public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-05-14 9:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:48 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 22:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:48 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-14 22:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-14 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following tentative change fixes testcase z1 in comment#5:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/primary.c b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
index 3f01f67cd49..d3729b20446 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/primary.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
@@ -3373,8 +3373,8 @@ gfc_match_structure_constructor (gfc_symbol *sym,
gfc_expr **result)
e->expr_type = EXPR_FUNCTION;
e->where = gfc_current_locus;
- gcc_assert (gfc_fl_struct (sym->attr.flavor)
- && symtree->n.sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE);
+ gcc_assert (gfc_fl_struct (sym->attr.flavor));
+// && symtree->n.sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE);
e->value.function.esym = sym;
e->symtree->n.sym->attr.generic = 1;
However, it does not fix the example in comment#0.
Playing a little, it seems that commenting the "implicit none" in module foo
then lets the code compile.
Alternative reproducer:
module m
implicit none
private
public :: t
type t
integer :: i
end type
end
module m2
use m, t2 => t
implicit none ! <--- Error: Symbol 't' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
private
type(t2), public, protected :: x(2)
data x(1) /t2(3)/
end
program p
use m2
implicit none
print *, x(1)%i
end program p
So there is more to it...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/79685] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-14 22:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:32 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/79685] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:32 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/79685] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-79685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-05-14 9:48 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 22:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:32 ` [Bug fortran/79685] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).