https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78863 --- Comment #3 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Created attachment 40381 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40381&action=edit Untested patch >From gcc-bugs-return-548337-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 14:32:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15955 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 14:32:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15692 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 14:32:05 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78861] sequencer.cpp:603:53: error: cannot convert 'std::basic_istream::__istream_type {aka std::basic_istream}' to 'bool' in assignment Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02500.txt.bz2 Content-length: 256 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78861 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, that will convert the stream to a bool then try to bitshift it. It should be: result = bool( iss >> t.duration >> t.width ); >From gcc-bugs-return-548338-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 14:35:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29657 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 14:35:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29507 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 14:34:53 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78861] sequencer.cpp:603:53: error: cannot convert 'std::basic_istream::__istream_type {aka std::basic_istream}' to 'bool' in assignment Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02501.txt.bz2 Content-length: 338 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78861 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > No, that will convert the stream to a bool then try to bitshift it. > > It should be: > > result = bool( iss >> t.duration >> t.width ); Yeah, sorry. >From gcc-bugs-return-548339-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 14:38:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44727 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 14:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44604 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 14:38:39 -0000 From: "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/71724] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02502.txt.bz2 Content-length: 503 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724 Bernd Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt --- Looks like if_then_else_cond manages to return a false_rtx identical to the original one, and we try to simplify it again. >From gcc-bugs-return-548340-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 14:52:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 74029 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 14:52:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 73977 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 14:52:37 -0000 From: "martin.gansser at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78861] sequencer.cpp:603:53: error: cannot convert 'std::basic_istream::__istream_type {aka std::basic_istream}' to 'bool' in assignment Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: martin.gansser at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02503.txt.bz2 Content-length: 458 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78861 --- Comment #6 from mgansser at alice dot de --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > > No, that will convert the stream to a bool then try to bitshift it. > > > > It should be: > > > > result = bool( iss >> t.duration >> t.width ); > > Yeah, sorry. fine, compiles now w/o problems. Danke >From gcc-bugs-return-548341-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 15:04:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58063 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 15:04:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57326 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 15:04:37 -0000 From: "paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02504.txt.bz2 Content-length: 359 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #5 from Paul Hua --- (In reply to Paul Hua from comment #4) > > Maybe the r242326 cause the bug, the r242324 build success. > The r242326 and r242324 has another bug that r242522 fixed. If use r242326 to reproduce this bug, you should patched the r242522. >From gcc-bugs-return-548342-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 15:09:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3012 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 15:09:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2954 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 15:09:04 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71563] [6/7 Regression] Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer. Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02505.txt.bz2 Content-length: 578 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40382 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40382&action=edit gcc7-pr71563.patch Untested fix. >From gcc-bugs-return-548343-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 15:16:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24597 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 15:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24430 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 15:16:17 -0000 From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78751] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (error: unrecognizable insn) w/ -Os -misel Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02506.txt.bz2 Content-length: 301 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78751 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 40383 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40383&action=edit patch I use this patch as workaround. It, well, sucks. But it does work. >From gcc-bugs-return-548344-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 15:27:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27460 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 15:27:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27338 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 15:27:35 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvNzI3NjRdIFs1LzYvNyBSZWdyZXNzaW9uXSBJQ0Ugb24gaW52?= =?UTF-8?B?YWxpZCBDKysxMSBjb2RlIGluc3RhbnRpYXRpbmcgYW4gYWxpYXMgdGVtcGxh?= =?UTF-8?B?dGU6IHRyZWUgY2hlY2s6IGV4cGVjdGVkIGNsYXNzIOKAmHR5cGXigJksIGhh?= =?UTF-8?B?dmUg4oCYZXhjZXB0aW9uYWzigJkgKGVycm9yX21hcmspIGluIHR5cGVkZWZf?= =?UTF-8?B?dmFyaWFudF9wLCBhdCB0cmVlLmM6MTI2NjA=?Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02507.txt.bz2 Content-length: 856 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems both make_typename_type and finish_decltype_type can return error_mark_node even if the arguments passed to those aren't error_mark_node (as they are called tf_none, no diagnostics is emitted). The question is what strip_typedefs should do if that happens? Shall it return error_mark_node, or the original type, something different? The end of the function assumes that result is a valid type. >From gcc-bugs-return-548345-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 15:53:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68926 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 15:53:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68815 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 15:53:29 -0000 From: "toconnor at forcepoint dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/78839] [6/7 Regression] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: toconnor at forcepoint dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02508.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1347 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839 --- Comment #10 from Tom O'Connor --- In regards to GDB, I noticed that when using a macro to get the offset for these bitfields, with objects built by both GCC 5 and earlier as well as GCC 6, I always get 0. For example: (gdb) macro define offsetof(t, f) &((t *) 0)->f) (gdb) p offsetof(struct s, type) $1 = (unsigned int *) 0x0 Historically, prior to GCC 6, this always matched up with DWARF's DW_AT_data_member_location value for bitfields. Yes, I see how GCC 6's combination of data_member_location and bit_offset can be combined to reach the true location. Historically, my use case has used the data_member_location value to get me the offset into say a raw memory image, for where to start reading data from a field of a structure in memory; I'd do bitfield shifts after reading from the aligned offset as reported in the DWARF structure. If using DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE as data_member_location is nicer and doesn't break the Ada use case, I'd be all for that. But if what's currently being emitted by GCC 6 is considered "more correct" than what previous versions had emitted, then I'll have to adjust. I only noticed the change between 5 and 6 once I started seeing odd results with the same code built by different GCCs. >From gcc-bugs-return-548346-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 15:55:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70296 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 15:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70211 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 15:55:19 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/78808] target_clones not applying to openmp functions Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02509.txt.bz2 Content-length: 961 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- The thing is that the pass_dispatcher_calls runs quite late, as late IPA pass, while the OpenMP outlining is done far earlier. So, we'd need some cgraph node bit to represent OpenMP/OpenACC/Cilk+ outlined functions, and in multiple_targets.c look at the cgraph edges from the functions we are cloning, find out what outlined functions from itself it calls and attempt to clone them too, plus adjust the cloned function to use them instead. Though they are actually called indirectly, so probably there aren't any cgraph edges and we'd have to find it through other means. >From gcc-bugs-return-548347-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 16:11:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12801 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 16:11:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12711 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 16:10:50 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/78871] New: Anonymous namespace and -flto -gsplit-dwarf: ICE in lhd_decl_printable_name, at langhooks.c:215 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02510.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1717 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78871 Bug ID: 78871 Summary: Anonymous namespace and -flto -gsplit-dwarf: ICE in lhd_decl_printable_name, at langhooks.c:215 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- All supported gcc versions are affected: markus@x4 ~ % cat Util.ii namespace { void foo() {} } markus@x4 ~ % g++ -flto -gsplit-dwarf Util.ii Util.ii: In function ‘foo’: Util.ii:2:13: internal compiler error: in lhd_decl_printable_name, at langhooks.c:215 void foo() {} ^ 0x8eec74 lhd_decl_printable_name(tree_node*, int) /home/markus/gcc/gcc/langhooks.c:215 0x6ffa74 gen_namespace_die /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:25009 0x6ffa74 gen_decl_die /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:25215 0x70078e dwarf2out_decl /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:25628 0x706c2f force_decl_die /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:24847 0x706de5 declare_in_namespace /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:24947 0x700127 declare_in_namespace /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:24918 0x700127 gen_decl_die /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:25116 0x70078e dwarf2out_decl /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:25628 0x700cde dwarf2out_function_decl /home/markus/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:25643 0x7762ef rest_of_handle_final /home/markus/gcc/gcc/final.c:4506 0x7762ef execute /home/markus/gcc/gcc/final.c:4548 Please submit a full bug report, >From gcc-bugs-return-548348-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 16:24:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101657 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 16:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101250 invoked by uid 55); 20 Dec 2016 16:24:02 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02511.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1209 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 > > --- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner --- > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #15) > > Sorry, I applied your changes manually and did a typo. The line > > > > SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) = new_reg; > > > > should be removed. > > > > I tested this patch with the typo on x86-64 and no new failures occurred. > > Strange. > > That would suggest on x86-64, SET_SRC (curr_insn_set) is never a subreg for the > insns that we process here. As they say, better to be lucky than good! :-) > With the SPE, we're just not lucky as shown by Joseph's last run. I'm sure it > will pass after removing the unwanted line above. With this fix, my build completes OK and the number of FAILs is down from 105 to 62 in g++.sum and from 246 to 188 in gcc.sum (again, this is a rough comparison with a build from a month ago rather than an exact comparison against unmodified current mainline). >From gcc-bugs-return-548349-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 16:46:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50772 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 16:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50646 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 16:46:02 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/78871] Anonymous namespace and -flto -gsplit-dwarf: ICE in lhd_decl_printable_name, at langhooks.c:215 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02512.txt.bz2 Content-length: 630 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78871 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-12-20 CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Confirmed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 17:10:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79066 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 17:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 78768 invoked by uid 55); 20 Dec 2016 17:10:08 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02513.txt.bz2 Content-length: 210 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think the append_to_statement_list version should be preferred. >From gcc-bugs-return-548351-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 17:14:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106099 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 17:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105780 invoked by uid 55); 20 Dec 2016 17:13:47 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/77754] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error : tree code 'call_expr' is not supported in LTO streams Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02514.txt.bz2 Content-length: 483 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77754 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > So, where would be the best place to remove the VLA bounds from parameters of > fn declarations? Some function called from c_write_global_declarations_1 and > from walking BLOCK tree vars e.g. right before calling c_genericize in > finish_function? That would seem reasonable. >From gcc-bugs-return-548352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 18:56:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21639 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 18:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20339 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 18:55:47 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02515.txt.bz2 Content-length: 264 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately that version breaks the pr49120.c testcase, because mark_exp_read doesn't deal with STATEMENT_LISTs. I'll test the other patch. >From gcc-bugs-return-548353-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 19:17:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42943 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 19:17:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42750 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 19:16:58 -0000 From: "meissner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/70568] [5/6/7 regression] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: meissner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02516.txt.bz2 Content-length: 187 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- *** Bug 78823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >From gcc-bugs-return-548354-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 19:17:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42958 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 19:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42668 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 19:16:56 -0000 From: "meissner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78823] Poor code on PowerPC when moving SFmode values between GPRs and vector registers Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: meissner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: meissner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02517.txt.bz2 Content-length: 528 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78823 Michael Meissner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- This bug is a duplicate of 70568. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 70568 *** >From gcc-bugs-return-548355-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 19:20:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 60659 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 19:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 60447 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 19:20:09 -0000 From: "meissner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/70568] [5/6/7 regression] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: meissner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02518.txt.bz2 Content-length: 535 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 Michael Meissner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work| |4.8.5 Known to fail| |4.9.4, 5.4.1, 6.2.1, 7.0 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- I noticed this bug and created PR 78823. Since that's the same bug as this, I'll take it. >From gcc-bugs-return-548356-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 19:41:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93922 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 19:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93737 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 19:41:42 -0000 From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02519.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1867 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner --- With the patch Vlad attached minus the one unwanted line/typo, I'm getting an ICE on a powerpc64le-linux bootstrap. Looking into it. /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__floatuntisf’: /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1819:1: internal compiler error: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:965 } ^ 0x10a8eaaf lra_set_insn_recog_data(rtx_insn*) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:963 0x10a8b8d7 lra_get_insn_recog_data /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra-int.h:487 0x10a9142f lra_update_insn_regno_info(rtx_insn*) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:1585 0x10a91e4f lra_push_insn_1 /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:1736 0x10a91eb3 lra_push_insn(rtx_insn*) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:1744 0x10a92113 push_insns /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:1787 0x10a92447 lra_process_new_insns(rtx_insn*, rtx_insn*, rtx_insn*, char const*) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:1835 0x10aa7ecb check_and_process_move /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra-constraints.c:1261 0x10ab11f3 curr_insn_transform /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3709 0x10ab5bf3 lra_constraints(bool) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4705 0x10a9435b lra(_IO_FILE*) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:2377 0x10a0fb2f do_reload /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/ira.c:5400 0x10a10363 execute /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/ira.c:5584 >From gcc-bugs-return-548357-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 20:11:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112806 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 20:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112699 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 20:11:02 -0000 From: "jmichae3 at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78872] New: g++ refuses const trailing a function declaration. Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jmichae3 at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02520.txt.bz2 Content-length: 641 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78872 Bug ID: 78872 Summary: g++ refuses const trailing a function declaration. Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jmichae3 at yahoo dot com Target Milestone: --- #include #include #include #include namespace std { int locale::icompare(const char_type* low1, const char_type* high1, const char_type*low2, const char_type* high2) const; }; >From gcc-bugs-return-548358-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 20:18:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1128 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 20:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1050 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 20:18:32 -0000 From: "jmichae3 at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78872] g++ refuses const trailing a function declaration. Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jmichae3 at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02521.txt.bz2 Content-length: 721 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78872 --- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels --- icompare.cpp:12:119: error: no 'int std::locale::icompare(const char_type*, const char_type*, const char_type*, const char_type*) const' member function declared in class 'std::locale' int locale::icompare(const char_type* low1, const char_type* high1, const char_type*low2, const char_type* high2) const; ^~~~~ >From gcc-bugs-return-548359-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 20:21:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26868 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 20:20:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26755 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 20:20:47 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/52192] GCC_CHECK_TLS doesn't detect native TLS on Solaris 8/9 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02522.txt.bz2 Content-length: 207 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Should we change the target to *-*-netbsd* now that solaris 8 and 9 are not supported? >From gcc-bugs-return-548360-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 20:22:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 36249 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 20:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 35092 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 20:22:22 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78872] g++ refuses const trailing a function declaration. Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02523.txt.bz2 Content-length: 653 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78872 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2016-12-20 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see why you think this is a bug. There is no function called std::locale::icompare in the declared class std::locale. This is what the error message exactly says even. >From gcc-bugs-return-548361-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 21:07:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93121 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 21:07:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93022 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 21:07:46 -0000 From: "jmichae3 at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78842] "error: declaration of 'bool icase' shadows a parameter" should be warning Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jmichae3 at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02524.txt.bz2 Content-length: 796 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78842 --- Comment #5 from Jim Michaels --- I am going to have to go digging through my code. the function that I had this error on about icase shadowing a parameter was a global var, and I tried #include #include #include bool icase=false; std::vector find_vsizet(std::string haystack, std::string needle, bool icase=false, size_t pos=0){ return {0}; } int main(){ std::vector vst=find_vsizet("1","2",false,0); for (int i=0; i < vst.size(); i++) { std::cout<From gcc-bugs-return-548362-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 21:10:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97009 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 21:10:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96886 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 21:10:34 -0000 From: "jmichae3 at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78842] "error: declaration of 'bool icase' shadows a parameter" should be warning Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jmichae3 at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02525.txt.bz2 Content-length: 296 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78842 --- Comment #6 from Jim Michaels --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #4) > sigh, bugzilla's moving on to 'random' other bug gets me. Again. btw, I think that random bug number feature is in preferences. >From gcc-bugs-return-548363-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 21:27:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121332 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 21:27:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118797 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 21:27:36 -0000 From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02526.txt.bz2 Content-length: 3764 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #18) > With the patch Vlad attached minus the one unwanted line/typo, I'm getting > an ICE on a powerpc64le-linux bootstrap. Looking into it. Here's a minimal test case: bergner@genoa:~/gcc/BUGS/PR78516$ cat libgcc2.i float fn1 (__int128 a) { if ((unsigned)a == a) return a; } bergner@genoa:~/gcc/BUGS/PR78516$ /home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/./gcc/ -O2 -S libgcc2.i libgcc2.i: In function ‘fn1’: libgcc2.i:6:1: internal compiler error: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:965 } ^ 0x10a8eaaf lra_set_insn_recog_data(rtx_insn*) /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-pr78516/gcc/lra.c:963 We have the following insn after IRA: (insn 13 12 31 4 (set (reg:SF 157 [ ]) (float:SF (subreg:DI (reg/v:TI 158 [ aD.2516 ]) 0))) "libgcc2.i":5 407 {floatdisf2_fcfids} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:TI 158 [ aD.2516 ]) (nil))) With pseudo 157 being assigned to fp reg fr1 and pseudo 158 being assigned to r3. The floatdisf2_fcfids pattern looks like: (define_insn "floatdisf2_fcfids" [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=f,wy") (float:SF (match_operand:DI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "d,wi")))] "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_FPRS && TARGET_SINGLE_FLOAT && TARGET_DOUBLE_FLOAT && TARGET_FCFIDS" "@ fcfids %0,%1 xscvsxdsp %x0,%x1" [(set_attr "type" "fp")]) ...so pseudo 158 does not match the pattern's constraints. check_and_process_move() doesn't handle this type of insn, so it returns false and eventually, we generate the following two insns (haven't tracked down where they come from yet): (insn 38 12 13 4 (set (reg:DI 165) (subreg:DI (reg/v:TI 158 [ a ]) 0)) "libgcc2.i":5 582 {*movdi_internal64} (nil)) (insn 13 38 31 4 (set (reg:SF 157 [ ]) (float:SF (reg:DI 165))) "libgcc2.i":5 407 {floatdisf2_fcfids} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:TI 158 [ a ]) (nil))) This maybe looks ok (?), except for the REG_DEAD on insn 13 should have been removed and added to the new insn 38. Later, check_and_process_move() is called again, this time for the new insn 38 and this is where we end up ICEing. We end up seeing: (gdb) pr dest (reg:DI 165) (gdb) pr dreg (reg:DI 165) (gdb) p dclass $54 = FLOAT_REGS (gdb) p dregno $55 = 165 (gdb) pr src (subreg:DI (reg/v:TI 158 [ a ]) 0) (gdb) pr sreg (reg/v:TI 158 [ a ]) (gdb) p sregno $56 = -1 (gdb) p sclass $57 = BASE_REGS (gdb) p secondary_class $58 = NO_REGS Due to the above, new_reg == NULL_RTX and sri.icode == CODE_FOR_reload_vsx_from_gprti. This pushes us down the else clause of the following if: if (sri.icode == CODE_FOR_nothing) lra_emit_move (new_reg, sreg); else { enum reg_class scratch_class; scratch_class = (reg_class_from_constraints (insn_data[sri.icode].operand[2].constraint)); scratch_reg = (lra_create_new_reg_with_unique_value (insn_data[sri.icode].operand[2].mode, NULL_RTX, scratch_class, "scratch")); emit_insn (GEN_FCN (sri.icode) (new_reg != NULL_RTX ? new_reg : dest, new_reg != NULL_RTX ? sreg : src, scratch_reg)); } We then up calling gen_reload_vsx_from_gprti() via the emit_insn() with: op0, op1 and op2 as: (gdb) pr operand0 (reg:DI 165) (gdb) pr operand1 (subreg:DI (reg/v:TI 158 [ a ]) 0) (gdb) pr operand2 (reg:IF 166) That subreg for operand1 does not look correct to me. >From gcc-bugs-return-548364-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 22:55:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100874 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 22:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100789 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 22:55:03 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78872] g++ refuses const trailing a function declaration. Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02527.txt.bz2 Content-length: 594 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78872 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- You can't just declare new functions of std::locale, that type is controlled by the standard library, not by you. Please stop filing bugs here until you learn basic C++. >From gcc-bugs-return-548365-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 23:02:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116391 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 23:02:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116209 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 23:02:43 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78842] "error: declaration of 'bool icase' shadows a parameter" should be warning Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02528.txt.bz2 Content-length: 913 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78842 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Presumably you had a local variable 'icase' in your function, because you wouldn't get a diagnostic saying "shadows a parameter" for a global variable. That's impossible. It's an error if the local variable is in the outermost block of the function, because it declares two variables of the same name in the same scope: void find_vsizet(bool icase=false) { bool icase = false; // error { bool icase = false; // ok here, only a warning } } >From gcc-bugs-return-548366-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 23:06:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117978 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 23:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116601 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 23:06:17 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02529.txt.bz2 Content-length: 746 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan Niklas Hasse from comment #2) > I'm willing to help. Great! Please read https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/appendix_contributing.html especially the part about legal paperwork. > Is there an existing starting point for Windows? Can > boost::filesystem's implementation be used? No. Just look at the existing code and figure out what the equivalent code would be for Windows, and write an alternative implementation e.g. replace calls to POSIX stat() with whatever Windows uses to query file properties, and replace calls to POSIX chmod with whatever Windows uses to change file permissions. >From gcc-bugs-return-548367-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 23:07:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119112 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 23:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119031 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 23:07:42 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/71444] Error constants for MinGW-w64 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02530.txt.bz2 Content-length: 202 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- In fact it looks like the patch should work for mingw-w64 v4, and maybe v3 too. >From gcc-bugs-return-548368-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 23:19:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1385 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 23:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1264 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 23:18:55 -0000 From: "ambrop7 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78873] New: Virtual call after conversion to base class pointer is not devirtualized Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ambrop7 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02531.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1531 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78873 Bug ID: 78873 Summary: Virtual call after conversion to base class pointer is not devirtualized Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ambrop7 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following test case shows the issue. The generated code for TestDevirtualization could perform a direct call to Impl::Foo but it performs a call via the vtable. #include struct Iface { virtual void Foo() = 0; }; struct Impl : public Iface { __attribute__ ((noinline)) void Foo() override final { printf("Impl::Foo\n"); } }; template __attribute__ ((noinline)) void TestDevirtualuzation(Type *obj) { static_cast(obj)->Foo(); } int main() { Impl impl; TestDevirtualuzation(&impl); return 0; } I have heard arguments that optimizing this would not be legal, with the following test case which supposedly might be valid: struct Liar : Iface { void Foo() {} }; Impl impl; TestDevirtualuzation(reinterpret_cast(&impl)); But I think it is not valid; the result of the reinterpret_cast does not point to a Liar object, so the static_cast done in TestDevirtualuzation *should* be invalid. I couldn't find a clear statement in the standard about this though. >From gcc-bugs-return-548369-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 20 23:59:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122951 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 23:59:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122780 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2016 23:58:49 -0000 From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02532.txt.bz2 Content-length: 703 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #20 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #19) > emit_insn (GEN_FCN (sri.icode) (new_reg != NULL_RTX ? new_reg : dest, > new_reg != NULL_RTX ? sreg : src, > scratch_reg)); > } [snip] > That subreg for operand1 does not look correct to me. Vlad, for the following change in the hunk above: > new_reg != NULL_RTX ? sreg : src, shouldn't that always be just "sreg"? Ie, why are we testing for new_reg != NULL_RTX and sometimes passing in "src"? >From gcc-bugs-return-548370-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 00:08:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5778 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 00:08:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5631 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 00:08:22 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02533.txt.bz2 Content-length: 612 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 00:07:49 2016 New Revision: 243832 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243832&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/77767 * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If *expr is non-NULL, append expression to *expr instead of overwriting it. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr77767.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr77767.c Modified: trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/c/c-decl.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548371-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 02:18:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117956 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 02:18:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117882 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 02:18:34 -0000 From: "jzwinck at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78874] New: Manual describes "-Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations" as if without "no-" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jzwinck at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02534.txt.bz2 Content-length: 842 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78874 Bug ID: 78874 Summary: Manual describes "-Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations" as if without "no-" Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jzwinck at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The gcc and g++ man pages say: -Wno-aggressive-loop-optimizations Warn if in a loop with constant number of iterations the compiler detects undefined behavior in some statement during one or more of the iterations. The "no-" here is a mistake: -Waggressive-loop-optimizations enables the message and -Wno-* turns it off. Demo: https://godbolt.org/g/1ICxI5 >From gcc-bugs-return-548372-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 04:21:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102473 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 04:21:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102368 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 04:21:46 -0000 From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02535.txt.bz2 Content-length: 502 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #21 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #20) > Vlad, for the following change in the hunk above: > > > new_reg != NULL_RTX ? sreg : src, > > shouldn't that always be just "sreg"? Ie, why are we testing for new_reg != > NULL_RTX and sometimes passing in "src"? Well we still ICE even with that, so this will take more digging. >From gcc-bugs-return-548373-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 04:24:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104365 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 04:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104250 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 04:24:26 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78767] [7 Regression] ICE when inheriting constructor of base class Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02536.txt.bz2 Content-length: 378 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78767 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org >From gcc-bugs-return-548374-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 04:39:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113744 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 04:39:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113484 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 04:39:26 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78749] [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member function in anonymous namespace Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02537.txt.bz2 Content-length: 378 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org >From gcc-bugs-return-548375-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 07:39:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110855 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 07:39:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110739 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 07:38:47 -0000 From: "benh at kernel dot crashing.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78875] New: -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: benh at kernel dot crashing.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02538.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1473 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78875 Bug ID: 78875 Summary: -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: benh at kernel dot crashing.org Target Milestone: --- Some standalone (not linked with glibc) programs such as the Linux Kernel or the OPAL firmware do not have a TLS per-se. They use r13 for different purposes (both examples here use it as some kind of per-cpu pointer). Depending on gcc version and how it was built, the canary used by -fstack-protector on powerpc64 is either loaded from a global (r2 relative) or from the TLS (r13). The latter case won't work for those programs. I looked into doing like x86 and basically maintaining an equivalent of that portion of the TLS space for this, but the offset used -0x7000 really doesn't work with either Linux or OPAL without major changes to how they use r13. In the meantime, it would be useful to still be able to exploit the stack protector, to be able to force via a gcc command line option, the use of globals instead of TLS (and in general disable any built-in access to the TLS for projects that have a special runtime environment that doesn't use r13 for that purpose). >From gcc-bugs-return-548376-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 08:11:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97429 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 08:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97319 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 08:10:59 -0000 From: "fmarchal at perso dot be" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78876] New: Wording error in Wpedantic-ms-format description Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fmarchal at perso dot be X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02539.txt.bz2 Content-length: 632 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78876 Bug ID: 78876 Summary: Wording error in Wpedantic-ms-format description Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: fmarchal at perso dot be Target Milestone: --- The description for Wpedantic-ms-format in gcc/config/i386/mingw.opt at line 29 is: "Warn about none ISO msvcrt scanf/printf width extensions." I'm pretty sure it should be "non-ISO" or something similar. >From gcc-bugs-return-548377-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 08:31:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 77931 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 08:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 77793 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 08:31:13 -0000 From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78867] [7 Regression] GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02540.txt.bz2 Content-length: 224 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist --- Ok, I think I figured it out; like Richard said, it's a missing DECL_EXPR issue. Patch incoming shortly.- >From gcc-bugs-return-548378-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:02:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69533 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:02:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69406 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:01:49 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02541.txt.bz2 Content-length: 524 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The parallel isn't needed, and we ICE both explicitly mapped and implicitly mapped assumed-size arrays. This is a bug in the standard, it doesn't restrict mapping from mapping assumed-size arrays, even when they actually can't be mapped (because the size is not known). At least the definition of mappable type for Fortran does not exclude assumed-size arrays, and they aren't listed as disallowed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548379-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:25:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 84824 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:25:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 72638 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:24:45 -0000 From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78867] [7 Regression] GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02542.txt.bz2 Content-length: 576 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 Janne Blomqvist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- | |patches/2016-12/msg01750.ht | |ml --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist --- Patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01750.html >From gcc-bugs-return-548380-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:29:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8772 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:29:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8702 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:29:47 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/78877] New: Missing suggestion for -fsanitize­dres Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: driver X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02543.txt.bz2 Content-length: 874 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877 Bug ID: 78877 Summary: Missing suggestion for -fsanitize=addres Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Currently, we do not suggest '-fsanitize=address' for '-fsanitize=addres', which replacing equal symbol with dash works fine. $ echo | ./xgcc -B. -fsanitize=addres -xc - xgcc: error: unrecognized argument to -fsanitize= option: ‘addres’ $ echo | ./xgcc -B. -fsanitize-addres -xc - xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fsanitize-addres’; did you mean ‘-fsanitize=address’? >From gcc-bugs-return-548381-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:32:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10754 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10635 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:32:24 -0000 From: "pawel_sikora at zoho dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/78878] New: stacktrace engine can't use compressed/separated debug info for extracting symbols. Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pawel_sikora at zoho dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02544.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2137 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78878 Bug ID: 78878 Summary: stacktrace engine can't use compressed/separated debug info for extracting symbols. Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pawel_sikora at zoho dot com CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40384 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40384&action=edit testcase hi, i've noticed that compressed debuginfo (or externally accessible via .gnu_debuglink section) is not used for decorating sanitizer stacktrace. e.g.: ================================================================= ==6290==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f4d243840ce in operator new(unsigned long) (/lib64/liblsan.so.0+0xe0ce) #1 0x400693 (/home/pawels/bugs/mem-leak/m+0x400693) #2 0x40069f (/home/pawels/bugs/mem-leak/m+0x40069f) #3 0x7f4d23728400 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20400) without compression/debuglink the stacktrace is more readable: ================================================================= ==6318==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7efe533370ce in operator new(unsigned long) (/lib64/liblsan.so.0+0xe0ce) #1 0x400693 in leak() /home/pawels/bugs/mem-leak/m.cpp:4 #2 0x40069f in main /home/pawels/bugs/mem-leak/m.cpp:8 #3 0x7efe526db400 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20400) >From gcc-bugs-return-548383-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:42:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 73457 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 55954 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 09:41:59 -0000 From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78867] [7 Regression] GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02546.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1112 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Dec 21 09:41:25 2016 New Revision: 243842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243842&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 78867 Function returning string ICE with -flto The fix for PR 78757 was slightly too cautious, and covered only the case of functions returning pointers to characters. By moving the block above the if statement the DECL_EXPR is created also for functions returning non-pointer characters. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. fortran ChangeLog: 2016-12-21 Janne Blomqvist PR fortran/78867 * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Emit DECL_EXPR also for non-pointer character results. testsuite ChangeLog: 2016-12-21 Janne Blomqvist PR fortran/78867 * gfortran.dg/string_length_4.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/string_length_4.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548382-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:42:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 72921 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57064 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 09:42:00 -0000 From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78757] [7 Regression] ICE with function returning a pointer to a character Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02545.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1112 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Dec 21 09:41:25 2016 New Revision: 243842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243842&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 78867 Function returning string ICE with -flto The fix for PR 78757 was slightly too cautious, and covered only the case of functions returning pointers to characters. By moving the block above the if statement the DECL_EXPR is created also for functions returning non-pointer characters. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. fortran ChangeLog: 2016-12-21 Janne Blomqvist PR fortran/78867 * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Emit DECL_EXPR also for non-pointer character results. testsuite ChangeLog: 2016-12-21 Janne Blomqvist PR fortran/78867 * gfortran.dg/string_length_4.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/string_length_4.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548384-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:46:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 84145 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83977 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:46:06 -0000 From: "coolypf at qq dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] New: -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: coolypf at qq dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02547.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1663 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 Bug ID: 78879 Summary: -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: coolypf at qq dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40385 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40385&action=edit test case When building Linux kernel 3.10 for aarch64 with -fprofile-generate, I encountered undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'. Here are steps to reproduce: coolypf@experiment:~$ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/6.2.1/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c --disable-threads --disable-nls --disable-tls --disable-plugin --disable-bootstrap --disable-werror --enable-cloog-backend=isl --disable-lto --enable-multiarch --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu Thread model: single gcc version 6.2.1 20161221 (GCC) coolypf@experiment:~$ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 test.i coolypf@experiment:~$ nm test.o | grep ilog2 coolypf@experiment:~$ aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 -fprofile-generate test.i coolypf@experiment:~$ nm test.o | grep ilog2 U ____ilog2_NaN Related source code location is http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/scsi/sd.c?v=3.10#L2197 >From gcc-bugs-return-548385-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:47:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106508 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:47:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102866 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:47:16 -0000 From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78867] [7 Regression] GFortran function returning string ICE with -flto Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jb at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02548.txt.bz2 Content-length: 439 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78867 Janne Blomqvist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist --- Fixed on trunk, closing. >From gcc-bugs-return-548386-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:48:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111683 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:48:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110102 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 09:48:29 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/52192] GCC_CHECK_TLS doesn't detect native TLS on Solaris 8/9 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02549.txt.bz2 Content-length: 407 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52192 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Should we change the target to *-*-netbsd* now that solaris 8 and 9 are not > supported? Certainly: I've no intention on working on the Solaris side of this anymore. Rainer >From gcc-bugs-return-548387-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:49:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113228 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111695 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:48:52 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02550.txt.bz2 Content-length: 425 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- See discussion in PR72785. >From gcc-bugs-return-548388-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:50:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125398 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117742 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 09:50:15 -0000 From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/70311] libgfortran build dies on "implicit declaration of function strncasecmp" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02551.txt.bz2 Content-length: 667 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70311 --- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Wed Dec 21 09:49:40 2016 New Revision: 243843 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243843&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libfortran/70311 * intrinsics/selected_char_kind.c: Include header. * runtime/environ.c: Include header. * runtime/string.c: Include header. Modified: trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog trunk/libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_char_kind.c trunk/libgfortran/runtime/environ.c trunk/libgfortran/runtime/string.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548389-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:53:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7531 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7336 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:52:58 -0000 From: "pawel_sikora at zoho dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/77982] deadlock in asan thread initialization/interception. Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pawel_sikora at zoho dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02552.txt.bz2 Content-length: 318 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77982 --- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #11) > Created attachment 39882 [details] > Untested fix > > Untested fix (works for me with attached testcase). > this fix works for me. thanks. >From gcc-bugs-return-548390-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 09:55:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12548 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 09:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12429 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 09:55:16 -0000 From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/70311] libgfortran build dies on "implicit declaration of function strncasecmp" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02553.txt.bz2 Content-length: 623 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70311 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- The issue is fixed. For strnlen(), indeed I think a proper fix should be in mingw32. >From gcc-bugs-return-548391-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:10:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58586 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:10:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58528 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:10:40 -0000 From: "coolypf at qq dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: coolypf at qq dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02554.txt.bz2 Content-length: 241 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #2 from Yuan Pengfei --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > See discussion in PR72785. I am using GCC 6.2.1. Is it the same problem? >From gcc-bugs-return-548392-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:16:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57431 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:16:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57259 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:16:42 -0000 From: "venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02555.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1212 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #9 from Venkataramanan --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Sure, the question is (raised several times over the last couple of years) > is if the generic tuning should not adjust slightly based on the selected > ISAs. > AVX2 is right now only supported by Intel CPUs and bdver4/znver1 from the > AMD CPUs. The Intel CPUs don't want this kind of tuning, dunno if > bdver4/znver1 prefers such splitting or not. If not and it is limited only > to older AMD chips, the question is whether it shouldn't be removed from the > generic tuning, or if narrowing the set of CPUs (by adding further ISAs) > can't change some properties of the generic tuning (say define generic+avx2 > and generic+avx512f tunings that would be enabled for generic tuning if > MASK_AVX2 or MASK_AVX512F is set). I did some benchmarking on AMD avx2 target with and without unaligned avx256 load splitting. Noticing regressions when we allow the splitting of avx256 unaligned loads. Already for AMD AVX2 target, splitting is turned off. So I suggest not to do avx256 unaligned load splitting for generic also. >From gcc-bugs-return-548393-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:20:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 84726 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83705 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:20:01 -0000 From: "jzwinck at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/63387] Optimize pairs of isnan() calls into a single isunordered() Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jzwinck at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02556.txt.bz2 Content-length: 470 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63387 John Zwinck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from John Zwinck --- I confirm this is fixed in GCC 6.1. Thank you very much. >From gcc-bugs-return-548394-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:33:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 37273 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20047 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:33:12 -0000 From: "rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/78880] New: [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02557.txt.bz2 Content-length: 7861 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880 Bug ID: 78880 Summary: [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de Target Milestone: --- Revision 243196 breaks native bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32 using --with-sysroot to point gcc to the mingw-w64 runtime. This used to work since years until then. The bootstrap fails in stage 1 building libgcc due to not finding the runtime libraries: mv tmp-libgcc.map libgcc.map # @multilib_flags@ is still needed because this may use # /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0/./gcc/ -L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib -L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/mingw/lib -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/mingw/include -B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ -B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/ -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-include and -O2 -I../../../../../../../../opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-7.0.0/libgcc/../winsup/w32api/include -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -g -DIN_LIBGCC2 -fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector directly. # @multilib_dir@ is not really necessary, but sometimes it has # more uses than just a directory name. /bin/sh ../../../../../../../../opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-7.0.0/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs . cp -p -f libgcc.map libgcc.map.def && if [ ! -d ./shlib ]; then mkdir ./shlib; else true; fi && /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0/./gcc/ -L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib -L/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/mingw/lib -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/mingw/include -B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ -B/opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/ -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include -isystem /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-include -O2 -I../../../../../../../../opt/devel/gnu/src/gcc-mingw-w64/gcc-7.0.0/libgcc/../winsup/w32api/include -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -g -DIN_LIBGCC2 -fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector -pthread -shared -nodefaultlibs libgcc.map.def -Wl,--out-implib,./shlib/libgcc_s.a.tmp -o ./shlib/libgcc_s_seh-1.dll.tmp -g -O2 -B./ _chkstk_s.o _chkstk_ms_s.o _muldi3_s.o _negdi2_s.o _lshrdi3_s.o _ashldi3_s.o _ashrdi3_s.o _cmpdi2_s.o _ucmpdi2_s.o _clear_cache_s.o _trampoline_s.o __main_s.o _absvsi2_s.o _absvdi2_s.o _addvsi3_s.o _addvdi3_s.o _subvsi3_s.o _subvdi3_s.o _mulvsi3_s.o _mulvdi3_s.o _negvsi2_s.o _negvdi2_s.o _ctors_s.o _ffssi2_s.o _ffsdi2_s.o _clz_s.o _clzsi2_s.o _clzdi2_s.o _ctzsi2_s.o _ctzdi2_s.o _popcount_tab_s.o _popcountsi2_s.o _popcountdi2_s.o _paritysi2_s.o _paritydi2_s.o _powisf2_s.o _powidf2_s.o _powixf2_s.o _powitf2_s.o _mulhc3_s.o _mulsc3_s.o _muldc3_s.o _mulxc3_s.o _multc3_s.o _divhc3_s.o _divsc3_s.o _divdc3_s.o _divxc3_s.o _divtc3_s.o _bswapsi2_s.o _bswapdi2_s.o _clrsbsi2_s.o _clrsbdi2_s.o _fixunssfsi_s.o _fixunsdfsi_s.o _fixunsxfsi_s.o _fixsfdi_s.o _fixdfdi_s.o _fixxfdi_s.o _fixunssfdi_s.o _fixunsdfdi_s.o _fixunsxfdi_s.o _floatdisf_s.o _floatdidf_s.o _floatdixf_s.o _floatundisf_s.o _floatundidf_s.o _floatundixf_s.o _divdi3_s.o _moddi3_s.o _divmoddi4_s.o _udivdi3_s.o _umoddi3_s.o _udivmoddi4_s.o _udiv_w_sdiv_s.o cpuinfo_s.o sfp-exceptions_s.o addtf3_s.o divtf3_s.o eqtf2_s.o getf2_s.o letf2_s.o multf3_s.o negtf2_s.o subtf3_s.o unordtf2_s.o fixtfsi_s.o fixunstfsi_s.o floatsitf_s.o floatunsitf_s.o fixtfdi_s.o fixunstfdi_s.o floatditf_s.o floatunditf_s.o fixtfti_s.o fixunstfti_s.o floattitf_s.o floatuntitf_s.o extendsftf2_s.o extenddftf2_s.o extendxftf2_s.o trunctfsf2_s.o trunctfdf2_s.o trunctfxf2_s.o enable-execute-stack_s.o unwind-seh_s.o unwind-sjlj_s.o unwind-c_s.o emutls_s.o libgcc.a -Wl,-lpthread -lmingwthrd -lmingw32 -lmingwex -lmoldname -lmsvcrt -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -luser32 -lkernel32 && if [ -f ./shlib/libgcc_s_seh-1.dll ]; then mv -f ./shlib/libgcc_s_seh-1.dll ./shlib/libgcc_s_seh-1.dll.backup; else true; fi && mv ./shlib/libgcc_s_seh-1.dll.tmp ./shlib/libgcc_s_seh-1.dll && mv ./shlib/libgcc_s.a.tmp ./shlib/libgcc_s.a D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find dllcrt2.o: No such file or directory D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lpthread D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lmingwthrd D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lmingw32 D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lmingwex D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lmoldname D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lmsvcrt D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -ladvapi32 D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lshell32 D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -luser32 D:\opt\devel\gnu\gcc\MINGW_NT\x86_64-w64-mingw32\mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn\gcc-7.0.0\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lkernel32 collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [Makefile:976: libgcc_s.dll] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0/x86_64-w64-mingw32/libgcc' make[2]: *** [Makefile:17977: all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0' make[1]: *** [Makefile:23000: stage1-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.gxxTu9rzHn/gcc-7.0.0/gcc-7.0.0' make: *** [Makefile:938: all] Error 2 Revision 243195 is fine. >From gcc-bugs-return-548395-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:35:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96250 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96075 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:34:59 -0000 From: "linux at carewolf dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linux at carewolf dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02558.txt.bz2 Content-length: 227 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #10 from Allan Jensen --- That would solve the problem, but also leave the behavior as Sandybridge only (nehalem didn't have AVX). >From gcc-bugs-return-548396-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:38:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105844 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:38:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105635 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:38:42 -0000 From: "linux at carewolf dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linux at carewolf dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02559.txt.bz2 Content-length: 210 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #11 from Allan Jensen --- Btw, did you benchmark store splitting on AMD? It is also enabled for BDVER and ZNVER1. >From gcc-bugs-return-548397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:47:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124397 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:47:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121689 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:46:49 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02560.txt.bz2 Content-length: 430 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #2) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > See discussion in PR72785. > > I am using GCC 6.2.1. Is it the same problem? Yes, I think so. The compiler is under no obligation to optimize the ____ilog2_NaN call away. It looks like a kernel bug. >From gcc-bugs-return-548400-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:54:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93974 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93201 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:19 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02563.txt.bz2 Content-length: 455 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coolypf at qq dot com --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- *** Bug 78879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >From gcc-bugs-return-548398-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:54:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 92460 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 92316 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:53:54 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02561.txt.bz2 Content-length: 507 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #19 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Lets close this one as invalid. It looks like a kernel bug after all. >From gcc-bugs-return-548399-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:54:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93576 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93150 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:18 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02562.txt.bz2 Content-length: 504 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 72785 *** >From gcc-bugs-return-548403-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98480 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98292 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:55 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6/7 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02565.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548404-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98568 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98044 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:46 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71020] [6 Regression] SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE. Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02567.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71020 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548411-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:56:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103227 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101893 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:31 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/65139] Improve register allocation for aarch64_*_sisd_or_int3 patterns Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02570.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548408-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101531 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100194 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:14 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/69823] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02571.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548405-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99838 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98467 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/70359] [6/7 Regression] Code size increase for ARM compared to gcc-5.3.0 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02568.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548406-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101373 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99896 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:12 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78152] [6/7 Regression] coarray and associate Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02573.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548402-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98455 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98093 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:48 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71824] [6/7 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop optimizations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02566.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548407-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101460 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100747 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:19 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68682] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] loop interchange no longer working after r227277 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02569.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68682 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548410-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:56:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102248 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101538 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:28 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02572.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548413-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:57:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104472 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102160 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:34 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/66403] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-self.c FAILs with PIE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02574.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548401-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98435 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98171 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:51 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02564.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548414-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:57:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105364 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102355 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:36 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77626] [6 Regression] ICE with -Wall on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, byte_from_pos, cxx_fold_indirect_ref) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02580.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548409-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:55:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101983 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98351 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:54:56 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02577.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548418-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:59:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107600 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102741 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:41 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02578.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548419-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:59:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108787 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103330 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:46 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/68717] [6/7 Regression] New (bogus?) warnings when compiling some gfortran.dg tests with -flto after r231239 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02579.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68717 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548417-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:59:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107522 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103124 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:45 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/65642] [C++11] GCC rejects valid constant expression Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02576.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548415-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:57:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105422 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102226 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:35 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/68664] PowerPC: speculative sqrt in c-ray main loop causes large slow down Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02581.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548416-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:58:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106221 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102546 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:39 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/70164] [6/7 Regression] Code/performance regression due to poor register allocation on Cortex-M0 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02575.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548412-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 10:56:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103275 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102004 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:33 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/66250] Can't adjust complex nor decimal floating point modes Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02582.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66250 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548423-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:01:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113821 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104889 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:04 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02584.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548421-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:00:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110774 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104070 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:55 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/68560] [6/7 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02583.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548424-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:02:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115546 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105174 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:06 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/65534] tailcall not optimized away Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02585.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548429-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:04:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124096 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106104 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:17 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/69513] LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02589.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548422-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:01:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112127 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104521 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:00 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/66401] g++.dg/ubsan/vla-1.C FAILs with PIE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02587.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66401 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548420-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:00:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109799 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103503 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:55:49 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/67710] FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-*version-*.c (test for excess errors) with Xcode 7 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ro at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02588.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548425-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:02:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115584 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105291 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:08 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68644] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02591.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548427-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:03:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118913 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105703 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:13 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71208] [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02590.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548426-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:02:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116551 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105479 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:09 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/67513] ASAN: Not optimal shadow value check (unlikely condition checked in fast path) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02586.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548433-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:05:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126593 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106208 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:19 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/77703] [6/7 Regression] ICE on assignment to pointer function Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02592.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548435-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:05:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126928 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106484 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:23 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78580] [6/7 Regression] Segfault in gcc with multilib (-m32) and -ffixed-* Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02595.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548428-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:03:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122344 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105785 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:14 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71112] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fpie on aarch64 ILP32 big-endian Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02594.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548439-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:06:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 130786 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108513 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:42 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/70927] avx512dq instructions emitted even with -mavx512vl -mno-avx512dq Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02598.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70927 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548438-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:06:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129666 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107844 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:36 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/71290] [6/7 Regression] Flexible array member is not diagnosed with -pedantic Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02599.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548430-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:04:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124121 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105889 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:15 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/70582] [6/7 regression] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c FAILs Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02593.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70582 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548440-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:06:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 130833 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108422 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:41 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/35514] Gcc shoud generate symbol type for undefined symbol Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02597.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35514 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548434-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:05:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126738 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106410 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:22 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/68939] ICE or wrong code with OpenMP privatization of reference to VLAs Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02596.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68939 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548442-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:07:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3565 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108733 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:44 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66195] Optimize _GLIBCXX_GUARD_TEST_AND_ACQUIRE and _GLIBCXX_GUARD_SET_AND_RELEASE for PowerPC Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02604.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66195 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548437-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:06:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129616 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107992 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:37 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77639] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 1 of tree_vec with 0 elts in unify, at cp/pt.c:19674) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02601.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548441-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:07:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2312 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108837 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:45 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/28628] Not forcing alignment of arrays in structs with -fsection-anchors Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02603.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28628 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548431-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:04:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125729 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106317 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:20 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/64253] IPA inline analysis processes a code transform operation Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02605.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548436-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:05:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128188 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107771 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:35 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/69940] gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-3.c FAILs with Solaris/x86 as Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02602.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69940 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548443-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:07:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4293 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108270 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:40 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78869] [6/7 Regression] Strange __builtin_memcpy optimisations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02600.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548456-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:10:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10527 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111847 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:14 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/69331] FAIL: 20_util/shared_ptr/thread/default_weaktoshared.cc execution test Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02610.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69331 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548458-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:11:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11395 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112003 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:16 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71947] [6 Regression] x ^ y not folded to 0 if x == y by DOM Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02614.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71947 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548447-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6934 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109696 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:54 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78774] [6 Regression] ICE in constexpr string literals and templates Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02612.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548463-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:12:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12234 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112833 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:26 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/70831] [6/7 Regression] FTBFS: Build fails with bootstrap-lto and profiledbootstrap Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, lto X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02616.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70831 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548452-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8645 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111153 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:07 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02608.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548462-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:13:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12196 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112470 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:22 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71691] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Floating point exception) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02618.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548445-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:08:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5782 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108946 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:46 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/77975] [6/7 Regression] Missed optimization for some small constants Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02619.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77975 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548451-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8610 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111268 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:08 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71563] [6/7 Regression] Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer. Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02606.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548457-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:11:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10576 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109848 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:55 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02611.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548432-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:04:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125753 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106372 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:21 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/71907] [6 regression] missing buffer overflow warnings with -flto Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, lto X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02607.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71907 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548454-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:10:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10331 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111611 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:12 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/70019] VLA size overflow not detected Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.4 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02609.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548461-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:12:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12139 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112632 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:23 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/68510] [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1827 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02615.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548460-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:11:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11454 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112097 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:17 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/69639] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02613.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548464-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:13:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12279 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112763 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:25 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/67321] [ARM] Exploit Wide Add operations when appropriate Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: michael.collison at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02617.