public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/82139] unnecessary movapd with _mm_castsi128_pd to use BLENDPD on __m128i results
       [not found] <bug-82139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-09-04  3:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-09-06  6:09 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-04  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82139

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-09-04
           Keywords|                            |ra
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is worse on the trunk:
.L2:
        movdqu  (%rdi), %xmm1
        movdqu  (%rdi), %xmm0
        addq    $16, %rdi
        paddd   %xmm3, %xmm1
        paddd   %xmm2, %xmm0
        blendpd $2, %xmm0, %xmm1
        movups  %xmm1, -16(%rdi)
        cmpq    %rdi, %rax
        jne     .L2

Why two loads from %rdi here?
This is done during RA as far as I can tell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/82139] unnecessary movapd with _mm_castsi128_pd to use BLENDPD on __m128i results
       [not found] <bug-82139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-09-04  3:01 ` [Bug target/82139] unnecessary movapd with _mm_castsi128_pd to use BLENDPD on __m128i results pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-06  6:09 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: crazylht at gmail dot com @ 2021-09-06  6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82139

--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> It is worse on the trunk:
> .L2:
>         movdqu  (%rdi), %xmm1
>         movdqu  (%rdi), %xmm0
>         addq    $16, %rdi
>         paddd   %xmm3, %xmm1
>         paddd   %xmm2, %xmm0
>         blendpd $2, %xmm0, %xmm1
>         movups  %xmm1, -16(%rdi)
>         cmpq    %rdi, %rax
>         jne     .L2
> 
> Why two loads from %rdi here?
> This is done during RA as far as I can tell.

It looks like generic cost model should be updated.

w/ -O2 -msse4 -mno-avx -mtune=skylake looks optimal

  movdqu (%rdi), %xmm0
  movdqa %xmm3, %xmm1
  paddd %xmm0, %xmm1
  paddd %xmm2, %xmm0
  blendpd $2, %xmm0, %xmm1
  movups %xmm1, (%rdi)
  addq $16, %rdi
  cmpq %rdi, %rax
  jne .L2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-06  6:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-82139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-09-04  3:01 ` [Bug target/82139] unnecessary movapd with _mm_castsi128_pd to use BLENDPD on __m128i results pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-06  6:09 ` crazylht at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).