From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6DD653857815; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:32:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6DD653857815 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/79173] add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:32:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 21:32:57 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79173 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Michael_S from comment #5) > I agree with regard to "other targets", first of all, aarch64, but x86_64 > variant of gcc already provides requested functionality in for of > _subborrow_u64 () and _addcarry_u64() intrinsic functions. > The problem here is not lack of functionality, but very poor implementati= on > (mentioned many times on bugzilla with minimal effect). > In that regard gcc is more than decade behind MSVC and ~4 years behind > clang/llvm. Surprisingly, icc is also quite bad. Are you sure you have tested gcc trunk? There have been fixes for this a month ago as part of PR97387 fixes.=