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67321 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548469-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14472 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 114562 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:41 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77967] ICE in cp_parser_type_name, at cp/parser.c:16419 (trying to add a method to a template alias) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02622.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77967 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548467-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14399 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 114703 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:42 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71342] [6/7 Regression][RL78] set1 / clr1 with !addr16 sometimes doesn't work Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02630.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548471-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15738 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115981 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:55 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/77546] [6/7 regression] C++ software renderer performance drop Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02626.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77546 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548476-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18105 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116473 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:59 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/65452] strcmp (foo, foo) could give a warning Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02631.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65452 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548473-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15962 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116085 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:56 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/66004] [6/7 Regression]: performance of 26_numerics/random/negative_binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02627.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548472-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15912 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115807 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:52 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/71577] [6/7 regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (with extra struct initializer) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1117 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02625.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71577 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548474-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15999 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115590 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:50 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60336] empty struct value is passed differently in C and C++ Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02628.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #47 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548459-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:12:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11421 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112219 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:18 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/66404] gcc.target/i386/pad-10.c etc. FAIL with PIE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02621.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66404 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548468-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14443 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115002 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:45 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78282] [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02623.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548449-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7082 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109540 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:52 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71419] interrupt attribute silently dropped for Thumb code on armv7-a Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02624.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71419 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548475-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16955 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116159 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:56 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/74563] [6/7 regression] Classic MIPS16 (non-MIPS16e) function return broken Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02629.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548466-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:13:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13457 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112965 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:27 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02620.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548482-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20490 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 118335 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:09 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71488] [6 Regression] Wrong code for vector comparisons with ivybridge and westmere targets Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02637.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548479-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19282 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116602 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:00 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/70315] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-17.c scan-tree-dump-times esra Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02634.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548489-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24828 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122672 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:24 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/68128] A huge regression in Parboil v2.5 OpenMP CUTCP test (2.5 times lower performance) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02645.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548485-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21664 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 120406 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:15 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/70390] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in copy_loop_close_phi_args, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2114 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02640.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70390 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548477-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19184 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117201 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:06 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/65430] Missing -Wsequence-point warning with COMPOUND_EXPRs Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02632.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548483-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20698 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119501 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:13 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/70583] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C -std=gnu++98 execution test Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02639.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548480-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19835 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116307 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:58 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/70689] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3564 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02635.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70689 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548488-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23818 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122549 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:23 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71778] [6/7 Regression][ARM] ICE using non-constant argument to Neon intrinsic that requires constant arguments Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02643.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71778 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548486-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22821 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 120920 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:17 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71294] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02641.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548490-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24872 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122867 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:26 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/65846] Optimize data access in PIE with copy reloc Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02644.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65846 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548478-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19236 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117980 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:08 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/70768] [6/7 Regression] Increased compilation time Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02633.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548450-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7138 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109203 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:49 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/66398] g++.dg/abi/anon1.C FAILs with PIE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02636.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66398 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548487-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23619 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119644 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:13 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/71706] [6/7 Regression] [Coarray] ICE on using sync images with integer(kind<>4), with -fcoarray=lib -fcheck=bounds Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02642.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548481-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20439 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119273 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:12 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/77439] [6/7 regression] wrong code for sibcall with longcall, APCS frame and VFP Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02638.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77439 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548502-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30486 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125188 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:51 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77907] [6 Regression] Add "const" to argument of constexpr constructor causes the object to be left in unconstructed state Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02657.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77907 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548495-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26002 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123151 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:28 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78645] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, cxx_eval_call_expression) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02650.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78645 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548498-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29243 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124016 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:36 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/69633] [6/7 Regression] Redundant move is generated after r228097 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02652.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548501-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30441 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125327 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:52 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjLzY1ODkxXSAtV2xvZ2ljYWwtb3Agbm93IHdhcm5zIGFib3V0IGxv?= =?UTF-8?B?Z2ljYWwg4oCYYW5k4oCZIG9mIGVxdWFsIGV4cHJlc3Npb25zIGV2ZW4gd2hl?= =?UTF-8?B?biBkaWZmZXJlbnQgdHlwZXMvc2l6ZW9mcyBhcmUgaW52b2x2ZWQ=?Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02655.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548503-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30545 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125441 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:53 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/68009] [6/7 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with inline matmul Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02658.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548455-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:10:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10476 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111749 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:13 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/67420] gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90 FAILs Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02656.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67420 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548500-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29392 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124973 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:49 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/61551] [NEON] alter costs to allow use of post-indexed addressing modes for VLD{2..4}/VST{2..4} Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02654.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548496-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26050 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123246 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:29 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71016] [6/7 Regression] Redundant sign extension with conditional __builtin_clzl Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02648.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548492-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25557 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122206 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:21 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/69728] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02646.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548493-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25634 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122444 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:22 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77581] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: instantiate_template_1, cp/pt.c:17391 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02647.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77581 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548494-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25951 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123036 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:27 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/70867] [6 regression] access discriminant in return aggregate wrongly detected as dangling Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02649.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70867 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548497-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28115 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124443 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:44 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78856] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02651.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78856 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548499-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29348 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:04:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124825 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:47 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/61225] [5/6/7 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02653.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548511-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 35875 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127334 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:11 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71321] [6/7 Regression] x86: worse code for uint8_t % 10 and / 10 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02669.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71321 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548505-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31787 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126041 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:59 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/72759] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, tree_class_check, ocp_convert) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02660.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72759 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548509-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34672 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126952 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:08 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/70598] Fortran OpenACC host_data construct ICE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cltang at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02664.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548508-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34541 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125569 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:54 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02663.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548514-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 37973 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128103 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:17 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/71570] [6/7 regression] ICE on invalid variable capture in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:551 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02667.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548504-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31727 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126188 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:01 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvNzg2OTNdIFs2LzcgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0gQm9ndXMgJ2luY29u?= =?UTF-8?B?c2lzdGVudCBkZWR1Y3Rpb24gZm9yIOKAmGF1dG/igJknIGVycm9yIHdoZW4g?= =?UTF-8?B?aGF2aW5nIGEgZGVwZW5kZW50IGluaXRpYWxpemVyIGFuZCBhIG5vbmRlcGVu?= =?UTF-8?B?ZGVudCBvbmUgaW4gdGhlIHNhbWUgZGVjbGFyYXRpb24=?Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02661.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548513-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 37939 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127941 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:16 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78518] [6/7 Regression] Warning format regression Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02668.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78518 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31834 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125965 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:59 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71076] [6/7 Regression] error: missing PHI def Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02659.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71076 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548510-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34704 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127164 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:09 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/71638] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu with -Wall (internal compiler error: non-constant element in constant CONSTRUCTOR) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02665.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548491-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24910 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122760 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:25 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/77362] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] ICE in sese_build_liveouts_use w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02666.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548507-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 33451 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126615 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:04 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/69675] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block 42 does not dominate use in block 34) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02662.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548516-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39023 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128419 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:20 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/72813] [6/7 Regression] atomic header cannot be compiled into translation unit with -fkeep-inline-functions Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02670.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548520-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 40987 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129383 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:28 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions? Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02675.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548521-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41046 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129132 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:27 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77347] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect auto deduction failure in template class member function Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02674.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77347 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548517-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39180 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128244 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:18 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78881] New: [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02671.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2858 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 Bug ID: 78881 Summary: [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: janus at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- From https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-visual-fortran-compiler-for-windows/topic/706063: module t_m use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only : iostat_end, iostat_eor, output_unit implicit none private type, public :: t private character(len=:), allocatable :: m_s contains !private procedure, pass(this), private :: read_t generic :: read(formatted) => read_t end type t contains subroutine read_t(this, lun, iotype, vlist, istat, imsg) ! argument definitions class(t), intent(inout) :: this integer, intent(in) :: lun character(len=*), intent(in) :: iotype integer, intent(in) :: vlist(:) integer, intent(out) :: istat character(len=*), intent(inout) :: imsg !.. Local variables character(len=*), parameter :: sfmt = "(*(g0))" character(len=1) :: c integer :: i i = 0 loop_read: do i = i + 1 read( unit=lun, fmt="(a)", iostat=istat, iomsg=imsg ) c select case ( istat ) case ( 0 ) write( output_unit, fmt=sfmt) "i = ", i, ", c = ", c case ( iostat_end ) write( output_unit, fmt=sfmt) "i = ", i, ", istat = iostat_end" exit loop_read case ( iostat_eor ) write( output_unit, fmt=sfmt) "i = ", i, ", istat = iostat_eor" exit loop_read case default write( output_unit, fmt=sfmt) "i = ", i, ", istat = ", istat exit loop_read end select end do loop_read return end subroutine read_t end module t_m program p use t_m, only : t implicit none character(len=:), allocatable :: s type(t) :: foo character(len=256) :: imsg integer :: istat s = "Hello" read( unit=s, fmt=*, iostat=istat, iomsg=imsg ) foo if ( istat /= 0 ) then print *, "istat = ", istat print *, imsg end if stop end program p After compiling this with current trunk, the runtime output is: i = 1, c = e i = 2, c = l i = 3, c = l i = 4, c = o i = 5, istat = iostat_end istat = -1 End of file It seems like the first character is being swallowed somewhere ... >From gcc-bugs-return-548518-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39508 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127829 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:15 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71109] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02672.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71109 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548515-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39000 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128319 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:19 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/49857] Put constant switch-tables into flash Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: addr-space, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02677.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548465-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:13:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13418 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113532 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:33 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66171] [6/7 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/biap.c Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02678.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66171 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548526-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43103 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129812 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:32 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/67412] gfortran.dg/execute_command_line_2.f90 FAILs on Solaris 10 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ro at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02681.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548519-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39936 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128564 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:21 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02673.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548524-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43034 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129048 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:26 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/66089] [6/7 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02680.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548522-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41094 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129541 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:30 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/72752] [6 Regression] ICE: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1183 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02676.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548525-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43061 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128667 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:22 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/66399] g++.dg/abi/anon4.C FAILs with PIE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02679.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66399 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548532-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47144 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1735 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:47 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/71121] [6 Regression] Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will never be NULL [-Waddress]" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02687.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548527-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43996 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 130878 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:42 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/71602] [6 regression] ICE on __builtin_va_arg in build_va_arg, at c-family/c-common.c:5810 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02682.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548528-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44038 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1387 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:46 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02683.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548448-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7013 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109501 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:51 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6/7 Regression] From 26/7 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02684.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548531-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 46009 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2166 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:51 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/78027] [6/7 Regression] ICE in new_oacc_loop_routine, at omp-low.c:19000 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cesar at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02686.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548530-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 45131 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1970 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:49 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66207] Switch alpha to LRA Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02685.