public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/7957] change request: more flexible %D specs directive so no need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH
       [not found] <bug-7957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-06-21 16:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-21 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7957

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> I really doubt that we want this option as we have always recommend in
> setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Relying on LD_LIBRARY_PATH can be a liability. The "RPATH is evil" argument is
mostly based on NFS problems, but if I never allow NFS near my systems then
that argument doesn't stand up.

Users should be able to choose for themselves if they want to use RPATH or
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

PR 53002 makes it easier to use specs to solve this problem, PR 45508 comment
10 describes a plan that would be equivalent to --with-rpath-in-specs, so
closing this as a dup

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45508 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/7957] change request: more flexible %D specs directive so no need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH
       [not found] <20020917182600.7957.bh@techhouse.brown.edu>
@ 2004-11-18 12:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-18 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-18 12:37 -------
I really doubt that we want this option as we have always recommend in setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2004-08-19 05:32:11         |2004-11-18 12:37:36
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7957


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-21 16:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-7957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-06-21 16:23 ` [Bug driver/7957] change request: more flexible %D specs directive so no need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH redi at gcc dot gnu.org
     [not found] <20020917182600.7957.bh@techhouse.brown.edu>
2004-11-18 12:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).