From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B436A3858C2F; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 07:02:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B436A3858C2F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664434946;
	bh=ZjMisECQwiuQl8udLzbRPxplRTmg37GuPs0cdhvbD4c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Et/R7vTNCMpejR6pdO2zX9MCGr8Ryzy0Mj0js7iJGaY7+2l6FS3Ps6A1RdrbTSF/N
	 1HRcSbiJgVpMPjCCSBe4oUpn8aqSFLXvmws4FpvPGb+RihNH+u7M+tJUgAGY23HstX
	 5QJHM9gSI1Ovvxqvu8ORy/RIxe2E2Ugpuq5xLb2M=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68606] Reduce or disable the static emergency pool
 for C++ exceptions
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 07:02:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-68606-4-HA8cJ0SxGe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68606

--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> (In reply to R. Diez from comment #13)
> > About implementing a proper solution (my patch is just a workaround): T=
here
> > are probably guys who want to control the size of the emergency buffer,=
 but
> > for really constrained environments, I would like an option to disable =
it
> > completely.
>=20
> Yeah, tunable size would be good to do as part of PR 88264, but having a
> build-time configuration to disable it completely is also valuable. And we
> can do that more easily.
>=20
> Let's try to do that for GCC 13.

Any such solution would also be OK to backport I think.=