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548533-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48462 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4018 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:57 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/68065] Size calculations for VLAs can overflow Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02688.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548534-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50589 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4478 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:01 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/70703] [6/7 regression] Regression in register usage on x86 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02689.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70703 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548446-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6864 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109379 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:50 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/68749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true changes made" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02692.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548484-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:15:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21629 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119981 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:58:14 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71144] [6/7 Regression] isl_aff.c:1001: position out of bounds Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02699.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71144 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548538-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57737 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6356 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:41 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/70621] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02693.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548453-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:09:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8718 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109925 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:56 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78572] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02701.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548539-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58831 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6432 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:42 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71518] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02694.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548470-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:14:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14515 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 114835 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:57:43 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66960] Add interrupt attribute to x86 backend Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02697.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548535-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50646 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4707 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:03 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/77371] [6/7 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cltang at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02690.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548536-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 51739 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5758 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:21 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/68649] [6/7 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02691.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548529-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 45105 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1812 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:48 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/65024] [OOP] unlimited polymorphic pointer structure not built when it should be Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: FIXME X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02700.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548523-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:17:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42050 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129733 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:31 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/68733] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02696.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548444-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:08:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5652 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108611 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:56:43 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/67352] [avr] incorrect warning with -Waddr-space-convert and array in struct in __flash Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: addr-space, diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02695.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67352 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548512-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:16:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 36964 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127707 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 10:59:14 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/39589] make -Wmissing-field-initializers=2 work with "designated initializers" ? Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02698.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548542-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61028 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6652 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:47 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/70588] SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02702.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548543-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62181 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7126 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:50 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/71654] [6 Regression] missing VRP optimization on c++ unsigned char and short expressions Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02703.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548540-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59756 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6523 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:44 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78343] [6 Regression] Loop is not eliminated Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02707.txt.bz2 Content-length: 411 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548541-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59775 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:09:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6599 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:46 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/68887] [6/7 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02705.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548537-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:18:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 54634 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6276 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:00:39 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/77959] ICE in ix86_decompose_address, at i386/i386.c:14954 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02706.txt.bz2 Content-length: 412 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77959 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. >From gcc-bugs-return-548545-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:19:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48458 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:18:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59007 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:53 -0000 From: "lcid-fire at gmx dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78882] New: std::bind not working with templated function Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: lcid-fire at gmx dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02704.txt.bz2 Content-length: 932 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78882 Bug ID: 78882 Summary: std::bind not working with templated function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lcid-fire at gmx dot net Target Milestone: --- The following does not compile on GCC up to 7 while working fine in clang and icc: #include #include struct Bar { template T* bar(const char*) { return nullptr; } }; struct In { }; template auto anonymousWrap(Bar& bar, std::string const& name, const char* other) { auto res = bar.bar(name.c_str()); return res; }; int main() { using namespace std::placeholders; std::bind(anonymousWrap, _1, _2, "other"); return 0; } >From gcc-bugs-return-548546-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:19:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 51619 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111407 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:13:25 -0000 From: "lcid-fire at gmx dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78882] std::bind not working with templated function Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: lcid-fire at gmx dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02708.txt.bz2 Content-length: 397 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78882 --- Comment #1 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net --- Flags are -std=c++14 and the actual problem seems to be templates combined with auto: #include struct In { }; template auto anonymousWrap() { return T(); }; int main() { using namespace std::placeholders; std::bind(anonymousWrap); return 0; } >From gcc-bugs-return-548544-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:19:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48438 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:18:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59038 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:08:53 -0000 From: "venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02709.txt.bz2 Content-length: 499 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #12 from Venkataramanan --- (In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #11) > Btw, did you benchmark store splitting on AMD? It is also enabled for BDVER > and ZNVER1. I have not done that. As per SWOG for AMD15h (BDVER) it is advisable to split 256 bit stores. Also there is a old bug report which says splitting of store is better. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49089 >From gcc-bugs-return-548547-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:25:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 80129 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:25:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79794 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:25:10 -0000 From: "simon at pushface dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/78845] Inverse (Real_Matrix) result has wrong bounds Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: simon at pushface dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02710.txt.bz2 Content-length: 542 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78845 simon at pushface dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #40356|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org --- Created attachment 40386 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40386&action=edit Reproducer (update 1) Added check for Ada.Numerics.Complex_Arrays. >From gcc-bugs-return-548548-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:25:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81113 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:25:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81011 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:25:39 -0000 From: "simon at pushface dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/78845] Inverse (Real_Matrix) result has wrong bounds Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: simon at pushface dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02711.txt.bz2 Content-length: 151 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78845 --- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org --- Same problem with Ada.Numerics.Complex_Arrays. >From gcc-bugs-return-548549-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:48:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10158 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:48:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10041 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:48:43 -0000 From: "dhowells at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dhowells at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02712.txt.bz2 Content-length: 489 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #21 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #20) > *** Bug 78879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Kernel bug or not, it should be noted that this means that you cannot use gcc from r236831 to compile any kernel from the introduction and use of ilog2() to the current day - and these kernel versions cannot be retroactively fixed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548550-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 11:59:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 75279 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 11:59:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 75087 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 11:59:34 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02713.txt.bz2 Content-length: 622 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to dhowells@redhat.com from comment #21) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #20) > > *** Bug 78879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > > Kernel bug or not, it should be noted that this means that you cannot use > gcc from r236831 to compile any kernel from the introduction and use of > ilog2() to the current day - and these kernel versions cannot be > retroactively fixed. No. I build allmodconfig kernels regularly with gcc trunk and it works fine. >From gcc-bugs-return-548551-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 12:01:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85512 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 12:01:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85332 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 12:01:13 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02714.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1382 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- It seems that this problem not only appears when reading from internal units, but also from std input: module t_m implicit none type, public :: t character(len=:), allocatable :: m_s contains procedure, pass(this) :: read_t generic :: read(formatted) => read_t end type contains subroutine read_t(this, lun, iotype, vlist, istat, imsg) ! argument definitions class(t), intent(inout) :: this integer, intent(in) :: lun character(len=*), intent(in) :: iotype integer, intent(in) :: vlist(:) integer, intent(out) :: istat character(len=*), intent(inout) :: imsg ! local variables character :: c integer :: i do i=1,5 read( unit=lun, fmt="(a1)", iostat=istat, iomsg=imsg ) c select case ( istat ) case ( 0 ) write( *, *) "i = ", i, ", c = ", c case default write( *, *) "i = ", i, ", istat = ", istat, imsg return end select end do end subroutine end module program p use t_m implicit none ! character(len=5) :: s = "Hello" type(t) :: foo read( unit=*, fmt=*) foo end >From gcc-bugs-return-548552-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 12:05:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103121 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 12:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102948 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 12:05:21 -0000 From: "linux at carewolf dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linux at carewolf dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02715.txt.bz2 Content-length: 362 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #13 from Allan Jensen --- The question is if the unaligned store is still slow on Excavator and Ryzen which support AVX2. As far as I understand the bulldozer architectures just prefer split AVX because it was basically emulating them with 128-bit micro-ops anyway. >From gcc-bugs-return-548553-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 12:40:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7953 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 12:40:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7837 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 12:40:41 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02716.txt.bz2 Content-length: 578 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40387 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40387&action=edit gcc7-pr78866.patch Untested fix. >From gcc-bugs-return-548554-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 12:50:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21682 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 12:50:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21496 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 12:50:18 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/77905] [5/6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in ipa_comdats, at ipa-comdats.c:352) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02717.txt.bz2 Content-length: 772 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77905 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 12:49:44 2016 New Revision: 243850 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243850&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-12-13 Jakub Jelinek PR ipa/77905 * ipa-pure-const.c (cdtor_p): Return true for DECL_STATIC_{CON,DE}STRUCTOR even when it is DECL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_P. * g++.dg/ipa/pr77905.C: New test. Added: branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr77905.C Modified: branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548555-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 12:52:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27221 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 12:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27076 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 12:52:37 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02718.txt.bz2 Content-length: 676 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 12:52:06 2016 New Revision: 243851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243851&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/77767 * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If *expr is non-NULL, append expression to *expr instead of overwriting it. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr77767.c: New test. Added: branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr77767.c Modified: branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/c/ChangeLog branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/c/c-decl.c branches/gcc-6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548556-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 12:57:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 78107 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 12:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59170 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 12:57:24 -0000 From: "coolypf at qq dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: coolypf at qq dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02719.txt.bz2 Content-length: 859 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #5 from Yuan Pengfei --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #2) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > > See discussion in PR72785. > > > > I am using GCC 6.2.1. Is it the same problem? > > Yes, I think so. The compiler is under no obligation to optimize the > ____ilog2_NaN call away. It looks like a kernel bug. I don't think so. In this case, the value of sector_size is constant (256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096) and the ____ilog2_NaN call can be optimized away. It is after enabling the -fprofile-generate option when the compiler thinks the ____ilog2_NaN call can not be optimized away. Reference source code: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/scsi/sd.c?v=3.10#L2163 >From gcc-bugs-return-548557-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:05:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108517 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101574 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:05:11 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02720.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1124 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #5) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > > (In reply to Yuan Pengfei from comment #2) > > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > > > See discussion in PR72785. > > > > > > I am using GCC 6.2.1. Is it the same problem? > > > > Yes, I think so. The compiler is under no obligation to optimize the > > ____ilog2_NaN call away. It looks like a kernel bug. > > I don't think so. In this case, the value of sector_size is constant (256, > 512, 1024, 2048, 4096) and the ____ilog2_NaN call can be optimized away. > > It is after enabling the -fprofile-generate option when the compiler thinks > the ____ilog2_NaN call can not be optimized away. > > Reference source code: > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/scsi/sd.c?v=3.10#L2163 Yes, sorry I got that the wrong way round. The compiler is under no obligation not to duplicate (optimize) and thereby produce that ____ilog2_NaN undefined symbol. >From gcc-bugs-return-548558-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:10:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129969 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129801 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 13:09:47 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/71444] Error constants for MinGW-w64 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02721.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1627 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 21 13:09:13 2016 New Revision: 243853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243853&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 71444 define more error constants for mingw-w64 PR libstdc++/71444 * config/os/mingw32-w64/error_constants.h (address_family_not_supported, address_in_use, address_not_available) (already_connected, connection_aborted, connection_already_in_progress) connection_refused, connection_reset, cross_device_link) (destination_address_required, host_unreachable, message_size) (network_down, network_reset, network_unreachable, no_buffer_space) (no_protocol_option, not_a_socket, not_connected, operation_canceled) (operation_in_progress, operation_not_supported, protocol_error) (protocol_not_supported, too_many_links, too_many_symbolic_link_levels) (value_too_large, wrong_protocol_type): Define. (bad_message, identifier_removed, no_link, no_message_available) (no_message, no_stream_resources, not_a_stream, owner_dead) (state_not_recoverable, stream_timeout, text_file_busy): Define conditionally. * testsuite/19_diagnostics/headers/system_error/errc_std_c++0x.cc: Guard test for no_message with _GLIBCXX_HAVE_ENOMSG. Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/config/os/mingw32-w64/error_constants.h trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/headers/system_error/errc_std_c++0x.cc >From gcc-bugs-return-548559-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:13:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4383 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4279 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:13:15 -0000 From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78883] New: [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02722.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2674 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 Bug ID: 78883 Summary: [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- r243578 triggers several ICEs in avr-gcc test suite; amongst them: $ avr-gcc /gnu/gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr26833.c -S -O1 -mmcu=avr4 -S -da /gnu/gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr26833.c: In function 'yasm_lc3b__parse_insn': /gnu/gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr26833.c:19:1: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: } ^ (jump_insn 58 98 59 9 (set (pc) (if_then_else (eq (and:HI (reg:HI 31 r31) (const_int 1 [0x1])) (const_int 0 [0])) (label_ref 70) (pc))) "/gnu/gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr26833.c":11 415 {*sbrx_and_branchhi} (int_list:REG_BR_PROB 375 (nil)) -> 70) /gnu/gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr26833.c:19:1: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 0x9840e3 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*) ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/rtl-error.c:108 0x98410f _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*) ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/rtl-error.c:119 0x95b61d extract_constrain_insn(rtx_insn*) ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/recog.c:2213 0x939b45 reload_cse_simplify_operands ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/postreload.c:391 0x93a725 reload_cse_simplify ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/postreload.c:179 0x93a725 reload_cse_regs_1 ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/postreload.c:218 0x93c3ab reload_cse_regs ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/postreload.c:64 0x93c3ab execute ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/postreload.c:2342 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions. georg@pandora:~/test> R31 is the last hard reg (8-bit) and must never be allocated to HImode. GCC configured as: $ ../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/configure --target=avr --prefix=/local/gnu/install/gcc-7 --disable-shared --disable-nls --with-dwarf2 --enable-target-optspace=yes --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++ >From gcc-bugs-return-548560-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:15:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20094 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19973 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:15:45 -0000 From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78884] New: ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02723.txt.bz2 Content-length: 773 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Bug ID: 78884 Summary: ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Noticed this ICE when looking at OpenMP gimplification/lowering: void use(int*); void f(int n) { #pragma omp simd for (int i=0; i<1024; i++) { int t[n]; use(t); } } $ gcc/cc1 -fopenmp t.c will ICE (segfault) in omp_add_variable() due to NULL DECL_VALUE_EXPR on 't'. >From gcc-bugs-return-548561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:18:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25203 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25131 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:18:34 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/71444] Error constants for MinGW-w64 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02724.txt.bz2 Content-length: 255 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on gcc trunk. Assuming no problems show up this is suitable for backporting to the branches, so I'll leave the bug open for now. >From gcc-bugs-return-548562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:19:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29833 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29530 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:19:31 -0000 From: "pawel_sikora at zoho dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/77963] inconsistent (false?) leaks detection. Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pawel_sikora at zoho dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02725.txt.bz2 Content-length: 895 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77963 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1) > lsan does not work with ptrace. > There is https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/728 for it. > We don't have plans to fix it, but the change I sent for review yesterday > causes lsan to complain loudly instead of producing false reports. this change clarify the situation with shiny message but doesn't help to much in the real development scenario. under gdb/strace session the process will terminate with exit code 1 and may breaks application flow due to unexpected exit code of the child process. in such case i need to setup manually for debug session the ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 to workaround the lsan die(). it would be better to omit the die() in such case (no ptrace-available). >From gcc-bugs-return-548563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:24:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 49174 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48916 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:24:43 -0000 From: "venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02726.txt.bz2 Content-length: 489 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #14 from Venkataramanan --- (In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #13) > The question is if the unaligned store is still slow on Excavator and Ryzen > which support AVX2. As far as I understand the bulldozer architectures just > prefer split AVX because it was basically emulating them with 128-bit > micro-ops anyway. I have to benchmark and then comeback on store splitting. >From gcc-bugs-return-548564-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:27:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96113 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:27:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 95841 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:27:45 -0000 From: "venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78762] Regression: Splitting unaligned AVX loads also when AVX2 is enabled Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02727.txt.bz2 Content-length: 241 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762 --- Comment #15 from Venkataramanan --- Considering this PR, removing the tuning (splitting of unaligned avx256 loads) for generic is suggested. >From gcc-bugs-return-548565-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:31:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103589 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103153 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:30:49 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78826] jump bypasses non-POD Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02728.