10:0: warning: type of
'_gfortran_shape_4' does not match original declaration [-Wlto-type-mismatch]
if (any(shape(x) /= [ 2, 5 ])) call abort
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90:13:0: note: type mismatch
in parameter 3
if (any(shape(x,kind=4) /= [ 2, 5 ])) call abort
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90:13:0: note:
'_gfortran_shape_4' was previously declared here
i.e., the 'kind' argument is not understood as optional (it could be related to
pr46846).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504089-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:39:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504089-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44128 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:39:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44063 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:39:47 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68560] [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68560-4-GChnXQNEgX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68560-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68560-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03016.txt.bz2
Content-length: 409
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-504090-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:42:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504090-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53287 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:42:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53221 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:42:33 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68357] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/other/darwin-cfstring1.C -std=* (internal compiler error) on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|4)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68357-4-EAK9gNwH7O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68357-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68357-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03017.txt.bz2
Content-length: 522
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68357
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
It seems to have been fixed between revisions r230734 (FAIL) and r230777
(PASS), closing.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504091-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:58:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504091-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74438 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 15:58:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74113 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 15:58:27 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to target_milestone short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-cMT9SRxk2U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03018.txt.bz2
Content-length: 757
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|6.0 |5.3
Summary|[6 Regression]: ICE in in |[5/6 Regression]: ICE in in
|expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 |expand_expr_real_2 with -O2
|-ftree-vectorize |-ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ugh. Then it is 5/6 Regression though.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504092-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:02:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504092-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96501 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:02:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96444 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:02:26 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-z0iWnu9rnK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03019.txt.bz2
Content-length: 481
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36847
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36847&action=edit
gcc6-pr68552.patch
Untested fix. The issue was that the VEC_PERM expansion through vec_shr optab
was misplaced, thus it was done only when vec_perm*optab were non-zero for the
particular mode, and Alpha has no permutations, just the whole vector shifts.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504093-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:11:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504093-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127118 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:11:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126558 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:10:55 -0000
From: "EngyCZ at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug driver/68029] Strange behavior of -fdiagnostics-color option
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: driver
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: EngyCZ at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68029-4-JIxZUrVmux@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03020.txt.bz2
Content-length: 176
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #10 from Jiří Engelthaler <EngyCZ at gmail dot com> ---
Will this bug be resolved in 6.0 release?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504094-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:12:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504094-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1667 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:12:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129718 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:12:27 -0000
From: "ysrumyan at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ysrumyan at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68542-4-9Ho7uiTIHO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03021.txt.bz2
Content-length: 341
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan at gmail dot com> ---
I enhanced a patch for masked stores movement by guard on zero mask - move all
possible producers for stored value and performance degradation disappeared.
the patch will be re-designed and send for review next week.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504095-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:18:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504095-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13448 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:18:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13191 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:18:28 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68561] New: An improvement for VRP
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68561-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03022.txt.bz2
Content-length: 593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Bug ID: 68561
Summary: An improvement for VRP
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As mentioned here <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02758.html>,
it would be nice to implement get_integer_range () function that handles
symbolical ranges better.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504096-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:18:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504096-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14481 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:18:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14447 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:18:48 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68561] An improvement for VRP
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68561-4-Z6lVKtU0eF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68561-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68561-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03023.txt.bz2
Content-length: 495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-504097-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:31:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504097-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84233 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:31:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84199 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:31:12 -0000
From: "aurelien at aurel32 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aurelien at aurel32 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68302-4-olQnd2vVgo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68302-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03024.txt.bz2
Content-length: 456
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net> ---
The bisection shows that this commit has fixed the issue on trunk:
2015-07-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/66916
* match.pd: Guard widen and sign-change comparison simplification
with single_use.
That said, it just seems to be a side effect of this commit and not a fix for
the original issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504098-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:33:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504098-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89088 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:33:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88983 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:33:07 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68250-4-hlqHycFOav@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03025.txt.bz2
Content-length: 457
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
But this got fixed with r230795, so maybe yet another dup of the -free issue?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504099-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:35:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504099-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86238 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:35:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 70211 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:35:31 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/68562] New: config/i386/morestack.S misaligns stack on x86_64
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68562-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03026.txt.bz2
Content-length: 7733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562
Bug ID: 68562
Summary: config/i386/morestack.S misaligns stack on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
markus@x4 tmp % gdb --args /lib/ld-2.22.90.so =go
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-2.22.90.so...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /lib64/ld-2.22.90.so
/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/6.0.0/go
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
_dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6e28038 "__tls_get_addr",
undef_map=0x7ffff7ffa5d8, ref=ref@entry=0x7fffffffe310,
symbol_scope=0x7ffff7ffa930,
version=0x7ffff64c32d0, type_class=type_class@entry=1, flags=1,
skip_map=0x0) at dl-lookup.c:809
809 struct sym_val current_value = { NULL, NULL };
(gdb) bt
#0 _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6e28038 "__tls_get_addr",
undef_map=0x7ffff7ffa5d8, ref=ref@entry=0x7fffffffe310,
symbol_scope=0x7ffff7ffa930,
version=0x7ffff64c32d0, type_class=type_class@entry=1, flags=1,
skip_map=0x0) at dl-lookup.c:809
#1 0x0000555555564413 in _dl_fixup (l=<optimized out>, reloc_arg=<optimized
out>) at ../elf/dl-runtime.c:111
#2 0x000055555556ce1f in _dl_runtime_resolve_sse () at
../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-trampoline.h:112
#3 0x00007ffff79a35e7 in __generic_morestack_set_initial_sp
(sp=0x7fffffffe600, len=16000) at ../../../gcc/libgcc/generic-morestack.c:508
#4 0x00007ffff79a4d37 in __stack_split_initialize () at
../../../gcc/libgcc/config/i386/morestack.S:752
#5 0x0000555555565112 in call_init (l=<optimized out>, argc=argc@entry=1,
argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe510, env=env@entry=0x7fffffffe520) at dl-init.c:72
#6 0x0000555555565345 in call_init (env=0x7fffffffe520, argv=0x7fffffffe510,
argc=1, l=<optimized out>) at dl-init.c:30
#7 _dl_init (main_map=0x55555577c158, argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe510,
env=0x7fffffffe520) at dl-init.c:120
#8 0x0000555555554c7a in _dl_start_user () from /lib64/ld-2.22.90.so
#9 0x0000000000000002 in ?? ()
#10 0x0000000000000001 in ?? ()
#11 0x00007fffffffe86c in ?? ()
#12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) disass
Dump of assembler code for function _dl_lookup_symbol_x:
0x000055555555e8a0 <+0>: push %rbp
0x000055555555e8a1 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp
0x000055555555e8a4 <+4>: push %r15
0x000055555555e8a6 <+6>: push %r14
0x000055555555e8a8 <+8>: push %r13
0x000055555555e8aa <+10>: push %r12
0x000055555555e8ac <+12>: mov %rdx,%r15
0x000055555555e8af <+15>: push %rbx
0x000055555555e8b0 <+16>: mov %rsi,%r14
0x000055555555e8b3 <+19>: mov %r8,%r12
0x000055555555e8b6 <+22>: sub $0xc8,%rsp
0x000055555555e8bd <+29>: movzbl (%rdi),%edx
0x000055555555e8c0 <+32>: mov %rdi,-0xa8(%rbp)
0x000055555555e8c7 <+39>: mov %rcx,-0xd0(%rbp)
0x000055555555e8ce <+46>: mov %r9d,-0xbc(%rbp)
0x000055555555e8d5 <+53>: mov 0x18(%rbp),%r13
0x000055555555e8d9 <+57>: test %dl,%dl
0x000055555555e8db <+59>: je 0x55555555ec01 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+865>
0x000055555555e8e1 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rcx
0x000055555555e8e4 <+68>: mov $0x1505,%eax
0x000055555555e8e9 <+73>: nopl (%rax)
0x000055555555e8ec <+76>: nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0x000055555555e8f6 <+86>: nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0x000055555555e900 <+96>: mov %rax,%rsi
0x000055555555e903 <+99>: inc %rcx
0x000055555555e906 <+102>: shl $0x5,%rsi
0x000055555555e90a <+106>: add %rsi,%rax
0x000055555555e90d <+109>: add %rdx,%rax
0x000055555555e910 <+112>: movzbl (%rcx),%edx
0x000055555555e913 <+115>: test %dl,%dl
0x000055555555e915 <+117>: jne 0x55555555e900 <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+96>
0x000055555555e917 <+119>: mov %eax,%eax
0x000055555555e919 <+121>: mov %rax,-0xb0(%rbp)
0x000055555555e920 <+128>: pxor %xmm0,%xmm0
0x000055555555e924 <+132>: mov $0xffffffff,%eax
0x000055555555e929 <+137>: incq 0x21d048(%rip) # 0x55555577b978
<_rtld_local+2424>
0x000055555555e930 <+144>: test %r12,%r12
0x000055555555e933 <+147>: mov %rax,-0xa0(%rbp)
=> 0x000055555555e93a <+154>: movaps %xmm0,-0x90(%rbp)
...
(gdb) info registers
rax 0xffffffff 4294967295
rbx 0x7ffff7b78d58 140737349389656
rcx 0x7ffff6e28046 140737335427142
rdx 0x0 0
rsi 0x48fd0643617edba0 5259366826306886560
rdi 0x7ffff6e28038 140737335427128
rbp 0x7fffffffe2e8 0x7fffffffe2e8
rsp 0x7fffffffe1f8 0x7fffffffe1f8
r8 0x7ffff64c32d0 140737325576912
r9 0x1 1
r10 0x7ffff7ffa5d8 140737354114520
r11 0x7fffffffe41c 140737488348188
r12 0x7ffff64c32d0 140737325576912
r13 0x0 0
r14 0x7ffff7ffa5d8 140737354114520
r15 0x7fffffffe310 140737488347920
rip 0x55555555e93a 0x55555555e93a <_dl_lookup_symbol_x+154>
eflags 0x10202 [ IF RF ]
cs 0x33 51
ss 0x2b 43
ds 0x0 0
es 0x0 0
fs 0x0 0
gs 0x0 0
(0x7fffffffe1f8 + 0xc8) % 16 == 0 (instead of correct 8)
From config/i386/morestack.S:
745 #else /* defined(__x86_64__) */
746
747 leaq -16000(%rsp),%rax # We should have at least 16K.
748 X86_64_SAVE_NEW_STACK_BOUNDARY (ax)
749 movq %rsp,%rdi
750 movq $16000,%rsi
751 #ifdef __PIC__
752 call __generic_morestack_set_initial_sp@PLT
753 #else
754 call __generic_morestack_set_initial_sp
755 #endif
>From gcc-bugs-return-504100-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:43:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504100-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95083 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:43:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95048 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:43:09 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-HzGJps6jhc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03027.txt.bz2
Content-length: 346
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 36847 [details]
> gcc6-pr68552.patch
I have started a bootstrap + regtest with the above patch on alpha-linux-gnu
native, please expect results in ~10 hours.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504101-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:49:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504101-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106762 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:49:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106721 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:49:15 -0000
From: "torvald at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libitm/66453] In a deadlock libitm allocates all available RAM until oom is called
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libitm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-66453-4-2DlLwHngKa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03028.txt.bz2
Content-length: 897
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66453
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36848&action=edit
test case of original bug report
I can't reproduce this with the attached test case with current trunl. The
only difference to your test case is that the non-synchronization while loop is
technically undefined behavior, and to try to prevent this, I added the hack
that prevents the loop from being optimized out. Please test again, and reopen
the bug if you still see the OOM situation, ideally with more data on your test
environment.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504102-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:50:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504102-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109366 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:50:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109339 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:50:22 -0000
From: "torvald at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libitm/66453] In a deadlock libitm allocates all available RAM until oom is called
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libitm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66453-4-Yg7N8CExqA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03029.txt.bz2
Content-length: 433
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66453
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can't reproduce, so close this for now.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504103-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:51:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504103-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123968 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:50:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123945 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:50:56 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68563] New: LTO bootstrap fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03030.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2889
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
Bug ID: 68563
Summary: LTO bootstrap fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
An aarch64-none-linux-gnu native LTO bootstrap fails for me.
configure line is --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto.
I'm seeing a number of -Werror=lto-type-mismatch failures in libdecnumber,
including:
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal32.c:53:0: error: type of ‘decDigitsFromDPD’ does
not match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
extern void decDigitsFromDPD(decNumber *, const uInt *, Int);
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal128.c:52:0: error: type of ‘decDigitsFromDPD’ does
not match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
extern void decDigitsFromDPD(decNumber *, const uInt *, Int);
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal64.c:741:0: note: ‘decDigitsFromDPD’ was
previously declared here
void decDigitsFromDPD(decNumber *dn, const uInt *sour, Int declets) {
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal64.c:741:0: note: code may be misoptimized unless
-fno-strict-aliasing is used
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal32.c:52:0: error: type of ‘decDigitsToDPD’ does
not match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
extern void decDigitsToDPD(const decNumber *, uInt *, Int);
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal128.c:53:0: error: type of ‘decDigitsToDPD’ does
not match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
extern void decDigitsToDPD(const decNumber *, uInt *, Int);
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal64.c:615:0: note: ‘decDigitsToDPD’ was previously
declared here
void decDigitsToDPD(const decNumber *dn, uInt *targ, Int shift) {
$SRC/libdecnumber/dpd/decimal64.c:615:0: note: code may be misoptimized unless
-fno-strict-aliasing is used
$SRC/libdecnumber/decNumber.h:150:0: error: type of ‘decNumberPlus’ does not
match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
decNumber * decNumberPlus(decNumber *, const decNumber *, decContext *);
$SRC/libdecnumber/decNumber.h:150:0: error: type of ‘decNumberPlus’ does not
match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
decNumber * decNumberPlus(decNumber *, const decNumber *, decContext *);
$SRC/libdecnumber/decNumber.h:150:0: error: type of ‘decNumberPlus’ does not
match original declaration [-Werror=lto-type-mismatch]
decNumber * decNumberPlus(decNumber *, const decNumber *, decContext *);
>From gcc-bugs-return-504104-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:58:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504104-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23796 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 16:58:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23742 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 16:58:22 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68290] g++.dg/concepts/auto1.C FAILs
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68290-4-YZfsToDwyl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68290-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68290-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03031.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2356
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> This issue is host-dependent, it doesn't reproduce with a cross to 64-bit
> SPARC.
>
> The problematic types are:
>
> (gdb) p debug_tree(t1)
> <template_type_parm fb4ccae0 auto type_0 type_6 VOID
> align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type fb4ccae0
> index 0 level 1 orig_level 1
> chain <type_decl fb4ccb40 auto>>
>
> (gdb) p debug_tree(t2)
> <template_type_parm fb4cd0e0 auto VOID
> align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type fb4cd0e0
> index 0 level 1 orig_level 1
> chain <type_decl fb4cd140 auto>>
>
> and they compare equal according to structural_comptypes but have distinct
> TYPE_CANONICAL (themselves actually).
IIUC that's the bug: being equivalent as per structural_comptypes, they really
should have the same TYPE_CANONICAL. The problem then comes from:
/* Make a "constrained auto" type-specifier. This is an
auto type with constraints that must be associated after
deduction. The constraint is formed from the given
CONC and its optional sequence of arguments, which are
non-null if written as partial-concept-id. */
tree
make_constrained_auto (tree con, tree args)
{
tree type = make_auto();
/* Build the constraint. */
tree tmpl = DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (con);
tree expr;
if (VAR_P (con))
expr = build_concept_check (tmpl, type, args);
else
expr = build_concept_check (build_overload (tmpl, NULL_TREE), type, args);
tree constr = make_predicate_constraint (expr);
PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS (type) = constr;
/* Attach the constraint to the type declaration. */
tree decl = TYPE_NAME (type);
return decl;
}
The call to make_auto (make_auto_1) creates them with their TYPE_CANONICAL set
by means of canonical_type_parameter. Now canonical_type_parameter calls
structural_comptypes, which calls equivalent_placeholder_constraints, which
looks at the PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS... which are not yet set above.
IOW, the first call to structural_comptypes on them returns false so the
TYPE_CANONICAL of the second one is not set to the first one, then the
PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS of the second one is set so the second call to
structural_comptypes on them returns true, leading to the checking failure.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504105-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 17:09:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504105-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59942 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 17:09:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59904 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 17:09:17 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug driver/68029] Strange behavior of -fdiagnostics-color option
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: driver
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68029-4-ZHwklK2Ij0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03032.txt.bz2
Content-length: 371
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #10)
> Will this bug be resolved in 6.0 release?
Could you submit your patch to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org? See
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/ for how people do it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504106-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 17:11:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504106-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63840 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 17:11:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63786 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 17:11:39 -0000
From: "spop at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68453] [6 Regression] graphite ICE: segfault
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68453-4-OFoQDRdp2Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03033.txt.bz2
Content-length: 431
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop <spop at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed in r230918
>From gcc-bugs-return-504107-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 17:15:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504107-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77162 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 17:15:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77103 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 17:15:31 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68453] [6 Regression] graphite ICE: segfault
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68453-4-xcSXYak4nI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68453-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03034.txt.bz2
Content-length: 478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #4)
> fixed in r230918
Thanks!
I think if you make the changelog part of the commit message (in particular the
line containing PR tree-optimization/68453) an entry should appear
automatically in bugzilla (or else I don't quite know why this doesn't happen
in your case, but normally it does).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504108-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 17:43:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504108-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8385 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 17:43:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8340 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 17:43:34 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/67289] ICE in ipa-devirt.c
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-67289-4-wy9CErK2pt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03035.txt.bz2
Content-length: 310
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36849&action=edit
testcase
Compile with
g++ -O2 -flto -g -fPIC -std=gnu++0x -march=bdver1c testcase.ii
>From gcc-bugs-return-504109-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 17:49:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504109-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14703 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 17:49:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14650 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 17:49:43 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-HKoO7h4t4I@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03036.txt.bz2
Content-length: 446
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
The nsdmi-union6.C test failed after some of my (local) changes to the C++
implementation of flexible array members and I was able to trigger the failure
with an unmodified GCC and the modified test case in the description. (I
wasn't actively looking for a way to break things.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504110-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:01:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504110-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31304 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:01:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30794 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 18:01:21 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67876] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67876-4-tLEvyxxX69@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03037.txt.bz2
Content-length: 315
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #8)
> FAIL: g++.dg/pr67876.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
I inadvertently patched in the same test twice. It should be fixed now with
r230980.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504111-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:14:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504111-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80461 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:14:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80420 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 18:14:45 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/68562] morestack misaligns stack on x86_64
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68562-4-mdm9Kh5z4E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68562-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68562-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03038.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2163
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68562
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|config/i386/morestack.S |morestack misaligns stack
|misaligns stack on x86_64 |on x86_64
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Actually I think the misalignment starts here:
libgcc/generic-morestack.c:
495 void
496 __generic_morestack_set_initial_sp (void *sp, size_t len)
497 {
498 /* The stack pointer most likely starts on a page boundary. Adjust
499 to the nearest 512 byte boundary. It's not essential that we be
500 precise here; getting it wrong will just leave some stack space
501 unused. */
502 #ifdef __LIBGCC_STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD__
503 sp = (void *) ((((__UINTPTR_TYPE__) sp + 511U) / 512U) * 512U);
504 #else
505 sp = (void *) ((((__UINTPTR_TYPE__) sp - 511U) / 512U) * 512U);
506 #endif
>From gcc-bugs-return-504112-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:36:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504112-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48374 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:36:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48311 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 18:36:13 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67238] [C++11][C++14]cc1plus crash for nested decltype expression in parameter pack in trailing return type when '-g' enabled
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67238-4-Kh0hXEFHhC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03039.txt.bz2
Content-length: 185
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Let's add the testcase and close the bug as fixed for 6.0.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504114-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:44:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504114-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80479 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:44:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80435 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 18:44:48 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67238] [C++11][C++14]cc1plus crash for nested decltype expression in parameter pack in trailing return type when '-g' enabled
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-67238-4-O6xCQWgy7k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03041.txt.bz2
Content-length: 489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Done.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504113-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:44:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504113-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79645 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:44:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79321 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 18:44:20 -0000
From: "paolo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67238] [C++11][C++14]cc1plus crash for nested decltype expression in parameter pack in trailing return type when '-g' enabled
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67238-4-67AotKgWJa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67238-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03040.txt.bz2
Content-length: 484
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67238
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org <paolo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 26 18:43:47 2015
New Revision: 230981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/67238
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr67238.C: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr67238.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504115-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:49:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504115-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84246 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:49:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 84202 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 18:49:25 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] New: ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03042.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1655
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Bug ID: 68564
Summary: ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
trying to cross-build sparc64-linux-gnu ada with the gcc-5-branch 20151125 on a
x86_64-linux-gnu host, I get a build error building gnatlib
/scratch/packages/cross/5/p/gcc-5-cross-ports-1/gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/scratch/packages/cross/5/p/gcc-5-cross-ports-1/gcc/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/sparc64-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/sparc64-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/sparc64-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/sparc64-linux-gnu/sys-include
-isystem /scratch/packages/cross/5/p/gcc-5-cross-ports-1/gcc/build/sys-include
-c -g -O2 -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc a-cfinve.adb -o a-cfinve.o
a-cfinve.ads:240:04: warning: in instantiation at a-coboho.adb:47
a-cfinve.ads:240:04: warning: types for unchecked conversion have different
sizes
../gcc-interface/Makefile:321: recipe for target 'a-cfinve.o' failed
make[8]: *** [a-cfinve.o] Error 1
make[8]: Leaving directory
'/scratch/packages/cross/5/p/gcc-5-cross-ports-1/gcc/build/gcc/ada/rts'
gcc-interface/Makefile:2667: recipe for target 'gnatlib' failed
make[7]: *** [gnatlib] Error 2
make[7]: Leaving directory
'/scratch/packages/cross/5/p/gcc-5-cross-ports-1/gcc/build/gcc/ada'
gcc-interface/Makefile:2744: recipe for target 'gnatlib-shared-dual' failed
make[6]: *** [gnatlib-shared-dual] Error 2
>From gcc-bugs-return-504116-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 18:50:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504116-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89932 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 18:50:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89892 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 18:50:54 -0000
From: "andreast at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libffi/65726] [5/6 Regression] libffi fails to build when not bootstrapping: configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libffi
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-65726-4-4gXVJbtD5t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65726-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65726-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03043.txt.bz2
Content-length: 512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
Andreas Tobler <andreast at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2015-04-09 00:00:00 |2015-11-26
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler <andreast at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here the proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03289.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-504117-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 19:41:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504117-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19378 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 19:41:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19324 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 19:41:27 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-fGI6AiGjti@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03044.txt.bz2
Content-length: 461
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The nsdmi-union6.C test failed after some of my (local) changes to the C++
> implementation of flexible array members and I was able to trigger the
> failure with an unmodified GCC and the modified test case in the
> description. (I wasn't actively looking for a way to break things.)
OK, but how come you used -fdump-ada-spec on it?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504118-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:05:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504118-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71506 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:05:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71462 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:05:09 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68565] New: [6 Regression] graphite : -O2 -floop-nest-optimize miscompile
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03045.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2365
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
Bug ID: 68565
Summary: [6 Regression] graphite : -O2 -floop-nest-optimize
miscompile
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
current trunk lead to wrong code for the following testcase if
-floop-nest-optimize is used:
> cat test.f90
MODULE test
IMPLICIT NONE
TYPE subset_type
INTEGER :: ncon_tot
REAL(KIND=8),DIMENSION(:,:),ALLOCATABLE :: coeff
END TYPE
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE foo(subset)
TYPE(subset_type) :: subset
INTEGER :: icon1
DO icon1=1,subset%ncon_tot
subset%coeff(:,icon1)=subset%coeff(:,icon1)/&
SQRT(DOT_PRODUCT(subset%coeff(:,icon1),subset%coeff(:,icon1)))
END DO
END SUBROUTINE
END MODULE
USE test
TYPE(subset_type) :: subset
INTEGER, VOLATILE :: n1=7,n2=4
ALLOCATE(subset%coeff(n1,n2))
CALL RANDOM_NUMBER(subset%coeff)
subset%coeff=subset%coeff-0.5
subset%ncon_tot=n2
CALL foo(subset)
WRITE(6,*) MAXVAL(subset%coeff)
END
> gfortran -g -O2 -floop-nest-optimize test.f90 && ./a.out
Program received signal SIGFPE: Floating-point exception - erroneous arithmetic
operation.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x302a43269f in ???
#1 0x40095a in __test_MOD_foo
at /data/vjoost/gnu/bugs/test.f90:13
#2 0x400bb8 in MAIN__
at /data/vjoost/gnu/bugs/test.f90:25
#3 0x4007dc in main
at /data/vjoost/gnu/bugs/test.f90:18
Floating point exception
> gfortran -g -O2 test.f90 && ./a.out
0.75457607554184802
> gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151126 (experimental) [trunk revision 230923] (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504119-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:06:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504119-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 122787 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:06:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118664 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:06:00 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68565] [6 Regression] graphite : -O2 -floop-nest-optimize miscompile
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68565-4-B0BJOLyehe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03046.txt.bz2
Content-length: 587
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz
| |.ch, spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Known to fail| |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504120-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:23:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504120-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45415 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:23:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45387 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:23:19 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68566] New: ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03047.txt.bz2
Content-length: 876
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Bug ID: 68566
Summary: ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or
corruption)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Using wrong defined array a :
$ cat z1.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 2
integer, parameter :: a(:) = 0
integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, 1+a], [n, n])
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z1.f90
*** Error in `/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/5/f951': double free or
corruption (fasttop): 0x00000000028e93f0 ***
...
f951: internal compiler error: Aborted
>From gcc-bugs-return-504121-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:24:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504121-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46613 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:24:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46579 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:24:30 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68566-4-nzdWLnty6j@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03048.txt.bz2
Content-length: 899
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz <gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de> ---
Same issue with variants ...
