From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9BD553858C20; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:14:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9BD553858C20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1673302481; bh=07SdPC7mCUT8uM+Y98NUlfWgv1A3GHVIulIsYseGj9Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vYxIQC/xijTDItok9iofVMZT0tGAUFygfqLHZRzwjomYfZDfzUb35kulpOHQnshS5 GlGn1012/Ou4MY507nB/1l7GDEVeVsm3oG7SObIQBPEwiG+o7Xd/r2babwwpvlK0a7 kk6hdkMZguLbR5AiwvXt+i4s5yFgmPSiuuVBZpls= From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/77691] [10/11/12/13 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 22:14:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.anglin at bell dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ro at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D77691 --- Comment #56 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2023-01-09 6:20 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Maybe like this. Actually, the change i sent was for libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/new_delete_resource.cc. It still fails.=C2=A0 No objection to the approach.=