From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 579683858D37; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:24:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 579683858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664396668;
	bh=7kbRKoijD/8vuuuK3EPuB6Cc6HYZU/g8rUiDsGri0sI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Al9FUvsxacEkA07UedliyxgJFAGAM9WMXjSisaAc/lblP9dEEQHdwGn3McS1FwuXk
	 te7Or9WCw4i6dcMJKD0MOCLQSo0j03IhzdyCD9+HTSOKMMnXquVuKeuBHcu96kxSzk
	 MHoIdKN3psr3sqfRphdF/d9Syr3wMaMjnfcp1xBE=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68606] Reduce or disable the static emergency pool
 for C++ exceptions
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:24:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-68606-4-KWB4FKFz7H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68606-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68606

--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thibaut M. from comment #10)
> > see the "performance of exception handling" / "size of exception handli=
ng"
> > thread in this month's archive of the gcc mailing list
> I was not able to find the thread about "exception handling" of 2020-05,
> could you point it out or detail the conclusion please?

This thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-May/thread.html#232358=