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 2
integer, parameter :: a(2.) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, -a], [n, n])
end
$ cat z3.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 2
integer, parameter :: a('2') = 1
integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, -a], [n, n])
end
$ cat z4.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 2
integer, parameter :: a(.true.) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, -a], [n, n])
end
$ cat z5.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 2
integer, parameter :: a((0.,1.)) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, -a], [n, n])
end
Same issue with other intrinsic types, and without parameter attribute for b.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504122-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:27:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504122-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49138 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:27:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49097 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:27:50 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68567] New: ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03049.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1199
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
Bug ID: 68567
Summary: ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different
cases/messages)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Different examples (incl. DATA) with different error messages,
but strong related to pr68566.
$ cat zz3.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: a(:) = [2, 1]
integer :: b
data b / a(a(1)) /
print *, b
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all zz3.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
---
$ cat zz1.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: a(:) = [2, 1]
integer, parameter :: b = a(a(1))
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all zz1.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
---
$ cat zz2.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: a(:) = [2, 1]
integer :: b = a(a(1))
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all zz2.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>From gcc-bugs-return-504123-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:28:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504123-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50622 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:28:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50602 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:28:29 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68567-4-3EY7QuBjvU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03050.txt.bz2
Content-length: 619
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz <gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de> ---
$ cat z1.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: a(2.,2) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(2) = a(1:2, 2)
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z1.f90
f951: internal compiler error: compare_bound_int(): Bad expression
---
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer :: i
integer, parameter :: a('',2) = 1
integer, parameter :: b(4) = [a(1:2, 2), a(1:2, 1)]
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z2.f90
f951: internal compiler error: compare_bound_int(): Bad expression
>From gcc-bugs-return-504124-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:31:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504124-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55967 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:31:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55540 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:31:13 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68566-4-FmmoDYR5kG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03051.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1041
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #0)
> Using wrong defined array a :
>
> $ cat z1.f90
> program p
> integer, parameter :: n = 2
> integer, parameter :: a(:) = 0
> integer, parameter :: b(n, n) = reshape([a, 1+a], [n, n])
> end
>
>
> $ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z1.f90
> *** Error in `/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/5/f951': double free or
> corruption (fasttop): 0x00000000028e93f0 ***
> ...
> f951: internal compiler error: Aborted
With trunk, I get
laptop-kargl:kargl[247] gfc -c c1.f90
c1.f90:3:29:
integer, parameter :: a(:) = 0
1
Error: Parameter array 'a' at (1) cannot be automatic or of deferred shape
>From gcc-bugs-return-504125-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:33:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504125-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58192 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:33:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58159 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:33:34 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68568] New: ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03052.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1045
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
Bug ID: 68568
Summary: ICE with automatic character object and save, in
combination with some options
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling with "-finit-character" gives an internal error here :
$ cat z1a.f90
subroutine s(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
character(n) :: x
save
x = 'a'
end
$ gfortran -finit-character=7 -c z1a.f90
z1a.f90:1:0:
subroutine s(n)
1
internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575
$ gfortran -Wall -finit-character=7 -c z1a.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
# effectivly:
$ gfortran -Wsurprising -finit-character=7 -c z1a.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>From gcc-bugs-return-504126-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:34:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504126-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59107 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:34:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59082 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:34:10 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68568] ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68568-4-Wt1ObREnVu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03053.txt.bz2
Content-length: 764
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz <gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de> ---
As already known, this works without an error :
(A SAVE statement without a saved entity list is treated as though
it contained the names of all allowed items in the same scoping unit.)
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all -c z1a.f90
And this is detected :
(The SAVE attribute shall not be specified for an automatic data object.)
$ cat z1b.f90
subroutine s(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
character(n), save :: x
x = 'a'
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all -c z1b.f90
z1b.f90:3:26:
character(n), save :: x
1
Error: Automatic object 'x' at (1) cannot have the SAVE attribute
>From gcc-bugs-return-504127-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:35:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504127-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60353 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:35:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60089 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:35:07 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68568] ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68568-4-t2VFY9MDe3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03054.txt.bz2
Content-length: 436
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz <gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de> ---
Personal usage of "-finit-character" :
ONLY for debugging/checking, NEVER for production builds.
Issue is related to pr59537, where :
array , dimension(n) , -finit-real
This pr68568 differs in :
scalar, character(n) , -finit-character
Maybe a possible improvement in the long run.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504128-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:39:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504128-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75562 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:39:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 75525 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:39:21 -0000
From: "gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68569] New: ICE with automatic character object and DATA
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03055.txt.bz2
Content-length: 966
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68569
Bug ID: 68569
Summary: ICE with automatic character object and DATA
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
This issue is strong related to pr68568, but differs :
- initialization with DATA
- no explicit SAVE
- it does NOT depend on "-finit-character" nor "-Wall" etc.
$ cat z2a.f90
subroutine s(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
character(n) :: x
data x /'a'/
end
$ gfortran -c z2a.f90
z2a.f90:4:12:
data x /'a'/
1
Warning: Initialization string at (1) was truncated to fit the variable (0/1)
z2a.f90:1:0:
subroutine s(n)
1
internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1575
>From gcc-bugs-return-504129-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 20:44:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504129-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79509 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 20:44:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79458 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 20:43:59 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61321-4-qiBJ2uFBon@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03056.txt.bz2
Content-length: 505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yet another example:
template <typename T> struct S {};
template <typename T> S<decltype(*(T*)0)> f() {}
int main() {f<int>();}
(with Ian's go demangler:)
markus@x4 tmp % c++filt_ _Z1fIiE1SIDTdecvPT_Li0EEEv
S<decltype (*((int*)(0)))> f<int>()
markus@x4 tmp % c++filt _Z1fIiE1SIDTdecvPT_Li0EEEv
[1] 7743 segmentation fault c++filt _Z1fIiE1SIDTdecvPT_Li0EEEv
>From gcc-bugs-return-504130-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 21:58:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504130-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62010 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 21:58:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61932 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 21:58:14 -0000
From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67753-4-gSkGjrTcnB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03057.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1168
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Nov 26 21:57:40 2015
New Revision: 230985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] adjust for padding when bypassing memory in assign_parm_setup_block
Storing a register in memory as a full word and then accessing the
same memory address under a smaller-than-word mode amounts to
right-shifting of the register word on big endian machines. So, if
BLOCK_REG_PADDING chooses upward padding for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN, and
we're copying from the entry_parm REG directly to a pseudo, bypassing
any stack slot, perform the shifting explicitly.
This fixes the miscompile of function_return_val_10 in
gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-4.c for target aarch64_be-elf
introduced in the first patch for 67753.
for gcc/ChangeLog
PR rtl-optimization/67753
PR rtl-optimization/64164
* function.c (assign_parm_setup_block): Right-shift
upward-padded big-endian args when bypassing the stack slot.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/function.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504131-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 21:58:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504131-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62836 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 21:58:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62512 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 21:58:27 -0000
From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64164-4-ws1S6yN3Yz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64164-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64164-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03058.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1169
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Nov 26 21:57:40 2015
New Revision: 230985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67753] adjust for padding when bypassing memory in assign_parm_setup_block
Storing a register in memory as a full word and then accessing the
same memory address under a smaller-than-word mode amounts to
right-shifting of the register word on big endian machines. So, if
BLOCK_REG_PADDING chooses upward padding for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN, and
we're copying from the entry_parm REG directly to a pseudo, bypassing
any stack slot, perform the shifting explicitly.
This fixes the miscompile of function_return_val_10 in
gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-4.c for target aarch64_be-elf
introduced in the first patch for 67753.
for gcc/ChangeLog
PR rtl-optimization/67753
PR rtl-optimization/64164
* function.c (assign_parm_setup_block): Right-shift
upward-padded big-endian args when bypassing the stack slot.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/function.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504132-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:10:45 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504132-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71500 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:10:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71448 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:10:41 -0000
From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67753-4-4TKfZmm62Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03059.txt.bz2
Content-length: 285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In case someone gets here digging for more information about the patch above
than what's in comments, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02018.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-504133-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:14:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504133-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76168 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:14:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76111 invoked by uid 55); 26 Nov 2015 22:14:08 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-ZHjzP0bIYd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03060.txt.bz2
Content-length: 593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Nov 26 22:13:36 2015
New Revision: 230986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-25 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/67954
* lra-constraints.c (curr_insn_transform): Add check on scratch
pseudo when change class to NO_REGS. Add an assert.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/lra-constraints.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504134-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:15:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504134-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77367 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:15:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77302 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:15:31 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 / 6 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67954-4-vIgSVrR2wS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03061.txt.bz2
Content-length: 356
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov from comment #9)
> This also needs to be applied to the 4.9 branch -- it also contains an
> offending commit.
Thanks for the remainder. I've just committed the patch into gcc-4.9 branch
too.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504136-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:18:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504136-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79763 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:18:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79637 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:18:33 -0000
From: "su at cs dot ucdavis.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68570] New: ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03063.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3209
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Bug ID: 68570
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
Target Milestone: ---
The following code causes an ICE when compiled with the current gcc trunk at
-O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
It is a regression from 5.2.x.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151125 (experimental) [trunk revision 230867] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c small.c
$ gcc-5.2 -O1 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
fn1 ()
^~~
0xaf378f crash_signal
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:334
0xe4db44 gimple_truth_valued_p(tree_node*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*))
/tmp/objdir/gcc/gimple-match.c:162
0xec0d99 gimple_simplify_NE_EXPR
/tmp/objdir/gcc/gimple-match.c:47863
0xe53881 gimple_simplify
/tmp/objdir/gcc/gimple-match.c:52160
0xe5610d gimple_resimplify2(gimple**, code_helper*, tree_node*, tree_node**,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node*))
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-match-head.c:159
0xebebf0 gimple_simplify(gimple*, code_helper*, tree_node**, gimple**,
tree_node* (*)(tree_node*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node*))
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/gimple-match-head.c:748
0xb3b20f cleanup_control_expr_graph
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c:101
0xb3b20f cleanup_control_flow_bb
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c:200
0xb3b20f cleanup_tree_cfg_bb
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c:617
0xb3b878 cleanup_tree_cfg_1
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c:670
0xb3b878 cleanup_tree_cfg_noloop
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c:720
0xb3b878 cleanup_tree_cfg()
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c:771
0xa27ce4 execute_function_todo
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/passes.c:1911
0xa2873b execute_todo
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/passes.c:2010
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$
----------------------------------
int a, d, e, f, h, i, k;
void
fn1 ()
{
char m;
for (;;)
{
for (;;)
{
e = f = 1;
if (i)
d = h = 0;
else
a = 0;
break;
}
k = 0;
if (f)
a = 3;
if (d)
f = 0;
if (a > (i < 1))
{
if (e)
break;
}
else
i = m;
k = i ? a : i;
}
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-504135-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:18:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504135-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78582 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:18:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78520 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:17:56 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68565] [6 Regression] graphite : -O2 -floop-nest-optimize miscompile
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68565-4-Jygu0WJRwB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03062.txt.bz2
Content-length: 460
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68565
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Confirmed at r230977, r230903 is OK.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504137-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:27:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504137-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89130 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:27:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89085 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:27:00 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68566-4-KnywH7ndFj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03064.txt.bz2
Content-length: 557
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
I get
pointer being freed was not allocated
from 4.8 up to trunk (6.0).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504138-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:33:37 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504138-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93703 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:33:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93661 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:33:32 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68567-4-mgvKqUaN4D@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03065.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3146
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Confirmed from 4.8 up to trunk (6.0).
Backtrace
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
gfc_reduce_init_expr (expr=0x0) at ../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:2676
2676 if (expr->expr_type == EXPR_ARRAY)
(gdb) bt
#0 gfc_reduce_init_expr (expr=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in
psymtab, but not in symtab.)
0x0) at ../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:2676
#1 0x0000000100036aa9 in simplify_const_ref (p=0x14221db60) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1206
#2 0x000000010003759f in gfc_simplify_expr (p=0x14221db60, type=0) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1922
#3 0x00000001000376ae in simplify_parameter_variable (p=0x14221d930, type=0)
at ../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1787
#4 0x0000000100037581 in gfc_simplify_expr (p=0x14221d930, type=0) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1894
#5 0x00000001000377b3 in simplify_ref_chain (ref=0x14221d490, type=0) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1746
#6 0x0000000100037069 in gfc_simplify_expr (p=0x14221d3d0, type=0) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1912
#7 0x00000001000376ae in simplify_parameter_variable (p=0x14221ceb0, type=0)
at ../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:1787
#8 0x0000000100036748 in gfc_reduce_init_expr (expr=0x14221ceb0) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:2670
#9 0x000000010003781a in gfc_match_init_expr (result=0x7fff5fbfed88) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/expr.c:2709
#10 0x000000010001f8b5 in match_data_constant (result=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/decl.c:408
#11 0x000000010001f9a5 in top_val_list (data=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/decl.c:446
#12 0x000000010001fbf9 in gfc_match_data () at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/decl.c:575
#13 0x000000010007fdaa in match_word_omp_simd (subr=<optimized out>,
old_locus=<optimized out>, simd_matched=<optimized out>, str=<optimized out>)
at ../../_clean/gcc/fortran/parse.c:93
#14 0x0000000100083b90 in decode_statement () at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/parse.c:461
#15 0x0000000100085125 in next_statement () at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/parse.c:1074
#16 0x000000010008691d in parse_spec (st=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/parse.c:3344
#17 0x000000010008a4f7 in parse_progunit (st=<optimized out>) at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5126
#18 0x000000010008bdd2 in gfc_parse_file () at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5635
#19 0x00000001000d2756 in gfc_be_parse_file () at
../../_clean/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:199
#20 0x000000010098f9ea in compile_file () at ../../_clean/gcc/toplev.c:464
#21 0x0000000100d8c9c3 in ?? ()
#22 0x0000000100d8e389 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff5fbff308) at
../../_clean/gcc/main.c:39
>From gcc-bugs-return-504139-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:38:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504139-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39157 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:38:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39063 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:38:50 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-2PjIKi2yQw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03066.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1337
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> I'm trying to add support in arm for the smmlar instruction from ARMv6.
> The pattern for it looks like this:
> (define_insn "*mulsidi3siaddsi_round_v6"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
> (plus:SI
> (match_operator:SI 3 "subreg_highpart_operator"
> [(plus:DI
> (mult:DI
> (sign_extend:DI
> (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "%r"))
> (sign_extend:DI
> (match_operand:SI 2 "s_register_operand" "r")))
> (const_int 2147483648))])
> (match_operand:SI 4 "s_register_operand" "r")))]
> "TARGET_32BIT && arm_arch6"
> "smmlar%?\\t%0, %1, %2, %4"
> [(set_attr "type" "smmla")
> (set_attr "predicable" "yes")
> (set_attr "predicable_short_it" "no")]
> )
>
When I try to build GCC with this pattern, I have
‘subreg_highpart_operator’ was not declared in this scope
Could you provide the predicate definition.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504140-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 22:47:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504140-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43790 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 22:47:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 43755 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 22:47:48 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68569] ICE with automatic character object and DATA
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68569-4-RlCyGojp0Y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03067.txt.bz2
Content-length: 554
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68569
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-26
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
I don't get the warning, but I get the ICE from 4.8 up to trunk (5.0).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504141-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 23:06:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504141-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125970 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 23:06:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125940 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 23:06:15 -0000
From: "luser.droog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68454] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luser.droog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68454-4-PTPzmm9hRq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03068.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #14 from M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 36850
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36850&action=edit
gmp component triggering the same error
I've been able to modify some of the gmp sources to avoid this bug, by changing
fp constants to integer. But this one won't work since 1e37 is way outside
`int` range.
josh@LAPTOP-ILO10OOF /tmp/gmp-4.3.2
$ make CFLAGS=-save-temps
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2'
Making all in tests
make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests'
Making all in .
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests'
Making all in devel
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/devel'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/devel'
Making all in mpn
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpn'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpn'
Making all in mpz
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpz'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpz'
Making all in mpq
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpq'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpq'
Making all in mpf
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpf'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpf'
Making all in rand
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/rand'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/rand'
Making all in misc
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/misc'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/misc'
Making all in cxx
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/cxx'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/cxx'
Making all in mpbsd
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpbsd'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests/mpbsd'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/tests'
Making all in mpn
make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/mpn'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
-D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo mp_bases | sed 's/_$//'`
-save-temps -c -o mp_bases.lo mp_bases.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_mp_bases
-save-temps -c mp_bases.c -o mp_bases.o
mp_bases.c:13:13: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
/* 1 */ { 0, 1e37, 0 },
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Makefile:385: recipe for target 'mp_bases.lo' failed
make[2]: *** [mp_bases.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2/mpn'
Makefile:925: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/gmp-4.3.2'
Makefile:666: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
>From gcc-bugs-return-504142-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 23:08:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504142-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130662 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 23:08:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130610 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 23:08:30 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-82YX6Yljnb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03069.txt.bz2
Content-length: 485
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The dump-ada-spec-2.C had failed with my local change (C++ flexible arrays
change from 'array(0 .. -1)' to 'array(size_t)'; I expect the latter is more
correct). While reproducing the failure, I used the option on the command
line. Then, while reproducing another failure in nsdmi-union6.C, I
accidentally used the same option again and stumbled into the failure.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504143-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 23:32:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504143-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69891 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 23:32:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69837 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 23:32:23 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68527] ICE with -fdump-ada-spec on invalid C++ 11 code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68527-4-c7O0UfpK2B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68527-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03070.txt.bz2
Content-length: 652
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The dump-ada-spec-2.C had failed with my local change (C++ flexible arrays
> change from 'array(0 .. -1)' to 'array(size_t)'; I expect the latter is more
> correct). While reproducing the failure, I used the option on the command
> line. Then, while reproducing another failure in nsdmi-union6.C, I
> accidentally used the same option again and stumbled into the failure.
I see, thanks. We tried very hard to come up with a name that couldn't be
typed inadvertently but we are obviously outsmarted by a simple shell. ;-)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504144-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 23:35:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504144-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71943 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 23:35:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71877 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 23:35:07 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-quDpOrjq7n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03071.txt.bz2
Content-length: 638
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, I was doing this on top of the patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00686.html
The subreg_highpart_operator predicate is defined as:
(define_special_predicate "subreg_highpart_operator"
(and (match_code "subreg")
(match_test "GET_MODE_SIZE (mode)
< GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (op)))
&& SUBREG_BYTE (op)
== subreg_highpart_offset (mode,
GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (op)))")))
>From gcc-bugs-return-504145-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 23:47:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504145-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80984 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 23:47:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 80905 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 23:46:59 -0000
From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/67355] [5 Regression] ICE compiling LTP testcase, endless cselib recursion from var-tracking
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-67355-4-Dy0GpCI8tp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67355-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67355-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03072.txt.bz2
Content-length: 533
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine. Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03302.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-504146-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 23:57:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504146-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118360 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 23:57:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 118239 invoked by uid 48); 26 Nov 2015 23:57:11 -0000
From: "anthony.brandon at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.4.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, easyhack
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: anthony.brandon at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-19808-4-eFhO28ywfT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-19808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-19808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03073.txt.bz2
Content-length: 867
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Anthony Brandon <anthony.brandon at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #36706|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #29 from Anthony Brandon <anthony.brandon at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 36851
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36851&action=edit
Updated patch for PR19808.
I updated my patch to include a testcase, and I also fixed the case for
anonymous unions.
Things not working right (as far as i know) in this patch yet are:
* references
* pointers
* multiple uninitialized values being used to initialize a single field. (I'm
also not sure how to test for this in the testsuite)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504147-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 00:31:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504147-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32558 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 00:31:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32519 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 00:31:36 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68571] New: provide __builtin_cookie_size
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68571-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03074.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2958
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68571
Bug ID: 68571
Summary: provide __builtin_cookie_size
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The array forms of the C++ new expression are specified to invoke the
corresponding operator new with a size_t argument set to the product of the
number elements, nelems, and the size of the type, sizeof(T), plus some
(possibly zero) overhead, X. The C++ standard doesn't specify the amount of
overhead that is added, except that it may be different from one invocation of
the new expression to another. This makes it difficult to write portable
programs that use the array placement new expression to construct an array of
objects into a fixed size buffer: how much bigger than nelems * sizeof(T)
should the buffer be?
On all targets but one, GCC uses the greater of sizeof(size_t) and alignof(T)
as the amount of overhead. On ARM, however, the EABI specifies the minimum
overhead to be 8 bytes, regardless of the data model (i.e., ILP32 or LP64).
See Section 3.2.2 of the ARM EABI:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0041d/IHI0041D_cppabi.pdf.
To make it less error-prone to write programs that are portable to all targets
supported by GCC, the compiler should provide an API to query the size of the
cookie for a given new expression. The API should take as operands the type of
the new expression (in a form such as a pointer to the type), and the number of
elements to be allocated.
Below is a proposed outline of the the API in a style suitable for the GCC
manual:
-- Built-in Function: size_t __builtin_cookie_size (type *ptr, size_t nelems)
Returns the amount of overhead, in bytes, that an array form of a new
expression adds to the number of bytes it requests the corresponding operator
new to allocate for an array of nelems elements of the specified type. The
pointer ptr is not evaluated. The result is a constant expression when nelems
is a constant expression. The overhead should be queried when determining the
amount of storage to allocate before invoking the array form of a placement new
expression to construct an array of objects in place. For example:
const size_t Overhead = __builtin_cookie_size((T*)0, NELEMS);
unsigned char buf [NELEMS * sizeof(MyType) + Overhead];
new (buf) MyType [NELEMS]
For additional background on some of the problems that providing such an API
can prevent, see the Noncompliant Code Example (Failure to Account For Array
Overhead) in the CERT C++ Secure Coding Standard rule MEM54-CPP. Provide
placement new with properly aligned pointers to sufficient storage capacity:
https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/x/KQBEAw
>From gcc-bugs-return-504148-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 01:35:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504148-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47830 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 01:35:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47716 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 01:35:19 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68572] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03075.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Bug ID: 68572
Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36852
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36852&action=edit
test case
seen with 4.9 branch, 5 branch and trunk on x86_64-linux-gnu, building with -O1
works around it.
$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -std=gnu++11 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -c
16_min.hM.min.ii
16_min.hM.min.ii: In member function 'virtual void J::PopClip()':
16_min.hM.min.ii:77:1: error: statement uses released SSA name:
}
^
# .MEM_31 = VDEF <.MEM>
MEM[(struct &)_19] ={v} {CLOBBER};
The use of _19 should have been replaced
16_min.hM.min.ii:77:1: internal compiler error: cannot update SSA form
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
I don't get a sensible backtrace from gdb.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504149-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 02:01:33 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504149-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73946 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 02:01:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73788 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 02:01:27 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68573] New: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=<n> discarded without notice
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 02:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03076.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1125
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68573
Bug ID: 68573
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=<n>
discarded without notice
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
[forwarded from https://bugs.debian.org/PR805044]
In 4.7, -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=<n> had some output, however in newer
versions this option is just discarded without giving any output.
Test case from PR50680.
$ gcc-4.7 -Ofast -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1 --std=c99 -msse -c vectorizeme.c
|tail
Analyzing loop at vectorizeme.c:54
Analyzing loop at vectorizeme.c:58
Vectorizing loop at vectorizeme.c:58
58: LOOP VECTORIZED.
vectorizeme.c:57: note: vectorized 1 loops in function.
