From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 66906385840D; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:04:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 66906385840D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1703016241; bh=CyvFgs1MYU8LzL3XuF5brUglGJL6DqXs5CvZKmUyTCc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jyP/2pK/4ybRa9FUcrWoAYK7+jdS4KcVE+RDlCLtkzf6XJuVolCUsj9s6xBL/zKCw rlJvvQAhuv/QrrywDNv0McWyjUo1AJ27eUWIT5yV2bD97GsvN/57wPbd3tlMRYVbnW OBe2cmDlRVU2L09JrkpJshklHO0EJjjqP7KxEYsA= From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:04:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D81615 Jerry DeLisle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.o= rg --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #18) > (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #17) > > Just a ping: it would be nice if this could be fixed, I'm currently try= ing > > to debug/reduce a miscompiled benchmark which has *.f90 source files but > > -save-temps isn't useful due to this issue. >=20 > The patch in comment#16 seems to work and looks good to me, but it appears > to never have been submitted for review. >=20 > One could also add a mini-section in invoke.texi by borrowing from > gcc/doc/invoke.texi (-> Developer Options) and add a minimal example > for -save-temps in the context of gfortran use. It seems simple. Shall we post the patch to make sure we dont get any broad= er objections? If none, then we commit.=