From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 86A00395C40F; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:25:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 86A00395C40F
From: "demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/70867] [9/10/11/12 regression] access discriminant in
 return aggregate wrongly detected as dangling
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:25:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-70867-4-g3ArvenJWZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-70867-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-70867-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:25:55 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D70867

--- Comment #13 from yuta tomino <demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp>=
 ---
Sorry, perhaps my example is illegal in Ada 2012.
"aliased" is required to return a reference of a part of the parameter.

Randy explained the change in
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.ada/c/7dw7Oqi8lIk/m/5NUBhFN8DQAJ .
(I wonder if it was legal before Ada 2005?? Because aliased parameter is ad=
ded
in Ada 2012 and the relevant text has been changed by AI05-0234-1.)

I think Nicolas's example is always legal.

Thanks.=