From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1913A3858D34; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 02:18:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1913A3858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713147516;
	bh=MT8r5pLHS6FhYTI7H7XHrsTvcNiFTcibWplyAl4XyDU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LZ5JDIRKUabgMaREfvsvnOuP9wjY4DvZTdPb8TPKu9I+19urx4B7yAMPPHcjKZVaN
	 AYRGFSoNmM2Prz3IkREud6LNkOX/C5pNLNEsyPHazCQ+Lbd0u+Qu0BfzP8N2st+f3Y
	 j3oQ0BHlun4YslXm5OdztD0LhjIG+raQy20oAeQo=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away
 functions
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 02:18:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-78322-4-hgaeImQhyT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-78322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-78322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D78322

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107513

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Blaikie from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > We produce an abstract copy for use by repeated inline copies.
>=20
> Yep! Is it still reasonable to consider it a bug (or at least a feature
> request) that this is still produced even when no inline copies are emitt=
ed?

Not really.=20

Sounds like what you are aiming for is the nodebug attribute that you can u=
se
with always_inline. Basically in dwarf inline functions are still represent=
ed
as functions (calls) and most folks want that for their debugability of the=
ir
program but in this case you specific inlined functions not to have debug i=
nfo
which is exactly what nodebug would do ...=