public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation
       [not found] <bug-77595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-14 15:24 ` akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
  2020-03-14 15:30 ` akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: akrzemi1 at gmail dot com @ 2020-03-14 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595

Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1 at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|6.1.0                       |10.0
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid

--- Comment #2 from Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1 at gmail dot com> ---
This bug is still present in GCC 10. It is present also in the clang trunk. But
works fine in the previous experimental implementation of concepts in clang:
https://godbolt.org/z/K4SaCm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation
       [not found] <bug-77595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-03-14 15:24 ` [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
@ 2020-03-14 15:30 ` akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
  2020-07-01 17:18 ` okannen at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: akrzemi1 at gmail dot com @ 2020-03-14 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595

--- Comment #3 from Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1 at gmail dot com> ---
The part of the Standard that requires this:
http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.explicit#11

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation
       [not found] <bug-77595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-03-14 15:24 ` [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
  2020-03-14 15:30 ` akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
@ 2020-07-01 17:18 ` okannen at gmail dot com
  2020-07-31  7:28 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
  2021-11-11 22:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: okannen at gmail dot com @ 2020-07-01 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595

--- Comment #4 from Olivier Kannengieser <okannen at gmail dot com> ---
The bug is still there in GCC 10.1, and was the cause of a question of
stackoverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62659801/constrained-member-functions-and-explicit-template-instantiation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation
       [not found] <bug-77595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-01 17:18 ` okannen at gmail dot com
@ 2020-07-31  7:28 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
  2021-11-11 22:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com @ 2020-07-31  7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595

Pilar Latiesa <pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com

--- Comment #5 from Pilar Latiesa <pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com> ---
PR96164 was a duplicate of this one, and has been fixed by
r11-2417-gdc3d1e181445fafbbd146eb355a750c41c338794.

I believe that the fix hasn’t been backported to the GCC 10 branch yet, right?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation
       [not found] <bug-77595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-07-31  7:28 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
@ 2021-11-11 22:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-11 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
      Known to work|                            |10.3.0, 11.1.0
      Known to fail|                            |10.2.0

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 96164.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96164 ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-11 22:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-77595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-14 15:24 ` [Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
2020-03-14 15:30 ` akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
2020-07-01 17:18 ` okannen at gmail dot com
2020-07-31  7:28 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
2021-11-11 22:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).