From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 681313858D39; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:20:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 681313858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1664396457; bh=xmFyCvGLcUtTypMr/TEFD3mJccv+UHt/ilZF1VtxECw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YhCNlXzcOst+kqzh6BNfaBPIgm2IDZNPk2QKp6KorrXUeod98tB+oI/ftEp9VMcHX fCrCWmlpvREQn9HTZknaZ+o2o2yXx11X7eXgeVotHKuONwcxa42YMoOO6PLr0yp0mI Wkjt0uJ8yXq4mEAogL++4PrZaH3WwAAfkUX1cENs= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/68606] Reduce or disable the static emergency pool for C++ exceptions Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:20:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68606 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu= .org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to R. Diez from comment #13) > About implementing a proper solution (my patch is just a workaround): The= re > are probably guys who want to control the size of the emergency buffer, b= ut > for really constrained environments, I would like an option to disable it > completely. Yeah, tunable size would be good to do as part of PR 88264, but having a build-time configuration to disable it completely is also valuable. And we = can do that more easily. Let's try to do that for GCC 13.=