public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions [not found] <bug-82454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2021-08-14 21:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-04 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-14 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82454 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions [not found] <bug-82454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-08-14 21:24 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-04 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-04 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82454 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2017-10-09 00:00:00 |2023-8-3 See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=82339 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note the -Os regression part was improved via r8-3504-g2891beff1aa8e6 (PR 82339). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions [not found] <bug-82454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2021-08-14 21:24 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-04 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-04 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82454 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Actually this looks almost exactly the same as PR 82339 . ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-04 0:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-82454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-08-14 21:24 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/82454] Possible future performance regression in x86 for 64-bit constant expansions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-04 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).