Analyzing loop at vectorizeme.c:62
Vectorizing loop at vectorizeme.c:62
62: LOOP VECTORIZED.
vectorizeme.c:61: note: vectorized 1 loops in function.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504150-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 04:46:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504150-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45289 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 04:46:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45271 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 04:46:04 -0000
From: "programmerjake at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68574] New: add -W#pragma-messages equivalent
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: programmerjake at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03077.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4276
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68574
Bug ID: 68574
Summary: add -W#pragma-messages equivalent
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: programmerjake at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
There is no -Wno-error=... option to prevent conversion of warnings from
#pragma GCC warning "..."
to error messages when using -Werror
Test Case:
Source:
#pragma GCC warning "my warning"
Command Line:
g++ -v -fdiagnostics-show-option -Werror test.cpp
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-5.2.0/configure --prefix
/data/teamcity/work/sud-chibld05-002-RHEL6/cd26a0c570c605bd/scratch/gcc/5.2.0/staging
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-multilibs --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-ld=yes --enable-gold=yes
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-linker-build-id
--enable-lto --enable-plugins --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-pkgversion=GCC-explorer-build
--with-system-zlib --disable-werror
--with-libelf=/data/teamcity/work/sud-chibld05-002-RHEL6/cd26a0c570c605bd/scratch/gcc/5.2.0/build/libelf-0.8.13
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC-explorer-build)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-fdiagnostics-show-option' '-Werror' '-masm=intel'
'-g' '-o' '/tmp/gcc-explorer-compiler1151027-68-1cy2m3d/output.S' '-S'
'-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/cc1plus -quiet -v
-iprefix /opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/ -D_GNU_SOURCE
/tmp/gcc-explorer-compiler1151027-68-1cy2m3d/example.cpp -quiet -dumpbase
example.cpp -masm=intel -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip
/tmp/gcc-explorer-compiler1151027-68-1cy2m3d/output.S -g -Werror -version
-fdiagnostics-show-option -o
/tmp/gcc-explorer-compiler1151027-68-1cy2m3d/output.S
GNU C++ (GCC-explorer-build) version 5.2.0 (x86_64-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 5.2.0, GMP version 4.3.2, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC
version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=63 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../include/c++/5.2.0"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../include/c++/5.2.0/x86_64-linux-gnu"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../include/c++/5.2.0/backward"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include-fixed"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../include/c++/5.2.0
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../include/c++/5.2.0/x86_64-linux-gnu
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/../../../../include/c++/5.2.0/backward
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include-fixed
/usr/local/include
/opt/gcc-5.2.0/bin/../lib/gcc/../../include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C++ (GCC-explorer-build) version 5.2.0 (x86_64-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 5.2.0, GMP version 4.3.2, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC
version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=63 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: 1179f1e221bf82c10f9efb16cae24728
1 : error: my warning [-Werror]
#pragma GCC warning "my warning"
^
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
Compilation failed
>From gcc-bugs-return-504151-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 04:48:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504151-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47465 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 04:48:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47443 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 04:48:42 -0000
From: "programmerjake at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68574] add -W#pragma-messages equivalent
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: programmerjake at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68574-4-sWTNvKCMRX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03078.txt.bz2
Content-length: 455
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68574
programmerjake at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |programmerjake at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from programmerjake at gmail dot com ---
I suggest either adding clang's option -W#pragma-messages or adding
-Wpragma-messages.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504152-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:21:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504152-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54877 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:21:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54793 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:21:34 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68572] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68572-4-Cu2o4DSmuU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03079.txt.bz2
Content-length: 581
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
dup
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68470 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504153-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:21:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504153-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54891 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:21:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 54831 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:21:35 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/68470] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal Compiler Error observed by g++-4.9.2 and a few other versions (reported to Debian)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68470-4-FEMenxxJZU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03080.txt.bz2
Content-length: 456
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68572 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504154-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:32:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504154-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60392 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:32:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60355 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:32:02 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68568] ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68568-4-BxaDjbgDDg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03081.txt.bz2
Content-length: 521
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Confirmed from 4.8 up to trunk (6.0).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504155-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:45:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504155-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92898 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:45:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92800 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:44:58 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68575] New: [6 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed, definition in block 2 follows the use
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03082.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2529
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68575
Bug ID: 68575
Summary: [6 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed, definition in
block 2 follows the use
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
overnight regression with current trunk:
> cat bug.f90
MODULE qs_efield_berry
TYPE cp_error_type
END TYPE
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
TYPE qs_energy_type
REAL(KIND=dp), POINTER :: efield
END TYPE
TYPE qs_environment_type
END TYPE
INTERFACE
SUBROUTINE foo(qs_env,energy,error)
IMPORT
TYPE(qs_environment_type), POINTER :: qs_env
TYPE(cp_error_type) :: error
TYPE(qs_energy_type), POINTER :: energy
END SUBROUTINE
END INTERFACE
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE qs_efield_mo_derivatives()
TYPE(qs_environment_type), POINTER :: qs_env
TYPE(cp_error_type) :: error
COMPLEX(dp) :: zi(3), zphase(3)
REAL(dp) :: ci(3)
TYPE(qs_energy_type), POINTER :: energy
CALL foo(qs_env, energy, error)
zi = zi * zphase
ci = AIMAG(LOG(zi))
DO idir=1,3
ener_field=ener_field+ci(idir)*fieldfac(idir)
END DO
energy%efield=ener_field
END SUBROUTINE qs_efield_mo_derivatives
END MODULE qs_efield_berry
> gfortran -c -O3 bug.f90
bug.f90:19:0:
SUBROUTINE qs_efield_mo_derivatives()
Error: definition in block 2 follows the use
for SSA_NAME: _65 in statement:
vectp.27_93 = &REALPART_EXPR <zi[_65]>;
bug.f90:19:0: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
0xd78664 verify_ssa(bool, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa.c:1039
0xa9346d execute_function_todo
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1965
0xa93e0b execute_todo
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:2010
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151127 (experimental) [trunk revision 230990] (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504157-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:57:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504157-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111828 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:57:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111699 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:57:46 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68379] [6 Regression] BB vectorization: definition in block 13 follows the use for SSA_NAME
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68379-4-Qn3Dxqagau@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03084.txt.bz2
Content-length: 522
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68379
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz
| |.ch
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504156-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:57:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504156-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111794 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:57:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 111686 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:57:46 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68575] [6 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed, definition in block 2 follows the use
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68575-4-Rdp2EHtN5t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03083.txt.bz2
Content-length: 581
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68575
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
dup
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68379 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504158-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 06:59:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504158-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19338 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 06:59:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12814 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 06:59:53 -0000
From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-LTkMjEU6ay@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03085.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1661
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #1)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > I'm trying to add support in arm for the smmlar instruction from ARMv6.
> > The pattern for it looks like this:
> > (define_insn "*mulsidi3siaddsi_round_v6"
> > [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
> > (plus:SI
> > (match_operator:SI 3 "subreg_highpart_operator"
> > [(plus:DI
> > (mult:DI
> > (sign_extend:DI
> > (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "%r"))
> > (sign_extend:DI
> > (match_operand:SI 2 "s_register_operand" "r")))
> > (const_int 2147483648))])
> > (match_operand:SI 4 "s_register_operand" "r")))]
> > "TARGET_32BIT && arm_arch6"
> > "smmlar%?\\t%0, %1, %2, %4"
> > [(set_attr "type" "smmla")
> > (set_attr "predicable" "yes")
> > (set_attr "predicable_short_it" "no")]
> > )
> >
>
> When I try to build GCC with this pattern, I have
>
> ‘subreg_highpart_operator’ was not declared in this scope
>
> Could you provide the predicate definition.
Hi Vlad,
I also ran into ICE with lra_emit_add, though it might be another issue. I
have done preliminary investigation, so could you please give some suggestions?
The thread is at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02446.html
Thanks very much.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504159-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 07:44:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504159-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99939 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 07:44:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99879 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 07:44:35 -0000
From: "majun4950646 at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68576] New: scev failed for loop auto parallelize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03086.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3039
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
Bug ID: 68576
Summary: scev failed for loop auto parallelize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
Target Milestone: ---
scev failed to analyze the 1st and 2nd loop in the following example (come from
testsuit interchange-2.f,which is the kernel extracted from bwaves)
---
subroutine foo(f1,f2,f3,f4,f5,f6,f7,f8,f9,f0,g1,g2,g3)
implicit none
integer f4,f3,f2,f1
integer g4,g5,g6,g7,g8,g9
integer i1,i2,i3,i4,i5
real*8 g1(f4,f3,f2,f1),g2(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1),g3(f4,f3,f2,f1)
real*8 f0(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1),f9(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1),f8(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1)
real*8 f7(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1),f6(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1),f5(f4,f4,f3,f2,f1)
do i3=1,f1
g8=mod(i3+f1-2,f1)+1
g9=mod(i3,f1)+1
do i4=1,f2
g6=mod(i4+f2-2,f2)+1
g7=mod(i4,f2)+1
do i5=1,f3
g4=mod(i5+f3-2,f3)+1
g5=mod(i5,f3)+1
do i1=1,f4
g3(i1,i5,i4,i3)=0.0d0
do i2=1,f4
g3(i1,i5,i4,i3)=g3(i1,i5,i4,i3)+
1 g2(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,i4,i3)+
2 f0(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,g5,i4,i3)+
3 f9(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,g7,i3)+
4 f8(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,i4,g9)+
5 f7(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,g4,i4,i3)+
6 f6(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,g6,i3)+
7 f5(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,i4,g8)
enddo
enddo
enddo
enddo
enddo
return
end
---
scev analysis for the first loop cause some data ref's access function is
scev_not_known,
dump info like this:
---
Creating dr for *g3_77(D)[_76]
base_address: g3_77(D)
offset from base address: (ssizetype) ((sizetype) (_370 + _372) * 8)
constant offset from base address: 8
step: 8
aligned to: 8
base_object: *g3_77(D)
Access function 0: scev_not_known;
Creating dr for *g2_90(D)[_89]
base_address: g2_90(D)
offset from base address: (ssizetype) ((sizetype) (((_378 + _379) +
stride.88_19) + (integer(kind=8)) i1_1) * 8)
constant offset from base address: 0
step: (ssizetype) ((sizetype) stride.88_19 * 8)
aligned to: 8
base_object: *g2_90(D)
Access function 0: scev_not_known;
---
this will cause data dep check failed because of access function not affine or
constant,and cause this loop cannot be paralleled.
the 2nd loop is the same with the 1st loop, it can only be paralleled on the
3rd loop,which this can parallel on the 1st loop apparently.
so,it looks like scev issue?
---
Thanks
Jun
>From gcc-bugs-return-504160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 07:48:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103915 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 07:48:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103864 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 07:48:24 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68379] [6 Regression] BB vectorization: definition in block 13 follows the use for SSA_NAME
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68379-4-ZAEG2bhjOq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03087.txt.bz2
Content-length: 337
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68379
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> *** Bug 68575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The testcase in PR68575 doesn't require avx, so might be useful for the
testsuite.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504162-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 07:50:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504162-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105725 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 07:50:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105434 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 07:50:24 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68379] [6 Regression] BB vectorization: definition in block 13 follows the use for SSA_NAME
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68379-4-DAq4XHQTxS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68379-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03089.txt.bz2
Content-length: 680
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68379
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|aarch64 |aarch64,
| |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
additionally, the target is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>From gcc-bugs-return-504161-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 07:50:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504161-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105186 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 07:50:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105137 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 07:50:17 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68434] [concepts] ICE: same canonical type node for different types
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68434-4-Nd2KcvIrLu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03088.txt.bz2
Content-length: 7133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I hit the issue today when compiling the cmcstl2 lib.
It might even be caused by Jason's patch:
markus@x4 test % cat meta.ii
namespace std {
typedef int size_t;
template <typename _Tp, _Tp __v> struct A {
static constexpr _Tp value = __v;
typedef _Tp value_type;
};
typedef A<bool, true> true_type;
template <bool, typename, typename> struct conditional;
struct B : true_type {};
template <typename> struct is_integral : B {};
template <typename, typename> struct is_same : true_type {};
template <typename _Iftrue, typename _Iffalse>
struct conditional<false, _Iftrue, _Iffalse> {
typedef _Iffalse type;
};
}
template <typename...> struct list;
template <template <typename...> class> struct quote;
namespace detail {
template <typename> bool _is_list;
template <typename Ts> constexpr bool _is_list<list<Ts>> = true;
}
template <typename T, typename U> concept bool Same = std::is_same<T,
U>::value;
template <typename T> concept bool Trait = requires { typename T; };
template <typename T> concept bool AliasClass = requires {
typename quote<T::template apply>;
};
template <typename T> concept bool List = detail::_is_list<T>;
template <typename T>
concept bool Integral = requires{{T()}->Same<typename T::value_type>};
template <typename> struct id;
template <AliasClass...> struct compose;
template <Trait T> using _t = typename T::type;
template <class T> constexpr typename T::value_type _v = T::value;
template <long N> using size_t = std::A<long, N>;
template <bool B> using bool_ = std::A<bool, B>;
template <AliasClass Fn, typename... Args>
using apply = typename Fn::template apply<Args...>;
namespace detail {
template <template <typename...> class C, typename... Ts> struct defer_ {
using type = C<Ts...>;
};
}
template <template <typename...> class C, typename... Ts>
struct defer : detail::defer_<C, Ts...> {};
template <AliasClass Fn0> struct compose<Fn0> {
template <typename... Ts> using apply = apply<Fn0, Ts...>;
};
template <AliasClass Fn0, AliasClass... Fns> struct compose<Fn0, Fns...> {
template <typename... Ts>
using apply = apply<Fn0, apply<compose<Fns...>, Ts...>>;
};
template <template <typename...> class C> struct quote {
template <typename... Ts> using apply = _t<defer<C, Ts...>>;
};
namespace detail {
template <typename...> struct _if_;
template <Integral If, typename Then, typename Else>
struct _if_<If, Then, Else> : std::conditional<_v<If>, Then, Else> {};
}
template <typename... Args> using if_ = _t<detail::_if_<Args...>>;
template <bool B> using not_c = bool_<!B>;
template <Integral B> using not_ = not_c<_v<B>>;
template <typename... Ts> struct list {
static constexpr std::size_t size() { return sizeof...(Ts); }
};
template <List L> using size = size_t<L::size()>;
template <List L> using empty = bool_<0 == _v<size<L>>>;
namespace detail {
template <typename, typename> struct find_if_ { using type = list<>; };
template <typename Head, typename... L, typename Fn>
struct find_if_<list<Head, L...>, Fn>
: if_<apply<Fn, Head>, id<list<>>, find_if_<int, Fn>> {};
}
template <List L, AliasClass Fn> using find_if = _t<detail::find_if_<L, Fn>>;
template <AliasClass Fn> using not_fn = compose<quote<not_>, Fn>;
template <List L, AliasClass Fn> using all_of = empty<find_if<L, not_fn<Fn>>>;
static_assert(all_of<list<long>, quote<std::is_integral>>::value);
markus@x4 test % g++ -std=c++1z -c meta.ii
meta.ii: In substitution of ‘template<class T> requires predicate( Trait<T>)
using _t = typename T::type [with T = detail::_if_<std::A<bool, false>,
id<list<> >, detail::find_if_<int, compose<quote< requires predicate(
Integral<B>) not_>, quote<std::is_integral> > > >]’:
meta.ii:61:66: required by substitution of ‘template<class ... Args> using
if_ = _t<detail::_if_<Args ...> > [with Args = {apply<compose<quote< requires
predicate( Integral<B>) not_>, quote<std::is_integral> >, long int>, id<list<>
>, detail::find_if_<int, compose<quote< requires predicate( Integral<B>) not_>,
quote<std::is_integral> > >}]’
meta.ii:72:8: required from ‘struct detail::find_if_<list<long int>,
compose<quote< requires predicate( Integral<B>) not_>, quote<std::is_integral>
> >’
meta.ii:77:78: required by substitution of ‘template<class L, class Fn>
requires predicate( List<L>) and predicate(AliasClass<Fn>) using all_of =
empty<typename detail::find_if_<L, compose<quote< requires predicate(
Integral<B>) not_>, Fn> >::type> [with L = list<long int>; Fn =
quote<std::is_integral>]’
meta.ii:78:56: required from here
meta.ii:33:47: internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different
types Same<typename B::value_type> and Same<std::A<bool, false>::value_type>
template <Trait T> using _t = typename T::type;
^
0x72fab4 comptypes(tree_node*, tree_node*, int)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c:1435
0x6265af template_args_equal
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:7851
0x626d92 comp_template_args_with_info
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:7898
0x634da4 comp_template_args(tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:7916
0x634da4 spec_hasher::equal(spec_entry*, spec_entry*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:1642
0x68818f hash_table<spec_hasher, xcallocator>::find_with_hash(spec_entry*
const&, unsigned int)
../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:788
0x6627dd lookup_template_class_1
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:8297
0x6627dd lookup_template_class(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*,
int, int)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:8611
0x666c18 tsubst_aggr_type
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:11280
0x64f132 tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:12743
0x6495ca tsubst_qualified_id
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:13573
0x64ae7b tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:16028
0x640773 tsubst_expr(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:15620
0x81deef lift_variable_initializer
../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:403
0x81d6a0 normalize_predicate_constraint
../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:882
0x81d6a0 normalize_constraint
../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:921
0x81db6a evaluate_constraints(tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:2085
0x81dbd4 constraints_satisfied_p(tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:2169
0x63da0a do_auto_deduction(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, int,
auto_deduction_context)
../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:23765
0x81c525 satisfy_argument_deduction_constraint
../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:1903
>From gcc-bugs-return-504163-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 07:52:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504163-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106976 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 07:52:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106950 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 07:52:02 -0000
From: "majun4950646 at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68576] scev failed for loop auto parallelize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68576-4-jrvevSQ1CB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03090.txt.bz2
Content-length: 290
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
--- Comment #1 from majun <majun4950646 at 163 dot com> ---
Sorry forget the command.
The example is compiled with
gcc -S -msse4.2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 -fdump-tree-parloops-details -O3
interchange-2.f -o interchange-2.s
>From gcc-bugs-return-504164-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:17:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504164-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12479 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:17:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12422 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:17:39 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68577] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in expand_direct_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:2171
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-68577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03091.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68577
Bug ID: 68577
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in expand_direct_optab_fn, at
internal-fn.c:2171
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
trippels@gcc2-power8 posix % cat sched_cpucount.i
int a, b;
void __sched_cpucount() {
while (b) {
long l = b++;
a += __builtin_popcountl(l);
}
}
trippels@gcc2-power8 posix % gcc -c -O3 sched_cpucount.i
sched_cpucount.i: In function ‘__sched_cpucount’:
sched_cpucount.i:5:10: internal compiler error: in expand_direct_optab_fn, at
internal-fn.c:2171
a += __builtin_popcountl(l);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0x105813d7 expand_direct_optab_fn
../../gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:2171
0x1058205f expand_internal_call
../../gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:2314
0x1058205f expand_internal_call(gcall*)
../../gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:2322
0x10306a17 expand_call_stmt
../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.c:2550
0x10306a17 expand_gimple_stmt_1
../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3525
0x10306a17 expand_gimple_stmt
../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3688
0x10309d93 expand_gimple_basic_block
../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5694
0x10310327 execute
../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.c:6309
>From gcc-bugs-return-504165-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:21:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504165-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22008 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:21:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21949 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:21:04 -0000
From: "su at cs dot ucdavis.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-knI74Yf52g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03092.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2051
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Zhendong Su <su at cs dot ucdavis.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su <su at cs dot ucdavis.edu> ---
Here is another test case for the same ICE:
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151126 (experimental) [trunk revision 230945] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn2’:
small.c:21:1: error: loop 3’s latch is missing
}
^
small.c:21:1: error: loop 5’s latch is missing
small.c:21:1: error: loop 9’s latch is missing
small.c:21:1: internal compiler error: in verify_loop_structure, at
cfgloop.c:1669
0x715d18 verify_loop_structure()
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/cfgloop.c:1669
0x96de4e checking_verify_loop_structure
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/cfgloop.h:325
0x96de4e loop_optimizer_init(unsigned int)
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/loop-init.c:106
0x96df2a rtl_loop_init
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/loop-init.c:398
0x96df2a execute
../../gcc-trunk/gcc/loop-init.c:425
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$
------------------------------------------
short a, d, f, h;
int b, c, e, g, i;
unsigned
fn1 (int p1, int p2)
{
return p2 > 1 || p1 >> p2 ? p1 : p2;
}
void
fn2 ()
{
int j;
g = f;
while (h)
{
j = a < 0 || (b = 2) ? a : 2;
j && (i = fn1 (fn1 (h, e), 3));
e = c && d;
}
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-504166-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:24:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504166-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34461 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:24:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34396 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:24:31 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-z2wYBQi9u6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03093.txt.bz2
Content-length: 478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Tom reverted the check in r30967. Closing.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504167-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:25:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504167-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37476 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:25:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37428 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:25:27 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68549] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1669
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68549-4-uhpSTaziGY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68549-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03094.txt.bz2
Content-length: 147
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r230967 actually.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504168-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:32:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504168-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61263 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:32:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61206 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 08:32:17 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68553] gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68553-4-0ftnZiAwiS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03095.txt.bz2
Content-length: 757
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 27 08:31:44 2015
New Revision: 230993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68553
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_get_mask_element): Remove.
(vect_transform_slp_perm_load): Implement in a simpler way.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c: Adjust.
* gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504169-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:46:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504169-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88703 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:46:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 88672 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:46:16 -0000
From: "yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68578] New: [5 egression] ICE on invalid template declaration and instantiation
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03096.txt.bz2
Content-length: 476
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Bug ID: 68578
Summary: [5 egression] ICE on invalid template declaration and
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de
Target Milestone: ---
>From gcc-bugs-return-504171-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:50:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504171-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40640 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:50:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40595 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:50:25 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68577] [6 Regression] ICE: in expand_direct_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:2171
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68577-4-MlYMwbM6cP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03098.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68577
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504170-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:50:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504170-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39905 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:50:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38937 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:50:04 -0000
From: "yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68578] [5 Regression] ICE on invalid template declaration and instantiation
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68578-4-in1G9Ejqet@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03097.txt.bz2
Content-length: 809
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
--- Comment #1 from Yury V. Zaytsev <yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de> ---
Affected: GCC 5.2.1, unaffected: GCC 4.9.2 and reportedly trunk.
$ cat ice.i
template <typename> struct bar foo; template <> struct foo<>:
$ g++-5 -std=c++14 -w ice.i
ice.i:1:56: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
template <typename> struct bar foo; template <> struct foo<>:
^
$ g++-4.9 -std=c++14 -w ice.i
ice.i:1:32: error: template declaration of 'bar foo'
template <typename> struct bar foo; template <> struct foo<>:
^
...
$ g++-4.9 --version
g++-4.9 (Ubuntu 4.9.2-0ubuntu1~12.04) 4.9.2
$ g++-5 --version
g++-5 (Ubuntu 5.2.1-23ubuntu1~12.04) 5.2.1 20151031
>From gcc-bugs-return-504172-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:53:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504172-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42806 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:53:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42765 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:52:59 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68573] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=<n> discarded without notice
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68573-4-T3xgG2C4ky@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68573-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03099.txt.bz2
Content-length: 583
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68573
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ftree-vectorizer-verbose=
Common Joined RejectNegative Ignore
Does nothing. Preserved for backward compatibility.
Works as designed. Use -fopt-info-vec.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:55:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46452 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:55:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45999 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:54:59 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68578] [5 Regression] ICE on invalid template declaration and instantiation
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc cf_known_to_work everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68578-4-APNgbMThEa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03100.txt.bz2
Content-length: 757
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work| |4.9.2, 6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |5.2.1
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504174-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:58:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504174-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49766 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:58:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49104 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:58:00 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68570] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68570-4-6RXlnuLUMF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03101.txt.bz2
Content-length: 834
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|ICE on valid code at -O1, |[6 Regression] ICE on valid
|-O2 and -O3 on |code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on
|x86_64-linux-gnu |x86_64-linux-gnu
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504175-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 08:59:54 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504175-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127394 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 08:59:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127346 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 08:59:50 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68563] LTO bootstrap fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68563-4-yMYDkCGlkV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03102.txt.bz2
Content-length: 659
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This was reported on the ML as a valid error. You should always use
--disable-werror when building with LTO.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504176-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:00:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504176-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130609 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:00:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129954 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 09:00:32 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63326-4-EGzWPVANKM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03103.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 08:59:55 2015
New Revision: 230999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/63326
* c-parser.c (c_parser_compound_statement_nostart): If
last_label is true, use pragma_stmt instead of pragma_compound
as second c_parser_pragma argument.
(c_parser_omp_ordered, c_parser_omp_target_update,
c_parser_omp_target_enter_data, c_parser_omp_target_exit_data): Pass
false as second argument to c_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol after
diagnosing standalone directives used in pragma_stmt context.
* parser.c (cp_parser_statement): Clear in_compound after labels.
* gcc.dg/gomp/barrier-2.c (f2): Expect another error after label.
* c-c++-common/gomp/pr63326.c: New test.
* testsuite/libgomp.c/cancel-parallel-2.c (foo): Add semicolon
in between case label and OpenMP standalone directives.
* testsuite/libgomp.c++/cancel-parallel-2.C (foo): Likewise.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr63326.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c/c-parser.c
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/barrier-2.c
trunk/libgomp/ChangeLog
trunk/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/cancel-parallel-2.C
trunk/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/cancel-parallel-2.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504178-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:01:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504178-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3300 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:01:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3239 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 09:01:53 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-sxTVJaNvJO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03105.txt.bz2
Content-length: 541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:01:20 2015
New Revision: 231000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68552
* optabs.c (expand_vec_perm_1): Move vec_shr handling from here...
(expand_vec_perm): ... here. Do it regardless of vec_perm_const_optab
or whether v0 == v1.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/optabs.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504177-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:01:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504177-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2405 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:01:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2349 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:01:27 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/68560] [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68560-4-BXgeOJzrrr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68560-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68560-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03104.txt.bz2
Content-length: 353
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504179-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:03:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504179-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8514 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:03:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8472 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:03:27 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority cf_known_to_work
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-wCzZ0Wj6FD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03106.txt.bz2
Content-length: 347
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work| |5.2.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504180-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:04:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504180-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9632 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:04:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9551 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:04:34 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68563] LTO bootstrap fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68563-4-cDeXlWgvlD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03107.txt.bz2
Content-length: 372
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> This was reported on the ML as a valid error. You should always use
> --disable-werror when building with LTO.
Ok, will do.
In the meantime, should we fix these errors in libdecnumber then since they're
legitimate?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504181-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:04:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504181-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10292 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:04:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9928 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:04:45 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/68498] Replace LOOPS_MAY_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LATCHES with LOOPS_HAVE_SINGLE_LATCH
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68498-4-eK9E6OS0cE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03108.txt.bz2
Content-length: 257
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68498
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See PR68549 and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02633.html thread
for further information on loop flags. In particular PR68549 comment 6.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504183-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:11:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504183-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32776 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:11:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32722 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:11:54 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68309] [5/6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68309-4-55mctjZOm6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68309-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68309-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03110.txt.bz2
Content-length: 558
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68309
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The ICE (on #c2 with -std=c++1y) started with r211084.
