From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C93373840C25; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:42:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C93373840C25
From: "dhoyer at netapp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate
 incorrect debugging information
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:42:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dhoyer at netapp dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-81932-4-eunChoxuiP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-81932-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-81932-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:42:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D81932

--- Comment #33 from David Hoyer <dhoyer at netapp dot com> ---
(In reply to Paul Smith from comment #32)
> No movement AFAIK.  It's apparently the tip of a particularly gross icebe=
rg.
> It doesn't seem like partial measures appeal to people, and no one has the
> needed combination of time, knowledge, and contacts to attack the entire
> iceberg.
>=20
> For myself, since I build my own version of GCC for my work, I apply
> something similar to (or maybe exactly, I can't remember now) Xi Ruoyao's
> patch attached to this bug, and it Works For Me, at least for this specif=
ic
> problem.

that is good to know.   I hate the idea of doing this... but maybe it becom=
es
required.=