From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 043BA3858414; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:48:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 043BA3858414
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686815326;
	bh=gX4hVj+LI9mKDMCASEHLy7gYajZt72a9xNgrvH0/rpM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Dtl1hpWdtwrdwxxuympWf4biWXfRqSL8/Nqg8RaZUicq0xZsZt1Bpf7aSlU8Dcy/V
	 0D/49HZUY6bFJZZLB9QYlBc6kI2+NM4LSSSu2Bs9kHK/AYDdnEO4NcK4DyRVl0Wfct
	 8zvDWq+W2KyvFB05vzsvGRjB+eW1A5u7tsRkOebc=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with
 --enable-default-pie
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:48:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-70150-4-Xa8zAbsof1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-70150-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-70150-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D70150

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #31 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marc Poulhi=C3=A8s from comment #30)
> Hello  Xi Ruoyao,
>=20
> Your 3 patches are also fixing the regressions in the gcc-12 branch. Do y=
ou
> plan on back-porting them on this release branch?

Richard: is it allowed to backport them (or the entire
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/613093.html series) for
gcc-12?=