From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 32C9A3893664; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:10:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 32C9A3893664 From: "kip at thevertigo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/79700] std::fabsf and std::fabsl missing from Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:09:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kip at thevertigo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:10:00 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79700 --- Comment #12 from Kip Warner --- I didn't say STL. I said library designers which includes the standard C runtime. And no, I don't agree with you. Separate names are helpful for gre= ater certainty. As for std::ceilf existing just for consistency with C, that's speculative and, in my view doubtful.=