From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 396A8385E032; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 07:52:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 396A8385E032 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1688716324; bh=bJykBorpR7Q9BLYZqAqNZEp3UZnYSktrHnY/4TN5NJc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dQL7/qvASqPI9KB6OO+GNvC5vf7zYzr7ePku+yQUciIuckrRXfxr44pFM4YhoRLnw pl4rZODXfWrAzXFV7HGpfas0kZZH4gZBdF1zKKfMsx/BybCPSe76G2X2/w8bxclb6k ipCbSJsQ1JzkcJ+5fuzEvpL5Hghvxn/9MO8rHCpc= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/82739] [10 Regression] Sort is 30% slower compared to gcc44 on presorted array Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 07:52:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work resolution bug_status cf_known_to_fail target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82739 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work| |11.1.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to fail| |10.5.0 Target Milestone|10.5 |11.0 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Works in GCC 11.=