From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127141 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 09:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127001 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 09:46:03 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/79740] [7 Regression] ICE on -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:407 }) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03286.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79740 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |45397 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Testing patch. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D45397 [Bug 45397] [5/6 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions >>From gcc-bugs-return-555755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 09:49:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5553 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 09:49:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5445 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 09:49:00 -0000 From: "bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03287.txt.bz2 Content-length: 892 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79671 --- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23) > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #22) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > > > which fails also on x86_64-linux at -O2. And that testcase regressed= with > > > r223126. Now whether this is valid C++, no idea, placement new is me= ssy. > >=20 > > This test case can't be valid, suppose the A has a copy constructor > > that that is also not called when B is moved around. >=20 > The canonical fix is to put the type you placement new into the union sto= rage > into the union as regular member rather than having a char[] member in the > union. Yes. Of course you cannot put a non-POD type in a union, but maybe a pointer to A, that is probably what boost should do in their functor class. >>From gcc-bugs-return-555756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 09:57:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41538 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 09:57:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41475 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 09:57:08 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/79737] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03288.txt.bz2 Content-length: 578 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79737 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40842 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D40842&action=3Dedit gcc7-pr79737.patch Untested fix. >>From gcc-bugs-return-555757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:02:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48948 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 10:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 48848 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 10:02:08 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/79731] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03289.txt.bz2 Content-length: 432 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79731 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Ugh, the BIT_FIELD_REF is built by fold_truth_andor... (elsewhere we avoid creating those). We fold (BIT_FIELD_REF & 18446744073709551615) !=3D 0 || VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(x)[2] !=3D 0 Probably best avoided in decode_field_reference by returning NULL_TREE for out-of-bound accesses. >>From gcc-bugs-return-555758-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:05:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57997 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 10:05:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57565 invoked by uid 55); 28 Feb 2017 10:05:21 -0000 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03290.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1261 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79671 --- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79671 >=20 > --- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23) > > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #22) > > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > > > > which fails also on x86_64-linux at -O2. And that testcase regress= ed with > > > > r223126. Now whether this is valid C++, no idea, placement new is = messy. > > >=20 > > > This test case can't be valid, suppose the A has a copy constructor > > > that that is also not called when B is moved around. > >=20 > > The canonical fix is to put the type you placement new into the union s= torage > > into the union as regular member rather than having a char[] member in = the > > union. >=20 > Yes. Of course you cannot put a non-POD type in a union, > but maybe a pointer to A, that is probably what boost should > do in their functor class. You can put a non-POD into a union but then you need to provide copy/move/etc. constructors as they are otherwise default deleted. >>From gcc-bugs-return-555759-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:15:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5555 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 10:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5374 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 10:15:20 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/79744] New: [7 Regression] The polyhedron test rnflow.f90 is miscompiled with -O3 after r236361 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03291.txt.bz2 Content-length: 2286 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79744 Bug ID: 79744 Summary: [7 Regression] The polyhedron test rnflow.f90 is miscompiled with -O3 after r236361 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- When compiled with gfortran 6.3.0 (or trunk up to r236319) and -O3, the polyhedron test rnflow.f90 gives the output ... 173 , 181 194373 193363 0.519999981=20=20=20= =20 173 , 189 78369 78008 0.460000008=20=20=20= =20 173 , 197 19089 18777 1.63000000=20=20=20= =20 181 , 189 81645 81532 0.140000001=20=20=20= =20 181 , 197 29924 29571 1.17999995=20=20=20= =20 189 , 197 32866 33059 0.579999983=20=20=20= =20 189 , 205 12258 12352 0.759999990=20=20=20= =20 197 , 205 10923 10786 1.25000000=20=20=20= =20 205 , 213 3278 3208 2.14000010=20=20=20= =20 0: 0:17.492 -> Completed program execution After revision r236361 (pr71168) ... 