From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8F4603890431; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:09:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8F4603890431
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718906962;
	bh=3s+ofdKo6OcLaLIfJyfEVxxpfexorA/Dfqk/5eoOhV0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wq0w1pGP61/alKnGftZ+CVIpSdZeu0P5uXnJXU11GZ0ayxhOcFb+mkB9O+t9SjQ+3
	 U60OVNycQP30cIE9AUq7+4CNpe/BH94yHinfQwOp+kpfQnIsOvOdslPC+xOykviKKA
	 SWj0MGQ5JaiquRYi5JUFRHPitd9LSzF/beoPUK8I=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/68855] PAREN_EXPR not "ignored" where possible
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:09:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-68855-4-mQ4lGYJc8V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-68855-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-68855-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68855

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder if lower complex should do a better job in the first place:
that is from:
  _9 =3D _8 + __complex__ (6.0e+0, 1.0e+0);
  _11 =3D ((_9));
  (*a_7(D))[_6] =3D _11;

instead of producing:
  _9 =3D COMPLEX_EXPR <_15, _14>;
  _11 =3D ((_9));
  _19 =3D REALPART_EXPR <_11>;
  _20 =3D IMAGPART_EXPR <_11>;

It should produce:
  _19 =3D ((_15));
  _20 =3D ((_24));

Instead. that is expand PAREN_EXPR into its components.=