From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DB5F03858406; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:52:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DB5F03858406
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/77299] [9/10/11/12 Regression] No warning for unused
 "INT64_MAX" and similar constants due macro tracking from system headers
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:52:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cf_known_to_work target_milestone
 cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-77299-4-Bhx7onURAz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-77299-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-77299-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:52:26 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D77299

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|No warning for unused       |[9/10/11/12 Regression] No
                   |"INT64_MAX" and similar     |warning for unused
                   |constants due macro         |"INT64_MAX" and similar
                   |tracking from system        |constants due macro
                   |headers                     |tracking from system
                   |                            |headers
      Known to work|                            |5.1.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.5
      Known to fail|                            |6.1.0

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note inconsistency of INT64_MIN vs INT64_MAX was "fixed" in GCC 9 in that n=
ow
INT64_MAX does not even warn.=