From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C0C99384645B; Thu,  4 Apr 2024 19:57:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C0C99384645B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712260624;
	bh=JI2PWQ3rcDeABOQGgxiIT2z4b3WU7GfoP8MHqtcud94=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KJxyWZSUHki4d/H6ZQ9r9UD1q9drNsysPMts5WTPWKw+wKtId82auNk/qaCCdv9mW
	 lf2MTcphIxIOz+SzRReEur4P4AM7uDmWvqyLjLyRaIyf10DhMH92/oPR0qCjTB25rv
	 pJqmKD2CacqRoa9lQJqabxTUP0QFZDk+vHiWeVPk=
From: "longb at cray dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in
 the header
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:57:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: longb at cray dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-78219-4-2xpv6sajAU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-78219-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-78219-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D78219

--- Comment #12 from Bill Long <longb at cray dot com> ---
Has this been fixed in a more recent version of gfortran?=