From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C3F20385C420; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:07:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C3F20385C420 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/82885] memcpy does not propagate aliasing knowledge Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 17:07:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 17:07:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82885 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- The original testcase is fixed in GCC 8+: [local count: 1073741825]: __builtin_memcpy (ch1_3(D), ch2_4(D), 1048576); _1 =3D MEM[(const char *)ch2_4(D) + 2B]; *ch1_3(D) =3D _1; MEM[(char *)ch1_3(D) + 1B] =3D _1; fre1 is able to figure this out but this is not exactly propagating aliasing info, just that the value of ch2[2] cannot change if ch1[0] is stored with = the same value of what was in ch2[2]; memcpy is not needed to show that :). A better testcase which shows there is still a missing aliasing case: void foo3(char* ch1, char* ch2) { __builtin_memcpy(ch1, ch2, 1024*1024); ch1[0] =3D ch2[2] + 1; ch1[1] =3D ch2[2]; }=