From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F34C83858C5F; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:10:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F34C83858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709079051;
	bh=PNr1FXq3O+admIJY+a76QhmjCewnW+xNF39X+DCkWow=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Cr48MMlpDfEzd6CpaCbb7+V0TGf5XXq7oRm1M6kYEF+4X4mgGiX/OMvYMPblyeynm
	 8Cv61vZQURjceIrNP+w7prePit2jNmKgvZcwne6eU/hdDRxYMXsfvLRj4w/9c3fdgZ
	 qBZz1BYJadKo4y93FTU6hgeACaeWSKNz5paRvM2Y=
From: "lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/80755] __has_include_next: internal compiler
 error: NULL directory in find_file
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:10:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-80755-4-9ieG2CtzWq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-80755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-80755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D80755

--- Comment #6 from Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> Thank you Lewis!
>=20
> Would you mind pinging this again?
>=20
> I've just started hitting this on glibc systems too as we added a wrapper=
 to
> a libbsd header (which I'm probably going to have to drop for now).

Sure, I tried...
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/646695.html. I think
reviewers are probably focused on other things for the GCC 14 release thoug=
h, I
have 3 or 4 libcpp patches that have been waiting for months now, and they =
may
not make it into 14.0 if they aren't regressions. It may help if you chime =
in
on the gcc-patches thread as well?=