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2276 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78826 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Krzysztof Laskowski from comment #3) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > > I assume GCC 4.5 stopped diagnosing it due to the revised specification > > which only cares about trivial constructor or trivial destructor, not > > PODness. > I couldn't actually find any clause allowing jump over trivially constructed > variable in ISO/IEC 14882:1998 nor ISO/IEC 14882:2003. Moreover, icc (13, > 16, 17) and clang (3.0-3.9) warn and err, respectively, on example. I didn't suggest you'd find it in C++03. > It seems to correlate with introducing c++0x support in gcc. Yes, obviously. Because the refined rule was introduced for C++11. That's what I meant by revised specification. > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html > "Diagnostics that used to complain about passing non-POD types to ... or > jumping past the declaration of a non-POD variable now check for triviality > rather than PODness, as per C++0x." So it's even documented as being deliberate, isn't that clear? > > Giving a diagnostic here would just be pedantic and unhelpful. > I agree it's harmless to bypass trivially constructed variable. Does it mean > that it's a deliberate deviation from standard for the sake of ease of c++11 > implementation at the cost of portability/conformance? No, not for the ease of implementation. For the benefit of users. I repeat: Giving a diagnostic here would just be pedantic and unhelpful. The old rule doesn't prevent bugs, it doesn't make code faster, it has no advantages. The only reason the C++03 rule was in terms of POD was because we didn't have a better property to use. What matters is whether non-trivial initialization or destruction gets bypassed, and with modern C++ we are able to express the rule more precisely. Jason, do you see any advantage to making this a pedwarn for -std=c++98, or should we just close as WONTFIX? >From gcc-bugs-return-548566-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:50:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121451 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121334 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 13:50:43 -0000 From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02729.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1257 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Dec 21 13:50:11 2016 New Revision: 243854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243854&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR testsuite/52641 * gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-16.c (ia0, ia1, ia9): Handle case where neither short nor int has a size of 4; use long. * gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-17.c: Same. * gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-1.c (test2) : Use int32_t for components as 4 components are supposed to occupy 16 bytes. * gcc.dg/pr78408-1.c: Require target size32plus. * gcc.dg/pr78408-2.c: Same. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr78428.c. Require target int32plus. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailcall-7.c: Require target trampolines. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-16.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-17.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78408-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78408-2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr78428.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailcall-7.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548567-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 13:51:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122281 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 13:51:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121450 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 13:50:58 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02730.txt.bz2 Content-length: 561 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- There's no need to determine the addresses, only the truth of the inequality. The standard says distinct functions have distinct addresses. Yes, linker trickery can break that, but it's reasonable to rely on it because it's guaranteed by the standard. Code that cares about addresses of functions (typically when registering callbacks) is unlikely to care about comparing addresses of builtins or functions in libgcc, only for user code. >From gcc-bugs-return-548569-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:06:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42534 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17649 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:06:15 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78882] std::bind not working with templated function Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status version resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02732.txt.bz2 Content-length: 868 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78882 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unknown |6.3.0 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This isn't a problem with std::bind, but converting a function template into a pointer: template void bind(F) { } template auto anonymousWrap() { return T(); }; int main() { bind(anonymousWrap); } This is a dup of Bug 64194 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64194 *** >From gcc-bugs-return-548568-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:06:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41479 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18396 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:06:16 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02731.txt.bz2 Content-length: 441 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lcid-fire at gmx dot net --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 78882 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >From gcc-bugs-return-548570-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:10:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 130586 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:10:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105393 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:10:24 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78843] error: 'functionname' was not declared in this scope Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02733.txt.bz2 Content-length: 518 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > are different identifiers, C/C++ is case sensitive. >From gcc-bugs-return-548571-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:12:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127635 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:12:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113551 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:12:02 -0000 From: "lcid-fire at gmx dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:12:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: lcid-fire at gmx dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02734.txt.bz2 Content-length: 138 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net --- Shouldn't the status be confirmed? >From gcc-bugs-return-548572-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:15:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107294 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 65957 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:15:25 -0000 From: "vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78883] [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02735.txt.bz2 Content-length: 162 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- Can you please attach a combine dump? >From gcc-bugs-return-548573-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:20:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57278 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57119 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 14:20:49 -0000 From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78831] [nvptx] -mgomp -Os init_softstack_frame ICE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02736.txt.bz2 Content-length: 549 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78831 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov --- Author: amonakov Date: Wed Dec 21 14:20:09 2016 New Revision: 243855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243855&root=gcc&view=rev Log: nvptx: do not assume that crtl->is_leaf is unset PR target/78831 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (init_softstack_frame): Remove assert. Compute crtl->is_leaf only if unset. Adjust comment. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548574-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:21:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58760 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58556 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:21:41 -0000 From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78831] [nvptx] -mgomp -Os init_softstack_frame ICE Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02737.txt.bz2 Content-length: 437 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78831 Alexander Monakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- Fixed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548575-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:22:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59851 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59706 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:22:17 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02738.txt.bz2 Content-length: 255 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It is confirmed, and has been since 2014-12-08. If you look at the dropdown you'll see there is no CONFIRMED status in GCC's bugzilla. >From gcc-bugs-return-548576-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:23:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62986 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:23:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62744 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:23:18 -0000 From: "m.gcc.gnu.org at alias dot viem.se" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78807] Loop optimization trigger bus error Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: m.gcc.gnu.org at alias dot viem.se X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02739.txt.bz2 Content-length: 462 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78807 --- Comment #3 from Mauritz Sundell --- I did not have access to a Solaris/sparc machine with GCC 6. But on Linux/sparc test program do not crash compiled with GCC 6.2.0. $ uname -a Linux xxx 4.1.12-80.el6uek.sparc64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 30 03:09:10 PST 2016 sparc64 sparc64 sparc64 GNU/Linux $ bin/gcc-6.2.0/bin/gcc -m64 -O3 -fPIC -o bug78807 bug78807.c $ ./bug78807 $ >From gcc-bugs-return-548577-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:32:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104006 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103906 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:32:27 -0000 From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78885] New: gcac checking too slow to be useful ? Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02740.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1268 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78885 Bug ID: 78885 Summary: gcac checking too slow to be useful ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I just tried out a plain non-bootstrap build of gcc trunk using --enable-checking=gcac. Configure line was ../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.243837 \ --disable-bootstrap \ --disable-multilib \ --disable-werror \ --enable-checking=gcac \ --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran In the build, some compilations took over an hour on a 4GHZ AMD machine. Using ulimit -t 3600 meant the build would not complete. I checked how many times gcac gets mentioned in this bug database. To my surprise, only two mentions, so the gcac checking isn't helping to find bugs very much. Suggest rework gcac checking option to be fast enough to be usable. Splitting gcac into a fast checker that doesn't check much and a full-fat checker that does as much as the current version might be the way forward. >From gcc-bugs-return-548578-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:37:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126028 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125961 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:37:36 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78885] gcac checking too slow to be useful ? Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02741.txt.bz2 Content-length: 363 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78885 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Gcac is always collect when ggc_collect is called so yes it will be slow as gc collecting is slow due to having to mark and sweep over huge amounts of memory and there are many calls to ggc_collect now. Each new pass gets one new call. >From gcc-bugs-return-548579-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:54:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94691 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:54:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94624 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:54:14 -0000 From: "jhasse at bixense dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jhasse at bixense dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02742.txt.bz2 Content-length: 725 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #4 from Jan Niklas Hasse --- > Great! Please read https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/appendix_contributing.html especially the part about legal paperwork. Do you mean the part about legal paperwork in https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html ? > No. Just look at the existing code and figure out what the equivalent code would be for Windows, and write an alternative implementation e.g. replace calls to POSIX stat() with whatever Windows uses to query file properties, and replace calls to POSIX chmod with whatever Windows uses to change file permissions. And can I look at how boost::filesystem does this? >From gcc-bugs-return-548580-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:58:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100344 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100224 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:58:37 -0000 From: "prekgeo at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78886] New: gcc Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: prekgeo at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02743.txt.bz2 Content-length: 3856 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Bug ID: 78886 Summary: gcc Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: prekgeo at yahoo dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40388 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40388&action=edit test case $ ./configure --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c --prefix=/home/prekas/gcc $ uname -a Linux sciicebpc1 4.4.0-38-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 6 15:42:33 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ ../gcc/bin/gcc -v -save-temps -S -O2 gcc_bug.c Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=../gcc/bin/gcc Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ./configure --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c Thread model: posix gcc version 6.3.0 (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-S' '-O2' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /home/prekas/gcc/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/cc1 -E -quiet -v -imultiarch x86_64-linux-gnu -iprefix /home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/ gcc_bug.c -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -O2 -fpch-preprocess -o gcc_bug.i ignoring nonexistent directory "/home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include" ignoring duplicate directory "/home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/include" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include/x86_64-linux-gnu" ignoring duplicate directory "/home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/include-fixed" ignoring nonexistent directory "/home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include" #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: /home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/include /home/prekas/gcc/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/include-fixed /usr/local/include /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu /usr/include End of search list. COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-S' '-O2' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /home/prekas/gcc/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.0/cc1 -fpreprocessed gcc_bug.i -quiet -dumpbase gcc_bug.c -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase gcc_bug -O2 -version -o gcc_bug.s GNU C11 (GCC) version 6.3.0 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 6.3.0, GMP version 6.1.0, MPFR version 3.1.4, MPC version 1.0.3, isl version none GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 GNU C11 (GCC) version 6.3.0 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 6.3.0, GMP version 6.1.0, MPFR version 3.1.4, MPC version 1.0.3, isl version none GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 Compiler executable checksum: aac98bc8a6db7b45e88f65faa8c8f64b gcc_bug.c: In function 'foo': gcc_bug.c:3:6: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault void foo(void) ^~~ 0x9c5cdf crash_signal ../.././gcc/toplev.c:333 0xb131f1 get_stridx ../.././gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c:195 0xb14e8e handle_builtin_malloc ../.././gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c:1837 0xb14e8e strlen_optimize_stmt ../.././gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c:2156 0xb14e8e strlen_dom_walker::before_dom_children(basic_block_def*) ../.././gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c:2339 0xf4ace2 dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*) ../.././gcc/domwalk.c:265 0xb12b0f execute ../.././gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c:2411 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions. >From gcc-bugs-return-548581-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:59:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101281 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:59:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101193 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:59:16 -0000 From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78883] [avr] ICE triggered by change to combine.c (r243578) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02744.txt.bz2 Content-length: 377 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 40389 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40389&action=edit .combine dump as requested. Genrated with $ avr-gcc pr26833.c -S -O1 -mmcu=avr4 -S -fdump-rtl-combine-details FYI, the error goes away with -Os or -O2. >From gcc-bugs-return-548582-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 14:59:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101701 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 14:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101229 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 14:59:18 -0000 From: "prekgeo at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78886] gcc Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: prekgeo at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02745.txt.bz2 Content-length: 241 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 --- Comment #1 from George Prekas --- Created attachment 40390 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40390&action=edit the preprocessed file >From gcc-bugs-return-548583-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:02:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129648 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:02:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128364 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:02:13 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/78877] Missing suggestion for -fsanitize­dres Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: driver X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02746.txt.bz2 Content-length: 519 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877 --- Comment #1 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- There's very similar one seen by Jakub in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01765.html $ ./xgcc -B. -fsanitize=nul /tmp/a.c xgcc: error: unrecognized argument to -fsanitize= option: ‘nul’ $ ./xgcc -B. -fsanitiz=nul /tmp/a.c xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fsanitiz=nul’; did you mean ‘-fsanitize=null’? >From gcc-bugs-return-548584-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:05:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32649 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:05:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15395 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 15:05:43 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/78863] [6/7 Regression] error on -fsanitize suggests invalid -fsanitize=all Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: driver X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02747.txt.bz2 Content-length: 683 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78863 --- Comment #4 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Dec 21 15:05:10 2016 New Revision: 243857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243857&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not suggest -fsanitize=all (PR driver/78863). PR driver/78863 * gcc.c (driver::build_option_suggestions): Do not add -fsanitize=all as a suggestion candidate. PR driver/78863 * gcc.dg/spellcheck-options-13.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/spellcheck-options-13.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/gcc.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548585-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:06:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 37357 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 37225 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:06:38 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/78863] [6 Regression] error on -fsanitize suggests invalid -fsanitize=all Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: driver X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02748.txt.bz2 Content-length: 554 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78863 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[6/7 Regression] error on |[6 Regression] error on |-fsanitize suggests invalid |-fsanitize suggests invalid |-fsanitize=all |-fsanitize=all --- Comment #5 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Fixed on trunk so far. >From gcc-bugs-return-548586-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:11:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 74582 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 74474 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:11:26 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78884] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc cf_known_to_work short_desc everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02749.txt.bz2 Content-length: 900 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-12-21 CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work| |4.8.5 Summary|ICE when gimplifying VLA in |[5/6/7 Regression] ICE when |OpenMP SIMD region |gimplifying VLA in OpenMP | |SIMD region Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail| |4.9.4, 5.4.0, 6.3.0 --- Comment #1 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Confirmed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548587-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:13:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 83320 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 78943 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:13:30 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02750.txt.bz2 Content-length: 590 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Confirmed, started with GCC 5. >From gcc-bugs-return-548588-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:19:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110438 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:19:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 110306 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:19:15 -0000 From: "amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78884] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02751.txt.bz2 Content-length: 293 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov --- Not sure how well this qualifies as a regression: prior to 4.9, there was no OpenMP SIMD support, so 4.8 just diagnoses a warning for an unrecognized omp-simd pragma. >From gcc-bugs-return-548589-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:21:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115928 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115643 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:21:28 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02752.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1080 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Following patch fixes that: diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c index 67075f07e29..4a05725ca7c 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c @@ -1869,6 +1869,9 @@ handle_builtin_malloc (enum built_in_function bcode, gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi) { gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (*gsi); tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt); + if (lhs == NULL_TREE) + return; + gcc_assert (get_stridx (lhs) == 0); int idx = new_stridx (lhs); tree length = NULL_TREE; If Mark Glisse, the author of the handle_builtin_malloc function, is fine, I'll test that. >From gcc-bugs-return-548591-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:23:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117508 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:23:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117378 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:23:21 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78884] ICE when gimplifying VLA in OpenMP SIMD region Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02754.txt.bz2 Content-length: 540 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78884 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE when |ICE when gimplifying VLA in |gimplifying VLA in OpenMP |OpenMP SIMD region |SIMD region | --- Comment #3 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Ok, dropping regression prefix. >From gcc-bugs-return-548590-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:23:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117500 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:23:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117439 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:23:25 -0000 From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78887] New: [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02753.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1200 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 Bug ID: 78887 Summary: [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Building an allmodconfig 4.9 kernel for arm64 fails with current trunk (make ARCH=arm64 allmodconfig) The error is: FATAL: arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce: sizeof(struct cpu_device_id)=2 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_cpu___device_table=1. Fix definition of struct cpu_device_id in mod_devicetable.h make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/crypto/sha1-ce.o] Error 1 Some kind of assert is triggering in one of the kernel build scripts. The build succeeds with GCC 6. Looks like the compiler renamed some asan-related symbols from: '_GLOBAL__sub_D_65535_0_sha1_ce_glue.c' to '_GLOBAL__sub_D_65535_0___odr_asan.__mod_cpu__cpu_feature_match_SHA1_device_table' Not sure if this is a duplicate of 78513 >From gcc-bugs-return-548592-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:24:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119892 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119233 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:24:15 -0000 From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78887] [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cf_known_to_work target_milestone cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02755.txt.bz2 Content-length: 452 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |aarch64-linux-gnu Known to work| |6.2.1 Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Known to fail| |7.0 >From gcc-bugs-return-548593-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:42:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 55663 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:42:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 55495 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:42:05 -0000 From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02756.txt.bz2 Content-length: 309 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- The return value of malloc is ignored? Your patch looks ok to me, thanks. If it is convenient, you might want to remove the statement, otherwise I expect another pass will handle it later. >From gcc-bugs-return-548594-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 15:59:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17646 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 15:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17366 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 15:59:35 -0000 From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/70936] Hard-coded C++ header paths and relocation problem Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: driver X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cf_reconfirmed_on cc short_desc cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02757.txt.bz2 Content-length: 820 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70936 David Edelsohn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|i686-w64-mingw32 | Last reconfirmed|2016-05-27 00:00:00 |2016-12-21 CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|Hard-coded C++ header paths |Hard-coded C++ header paths |and relocation problem on |and relocation problem |Windows | Known to fail| |6.3.0 --- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn --- Dakon: Reconfirmed with 6.3. Not x86 dependent. Not Windows or mingw dependent. >From gcc-bugs-return-548595-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:01:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23846 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:01:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23735 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:01:32 -0000 From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/78875] -fstack-protector on powerpc64 now always use TLS, won't work for kernel/firmware Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02758.txt.bz2 Content-length: 626 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78875 David Edelsohn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-12-21 CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org, | |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn --- Confirmed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548596-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:04:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31075 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30941 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:04:09 -0000 From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/78880] [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02759.txt.bz2 Content-length: 444 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880 David Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Posting revision number as r243196 so BZ will linkify it. >From gcc-bugs-return-548597-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:14:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93400 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 93250 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:14:04 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02760.txt.bz2 Content-length: 731 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan Niklas Hasse from comment #4) > Do you mean the part about legal paperwork in > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html ? Yes. > And can I look at how boost::filesystem does this? You can't copy any code, that would be a copyright violation. It's OK to see which Windows API functions Boost uses for a particular filesystem operation, but if you're not sure what is covered by copyright law then it's safer not to use another project at all. I was hoping that somebody who actually knows the Windows API would contribute the code, so they already know what the appropriate functions are. >From gcc-bugs-return-548598-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:15:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97465 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96156 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:14:58 -0000 From: "andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/76731] [AVX512] _mm512_i32gather_epi32 and other scatter/gather routines have incorrect signature Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02761.txt.bz2 Content-length: 924 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731 Andrew Senkevich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot co | |m --- Comment #8 from Andrew Senkevich --- (In reply to UroÅ¡ Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > Kyrill/Uros, is this something we should change? > > Any comments on the #c1 questions? > > Someone from Intel (HJ CC'd) will have to clarify the issue first. Hi, the issue take place, and it is hard to say about its history. I think we should follow here declarations from icc headers to be compatible with it. We will work on update SDM accordingly. >From gcc-bugs-return-548599-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:17:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106050 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105927 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 16:16:52 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02762.