public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 19:28:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-78352-4-kUXCcIbsBU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-78352-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352

--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #19)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> > Just to add one note, which is that Apple's gcc-4.2.1 implementation for
> > blocks was not actually submitted (and therefore doesn't exist on an FSF
> > server);  it's my understanding that means we cannot use / forward port it.
> > 
> > I'm working on a new version - based on trying to match what clang's current
> > code-gen produces.
> 
> Is this implementation of some use for us?
> https://code.google.com/archive/p/plblocks/

Not for the compiler - the runtime might be useful for 10.5.

I recently brought my patches forward from GCC-5 => GCC-10 (easier to avoid the
.c => .cc file renaming).  Since we now face some problems with sanitiser
support without blocks, this is moved up the TODO.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-04 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-78352-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-11-07 12:36 ` grobian at gentoo dot org
2020-11-07 12:53 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-07 16:29 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-08  9:11 ` grobian at gentoo dot org
2020-11-08  9:25 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-09  8:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-13 21:04 ` egor.pugin at gmail dot com
2022-11-05 19:23 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-06-04 19:01 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-06-04 19:28 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-12-11 22:55 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-12-11 22:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-31  0:58 ` vital.had at gmail dot com
2023-12-31  7:24 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-01  0:57 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-78352-4-kUXCcIbsBU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).