From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 200BF39BCC77; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:28:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 200BF39BCC77 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/80223] RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:28:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:28:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D80223 --- Comment #22 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- > For example, if an inlining pass happens after instrumentation, then the > function attribute doesn't necessarily need to suppress inlining. After > instrumentation is done, we can even treat the noprofile attribute as a > no-op. In the case of GCC, the instrumentation happens before inlining, but after early inlining. The patch reviewer noticed that and we would implement it t= hat way. So yes, in order to preserve the attribute contract, we have to block inlin= ing for functions decorated with the attribute.=