public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/78113] std::variant and std::visit's current implementations do not get optimized out (compared to "recursive visitation")
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 19:38:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-78113-4-oOQxlc4ucV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-78113-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78113

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfb582f62791dfadc243d97d37f0b83ef77cf480

commit r12-4068-gcfb582f62791dfadc243d97d37f0b83ef77cf480
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue May 4 23:31:48 2021 +0100

    libstdc++: Optimize std::visit for the common case [PR 78113]

    GCC does not do a good job of optimizing the table of function pointers
    used for variant visitation. This avoids using the table for the common
    case of visiting a single variant with a small number of alternative
    types. Instead we use:

      switch(v.index())
      {
      case 0: return visitor(get<0>(v));
      case 1: return visitor(get<1>(v));
      ...
      }

    It's not quite that simple, because get<1>(v) is ill-formed if the
    variant only has one alternative, and similarly for each get<N>.  We
    need to ensure each case only applies the visitor if the index is in
    range for the actual type we're dealing with, and tell the compiler that
    the case is unreachable otherwise. We also need to invoke the visitor
    via the __gen_vtable_impl::__visit_invoke function, to handle the raw
    visitation cases used to implement std::variant assignments and
    comparisons.

    Because that gets quite verbose and repetitive, a macro is used to stamp
    out the cases.

    We also need to handle the valueless_by_exception case, but only for raw
    visitation, because std::visit already checks for it before calling
    __do_visit.

    Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/78113
            * include/std/variant (__do_visit): Use a switch when we have a
            single variant with a small number of alternatives.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-78113-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-12  9:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-01 19:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-10-01 19:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-78113-4-oOQxlc4ucV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).