Jason, is this something easily fixable for 5.3?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504182-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:11:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504182-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31994 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:11:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31958 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:11:32 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68579] New: FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03109.txt.bz2
Content-length: 939
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
Bug ID: 68579
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Doesn't fail all the time.
By copy-pasting compile and run commands from libgomp.log, and running
target-32.exe in a loop:
...
( LD_LIBRARY_PATH=... ; for i in $(seq 1 1000); do ./target-32.exe; s=$?; if [
$s -ne 0 ]; then echo $s; fi; done )
...
I get:
...
139
139
139
139
139
139
...
So a failure rate of 0.6%.
Used revision: r23099.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504185-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:12:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504185-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37632 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:12:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36518 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:12:20 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/67941] [5/6 Regression] calls on function pointer from a captureless lambda cause ubsan warning
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67941-4-wEmFAroFA3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03112.txt.bz2
Content-length: 423
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67941
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504184-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:12:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504184-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33521 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:12:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33452 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:12:04 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68579] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68579-4-8UCpuij2HZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03111.txt.bz2
Content-length: 506
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
confirmed: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-11/msg00799.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-504186-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:20:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504186-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62822 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:20:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62774 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:20:23 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68579] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68579-4-SfeXidqj5x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03113.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1535
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backtrace:
...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7ffff6f7a700 (LWP 6717)]
gomp_task_maybe_wait_for_dependencies (depend=depend@entry=0x7ffff6f79dd0)
at src/libgomp/task.c:1551
1551 if (next_task->kind == GOMP_TASK_WAITING)
(gdb) bt
#0 gomp_task_maybe_wait_for_dependencies (depend=depend@entry=0x7ffff6f79dd0)
at src/libgomp/task.c:1551
#1 0x00007ffff794b746 in
GOMP_target_enter_exit_data (device=<optimized out>, mapnum=3,
hostaddrs=0x7ffff6f79db0, sizes=0x6012e0
<.omp_data_sizes.35>, kinds=0x6012d0
<.omp_data_kinds.36>, flags=2,
depend=0x7ffff6f79dd0)
at src/libgomp/target.c:1691
#2 0x0000000000400ca9 in main._omp_fn ()
#3 0x00007ffff7943cb6 in gomp_thread_start (xdata=<optimized out>)
at src/libgomp/team.c:119
#4 0x00007ffff77169ca in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#5 0x00007ffff747245d in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
...
This valgrind output suggests that next_task is NULL:
...
==13885== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==13885== Access not within mapped region at address 0x58
==13885== at 0x514E2FD: gomp_task_maybe_wait_for_dependencies (task.c:1551)
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-504187-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:22:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504187-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95505 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:22:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95474 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:22:23 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68579] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68579-4-novNQeess6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03114.txt.bz2
Content-length: 219
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36853
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36853&action=edit
valgrind output
>From gcc-bugs-return-504188-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:26:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504188-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94998 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:26:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94921 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:26:11 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/68470] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal Compiler Error observed by g++-4.9.2 and a few other versions (reported to Debian)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68470-4-ClCKeMIEhs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03115.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2318
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, so the issue is the non-split part doesn't return but we keep and wire
the original return block (duplicated into the split part) into the
split-return
part of the main function. That leaves us with stmts that have no defs for
their uses. The following works for me.
Index: gcc/ipa-split.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/ipa-split.c (revision 230998)
+++ gcc/ipa-split.c (working copy)
@@ -1205,7 +1205,6 @@ split_function (basic_block return_bb, s
edge e;
edge_iterator ei;
tree retval = NULL, real_retval = NULL, retbnd = NULL;
- bool split_part_return_p = false;
bool with_bounds = chkp_function_instrumented_p (current_function_decl);
gimple *last_stmt = NULL;
unsigned int i;
@@ -1246,12 +1245,16 @@ split_function (basic_block return_bb, s
args_to_pass.safe_push (arg);
}
- /* See if the split function will return. */
+ /* See if the split function or the main part will return. */
+ bool main_part_return_p = false;
+ bool split_part_return_p = false;
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, return_bb->preds)
- if (bitmap_bit_p (split_point->split_bbs, e->src->index))
- break;
- if (e)
- split_part_return_p = true;
+ {
+ if (bitmap_bit_p (split_point->split_bbs, e->src->index))
+ split_part_return_p = true;
+ else
+ main_part_return_p = true;
+ }
/* Add return block to what will become the split function.
We do not return; no return block is needed. */
@@ -1295,6 +1298,11 @@ split_function (basic_block return_bb, s
else
bitmap_set_bit (split_point->split_bbs, return_bb->index);
+ /* If the main part doesn't return pretend the return block wasn't
+ found for all of the following. */
+ if (! main_part_return_p)
+ return_bb = EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun);
+
/* If RETURN_BB has virtual operand PHIs, they must be removed and the
virtual operand marked for renaming as we change the CFG in a way that
tree-inline is not able to compensate for.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504189-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:36:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504189-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30900 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:36:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30384 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 09:36:52 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68312] [6 Regression] Memory leaks in cilkplus
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68312-4-1iMXtZBQ33@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03116.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1487
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:36:20 2015
New Revision: 231001
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231001&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix memory leak in cilk
PR c++/68312
* c-array-notation.c (fix_builtin_array_notation_fn):
Use release_vec_vec instead of vec::release.
(build_array_notation_expr): Likewise.
(fix_conditional_array_notations_1): Likewise.
(fix_array_notation_expr): Likewise.
(fix_array_notation_call_expr): Likewise.
PR c++/68312
* cp-array-notation.c (expand_sec_reduce_builtin):
Likewise.
(create_array_refs): Replace argument with const reference.
(expand_an_in_modify_expr): Likewise.
(cp_expand_cond_array_notations): Likewise.
(expand_unary_array_notation_exprs): Likewise.
PR c++/68312
* array-notation-common.c (cilkplus_extract_an_triplets):
Release vector of vectors.
* cilk.c (gimplify_cilk_spawn): Free allocated memory.
PR c++/68312
* vec.h (release_vec_vec): New function.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-family/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-family/array-notation-common.c
trunk/gcc/c-family/cilk.c
trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c/c-array-notation.c
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c
trunk/gcc/vec.h
>From gcc-bugs-return-504190-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:42:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504190-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47031 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:42:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46972 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:42:47 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68578] [5 Regression] ICE on invalid template declaration and instantiation
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68578-4-P4CBzrEDie@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03117.txt.bz2
Content-length: 293
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
>From gcc-bugs-return-504192-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:50:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504192-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6489 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:50:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6049 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:50:31 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68506] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-9ZNegm5608@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03119.txt.bz2
Content-length: 421
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed. Thanks for the testcase
>From gcc-bugs-return-504191-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:50:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504191-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5206 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:50:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5132 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 09:50:10 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68506] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68506-4-W1pDTAR3NR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03118.txt.bz2
Content-length: 747
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Nov 27 09:49:38 2015
New Revision: 231003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68506: Fix emitting order of insns in
IF-THEN-JOIN case
PR rtl-optimization/68506
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_cmove_arith): Try emitting the else basic block
first if emit_a exists or then_bb modifies 'b'. Reindent if-else
blocks.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68506.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68506.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ifcvt.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504193-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:52:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504193-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32036 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:52:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31992 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:52:14 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67625] [4.9/5 Regression] some constexpr expressions rejected as enumerator value
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-67625-4-zWEoKzHKsf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67625-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67625-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03120.txt.bz2
Content-length: 890
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67625
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[5 Regression] some |[4.9/5 Regression] some
|constexpr expressions |constexpr expressions
|rejected as enumerator |rejected as enumerator
|value |value
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This regressed with my r207924, and got fixed with r230365 (aka delayed folding
merge).
Jason, any ideas about this? Of course delayed folding is not backportable.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504194-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:59:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504194-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64994 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:59:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 57525 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:59:07 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68570] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68570-4-34WNhiDAEb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03121.txt.bz2
Content-length: 408
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r229384.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504195-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:59:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504195-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77435 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 09:59:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72841 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 09:59:22 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68580] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03122.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
Bug ID: 68580
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I can't yet reproduce this failure on the command line.
Still, it seems to happen once in a while, for -O2 here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-08/msg00147.html .
AFAIU, given the dg-shouldfail, the failure actually means that once in a while
the executable succeeds and fails to give the expected warning and runtime
error.
Expected warning (which is combined with return status 66):
...
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=17100)
Read of size 4 at 0x000000601544 by thread T1:
#0 baz3 src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c:46
(pr65400-1.exe+0x000000400cbb)
#1 baz5 src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c:61
(pr65400-1.exe+0x000000400d71)
#2 tf src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c:68
(pr65400-1.exe+0x000000400d97)
Previous write of size 4 at 0x000000601544 by main thread:
#0 main src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c:79
(pr65400-1.exe+0x000000400e12)
Location is global 'v' of size 4 at 0x000000601544
(pr65400-1.exe+0x000000601544)
Thread T1 (tid=17102, running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors.cc:876
(libtsan.so.0+0x00000002af04)
#1 main src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c:77
(pr65400-1.exe+0x000000400dea)
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race
src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c:46 in baz3
==================
ThreadSanitizer: reported 1 warnings
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-504196-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:00:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504196-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124538 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:00:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124473 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:00:09 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68576] scev failed for loop auto parallelize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68576-4-7ajH8ZrOK6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03123.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1067
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think the issue is that with respect to loop 4 the evolution is
_76 = { 1 + _373, + , 1 }_4
but with all the casting we end up with
(set_scalar_evolution
instantiated_below = 5
(scalar = _470)
(scalar_evolution = {(unsigned long) stride.92_29 + (unsigned long)
offset.93_35, +, (unsigned long) stride.92_29}_1))
)
and instantiate_scev for the SCEV above fails. Likewise for instantiate
below 10, only below 15 succeeds in the end.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504197-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:24:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504197-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29253 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:24:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29225 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:24:37 -0000
From: "yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68581] New: ICE in build_conditional_expr_1 upon instantiation of a templated function with Cilk+ directives (valid code)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03124.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3052
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68581
Bug ID: 68581
Summary: ICE in build_conditional_expr_1 upon instantiation of
a templated function with Cilk+ directives (valid
code)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Affected: GCC 4.9.3, GCC 5.2.1.
The ICE only happens with -fcilkplus, without it everything is fine.
$ cat ice.i
#include <cilk/cilk.h>
struct x{};
template<typename>
void parallel() {
const auto &lambda = [] () {};
true ? lambda() : cilk_spawn lambda();
cilk_sync;
}
int main() {
parallel<x>();
}
$ g++-5 -std=c++11 -fcilkplus ice.i
ice.i: In instantiation of ‘void parallel() [with <template-parameter-1-1> =
x]’:
ice.i:13:17: required from here
ice.i:8:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
true ? lambda() : cilk_spawn lambda();
^
0xa9aa9f crash_signal
../../src/gcc/toplev.c:383
0x5ec65d build_conditional_expr_1
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:4739
0x5ed6ec build_conditional_expr(unsigned int, tree_node*, tree_node*,
tree_node*, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:5148
0x6890e3 build_x_conditional_expr(unsigned int, tree_node*, tree_node*,
tree_node*, int)
../../src/gcc/cp/typeck.c:6109
0x6130ed tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool,
bool)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:15416
0x61a6f2 tsubst_expr
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:14553
0x619856 tsubst_expr
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:13964
0x619fe4 tsubst_expr
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:13950
0x61a63c tsubst_expr
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:14136
0x6193a7 instantiate_decl(tree_node*, int, bool)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:20583
0x62e08b instantiate_pending_templates(int)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c:20700
0x649220 cp_write_global_declarations()
../../src/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4465
$ g++-4.9 -std=c++11 -fcilkplus ice.i
ice.i: In instantiation of ‘void parallel() [with <template-parameter-1-1> =
x]’:
ice.i:13:17: required from here
ice.i:8:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
true ? lambda() : cilk_spawn lambda();
^
$ g++-5 -std=c++11 ice.i
ice.i: In function ‘void parallel()’:
ice.i:8:34: error: -fcilkplus must be enabled to use ‘_Cilk_spawn’
true ? lambda() : cilk_spawn lambda();
^
$ g++-4.9 -std=c++11 ice.i
ice.i: In function ‘void parallel()’:
ice.i:8:34: error: -fcilkplus must be enabled to use ‘_Cilk_spawn’
true ? lambda() : cilk_spawn lambda();
^
$ g++-5 --version
g++-5 (Ubuntu 5.2.1-23ubuntu1~14.04.2) 5.2.1 20151031
$ g++-4.9 --version
g++-4.9 (Ubuntu 4.9.3-5ubuntu1~14.04) 4.9.3
>From gcc-bugs-return-504198-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:27:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504198-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38344 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:27:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38295 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:27:07 -0000
From: "yroux at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-d9MUbrzXwM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03125.txt.bz2
Content-length: 571
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
Yvan Roux <yroux at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Yvan Roux <yroux at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Kyrill,
I don't manage to reproduce the ICE with the given testcase, the pattern my
build generates is *mulsidi3adddi_v6 and not *mulsidi3siaddsi_round_v6 (I
compiled with -O2 -mcpu=cortex-a15).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504200-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:37:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504200-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52737 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:37:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52668 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:37:23 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68580] FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68580-4-W3htLJ7gbe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03127.txt.bz2
Content-length: 280
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #0)
> I can't yet reproduce this failure on the command line.
That includes 10000 iterations of running the executable, for both -O2 and -O0.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504199-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:37:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504199-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51994 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:37:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51958 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:37:10 -0000
From: "yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/63693] ICE in resolve_typename_type
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-63693-4-flkUG4Ums1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63693-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63693-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03126.txt.bz2
Content-length: 750
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693
Yury V. Zaytsev <yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yury.zaytsev@traveltainment
| |.de
--- Comment #6 from Yury V. Zaytsev <yury.zaytsev at traveltainment dot de> ---
Just stumbled upon this ICE in my code on GCC 5.2.1:
$ cat ice.i
template<typename T>
void foo(T obj) {
using local_type = decltype(obj)::element_type::other_type
}
Do I understand it correctly that this will only be fixed for GCC 6.x, and not
for GCC 4.x/5.x?
Many thanks!
>From gcc-bugs-return-504201-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:38:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504201-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53726 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:38:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53689 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:38:25 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68579] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68579-4-CD0SJczAEV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03128.txt.bz2
Content-length: 578
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36854
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36854&action=edit
gcc6-pr68579.patch
Untested fix.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504202-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:54:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504202-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106681 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 10:54:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 106636 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 10:54:51 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67702-4-7sFHmyf7nJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03129.txt.bz2
Content-length: 508
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This regressed with r217949. Jason, any ideas on this?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504203-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:01:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504203-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114797 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:01:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114728 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:00:55 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-ou63jo3W0o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03130.txt.bz2
Content-length: 349
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, I can definitely still reproduce based on today's trunk.
I'm using an arm-none-eabi compiler configured with
--without-isl --with-float=hard --with-cpu=cortex-a15 --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4
--with-float=hard --enable-checking=yes
>From gcc-bugs-return-504204-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:03:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504204-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11769 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:03:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11709 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:03:07 -0000
From: "dvyukov at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68580] FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dvyukov at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68580-4-eE9xDytBZj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03131.txt.bz2
Content-length: 468
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> ---
If you change types of:
int v;
int q;
int o;
to 'long long', does it fix the failure?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504205-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:07:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504205-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16413 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:07:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16380 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:07:17 -0000
From: "palves at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68582] New: -Wunused-function doesn't warn about unused static __attribute__((noreturn)) functions
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03132.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1208
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
Bug ID: 68582
Summary: -Wunused-function doesn't warn about unused static
__attribute__((noreturn)) functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: palves at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
With:
$ gcc6 -v:
...
GNU C11 (GCC) version 6.0.0 20151117 (experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
...
This warns, as expected:
$ cat not-used.c
void abort(void);
static void foo (void) { abort (); }
int main () {return 0;}
$ gcc6 not-used.c -o not-used -Wunused-function
not-used.c:2:13: warning: ‘foo’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static void foo (void) { abort (); }
^~~
Adding __attribute__((noreturn)) to foo silences the warning:
$ cat not-used.c
void abort(void);
static __attribute__((noreturn)) void foo (void) { abort (); }
int main () {return 0;}
$ gcc6 not-used.c -o not-used -Wunused-function
$
Couldn't find this documented in the manual.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504206-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:10:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504206-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32611 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:10:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32493 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:10:16 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68580] FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68580-4-qFEV6315ev@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03133.txt.bz2
Content-length: 351
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #2)
> If you change types of:
>
> int v;
> int q;
> int o;
>
> to 'long long', does it fix the failure?
As long as I don't have a reliable way to reproduce the failure, I can't answer
that question.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504207-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:10:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504207-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33961 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:10:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33791 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:10:37 -0000
From: "palves at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68582] -Wunused-function doesn't warn about unused static __attribute__((noreturn)) functions
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68582-4-7ozwUR2P2n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03134.txt.bz2
Content-length: 199
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
--- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
Same thing with gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-7) (GCC) [Fedora 20].
>From gcc-bugs-return-504208-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:18:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504208-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40544 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:18:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40478 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:18:08 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68553] gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68553-4-6MUdh1sdCc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03135.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504209-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:18:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504209-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41323 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:18:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41278 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 11:18:23 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68553] gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68553-4-8old7yj1tU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03136.txt.bz2
Content-length: 593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 27 11:17:51 2015
New Revision: 231006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68553
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_create_mask_and_perm): Skip VEC_PERM_EXPR
generation for 1:1 permutations.
(vect_transform_slp_perm_load): Detect 1:1 permutations.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504210-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:18:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504210-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42015 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:18:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41711 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:18:31 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-4SZdCpWIEE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03137.txt.bz2
Content-length: 966
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You probably need to tweak gcc-interface/Makefile.in (Sparc Linux):
ifeq ($(strip $(shell $(GCC_FOR_TARGET) $(GNATLIBCFLAGS)
-print-multi-os-directory)),../lib64)
LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS = \
$(LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS_COMMON) $(LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS_64)
else
LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS = \
$(LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS_COMMON) $(LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS_32)
endif
to make it pick the right system.ads file.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504211-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:22:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504211-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44552 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:22:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44519 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:22:23 -0000
From: "martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4-F0T1Zob4JT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03138.txt.bz2
Content-length: 397
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
--- Comment #1 from Martin Reinecke <martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de> ---
I should probably add that building the trunk was possible without any problems
on Linux Mint until about two weeks ago. Unfortunately I do not know yet how to
isolate the problematic commit ... will look into "git bisect" and post updates
if I have more information.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504212-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:36:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504212-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96134 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:36:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96068 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:36:09 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68578] [5 Regression] ICE on invalid template declaration and instantiation
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68578-4-vvNy8a0WGE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03139.txt.bz2
Content-length: 568
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems this has regressed with r226657, but couldn't reproduce it after the
corresponding trunk commit on the trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504213-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:39:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504213-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101251 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:39:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101183 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:39:05 -0000
From: "yroux at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-AcMaTjploL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03140.txt.bz2
Content-length: 495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux <yroux at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #5)
> Hmm, I can definitely still reproduce based on today's trunk.
> I'm using an arm-none-eabi compiler configured with
> --without-isl --with-float=hard --with-cpu=cortex-a15 --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4
> --with-float=hard --enable-checking=yes
Ok, mine is on yesterday's trunk and arm-linux-gnueabihf, but I'll retry from
scratch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504214-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:45:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504214-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119545 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:45:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 119466 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:45:14 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc
Message-ID: <bug-68343-4-13KLbBq5f5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68343-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68343-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03141.txt.bz2
Content-length: 471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2015-11-13 00:00:00 |2015-11-27
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm also seeing these fails on arm with ISL version 0.14
>From gcc-bugs-return-504215-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 11:56:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504215-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127978 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 11:56:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127921 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 11:56:23 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67477] [6 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2388
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67477-4-5FzYIOyI0u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03142.txt.bz2
Content-length: 635
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67477
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Cannot reproduce on trunk any more.
Not sure where it got fixed though.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504216-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:12:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504216-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33572 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:12:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33520 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:12:40 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/37150] basic-block vectorization misses some unrolled loops
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-37150-4-WY4fgDZeGG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-37150-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-37150-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03143.txt.bz2
Content-length: 801
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37150
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #15)
> Created attachment 29738 [details]
> maybe smaller testcase version ?
>
> Attached is what I think is roughly the smallest kernel of this type that we
> have in the code. I checked this is at least partially vectorized with
> ifort, but not so with gfortran trunk. It is still not such a small
> testcase, I'm afraid.
With BB vectorization enhancement this still doesn't vectorize because the
four remaining stores in the function are not grouped.
The non-reduced testcase has the same issue.
I suppose to much scalarization has happened and we don't consider candidates
that do not end in a vector write to memory.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504217-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:13:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504217-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34505 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:13:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34430 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 12:13:07 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68250-4-VHh1mvgkVr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03144.txt.bz2
Content-length: 454
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 12:12:35 2015
New Revision: 231009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231009&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68250
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68250.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68250.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504218-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:14:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504218-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37059 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:14:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36625 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 12:14:20 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68250-4-8Oey3QsWL3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03145.txt.bz2
Content-length: 486
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 12:13:48 2015
New Revision: 231010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231010&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68250
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68250.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68250.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504219-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:15:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504219-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40751 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:15:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40654 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:15:32 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68250] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68250-4-G14cntIVDM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68250-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03146.txt.bz2
Content-length: 487
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68250
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68194 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504220-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:15:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504220-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40778 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:15:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40707 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:15:34 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68194-4-cgRa4l02A2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03147.txt.bz2
Content-length: 182
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504221-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:30:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504221-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93258 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:29:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93211 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:29:55 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68583] New: [5/6 Regression] Missed if-conversion
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03148.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1315
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
Bug ID: 68583
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Missed if-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We don't if-convert
void foo (long *a)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i+=2)
{
if (a[i] == 0)
{
a[i+1] = 2;
a[i] = 3;
}
else
{
a[i+1] = 3;
a[i] = 4;
}
}
}
even though both a[i] and a[i+1] are written to unconditionally. We only
keep a base_master to see if sth is writable but if we'd have separate
read-unconditionally and write-unconditionally flags from the master_dr
we could handle the above just fine. That would require the master_dr
entry to be associated with two different predicates, one for
reads and writes (for read-or-written-unconditionally) and one for writes
only (for written-unconditionally).
PR56624 suggests this missed if-conversion is a regression which it is
as GCC 4.9 and GCC 5.1.0 happily if-convert it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504222-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:30:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504222-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96266 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:30:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95902 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:30:54 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68583] [5/6 Regression] Missed if-conversion
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc cf_known_to_work target_milestone everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68583-4-eXuF6pCJ9K@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03149.txt.bz2
Content-length: 768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68583
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot co
| |m
Known to work| |4.9.3, 5.1.0
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |5.2.0, 6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504223-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:32:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504223-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98832 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:32:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98803 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:32:49 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68582] -Wunused-function doesn't warn about unused static __attribute__((noreturn)) functions
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68582-4-FusGCIBBp5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03150.txt.bz2
Content-length: 544
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504224-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:35:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504224-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105772 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:35:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105746 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:34:57 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68582] -Wunused-function doesn't warn about unused static __attribute__((noreturn)) functions
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68582-4-tjqKdzDV5y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03151.txt.bz2
Content-length: 703
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68582
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Probably because noreturn uses the volatile bit, TREE_THIS_VOLATILE:
/* Warn about static fns or vars defined but not used. */
if (((warn_unused_function && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
|| (((warn_unused_variable && ! TREE_READONLY (decl))
|| (warn_unused_const_variable && TREE_READONLY (decl)))
&& TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL))
&& ! DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (decl)
...
/* A volatile variable might be used in some non-obvious way. */
&& ! TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (decl)
this flag check should be gated on VAR_DECLs.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504225-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:52:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504225-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24977 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:52:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24941 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:51:59 -0000
From: "gk at torproject dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/64320] Missing config.h during findcomp.cc compilation
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gk at torproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64320-4-M9kglbtT0z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64320-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64320-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03152.txt.bz2
Content-length: 476
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64320
Georg Koppen <gk at torproject dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gk at torproject dot org
--- Comment #3 from Georg Koppen <gk at torproject dot org> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2)
> Please try this patch:
This solves the issue for me.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504226-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 12:59:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504226-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66776 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 12:59:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66737 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 12:59:17 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68563] LTO bootstrap fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68563-4-mG7kmWd7VT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03153.txt.bz2
Content-length: 167
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68563
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
LTO bootstrap on aarch64-linux with --disable-werror passes.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504227-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 13:00:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504227-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73499 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 13:00:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73414 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 13:00:26 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68577] [6 Regression] ICE: in expand_direct_optab_fn, at internal-fn.c:2171
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68577-4-Hr8Fk9hzu9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03154.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1723
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68577
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bet this started with r230475 or so.
The problem is that these builtins are in scalar form always returning int, but
take some argument of wider bitsize.
The vectorizer thinks the target can handle narrowing conversion builtin, and
thus emits:
vect_l.17_53 = [vec_unpack_lo_expr] vect_vec_iv_.15_49;
vect_l.17_54 = [vec_unpack_hi_expr] vect_vec_iv_.15_49;
vect__7.18_55 = POPCOUNT (vect_l.17_53, vect_l.17_54);
where vec_l.17 has V2DImode, and vect__7.18 has V4SImode.
