From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B39EA3858D20; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 20:40:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B39EA3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675888846;
	bh=Jb5R8KHigAEM5I/2vcmx4tH9SZNVp7tRsfqQaQ6UpJA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QEZB+l4xKfImljRnnNu/SjlbbanvVX99uvIsbELt+Ff3aSmNc5UA4y5TXAEqTWt//
	 Jg1QjVvsaOIgyR7y93MC2CsWvao7fd/jkfxS/pj4BMutfvO527aHYtxzu9xnlc4mXW
	 X30Q2cvoYWOrqiK1aKpPlu+VwSYPYU/1AqffjM4Y=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/69636] ICE(s) on using option -fmodule-private
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 20:40:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, error-recovery, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-69636-4-ZSW3tTqJk9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-69636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-69636-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D69636

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |accepts-invalid

--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #8)

Commenting out this line:

>   private :: cx_plus_int        ! <- why does this make a difference?

and adding in the main:

  print *, cx_plus_int(a, 2)

make the code compile, while I believe it shouldn't due to the "private"
statement in m.  (This version is rejected by other compilers.)=