From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-374859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31779 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2011 18:57:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 31770 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2011 18:57:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:57:46 +0000
From: "3dw4rd at verizon dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/772] Statement expressions issues
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-772-4-8GUo13o4qP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg02355.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772

Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |3dw4rd at verizon dot net

--- Comment #14 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-23 18:57:25 UTC ---
I wonder what the relationship of these expression statements are to lambdas.

Is ({int _a = (a), _b = (b); _a > _b ? _a : _b; })
equivalent to
[](){int _a = (a), _b = (b); _a > _b ? _a : return _b; }}

Can expression statements change enclosing scope variables?  It seems like they
could.  The lambda may need to be mutable.

Maybe these could route to the lambda code.

Just an idle thought.