But at least the power8 popcountv2di2 pattern takes a single V2DImode argument
(rather than 2 V2DImode arguments) and returns a V2DImode result, while the
caller expects one that takes two V2DImode arguments and produces 4 results in
V4SImode vector for that.
So, first of all, what do we expect from the backends, shall they implement
these popcount<mode>2 expanders for vector modes as returning the result in the
same mode as the single argument (then the vectorizer needs to be told about
that and needs to do the narrowing manually, do e.g. in the above case do
POPCOUNT on each V2DImode argument separately, then combine the two V2DImode
results as for long -> int vectorized conversion. Or they need to do something
different, but then the question is if it should be called popcountv2di2 if it
actually takes 2 arguments rather than 1, etc.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504228-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 13:08:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504228-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97900 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 13:08:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97875 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 13:08:51 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68214] gcc.dg/cwsc1.c fails on arm-none-eabi
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68214-4-csZP7pOfDt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03155.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1331
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68214
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
How was the compiler configured?
The testcases passes for me with a recent trunk.
Compiling it with a arm-none-eabi compiler with -march=armv4t -mthumb
-mfloat-abi=softfp (for example) gives:
main:
push {r4, lr}
sub sp, sp, #8
mov r3, sp
adds r4, r3, #7
ldr r3, .L5
ldr r3, [r3]
mov ip, r4
bl .L7
cmp r0, r4
bne .L4
movs r0, #0
add sp, sp, #8
@ sp needed
pop {r4}
pop {r1}
bx r1
.L4:
bl abort
.L6:
.align 2
.L5:
.word .LANCHOR0
.size main, .-main
.global ptr
.data
.align 2
.set .LANCHOR0,. + 0
.type ptr, %object
.size ptr, 4
ptr:
.word foo
.ident "GCC: (unknown) 6.0.0 20151127 (experimental)"
.text
.code 16
.align 1
.L7:
bx r3
>From gcc-bugs-return-504229-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 13:12:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504229-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113303 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 13:12:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113257 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 13:12:01 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68214] gcc.dg/cwsc1.c fails on arm-none-eabi
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68214-4-XoBbJ5tesN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03156.txt.bz2
Content-length: 515
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68214
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh, it needs -mcpu=arm7tdmi -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft -marm.
confirmed
>From gcc-bugs-return-504230-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 13:26:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504230-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130564 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 13:26:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130467 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 13:26:13 -0000
From: "martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4-m5deJaL7iv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03157.txt.bz2
Content-length: 730
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
--- Comment #2 from Martin Reinecke <martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de> ---
OK, the problematic commit appears to be:
Revision 230759 - Directory Listing
Added Mon Nov 23 14:23:59 2015 UTC (3 days, 23 hours ago) by dje
Correct graphite*.c ISL header file inclusion order.
* system.h: Don't poison calloc and strdup if USES_ISL is defined.
* graphite-dependences.c: Define USES_ISL. Include ISL header files
after GCC header files and before graphite header files.
* graphite-dependences.c: Same.
* graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c: Same.
* graphite-optimize-isl.c: Same.
* graphite-poly.c: Same.
* graphite-scop-detection.c: Same.
* graphite-sese-to-poly.c: Same.
* graphite.c: Same.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504231-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 13:34:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504231-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7543 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 13:34:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130317 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 13:34:17 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-4acMT3NcwJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03158.txt.bz2
Content-length: 313
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36855
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36855&action=edit
patch
proposed patch; check for the multiarch string before checking for the
directory name.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504232-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:08:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504232-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1035 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:08:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 998 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 14:08:55 -0000
From: "vehre at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68218] ALLOCATE with size given by a module function
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68218-4-X6q1mGkq0z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03159.txt.bz2
Content-length: 897
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68218
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:08:23 2015
New Revision: 231014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-11-27 Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68218
* trans-array.c (gfc_array_init_size): Add gfc_evaluate_now() when
array spec in allocate is a function call.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-11-27 Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68218
* gfortran.dg/allocate_with_arrayspec_1.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_with_arrayspec_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504233-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:16:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504233-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94855 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:16:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94823 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:16:39 -0000
From: "Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68584] New: nested generic lambda with trailing return type cases compiler crash
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68584-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03160.txt.bz2
Content-length: 924
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68584
Bug ID: 68584
Summary: nested generic lambda with trailing return type cases
compiler crash
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36856
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36856&action=edit
backtrace
the following code causes a crash:
//auto F = [](auto){return 1; };
auto call = [](auto/*int*/) {
auto F = [](auto){return 1; };
return [=](auto /*int*/ x) -> decltype( F(x) ) { return F(x);};
};
int main(){
call(1);
}
It has been tested with g++-5.2 and g++-6.0(20151122).
Might be related to bugID:66135 and bugID:61814
>From gcc-bugs-return-504234-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:17:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504234-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97077 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:17:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96958 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:17:40 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68559] Excessive peeling for gaps
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68559-4-aOQH7fd1TU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03161.txt.bz2
Content-length: 429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504235-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:17:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504235-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97153 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:17:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97023 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:17:41 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-53947-4-0BTiO6Yl4H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53947-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53947-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03162.txt.bz2
Content-length: 452
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 68559, which changed state.
Bug 68559 Summary: Excessive peeling for gaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
>From gcc-bugs-return-504236-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:18:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504236-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101111 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:18:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98610 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 14:18:00 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68559] Excessive peeling for gaps
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68559-4-WSbXxqak5j@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03163.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:17:28 2015
New Revision: 231015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/68559
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_group_access_1): Move
peeling for gap checks ...
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_load): ... here and relax
for SLP.
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_2): Re-set
LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS before re-trying without SLP.
* gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c: Adjust again.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504237-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:19:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504237-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103151 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:19:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103005 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:19:38 -0000
From: "Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68584] nested generic lambda with trailing return type cases compiler crash
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68584-4-aUIhTNYk1Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68584-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68584-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03164.txt.bz2
Content-length: 181
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68584
--- Comment #1 from Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com <Gaetano.Checinski at gmail dot com> ---
clang compiles this examples
>From gcc-bugs-return-504238-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:34:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504238-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14777 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:34:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14723 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:34:07 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68585] New: [5/6 Regression] c++14 code accepted by 4.9 not accepted by 5 and 6
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68585-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03165.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3061
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68585
Bug ID: 68585
Summary: [5/6 Regression] c++14 code accepted by 4.9 not
accepted by 5 and 6
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
is this code which shouldn't be accepted by 4.9?
$ cat tst.cc
#include <array>
#include <utility>
struct Pos
{
unsigned l,c,a;
//fix g++
// constexpr Pos(unsigned l, unsigned c, unsigned a)
// : l(l), c(c), a(a)
// {}
};
template<class T, T... Ints>
constexpr std::array<Pos, 9*9> make_grid_position(std::integer_sequence<T,
Ints...>)
{
return std::array<Pos, 9*9>{Pos{Ints / 9, Ints % 9, (Ints / 9) / 3 * 3 +
(Ints % 9) / 3}...};
}
constexpr std::array<Pos, 9*9> make_grid_positions()
{
return make_grid_position(std::make_index_sequence<9*9>{});
}
template<class T>
void generate_sudoku(T)
{
constexpr std::array<Pos, 9*9> positions = make_grid_positions(); // fail
}
int main()
{
constexpr std::array<Pos, 9*9> positions = make_grid_positions(); // ok
generate_sudoku(1);
}
$ g++ -std=gnu++14 tst.cc
tst.cc: In instantiation of 'void generate_sudoku(T) [with T = int]':
tst.cc:34:20: required from here
tst.cc:28:66: error: 'std::array<Pos, 81ul>{std::__array_traits<Pos,
81ul>::_Type{Pos{0u, 0u, 0u}, Pos{0u, 1u, 0u}, Pos{0u, 2u, 0u}, Pos{0u, 3u,
1u}, Pos{0u, 4u, 1u}, Pos{0u, 5u, 1u}, Pos{0u, 6u, 2u}, Pos{0u, 7u, 2u},
Pos{0u, 8u, 2u}, Pos{1u, 0u, 0u}, Pos{1u, 1u, 0u}, Pos{1u, 2u, 0u}, Pos{1u, 3u,
1u}, Pos{1u, 4u, 1u}, Pos{1u, 5u, 1u}, Pos{1u, 6u, 2u}, Pos{1u, 7u, 2u},
Pos{1u, 8u, 2u}, Pos{2u, 0u, 0u}, Pos{2u, 1u, 0u}, Pos{2u, 2u, 0u}, Pos{2u, 3u,
1u}, Pos{2u, 4u, 1u}, Pos{2u, 5u, 1u}, Pos{2u, 6u, 2u}, Pos{2u, 7u, 2u},
Pos{2u, 8u, 2u}, Pos{3u, 0u, 3u}, Pos{3u, 1u, 3u}, Pos{3u, 2u, 3u}, Pos{3u, 3u,
4u}, Pos{3u, 4u, 4u}, Pos{3u, 5u, 4u}, Pos{3u, 6u, 5u}, Pos{3u, 7u, 5u},
Pos{3u, 8u, 5u}, Pos{4u, 0u, 3u}, Pos{4u, 1u, 3u}, Pos{4u, 2u, 3u}, Pos{4u, 3u,
4u}, Pos{4u, 4u, 4u}, Pos{4u, 5u, 4u}, Pos{4u, 6u, 5u}, Pos{4u, 7u, 5u},
Pos{4u, 8u, 5u}, Pos{5u, 0u, 3u}, Pos{5u, 1u, 3u}, Pos{5u, 2u, 3u}, Pos{5u, 3u,
4u}, Pos{5u, 4u, 4u}, Pos{5u, 5u, 4u}, Pos{5u, 6u, 5u}, Pos{5u, 7u, 5u},
Pos{5u, 8u, 5u}, Pos{6u, 0u, 6u}, Pos{6u, 1u, 6u}, Pos{6u, 2u, 6u}, Pos{6u, 3u,
7u}, Pos{6u, 4u, 7u}, Pos{6u, 5u, 7u}, Pos{6u, 6u, 8u}, Pos{6u, 7u, 8u},
Pos{6u, 8u, 8u}, Pos{7u, 0u, 6u}, Pos{7u, 1u, 6u}, Pos{7u, 2u, 6u}, Pos{7u, 3u,
7u}, Pos{7u, 4u, 7u}, Pos{7u, 5u, 7u}, Pos{7u, 6u, 8u}, Pos{7u, 7u, 8u},
Pos{7u, 8u, 8u}, Pos{8u, 0u, 6u}, Pos{8u, 1u, 6u}, Pos{8u, 2u, 6u}, Pos{8u, 3u,
7u}, Pos{8u, 4u, 7u}, Pos{8u, 5u, 7u}, Pos{8u, 6u, 8u}, Pos{8u, 7u, 8u},
Pos{8u, 8u, 8u}}}' is not a constant expression
constexpr std::array<Pos, 9*9> positions = make_grid_positions(); // fail
^
>From gcc-bugs-return-504239-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:36:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504239-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21922 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:36:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21883 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 14:36:18 -0000
From: "vehre at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68218] ALLOCATE with size given by a module function
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68218-4-jR6jUru3MD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03166.txt.bz2
Content-length: 905
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68218
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:35:46 2015
New Revision: 231017
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-11-27 Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68218
* trans-array.c (gfc_array_init_size): Add gfc_evaluate_now() when
array spec in allocate is a function call.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-11-27 Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68218
* gfortran.dg/allocate_with_arrayspec_1.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_with_arrayspec_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>From gcc-bugs-return-504240-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:45:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504240-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48484 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:45:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48417 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:45:36 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68570] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68570-4-lRzgmquWt0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68570-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03167.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1422
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68570
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, we have:
basic block 13, loop depth 1
pred: 11
_24 = (int) m_23(D);
i_lsm.22_91 = _24;
i_lsm.23_92 = 1;
_43 = _24 <= 0;
_45 = (int) _43;
succ: 14
basic block 14, loop depth 1
pred: 19
13
# prephitmp_42 = PHI <pretmp_52(19), _24(13)>
# i_lsm.22_58 = PHI <i_lsm.22_57(19), i_lsm.22_91(13)>
# i_lsm.23_60 = PHI <i_lsm.23_59(19), i_lsm.23_92(13)>
if (prephitmp_42 != 0)
goto <bb 20>;
else
goto <bb 15>;
succ: 20
15
and #line 2164 "../../gcc/match.pd is applied, we get:
# prephitmp_42 = PHI <pretmp_52(19), _24(13)>
# i_lsm.22_58 = PHI <i_lsm.22_57(19), i_lsm.22_91(13)>
# i_lsm.23_60 = PHI <i_lsm.23_59(19), i_lsm.23_92(13)>
if (_24 != 0)
goto <bb 20>;
else
goto <bb 15>;
succ: 20
15
which is wrong IL, as _24 is is used in a bb not dominated by its definition.
Perhaps it is optimized this way because match.pd sees that bb19 is unreachable
or something similar, lots of the conditions are folded into 1 != 0 or 0 != 0.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504241-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:49:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504241-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51440 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:49:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51368 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 14:48:59 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/61233] Demangler crash (GDB PR 16957)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61233-4-KdSycEd6ED@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03168.txt.bz2
Content-length: 5359
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61233
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:48:21 2015
New Revision: 231020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/61321 - demangler crash on casts in template parameters
The fix for bug 59195:
[C++ demangler handles conversion operator incorrectly]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
unfortunately makes the demangler crash due to infinite recursion, in
case of casts in template parameters.
For example, with:
template<int> struct A {};
template <typename Y> void function_temp(A<sizeof ((Y)(999))>) {}
template void function_temp<int>(A<sizeof (int)>);
The 'function_temp<int>' instantiation above mangles to:
_Z13function_tempIiEv1AIXszcvT_Li999EEE
The demangler parses this as:
typed name
template
name 'function_temp'
template argument list
builtin type int
function type
builtin type void
argument list
template (*)
name 'A'
template argument list
unary operator
operator sizeof
unary operator
cast
template parameter 0 (**)
literal
builtin type int
name '999'
And after the fix for 59195, due to:
static void
d_print_cast (struct d_print_info *dpi, int options,
const struct demangle_component *dc)
{
...
/* For a cast operator, we need the template parameters from
the enclosing template in scope for processing the type. */
if (dpi->current_template != NULL)
{
dpt.next = dpi->templates;
dpi->templates = &dpt;
dpt.template_decl = dpi->current_template;
}
when printing the template argument list of A (what should be "<sizeof
(int)>"), the template parameter 0 (that is, "T_", the '**' above) now
refers to the first parameter of the the template argument list of the
'A' template (the '*' above), exactly what we were already trying to
print. This leads to infinite recursion, and stack exaustion. The
template parameter 0 should actually refer to the first parameter of
the 'function_temp' template.
Where it reads "for the cast operator" in the comment in d_print_cast
(above), it's really talking about a conversion operator, like:
struct A { template <typename U> explicit operator U(); };
We don't want to inject the template parameters from the enclosing
template in scope when processing a cast _expression_, only when
handling a conversion operator.
The problem is that DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST is currently ambiguous,
and means _both_ 'conversion operator' and 'cast expression'.
Fix this by adding a new DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION component type,
which does what DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST does today, and making
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST just simply print its component subtree.
I think we could instead reuse DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST and in
d_print_comp_inner still do:
@@ -5001,9 +5013,9 @@ d_print_comp_inner (struct d_print_info *dpi, int
options,
d_print_comp (dpi, options, dc->u.s_extended_operator.name);
return;
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST:
d_append_string (dpi, "operator ");
- d_print_cast (dpi, options, dc);
+ d_print_conversion (dpi, options, dc);
return;
leaving the unary cast case below calling d_print_cast, but seems to
me that spliting the component types makes it easier to reason about
the code.
g++'s testsuite actually generates three symbols that crash the
demangler in the same way. I've added those as tests in the demangler
testsuite as well.
And then this fixes PR other/61233 too, which happens to be a
demangler crash originally reported to GDB, at:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16957
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
Also ran this through GDB's testsuite. GDB will require a small
update to use DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION in one place it's using
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST in its sources.
libiberty/
2015-11-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR other/61321
PR other/61233
* demangle.h (enum demangle_component_type)
<DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION>: New value.
* cp-demangle.c (d_demangle_callback, d_make_comp): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
(is_ctor_dtor_or_conversion): Handle DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION
instead of DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST.
(d_operator_name): Return a DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION
component if handling a conversion.
(d_count_templates_scopes, d_print_comp_inner): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
(d_print_comp_inner): Handle DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION instead
of DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST.
(d_print_cast): Rename as ...
(d_print_conversion): ... this. Adjust comments.
(d_print_cast): Rewrite - simply print the left subcomponent.
* cp-demint.c (cplus_demangle_fill_component): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
* testsuite/demangle-expected: Add tests.
Modified:
trunk/include/demangle.h
trunk/libiberty/ChangeLog
trunk/libiberty/cp-demangle.c
trunk/libiberty/cp-demint.c
trunk/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
>From gcc-bugs-return-504242-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:49:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504242-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51558 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:49:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51359 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 14:48:59 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/59195] C++ demangler handles conversion operator incorrectly
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ccoutant at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59195-4-QTBgEqF7M9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59195-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59195-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03169.txt.bz2
Content-length: 5359
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:48:21 2015
New Revision: 231020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/61321 - demangler crash on casts in template parameters
The fix for bug 59195:
[C++ demangler handles conversion operator incorrectly]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
unfortunately makes the demangler crash due to infinite recursion, in
case of casts in template parameters.
For example, with:
template<int> struct A {};
template <typename Y> void function_temp(A<sizeof ((Y)(999))>) {}
template void function_temp<int>(A<sizeof (int)>);
The 'function_temp<int>' instantiation above mangles to:
_Z13function_tempIiEv1AIXszcvT_Li999EEE
The demangler parses this as:
typed name
template
name 'function_temp'
template argument list
builtin type int
function type
builtin type void
argument list
template (*)
name 'A'
template argument list
unary operator
operator sizeof
unary operator
cast
template parameter 0 (**)
literal
builtin type int
name '999'
And after the fix for 59195, due to:
static void
d_print_cast (struct d_print_info *dpi, int options,
const struct demangle_component *dc)
{
...
/* For a cast operator, we need the template parameters from
the enclosing template in scope for processing the type. */
if (dpi->current_template != NULL)
{
dpt.next = dpi->templates;
dpi->templates = &dpt;
dpt.template_decl = dpi->current_template;
}
when printing the template argument list of A (what should be "<sizeof
(int)>"), the template parameter 0 (that is, "T_", the '**' above) now
refers to the first parameter of the the template argument list of the
'A' template (the '*' above), exactly what we were already trying to
print. This leads to infinite recursion, and stack exaustion. The
template parameter 0 should actually refer to the first parameter of
the 'function_temp' template.
Where it reads "for the cast operator" in the comment in d_print_cast
(above), it's really talking about a conversion operator, like:
struct A { template <typename U> explicit operator U(); };
We don't want to inject the template parameters from the enclosing
template in scope when processing a cast _expression_, only when
handling a conversion operator.
The problem is that DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST is currently ambiguous,
and means _both_ 'conversion operator' and 'cast expression'.
Fix this by adding a new DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION component type,
which does what DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST does today, and making
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST just simply print its component subtree.
I think we could instead reuse DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST and in
d_print_comp_inner still do:
@@ -5001,9 +5013,9 @@ d_print_comp_inner (struct d_print_info *dpi, int
options,
d_print_comp (dpi, options, dc->u.s_extended_operator.name);
return;
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST:
d_append_string (dpi, "operator ");
- d_print_cast (dpi, options, dc);
+ d_print_conversion (dpi, options, dc);
return;
leaving the unary cast case below calling d_print_cast, but seems to
me that spliting the component types makes it easier to reason about
the code.
g++'s testsuite actually generates three symbols that crash the
demangler in the same way. I've added those as tests in the demangler
testsuite as well.
And then this fixes PR other/61233 too, which happens to be a
demangler crash originally reported to GDB, at:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16957
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
Also ran this through GDB's testsuite. GDB will require a small
update to use DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION in one place it's using
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST in its sources.
libiberty/
2015-11-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR other/61321
PR other/61233
* demangle.h (enum demangle_component_type)
<DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION>: New value.
* cp-demangle.c (d_demangle_callback, d_make_comp): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
(is_ctor_dtor_or_conversion): Handle DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION
instead of DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST.
(d_operator_name): Return a DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION
component if handling a conversion.
(d_count_templates_scopes, d_print_comp_inner): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
(d_print_comp_inner): Handle DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION instead
of DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST.
(d_print_cast): Rename as ...
(d_print_conversion): ... this. Adjust comments.
(d_print_cast): Rewrite - simply print the left subcomponent.
* cp-demint.c (cplus_demangle_fill_component): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
* testsuite/demangle-expected: Add tests.
Modified:
trunk/include/demangle.h
trunk/libiberty/ChangeLog
trunk/libiberty/cp-demangle.c
trunk/libiberty/cp-demint.c
trunk/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
>From gcc-bugs-return-504243-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:49:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504243-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51595 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:49:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51373 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 14:48:59 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61321-4-mjKvkFYyIV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03170.txt.bz2
Content-length: 5360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Nov 27 14:48:21 2015
New Revision: 231020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/61321 - demangler crash on casts in template parameters
The fix for bug 59195:
[C++ demangler handles conversion operator incorrectly]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
unfortunately makes the demangler crash due to infinite recursion, in
case of casts in template parameters.
For example, with:
template<int> struct A {};
template <typename Y> void function_temp(A<sizeof ((Y)(999))>) {}
template void function_temp<int>(A<sizeof (int)>);
The 'function_temp<int>' instantiation above mangles to:
_Z13function_tempIiEv1AIXszcvT_Li999EEE
The demangler parses this as:
typed name
template
name 'function_temp'
template argument list
builtin type int
function type
builtin type void
argument list
template (*)
name 'A'
template argument list
unary operator
operator sizeof
unary operator
cast
template parameter 0 (**)
literal
builtin type int
name '999'
And after the fix for 59195, due to:
static void
d_print_cast (struct d_print_info *dpi, int options,
const struct demangle_component *dc)
{
...
/* For a cast operator, we need the template parameters from
the enclosing template in scope for processing the type. */
if (dpi->current_template != NULL)
{
dpt.next = dpi->templates;
dpi->templates = &dpt;
dpt.template_decl = dpi->current_template;
}
when printing the template argument list of A (what should be "<sizeof
(int)>"), the template parameter 0 (that is, "T_", the '**' above) now
refers to the first parameter of the the template argument list of the
'A' template (the '*' above), exactly what we were already trying to
print. This leads to infinite recursion, and stack exaustion. The
template parameter 0 should actually refer to the first parameter of
the 'function_temp' template.
Where it reads "for the cast operator" in the comment in d_print_cast
(above), it's really talking about a conversion operator, like:
struct A { template <typename U> explicit operator U(); };
We don't want to inject the template parameters from the enclosing
template in scope when processing a cast _expression_, only when
handling a conversion operator.
The problem is that DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST is currently ambiguous,
and means _both_ 'conversion operator' and 'cast expression'.
Fix this by adding a new DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION component type,
which does what DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST does today, and making
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST just simply print its component subtree.
I think we could instead reuse DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST and in
d_print_comp_inner still do:
@@ -5001,9 +5013,9 @@ d_print_comp_inner (struct d_print_info *dpi, int
options,
d_print_comp (dpi, options, dc->u.s_extended_operator.name);
return;
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST:
d_append_string (dpi, "operator ");
- d_print_cast (dpi, options, dc);
+ d_print_conversion (dpi, options, dc);
return;
leaving the unary cast case below calling d_print_cast, but seems to
me that spliting the component types makes it easier to reason about
the code.
g++'s testsuite actually generates three symbols that crash the
demangler in the same way. I've added those as tests in the demangler
testsuite as well.
And then this fixes PR other/61233 too, which happens to be a
demangler crash originally reported to GDB, at:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16957
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
Also ran this through GDB's testsuite. GDB will require a small
update to use DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION in one place it's using
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST in its sources.
libiberty/
2015-11-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR other/61321
PR other/61233
* demangle.h (enum demangle_component_type)
<DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION>: New value.
* cp-demangle.c (d_demangle_callback, d_make_comp): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
(is_ctor_dtor_or_conversion): Handle DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION
instead of DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST.
(d_operator_name): Return a DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION
component if handling a conversion.
(d_count_templates_scopes, d_print_comp_inner): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
(d_print_comp_inner): Handle DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION instead
of DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CAST.
(d_print_cast): Rename as ...
(d_print_conversion): ... this. Adjust comments.
(d_print_cast): Rewrite - simply print the left subcomponent.
* cp-demint.c (cplus_demangle_fill_component): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONVERSION.
* testsuite/demangle-expected: Add tests.
Modified:
trunk/include/demangle.h
trunk/libiberty/ChangeLog
trunk/libiberty/cp-demangle.c
trunk/libiberty/cp-demint.c
trunk/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
>From gcc-bugs-return-504244-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:53:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504244-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62884 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:53:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62854 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:53:25 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68312] [6 Regression] Memory leaks in cilkplus
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68312-4-mN7LNEKnmq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03171.txt.bz2
Content-length: 442
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504247-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:56:55 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504247-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68469 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:56:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68321 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:56:50 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-61321-4-mVjFsqp294@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03174.txt.bz2
Content-length: 442
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504245-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:56:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504245-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66984 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:56:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66731 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:56:19 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/61233] Demangler crash (GDB PR 16957)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-61233-4-keaFMS8JPl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03172.txt.bz2
Content-length: 518
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61233
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504246-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 14:56:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504246-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67727 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 14:56:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67683 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 14:56:42 -0000
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68586] New: [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly rejected
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03173.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68586
Bug ID: 68586
Summary: [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly
rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following valid code snippet is wrongly rejected on trunk (6.0.0 20151122):
====================================
enum E { x = 1, y = x << 1 };
template<E> struct A {};
A<x> a;
====================================
bug.cc:5:4: error: invalid conversion from 'int' to 'E' [-fpermissive]
A<x> a;
^
During reduction from a larger testcase I had to tweak the settings
of the garbage collector (--param ggc-min-expand=0) to make it appear reliably.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504248-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:15:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504248-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67593 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:15:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 67534 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:15:14 -0000
From: "wam at hiwaay dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68427] GCC (G++) flunks legal ANSI-C code
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wam at hiwaay dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68427-4-6T0ac0K5gE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03175.txt.bz2
Content-length: 612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #6 from wam at hiwaay dot net ---
I see this is labelled as resolved. That is *NOT* true for me. All versions of
gcc on FreeBSD 9.3R that I have tried (4.8.5, 4.9.4, 5.2.0, 5.2.1) still
reproduce this bug as of today. I pkg-upgraded all versions last evening &
tried them this A.M. The header files are where they are supposed to be (&
where intel's ICC is able to find them), etc. Intel's ICC is able to compile
this stuff cleanly nightly under FC14 64-bit across my LAN, no problems. I am
stuck under FreeBSD until this gets fixed :-( ....
>From gcc-bugs-return-504249-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:16:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504249-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69593 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:16:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69549 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:16:25 -0000
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4-9TZ51Yx1sa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03176.txt.bz2
Content-length: 612
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have the same problem on an OpenSUSE 13.1 distribution.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504250-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:17:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504250-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72330 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:17:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72243 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:17:28 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68587] New: [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6974
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03177.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1717
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
Bug ID: 68587
Summary: [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in expand_insn, at
optabs.c:6974
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36857
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36857&action=edit
test.ii, compile with: g++ -Ofast -fsanitize=undefined
Very recently, GCC 6 compiled the big program - since today it fails with an
ICE.
Compile the reduced program with:
g++ -Ofast -fsanitize=undefined -S test.ii
It fails here with:
test27.ii: In member function ‘int MSMeasurement::compareWithGrid(const
MSMeasurement&, const ECoordinate&, const ECoordinate&) const’:
test27.ii:128:28: internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6974
double fa=floor(a/g);
^
0xc2c143 expand_insn(insn_code, unsigned int, expand_operand*)
../../gcc/optabs.c:6974
0xb026a4 expand_direct_optab_fn
../../gcc/internal-fn.c:2147
0x91c69a expand_call_stmt
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:2565
0x91c69a expand_gimple_stmt_1
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:3525
0x91c69a expand_gimple_stmt
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:3688
0x91f25a expand_gimple_basic_block
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:5694
0x924b46 execute
../../gcc/cfgexpand.c:6309
>From gcc-bugs-return-504251-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:18:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504251-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74364 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:18:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74295 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:18:03 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68587] [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6974
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68587-4-JD4m8mcVRx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03178.txt.bz2
Content-length: 360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
>From gcc-bugs-return-504252-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:19:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504252-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76729 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:19:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76707 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:19:37 -0000
From: "petr at kalinin dot nnov.ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68588] New: GCC requires constexpr for template non-type parameter, even though constexpr conversion operator exists
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: petr at kalinin dot nnov.ru
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68588-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03179.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1780
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68588
Bug ID: 68588
Summary: GCC requires constexpr for template non-type
parameter, even though constexpr conversion operator
exists
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: petr at kalinin dot nnov.ru
Target Milestone: ---
Consider the following code:
struct A {
constexpr operator int() { return 42; }
};
template <int>
void foo() {}
void bar(A a) {
foo<a>();
}
int main() {
foo<A{}>();
const int i = 42;
foo<i>(); // (1)
A a{};
static_assert(i == a, "");
bar(a);
foo<a>(); // error here
}
Clang 3.7 with c++14 accepts this, while gcc 5.2.0 with c++14 (by "g++
--std=c++14 b.cpp -o b") does not, producing the following message:
b.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
b.cpp:22:9: error: the value of ‘a’ is not usable in a constant expression
foo<a>(); // error here
^
b.cpp:18:7: note: ‘a’ was not declared ‘constexpr’
A a{};
^
This behavior of GCC seems at at least strange, as it allows "a" in
static_assert, as well in bar(), but not directly in foo<a>. Moreover,
A::operator int() is declared constexpr and does not evaluate any class
members, therefore use of "a" should be converted constant expression.
----
This is from my question
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33957274/type-conversion-at-template-non-type-argument-without-constexpr/33958291.
The last sentence here is reworded from Serge Ballesta's answer there.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504253-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:22:05 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504253-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90401 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:22:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90320 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:21:58 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68214] gcc.dg/cwsc1.c fails on arm-none-eabi
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status assigned_to cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68214-4-cBRMo6LypP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68214-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03180.txt.bz2
Content-length: 540
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68214
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail| |6.0
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mine.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504254-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:23:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504254-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91911 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:23:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91882 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:23:02 -0000
From: "petr at kalinin dot nnov.ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68588] GCC requires constexpr for template non-type parameter, even though constexpr conversion operator exists
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: petr at kalinin dot nnov.ru
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68588-4-h7q3dp4O26@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68588-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68588-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03181.txt.bz2
Content-length: 206
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68588
--- Comment #1 from pkalinin <petr at kalinin dot nnov.ru> ---
[Attribution was incorrect, the last sentence is reworded from Columbo's
answer. Sorry.]
>From gcc-bugs-return-504255-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:25:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504255-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94267 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:25:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94185 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:24:57 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68587] [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6974
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68587-4-rjE0FCabHE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03182.txt.bz2
Content-length: 192
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The options can be reduced to:
g++ -O1 -ffast-math -fsanitize=null
>From gcc-bugs-return-504257-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:38:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504257-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4380 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:38:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4116 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:38:22 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-6wkQ948NiW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03184.txt.bz2
Content-length: 459
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 68587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504256-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:38:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504256-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4185 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:38:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4069 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:38:21 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68587] [6 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6974
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68587-4-VxS7YOEZCM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03183.txt.bz2
Content-length: 616
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68587
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
has nothing to do with sanitizer. dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68432 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504258-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:39:15 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504258-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5960 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:39:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5903 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:39:11 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-b2birDHdYf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03185.txt.bz2
Content-length: 330
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32)
> reduced testcase:
..however this is not "our" bug, so there's no known reason to keep this PR
open, right?
.. if no-one objects by Monday 30th, then let's close it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504259-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 15:55:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504259-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78238 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 15:55:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78186 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 15:55:07 -0000
From: "mrs at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63773-4-5OTMcvmyVY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03186.txt.bz2
Content-length: 385
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #34 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, for bugs that aren't fixed, sometimes we work around them. We can use this
bug to track things like the vendor bug status (fixed or not), and potential
workarounds. Plus, we can list this bug in the documentation for _why_ the
compiler doesn't work.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504260-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:03:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504260-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95690 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:03:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95424 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:03:13 -0000
From: "Torsten at Robitzki dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/61039] Using a constexpr's address as a template variable produces an unnecessary warning
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Torsten at Robitzki dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-61039-4-XYYx71Ong0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61039-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03187.txt.bz2
Content-length: 430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61039
Torsten Robitzki <Torsten at Robitzki dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Torsten at Robitzki dot de
--- Comment #1 from Torsten Robitzki <Torsten at Robitzki dot de> ---
I see the same issue already with 4.8.4.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504261-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:15:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504261-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58887 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:15:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58827 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:15:22 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68432] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:6947
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68432-4-tK6YXhGBqm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03188.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1282
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10)
> Series finally posted here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg03020.html
Part 05's gcc/genattrtab.c changes do not apply. (All other parts and the
chunks for other files in Part 05 do with some line-offset fuzzy.)
That's a bit surprising as git lists r229184 of 2015-10-22 as latest change for
that file while the patch set was posted on 2015-11-25. - Six of the
gcc/genattrtab.c chunks do not apply and none of them looks trivial.
For instance, the patch changes:
@@ -4770,6 +4804,7 @@ gen_insn_reserv (md_rtx_info *info)
memset (&attr, 0, sizeof (attr));
attr.name = DEF_ATTR_STRING (XSTR (def, 0));
attr.loc = info->loc;
+ attr.type = AT_INSN;
decl->name = DEF_ATTR_STRING (XSTR (def, 0));
decl->default_latency = XINT (def, 1);
But in the trunk, I only see:
4753 gen_insn_reserv (md_rtx_info *info)
4754 {
4755 struct insn_reserv *decl = oballoc (struct insn_reserv);
4756 rtx def = info->def;
4757
4758 decl->name = DEF_ATTR_STRING (XSTR (def, 0));
4759 decl->default_latency = XINT (def, 1);
>From gcc-bugs-return-504262-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:21:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504262-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63783 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:21:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 63721 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:21:24 -0000
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4-r8moP0sA3k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03189.txt.bz2
Content-length: 851
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |spop at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
See also
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3CCAOckXuNOxnRswh06njeTzSDwZsacXv45vojN3kEB76fTNodfoQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E>.
Unfortunately, one has to revert a number of patches before being able to
revert r230759.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504263-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:37:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504263-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36437 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:37:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30932 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:37:45 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68501] [6 Regression] sqrt builtin is not used anymore
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68501-4-iHAq5XJsuG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03190.txt.bz2
Content-length: 641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36858
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36858&action=edit
gcc6-pr68501.patch
Untested fix. The problem is that the vector SQRT is now an internal call, and
in that case targetm.builtin_reciprocal is not called at all.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504264-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:39:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504264-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62062 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:39:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62036 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:39:44 -0000
From: "bacon at cs dot nyu.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68589] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bacon at cs dot nyu.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03191.txt.bz2
Content-length: 7371
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68589
Bug ID: 68589
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bacon at cs dot nyu.edu
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36859
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36859&action=edit
Preprocessor output
Here is the command line and output:
$ gcc -v -save-temps -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP
-I../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl
-I../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/..
-I../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/../.. -I../.. -I../../..
-DOPERATION_mp_bases -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wc++-compat
-Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wmissing-noreturn -c
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn/mp_bases.c -o mp_bases.o
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
Target: x86_64-pc-cygwin
Configured with:
/cygdrive/i/szsz/tmpp/gcc/gcc-4.9.3-1.x86_64/src/gcc-4.9.3/configure
--srcdir=/cygdrive/i/szsz/tmpp/gcc/gcc-4.9.3-1.x86_64/src/gcc-4.9.3
--prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/gcc --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/gcc/html -C
--build=x86_64-pc-cygwin --host=x86_64-pc-cygwin --target=x86_64-pc-cygwin
--without-libiconv-prefix --without-libintl-prefix --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--enable-shared --enable-shared-libgcc --enable-static
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-bootstrap --enable-__cxa_atexit
--with-dwarf2 --with-tune=generic
--enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-graphite
--enable-threads=posix --enable-libatomic --enable-libgomp --disable-libitm
--enable-libquadmath --enable-libquadmath-support --enable-libssp
--enable-libada --enable-libgcj-sublibs --disable-java-awt --disable-symvers
--with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/ecj.jar --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
--with-cloog-include=/usr/include/cloog-isl --without-libiconv-prefix
--without-libintl-prefix --with-system-zlib --enable-linker-build-id
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.3 (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=gnu99' '-D' 'HAVE_CONFIG_H' '-I'
'.' '-I' '../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn' '-I' '..' '-D'
'__GMP_WITHIN_GMP' '-I' '../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl' '-I'
'../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/..' '-I'
'../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/../..' '-I' '../..' '-I' '../../..'
'-D' 'OPERATION_mp_bases' '-g' '-O2' '-Wall' '-Wextra' '-Wcast-qual'
'-Wc++-compat' '-Wpointer-arith' '-Wbad-function-cast' '-Wcast-align'
'-Wwrite-strings' '-Wstrict-prototypes' '-Wmissing-prototypes'
'-Wmissing-declarations' '-Wsuggest-attribute=format'
'-Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn' '-c' '-o' 'mp_bases.o' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/cc1.exe -E -quiet -v -I . -I
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn -I .. -I
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl -I
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/.. -I
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/../.. -I ../.. -I ../../.. -Dunix
-idirafter
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../lib/../include/w32api
-idirafter
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/lib/../lib/../../include/w32api
-D HAVE_CONFIG_H -D __GMP_WITHIN_GMP -D OPERATION_mp_bases
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn/mp_bases.c -mtune=generic
-march=x86-64 -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wc++-compat -Wpointer-arith
-Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wsuggest-attribute=format
-Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn -g -fworking-directory -O2 -fpch-preprocess -o
mp_bases.i
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/lib/../lib/../../include/w32api"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
.
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn
..
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/..
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/../..
../..
../../..
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/include-fixed
/usr/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/../../../../lib/../include/w32api
End of search list.
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=gnu99' '-D' 'HAVE_CONFIG_H' '-I'
'.' '-I' '../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn' '-I' '..' '-D'
'__GMP_WITHIN_GMP' '-I' '../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl' '-I'
'../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/..' '-I'
'../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/../..' '-I' '../..' '-I' '../../..'
'-D' 'OPERATION_mp_bases' '-g' '-O2' '-Wall' '-Wextra' '-Wcast-qual'
'-Wc++-compat' '-Wpointer-arith' '-Wbad-function-cast' '-Wcast-align'
'-Wwrite-strings' '-Wstrict-prototypes' '-Wmissing-prototypes'
'-Wmissing-declarations' '-Wsuggest-attribute=format'
'-Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn' '-c' '-o' 'mp_bases.o' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.3/cc1.exe -fpreprocessed mp_bases.i -quiet
-dumpbase mp_bases.c -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip mp_bases.o -g
-O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wc++-compat -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast
-Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wsuggest-attribute=format -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn
-std=gnu99 -version -o mp_bases.s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.9.3 (x86_64-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.9.3, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version
3.1.2-p11, MPC version 1.0.3
warning: GMP header version 6.0.0 differs from library version 6.1.0.
warning: MPFR header version 3.1.2-p11 differs from library version 3.1.3.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
GNU C (GCC) version 4.9.3 (x86_64-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.9.3, GMP version 6.0.0, MPFR version
3.1.2-p11, MPC version 1.0.3
warning: GMP header version 6.0.0 differs from library version 6.1.0.
warning: MPFR header version 3.1.2-p11 differs from library version 3.1.3.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: a4f229e78ffcbdb1991422330833e931
../../../../../setl-2.3.5/src/run/gmp-setl/mpn/mp_bases.c:2143:12: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
/* 1 */ {0, 1e37, 0, 0},
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
The same segfault occurs if the .i file (attached) is renamed as t.c and then
submitted for compilation using the same gcc invocation as above but without
all the preprocessor-directed options (-I and -D).
Thanks for your attention to this. GCC rocks!
dB
>From gcc-bugs-return-504265-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:42:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504265-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81849 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:42:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81774 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:42:35 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68361] [6 regression] Bootstrap failure with --enable-checking=release
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68361-4-KG618SX7Lo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68361-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68361-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03192.txt.bz2
Content-length: 387
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68361
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So fixed?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504266-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:54:36 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504266-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93912 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:54:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93843 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:54:32 -0000
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4-IjdsU5Rukf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03193.txt.bz2
Content-length: 371
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
One needs to upgrade to ISL 0.14 or 0.15.
The earlier inclusion ordering of ISL header files in graphite source files
were wrong and did not follow GCC requirements. It worked on Mint and OpenSUSE
because GCC header file requirements were violated.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504267-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 16:58:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504267-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 101030 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 16:58:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100351 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 16:58:01 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68349] [6 regression] ice in decompose_normal_address with -O2 at rtlanal.c:6086
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68349-4-tXp5UZWtkr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68349-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68349-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03194.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68349
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems this is LRA on
(insn 84 145 162 3 (set (reg:SI 183 [180])
(plus:SI (plus:SI (subreg:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
(const_int 16 [0x10])) 0)
(subreg:SI (reg:DI 168) 0))
(const_int 303 [0x12f]))) 212 {*leasi}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 20 frame)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 168)
(nil))))
where supposedly the lea is not used for address computation, but just as a
fancy arithmetics computation.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504268-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 17:08:19 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504268-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113626 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 17:08:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 113546 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 17:08:14 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-MbyXJdpZrY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03195.txt.bz2
Content-length: 360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The problem of the segmentation fault is in base == NULL in lra_emit_add but
the real root of the problem is in processing insn operators for subreg
reloading.
I'll have a patch today and commit it in trunk if everything is ok.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504269-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 17:41:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504269-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48510 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 17:41:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 48439 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 17:41:25 -0000
From: "Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/68540] 6.0 build process broken on Linux Mint, potential include ordering problem
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68540-4-S0ht7on5jo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03196.txt.bz2
Content-length: 694
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz
| |.ch
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
graphite without recent ISL is not a good idea, graphite before 0.15 (certainly
not 0.12) could lead to exponential memory and cpu time requirements, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852#c19
>From gcc-bugs-return-504270-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 17:47:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504270-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58967 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 17:47:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58914 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 17:47:46 -0000
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68218] ALLOCATE with size given by a module function
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68218-4-YERofPIx4M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03197.txt.bz2
Content-length: 585
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68218
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk, 5-branch, and 4-branch. Thanks for patch. Closing PR.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504271-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 18:09:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504271-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3509 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 18:09:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3463 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 18:09:19 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68383-4-cdRLzmlydB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03198.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1856
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
markus@x4 libiberty % ./a.out
_ZSt7forwardIRKZN5Write14DataMapGrammarISt20back_insert_iteratorISsEEC4EvEUlRT_E_EOS5_RNSt16remove_referenceIS5_E4typeE
typed name
template
qualified name
name 'std'
name 'forward'
template argument list
reference
const
local name
typed name
qualified name
template
qualified name
name 'Write'
name 'DataMapGrammar'
template argument list
template
qualified name
name 'std'
name 'back_insert_iterator'
template argument list
standard substitution std::string
constructor 4
name 'DataMapGrammar'
function type
argument list
lambda 0
argument list
reference
template parameter 0
function type
rvalue reference
template parameter 0
argument list
reference
qualified name
template
qualified name
standard substitution std
name 'remove_reference'
template argument list
template parameter 0
name 'type'
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=================================================================
==12223==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-overflow on address 0x7ffe00004e88 (pc
0x0000004046fd bp 0x0fffc0000a20 sp 0x7ffe00004e80 T0)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504272-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 18:16:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504272-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8841 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 18:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8785 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 18:15:57 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-rTPbHe9YU9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03199.txt.bz2
Content-length: 504
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|ada fails to bootstrap on |Ada fails to bootstrap on
|sparc64-linux-gnu |sparc64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The patch is OK for mainline and 5 branch, thanks.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504273-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 18:26:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504273-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34158 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 18:26:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33707 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 18:26:45 -0000
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68536] LRA ICEs with new arm pattern
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68536-4-A41xI5viAY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03200.txt.bz2
Content-length: 593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 27 18:26:12 2015
New Revision: 231021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-27 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/68536
* lra.c (lra_emit_add): Add code for null base.
* lra-constraints.c (curr_insn_transform): Skip operators for
subreg reloads.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c
trunk/gcc/lra.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504274-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 19:12:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504274-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115336 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 19:12:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115292 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 19:12:06 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68427] GCC (G++) flunks legal ANSI-C code
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68427-4-aerHAkvh1X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03201.txt.bz2
Content-length: 718
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, the problem is a bug in your code, not GCC.
Your StdIO.h file has this header guard:
#ifndef _STDIO_H_
#define _STDIO_H_
That clashes with the name of the header guard in /usr/include/stdio.h so the
contents of your StdIO.h are ignored if <stdio.h> has already been included
You should not be using a name like _STDIO_H_ in your code, all names starting
with _[A-Z_] are reserved for the implementation, for any purpose. Defining a
macro with that name results in undefined behaviour, meaning your code is not
valid ANSI C and is not valid ISO C++.
So you need to fix your header.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504275-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 19:22:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504275-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125512 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 19:21:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125480 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 19:21:56 -0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68586] [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly rejected
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68586-4-bIcOkl3sOO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03202.txt.bz2
Content-length: 526
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68586
Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
| |com
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> ---
Looks like a regression compared to gcc 5.2.0 to me.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504276-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 19:25:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504276-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14646 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 19:25:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14595 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 19:25:49 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68427] GCC (G++) flunks legal ANSI-C code
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68427-4-uUJMtAA9Eg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03203.txt.bz2
Content-length: 706
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Similarly, _STD_C_H_ is not a valid header guard in StdC.h, and _ASSERT0_H_ is
not valid in Assert.h, and _GAUSS_H_ is not valid in gauss.h
Same goes for
# define __ASSERT_FUNCTION ((__const char *) 0)
I don't know what the point of this is:
#ifdef __linux__ // Linux :-) ....
#include <malloc.h>
#elif defined __FreeBSD__ // FreeBSD & SGI :-) ....
#include <unistd.h> // typedef uint :-) ....
#endif
But the <malloc.h> header is deprecated and you should include <stdlib.h>
The code has a number of problems, but GCC is not the cause.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504277-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 19:31:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504277-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19078 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 19:31:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19034 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 19:31:46 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-sZ9u3FyjVT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03204.txt.bz2
Content-length: 509
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > Created attachment 36847 [details]
> > gcc6-pr68552.patch
>
> I have started a bootstrap + regtest with the above patch on alpha-linux-gnu
> native, please expect results in ~10 hours.
The regression test didn't yet finish, but all regressed test were OK with the
patched compiler.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504278-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 19:34:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504278-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27563 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 19:34:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27524 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 19:34:05 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/68579] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-32.c execution test
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68579-4-aaMUTmoveI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68579-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03205.txt.bz2
Content-length: 519
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68579
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 19:33:33 2015
New Revision: 231023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/68579
* task.c (gomp_task_run_post_handle_depend_hash): New forward decl.
(gomp_create_target_task): Call it before freeing
GOMP_TARGET_TASK_DATA tasks.
Modified:
trunk/libgomp/ChangeLog
trunk/libgomp/task.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504279-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 19:43:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504279-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36623 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 19:43:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36589 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 19:43:19 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68552] [5/6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68552-4-Gx6MZLBM2t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68552-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03206.txt.bz2
Content-length: 573
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 27 19:42:47 2015
New Revision: 231024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68552
* optabs.c (expand_vec_perm_1): Move vec_shr handling from here...
(expand_vec_perm): ... here. Do it regardless of vec_perm_const_optab
or whether v0 == v1.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/optabs.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504280-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 20:53:08 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504280-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18488 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 20:53:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18459 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 20:53:04 -0000
From: "bacon at cs dot nyu.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68589] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 20:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bacon at cs dot nyu.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68589-4-Z0W8qqg61l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03207.txt.bz2
Content-length: 222
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68589
--- Comment #1 from David Bacon <bacon at cs dot nyu.edu> ---
Version 5.2.0 of gcc for the same Cygwin 64-bit platform fails in the same way
on the same source line.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504281-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 22:19:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504281-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24818 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 22:19:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24797 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 22:19:13 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68590] New: FAIL: gnat.dg/loop_optimization19.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Index_Check"
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03208.txt.bz2
Content-length: 632
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68590
Bug ID: 68590
Summary: FAIL: gnat.dg/loop_optimization19.adb
scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Index_Check"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With r231009
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,java,objc,obj-c++,ada
>From gcc-bugs-return-504282-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 22:24:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504282-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91334 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 22:24:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91114 invoked by uid 55); 27 Nov 2015 22:24:16 -0000
From: "wam at hiwaay dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68427] GCC (G++) flunks legal ANSI-C code
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wam at hiwaay dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68427-4-tHWLB2pjjR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68427-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03209.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #9 from wam at hiwaay dot net ---
On 11/27/15 13:32, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Similarly, _STD_C_H_ is not a valid header guard in StdC.h, and _ASSERT0_H_ is
> not valid in Assert.h, and _GAUSS_H_ is not valid in gauss.h
>
> Same goes for
>
> # define __ASSERT_FUNCTION ((__const char *) 0)
>
>
> I don't know what the point of this is:
>
> #ifdef __linux__ // Linux :-) ....
> #include <malloc.h>
> #elif defined __FreeBSD__ // FreeBSD & SGI :-) ....
> #include <unistd.h> // typedef uint :-) ....
> #endif
>
> But the <malloc.h> header is deprecated and you should include <stdlib.h>
>
> The code has a number of problems, but GCC is not the cause.
>
Very well, you are correct .... for FreeBSD. My linux box defines
_STDIO_H in /usr/include/stdio.h (w/o trailing '_'), but FreeBSD 9.3R
has the trailing '_' .... Pilot error, but a bit subtle & hard to track
down since it was/is compiling on my linux box. Sorry for the bother, I
will address this in my headers. Thanks :-/ ....
>From gcc-bugs-return-504283-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 22:44:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504283-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123570 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 22:44:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123390 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 22:44:05 -0000
From: "torvald at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libitm/68591] New: trans-mem: missing transactional read in transaction when using -O1
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libitm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03210.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1053
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68591
Bug ID: 68591
Summary: trans-mem: missing transactional read in transaction
when using -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libitm
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36860&action=edit
test case
The attached test case miscompiles in that it does not transform the load from
ptr in the conditional in the transaction into a transactional load. Instead,
it seems to assume that ptr's value is fixed and not shared with other threads.
