From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A6929386183F; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:20:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A6929386183F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1597958428; bh=qwWDYfDjXI1wUQNmWrHhG6ms8R4WZwzc2m4py6IgaY4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EIHi79YbV6D1NMbzWKTOLxB0P1SaBvcl6BffhIOR2BDBvx8NAdWQ/wBXZHZOWnjCJ 2MnYWom6n803NhDiIk0R076JcBinAMW/9z9ruDX3AhJF6e8GLBEq2+uHrMPjXrO8DQ NuUdi5cPPC2virCwxaqBp26ocRPkmeyIkDEu1kas= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/77303] std::max_element not constexpr with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:20:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:20:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D77303 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This specific issue was fixed for GCC 10.1 by r276260, although the general problem described in PR 71960 isn't fixed.=