public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/71699] bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning: gcc misses that non-NULL pointer + offset can never be NULL
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:11:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-71699-4-avQm8YROaK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-71699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71699

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.0
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
      Known to work|                            |9.3.0
      Known to fail|                            |7.3.0, 8.3.0

--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
At -O1 and above the warning has disappeared with r263662 (GCC 9.0.0 20180820).

It's still on trunk with -O0 (and with -Og) not with higher optimization
levels.  But I'm not sure I see this as a problem.  The test case assigns an
uninitialized variable for no apparent reason and expects the assignment to be
eliminated.  That does happen but only with optimization.  The warning could
probably be enhanced to figure this out by essentially implementing the same
logic as the optimization does but that seems like going too far.  With so many
open bugs against -Wuninitialized of higher priority with no progress for a
decade or more I'm going to resolve this one as fixed.

           reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <bug-71699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-71699-4-avQm8YROaK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).