This changes when the synchronization that could potentially make it share
gets inlined into the function with the transaction. For simplicity, this is a
single-threaded test, but I discovered that in a multi-threaded setting.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504284-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 22:45:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504284-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124864 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 22:45:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124777 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 22:45:13 -0000
From: "torvald at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libitm/68591] trans-mem: missing transactional read in transaction when using -O1
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libitm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68591-4-8XYjkof119@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03211.txt.bz2
Content-length: 430
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68591
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Filed as libitm, but this is really a compiler problem, and not related to
libitm.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504285-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 23:09:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504285-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9966 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 23:09:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9925 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 23:09:28 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68590] FAIL: gnat.dg/loop_optimization19.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Index_Check"
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68590-4-H7AsnYq631@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03212.txt.bz2
Content-length: 659
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68590
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, it comes from:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* genmatch.c (dt_simplify::gen_1): For generic wrap all
multi-result-use captures in a SAVE_EXPR.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504286-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 27 23:10:14 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504286-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10890 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2015 23:10:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10838 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2015 23:10:10 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68590] FAIL: gnat.dg/loop_optimization19.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Index_Check"
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-68590-4-KUreBbnIu0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03213.txt.bz2
Content-length: 471
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68590
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Investigating.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504287-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 00:34:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504287-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31742 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 00:34:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31700 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 00:34:24 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68113] VLA+typeof+new -- confusing warning
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-68113-4-3X50ByXmWv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68113-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68113-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03214.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1731
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68113
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |5.2.0, 6.0
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with decltype instead of __typeof__. The 'new decltype(a)' construct
is valid provided a is not a VLA. The strange warning message is caused by gcc
not distinguishing 'new (int[n])' (a GCC extension) from 'new decltype(a)' in
the function that issues the warning (build_new_1 in cp/init.c).
$ cat x.cpp && /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc/xg++ -B /build/gcc-trunk-svn/gcc -S
-Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -std=c++11 x.cpp
int main ()
{
int n = 1;
int a [n];
new decltype (a);
}
x.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
x.cpp:4:13: warning: ISO C++ forbids variable length array ‘a’ [-Wvla]
int a [n];
^
x.cpp:5:9: warning: non-constant array new length must be specified without
parentheses around the type-id [-Wvla]
new decltype (a);
^~~~~~~~
Clang rejects the code because it doesn't allow VLAs in new expressions:
$ /build/llvm-trunk/bin/clang++ -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 x.cpp
x.cpp:5:9: error: 'new' cannot allocate object of variably modified type
'decltype(a)' (aka 'int [n]')
new decltype (a);
^
1 error generated.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504288-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 00:52:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504288-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114330 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 00:52:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112615 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 00:52:55 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/56606] GCC refuses to emit long calls for operator new/delete on PowerPC
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-56606-4-sNf8hv5cTw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03215.txt.bz2
Content-length: 748
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56606
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |powerpc64
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.7.2, 4.8.5, 6.0
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with recent trunk (6.0.0 20151125) on powerpc64le-redhat-linux-gnu.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504289-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 00:55:21 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504289-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23202 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 00:55:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23140 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 00:55:16 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/56606] GCC refuses to emit long calls for operator new/delete on PowerPC
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56606-4-7LUklLlEda@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03216.txt.bz2
Content-length: 909
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56606
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Test case and its output:
$ cat u.cpp && /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk/gcc -O2 -Wall
-Wextra -c -mlongcall u.cpp && objdump -r u.o
extern void foo();
void bar() {
foo();
new char;
}
u.o: file format elf64-powerpcle
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
0000000000000000 R_PPC64_REL16_HA .TOC.
0000000000000004 R_PPC64_REL16_LO .TOC.+0x0000000000000004
000000000000000c R_PPC64_TOC16_HA .toc
0000000000000010 R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS .toc
0000000000000030 R_PPC64_REL24 _Znwm
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.toc]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
0000000000000000 R_PPC64_ADDR64 _Z3foov
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.eh_frame]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
000000000000001c R_PPC64_REL32 .text
>From gcc-bugs-return-504290-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 01:01:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504290-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30434 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 01:01:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30397 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 01:01:23 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68592] New: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1403 with -fprofile-generate
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 01:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget cf_gccbuild
Message-ID: <bug-68592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03217.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2267
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68592
Bug ID: 68592
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1403 with -fprofile-generate
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Build: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
This ICE started to show up during LTO build of 416.gamess with
-fprofile-generate.
r230895 - OK
r230981 - ICE
$ cat gamess_min.f
PARAMETER (MXCPGA=320,ZERO=0.0)
DIMENSION CPNORM(MXCPGA),CDNORM(MXCPGA),
* CFNORM(MXCPGA)
KTYPIL = KTYPI()
DO 84 K=1,NOGTF
LMP=LMP+1
CFNORM(LMP)=ZERO
IF (KTYPIL.EQ.1) LMP=CMPILMP
IF (KTYPIL.EQ.2) CPNORM(LMP)=CMPILMP
IF (KTYPIL.EQ.3) CDNORM(LMP)=CMPILMP
IF (KTYPIL.EQ.4) LMP=CMPILMP
IF (KTYPIL.EQ.6) LMP=CMPILMP
84 CONTINUE
CALL MMPNOR(CPNORM,CDNORM,CFNORM)
END
$ f951 -Ofast -march=haswell -fprofile-generate -quiet gamess_min.f
gamess_min.f:1:0:
PARAMETER (MXCPGA=320,ZERO=0.0)
internal compiler error: in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1403
0xd777c9 vect_get_vec_def_for_operand(tree_node*, gimple*, tree_node*)
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:1403
0xd83629 vectorizable_conversion
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:3991
0xd8ed2a vect_transform_stmt(gimple*, gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*, _slp_tree*,
_slp_instance*)
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:8049
0xd94f84 vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*)
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:6858
0xdb0a17 vectorize_loops()
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:548
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504291-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 01:19:11 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504291-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55238 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 01:19:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55145 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 01:19:07 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/63159] Demangler crash
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 01:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-63159-4-6wCjKbGQrJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63159-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63159-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03218.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1528
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63159
Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed with PR61321. Now demangles as:
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::HESSIAN<PhysBAM::VECTOR<float, 3>, decltype
(PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_MAP_1<PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MUL<PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::ARG<0>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::ARG<1> >,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::VEC_MAP_1<PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MUL<PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::ARG<0>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::ARG<1> > >
>::Type((PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_HOLDER<PhysBAM::SYMMETRIC_MATRIX<float, 3>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::VEC_END, PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_END>)(),
(PhysBAM::VECTOR<float, 3>::SCALAR)()))>
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::operator*<PhysBAM::VECTOR<float, 3>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_HOLDER<PhysBAM::SYMMETRIC_MATRIX<float, 3>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::VEC_END, PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_END>
>(PhysBAM::VECTOR<float, 3>::SCALAR,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::HESSIAN<PhysBAM::VECTOR<float, 3>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_HOLDER<PhysBAM::SYMMETRIC_MATRIX<float, 3>,
PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::VEC_END, PhysBAM::HETERO_DIFF::MAT_END> > const&)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 61321 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504292-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 01:19:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504292-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55391 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 01:19:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55196 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 01:19:09 -0000
From: "miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 01:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-61321-4-75MVeY4OLT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61321-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03219.txt.bz2
Content-length: 452
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cas43 at cs dot stanford.edu
--- Comment #18 from Mikhail Maltsev <miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 63159 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-504293-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 01:38:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504293-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69612 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 01:38:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69558 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 01:37:58 -0000
From: "gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63326] whether a #pragma is a statement depends on the type of pragma
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 01:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63326-4-TFEmxGfsDK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03220.txt.bz2
Content-length: 635
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
--- Comment #22 from Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> Author: jakub
> Date: Fri Nov 27 08:59:55 2015
> New Revision: 230999
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230999&root=gcc&view=rev
This way looks OK to me.
But for C++, it has no pr63326 issue, do we still need to modify
gcc/cp/parser.c?
pr42979 is related with this issue, more or less. May this patch also fix
pr42979 by the way? If this patch really fix pr42979, we will still need
gcc/cp/parser.c (both C and C++ have pr42979 issue).
Thanks.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504294-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 02:39:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504294-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69852 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 02:39:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69811 invoked by uid 55); 28 Nov 2015 02:39:52 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-z1aJcCJQVW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03221.txt.bz2
Content-length: 483
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: doko
Date: Sat Nov 28 02:39:20 2015
New Revision: 231028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-28 Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
PR ada/68564
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Fix sparc/sparc64 bitness detection.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
>From gcc-bugs-return-504295-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 02:41:57 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504295-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71768 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 02:41:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71699 invoked by uid 55); 28 Nov 2015 02:41:53 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-czTikf1aEA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03222.txt.bz2
Content-length: 515
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: doko
Date: Sat Nov 28 02:41:20 2015
New Revision: 231029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-28 Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
PR ada/68564
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Fix sparc/sparc64 bitness detection.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
>From gcc-bugs-return-504296-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 02:43:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504296-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73092 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 02:43:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73026 invoked by uid 55); 28 Nov 2015 02:43:09 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-idjgcstn4l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03223.txt.bz2
Content-length: 519
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: doko
Date: Sat Nov 28 02:42:37 2015
New Revision: 231030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-28 Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
PR ada/68564
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in: Fix sparc/sparc64 bitness detection.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
>From gcc-bugs-return-504297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 02:44:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504297-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74316 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 02:44:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 74259 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 02:44:44 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-6426iXSXiz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03224.txt.bz2
Content-length: 458
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fixed, also checked in on the 4.9 branch.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504298-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 03:46:53 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504298-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31719 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 03:46:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31685 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 03:46:47 -0000
From: "majun4950646 at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68576] scev failed for loop auto parallelize
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 03:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: majun4950646 at 163 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68576-4-NmiB6gNWU6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03225.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68576
--- Comment #3 from majun <majun4950646 at 163 dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think the issue is that with respect to loop 4 the evolution is
>
> _76 = { 1 + _373, + , 1 }_4
>
> but with all the casting we end up with
>
> (set_scalar_evolution
> instantiated_below = 5
> (scalar = _470)
> (scalar_evolution = {(unsigned long) stride.92_29 + (unsigned long)
> offset.93_35, +, (unsigned long) stride.92_29}_1))
> )
>
> and instantiate_scev for the SCEV above fails. Likewise for instantiate
> below 10, only below 15 succeeds in the end.
Yes,it failed in CASE_CONVERT while do instantiate_scev_r.
BTW, another example is interchange-1.f:
---
subroutine foo(f1,f2,f3,f4,f5,f6,f7,f8,f9,f0,g1,g2,g3)
implicit none
integer f4,f3,f2,f1
integer g4,g5,g6,g7,g8,g9
integer i1,i2,i3,i4,i5
real*8 g1(5,f3,f2,f1),g2(5,5,f3,f2,f1),g3(5,f3,f2,f1)
real*8 f0(5,5,f3,f2,f1),f9(5,5,f3,f2,f1),f8(5,5,f3,f2,f1)
real*8 f7(5,5,f3,f2,f1),f6(5,5,f3,f2,f1),f5(5,5,f3,f2,f1)
do i3=1,f1
g8=mod(i3+f1-2,f1)+1
g9=mod(i3,f1)+1
do i4=1,f2
g6=mod(i4+f2-2,f2)+1
g7=mod(i4,f2)+1
do i5=1,f3
g4=mod(i5+f3-2,f3)+1
g5=mod(i5,f3)+1
do i1=1,5
g3(i1,i5,i4,i3)=0.0d0
do i2=1,5
g3(i1,i5,i4,i3)=g3(i1,i5,i4,i3)+
1 g2(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,i4,i3)+
2 f0(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,g5,i4,i3)+
3 f9(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,g7,i3)+
4 f8(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,i4,g9)+
5 f7(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,g4,i4,i3)+
6 f6(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,g6,i3)+
7 f5(i1,i2,i5,i4,i3)*g1(i2,i5,i4,g8)
enddo
enddo
enddo
enddo
enddo
return
end
---
the innermost 2 loops have constant loop bound, and this example can paralle in
the 2nd loop instead of 3rd loop.
so,any plan to improve CASE_CONVERT or type casting in instantiate_scev ?
Thanks!
---Jun
>From gcc-bugs-return-504299-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 03:48:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504299-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33126 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 03:48:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33088 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 03:48:25 -0000
From: "bacon at cs dot nyu.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68589] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 03:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bacon at cs dot nyu.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68589-4-HDoPm01J1w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03226.txt.bz2
Content-length: 503
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68589
--- Comment #2 from David Bacon <bacon at cs dot nyu.edu> ---
A workaround for this gcc bug is to replace the offending 1e37 (the only one in
the .i file) with 10000000000000000000000000000000000000.1 (1{37 zeroes}.1).
That works in the 5.2.0 case, anyway.
It is worth noting also that the segfault occurred with every pure positive
power of 10 that I tried (quite a few): the .1 matters, if not to the
floating-point value realized.
dB
>From gcc-bugs-return-504300-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 03:49:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504300-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33920 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 03:48:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33862 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 03:48:55 -0000
From: "bacon at cs dot nyu.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68589] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 03:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bacon at cs dot nyu.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68589-4-oJv2JTJyP7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03227.txt.bz2
Content-length: 503
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68589
--- Comment #3 from David Bacon <bacon at cs dot nyu.edu> ---
A workaround for this gcc bug is to replace the offending 1e37 (the only one in
the .i file) with 10000000000000000000000000000000000000.1 (1{37 zeroes}.1).
That works in the 5.2.0 case, anyway.
It is worth noting also that the segfault occurred with every pure positive
power of 10 that I tried (quite a few): the .1 matters, if not to the
floating-point value realized.
dB
>From gcc-bugs-return-504301-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 07:38:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504301-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40223 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 07:38:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40193 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 07:37:59 -0000
From: "c.spanakis83 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68593] New: Problem compiling random.h
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 07:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: c.spanakis83 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03228.txt.bz2
Content-length: 794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
Bug ID: 68593
Summary: Problem compiling random.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: c.spanakis83 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello I tried to compile a c++ file using random.h and i got this message:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.2/include/c++/random:42:0,
from main.cpp:9:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.9.2/include/c++/limits:1561:7: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
max() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT { return __FLT_MAX__; }
what could be the problem?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504302-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 08:33:29 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504302-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58962 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 08:33:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58930 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 08:33:25 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68593] Problem compiling random.h
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 08:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68593-4-A8S5ufpHn3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03229.txt.bz2
Content-length: 407
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Windows?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504303-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 10:19:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504303-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45847 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 10:19:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45786 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 10:19:47 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-54070-4-hCBRq7HmJ4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54070-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54070-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03230.txt.bz2
Content-length: 503
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have a somewhat ragged patch that does the job. I will be cleaning it up in
the next 24 hours for submission.
Paul
>From gcc-bugs-return-504304-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 10:20:49 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504304-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46795 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 10:20:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46775 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 10:20:45 -0000
From: "luca.dallolio at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/68594] New: [regression] libfortran WRITE() ERR option causing segfault when used twice
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: luca.dallolio at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03231.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3412
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68594
Bug ID: 68594
Summary: [regression] libfortran WRITE() ERR option causing
segfault when used twice
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: luca.dallolio at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36861&action=edit
double WRITE with ERR option causing segfault in Trusty
A simple fortran program causes a segmentation fault under Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty
but works fine in Ubuntu 12.04 Precise.
The problem can be reproduced by using the ERR option of the WRITE command
twice :
PROGRAM WRITESEGF2
WRITE (*,'(I8)',ERR=40) 3.14
40 CONTINUE
WRITE (*,'(I8)',ERR=80) 3.14
80 CONTINUE
END
Here the compilation options :
gfortran -O0 -g -fcheck=all -o writesegfault2 writesegfault2.f
This is the output in Trusty :
(trusty64)$ ./writesegfault2
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x7F1B871EA777
#1 0x7F1B871EAD7E
#2 0x7F1B86E42D3F
#3 0x7F1B86EA41B4
#4 0x7F1B872A1D1E
#5 0x7F1B872AC43C
#6 0x7F1B872AE558
#7 0x40088E in writesegf2 at writesegfault2.f:4
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
GDB says :
(trusty64)$ gdb ./writesegfault2
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__memcpy_sse2_unaligned () at
../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memcpy-sse2-unaligned.S:153
153 ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memcpy-sse2-unaligned.S: No such file or
directory.
In Precise there is simply no output, as expected :
(precise64)$ ./writesegfault2
(precise64)$
A single WRITE with ERR label seems to work fine, even in Trusty :
PROGRAM WRITEOK
WRITE (*,'(I8)',ERR=40) 3.14
40 CONTINUE
WRITE (*,'(I8)') 3
WRITE (*,'(E8.3)') 3.14
END
(trusty64)$ ./writeok
3
.314E+01
Here is another variant causing the problem :
PROGRAM WRITESEGF
WRITE (*,'(I8)',ERR=40) 3.14
40 CONTINUE
WRITE (*,'(I8)') 3.14
END
Another segmentation fault seems to be caused by a WRITE with ERR label,
folowed by a simple conversion (should be an error instead) :
(trusty64)$ ./writesegfault
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x7FF7F2BCB777
#1 0x7FF7F2BCBD7E
#2 0x7FF7F2823D3F
#3 0x7FF7F28851B4
#4 0x7FF7F2C82D1E
#5 0x7FF7F2C8D43C
#6 0x7FF7F2C8F558
#7 0x40088E in MAIN__ at writesegfault.f:4
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Without using labels, it should be an error:
PROGRAM WRITEERR
WRITE (*,'(I8)') 3.14
END
When running this, in both Trusty and Precise :
(trusty64)$ ./writeerror
At line 2 of file writeerror.f (unit = 6, file = 'stdout')
Fortran runtime error: Expected INTEGER for item 1 in formatted transfer, got
REAL
(I8)
^
All this was reproduced using different versions of gfortran : 4.6.3 in Precise
and 4.8.4 in Trusty.
Nothing changes by switching gfortran (backporting 4.8 in Precise and
installing 4.6 in Trusty), changing architecture (32 and 64 bit), moving
binaries.
The issue stays the same, so it should be a libgfortran or glibc issue...
>From gcc-bugs-return-504305-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 11:22:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504305-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72986 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 11:22:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72947 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 11:22:39 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/68594] libfortran WRITE() ERR option causing segfault when used twice
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68594-4-YX4iP3PU5X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03232.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1847
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68594
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[regression] libfortran |libfortran WRITE() ERR
|WRITE() ERR option causing |option causing segfault
|segfault when used twice |when used twice
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
All the tests give the expected output at run time with 5.2.0, 5.2.1 (r231024),
and trunk (6.0). With trunk (6.0) the run time errors are followed by a
backtrace:
At line 4 of file pr68594_2.f90 (unit = 6, file = 'stdout')
Fortran runtime error: Expected INTEGER for item 1 in formatted transfer, got
REAL
(I8)
^
Error termination. Backtrace:
...
which disappears if the tests are compiled with -fno-backtrace.
With 4.9.3, the first test gives at run time
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
...
while the three others give the expected outputs.
With 4.8.5, the third test gives at run time
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
...
while the three others give the expected outputs.
AFAICT this has been fixed between revisions r212778 (2014-07-18, segfault) and
r21296O (2014-07-23, no segfault), likely r212875 (pr61632). I am not sure this
worth the back port and IMO this PR can be closed as FIXED.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504306-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 11:32:03 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504306-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77991 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 11:32:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77965 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 11:31:59 -0000
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68595] New: ice in const_vector_mask_from_tree at expr.c:11455
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03233.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1129
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68595
Bug ID: 68595
Summary: ice in const_vector_mask_from_tree at expr.c:11455
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36862&action=edit
C source code
$ ../results/bin/gcc -c -O3 -w bug251.c
qwe_0.c: In function ‘func_8’:
qwe_0.c:143:10: internal compiler error: in const_vector_mask_from_tree, at
expr.c:11455
0x8556c2 const_vector_mask_from_tree
../../src/trunk/gcc/expr.c:11455
0x8556c2 const_vector_from_tree
../../src/trunk/gcc/expr.c:11477
0x8556c2 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
../../src/trunk/gcc/expr.c:9745
0x863bc3 expand_expr_real(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier,
rtx_def**, bool)
gcc trunk dated 20151127
>From gcc-bugs-return-504307-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 11:50:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504307-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96189 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 11:50:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 96165 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 11:50:18 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68595] [6 regression] ice in const_vector_mask_from_tree at expr.c:11455
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc component short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68595-4-w11wvlPnUG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03234.txt.bz2
Content-length: 985
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68595
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c |middle-end
Summary|ice in |[6 regression] ice in
|const_vector_mask_from_tree |const_vector_mask_from_tree
|at expr.c:11455 |at expr.c:11455
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
int a, b;
char c;
void fn1() {
b = 30;
for (; b <= 32; b++) {
c = -17;
for (; c <= 56; c++)
a -= 0 == (c || b);
}
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-504308-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 11:51:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504308-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97129 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 11:51:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 97089 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 11:51:21 -0000
From: "sverd.johnsen at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug driver/68596] New: -march=native on Skylake turns into -march=broadwell -mtune=generic; -march=skylake not working
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: driver
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sverd.johnsen at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03235.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2782
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
Bug ID: 68596
Summary: -march=native on Skylake turns into -march=broadwell
-mtune=generic; -march=skylake not working
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sverd.johnsen at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
snapshot gcc-5-20151124.tar.bz2
% /usr/bin/gcc -v -march=native -E - 2>&1 </dev/null | grep cc1
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.0/cc1 -E -quiet -v -
-march=broadwell -mmmx -mno-3dnow -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -mno-sse4a -mcx16
-msahf -mmovbe -maes -mno-sha -mpclmul -mpopcnt -mabm -mno-lwp -mfma -mno-fma4
-mno-xop -mbmi -mbmi2 -mno-tbm -mavx -mavx2 -msse4.2 -msse4.1 -mlzcnt -mrtm
-mhle -mrdrnd -mf16c -mfsgsbase -mrdseed -mprfchw -madx -mfxsr -mxsave
-mxsaveopt -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512pf
-mno-prefetchwt1 -mclflushopt -mxsavec -mxsaves -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw
-mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -mno-clwb -mno-pcommit
-mno-mwaitx --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param
l2-cache-size=6144 -mtune=generic
% lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 4
Socket(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 94
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Stepping: 3
CPU MHz: 1345.449
CPU max MHz: 3900.0000
CPU min MHz: 800.0000
BogoMIPS: 7007.99
Virtualization: VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 256K
L3 cache: 6144K
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx
pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2
ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt
tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch ida arat
pln pts dtherm hwp hwp_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi
flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
rtm mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1
also -march=skylake does not work
error: bad value (skylake) for -march= switch
>From gcc-bugs-return-504309-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 11:56:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504309-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100979 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 11:56:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100943 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 11:56:26 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug driver/68596] -march=native on Skylake turns into -march=broadwell -mtune=generic; -march=skylake not working
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 11:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: driver
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68596-4-HoXj6Pe8dT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03236.txt.bz2
Content-length: 637
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, -march=skylake and -march=skylake-avx512 will only be available
in gcc-6. A backport to gcc-5 is not planed AFAIK.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504310-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 12:34:13 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504310-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127692 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 12:34:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127660 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 12:34:09 -0000
From: "adam at aphirst dot karoo.co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/58750] Wrong code with realloc on assignment and array constructors with numeric type conversion
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 12:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: adam at aphirst dot karoo.co.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58750-4-eO8puhNMMs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58750-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58750-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03237.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1294
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58750
--- Comment #10 from Adam Hirst <adam at aphirst dot karoo.co.uk> ---
It's been another year, and I would like to confirm that this behaviour is
indeed still present for me in 5.2.0, and adding _i8 as Tobias pointed out
still does cause correct code to result.
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /build/gcc-multilib/src/gcc-5.2.0/configure --prefix=/usr
--libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=https://bugs.archlinux.org/
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-libmpx --with-system-zlib --with-isl
--enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-clocale=gnu
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libssp --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-lto --enable-plugin
--enable-install-libiberty --with-linker-hash-style=gnu
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-multilib --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC)
>From gcc-bugs-return-504311-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 14:01:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504311-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125592 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 14:01:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125513 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 14:01:18 -0000
From: "luca.dallolio at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/68594] libfortran WRITE() ERR option causing segfault when used twice
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: luca.dallolio at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-68594-4-ylmHBYSGSS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03238.txt.bz2
Content-length: 650
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68594
Luca Dall'Olio <luca.dallolio at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Luca Dall'Olio <luca.dallolio at gmail dot com> ---
Thank you very much for this information, I will try to upgrade to Wily.