165 , 197 9830 9748 0.829999983=20=20=20= =20 165 , 205 1529 1461 4.44999981=20=20=20= =20 173 , 181 194373 194038 0.170000002=20=20=20= =20 173 , 189 78369 78584 0.270000011=20=20=20= =20 173 , 197 19089 19180 0.469999999=20=20=20= =20 181 , 189 81645 81303 0.419999987=20=20=20= =20 181 , 197 29924 30302 1.25000000=20=20=20= =20 189 , 205 12258 12546 2.29999995=20=20=20= =20 197 , 213 2790 2698 3.29999995=20=20=20= =20 0: 0:22.058 -> Completed program execution Note also that the execution time increases by ~30%. >>From gcc-bugs-return-555760-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:22:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29711 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 10:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29631 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 10:22:17 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03292.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1534 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79671 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- What about PODs or say int? Let's say I have a class with union in it and = in that union say float and char array, then use placement new an int with some value into the char array in the union. What will then happen if I default copy the class (default assignment operator or copy constructor)? The following doesn't fail, but I think true_dependence still returns 0 for (mem/c:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp) (const_int 4 [0x4])) [4 MEM[(int *)&b + 4B]+0 S4 A32]) and (mem:DI (reg/v/f:DI 0 ax [orig:87 p ] [87]) [1 MEM[(const struct B &)p_4]+0= S8 A32]) where the former is from the placement new store of int and the load is from the structure assignment. inline void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, void *p) { return p; } struct B { float x; union U { float a; char b[sizeof (int)]; } u; float y; }; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void bar (B &x, B &y) { if (x.x !=3D 0 || x.y !=3D 3 || y.x !=3D 0 || y.y !=3D 3) __builtin_abort (); int f; __builtin_memcpy (&f, x.u.b, sizeof (int)); if (f !=3D 81) __builtin_abort (); __builtin_memcpy (&f, y.u.b, sizeof (int)); if (f !=3D 81) __builtin_abort (); } __attribute__((noinline, noclone))=20 B * baz (B &x) { return &x; } __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void foo (int x) { B b { 0.0f, {}, 3.0f }, c; B *p =3D baz (b); new (b.u.b) int (x); c =3D *p; bar (*p, c); } int main () { foo (81); } >>From gcc-bugs-return-555761-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:24:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43444 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 10:24:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43396 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2017 10:24:54 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/79744] [7 Regression] The polyhedron test rnflow.f90 is miscompiled with -O3 after r236361 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03293.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1848 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D79744 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2017-02-28 Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. The pb11 version is fine though: On x86_64-linux I see, comparing GCC 4.8 and trunk: 173 , 197 19089 18777 1.63000000=20=20=20= =20 181 , 189 81645 81532 0.140000001=20=20=20= =20 181 , 197 29924 29571 1.17999995=20=20=20= =20 189 , 197 32866 33059 0.579999983=20=20=20= =20 189 , 205 12258 12352 0.759999990=20=20=20= =20 197 , 205 10923 10786 1.25000000=20=20=20= =20 205 , 213 3278 3208 2.14000010=20=20=20= =20 0: 0:16.006 -> Completed program execution and GCC 7: 173 , 197 19089 18777 1.63000000=20=20=20= =20 181 , 189 81645 81532 0.140000001=20=20=20= =20 181 , 197 29924 29571 1.17999995=20=20=20= =20 189 , 197 32866 33059 0.579999983=20=20=20= =20 189 , 205 12258 12352 0.759999990=20=20=20= =20 197 , 205 10923 10786 1.25000000=20=20=20= =20 205 , 213 3278 3208 2.14000010=20=20=20= =20 0: 0:14.109 -> Completed program execution >>From gcc-bugs-return-555762-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 28 10:31:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 54211 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2017 10:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 54116 invoked by uid 89); 28 Feb 2017 10:31:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=emails, auto-generated X-HELO: mail-wm0-f68.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f68.google.com) (74.125.82.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:31:53 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id u63so1619098wmu.2 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 02:31:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5K9vKMS3eLdgqpiCEEf6abf9nQ4sGd+SdHktqjn3SsU=; b=L6MIibNszZ70WkUrqdcfU4hirdv/ZGmUvgAWp5emZgDbKwTJPIJLRCNongsjZQ2a3J 9nDlvjKps0LnG47Bg8oXd2aZmd8PmtzF0RIWXk/LN41rrPrDnajrJ6k7iPMFy4wC6+sf ntm18zWSZDU/usxLqceySBItG8Hmidm38svhsys4/KkUgzjmFq282e0xDmEA9Wnn6E+0 HJl3pRCrhpF8So/I1qRWX/viCB8lRGQO/Bf0Qd/IwmODY6Vdsg4kIs3kiPgOKQk9zGO9 VnvbYnbw+WksaHLvKe1UmgPB1gx4DGK/t9/w+2N0Ryz4bfXSf0STaIg4La4fG1BH5zRj MNHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39msqlXun8hNI0AMRDPSveiTwJWJXatxi0iBYnoAsYtAccW4Op08rglu4MKI/rQigQ== X-Received: by 10.28.37.195 with SMTP id l186mr17014926wml.73.1488277912104; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 02:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2001:cc0:201e:102:3e97:eff:fea9:6aa7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i203sm2048322wmf.12.2017.02.28.02.31.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 02:31:51 -0800 (PST) From: "Casper Ti. Vector" X-Google-Original-From: "Casper Ti. Vector" Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:31:00 -0000 To: Kyrill Tkachov , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bogus `-Wmaybe-uninitialized' warning with optimisation and `-Wall' Message-ID: <20170228103145.GA19323@CasperVector> References: <20170228090956.GA6321@CasperVector> <58B545D8.2060306@foss.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58B545D8.2060306@foss.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg03294.txt.bz2 Content-length: 533 Sorry then. After being rejected by the registration restriction of GCC Bugzilla, I erroneously thought this mail list could be a shortcut :( On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:41:44AM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi, > This list is for the bug-tracker's auto-generated emails. > To report the bug please use the bugzilla bug tracker following the instructions > described at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#where -- My current OpenPGP key: RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19) 7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C