From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 15F713858D39; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:57:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 15F713858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1681837061; bh=NBjxkm4V/y7SNtfIDyo4S/b+NrodHLRZWPSU12nfptE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=N0qrCWSC/mSFJqYL/UHhA+Hxd0BfW2LAbKiuDXEmw8Zv8eFeJfvCHq0jtMYbrpqoW RB0ZH1OakuvoSytoSlUPYMTy866B1HzIxfYUWLLl2EYjjJkykOkM/Int/0bvPQzmKI oh+JpkNfgCTzMeZBGBLtlm0OsIjABq9IK9Une+L8= From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/82064] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:57:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82064 Paul Thomas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- This seems to have been fixed in the dim and distant past but not closed. GNU Fortran (GCC) 8.3.1 20191027 through the current mainline all produce t= he two "OK"s and, yes, I did use the separate files. Closing. Paul=