I agree this situation should be rare, we found it by compiling and testing a
NASA code recently open sourced : https://github.com/nasa/NASTRAN
>From gcc-bugs-return-504312-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 14:19:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504312-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50022 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 14:19:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49998 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 14:19:23 -0000
From: "ryan.burn at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68597] New: ice inin check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ryan.burn at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68597-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03239.txt.bz2
Content-length: 7166
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68597
Bug ID: 68597
Summary: ice inin check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ryan.burn at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Below code causes this stack trace when compiled with -std=c++1z when compiled
with
rnburn@localhost ~/bugs/lambda_check_return $ g++17 --version
g++ (GCC) 6.0.0 20151123 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
main.cpp: In lambda function:
main.cpp:19:35: internal compiler error: in check_return_expr, at
cp/typeck.c:8635
return 1 / beta * (alpha - 1);
^
0x75f9dd check_return_expr(tree_node*, bool*)
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/typeck.c:8635
0x79bfae finish_return_stmt(tree_node*)
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/semantics.c:867
0x73a6dd cp_parser_jump_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:11414
0x73a6dd cp_parser_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:10035
0x74239f cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:11527
0x73aab1 cp_parser_selection_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:10555
0x73aab1 cp_parser_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:10010
0x74239f cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:11527
0x73aab1 cp_parser_selection_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:10555
0x73aab1 cp_parser_statement
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:10010
0x73ae41 cp_parser_statement_seq_opt
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:10426
0x741662 cp_parser_lambda_body
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:9894
0x741662 cp_parser_lambda_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:9378
0x70f887 cp_parser_primary_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:4753
0x71b523 cp_parser_postfix_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:6444
0x7199f9 cp_parser_unary_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:7688
0x724059 cp_parser_binary_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:8441
0x7248bf cp_parser_assignment_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:8712
0x724d35 cp_parser_constant_expression
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:8964
0x73c4e7 cp_parser_init_declarator
../../src-fix/gcc/cp/parser.c:18147
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
#include <cmath>
auto make_test_objective3(double beta, double l, int& evaluation_counter) {
auto phi0 = [=](double alpha) {
if (alpha <= 1-beta)
return 1-alpha;
else if (alpha >= 1+beta)
return alpha-1;
else
return 1 / (2*beta)*std::pow(alpha-1,2)+beta/2;
};
auto phi0_prime = [=](double alpha) {
if (alpha <= 1-beta)
return -1;
else if (alpha >= 1+beta)
return 1;
else
return 1 / beta * (alpha - 1);
};
}
int main() {
return 0;
}
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>From gcc-bugs-return-504313-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 14:20:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504313-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 52039 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 14:20:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51851 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 14:20:23 -0000
From: "ryan.burn at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68597] ice inin check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8635
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ryan.burn at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68597-4-AVxFycIxRq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68597-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68597-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03240.txt.bz2
Content-length: 217
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68597
--- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
This looks similar to 67846, but the fix from that bug was already put in and I
verified its test case works.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504314-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 14:57:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504314-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39059 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 14:57:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 39016 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 14:56:58 -0000
From: "mirco.valentini at polimi dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68598] New: Ponter Function as LValue
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mirco.valentini at polimi dot it
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03241.txt.bz2
Content-length: 415
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68598
Bug ID: 68598
Summary: Ponter Function as LValue
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mirco.valentini at polimi dot it
Target Milestone: ---
>From gcc-bugs-return-504315-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 15:11:27 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504315-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68870 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 15:11:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 68844 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 15:11:23 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68598] Ponter Function as LValue
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68598-4-zlr8fvstZG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03242.txt.bz2
Content-length: 577
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68598
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Test, revision, ... ?
From the summary, I guess that it has been fixed on trunk (6.0).
>From gcc-bugs-return-504316-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 15:55:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504316-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50780 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 15:55:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49303 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 15:55:08 -0000
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68599] New: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr45122.c and tree-vrp.c
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03243.txt.bz2
Content-length: 547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
Bug ID: 68599
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr45122.c and
tree-vrp.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr45122.c began failing on powerpc with r229902 change to
tree-vrp.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-504317-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 15:56:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504317-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69315 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 15:56:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69270 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 15:56:19 -0000
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68599] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr45122.c and tree-vrp.c
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68599-4-o6fMZMaKwG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03244.txt.bz2
Content-length: 591
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504318-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 16:14:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504318-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21011 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 16:14:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20959 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 16:14:39 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-6TrXAcOj8x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03245.txt.bz2
Content-length: 372
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36863
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36863&action=edit
patch
and here is the equivalent for the powerpc and mipsel targets. side note: the
mips (be) targets look a bit inconsistent to the mipsel targets.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504319-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 16:18:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504319-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40634 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 16:18:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40564 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 16:18:37 -0000
From: "bacon at cs dot nyu.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/68589] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bacon at cs dot nyu.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68589-4-nIWsjPtDot@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03246.txt.bz2
Content-length: 278
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68589
--- Comment #4 from David Bacon <bacon at cs dot nyu.edu> ---
This bug was first observed in gcc 4.9.3, but since it is also present in
5.2.0, I have changed the Version field in this bug report from 4.9.3 to 5.2.0.
dB
>From gcc-bugs-return-504320-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 17:10:18 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504320-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99187 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 17:10:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 99101 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 17:10:08 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 17:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-th3uzxittX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03247.txt.bz2
Content-length: 182
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, but can't we merge the mipsel and mipsel64 cases here?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504321-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 18:00:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504321-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107732 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 18:00:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107690 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 18:00:46 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68600] New: Inlined MATMUL is too slow.
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68600-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03248.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2834
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
Bug ID: 68600
Summary: Inlined MATMUL is too slow.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
Target Milestone: ---
Expected results:
(1) to be at least as fast as the MATMUL from the library when compiled
with the same options (-O2 -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops);
(2) to be at least as fast as dgemm from lapack when compiled
with the same options.
Options tested
(a) -O2 -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -fno-frontend-optimize, i.e., MATMUL
from the library;
(b) -O2 -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops, i.e., inlined MATMUL;
(c) -Ofast -march=native -funroll-loops;
(d) -O2 -ftree-vectorize.
Timings in Gflops/s on a Corei7 2.8Ghz (turbo 3.8Ghz) show that neither (1) nor
(2) are true (comparing columns 4 and 6 gives an idea of timings accuracy).
(a) (b)
Size Loops Matmul dgemm Matmul dgemm
===================================================
2 200000 0.360 0.218 0.723 0.221
4 200000 1.246 0.959 1.379 0.969
8 200000 2.098 2.396 2.186 2.385
16 200000 3.748 3.648 2.920 3.645
32 200000 5.386 5.406 3.096 5.418
64 30757 6.364 6.385 3.220 6.494
128 3829 6.362 6.760 3.256 6.702
256 477 6.515 6.527 3.164 6.444
512 59 6.313 6.634 3.189 6.675
1024 7 4.796 4.842 2.935 4.853
2048 1 4.026 4.032 2.824 3.996
4096 1 3.355 3.467 2.652 3.475
(c) (d)
Size Loops Matmul dgemm Matmul dgemm
========================================================
2 200000 0.403 0.172 0.919 0.204
4 200000 0.956 0.799 1.668 1.104
8 200000 1.796 2.089 2.060 2.310
16 200000 2.948 4.297 2.253 3.475
32 200000 4.119 6.219 2.049 4.229
64 30757 5.174 7.652 2.268 4.464
128 3829 5.042 6.985 2.371 4.353
256 477 5.052 6.492 2.423 4.696
512 59 5.136 6.738 2.421 4.704
1024 7 3.978 5.075 2.361 4.012
2048 1 3.476 4.304 2.372 3.543
4096 1 2.966 3.307 2.370 3.333
>From gcc-bugs-return-504322-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 18:02:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504322-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112910 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 18:02:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112880 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 18:02:16 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/68600] Inlined MATMUL is too slow.
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68600-4-gsjeaC7QYq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68600-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68600-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03249.txt.bz2
Content-length: 253
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Created attachment 36864
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36864&action=edit
Code used for the timings
>From gcc-bugs-return-504323-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 18:15:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504323-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21921 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 18:15:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21562 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 18:15:52 -0000
From: "c.spanakis83 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68593] Problem compiling random.h
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: c.spanakis83 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68593-4-Pc9DRbL4fh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03250.txt.bz2
Content-length: 119
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
--- Comment #2 from c.spanakis83 at gmail dot com ---
Windows 10
>From gcc-bugs-return-504324-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 18:18:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504324-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25165 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 18:18:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25096 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 18:18:46 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51119-4-d8zL1eXNk1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03251.txt.bz2
Content-length: 455
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
From comment 27
> > I agree that inline should be faster, if the compiler is reasonably smart,
> > if the matrix dimensions are known at compile time (i.e. should be able to
> > generate the same kernel). I haven't checked yet.
>
> If the compiler turns out not to be reasonably smart, file a bug report :-)
PR68600.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504325-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 18:54:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504325-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121162 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 18:54:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121113 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 18:54:27 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68593] Problem compiling random.h
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 18:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-68593-4-gtgKAESbP3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03252.txt.bz2
Content-length: 567
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
>From gcc-bugs-return-504326-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:08:00 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504326-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124872 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 20:07:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124830 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 20:07:56 -0000
From: "doko at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-0FdmOJUg74@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03253.txt.bz2
Content-length: 565
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #36863|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 36865
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36865&action=edit
mips/powerpc patch
updated patch, cross builds in progress
>From gcc-bugs-return-504327-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:11:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504327-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127636 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 20:11:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127603 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 20:11:01 -0000
From: "kfischer at college dot harvard.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] New: GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kfischer at college dot harvard.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03254.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2935
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
Bug ID: 68601
Summary: GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kfischer at college dot harvard.edu
Target Milestone: ---
I am compiling LLVM on Windows using Mingw-w64's pre-built GCC 5.2.0 for MSYS2
and believe the generated code is invalid. The effect of this miscompilation is
an LLVM assertion firing even though it's conditions is not satisfied. This
does not occur with -O0 and I have verified in the debugger that the memory
looks as expected.
The C++ code in questions (from LLVM's Instructions.cpp is):
```
assert(getOperand(0)->getType() ==
cast<PointerType>(getOperand(1)->getType())->getElementType()
&& "Ptr must be a pointer to Val type!");
```
Here is the relevant disassembly as seen from GDB:
```
│0x1a6b990 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+80> mov -0x18(%rbx),%rcx
│
│0x1a6b994 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+84> callq 0x1bbf360
<llvm::cast_or_null<llvm::Value, llvm::Value>(llvm::Value*)> │
│0x1a6b999 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+89> mov 0x8(%rax),%rdx
│
│0x1a6b99d <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+93> mov -0x30(%rbx),%rcx
│
│0x1a6b9a1 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+97> callq 0x1bbf360
<llvm::cast_or_null<llvm::Value, llvm::Value>(llvm::Value*)> │
│0x1a6b9a6 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+102> mov %rdx,%rcx
│
│0x1a6b9a9 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+105> mov 0x8(%rax),%rsi
│
>│0x1a6b9ad <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+109> callq 0x1c60420
<llvm::cast<llvm::PointerType, llvm::Type>(llvm::Type*)> │
│0x1a6b9b2 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+114> mov 0x10(%rax),%rax
│
│0x1a6b9b6 <llvm::StoreInst::AssertOK()+118> cmp (%rax),%rsi
```
It seems live the mov at +102 is moving a junk value (since the previous call
clobbers rdx). Moreover, before the call %rdx had value
`getOperand(1)->getType()`, which would be the correct thing to put into rcx
here. I thus think the compiler got confused and didn't notice that the
register is being clobbered by the call.
The full pre-processed source is attached.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504328-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:15:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504328-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130756 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 20:15:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130712 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 20:15:33 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4-zxKIsfnQvi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03255.txt.bz2
Content-length: 283
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What options are you using? Can you try -fno-strict-aliasing? Some folks are
known to pay fast and lose with strict aliasing rules including LLVM
developers.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504329-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:17:48 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504329-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6039 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 20:17:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5939 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 20:17:44 -0000
From: "kfischer at college dot harvard.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kfischer at college dot harvard.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4-45f7uXssRm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03256.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1511
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
--- Comment #2 from Keno Fischer <kfischer at college dot harvard.edu> ---
The default options used by LLVM's build system:
```
g++ -m64
-I/home/Administrator/julia/deps/build/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts/include
-I/home/Administrator/julia/deps/build/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts/lib/IR
-I/home/Administrator/julia/deps/srccache/llvm-svn/include
-I/home/Administrator/julia/deps/srccache/llvm-svn/lib/IR -D_DEBUG
-D__NO_CTYPE_INLINE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -g
-std=gnu++11 -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wcast-qual
-D__USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS__ -D__CRT__NO_INLINE -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wall
-W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wno-maybe-uninitialized
-Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-comment -c -MMD -MP -MF
"/home/Administrator/julia/deps/build/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts+GCC/lib/IR/Release+Debug+Asserts/Instructions.d.tmp"
-MT
"/home/Administrator/julia/deps/build/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts+GCC/lib/IR/Release+Debug+Asserts/Instructions.o"
-MT
"/home/Administrator/julia/deps/build/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts+GCC/lib/IR/Release+Debug+Asserts/Instructions.d"
/home/Administrator/julia/deps/srccache/llvm-svn/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp -o
/home/Administrator/julia/deps/build/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts+GCC/lib/IR/Release+Debug+Asserts/Instructions.o
```
I will try `-fno-strict-aliasing`
>From gcc-bugs-return-504330-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:23:01 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504330-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12152 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 20:23:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12121 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 20:22:57 -0000
From: "kfischer at college dot harvard.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kfischer at college dot harvard.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4-72S0JsALZg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03257.txt.bz2
Content-length: 200
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
--- Comment #3 from Keno Fischer <kfischer at college dot harvard.edu> ---
`-fno-strict-aliasing` does not seem to change the generated assembly.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504331-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 20:54:12 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504331-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35440 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 20:54:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35384 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 20:54:08 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 20:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4-P8lZ5gwOP9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03258.txt.bz2
Content-length: 535
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please attach the pre-processed source file again.
(you may use compression if it is too large.)
What version of LLVM are you building?
>From gcc-bugs-return-504332-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 21:33:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504332-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20028 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 21:33:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19434 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 21:33:31 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/68564] Ada fails to bootstrap on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68564-4-kXU5WrGrGj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03259.txt.bz2
Content-length: 231
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68564
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> updated patch, cross builds in progress
Thanks, the patch is OK for all branches if the builds succeed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504333-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 21:42:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504333-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35917 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 21:42:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 35883 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 21:42:35 -0000
From: "kfischer at college dot harvard.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kfischer at college dot harvard.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4-6cHjkcE89x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03260.txt.bz2
Content-length: 309
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
--- Comment #5 from Keno Fischer <kfischer at college dot harvard.edu> ---
Created attachment 36866
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36866&action=edit
Preprocessed source
Trying to attach again. This is part of latest LLVM trunk.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504334-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 22:02:10 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504334-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123467 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 22:02:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123427 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 22:02:06 -0000
From: "gerald at pfeifer dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libffi/65726] [5/6 Regression] libffi fails to build when not bootstrapping: configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 22:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libffi
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gerald at pfeifer dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65726-4-kCRv9PAAW3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65726-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65726-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03261.txt.bz2
Content-length: 165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
--- Comment #8 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
This one fixes the problem in all my tests.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504335-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 22:07:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504335-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10845 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 22:07:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10812 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 22:07:22 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68601] GCC miscompiles LLVM on Windows
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 22:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-68601-4-J5ih5xqQzc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03262.txt.bz2
Content-length: 335
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68601
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I cannot reproduce the issue on Linux with latest gcc-5 branch.
Next week the gcc-5.3 release candidate should be available.
Many bugs were fixed since 5.2., so please check if this issue got fixed, too.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504336-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 22:22:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504336-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38722 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 22:22:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 38576 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 22:22:37 -0000
From: "andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68602] New: i386: -mtune/arch options not all output by -v --help
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 22:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03263.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2477
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68602
Bug ID: 68602
Summary: i386: -mtune/arch options not all output by -v --help
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
Target Milestone: ---
gcc -v --help does not output all the possible options for -mtune=/-march=
For example corei7-avx is missing for arch, which is Sandy Bridge. tune is also
mising all cpu names
-march=CPU[,+EXTENSION...]
generate code for CPU and EXTENSION, CPU is one of:
generic32, generic64, i386, i486, i586, i686,
pentium, pentiumpro, pentiumii, pentiumiii,
pentium4,
prescott, nocona, core, core2, corei7, l1om, k1om,
k6, k6_2, athlon, opteron, k8, amdfam10, bdver1,
bdver2, bdver3, bdver4, btver1, btver2
EXTENSION is combination of:
8087, 287, 387, no87, mmx, nommx, sse, sse2, sse3,
ssse3, sse4.1, sse4.2, sse4, nosse, avx, avx2,
avx512f, avx512cd, avx512er, avx512pf, avx512dq,
avx512bw, avx512vl, noavx, vmx, vmfunc, smx, xsave,
xsaveopt, xsavec, xsaves, aes, pclmul, fsgsbase,
rdrnd, f16c, bmi2, fma, fma4, xop, lwp, movbe, cx16,
ept, lzcnt, hle, rtm, invpcid, clflush, nop,
syscall,
rdtscp, 3dnow, 3dnowa, padlock, svme, sse4a, abm,
bmi, tbm, adx, rdseed, prfchw, smap, mpx, sha,
clflushopt, prefetchwt1, se1, clwb, pcommit,
avx512ifma, avx512vbmi
-mtune=CPU optimize for CPU, CPU is one of:
generic32, generic64, i8086, i186, i286, i386, i486,
i586, i686, pentium, pentiumpro, pentiumii,
pentiumiii, pentium4, prescott, nocona, core, core2,
corei7, l1om, k1om, k6, k6_2, athlon, opteron, k8,
amdfam10, bdver1, bdver2, bdver3, bdver4, btver1,
btver2
>From gcc-bugs-return-504337-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 23:15:04 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504337-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82765 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 23:15:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 82665 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 23:14:58 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/68603] New: FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 23:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68603-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03264.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Bug ID: 68603
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-11/msg00831.html :
...
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 gcov: 3 failures in line counts, 0 in
branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 line 115: is 27:should be 14
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 line 58: is 18:should be 9
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 line 73: is 162:should be 81
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 gcov: 3 failures in line counts, 0 in
branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 line 115: is 27:should be 14
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 line 58: is 18:should be 9
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 line 73: is 162:should be 81
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 gcov: 3 failures in line counts, 0 in
branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 line 115: is 27:should be 14
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 line 58: is 18:should be 9
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 line 73: is 162:should be 81
...
>From gcc-bugs-return-504338-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 28 23:27:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504338-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3550 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2015 23:27:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 131018 invoked by uid 48); 28 Nov 2015 23:27:13 -0000
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68526] [6 Regression] gcc.target/powerpc/recip-4.c fails starting with r230492
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 23:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68526-4-IeqTbKAR8w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68526-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03265.txt.bz2
Content-length: 476
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-28
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504339-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Nov 29 01:57:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504339-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126485 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2015 01:57:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125447 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2015 01:57:17 -0000
From: "andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/66229] LTO fails with -fauto-profile on mcf
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 01:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66229-4-gGUguyjMft@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66229-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66229-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03266.txt.bz2
Content-length: 512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66229
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen <andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org> ---
Some analysis of the problem:
At the time cc1 is streaming out profile_data it is not set to anything in
autofdo. So the LTO files contain all 0 profile data, which later causes the
ICE here.
Seems to be some kind of ordering problem.
Strangely the autofdo pass gets executed in the frontend run, but for unknown
reasons the profile data doesn't survive until the LTO data is written.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504340-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Nov 29 03:56:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504340-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115424 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2015 03:56:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115376 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2015 03:56:25 -0000
From: "yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68604] New: typeid does not allow an id-expression that denotes a non-static data member
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 03:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-68604-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03267.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68604
Bug ID: 68604
Summary: typeid does not allow an id-expression that denotes a
non-static data member
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Given the following simplified example from this Stackoverflow question
http://stackoverflow.com/q/28053640/1708801 :
#include <iostream>
#include <typeinfo>
struct A{ int i; };
int main()
{
std::cout << typeid(A::i).name() << '\n';
}
gcc produces the following error:
error: invalid use of non-static data member 'A::i'
std::cout << typeid(A::i).name() << '\n';
^
As far as I can tell since this is an unevaluated operand like in sizeof and
decltype this should should be ok. clang accepts this code.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504341-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Nov 29 04:03:58 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504341-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123196 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2015 04:03:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123094 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2015 04:03:52 -0000
From: "Casey at Carter dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/68434] [concepts] ICE: same canonical type node for different types
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 04:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Casey at Carter dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-68434-4-Xzu2PyXs8A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03268.txt.bz2
Content-length: 975
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
Casey Carter <Casey at Carter dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #4 from Casey Carter <Casey at Carter dot net> ---
> I hit the issue today when compiling the cmcstl2 lib.
If you want to see ICEs from deduction constraints, change the "#if 0" to 1 on
line 83 of include/stl2/detail/fwd.hpp so that the STL2_DEDUCTION_CONSTRAINT
macro emits actual deduction constraint syntax instead of "requires
Concept<decltype(expression), ...>". I've had to avoid deduction constraints
completely to get compiling code.
I'm not complaining - C++11/14 bugs *should* take priority over [concepts] -
but I would be willing to buy beer for whomever fixes the deduction constraint
bugs so that I could stop using the preprocessor.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504342-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Nov 29 04:06:17 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504342-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124793 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2015 04:06:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124709 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2015 04:06:02 -0000
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/68538] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027 when cross-compiling for cris-linux-gnu target
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 04:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc assigned_to everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-68538-4-3wMWiaPVWF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03269.txt.bz2
Content-length: 741
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68538
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-29
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for the report. Assigning to myself, hoping to have a look soon.
Also seen on trunk r231039 for cris-elf.
>From gcc-bugs-return-504343-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Nov 29 09:08:39 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-504343-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95352 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2015 09:08:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95331 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2015 09:08:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.laposte.net
Received: from smtpoutz13.laposte.net (HELO smtp.laposte.net) (194.117.213.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 09:08:35 +0000
Received: from smtp.laposte.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrout001 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1293D4E4749D for <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:08:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.laposte.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrout001 (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5504E47582 for <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:08:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lpn-prd-mstr067.laposte (lpn-prd-mstr067.laposte [10.128.59.68]) by lpn-prd-vrout001 (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6D94E4757C for <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:08:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 09:08:00 -0000
From: john.frankish@laposte.net
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <1823609923.633729.1448788111859.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <249173683.625743.1448787912066.JavaMail.zimbra@laposte.net>
Subject: compiling with "-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" gives libtool error
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-VR-SrcIP: [91.74.228.192]
X-VR-FullState: 0
X-VR-Score: 0
X-VR-Cause-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekhedrkeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgv
X-VR-Cause-2: mecunfetrffquffvgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvkfgjufggtgfg
X-VR-Cause-3: ihfothesthejtgdtredtjeenucfhrhhomhepjhhohhhnrdhfrhgrnhhkihhshheslhgrphhoshhtvgdr
X-VR-Cause-4: nhgvthenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdphhgvlhhopehlphhnqdhprhguqdhmshht
X-VR-Cause-5: rhdtieejrdhprhhoshhoughivgdpihhnvghtpedutddruddvkedrheelrdeikedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhm
X-VR-Cause-6: pehjohhhnhdrfhhrrghnkhhishhhsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepghgttgdqsghu
X-VR-Cause-7: ghhssehgtggtrdhgnhhurdhorhhg
X-VR-AvState: No
X-VR-State: 0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg03270.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1064
Compiling some packages with "-flto -fuse-linker-plugin" gives a libtool
error during "make". Compiling the same package without "-flto
-fuse-linker-plugin" allows "make" to complete without errors.
Using gcc-4.9.1/binutils-2.24.51 or gcc-5.2.0/binutils-2.25.1
The problem seems to occur with a few 10's of packages (eg cogl-1.20.0), but
not with others (eg gnome-music-3.16.2).
Using cogl-1.20.0 as an example:
CC="gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -mtune=generic -Os -pipe" CXX="g++ -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin -mtune=generic -Os -pipe -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti"
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-static --localstatedir=/var
--enable-gles1 --enable-gles2 --enable-cogl-gst=yes
find . -name Makefile -type f -exec sed -i 's/-g -O2//g' {} \;
make
...
CC cogl-enum-types.lo
CCLD libcogl.la
../libtool: eval: line 1: syntax error: unexpected "|"
Makefile:1507: recipe for target 'libcogl.la' failed
make[4]: *** [libcogl.la] Error 2
This can be fixed by using NM="gcc-nm", but as binutils was compiled with lto enabled, it shouldn't be required?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
[not found] <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-11-23 7:36 ` [Bug c++/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr vvsed at hotmail dot com
@ 2021-12-26 5:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-26 5:41 ` [Bug target/68484] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-26 5:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-26 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |12.0, 7.1.0, 7.2.0, 8.1.0
Component|target |tree-optimization
Known to fail| |4.7.4, 5.1.0, 6.1.0, 6.4.0
Severity|critical |normal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
[not found] <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-11-23 7:36 ` [Bug c++/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr vvsed at hotmail dot com
2021-12-26 5:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/68484] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-26 5:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-26 5:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-26 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|tree-optimization |target
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=70118
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 7 by r7-5301 (aka PR 70118).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr
[not found] <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-26 5:41 ` [Bug target/68484] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-26 5:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-26 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68484
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> Fixed for GCC 7 by r7-5301 (aka PR 70118).
- *(long long *)__P = ((__v2di)__B)[0];
+ *(__m64_u *)__P = (__m64) ((__v2di)__B)[0];
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-26 5:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-68484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-11-23 7:36 ` [Bug c++/68484] _mm_storel_epi64((__m128i *)x, m); does nothing if "x" is a "volatile" ptr vvsed at hotmail dot com
2021-12-26 5:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/68484] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-26 5:41 ` [Bug target/68484] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-26 5:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).