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1081 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 16:16:20 2016 New Revision: 243860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243860&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/78866 * openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses): Diagnose assumed size arrays in OpenMP map, to and from clauses. * trans-openmp.c: Include diagnostic-core.h, temporarily redefining GCC_DIAG_STYLE to __gcc_tdiag__. (gfc_omp_finish_clause): Diagnose implicitly mapped assumed size arrays. * gfortran.dg/gomp/map-1.f90: Add expected error. * gfortran.dg/gomp/pr78866-1.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/gomp/pr78866-2.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/pr78866-1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/pr78866-2.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/openmp.c trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/map-1.f90 >From gcc-bugs-return-548600-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:22:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8779 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8662 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:22:31 -0000 From: "jhasse at bixense dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jhasse at bixense dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02763.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1020 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #6 from Jan Niklas Hasse --- > Yes. Okay thanks, I'll look into it. > You can't copy any code, that would be a copyright violation. It's OK to see > which Windows API functions Boost uses for a particular filesystem > operation, but if you're not sure what is covered by copyright law then it's > safer not to use another project at all. According to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html the Boost License is GPL compatible. So when I mark the code I copied with the source, it should work, shouldn't it? > I was hoping that somebody who actually knows the Windows API would > contribute the code, so they already know what the appropriate functions are. I know the Windows API, but the details are hard to get right. Especially getting everything to be bug-free. Many man hours have already been spend on boost::filesystem and the API is similar to std::filesystem. Why should I re-invent the wheel? >From gcc-bugs-return-548601-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:46:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105836 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105613 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 16:46:08 -0000 From: "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/71321] [6/7 Regression] x86: worse code for uint8_t % 10 and / 10 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02764.txt.bz2 Content-length: 720 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71321 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Wed Dec 21 16:45:33 2016 New Revision: 243861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243861&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71321 * config/i386/i386.md (lea_general_2b, lea_general_3b): New patterns. * config/i386/predicates.md (const123_operand): New. PR target/71321 * gcc.target/i386/pr71321.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr71321.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md trunk/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548602-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:52:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34773 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34555 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:52:15 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02765.txt.bz2 Content-length: 997 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan Niklas Hasse from comment #6) > According to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html the Boost > License is GPL compatible. So when I mark the code I copied with the source, > it should work, shouldn't it? See the legal prerequisites. As it says, the FSF prefers to hold the copyright on all code contributed to GCC. If you copy somebody else's code you can't assign copyright to the FSF because you don't own the copyright. We could request all the authors of Boost.Filesystem to assign copyright, but I don't want to do that, I want an independent implementation (the Boost implementation doesn't follow exactly the same specification anyway). I'm not interested in simply copying the Boost.Filesystem code into GCC. If you want to use the Boost implementation then just use that, with appropriate preprocessor hackery and namespace aliases. >From gcc-bugs-return-548603-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 16:58:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42136 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 16:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41950 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 16:58:15 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78886] [5/6/7 Regression] Segmentation fault malloc and volatile Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02766.txt.bz2 Content-length: 513 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78886 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'd say tree-ssa-strlen.c is not the pass that should remove the malloc. The patch is preapproved with suitable testcase and ChangeLog. >From gcc-bugs-return-548604-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 17:08:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 91767 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 17:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 91677 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 17:08:53 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78866] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1, at gimplify.c:8721 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02767.txt.bz2 Content-length: 146 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78866 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far. >From gcc-bugs-return-548605-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 17:11:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96692 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 17:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 96505 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 17:11:05 -0000 From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78888] New: toupper(x) can be assumed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z' Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02768.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1814 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78888 Bug ID: 78888 Summary: toupper(x) can be assumed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z' Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The return value of the toupper function is guaranteed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z'. Similarly, the tolower return value is guaranteed not to be in the range 'A' - 'Z'. For non-EBCDIC character sets, it would be useful to set the range on the return value reflecting this constrained range. (The range is actually the intersection of the range [0, UCHAR_MAX] and the anti-range ~['a', 'z'], plus the value EOF). In addition, it would be useful to issue a warning if the return value is compared against a constant from its anti-range since such a comparison in always false (this might naturally fall out of the optimization). The following test case shows that GCC does not take advantage of this optimization (it doesn't remove the call to f()) or issue the warning. $ cat d.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout d.c void f (void); void g (int x) { if (__builtin_toupper ((unsigned char)x) == 'a') f (); } ;; Function g (g, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1797, cgraph_uid=0, symbol_order=0) Removing basic block 5 g (int x) { int _1; int _6; [100.00%]: _6 = x_3(D) & 255; _1 = __builtin_toupper (_6); if (_1 == 97) goto ; [22.95%] else goto ; [77.05%] [22.95%]: f (); [tail call] [100.00%]: return; } >From gcc-bugs-return-548606-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 17:39:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107965 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 17:39:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107050 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 17:39:44 -0000 From: "mikpelinux at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/71518] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpelinux at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02769.txt.bz2 Content-length: 482 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518 Mikael Pettersson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson --- Shouldn't this be closed as fixed? The fix was backported to gcc-6-branch long ago. >From gcc-bugs-return-548607-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 17:47:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128655 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 17:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128324 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 17:47:23 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78887] [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02770.txt.bz2 Content-length: 228 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you attach the preprocessed sources associated with sha1-ce.o ? It should be only one or two files. >From gcc-bugs-return-548608-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:14:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 73953 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 18:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 73816 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 18:14:07 -0000 From: "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/77345] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and above) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02771.txt.bz2 Content-length: 399 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345 Bernd Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Seems very likely. >From gcc-bugs-return-548609-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:25:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109987 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 18:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108711 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 18:25:35 -0000 From: "eggert at gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: eggert at gnu dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02772.txt.bz2 Content-length: 959 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert --- Just to clarify: 'main' (in the sample program) is just an example. The problems developers are seeing when debugging Emacs almost all involve functions other than 'main'. It should be OK for -Og to optimize significantly less than it does now, so long as -Og remains better than -O0. As things stand, -Og is pretty much useless for its stated purpose because GDB so often cannot display values of locals, and I expect this partly explains why -Og is so rarely used in practice. In Emacs, developers use -O0 for debugging, but this can be reeeaally slow because -O0 does not inline and Emacs relies heavily on small inlined functions. Although Emacs works around this problem by using macros instead of functions, such workarounds have obvious drawbacks. For Emacs, it would be nice if -Og did not discard locals, but continued to inline. >From gcc-bugs-return-548610-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:26:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113742 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 18:26:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113359 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 18:26:42 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78890] New: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid reference type in union Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:26:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02773.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1660 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890 Bug ID: 78890 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid reference type in union Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reddit user sjd96 reported the following issue: % cat union.ii int main() { union { int a; int &b = a; }; a = 1; auto c = b + 1; } % g++ -c union.ii union.ii: In function ‘int main()’: union.ii:1:5: error: invalid first operand of MEM_REF int main() { ^~~~ _2 union.ii:7:12: note: in statement auto c = b + 1; ^ _3 = MEM[(int &)_2]; union.ii:1:5: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed int main() { ^~~~ 0xda2bd5 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool) /home/markus/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:5266 0xc85c06 execute_function_todo /home/markus/gcc/gcc/passes.c:1965 0xc86cab execute_todo /home/markus/gcc/gcc/passes.c:2015 % g++ -std=c++98 -c union.ii union.ii: In function ‘int main()’: union.ii:4:14: warning: non-static data member initializers only available with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 int &b = a; ^ union.ii:4:14: error: in C++98 ‘main()::::b’ may not have reference type ‘int&’ because it is a member of a union union.ii:7:8: error: ‘c’ does not name a type auto c = b + 1; ^ >From gcc-bugs-return-548611-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:29:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123648 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 18:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122914 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 18:29:26 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78749] [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member function in anonymous namespace Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02774.txt.bz2 Content-length: 555 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Dec 21 18:28:54 2016 New Revision: 243862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243862&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/78749 - friend in anonymous namespace * decl.c (wrapup_globals_for_namespace): Don't complain about friend pseudo-template instantiations. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-function3.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548612-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:42:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79109 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 18:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69489 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 18:42:47 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78890] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid reference type in union Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cf_known_to_work everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02775.txt.bz2 Content-length: 532 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-12-21 Known to work| |4.9.4 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail| |5.4.0, 6.3.0, 7.0 >From gcc-bugs-return-548613-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:50:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12057 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 18:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10605 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 18:49:53 -0000 From: "gcc at fischerpaulsen dot dk" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78891] New: Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gcc at fischerpaulsen dot dk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02776.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1523 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Bug ID: 78891 Summary: Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gcc at fischerpaulsen dot dk Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40391 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40391&action=edit Faulty code The included isSet function will return 1 without checking the contents of array if compiled with optimization -O2 -O3 or -Os. Especially it will return 1 if array contains 16 0's - which is wrong. It will work correctly if compiled with lower optimization. It will also work correctly if - the array is defined as unsigned char array[17]; or - the expression array[index] == 0x0 is changed to *(array+index) == 0x0 Note that the code might access the element array[16] - which is outside the array - but the contents of this is irrelvant for the result. The command line used for compilation is gcc -O2 -save-temps -Wall -Wextra -c prog.c It was run on a standard ubuntu PC uname -a Linux cpa-ThinkPad-T530 4.4.0-53-generic #74-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 15:59:10 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The problem has been observed on a number of gcc versions (e.g. cygwin on windows 7 using gcc version 4.9.2) >From gcc-bugs-return-548614-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:01:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27246 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27077 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 19:01:22 -0000 From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/77345] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault w/ -misel -O1 (and above) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02777.txt.bz2 Content-length: 200 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77345 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- It looks very much like PR71724 indeed, but I cannot get this one to fail. >From gcc-bugs-return-548615-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:02:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28263 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28195 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 19:02:06 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02778.txt.bz2 Content-length: 591 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- ((*(array+index) == 0x0) && (index < 16)) This is undefined code. You should swap around the two operands to the short cutting boolean and to have defined code. >From gcc-bugs-return-548616-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:07:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32663 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32008 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 19:07:15 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02779.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1740 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Martin LiÅ¡ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Martin LiÅ¡ka --- Let's consider following runnable test-case: $ cat pr78891.c void readArray(unsigned char *p); int main(void) { unsigned char array[16]; unsigned short index; readArray(array); for(index = 0;((*(array+index) == 0x0) && (index < 16)); ++index); return (index < 16) ? 1 : 0; } $ cat pr78891-2.c void readArray(unsigned char *ptr) { __builtin_bzero (ptr, 16); } $ gcc pr78891.c pr78891-2.c -O2 && valgrind ./a.out ==28173== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==28173== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==28173== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==28173== Command: ./a.out ==28173== ==28173== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==28173== at 0x4003E7: main (in /home/marxin/Programming/testcases/a.out) $ gcc pr78891.c pr78891-2.c -O2 -fsanitize=undefined && ./a.out pr78891.c:10:19: runtime error: load of address 0x7fff856791b0 with insufficient space for an object of type 'unsigned char' 0x7fff856791b0: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b0 06 40 00 00 00 00 00 a0 05 40 00 00 00 00 00 91 c2 ea 1a ^ Both undefined behavior sanitizer and valgrind can detect the undefined behavior. Thus I'm closing as invalid. >From gcc-bugs-return-548617-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:09:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57078 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:09:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 56957 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 19:09:48 -0000 From: "seurer at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02780.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1363 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #19 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Wed Dec 21 19:09:10 2016 New Revision: 243863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243863&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH, v2, rs6000] pr65479 Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables when the -fsanitize=address option is seen. All feedback from the earlier version has been taken into account now. This patch adds the -fasynchronous-unwind-tables option to compilations when the -fsanitize=address option is seen but not if any -fasynchronous-unwind-tables options were already specified. -fasynchronous-unwind-tables causes a full strack trace to be produced when the sanitizer detects an error. Without the full trace several of the asan test cases fail on powerpc. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 for more information. Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this ok for trunk? [gcc] 2016-12-21 Bill Seurer PR sanitizer/65479 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables option when -fsanitize=address is specified. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548618-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:11:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 120620 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113634 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 19:10:56 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78767] [7 Regression] ICE when inheriting constructor of base class Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02781.txt.bz2 Content-length: 528 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78767 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Dec 21 19:10:23 2016 New Revision: 243864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243864&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/78767 - ICE with inherited constructor default argument * method.c (strip_inheriting_ctors): Strip template as appropriate. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor24.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/method.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548619-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:16:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 87610 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 87500 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 19:16:08 -0000 From: "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/11488] Pre-regalloc scheduling severely worsens performance Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02782.txt.bz2 Content-length: 782 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 --- Comment #12 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Wed Dec 21 19:15:32 2016 New Revision: 243866 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243866&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/11488 * common/config/rs6000/rs6000-common.c (rs6000_option_optimization_table): Enable -fsched-pressure. * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (TARGET_COMPUTE_PRESSURE_CLASSES): Define target hook. (rs6000_option_override_internal): Set default -fsched-pressure algorithm. (rs6000_compute_pressure_classes): Implement target hook. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/common/config/rs6000/rs6000-common.c trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c >From gcc-bugs-return-548620-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:39:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12461 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 19:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12281 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 19:39:24 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/42329] Deduction of template template argument via base class fails Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02783.txt.bz2 Content-length: 865 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42329 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Dec 21 19:38:50 2016 New Revision: 243870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243870&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/42329 - deducing base template for template template arg * pt.c (unify_bound_ttp_args): Split out from unify. (try_class_unification): Handle BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM. (unify): Check for type/non-type mismatch early. [BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM]: Try get_template_base. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-ttp6.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/ttp-derived1.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/ttp-derived2.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-2.C >From gcc-bugs-return-548621-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 20:03:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24256 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 20:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23045 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 20:03:03 -0000 From: "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/11488] Pre-regalloc scheduling severely worsens performance Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02784.txt.bz2 Content-length: 287 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 --- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen --- Fixed on powerpc. Testcase times (at 8X original loop count to get measurable times). base: 4.436 sec base + -fno-schedule-insns: 2.052 sec base + patch: 1.815 sec >From gcc-bugs-return-548622-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 21:21:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 66576 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 21:21:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 66289 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 21:21:20 -0000 From: "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/71724] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02785.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2636 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Maybe we just need to test for that condition, even though it's ugly. However, I think there are some other improvements we could make here. Part of the problem seems to be what if_then_else_cond does on this rtx: (plus:SI (if_then_else:SI (eq (reg:CC 185) (const_int 0 [0])) (reg:SI 165) (reg:SI 174 [ t9.0_1+4 ])) (reg:SI 165)) Reg 165 is known to be zero or one, so it gets turned into a condition, and we have two different conditions on the operands. That causes us to fail to make the fairly obvious transformation to cond = reg:CC 185 true_rtx = (plus r165 r165) false_rtx = (plus r174 r165) I'm testing the following, which tries to undo such transformation of plain REG if that seems it'll enable other transformations which are more likely to be beneficial. It makes the crash go away. Index: combine.c =================================================================== --- combine.c (revision 242958) +++ combine.c (working copy) @@ -9031,11 +9031,31 @@ if_then_else_cond (rtx x, rtx *ptrue, rt the same value, compute the new true and false values. */ else if (BINARY_P (x)) { - cond0 = if_then_else_cond (XEXP (x, 0), &true0, &false0); - cond1 = if_then_else_cond (XEXP (x, 1), &true1, &false1); + rtx op0 = XEXP (x, 0); + rtx op1 = XEXP (x, 1); + cond0 = if_then_else_cond (op0, &true0, &false0); + cond1 = if_then_else_cond (op1, &true1, &false1); + + if ((cond0 != 0 && cond1 != 0 && !rtx_equal_p (cond0, cond1)) + && (REG_P (op0) || REG_P (op1))) + { + /* Try to enable a simplification by undoing work done by + if_then_else_cond if it converted a REG into something more + complex. */ + if (REG_P (op0)) + { + cond0 = 0; + true0 = false0 = op0; + } + else + { + cond1 = 0; + true1 = false1 = op1; + } + } if ((cond0 != 0 || cond1 != 0) - && ! (cond0 != 0 && cond1 != 0 && ! rtx_equal_p (cond0, cond1))) + && ! (cond0 != 0 && cond1 != 0 && !rtx_equal_p (cond0, cond1))) { /* If if_then_else_cond returned zero, then true/false are the same rtl. We must copy one of them to prevent invalid rtl >From gcc-bugs-return-548623-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 21:42:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 95743 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 21:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 95538 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 21:42:10 -0000 From: "gcc at fischerpaulsen dot dk" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gcc at fischerpaulsen dot dk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02786.txt.bz2 Content-length: 600 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Christian Paulsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #3 from Christian Paulsen --- valgrind does NOT catch the the problem in the original code using array indexing and not pointer calculation. As the generated code does not access the array at all >From gcc-bugs-return-548624-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 21:59:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116092 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 21:59:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115904 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 21:58:56 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77830] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968, when using constexpr (with testcase) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02787.txt.bz2 Content-length: 850 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77830 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 21:58:23 2016 New Revision: 243873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243873&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/77830 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): Perform out of bounds verification even if lval is true, just allow one past the last element in that case. (cxx_eval_store_expression): Detect stores to out of bound ARRAY_REF. * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr77830.