From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AFB09385841A; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:26:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AFB09385841A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687526802; bh=tuqXo055vk4ECEbdsdWEviKfB8e2kaU2a6y7iU3d4Uk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ufz8zK0hMXP3IdtflO2a9FOmIxWYvFCmELU/OFgen68cTmGTcVhl/MvR7rhbPiBU5 EnftRojOEL5ZvkHV0R/K2MqX5ZM9LF4dkmwsi0/jFFdxJ7sRHj6vyD21L39UWthYYC 8UyKRqd3zUAxHfKlnv3SC1jn6C4lq/lQk2fTfOZk= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/80242] [C++17+] "Trailing return types" with "non-type template arguments" which could be "constant expressions" produce a parsing error Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:26:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D80242 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Roland Schulz from comment #2) > Is https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76534613/ a duplicate of this? Yes, this is in turn a dup of the older PR68495 I think *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68495 ***=