From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5808C3858C62; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 22:26:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5808C3858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696285571;
	bh=lJpSZhuY2Vp4nsYqB5WLD2iqQTlD93vbphrQ2AaKqao=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tBpjDbKde2rJzrgM6HusssFsBYoZyvRJ2Lxx+FrYBX91hkcx8JRv+0zcNFQyFybTT
	 UQWc/YevknSOnyMt9+/Pf3uSx0XIEfL0G3htreMBQ/3EQ63TqyhAeR83F0GtFs1NmQ
	 mm5yq/XMVe3l98t2YrXY/9F9cEcdpPOAN0Cnfgtg=
From: "lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/82335] Incorrect _Pragma expansion if macro passed
 to another macro
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 22:26:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.4.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status cc
 see_also
Message-ID: <bug-82335-4-oqJ48R5nE1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-82335-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-82335-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82335

Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-10-02
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90400,
                   |                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102409

--- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Depending which variant of the test you look at, this ended up getting reso=
lved
by r12-4797 and/or by r12-5454. It is the same issue as bug 102409 and bug
90400. The testcase from this PR seems worth adding in addition, so I will =
do
that prior to closing this one. Patch adding the testcase submitted for rev=
iew
here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/631814.html=