From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A19CA3857711; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:17:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A19CA3857711
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1702513061;
	bh=UibhLGXk3KfRhLjvuwXUQHOd/HE9zVeuXKEGb4ZuID8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Cn3WvIERFlT1Kij9SXcfNyASNJAlqTLfxQi73tGU/4DgAXErY4+tG8yT87ahp2GeU
	 PTY6cgZi+tIoqIXuo+JJiYeA70Y5dOn0DwSE5V/hEkskXZuY9jFpPH1uWu0NfX0V5O
	 1Kgt42sppkqKTEabs0mk4IBfTqMFhO7CQrIJn/H8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/80283] [11/12/13/14 Regression] bad SIMD register
 allocation
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:17:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.0.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-80283-4-o2yHDlF7be@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-80283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-80283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D80283

--- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For aarch64, the test from comment #11 is so much worse on the trunk than in
GCC 13.2.0.=