* [Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390
[not found] <bug-79341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2024-03-30 17:40 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-03 11:25 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-30 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #75 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #25)
> Looks better, but now we get this quite often:
>
> --
> ==23722==ERROR: Your kernel seems to be vulnerable to CVE-2016-2143. Using
> ASa\
> n,
> MSan, TSan, DFSan or LSan with such kernel can and will crash your
> machine, or worse.
> --
>
> I'll try to figure out what kernel version we need.
Why does this error message mention all of those sanitizers, when GCC only
supports some of them?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390
[not found] <bug-79341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2024-03-30 17:40 ` [Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-03 11:25 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2024-04-04 13:09 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-04 7:31 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2024-04-03 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #76 from Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> ---
It's because the sanitizer runtime was copied from LLVM to GCC. I will post a
patch removing the unsupported MSan and DFSan from the error message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390
[not found] <bug-79341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2024-03-30 17:40 ` [Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-03 11:25 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
@ 2024-04-04 13:09 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-04 7:31 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: iii at linux dot ibm.com @ 2024-04-04 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #77 from Ilya Leoshkevich <iii at linux dot ibm.com> ---
Apparently fixing the message in GCC will produce maintenance overhead [1]. If
that's not very important to you, I'd rather leave this message as is.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/648775.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/79341] Many Asan tests fail on s390
[not found] <bug-79341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-04 13:09 ` iii at linux dot ibm.com
@ 2024-05-04 7:31 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-05-04 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #78 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #77)
> Apparently fixing the message in GCC will produce maintenance overhead [1].
> If that's not very important to you, I'd rather leave this message as is.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/648775.html
OK, I haven't actually seen GCC emit the message in the wild myself yet,
actually; I only came across it due to searching for bugs related to MSan...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread