From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2D77D3858403; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:51:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D77D3858403
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:51:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-78054-4-7T1vz7k7Lz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-78054-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-78054-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:51:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D78054

--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> -=
--
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:03:54AM +0000, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> > You either need to remove the above two lines to get a valid program
> > or remove the testcase as it's testing processor dependent behavior.
>=20
> How about changing it to compile-only?  That would avoid interfering with=
 its
> value as a regression-test for PR20670, where it ICE'd.
>=20

I'm fine with that.=