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C: Adjust expected diagnostics. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr77830.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/constexpr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C >From gcc-bugs-return-548625-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:05:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122880 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:05:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 122724 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:04:54 -0000 From: "schwab@linux-m68k.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/78891] Array out of bound access generates wrong code in O2 or higher optimizations Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: schwab@linux-m68k.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02788.txt.bz2 Content-length: 463 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Andreas Schwab changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Because it's undefined there are no constraints. >From gcc-bugs-return-548627-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:06:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125943 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:06:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125682 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:06:08 -0000 From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78656] Fix-it suggestion for std::alocator doesn't include std::allocator Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02790.txt.bz2 Content-length: 384 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78656 David Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org >From gcc-bugs-return-548626-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:06:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125010 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124706 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:05:47 -0000 From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/77829] Bad fix-it for nested-name-specifier Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02789.txt.bz2 Content-length: 384 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77829 David Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org >From gcc-bugs-return-548628-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:16:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16889 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16421 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 22:16:33 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/78817] stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error: argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02791.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2388 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 22:15:59 2016 New Revision: 243874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243874&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/78817 * tree-pass.h (make_pass_post_ipa_warn): Declare. * builtins.c (validate_arglist): Adjust get_nonnull_args call. Check for NULL pointer argument to nonnull arg here. (validate_arg): Revert 2016-12-14 changes. * calls.h (get_nonnull_args): Remove declaration. * tree-ssa-ccp.c: Include diagnostic-core.h. (pass_data_post_ipa_warn): New variable. (pass_post_ipa_warn): New class. (pass_post_ipa_warn::execute): New method. (make_pass_post_ipa_warn): New function. * tree.h (get_nonnull_args): Declare. * tree.c (get_nonnull_args): New function. * calls.c (maybe_warn_null_arg): Removed. (maybe_warn_null_arg): Removed. (initialize_argument_information): Revert 2016-12-14 changes. * passes.def: Add pass_post_ipa_warn after first ccp after IPA. c-family/ * c-common.c (struct nonnull_arg_ctx): New type. (check_function_nonnull): Return bool instead of void. Use nonnull_arg_ctx as context rather than just location_t. (check_nonnull_arg): Adjust for the new context type, set warned_p to true if a warning has been diagnosed. (check_function_arguments): Return bool instead of void. * c-common.h (check_function_arguments): Adjust prototype. c/ * c-typeck.c (build_function_call_vec): If check_function_arguments returns true, set TREE_NO_WARNING on CALL_EXPR. cp/ * typeck.c (cp_build_function_call_vec): If check_function_arguments returns true, set TREE_NO_WARNING on CALL_EXPR. * call.c (build_over_call): Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/builtins.c trunk/gcc/c-family/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/c-family/c-common.c trunk/gcc/c-family/c-common.h trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/c/c-typeck.c trunk/gcc/calls.c trunk/gcc/calls.h trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/call.c trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c trunk/gcc/passes.def trunk/gcc/tree-pass.h trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c trunk/gcc/tree.c trunk/gcc/tree.h >From gcc-bugs-return-548629-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:20:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22597 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22434 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 22:20:43 -0000 From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78580] [6/7 Regression] Segfault in gcc with multilib (-m32) and -ffixed-* Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02792.txt.bz2 Content-length: 746 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Dec 21 22:20:11 2016 New Revision: 243875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243875&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-21 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/78580 * ira-costs.c (find_costs_and_classes): Make regno_aclass translated into an allocno class. 2016-12-21 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/78580 * gcc.target/i386/pr78580.c: New. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr78580.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/ira-costs.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548630-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:21:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25824 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25719 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:21:41 -0000 From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/78812] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation due to hoisting memory load across function call Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02793.txt.bz2 Content-length: 623 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So it's been a long time... And IIRC, rth was the one that fixed this wart in gcse. A BB that ends with a call that can throw or any other abnormal edge is supposed to suppress hoisting for precisely the reasons outlined in this BZ. Essentially we need to insert on the edge, but we can't (easily) do that for the EH/abnormal edge and we can't safely insert before the call. Theother possibility was that we kill the expressions in the EH landing pads. I thought we looked at that as well. >From gcc-bugs-return-548631-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:25:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28513 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:25:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28336 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:25:25 -0000 From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/71724] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02794.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1274 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- I am using the following, which also fixes the infinite loop, and seems to not regress code quality much at all (I found *one* pattern where it made things one machine insn worse, involving a define_insn_and_split (with cost 0, so any finite cost is better -- combine did manage to do something that is better according to its costs!) But I am worried something similar then needs to be done to true_rtx, and I don't see what. === diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c index c7255f0..ecdd3fd 100644 --- a/gcc/combine.c +++ b/gcc/combine.c @@ -5658,7 +5658,7 @@ combine_simplify_rtx (rtx x, machine_mode op0_mode, int in here since true_rtx or false_rtx might share RTL with x as a result of the if_then_else_cond call above. */ true_rtx = subst (copy_rtx (true_rtx), pc_rtx, pc_rtx, 0, 0, 0); - false_rtx = subst (copy_rtx (false_rtx), pc_rtx, pc_rtx, 0, 0, 0); + false_rtx = subst (copy_rtx (false_rtx), cond, const0_rtx, 0, 0, 0); /* If true_rtx and false_rtx are not general_operands, an if_then_else is unlikely to be simpler. */ === >From gcc-bugs-return-548632-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:26:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29539 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:26:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29476 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:26:04 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/42329] Deduction of template template argument via base class fails Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:26:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution assigned_to target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02795.txt.bz2 Content-length: 569 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42329 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed for GCC 7. >From gcc-bugs-return-548633-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:26:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47643 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:26:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39616 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:26:46 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78767] [7 Regression] ICE when inheriting constructor of base class Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:26:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02796.txt.bz2 Content-length: 423 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78767 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed. >From gcc-bugs-return-548634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:27:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68616 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:27:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 64327 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:27:36 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78749] [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member function in anonymous namespace Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02797.txt.bz2 Content-length: 422 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed >From gcc-bugs-return-548635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:30:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97403 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:30:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 97224 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:30:28 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78826] jump bypasses non-POD Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02798.txt.bz2 Content-length: 308 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78826 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Jason, do you see any advantage to making this a pedwarn for -std=c++98 That seems to make sense, given that other compilers diagnose it. >From gcc-bugs-return-548636-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:40:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124147 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:40:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123870 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 22:40:14 -0000 From: "damian at sourceryinstitute dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/78892] New: [7.0 Regression] no type conversion before coarray put Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: damian at sourceryinstitute dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02799.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1359 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78892 Bug ID: 78892 Summary: [7.0 Regression] no type conversion before coarray put Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: damian at sourceryinstitute dot org Target Milestone: --- The code below demonstrates a regression in which gfortran 7.0.0 20161215 is not performing a necessary implicit type conversion before putting data on a remote image. By contrast, the code below works as expected with gfortran 5.4.0 and 6.2.0. $ cat convert-before-put.f90 real :: a[*] integer :: receiver associate(me=>this_image()) if (me == 1) then do receiver = 2, num_images() a[receiver] = receiver ! implicit real(receiver) needed here sync images (receiver) ! notify remote image that data has been put end do else sync images (1) ! await notification of data put by image 1 if (a/=real(me)) print *, "Image ",me,": received ",a,", but expected ",real(me) end if end associate end $ caf convert-before-put.f90 $ cafrun -np 2 ./a.out Image 2 : received 0.00000000 , but expected 2.00000000 >From gcc-bugs-return-548637-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 22:50:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10855 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 22:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10185 invoked by uid 55); 21 Dec 2016 22:50:31 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/72707] [5/6/7 regression] local anonymous union member hides names in the same scope Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02800.txt.bz2 Content-length: 618 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72707 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 22:49:59 2016 New Revision: 243877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243877&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/72707 * name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend_1): Do check shadowing of artificial x if it is an anonymous union variable. * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-12.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-12.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >From gcc-bugs-return-548638-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 23:27:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 89895 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 23:27:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 88917 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 23:26:57 -0000 From: "williambader at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/78893] New: gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: williambader at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02801.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1149 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893 Bug ID: 78893 Summary: gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: williambader at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40392 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40392&action=edit build log I built gcc-6.3.0 on CentOS 4, 5, and 6 using the same procedures that had worked for previous gcc-6 releases, but on CentOS 7, the build fails in genattrtab. genattrtab crashes pretty hard -- running it under valgrind ends with 'Killed', and valgrind exists without giving a traceback or diagnostics. gdb couldn't get a stack trace either. I also tried running the build with -O0. Is there anything else that I can try? I attached a log of the configure and make. The system is CentOS 7.3.1611 with kernel 3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.x86_64 and gcc 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-11). Regards, William >From gcc-bugs-return-548639-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 23:38:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11246 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 23:38:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11143 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 23:38:06 -0000 From: "tom.m935 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78894] New: [c++17] ICE for std::list template deduction from std:: initializer_list Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tom.m935 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02802.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1663 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78894 Bug ID: 78894 Summary: [c++17] ICE for std::list template deduction from std:: initializer_list Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tom.m935 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40393 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40393&action=edit Preprocessed source The code (preprocessed attached) #include int main() { // Should construct std::list std::list list = { 0, 0 }; // ^ // internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14727, Abort trap: 6 } crashes on gcc 7.0.0 20161204. Expected behaviour is to construct a std::list with two 0 elements. Command: g++ bug.ii -std=c++17 -Wall -Wextra Error: bug.cpp: In function 'std::__cxx11::list(std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type, const value_type&, const allocator_type&)-> std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Alloc> [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator; std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type = long unsigned int; std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Alloc>::value_type = int; std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocator_type = std::allocator]': bug.cpp:5:29: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14727 std::list list = { 0, 0 }; ^ bug.cpp:5:29: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6 g++: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6 (program cc1plus) >From gcc-bugs-return-548640-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 23:44:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17716 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 23:44:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17603 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 23:43:48 -0000 From: "james410 at cowgill dot org.uk" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/78895] New: [6 regression] wrong code with -O1 when setting union twice since 6.3 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02803.txt.bz2 Content-length: 3140 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78895 Bug ID: 78895 Summary: [6 regression] wrong code with -O1 when setting union twice since 6.3 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: james410 at cowgill dot org.uk Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40394 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40394&action=edit union-twice.c The attached testcase correctly prints nothing and exits with status 0 when using GCC 6.2, but with 6.3 it prints "FAIL" and exits with status 10. Originally reduced from strange behavior in jackd2 (https://bugs.debian.org/848285). The noinline bit is not required in the original code in jackd2, but is in my testcase. Compiled with: gcc -O1 union-twice.c -o union-twice I bisected it to revision 241788 (the first bad revision): 2016-11-02 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2016-11-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/78047 * tree-ssa-structalias.c (push_fields_onto_fieldstack): Initialize fake field at offset zero conservatively regarding to may_have_pointers. 2016-10-31 Richard Biener PR lto/78129 * lto.c (do_whole_program_analysis): Bail out after errors from WPA analysis. 2016-10-07 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/77879 * tree-ssa-structalias.c (handle_const_call): Properly handle NRV return slots. (handle_pure_call): Likewise. 2016-10-06 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/77839 * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (set_ssa_val_to): Forbid value -> constant value lattice transition. * gcc.dg/torture/pr77839.c: New testcase. 2016-09-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/77745 * tree-ssa-pre.c (eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children): When removing redundant stores make sure to check compatibility of the TBAA state for downstream accesses. * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (visit_reference_op_store): Likewise for when value-numbering virtual operands for store matches. * g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C: New testcase. 2016-09-21 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/77648 * tree-ssa-structalias.c (process_constraint): Handle all DEREF with complex RHS. (make_transitive_closure_constraints): Adjust comment. (make_any_offset_constraints): New function. (handle_rhs_call): Make sure to first expand a pointer to all subfields before transitively closing it. (handle_const_call): Likewise. Properly expand returned pointers as well. (handle_pure_call): Likewise. * gcc.dg/torture/pr77648-1.c: New testcase. * gcc.dg/torture/pr77648-2.c: Likewise. >From gcc-bugs-return-548641-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 00:02:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70802 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 00:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70713 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 00:02:37 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/78893] gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02804.txt.bz2 Content-length: 269 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >make[3]: *** [s-attrtab] Killed How much memory do you have on your system? Do you have a swap space? Provide the output of the command "free". >From gcc-bugs-return-548642-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 00:31:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23191 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 00:31:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23044 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 00:30:56 -0000 From: "williambader at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/78893] gcc-6.3.0 build fails on genattrtab on CentOS 7 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: williambader at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02805.txt.bz2 Content-length: 567 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893 --- Comment #2 from William Bader --- Thanks for the quick reply. The system is a VM. I have the results of 'free' below. The VMs where the build worked all have slightly more memory and swap. What is the recommended minimum to build gcc-6? $ free -h total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 993M 239M 382M 10M 371M 564M Swap: 1.0G 977M 47M Regards, William >From gcc-bugs-return-548643-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 00:34:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26047 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 00:34:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25933 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 00:34:28 -0000 From: "duongdominhchau at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78896] New: Segmentation fault occurs when use variable initialized using structured binding with capture-by-ref lambda Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: duongdominhchau at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02806.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2256 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78896 Bug ID: 78896 Summary: Segmentation fault occurs when use variable initialized using structured binding with capture-by-ref lambda Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: duongdominhchau at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I found a segmentation fault while trying structured binding using GCC 7: This is the source code which caused the segmentation fault: int main() { int a {10}; auto [b]{ [&a](){} }; return b - a; } The same code under Clang 4 would raise an error instead of a segmentation fault. GCC 7: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/WDd8mSy4dCXj8CSa Clang 4: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/EQfQxrdTrbNbTw2b If I change the lambda to capture by value, or never use the variable initialized using structured binding (the variable `b` in my code), no segmentation fault occurs. This is the output of the compiler: prog.cc: In function 'int main()': prog.cc:4:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault return b - a; ^ 0xb04b0f crash_signal /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/toplev.c:333 0x88b893 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool) /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/expr.c:10107 0x895c1a store_expr_with_bounds(tree_node*, rtx_def*, int, bool, bool, tree_node*) /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/expr.c:5552 0x89684e expand_assignment(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool) /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/expr.c:5321 0x7ab45d expand_gimple_stmt_1 /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3641 0x7ab45d expand_gimple_stmt /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3737 0x7aca1f expand_gimple_basic_block /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5744 0x7b1be6 execute /home/heads/gcc/gcc-source/gcc/cfgexpand.c:6355 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions. >From gcc-bugs-return-548644-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 05:58:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20879 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 05:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20828 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 05:58:14 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78897] New: ICE: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5019 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02807.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1928 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78897 Bug ID: 78897 Summary: ICE: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5019 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- markus@x4 /tmp % cat const.ii struct Optional { constexpr Optional() : _dummy{} { _value = 1; } union { int _dummy; int _value; }; }; Optional opt{}; markus@x4 /tmp % clang++ -std=c++14 -c const.ii markus@x4 /tmp % icpc -std=c++14 -c const.ii markus@x4 /tmp % g++ -c const.ii const.ii:8:15: internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5019 Optional opt{}; ^ 0x104e345 output_constructor_regular_field /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:5019 0x104e345 output_constructor /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:5327 0x104d2aa output_constant /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:4704 0x104d2aa output_constructor_regular_field /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:5057 0x104d2aa output_constructor /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:5327 0x104f4d1 output_constant /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:4704 0x104f4d1 assemble_variable_contents /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:2083 0x10561ef assemble_variable(tree_node*, int, int, int) /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varasm.c:2259 0x105ba21 varpool_node::assemble_decl() /home/markus/gcc/gcc/varpool.c:588 0x96311c output_in_order /home/markus/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2248 0x963523 symbol_table::compile() /home/markus/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2488 0x965ed6 symbol_table::compile() /home/markus/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2587 0x965ed6 symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit() /home/markus/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2584 >From gcc-bugs-return-548645-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 06:06:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47606 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 06:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25219 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 06:03:51 -0000 From: "coolypf at qq dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: coolypf at qq dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02808.txt.bz2 Content-length: 713 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 Yuan Pengfei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED CC| |law at redhat dot com Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- --- Comment #7 from Yuan Pengfei --- After some binary search, I figure out that this bug is a regression since r226516 . Here are the related patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01856.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00096.html >From gcc-bugs-return-548646-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 06:10:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39927 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 06:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 39788 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 06:10:28 -0000 From: "coolypf at qq dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/78879] -fprofile-generate causes undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN' Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: coolypf at qq dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02809.txt.bz2 Content-length: 240 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78879 --- Comment #8 from Yuan Pengfei --- I have sent a patch that fixes this bug. Please review it. Thanks! https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01824.html >From gcc-bugs-return-548647-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 06:19:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 100063 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 06:19:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99896 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 06:19:08 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78894] [c++17] ICE for std::list template deduction from std:: initializer_list Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02810.txt.bz2 Content-length: 562 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78894 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-12-22 CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org, | |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 >From gcc-bugs-return-548648-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 06:55:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41255 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 06:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41089 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2016 06:55:03 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/78898] New: [7 Regression] ICE: in get_template_base, at cp/pt.c:19665 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg02811.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2858 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78898 Bug ID: 78898 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: in get_template_base, at cp/pt.c:19665 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jason at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- A very recent regression: % cat nsIconChannel.ii struct A { template A(T); template