From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ACD003858D37; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:47:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ACD003858D37 From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78054] gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:47:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:47:00 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D78054 Thomas Koenig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #6) > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:03:54AM +0000, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > >=20 > > --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- > > (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > > > You either need to remove the above two lines to get a valid program > > > or remove the testcase as it's testing processor dependent behavior. > >=20 > > How about changing it to compile-only? That would avoid interfering wi= th its > > value as a regression-test for PR20670, where it ICE'd. > >=20 >=20 > I'm fine with that. OK, I will then make that change.=